Photo-Activated Sludge System (PAS): A novel algal-bacterial biotreatment for nutrient rich wastewater

Similar documents
CE421/521 Environmental Biotechnology. Nitrogen and Phosphorus Cycles Lecture Tim Ellis

Algal-Sludge Granules as a Novel Technique for Wastewater Treatment

SBR FOR LOW FLOW APPLICATIONS

Removal of High C and N Contents in Synthetic Wastewater Using Internal Circulation of Anaerobic and Anoxic/Oxic Activated Sludge Processes

Department of Civil Engineering-I.I.T. Delhi CVL723 Problem Set_2_Feb6_15

OPTIMIZATION OF AN INTERMITTENTLY AERATED AND FED SUBMERGED MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR

Energy Efficient Wastewater Treatment. Emily Gonthier & Jennifer Lawrence April 30, 2018

Managing Microalgae at the Pilot Scale

Algae for chemical free removal & recovery of phosphorus An industrial approach

Utilizing algal oxygen production for advanced wastewater treatment in a Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) the Biologically Aerated Reactor (BAR )

operation of continuous and batch reactors. Contrary to what happens in the batch reactor, the substrate (BOD) of the wastewater in the continuous rea

SWIM and Horizon 2020 Support Mechanism

1/11/2016. Types and Characteristics of Microorganisms. Topic VI: Biological Treatment Processes. Learning Objectives:

Anammox. Anaerobic Ammonium Oxidation (Anammox) for Nitrogen Removal. Abdullah Matalgah

Evaluation of Conventional Activated Sludge Compared to Membrane Bioreactors

ISAM SBR with Blower Assisted Jet Aeration Design Calculations For Lyons, CO WWTP Upgrade

NITROGEN REMOVAL GRANT WEAVER, PE & WWTP OPERATOR PRESIDENT THE WATER PLANET COMPANY. Create Optimal Habitats

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes

Probabilistic Modeling of Two-Stage Biological Nitrogen Removal Process: Formulation of Control Strategy for Enhanced Process Certainty

Chapter 9 Nitrification

SBR PROCESS FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT

Modelling of Wastewater Treatment Plants

Nutrient Removal Optimization at the Fairview WWTP

Troubleshooting Activated Sludge Processes. PNCWA - Southeast Idaho Operators Section Pocatello, ID February 11, 2016 Jim Goodley, P.E.

Feasibility Report on Sewage Treatment Plant (STP)

General Information on Nitrogen

Sludge recycling (optional) Figure Aerobic lagoon

Aqua MSBR MODIFIED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

FEASIBILITY REPORT OF 250 KLD SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT

100x Microalge. Fig. 1. Microalgae-bacteria granular system a) and its microscopic structure of the activated sludge

Microalgae as future bioresources for biofuels and chemical production

TWO YEARS OF BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITH AN ADVANCED MSBR SYSTEM AT THE SHENZHEN YANTIAN WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Sequence Batch Reactor A New Technology in Waste Water Treatment

ONSITE TREATMENT. Amphidrome

Wastewater Tools: Activated Sludge and Energy Use Analysis

Effect of the start-up length on the biological nutrient removal process

WASTEWATER 101 Fo r MOWA

CIE4485 Wastewater Treatment

Optimization of BNR from Wastewater Using SBR and A 2 O Processes. Guo, Lei (Eric)

RE ENGINEERING O&M PRACTICES TO GET NITROGEN & PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL WITHOUT FACILITY UPGRADES

ISAM INTEGRATED SURGE ANOXIC MIX

Thermophilic hydrolysis and acidification of activated sludge with a low organic carbon content under different sludge concentrations

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

Treatment performance of practical-scale down-flow hanging sponge reactor using sixth-generation sponge media

Characteristics of Nutrient Removal in Vertical Membrane Bioreactors

HOW TO SELECT SRT. SRT is selected based on the following treatment requirements/objectives:

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 2, No 1, Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing Association

Designing Single-Sludge Bionutrient Removal Systems

GROWTH KINETICS OF CHLORELLA VULGARIS AND BOTRYOCOCCUS BRAUNII BASED ON PRESENCE OF SODIUM BICARBONATE IN MEDIUM AS PARAMETER

