Reducing Lost and Unaccounted for Natural Gas in Distribution Systems

Similar documents
Reducing Lost and Unaccounted for Natural Gas in Distribution Systems

Lost and Unaccounted for Gas

NRRI Colloquium July 11, 2015 Answering Questions about Methane Emissions from the Natural Gas Sector

Overview of Oil and Gas Sector Methane Emissions and Potential Projects

Methane Management Report

2018 Edison Electric Institute and American Gas Association. ESG/Sustainability Reporting Template

Methane Management Report

ONE Future 2017 Methane Emission Intensities: Initial Progress Report

ONE Future 2017 Methane Emission Intensities: Initial Progress Report

April 25, 2006 Villahermosa, Mexico. Compressors: Agenda

Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Potential from Natural Gas Systems

Natural Gas STAR Methane Challenge Program: Supplementary Technical Information for ONE Future Commitment Option

Oil and Gas Systems Methane Emissions A Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Revenue Generating Opportunity

METHANE MANAGEMENT REP ORT 2016

The Significance of Methane:

UNDERSTANDING UPDATES TO THE EPA INVENTORY OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM NATURAL GAS SYSTEMS

November 9, 2011 Harrisburg, PA

U.S. NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE

U.S. EPA Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule, New Source Performance Standards, and Methane Emissions Reduction Opportunities

FLORIDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

Natural Gas in a Carbon-Constrained World

Climate, Air Quality and Permitting Proposals For the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. September 2015

An Update on the Gas Industry

Pennsylvania Energy Association Pipeline Safety. Paul Metro Manager Pipeline Safety PAPUC

Actions to Reduce Methane and VOC Emissions from the Oil and Natural Gas Industry: Final Rules and Draft Information Collection Request

Natural Gas Industry Perspective

U.S. Emissions

UGI Utilities, Inc. Winter Reliability Report

Methane Emissions in the Natural Gas Life Cycle and Implications for Power Generation: Update on Emission Studies

Methane Emission Standards for Crude Oil and Natural Gas Facilities

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.

Cross-Sector Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities. Advancing Project Development in India through Public Private Partnerships

EPA s Proposed GHG Reporting Rule:

Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Annual Winter Reliability Assessment Meeting

Proposed Methane Regulations. A Significant Step in Addressing Climate Change in Canada

Environmental, Economic, and Technological Effects of Methane Emissions and Abatement

Opportunities for Methane Emissions Reductions in Natural Gas Production. Technology Transfer Workshop. April 25, 2006 Villahermosa, Mexico

DOE Investments in Natural Gas Midstream Infrastructure

2018 Methane Emissions Report

2018 ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL, GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY REPORT

PENNSYLVANIA S ENERGY RESOURCES Powering Communities into the Future

Reducing Emissions Through Retrofitting of High Bleed Devices. Presented By: Greg Giernoth

EPA's Proposed Air Pollution Standards for the Oil and Natural Gas Sector Preliminary Analysis September 2011

2015 Statewide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Natural Gas Infrastructure Replacement and Expansion Efforts

What information should be submitted to the District regarding Circulation Tanks for Well Stimulation Treatments?

Chevron s Experiences in Methane Mitigation

A PENNSYLVANIA FRAMEWORK OF ACTIONS FOR METHANE REDUCTIONS FROM THE OIL AND GAS SECTOR

October 21, 2015 Bruce Benson 2015 Pipeline Safety Seminar Mt Snow, VT. Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection

LDZ Energy Loss Final Estimates Financial Year 2015/16

Denver Metropolitan Area and North Front Range 8-Hour Ozone State Implementation Plan

TAKING STOCK: Opportunities and Challenges in California s Natural Gas Distribution System

Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems 2012 Data Summary

India Sector Overview. Advancing Project Development in India through Public Private Partnerships

A Look at Fugitive GHG Emissions Reporting and the Effects on Regulated Facilities

OVERVIEW OF REGULATORY STRUCTURE FOR AIR EMISSIONS FROM OIL AND GAS SOURCES IN PENNSYLVANIA

Summary of Climate Action Panel Recommendations. Colorado Emissions

U.S. EPA S MAY 12, 2016 ACTIONS AFFECTING THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY

OEC Tackles Big Public Health & Environmental Problems

Case study: Enagás. Claudio Rodríguez Suárez Gas Assets General Manager

Wyoming Natural Gas Waste Report

LDZ Shrinkage Quantity Initial Proposals. Formula Year 2016/17

Santa Barbara County APCD

Description [in natural gas volume] Emissions estimated from size of breach / pressure / duration calculation

Gas Pipeline Safety March 2012

MATERIAL SUBJECT #5: ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE

Overview of the Emission Inventory from For Unconventional Natural Gas and Other Industries

Statewide Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory for Office of Climate and Energy

Transmission Pipeline Opportunities. Advancing Project Development in India through Public Private Partnerships

Methane: Sources and Reduction Opportunities. Ellen Baum and Joe Chaisson November 7, 2007

Towards U.S. Emissions Reductions

Association of Union Constructors Industry Leaders Forum Natural Gas Industry Update. December 14, 2017

Review of Compressor Station Measurements. Measurement Project Update September 7, 2010

Marcellus Shale: Powering the Nation White House Briefing. January 9, 2018

E NERGY Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Reference Manual

October 23, 2018 Harrisburg, PA

Letter to Stakeholders

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

Air Regulations Impacting the Pipeline Industry

2016 Sustainability Scorecard. A Supplement to NiSource s 2016 Integrated Annual Report

Presented by: Timothy J. Skone, PE ONE Future Methane & Climate Strategies Event, Houston, TX: May 15, Solutions for Today Options for Tomorrow

Accelerating Pipeline Replacements Issues and Challenges. Susan Fleck National Grid November 20, 2014

Ohio's GHG Emissions Profile Update

Smart Modernization: Infrastructure Replacement & Expansion Update. NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance, 2016 Fall Conference

Pipeline safety regulations apply to all pipelines that transport either flammable gas or hazardous liquids where the product affects interstate

Synthesis of recent ground-level methane emission measurements from the U.S. natural gas supply chain

Knowing what s below will help protect you, your family and your neighbors

How to Develop a Methane Emissions Feasibility and Measurement Study

The Shifting Sands of Natural Gas Abundance

Capacity & Opportunity for Growth in the Methane Mitigation Sector ABOUT MELA

Vapor Recovery Units: Agenda

192GasCatalog.

Ventilation Air Methane Abatement System Review

Minnesota Natural Gas Distribution Profile

BLM Forum on Venting and Flaring of Gas Produced from Onshore Federal Lands. Statement of Tomás Carbonell

40 CFR 98 Subpart W Petroleum and Natural Gas Systems

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY ADVANCED METERING INFRASTRUCTURE CHAPTER I SOCALGAS AMI VISION AND POLICY

Transparency and GHG Reporting: Welcome to the Fishbowl. Georgette Reeves, Trinity Consultants

Going Green: Tracking Down the Greenhouse Gas SF 6 with Infrared Thermography

Transcription:

Reducing Lost and Unaccounted for Natural Gas in Distribution Systems Summary: Reduce lost and unaccounted (L&U) for natural gas from natural gas distribution operations by 15% by the year 2020. The period of analysis is 2013 through 2020. Fugitive emissions reductions are assumed to be implemented linearly until the 15% target is reached in 2020. Introduction: The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) requires Nature Gas Distribution Companies (NGDC) to report their levels of unaccounted for gas regularly. However, there is little case law defining unaccounted for gas. The American Gas Association defines L&U as the difference between the total gas available from all sources, and the total gas accounted for as sales, net interchange, and company use. Prior to April 2012 unaccounted for natural gas was not defined in 66 Pa. C.S. 1307 or 52 Pa Code 53 or 59. On April 4, 2012, the PUC finalized rulemaking establishing a uniform definition of unaccounted natural gas and level metrics for natural gas distribution system losses for Pennsylvania s NGDCs. Unaccounted for natural gas is now defined as the difference between total amount of gas supplies delivered to the NGDC and he amount of gas that the NGDC subsequently delivers to its retail, commercial and industrial customers, adjusted for company use, temperature, pressure variations or other allowed variables. It is the gas that is lost during transportation from supplier to customer. This uniform definition will allow for more accurate accountability for lost and unaccounted for natural gas. Natural gas is released to the atmosphere through fugitive and vented emissions. Fugitive emissions are methane leaks often through pipeline and system components (such as compressor seals, pump seals and valve packing). Vented emissions are methane leaks from a variety of equipment and operational practices, such as well completion activities and are directly attributed to an organization s actions but also through accidental line breaks and thefts. Baseline Activities for 2009 (latest data): Natural Gas Consumers in Pennsylvania in 2009 11 2,873,948 Residential 2,635,869 (91.7%) Commercial 233,333 (8.12%) Industrial 4,746 (0.002%) Pennsylvania Natural Gas Consumption by End User in 2009 Residential 228 Bcf (30%) Commercial 144 Bcf (19%) Industrial 173 Bcf (23%) Electric Power Generation 211 Bcf (28%) Pennsylvania Natural Gas Production in 2009 Conventional Production 209.3 Bcf Marcellus Production 78.4 Bcf Total Production 287.8 Bcf Lost & Unaccounted for Natural Gas: 1 Gas Consumers and Gas Consumption information was provided through an U.S Energy Information System query 2010 Data 1

NGDCs report L&U natural gas to the PUC. It is important to reduce natural gas losses for safety concerns. Reducing these losses also provides significant environmental benefit via the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) natural gas (methane) is approximately 21 times more harmful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. Table 1 indicates the last reported Distribution Utilities L&U natural gas was 18.7 billion cubic feet (Bcf). In the previous action plan the reported L&U was 19.6 Bcf. This is a decrease in L&U gas of approximately 4.6% while the number of natural gas consumers has increased by approximately 1.2% and the amount of natural gas consumption has increased approximately 19.5% since last reported in the previous action plan. However, the reported L&U values are not accurately estimating gas companies individual contributions to fugitive or vented emissions for the following reasons: 1) End-use consumer meters (likely to be residential sector meters) do not accurately measure delivered volumes. This is because some meters do not accurately account for temperature and pressure sensitivities. It is thought that consumer meters are approximately + or 3% in measurement accuracy. 2) Natural gas companies use a portion of their product in various stages of the transmission process (i.e. compressors), which is not separately quantified. 3) Gas theft may also be occurring, although it is assumed to be a relatively minor loss with regard to L&U reporting. 4) The PUC does not have standardized calculation/reporting procedures for L&U. In previous years, some utilities have actually report gains (delivered volumes in excess of what was reportedly placed into the system) instead of losses. This means that it is not possible to draw conclusions from the PUC s statewide L&U statistics. 5) The PUC indicates there are approximately 6,000 line breaks per year due to accidents (i.e. diggingup a line during construction). Methane releases from these individual accidents have not been quantified. Therefore, there are three primary areas that need to be addressed to improve our understanding L&U natural gas: Accurate measurement and reporting. Operations and maintenance improvements (or replacements) to lines and aging parts and Minimization of accidental losses through line breaks. Potential GHG Reductions and Economic Costs: Table 1. Estimated GHG Reductions and Cost-effectiveness GHG emission savings (2020) 0.006 MMtCO 2 e Net present value (2013 2020) N/Q $million Cumulative emissions reductions (2013 2020) 0.102 MMtCO 2 e Cost-effectiveness (2013 2020) N/Q $/tco 2 e GHG = greenhouse gas; MMtCO 2 e = million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; $/tco 2 e = dollars per metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent. Negative numbers indicate costs savings. 2

Table 2: Lost & Unaccounted-for Natural Gas for Major Gas Distribution Companies + Distribution Company Total Lost & Unaccounted-for (Mcf) Total Deliveries (Mcf) Percent L & U Data Year Columbia 66,646 117,680,838 0.06% 2010 Dominion-Peoples 5,764,495 90,143,516 6.39% 2008 Equitable 2,428,560 60,568,085 4.01% 2010 National Fuel 939,364 50,456,478 1.86% 2010 PECO Gas 2,480,886 91,030,465 2.73% 2010 UGI - Penn 291,315 65,334,580 0.45% 2010 Phila. Gas Works 4,969,805 89,222,623 5.57% 2010 PPL Gas 1,531,629 27,831,130 5.50% 2007 UGI - Gas 279,301 124,401,133 0.22% 2010 Totals 18,752,001 716,668,848 2.62% + There are no PUC standards for reporting lost and unaccounted for natural gas Table 2 provides data on the amount of cast iron and unprotected steel pipe in each distribution company s territory. These two types of pipe have the highest fugitive loss rates. Much of the pipeline replacements that are occurring use plastic coated steel or similar material that is less permeable and provides a measure of increased safety and increased longevity. Each of the distribution companies has a plan in place with the PUC for ongoing replacement of aging distribution pipelines. Table 3: Pennsylvania Distribution Sector Report on Cast Iron and Unprotected Steel 2 Distribution Company Miles of Cast Iron Miles of Unprotected Bare Steel Total Miles Distribution % of Statewide Total Cast Iron % of Statewide Total Unprotected Bare Steel Columbia Gas of PA 74 2127 7,260 2.3% 25.0% Dominion Peoples 66 1,908 6,566 2.0% 22.4% Equitable Gas 47 705 3,307 1.4% 8.3% National Fuel Gas 93 1,051 4,916 2.8% 12.3% PECO 836 369 6,614 25.5% 4.3% UGI Penn Natural 82 305 2,562 2.5% 3.6% Phila. Gas Works 1,624-3,019 49.5% 0.0% PPL Gas 28 661 3,619 0.9% 7.8% T.W. Phillips - 1,095 2,955 0.0% 12.9% UGI 428 300 5,012 13.1% 3.5% 2 Developed by the PUC using U.S. Department of Transportation Data 3

Figure 1: 2009 U.S. Distribution Sector Methane Emissions (72 Bcf) 3 Table 4: 15 Percent of Pennsylvania L&U 2009 Distribution Sector Emissions (18.7 Bcf) Implementation NG Loss Cos ($ Recovered NG Saved CO2e % loss (MCF) Million) (Mcf) ($ Million) (MMT) Cost $/t CO2e Meters 8% 224,400 $5.180 29,806 $0.146 0.008 $629 Cast and Unprotected Steel 33% 925,650 $58.906 122,948 $0.603 0.034 $1,943 other 18% 504,900 n/a 67,063 $0.324 0.019 N/Q Metering and Regulating Stations 40% 1,122,000 n/a 149,028 $0.731 0.041 N/Q TOTAL 99% 2,776,950 $64.086 368,845 $1,804 0.102 Economic Cost: According to the EPA, fugitive emissions from commercial/industrial and residential customer meters account for 8 percent of the national total for natural gas industry methane emissions.* The average leak rate per residential meter is only 0.01 scf/hr (0.0003 m3/hr), but there are approximately 40 million customer meters located outdoors, 2.6 million of which, according to the PUC, are located in PA. These emissions are related to fugitive methane losses from the meter and associated pipe and fittings. To contribute to the 15 percent reduction in L&U natural gas by the year 2020, PA distribution companies would need to replace 51.8 thousand meters by 2020. This amount of meter replacements would result in more than 8,000 metric tons of methane emission reductions. According to the EPA, distribution sector emissions are driven primarily by underground pipeline leaks and metering and pressure regulating stations (M&PR stations), as identified in Table 4. Fugitive methane emissions from underground pipe lines (cast iron and unprotected steel) account for 33 percent 3 U.S. EPA, 2011: November 2011, Natural Gas Star Program Accomplishments * Based on Figure 1 above 4

