Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands

Similar documents
Regeneration of Upper-Elevation Red Oak in the White Mountains of New Hampshire

Mixed oak Hickory Silvicultural systems

Basics of the Oak Shelterwood Method

Restoring and Regenerating High Graded Forests. Jim Finley School of Forest Resources

Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests

A brief introduction to general terms and concepts related to the forestry learning objectives

Understanding Silviculture

Production of High-Quality Timber Products Through Forest Management. Wayne K. Clatterbuck Forest Management & Silviculture UT Extension, Knoxville

A Comparison of Two Stem Injection Treatments Applied to American Beech in Central West Virginia

The Ups and Downs of Final Harvests*

Eastern Oak Silviculture The role of prescribed fire. Dan Dey U.S. Forest Service, Northern Research Station Columbia, MO

8) Which of the following species is best adapted to poorly drained sites? a) Bur oak b) Eastern red cedar c) Black ash d) Yellow birch

Cooper Creek ECS Ecological Departure Analysis

PRINCIPLES OF SILVICULTURE FWF 312 SOME SELECTED SILVICULTURAL DEFINITIONS

Shelterwood Method Characteristics

Forensic Forestry Reading the Land

2.4 MANAGING FOR HIGH-VALUE TREES

2015 Wisconsin Envirothon KEY Forestry Exam

Rehabilitation of degraded hardwood stands notes from CT. Degraded stands: definition, extent and causes. What can you do?

Principles of Forest Ecology and Management. Forensic Forestry Reading the Land. Jonathan Kays University of Maryland Extension

2017 Cannonsville Tornado Salvage

INTENSIVE GROUP SELECTION SILVICULTURE IN CENTRAL HARDWOODS AFTER 40 YEARS I. Leon S. Minckler 2

Forestry. A Big Thanks

Formulating an Expanding-Gap Regeneration System for Quercus Dominated Stands. John M. Lhotka

Forest Stewardship Plan

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatment Descriptions and Unit Specific Design Criteria

Inventory and Assessment of Mud Pond Country Park

ATTACHMENT 4: DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TYPES MESABI PROJECT

Ontario Hardwood Overview. Hardwood Tour Oct.19-21

Evaluating the Management Potential of Upland Hardwood Stands

Forest Stewardship Regenerating Hardwood Forests: Managing Competing Plants, Deer, and Light

Photo Guide for Predicting Fire Risk to Hardwood Trees during Prescribed Burning Operations in Eastern Oak Forests

Silviculture Lab 5: Pine Silviculture & Natural Regen Page 1 of 6

Crop Tree Management. How to help your forest grow high quality timber by giving your trees ample room to grow. Paul Bane IDNR Forester

MANAGED FOREST LANDS STEWARDSHIP FORESTRY PLAN

FORESTRY TALK: A GLOSSARY OF COMMON TERMS

Measuring Tree Seedlings and Associated Understory Vegetation in Pennsylvania s Forests. Methods

Stand Development and Yields o Appalachian Hardwood Stands Managed with Single-Tree Selection for at Least 30 Years

UNEVEN-AGED MANAGEMENT NORTHWEST CERTIFIED FORESTRY

NTRALHARDWOOD NOTES. Estimating Oak Growth and Yield. Managed Stand Yield. Individual Tree Growth and Yield Models

Silviculture Research on the Penobscot Experimental Forest

Inventory and Assessment of Shelburne Farms Woodlots

Forest Characteristics. Integrating Forest Management and Wildlife. Effects of Silvicultural Practices. Management of Succession

Impact of Deer Management Inaction on Natural Ecosystems. Anne Hairston-Strang, Ph.D. Forest Hydrologist MD DNR Forest Service

FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN For the GLADDEN MEMORIAL WOODLAND

Advanced Oak Seedling Development as Influenced by Shelterwood Treatments, Competition Control, Deer Fencing, and Prescribed Fire

Uneven-age Stand Management. a.k.a. Uneven-aged (Sized) Silviculture Walt Wintturi- Watershed to Wildlife

North Shore Restoration Project: Adaptive Management Implementation Guide. Version 1.0 August 2014

Introduction. Plot Methods

Uncompahgre Mesas Project Area 2015 Monitoring Report

An Overview of Competition Control Methods in Hardwood Management

The maps below show the location of the Macedonia Analysis Area and the compartments included in the AA.