EFFECT OF FERROUS SULPHATE ON THE SIMULTANEOUS ORGANIC MATTER AND NUTRIENT REMOVAL PERFORMANCE OF SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR

Growth of Microalgae for Biofuel Production on High Strength Wastewater

APPLICATION OF HUMATE SUSTAINABLE ALTERNATIVE FOR REMEDIATION OF WASTEWATER AND GROUNDWATER

Secondary Treatment Process Control

Advantages & Applications of MBBR Technologies

Presentation Outline

ADVANCING NOVEL PROCESSES FOR BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL

TREATMENT OF SUGAR PROCESS WASTE WATER AND BIOGAS PRODUCTION USING ALGAL BIOMASS

Application of the AGF (Anoxic Gas Flotation) Process

CE 370. Wastewater Characteristics. Quality. Wastewater Quality. The degree of treatment depends on: Impurities come from:

NEW BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL CONCEPT SUCCESSFULLY APPLIED IN A T-DITCH PROCESS WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

Effect of dynamic process conditions on nitrogen oxides. emission from a nitrifying culture

We Know Water. AnoxKaldnes. Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR) Integrated Fixed-Film Activated Sludge (IFAS) and ANITA Mox Deammonification

Nitrification and denitrification by algal-bacterial biomass in a Sequential Batch Photo-bioreactor: effect of SRT

Meet the environmental regulations for safe and sustainable disposal of desalination brine.

CTB3365x Introduction to Water Treatment

Wastewater Nitrogen Characteristics, Treatment and Removal Options. Bob Smith, Orenco Systems, Inc. GEC 2013

Carlo Pozza Urban wastewater treatment using Scenedesmussp.

Bio-Lair for Water Remediation

Urban wastewater treatment using Scenedesmussp.

AquaNereda Aerobic Granular Sludge Technology

Enhancing activated sludge nitrification through seeding from a downstream nitrifying fixed-film reactor

ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF OXIDATION DITCHES. Larry W. Moore, Ph.D., P.E., DEE Professor of Environmental Engineering The University of Memphis

A Solution for Microelectronics Manufacturing Wastewater Treatment

Advances in Multiobjective Optimization In Practice

COMPARISON OF SBR AND CONTINUOUS FLOW ACTIVATED SLUDGE FOR NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Application of MBR for the treatment of textile wastewater

ADVANCED CONTROL SYSTEM OF ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESSES USING IN- SITU AMMONIUM AND NITRATE PROBES

USE OF MICROALGAE FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS TREATMENT OF URBAN WASTEWATERS AND BIOENERGY PRODUCTION

Side Stream Nutrient Considera6ons and Nutrient Harves6ng

Bioremediation What is it and how does it work?

Developments in Mainstream Deammonification and Nitrite Shunt Haydée De Clippeleir

Sustainability and Innovation

Developments in Mainstream Deammonification and Nitrite Shunt Haydée De Clippeleir

AquaPASS. Aqua MixAir System. Phase Separator. System Features and Advantages. Anaerobic. Staged Aeration. Pre-Anoxic.

CEE 370 Fall Homework #8

ENVE 302 Environmental Engineering Unit Processes DENITRIFICATION

Development of a Novel Off-line Enricher Reactor Process Scheme for the Activated Sludge Degradation of Hazardous Wastes

A general Description of the IAWQ activated sludge model No.1

BM Respirometry for energy optimization in the aeration system of activated sludge processes

COLD WEATHER NITRIFICATION OF LAGOON EFFLUENT USING A MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR (MBBR) TREATMENT PROCESS

SIMPLE and FLEXIBLE ENERGY SAVINGS And PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENT for OXIDATION DITCH UPGRADES

Overview of Supplemental Carbon Sources for Denitrification and Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal

CORPORATION THE EXPERIENCED LEADER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR TECHNOLOGY

Operation of a small scale MBR system for wastewater reuse

Short-term and long-term studies of the co-treatment of landfill leachate and municipal wastewater

Modeling Reactions Between Activated Sludge Fractions and Ozone to Optimize Biosolids Reduction Processes

Algae Wastewater Biogas Robert Reinhardt AlgEn, algal technology centre, Slovenia