of the national total from the natural gas industry. The PUC states that about 12,000 miles of aging gas mains need replacing (3,278 miles of cast iron, 8,907 miles of unprotected bare steel-see table above). The estimated cost of replacing gas mains is approximately $1 million/mile. To achieve a 15 percent reduction in L&U natural gas from 2013 through 2020, 58 miles of gas mains would need to be replaced, resulting in nearly 34,000 metric tons of methane emission reductions. Assuming a linear relationship between lost gas and the rate of pipeline replacement would yield a cost of approximately $$58.9 million. At historical rates of replacement, the replacement of 58 miles of underground pipeline would take approximately 20 years..in order to facilitate the goal of this work plan and to address the aging gas main safety issues a more rigorous plan to replace 8.5 miles of gas mains annually should be undertaken by the NGDCs. The PUC believes there may be future federal government requirements to eliminate the older gas mains and expedite there replacement with the installation of new generation gas mains.. M&R stations in the distribution segment include both transmission-to-distribution custody transfer points and the downstream pressure reduction stations. The EPA estimates fugitive emissions from regulator stations and M&R stations account for 40 percent of the total annual national methane emissions*. The primary losses from M&R stations include both fugitive emissions and, in some cases, emissions from pneumatic devices. Some pressure regulating stations use gas-operated pneumatic devices to position the pressure regulators. These gas-operated pneumatic devices bleed to the atmosphere continuously and/or when the regulator is activated for some system designs. Other designs bleed the gas downstream into the lower pressure pipeline and, therefore, have no losses associated with the pneumatic devices. By redesigning bleed devices and addressing other sources of fugitive emission at M&R stations, methane emissions could drop by 15 percent by 2020. This could eliminate approximately 40.7 thousand metric tons of methane emissions. According to the EPA Other Sources of methane emissions are responsible for 4% of total national annual methane emissions*. One of these sources of emissions is blow and purge operations. Blow (or blow-down) gas refers to intentional and unintentional venting of gas for maintenance, routine operations, or emergency conditions. For Example; periodically natural gas is discharged to the atmosphere for one of two reasons: 1) maintenance blow-down-- the gas is vented from equipment to eliminate the flammable material inside the equipment providing a safer working environment for personnel that service or enter the equipment; or 2) emergency blow-down-- the gas is vented from a site to eliminate a potential fuel source, for example in case of fire. The factors that affect the volume of methane blow-down released to the atmosphere are frequency, volume of gas blow-down per event, and the disposition of the blow-down gas. By limiting the frequency and volume of blow and purge events and redirecting the gas downstream back into the line nearly 18 thousand metric tons could be eliminated by 2020. Implementation Steps: Replacing customer meter sets with temperature and pressure compensated meters may cost $100 per meter (PUC estimate). There are about 2.6 million households using natural gas (not including commercial and industrial consumers which may have temperature/pressure meters). This will result in improved metering with more accurate measuring of end-use calculation for L&U and consumption along with reduced fugitive emissions from aging meters. NGDCs should be encouraged to participate in existing voluntary industry programs, such as EPA s Natural Gas STAR Program. Natural Gas STAR is focused on reducing methane emissions through technology transfer using best practices in operation and maintenance. Natural Gas STAR provides analytical tools and services to assist in calculating companies methane emissions. Encourage utilities to regularly perform self-assessments and report (to the PUC) operation and maintenance practices that have resulted in environmental savings. 5

Improved and standardized L&U reporting for all NGDCs doing business in Pennsylvania. This would require PUC staff to develop standardized accurate reporting methods. Note: In early June 2012 the PUC issued for comment proposed regulations that would create a uniform definition of UFG and level metrics for natural gas distribution system losses for the state s NGDCs. We must improve on reducing accidental line breaks in Pennsylvania. Despite the availability and use of Pennsylvania s One Call System to identify underground utilities before digging, there remain too many accidents. Accidents by home owners and contractors have occurred even after notification to the One Call System and identification of underground utility services has been made. Perhaps increased enforcement and penalties of the Pennsylvania One Call System could help reduce the number of accidents. This could require additional staff time to enforce, but may be offset by fines and penalties. Develop and implement a plan for the replacement of at least 8.5 miles of aging cast iron and unprotected steel pipe gas mains annually through 2020 and beyond. Potential Overlap: None References: U.S. Energy Information System query 2010 Data. U.S. EPA, 2011: November 2011, Natural Gas Star Program Accomplishment. PA. PUC, 2010: February 2010, Natural Gas Statistics Report for Pennsylvania U.S. EPA, Estimate of Methane Emissions from the U.S. Natural Gas Industry 6