SILVICULTURE & WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT

Growth and Yield. Lecture 8 (4/27/2017)

Improving Hardwood Timber Stands

Aspen and Oak Community Response to Restoration. Bobette Jones Coye Burnett

PB1774 Technical Guide to Crop Tree Release in Hardwood Forests

SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE 10/8/2018. Ecological forestry (Ecosystem management)

FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. Al Malone 12 Pinedale Ave. Jamestown, MD MD GRID: 949,000 / 158,000 LOCATION

ASCC Data Collection and Implementation Timeline

COOPERS ROCK STATE FOREST FORKS OF SCOTT RUN PISGAH PROJECT SILVICULTURAL PRESCRIPTION & OVERVIEW FOR MULTIPLE USE MANAGEMENT

NTRAL HARDWOOD NOTES. Thinning Even-Aged, Upland Oak Stands

2017 Regional Envirothon

Advance S and Vigor on Sunriva a

Extension Treatments for Improving Degraded Hardwood Stands

Paoli Experimental. Forest NORTHERN RESEARCH STATION EXPERIMENTAL FOREST NETWORK. United States Department of Agriculture. Forest.

APPENDIX C: TIMBER ANALYSES

NATURAL RESOURCES FOREST MANAGEMENT

ADVANCING INDIVIDUAL TREE BIOMASS PREDICTION: ASSESSMENT AND ALTERNATIVES TO THE COMPONENT RATIO METHOD

Effects of Herbicide Release on the Growth of 8- to 12-Year-Old Hardwood Crop Trees

SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY INITIATIVE

Managing Forested Wildlife Habitats

Clara Unit Card. Alternative 2 Acres: 19 Treatment Acres: 6 Stand Age: 106 Primary ELT: 16. Primary Treatment: Single-Tree Selection

Summary of 2012 Fire Effects Monitoring for the Southern Blue Ridge Fire Learning Network 1. Peter Bates 2 December 21, 2012

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatments

WISCONSIN WOODLANDS:

FWF Silviculture Lab Exercise 2018 Spring Semester. Comparison of Thinning Methods

LAKE STATES WOODLANDS Managing Northern Hardwood Stands

nventory and Ana ysis Unit's

Survival and Growth of Planted Northern Red Oak in Northern West Virginia t

Flight 93 National Memorial Reforestation Project (Phases I-IV)

Manage. Why Manage Your Sugarbush? Sustainable Sugarbush Management 8 Steps and Actions

Avian Habitat Considerations in Northern Hardwoods Silviculture

Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement

Making a Plan for Your Woods

The Influence of Species on Site Selection and Timber Removal in West Virginia. William Luppold 1 and Delton Alderman 2 USDA Forest Service

Two-Age System. and Deferment Harvests

ATTACHMENT Purpose and Need and Proposed Action for Proposed Georgia Aster and Shortleaf Pine Management Project

Crop Tree Management

Predicting dynamics of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) advance regeneration under shelterwood silviculture

FOREST INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS NATIONAL CORE FIELD GUIDE VOLUME I SUPPLEMENT: FIELD DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURES FOR PHASE 2+ PLOTS

Long-term U.S. Forest Service Research at the Penobscot Experimental Forest

SILVICULTURE TERMINOLOGY

Two-Aged Development of a Hickory and Yellow-Poplar Stand at Chuck Swan State Forest- Preliminary Results

Northern White-Cedar

Recruitment of Shortleaf Pine into the Upper Canopy of Mixed Species Even Aged Forest in Southeast Missouri Ozarks

Evaluation of an Oak Woodland Restoration at Deer Grove Forest Preserve. Pete Jackson February 7, 2009

Planting Containerized Seedlings: Advantages &Disadvantages. Dan Dey U.S. Forest Service Northern Research Station

2004 Council on Forest Engineering (COFE) Conference Proceedings: Machines and People, The Interface Hot Springs, April 27-30, 2004

A Pictorial Comparison of Seasonal Timing and Frequency of Prescribed Fire in Longleaf Pine Stands

Transcription:

Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands Powered By Powered by: USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis

Powered By Powered by: Regen for Excel is a simulation model that using rankings of expected postharvest performance to predict species composition of dominant and codominant trees twenty years following complete overstory removal USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis

Powered By Powered by: USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis

Midstory Present, No Yellow-Poplar Seed Source Density of Advance Seedling Reproduction by Species and Height Class (ft) prior to complete overstory removal Species Small Medium Large Total (< 2 ft tall) (2 to 4 ft tall) (> 4ft tall) Red Maple 600 600 300 1500 Sugar Maple 300 300 0 600 White Oak 200 100 0 300 Red Oak 300 150 20 470 A. Beech 200 150 130 480 Total 1600 1300 450 3350

Midstory Present, No Yellow-Poplar Seed Source Species composition of dominant/codominant canopy trees twenty years following overwood removal 10.3% 10.7% 8.5% red maple sugar maple beech 70.6% northern red oak

Midstory Present, Yellow-Poplar Seed Source Present Species composition of dominant/codominant canopy trees twenty years following overwood removal 8.6% 7.6% 11.3% 7.1% 65.4% red maple sugar maple beech yellow poplar northern red oak

No Midstory Present, Yellow-Poplar Seed Source Present Density of Advance Seedling Reproduction by Species and Height Class (ft) prior to complete overstory removal Species Small Medium Large Total (< 2 ft tall) (2 to 4 ft tall) (> 4ft tall) Red Maple 600 0 0 600 Sugar Maple 300 0 0 300 White Oak 200 100 0 300 Red Oak 300 150 20 470 A. Beech 200 0 0 200 Total 1600 250 20 1870

No Midstory Present, Yellow-Poplar Seed Source Present Species composition of dominant/codominant canopy trees twenty years following overwood removal 0.8% 0.4% 0.5% 18.7% 35.1% red maple sugar maple beech yellow poplar white oak northern red oak 44.4%

Shade tolerant understory and midstory trees removed, Yellow-Poplar Seed Source Present Density of Advance Seedling Reproduction by Species and Height Class (ft) prior to complete overstory removal Species Small Medium Large Total (< 2 ft tall) (2 to 4 ft tall) (> 4ft tall) Red Maple 0 0 0 0 Sugar Maple 0 0 0 0 White Oak 200 100 0 300 Red Oak 300 150 20 470 A. Beech 0 0 0 0 Total 500 250 20 770

Shade tolerant understory and midstory trees removed, Yellow-Poplar Seed Source Present Species composition of dominant/codominant canopy trees twenty years following overwood removal 33.3% yellow poplar white oak northern red oak 62.6% 4.1%

Simulating Regeneration Dynamics in Upland Oak Stands Simulations underscore: Importance of having competitive advance oak reproduction present prior to final overstory removal Powered By Powered by: Role of silvicultural treatments in controlling competing vegetation and enhancing the competitive position of oak reproduction USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station Dr. David Loftis

Evaluating Advance Oak Reproduction Evaluating the density, size, and species composition of advance reproduction is a critical step in planning regeneration systems like the shelterwood Successful regeneration of oak species typically requires a sufficient number of large, well-distributed advance reproduction prior to overstory removal Shelterwood overstory should not be removed until sufficient oak reproduction has developed.

Evaluating Advance Oak Reproduction Two approaches are generally used to evaluate levels of advance reproduction Fixed Radius Plot (i.e. plot count) Inventory Stocked Plot Inventory

Evaluating Advance Oak Reproduction Fixed Radius Plot (i.e. plot count) Inventory Typically completed in conjunction with large tree inventory Density of potential stump sprouting oaks determined from large tree inventory. Plot size usually 1/1000 acre (3.72 ft radius) to 1/200 acre (8.33 ft radius) Advance reproduction density summarized by species and height class

Evaluating Advance Oak Reproduction Stocked Plot Inventory Inventory determines the percentage of plots stocked with an advance reproduction stem of a specified species and size Density of potential stump sprouting oaks determined from large tree inventory Stocked plot percentage is then compared to a predetermined stocking percent benchmark Benchmark indicates the number of stocked plots typically necessary to result in successful regeneration of the target species or species group