Increasing Denitrification in Sequencing Batch Reactors with Continuous Influent Feed

DETERMINATION OF MICROALGAE CELLULAR COMPOSITION AFTER PHYCOREMEDIATION OF SWINE WASTEWATERS

Upgrading Lagoons to Remove Ammonia, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus *nutrient removal in cold-climate lagoon systems

Transcription:

Photo-Activated Sludge System (PAS): A novel algal-bacterial biotreatment for nutrient rich wastewater PhD candidate: Angélica María Rada, MSc. Delft, April 215

OUTLINE Background and problem statement Objectives Experimental Setup Results & discussion Conclusions Future works

Background & problem statement Organic matter NH 3 Bacterial Oxidation (OHO) Nitrification (AOO, NOO) CO 2 NO 3 - Microalgal photosynthesis (PHO) Light Biomass Advantages: High effluent quality Low energy consumption Small areal footprint Technically easy to operate P O 2 Energy intensive activated sludge process 1. Exchange of carbon dioxide and oxygen. 3. Negative effect of the algae in the microbial growth. 4. Alterations of ph in the culture medium. 5. Exudates from the algae used as source of carbon to the bacteria. Low energy demanding algaebased natural processes Photo Activated Sludge System

Objectives Main Objective The main objective of the present research is to maximize the efficiency of the Photo- Activated Sludge System for the treatment of wastewater rich in nutrients, while achieving a valuable recovery of biomass. 1. Key kinetics parameters. Determination of the kinetics of the microalgae-bacteria 2. Optimal conditions of the key parameters (ph, SRT, HRT). consortia and the differences with the known kinetics of 3. Nutrient removal mechanisms. solely cultures of algae and bacteria. 4.Mathematical Model

Experimental Setup Starting Phase Inoculation Medium: BG 11 1. Scenedesmus quadricauda (1 ml) Volume = 4 L 2. Chlorella sp (1 ml) N-NH 4+ /L = 35 mg/l 3. Anabaena variabilis (1 ml) PO 3-4 = 1 mg/l 4. Chlorococcus sp (1 ml) Control of ph with buffer (ph 7.5) 5. Spirulina sp (1 ml) Temperature 25 Irradiance =1 µmol/m2/s REACTOR 1 Inoculums 1. Scenedesmus quadricauda 2. Chlorella sp ml of Activated Sludge (Harnaschpolder 3. Anabaena variabilis Wastewater Treatment Plant) 4. Chlorococcus sp 5. Spirulina sp 6. Activated Sludge bacteria REACTOR 2 1. Scenedesmus quadricauda (1 ml) 2. Chlorella sp (1 ml) 3. Anabaena variabilis (1 ml) 4. Chlorococcus sp (1 ml) 5. Spirulina sp (1 ml) Flat Reactor Flat Panel 1 Flat Panel 2 Flat Panel 3 Microbial communities Mixture of algae strains + enriched culture of nitrifiers Mixture of algae strains + Nitrification inhibitor Chlorella vulgaris + Nitrification inhibitor REACTOR 3.25x.2x.1 m for a total 1. working Chlorella volume sp ( of ml) 5 L Flat Panel 4 Activated Sludge bacteria

Experimental Setup Operation Periods P NH4-N Operation NH4-N loading rate HRT concentration scheme (mg NH 4 -N /l/d) Operation time 12.5 ((NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) Batch 3 4.1 3 days 1 27.4 ((NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) SBR 8 3.4 5 days 2 47.4 ((NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) SBR 8.9 7 days 3 258.4 ((NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 ) SBR 8 32.3 11 days 4 271.8 (NH 4 Cl) SBR 4 67.9 18 days 5 294.7 (NH 4 Cl) SBR 2 147.3 131 days Operation Scheme Start effluent discharge (2L) Duration: 15 min Hour: 12. pm Influent 1 (1L) Duration: 15 min Hour 12.15 pm Influent 2 (1L) Duration: 15 min Hour 12. am Start settling Stirrers turn off Duration: 3 min Hour: 11.3 pm

