Nematological research

Similar documents
IMPACT OF NEMATODE MANAGEMENT OPTIONS ON POTATO CULTIVATION. Saad L. Hafez and P. Sundararaj

Table of contents. Introduction 2-3. Example crop rotations 4. Nematode resistant cover crops 5-7. Biofumigation solutions 8-9. Forage brassicas 10-11

FIELD CROPS NEMATODES

Lecture 13 - Different methods of Nematode Control

I I I I I I I I I I I I BIOECOLOGY AND BASIC IPM FOR POTATO NEMATODES. Saad L. Hafez and P. Slnndararaj

Nematodes in seed potato production: cuidado!

LONG-TERM MANAGEMENT OF NEMATODES Using Telone. Soil Fumigant

Volume XVII, Number 7 9 June Russ Ingham Department of Botany and Plant Pathology Oregon State University Corvallis, OR

Improve and protect your soil

Agricultural Innovations

Potato Nematodes. Figure 1. A Farm Guide to Nematode Diagnostics and Management Appendix B.

In Idaho, the first species of nematode was discovered in

A lfalfa nematodes. Idaho

ALFALFA NEMATODES: WHAT CAN BE DONE? Becky B. Westerdahl 1

NEMATODES OF ALFALFA AND THEIR MANAGEMENT. Saad L. Hafez and P. Sundararaj 1 ABSTRACT

Cover crops. Commercial growing of cover crop species. Paul Brown -- Kings

Crop Protection Research Institute

Plant Parasitic Nematode Analysis

Good Agricultural Practice in Organic Farming. Wijnand Sukkel 2004

Innovation in crop rotation for better IPM the Swiss model

Nematode Management in Field Crops

ROOT KNOT NEMATODE REPRODUCTION AND GALLING SEVERITY ON THIRTEEN VEGETABLE CROPS

Digesting 8 Years of Nematode Data from NW Raspberry Fields. Inga A. Zasada USDA-ARS Horticultural Crops Research Unit Corvallis, OR

MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER

Soybean Nematode Management

COVER CROP GUIDE

Soil Management and Fertilizer Use: Cover Crops

The Importance of Soil Fumigation: Nursery Crops

MID-ATLANTIC REGION CERTIFIED CROP ADVISER

Are invasive nematodes putting squeeze on Florida strawberries?

Research on Integrated Pest Management (IPM) for potato. Ian Toth, Alison Lees, Jennie Brierley, Roy Neilson & Damian Bienkowski

NEMATODE RESEARCH IN BERRY CROPS INGA A. ZASADA USDA-ARS HORTICULTURAL CROPS RESEARCH LABORATORY, CORVALLIS OR

Integrating co-innovation into research translation: developing a stakeholder-driven methodology

METAM SODIUM AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO METHYL BROMIDE FOR FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PRODUCTION AND ORCHARD REPLANTING

Corn and Soybean Disease Concerns

Organic Crop Production: Crop Rotation

Prepared by Mark Bell, Amanda Crump, Nick Madden and Maria Paz Santibanez 2012 For more information visit: International Programs ip.ucdavis.

The Northwest Berry Foundation's SMALL FRUIT UPDATE

Presented by : Digambar Singh

ORNAMENTALS NORTHWEST ARCHIVES

International Research and Development. Designing a Crop Rotation Plan with Farmers

Plant-parasitic nematodes are microscopic, unsegmented

Crop production in Ukraine. Natalia Rogovska

Introduction of potentially damaging nematodes in Florida strawberry fields with transplant material

Evaluation of New Chemical and Biological Nematicides on Strawberries and Vegetables. Johan Desaeger, University of Florida, GCREC

EVALUATION OF NEW FLUORINE-BASED NON-FUMIGANT NEMATICIDES IN FLORIDA

Managing Nematodes and Tomato Ring Spot Virus in Vineyards

Soybean IPM Elements Revised March, 2012

Does a reduction of organic matter input reduce nitrate leaching and crop yield?

Non-fumigant options for replant disease/nematode management

The Relationship of Plant Age, Soil Temperature, and Population Density of Heterodera schachfii on the Growth of Sugarbeet 1

No matter the weather conditions, there will be problematic diseases every year. Which disease may change from year to year.

Development of Plant Diseases Disease of a plant could simply be defined as any alteration of one or more of the ordered series of physiological

10/22/2008. AGRN 1003/1004 Dr. Weaver

INTERIM PROGRESS REPORT TO THE MAIZE TRUST

Why is Rhizoctonia increasing? Favorable weather Susceptible crops sown in rotations - Crops affect populations of R. solani in soil Management Rhizoc

Impact from Pratylenchus thornei, Macalister 2015

Haddish Melakeberhan. agriculturalnematology.anr.msu.edu/

Founded in Houston, TX as a biotechnological, innovative

WEED MANAGEMENT. DEVELOPMENT STAGES Most crop plants and weeds have four stages of development: LEARNING OBJECTIVES

Protylenchus penetrons as Influenced by Seedling Age at Inoculation

Flanders in the European Union

NEMATODE POPULATIONS ON ROUNDUP-READY COTTON IN FLORIDA

Nordiska jordbruksforskares frening (NJF)

AND HAZARD TO TUBER HEALTH

CASE STUDY EVIDENCE DAVID HADFIELD FOR HORTICULTURE NEW ZEALAND 29 AUGUST 2014

Control of Nematodes in Tomato with Paecilomyces lilacinus Strain 251

Effect of Forage and Grain Pearl Millet on Pratylenchus penetrans and Potato Yields in Quebec 1

germinal.com Catch Crops The benefits, management and their role in compliance

AppDate 3.0. Estimation of consistent application dates dependent on BBCH crop development stages for FOCUS models

INSPECTION OF SEED POTATOES

crops following Sudangrass can expect a 20-35% average increase in stand counts.

1. LEGAL STATUS OF THE FARM (to confirm, write ``x``)

Cover Crops in Vegetable Production Systems

Cover Crops. Brendan Paul Connecting agri-science with farming

Ten years of biofumigation research in Switzerland

The research of the SCRI Nematology Group has

Greenhouse Studies on the Effect of Marigolds (Tagetes spp.) on Four Root-knot Nematode Species (Meliodogyne spp.)

Crop Statistics in Germany

NEW APPROACHES TO CONTROL DISEASES IN ONIONS AND POTATOES

Residue for Cover Crops in RUSLE2

BEFORE USING ANY PESTICIDE STOP READ THE LABEL I Prepared by Furney A. Todd, Extension Professor of Plant Pathology North Carolina State University at

The Role of Cover Crops with Biofumigation Potential for the Suppression of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Vineyards

Case studies for stakeholder-driven (co)innovation. Julie Ingram, CCRI, University of Gloucestershire, UK

Managing Nematodes for the Non-Commercial Vegetable Garden 1

Managing Soil Health for Nematode Control

Additional declaration on the phytosanitary certificate without prejudice to prohibition of imports

Tomato Production Guide for Florida: Nematode Control 1

Effective and selective control of plant parasitic nematodes with Paecilomyces lilacinus 251

TerraLife. - Soil is living -

IR-4 Western Regional Workshop. Dead Microbial Nematicides

CARIBBEAN FOOD CROPS SOCIETY

Plant Resistance in Nematode Pest Management 1

Environmental influences on plant health

Oregon Pasture Seed Production. Thomas G Chastain Oregon State University

Global warming potential of Swiss arable and forage production systems

JECAM Guidelines for cropland and crop type definition and field data collection

Mississippi Fresh Produce Availability Calendar

Location of project: ADAS High Mowthorpe, UK and ClearDetections, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Netherlands Training Placements 2017

Transcription:

Nematological research July 2013, PPO-AGV Lelystad Hans Hoek

Division of this presentation General introduction Nematode Control Strategy (NCS) Dutch Nematode Schedule ( Aaltjesschema ) Research example: Field research to determine crop damage and host-status of 4 crops and the nematode Trichodorus similis

Nematodes: general introduction A healthy soil contains 40.000 nematodes per kg > 2700 species water animals useful nematodes (feeding with: fungi, bacteria, dead organic material, control of slugs or insects etc.) plant parasites the exception on the rule

5400 x

Nematode catching fungi

Carnivorous nematodes

Stylet: a plantparasitic nematode

Nematode problems in the Netherlands Heavy soils Potato cystnematode Beet cystnematode Spiral nematode Stem nematodes Sandy soils Rootknot nematode Rootlesion nematode Trichodorids Xiphinema Longidorus

Direct damage by nematodes yield quality quarantine

Indirect damage by nematodes Verticillium ( wilting ) in potato corky ringspot or spraing in potato

Dispersion machinery Planting material Wind

Nematode Control Strategy Prevention planting material hygiene Inventory soil type, history crop inspection soil sampling pathotypes Crop Rotation sequence cultivar frequency green manure Additional soil fumigation granular nematicides catch crops biological control

Nematode Control Strategy Prevention planting material hygiene

Tuber filled with females and eggmasses

Nematode Control Strategy Prevention planting material hygiene Inventory soil type, history crop inspection soil sampling pathotypes

Inventarisation

Stemnematode Ditylenchus dipsaci

Symptoms Meloidogyne chitwoodi Meloidogyne hapla

Historical information

Science based sampling strategies

Nematode Control Strategy Prevention planting material hygiene Inventory soil type, history crop inspection soil sampling pathotypes Crop Rotation sequence cultivar frequency green manure

M. chitwoodi experimental field, Smakt 2002 Dream: Green manure summer and autumn Preparation of population levels research 2003 Characterisation of Dutch MC populations

Effect crop rotation on damage and multiplication year Crop sugar beet 1997 potato 1998 bean 1999 sugar beet 2000 oat 2001 bean 2002 carrot 2003 beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii - - - - - Northern root knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla - Maize root knot nematode Meloidogyne chitwoodi - R? - R root lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans cereal root lesion nematode Pratylenchus crenatus free living nematode Trichodorus similis? hostplant suitability unknown - - active decline of nemetodes - non host l poor host l l moderate host l l l good host R hostsuitability depending on crop variety white green yellow orange purple damage unknown no damage little damage (5-15 %) even with high numbers of nematode damage (15-33 %) with high numbers of nematodes serious damage even with low numbers of nematodes

Nematode Control Strategy Prevention planting material hygiene Inventory soil type, history crop inspection soil sampling pathotypes Crop Rotation sequence cultivar frequency green manure Additional soil fumigation granular nematicides catch crops biological control

Soil fumigation (max 1:5 ) Application of Monam (a.i. 510 g metam sodium /liter) 300 l/ha Potatoes (seed, table, starch potatoes) Sugar-beet Onions 600-750 l/ha Strawberry and vegetables in open field Perennials in open field Cut flowers in open field Nursery stock in open field Bulb flower and flower bulb crops Replanting of fruit trees 700 l/ha Weed control: yellow nutsedge

Soil fumigation 12000 Use MYCPP95 MYCPP2000 10000 1000 kg a.i. 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 84-88 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 2005 bron: Nefyto

Biological soil fumigation

Inundation

Tagetes: catch crop against Pratylenchus penetrans

Longterm effects of Tagetes on P. penetrans P. pentrans besmetting in larven per 100 ml grond 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Facelia Tagetes Carrot Italian ryegrass 1998 1999 2000 2001 Sampling Bemonsteringstijdstip in het voorjaar na de teelt

Dutch Nematode Schedule ( Aaltjesschema ) Information system about: Host status of crops for nematodes Damage of crops caused by nematodes for: arable crops, field grown vegetables, bulb crops, green manure crops, some perennials available on internet for free

Resistance Resistance: ability of the crop (or a cultivar) to reduce multiplication of nematodes. Very high resistance: very low or no multiplication Non-host: no multiplication at all Related term: susceptibility Low resistance = highly susceptible (high multiplication)

Sensitivity for damage Sensitivity: magnitude of the damage caused by nematodes (yield loss) Related term: tolerance Low sensitivity = highly tolerant (little or no yield loss)

Host status of a crop (multiplication of the nematode)? AA - R S? i Host status unknown active control natural decline poor host moderate host good host variety depended serotype depend. some information as black fallow serotype of tobacco rattle virus (TRV)

Host status

Damage to a crop (yield loss due to nematode infection) Damage (yield loss) unknown none little (5-15 %) moderate (15-33% strong (> 33 %)

Damage research

Resistance and sensitivity (extremes) resistance sensitivity Very low Very high Very low (no damage) Very high (much damage)

Effect crop rotation on damage and multiplication year Crop sugar beet 1997 potato 1998 bean 1999 sugar beet 2000 oat 2001 bean 2002 carrot 2003 beet cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii - - - - - Northern root knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla - Maize root knot nematode Meloidogyne chitwoodi - R? - R root lesion nematode Pratylenchus penetrans cereal root lesion nematode Pratylenchus crenatus free living nematode Trichodorus similis? hostplant suitability unknown - - active decline of nemetodes - non host l poor host l l moderate host l l l good host R hostsuitability depending on crop variety white green yellow orange purple damage unknown no damage little damage (5-15 %) even with high numbers of nematode damage (15-33 %) with high numbers of nematodes serious damage even with low numbers of nematodes

Nematode information? Go to: ww.aaltjesschema.nl

Field research with Trichodorus similis Belongs to the group of free living nematodes ; Trichodorus and Paratrichodorus species Also known as stubby root nematodes For several crops host-status is unknown

Stubby-root nematodes in the Netherlands wide host range crop damage in: arable crops, field grown vegetables, flower bulbs most important species in the Netherlands: P. teres, P. pachydermus, T. primitivus, T. similis crop damage: direct: yield loss, decreasing product quality indirect: transmitting tobacco rattle virus (TRV).

direct damage in sugarbeet by Trichodorus spp.

direct damage in potato by Trichodorus spp.

Infection of stolons by Trichodorus nematodes

Trichodorus damage in onion

Trichodorus damage in carrot

T. similis: effect on maize (due to host status of green manure crops) Pré manure crop: Oil radish Pré manure crop: White mustard

indirect damage by Trichodorus spp. spraing in potato by tobacco rattle virus

Reasons for damage research T. similis most common stubby-root nematode in the Netherlands inventory study 2005: 425 sampled parcels infected by T. similis: all over the country (six regions): 12 percent regions mainly sandy soils: 20 30 percent several important agricultural and horticultural crops: magnitude of damage unknown little or no information about host status

General information damage research T. similis Funded by the Agricultural Board (PA) and the Horticultural (PT) Board in the southeast of the Netherlands (Vredepeel) action period of the year year search for parcel infected by T. similis spring 2006 2007 2008 creation different infection levels of T. similis summer - autumn 2006 2007 2008 cultivation of potato, sugar beet, carrot, black salsify spring next winter 2007-2008 2008-2009 2009-2010

Research aims crops: potato, sugar beet, carrot, black salsify relation between degree of soil infection by T. similis and yield loss yield loss at high infection levels damage threshold multiplication of T. similis (host plant status)

Infection levels of T. similis (2007-2009) treatments chemical disinfection biological disinfection number of T. similis per 100 ml soil 3 a 41 b (black) fallow 148 c Marigold (Tagetes) 218 d Perennial ryegrass 265 d White mustard 404 e

black salsify: crop in June 2007 Treatment in 2006: Chemical disinfection White mustard Biological disinfection

Lineair damage relation 100 80 leverbare opbrengst 60 40 20 schadedrempel 0 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 aantal aaltjes per 100 ml grond

Seinhorst damage relation Damage parameters: T, Y max, m damage threshold (T) maximum yield (Y max) minimum yield (Y min) Yield loss relative minimum yield (m): ( Y min/ Y max )

exponential multiplication of nematodes 2007-2009 Maximum final population (M) Multiplication at low infection levels (a)

damage relation of T. similis in potato 2007-2009 damage parameters 2007 2009: - tolerance threshold: 5 T. similis per 100 ml soil - maximum yield loss 2007: 18 % 2008: 27 % 2009: 12 % on average: 19 % (figure)

multiplication of T. similis in potato 2007-2009 Predicted maximum final (Pf) populaton (M) at harvest: 283 T. similis per 100 ml soil

damage relation of T. similis in sugarbeet 2007 -- 2009 damage parameters 2007 2009: - tolerance threshold: none - maximum yield loss 2007: 5 % 2008: 11 % 2009: 8 % on average: 9 %

multiplication of T. similis in sugarbeet 2007-2009 Predicted maximum final (Pf) populaton (M) at harvest: 294 T. similis per 100 ml soil

damage relation of T. similis in black salsify 2008 damage parameters 2007 2009: - tolerance threshold: none - maximum yield loss 2007: 21 % 2008: 11 % 2009: 2 %

multiplication of T. similis in black salsify 2007-2009 Predicted maximum final (Pf) populaton (M) at harvest: 130 T. similis per 100 ml soil

damage relation of T. similis in carrot 2007 damage parameters 2007 2009: - tolerance threshold: * - yield loss: none

multiplication of T. similis in carrot 2007-2009 Predicted maximum final (Pf) populaton (M) at harvest: 70 T. similis per 100 ml soil

conclusions crop crop sensitivity to T. similis ( worst case ) host plant status for T. similis potato quite high good sugar beet low good carrot not poor black salsify quite high moderate

(implications for) www.aaltjesschema.nl Host plant suitability? hostplant suitability unknown - - active decline of nemetodes - non host l poor host l l moderate host l l l good host R hostsuitability depending on crop variety Sensitivity to damage (yield loss) white damage unknown green no damage yellow little damage (5-15 %) even with high numbers of nematode orange damage (15-33 %) with high numbers of nematodes purple serious damage even with low numbers of nematodes Aaltjesschema potato sugar beet carrot black salsify Trichodorus similis Trichodorus similis

Trichodorus host-status on important crops Trichodorus primitivus Trichodorus primitivus Trichodorus similis Trichodorus similis Paratrichodorus pachydermus Paratrichodorus pachydermus Paratrichodorus teres Paratrichodorus teres Tobacco Rattle Virus potato S sugarbeet S onion? - S winter wheat? S spring barley? S tulip? carrot S? AA Host status unknown active control natural decline - poor host moderate host good host R variety depended S serotype depend.? i some information Damage (yield loss) unknown none little (5-15 %) moderate (15-33% strong (> 33 %)

Thanks for your attention