SILVAH Oak Brose, Patrick H.; Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Horsley, Stephen B.; Knopp, Peter D.; Kochenderfer, James N.; McGuinness, Barbara J.; Miller, Gary W.; Ristau, Todd E.; Stoleson, Scott H.; Stout, Susan L. 2008. Prescribing regeneration treatments for mixed-oak forests in the Mid-Atlantic region. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-33. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station. 100 p

SILVAH Oak Regeneration Evaluation SILVAH Oak method uses data collected on: Desirable seedling regeneration Interfering plants Site quality Overstory shading Deer impact

SILVAH Oak Regeneration Evaluation SILVAH summarizes set of key decision variables Variables evaluated against thresholds according to the stocked plot concept For any key decision variable, a minimum, per-plot, threshold has been established and any plot exceeding that minimum threshold is considered stocked Established from research and forestry practice

SILVAH Oak Inventory Method Evaluating regenerative potential of mixed-oak stands must simultaneously consider species present, abundance, size, and spatial distribution of reproduction, and factors limiting successful regeneration SILVAH uses three nested plots Tree regeneration: 6 ft radius plot Obstacles to successful regeneration: 26 ft radius interference plot Overstory conditions: 10 BAF prism

SILVAH Oak: Regeneration Plot SILVAH simultaneously evaluates regeneration abundance and size by the stocked plot approach Regeneration rooted in 6 ft plot is tallied using weighted counts into ten categories Stem counts for the different species groups are adjusted for size and are recorded as weighted counts

SILVAH Oak: Regeneration Plot Competitive Oak: Stump sprouts or stems >3 feet tall OR with a root collar diameter (RCD) >0.75 inches. Established Oak: Count all stems 0.5 3 feet tall OR with RCD 0.25 0.75 inches. New Oak: Count all stems <0.5 foot tall and a RCD <0.25 inches

SILVAH Oak: Regeneration Plot Black cherry: Count all seedlings 2 inches tall with 2 normal-sized leaves. Stems > 1 foot tall are counted twice. Yellow-poplar: Same as black cherry. Ignore if oak site index <65. Conifers: Count any hemlock, pine, or spruce seedling with 2 whorls OR 0.5-1 foot tall. Stems w/ 3 whorls or >1 foot tall are counted twice. Other desirables: Same as black cherry. Maples must pass the tug test. For hickory and walnut, count all stems meeting established oak criteria; stems meeting competitive oak criteria are counted twice.

SILVAH Oak: Regeneration Plot Saplings: If a past disturbance has allowed regeneration to grow into saplings (1 to 6-inch d.b.h.), tally them if they are a desirable species, have good form and vigor, and meet one of these density thresholds: two stems less than 2.0 inches d.b.h. or one stem 2 to 6 inches d.b.h. Record the code of the dominant species. Residuals: Good quality stems 6-10 inches dbh that are the same age as main canopy and will be retained after final harvest. Record species code. Tall woody interference: Undesirable species more than 6 tall rooted in or near the plot. Record species code of the dominant stem.

SILVAH Oak: Interference Plot Interference plot assesses competing vegetation, deer impact, and site limitations Interference plot has 26-foot radius One interference plot with each regeneration plot

SILVAH Oak: Interference Plot Interference plot tally categories: Low Woody Interference: Visually group foliage of shrubs and undesirable trees less than 6 tall together. Estimate cover by 5% increments. Record percent cover and code of the dominant species. Fern (bracken, hay-scented, New York): Estimate percent cover by 5% increments. For other fern species, report half the cover. If >50% coverage, record in 10% increments. Grass and Sedge: Estimate percent cover by 5% increments. Record 1% even if only a trace of grass or sedge is present. Grapevine: Record the number of grapevines rooted in the plot. Site limitations: Record if present anywhere on the plot. 1= poor drainage, 2= rocky/thin soil, 3= thick duff.

SILVAH Oak: Interference Plot SILVAH uses five levels of deer impact to estimate browsing pressure Very low impact Low impact Moderate impact High impact Very high impact

SILVAH Oak: Overstory Plot Inventorying the overstory entails collecting basal area data by species, diameter, and stem quality. One overstory plot for every two regeneration plot The inventory can be inventoried using fixed-area or variable-radius sampling techniques

SILVAH Oak: Key Decision Variables Understory Regeneration Stocking SILVAH determines regeneration stocking for the species and species groups Number of qualifying stems recorded compared to stocked plot thresholds adjusted for site quality and deer impact

SILVAH Oak: Key Decision Variables

SILVAH Oak: Key Decision Variables Oak Stump Sprout Stocking An important source of oak regeneration is sprouting of the overstory oaks after they are harvested Sprouting probability of mature oaks varies considerably among the species and decreases as size class increases

SILVAH Oak: Key Decision Variables Oak stump sprout probability

SILVAH Oak: Key Decision Variables Oak Stump Sprout Stocking SILVAH estimates the number of stump sprouts from overstory data and sprout probabilities Estimated stocking percentages associated with sprout density

SILVAH Oak: Key Decision Variables Oak Stump Sprout Stocking

SILVAH Oak: Decision Making SILVAH Oak uses a series of decision charts to determine the regeneration status of a stand. The decision chats use a number of summary variables. Summary Variables Any Competitive Regeneration: A plot is stocked with Any Competitive Regeneration if it meets the stocking criteria for any of the regeneration categories except New Oak, Established Oak, Established Desirables, and Total Oak

SILVAH Oak: Decision Making Summary Variables (continued) Any Established Regeneration: A plot is stocked with Any Established Regeneration if it meets the stocking criteria for any of the regeneration categories except New Oak and Total Oak All Established Oak: A plot is stocked with All Established Oak if it meets the stocking criteria for Established Oak or Competitive Oak All Oak: A plot is stocked with All Oak if it meets the stocking criteria for New Oak, Established Oak, Competitive Oak, or Total Oak

SILVAH Oak: Decision Making Summary Variables (continued) Stocking of Regeneration Obstacles: Percentage of plots that are stocked with various kinds of interfering plants and site limitations Any Interference: A plot stocked with any of the interfering vegetation types is considered to be stocked with Any Interference.

SILVAH Oak: Key Decision Points 1. Any Competitive Regeneration > 69% Final removal cut for mixed hardwoods appropriate 2. Competitive Oak > 49% and Any Competitive Regeneration > 69% Final removal cut for mixed-oak regeneration appropriate 3. All Established Oak > 49%: High site quality (SI > 70): First removal cut of shelterwood appropriate Low to medium site quality (SI < 70): With Any Established Regeneration > 69%, final removal cut 4. All Established Oak < 49%, but All Oak > 50%: Preparatory cut, herbicide, and reinventory

Example Oak Regeneration Scenario 1 Regeneration Inventory found: 1. No Competitive Oak (0% stocked plots) 2. Few Established Oak (5% stocked plots) 3. Few All Oak (15% stocked plots) 4. High level of Tall Woody Interference 5. Site Limitation: Thick Duff Layer

No site limitations MDM = 23

Comp. oak = 0%

All Est. Oak = 5%

All oak = 15%

Oak sawlogs = 70 ft 2 ac -1 Thick Duff =30% Any Int. = 70% Deer Index = 2

Example Scenario 1: Recommended Prescription

Example Scenario 1: Recommended Prescription

Example Scenario 1: Recommended Prescription Herbicide Herbicide is an effective, safe and economical technique for removing vegetation that interferes with establishment and growth of oak regeneration. Five methods of herbicide application 1) Broadcast Spray 2) Cut and Spray 3) Stem Injection 4) Basal Application 5) Cut Stump

Example Oak Regeneration Scenario 2 Regeneration Inventory found: 1. Few Competitive Oak (15% stocked plots) 2. Moderate Established Oak (40% stocked plots) 3. All Oak (85% stocked plots) 4. High level of Tall Woody Interference

No site limitations MDM = 23

Comp. oak = 15%

All Est. Oak = 40%

All oak = 85% Stocking = 85% Interference = 70% Deer Index = 2

Example Scenario 2: Recommended Prescription

Example Scenario 2: Recommended Prescription