Results & Discussion - N compounds 1. Nitrogen compounds concentration 1.1 Nitrogen concentrations along the periods for R1: Microalgae-bacteria consortia N-compounds concentration (mg/l) 475 4 425 4 375 3 325 3 275 2 225 2 175 1 125 1 75 25 5 Day 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 Reactor 1 - Microalgae-bacteria consortia P1 P2 P3 P4 P5a P5b 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1 EFF - NH4 EFF-NO2 EFF-NO3 INF 15 11 115 12 125 13 135 14 145 1 155 Increase of Alkalinity (171d) 16 165 17 175 18 185 19 195

Results & Discussion - N compounds 1. Nitrogen compounds concentration 1.2 Nitrogen concentrations along the periods for R2: Microalgae consortia N-compounds concentration (mg/l) 475 4 425 4 375 3 325 3 275 2 225 2 175 1 125 1 75 25 5 Day 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 Reactor 2 - Microalgae consortia P1 P2 P3 P4 P5a P5b 55 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1 EFF - NH4 EFF-NO2 EFF-NO3 INF 15 11 115 12 125 13 135 14 145 1 155 Increase of Alkalinity (171d) 16 165 17 175 ATTU addition (184d) 18 185 19 195

Results & Discussion - N compounds 1. Nitrogen compounds concentration 1.3 Nitrogen concentrations along the periods for R: Cholerra Vulgaris N-compounds concentration (mg/l) 475 4 425 4 375 3 325 3 275 2 225 2 175 1 125 1 75 25 5 Day 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 55 Reactor 3 - Chlorella Vulgaris P1 P2 P3 P4 P5a P5b 6 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1 EFF - NH4 EFF-NO2 EFF-NO3 INF 15 11 115 12 125 13 135 14 145 1 155 Increase of Alkalinity (171d) 16 165 17 175 18 185 ATTU addition (184d) 19 195

Results & Discussion - N compounds 1. 2 Ammonium removal rate for microalgae and nitrifiers Ammonium removal rate (mgnh 4 -N/L/d) Ammonium removal rate (mgnh 4 -N/L/d) 14 13 12 11 1 9 8 7 6 4 3 2 1 Day 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 Reactor Ammonium 1 - Ammonium removal rate removal - Reactor rate2 3 P1 P2 P3 P4 P5a P5b Ammonium Removal - Ammonium Removal - Periods algae bacteria mgfsa-n/l/d mgfsa-n/l/d R1 R2 R3 R1 Increase of Alkalinity R2 (171d) R3 4 64.6 64. 64.2.84 -- -- 5a 3. 32.5 34. 3.21 -- -- 5b 41.9 4.1 47.6 32.14 -- -- Microalgae-Bacteria allows us to have higher ammonium conversion rates!!! 55 6 65 7 75 8 Ammonium removal rate - algae 85 9 95 1 15 11 115 12 125 13 135 14 145 1 155 Ammonium removal rate - nitrifiers 16 ATTU addition (184d) ATTU Increase of addition Alkalinity (171d) (184d) 165 17 175 18 185 19 195

Results & Discussion - N compounds 1. 2 Suspended solids 5.5 Reactor Reactor 1 - Microalgae-bacteria 32 - Chlorella Vulgaris consortia P1 P1 P2 P2 P3 P3 P4 P4 P4 P5a P5a P5b 5. 4.5 Solids concentrations (g/l) 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. Day 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 55 6 TSS - R1 R2 R3 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1 15 11 VSS - R1 R2 R3 115 12 125 13 135 14 145 1 155 16 165

Results & Discussion - N compounds 1. 2 Suspended solids Solids concentrations (g/l) 5.5 5. 4.5 4. 3.5 3. 2.5 Reactor Reactor 1 - Microalgae-bacteria 32 - Chlorella Vulgaris consortia P1 P1 P2 P2 P3 P3 P4 P4 P4 P5a P5a P5b Period R2 R3 g/m 2 /d g/m 2 /d 3 22.75 12.19 4 13. 26. 5a 2.6 32.36 5b 36.33 58.17 2. 1.5 1..5. Day 5 1 15 2 25 3 35 4 45 55 6 TSS - R1 R2 R3 65 7 75 8 85 9 95 1 15 11 VSS - R1 R2 R3 115 12 125 13 135 14 145 1 155 16 165

Results & Discussion - N compounds 3. Nitrogen removal rates and biomass growth rate of algae and Nitrifiers 3.1 Nitrogen removal rates and biomass growth rate of Nitrifiers Period Ammonium loading rate Measured Based on substrate HRT Rxbacteria Rs bacteria µ µmax mgfsa/l/d 1/d mgvss/l/d mgfsa-n/l/d 1/d 1/d 4 67.9 4.7.84 1.94 1.99 5a 149.7 2.55 3.21.94.95 5b 142.8 2 28.34 32.14.19.19 µmax 2.5 2. 1.5 1..5. Max specific growth rate of nitrifiers 1 2 3 4 Ammonium loading rate (mgfsa-n/l/d) 2. y = 2.6538x + 1.873 1.5 R² =.9997 1..5. -.5-1. -1.5-2. -2.5-3. -3.5-1.6-1.4-1.2-1. -.8 -.6 -.4 -.2..2 Log (1/Rsb) Log (µm/y)

Results & Discussion - N compounds 3. Nitrogen removal rates and biomass growth rate of algae and Nitrifiers 3.2 Nitrogen removal rates and biomass growth rate of algae Reactor 1 - ALGAE Ammonium Measured Based on substrate HRT VSS Rxalgae Periods loading rate Rs algae µ µmax mgfsa/l/d 1/d gvss/l mgvss/l/d mgfsa/l/d 1/d 1/d 3 32.3 8 1.6 1639.7 29.5.19.19 4 67.9 4.5 478.2 64.6 1.47 1.47 5a 149.7 2.5 534.8 3..61.61 5b 142.8 2 2.1 285. 41.9.22.22 Reactor 2 - ALGAE Ammonium Measured Based on substrate HRT VSS Rxalgae Periods loading rate Rs algae µ µmax mgfsa/l/d 1/d gvss/l mgvss/l/d mgfsa-n/l/d 1/d 1/d 3 32.3 8 1.8 227.5 29.7.18.18 4 67.9 4.5 135. 64. 1.28 1.28 5a 149.7 2.4 178.2 32.5.99.99 5b 142.8 2.7 357.2 4.1.61.61 Reactor 3 - ALGAE Ammonium Measured Based on substrate HRT VSS Rxalgae Periods loading rate Rs algae µ µmax mgfsa/l/d 1/d gvss/l mgvss/l/d mgfsa-n/l/d 1/d 1/d 3 32.3 8.9 19.4 29.8.37.37 4 67.9 4.5 131.5 64.2 1.32 1.32 5a 149.7 2.3 161.4 34. 1.14 1.14 5b 142.8 2.8 391.7 47.6.66.66

Results & Discussion - N compounds 3. Nitrogen removal rates and biomass growth rate of algae and Nitrifiers 3.2 Nitrogen removal rates and biomass growth rate of algae µmax 1.6 1.4 1.2 1..8.6.4.2. Specific growth rate - algae 25 75 1 125 1 175 Ammonium loading rate (mgfsa-n/l/d) Ammonium conversion rate (mg mgfsa-n/l/d) 8 7 6 4 3 2 1 R1 R2 R3 Algae ammonium converstion rate (mgfsa-n/l/d) Net ammonium conversion rate per biomass concentration 1 2 3 4 Biomass concentration (mgvss/l) 7 6 4 3 2 1 Algae ammonium conversion rate per biomass concentration 1 2 3 4 Biomass concentration (mgvss/l) Rs - R1 Rsalgae - R1 Rsalgae - R2 Rsalgae - R3

Conclusions Coupling bacteria with algae process increase the efficiency of ammonium removal without external aeration Ammonium removal rates of 7 mg/l/d by algae and bacteria at HRT of days Higher ammonium removal at higher solid concentrations (3 g/l) Reduction in the specific growth rate of alga and nitrifiers when in a microalge-bacteria system The algae biomass has presented tolerance at high concentration of NO 2 -N

Challenges!!! 1. More accurate and precise determination of the kinetic parameters 2. More accurate determination of algae biomass and bacterial biomass 3. Modelling of the Microalgae bacteria system

1 THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION!