Northern deciduous forest as wildlife habitat. Tom Paragi Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fairbanks

Similar documents
Stand Level Ecological Guidelines

Managing Forested Wildlife Habitats

Avian Habitat Considerations in Northern Hardwoods Silviculture

Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order

Vancouver Island Land Use Plan Higher Level Plan Order

Appendix A: Vegetation Treatment Descriptions and Unit Specific Design Criteria

natural landscape, in particular throughout the boreal forest. In an effort to better understand

Clara Unit Card. Alternative 2 Acres: 19 Treatment Acres: 6 Stand Age: 106 Primary ELT: 16. Primary Treatment: Single-Tree Selection

Appendix Y. ELC and Wildlife Species Habitat Analysis

3.15 SNAG AND SNAG ASSOCIATED SPECIES

Riparian Forest Ecology & Management. Derek Churchill, Nov 8, 2014

Wildlife Habitat as it relates to Forestry

Forest Stewardship Plan

Appendix C. Consistency With Eastside Screens. Salvage Recovery Project

What is Forestry? Defining a Forest 14/05/2018. What do you think of when you hear, forest? What do you think of when you hear, forest?

NORTHERN FLYING SQUIRREL

Appendix J-1 Marking Guidelines Alternative 4 GTR 220

AN OVERVIEW. September Ministry of Forests Forest Practices Branch

Silviculture Art & science of establishing & tending trees & forests

Developing forestry practices. Managing for Timber and Wildlife Diversity NATIONAL WILD TURKEY FEDERATION PRE-HARVEST PLANNING:

Conifer restoration on the Duncan-Lardeau Flats Wildlife Properties. January 2006

Peter H. Singleton John F. Lehmkuhl. USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Wenatchee Forestry Sciences Lab

NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRDS

MICHGIAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WILDLIFE DIVISION. Management Plan for the Halifax Grouse Enhanced Management Site

Forest Biomes. Chapter 9

Lab 13: Introduction to Cartographic Modeling

Dear Interested Party,

Managing Forests For Wildlife 3/13/2017 1

MANAGING PONDEROSA AND DRY MIXED- CONIFER FORESTS FOR WILDLIFE: HABITATS, BIO-DIVERSITY, FOOD WEBS

ATTACHMENT 4: DESCRIPTION OF TREATMENT TYPES MESABI PROJECT

SILVICULTURE SILVICULTURE 10/8/2018. Ecological forestry (Ecosystem management)

Kurtis Robins District Ranger US Forest Service 138 S Main

Compartment Review Presentation

SILVICULTURE & WILDLIFE HABITAT MANAGEMENT

Provincial Wildlife Tree Policy and Management Recommendations

PRINCIPLES OF SILVICULTURE FWF 312 SOME SELECTED SILVICULTURAL DEFINITIONS

Science affects the way we think together. Lewis Thomas BOREAL BLENDING: TIMBER AND MOOSE IN ALASKA S INTERIOR

Habitat Quality Models, Species at Risk, and Wildlife VECs Presentation for the Clean Environment Commission Keeyask Generation Station Hearings

Forest & Range Evaluation Program

APPENDIX K HABITAT NEEDS: THE PILEATED WOODPECKER AND OTHER PRIMARY CAVITY EXCAVATORS

Compartment Review Presentation

Omineca Regional Wildlife Tree Patch (WTP) Retention Guideline

Streamside zones, or riparian

Impacts of hyperabundant moose on forest regeneration in Terra Nova and Gros Morne National Park

ROCK CREEK FUELS AND VEGETATION PROJECT FORESTED VEGETATION ANALYSIS Karl Fuelling 9/18/2015

Wildlife Habitat Management on State Land

ORDER UNGULATE WINTER RANGE #U2-005

This Notice applies to the Squamish Forest District. Schedule 1. 1) Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus) Amount:

Salvage logging and habitat conservation

FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR. Al Malone 12 Pinedale Ave. Jamestown, MD MD GRID: 949,000 / 158,000 LOCATION

The State of Forestry in Minnesota (MN SAF Webinar)

Appendix J. Forest Plan Amendments. Salvage Recovery Project

Aspen and Oak Community Response to Restoration. Bobette Jones Coye Burnett

SFM Indicator 2 Key Sub-Indicator Field Monitoring Procedures

Draft Forest Land Use Plan for Long Term Value Added Negotiated Sale/NC-1591-F. Units 1, 2, 5 and 6. State of Alaska. Department of Natural Resources

FISHER. Scientific Name: Martes pennanti columbiana Species Code: M-MAPE. Status: Blue-listed

Overland Park, KS Stream Riparian Corridor Quality Evaluation

Density Management and Biodiversity. Joan Hagar USGS-FRESC

Chapter 11 B. Case study: Grouse Management at the Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia

Nez Perce National Forest Moose Creek Ranger District

Each point here will be imaged with airborne LiDAR and visited by crews to measure trees and their condition.

Bartlett Experimental Forest Network

FORESTRY TALK: A GLOSSARY OF COMMON TERMS

Haida Gwaii Land Use Objectives Order. Consolidated Version 1 For Communication Only. Background

The role of forest disturbance in habitat relationships and population ecology of Spruce Grouse.

NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE CONSERVATION PRACTICE STANDARD FUEL BREAK. (Ac.) CODE 383

8) Which of the following species is best adapted to poorly drained sites? a) Bur oak b) Eastern red cedar c) Black ash d) Yellow birch

TABLE OF CONTENTS 5.0 FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING...

Bird Response to Forest Management. Chris Moorman, PhD Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology NCSU

Appendix C Site Specific Mitigation Measures for All Alternatives

Sonoma Land Trust. Working Forest, Sustainable Forestry, Forest Certification What Do They Mean?

Dear Interested Party:

Responsible Forest Management IS Wildlife Management

BALANCING THE BOREAL APP: CLASSROOM ACTIVITY

Black Spruce- Lowland. Tower Birch Clearcut-w/Reserves Adjacent 6/5/2019

14. Sustainable Forestry Principals

Spruce and aspen regeneration following variable retention harvests at EMEND

THE SUCCESSION RACE. OBJECTIVE Students will list the factors that affect succession in a boreal forest.

Wildlife Habitat & Forest Resource Management Plan. Hickory Hills Park and Casey s Paha

LAKE STATES WOODLANDS

HAU FIELD INVENTORY PROCEDURES

3.1 Forest Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat

Forest Resources of the Black Hills National Forest

Dwarf Mistletoe Biology and Management in Southeast Region

Bipole III- Manitoba Hydro

Managing near Vernal Pools using Good Forestry in the Granite State

environmental excellence and sustainability C reating Biodiversity in the Oil Sands A Case Study Chris Fordham December 5, 2012

Q&A: Omineca spruce beetle outbreak May 4, 2018

Scoping Packet. Pre Commercial Thinning CE Contact: Greg Roberts Wrangell Ranger District P.O. Box Bennett St. Wrangell, AK 99929

A Case Study of Habitat Conservation Plans and the Protection of Snags and Coarse Woody Debris on Industrial Forest Lands 1

Cheat Mountain Wildlife Habitat Enhancement

SPECIES AND STAND DYNAMICS IN THE MIXED-WOODS OF QUEBEC'S BOREAL FOREST: A GUIDE FOR ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT

FINAL WILDLIFE and VEGETATION RESOURCES STUDY PLAN. Blue Lake Hydroelectric Project FERC No Expansion. Prepared by:

Wildlife Benefits of Managed Timber

Nova Scotia Forest Inventory

Wildlife Management Intensity Standards

Small Mammals and Bats

What s New in NH Northern Hardwoods Silviculture the wildlife habitat elements

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Timber Inventory 2006

Wildlife Management Planning Guidelines for the South Texas Plains Ecoregion

Transcription:

Northern deciduous forest as wildlife habitat Tom Paragi Alaska Department of Fish and Game Fairbanks

Boreal food webs Pastor et al. 1996 Biodiversity and ecosystem processes in boreal forest. Pages 33-69 in Functional roles of biodiversity: a global perspective. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Deciduous forest provides cover and forage during early seral stages for mammalian herbivores and their predators, with increases in bird diversity as vertical structure and understory community develops (soft mast) Coniferous forest is dominated by invertebrate guilds and their avian predators while providing mast for rodents and herbivorous passerines (insects influence forest health)

Practical concepts of habitat Food, Water, Space, Cover, Arrangement Food (+ Space): ungulates require large changes in forage availability to cause population-level responses (e.g., survival) Cover + Arrangement : moose foraging in recent burns are less selective for preferred species with increasing distance from edge cover (implications for sale layout design)

Features of early-seral habitat (things to create when logging) Woody Forage (willow, aspen, paper birch, balsam poplar, cottonwood, red osier dogwood) Horizontal Cover (visual screen from avian and mammalian predators, wind screen) Vertical Cover (same as horizontal, plus shade) Herbaceous Vegetation (grazing forage, insect production for young birds)

Practical concepts of habitat selection Habitat selection is a disproportionate presence of an animal in a habitat type compared to its availability Density of a species in a habitat type is another proximate means gauge importance, but it has drawbacks Fitness (survival and reproduction) is the ultimate demonstration of habitat quality when gauging land use practices, but it requires life-history studies (expensive)

Townsend s warbler Chugach Mountains study 1990s Birds nested in large white spruce trees in stands of dense white spruce Steve Matsuoka

Steve Matsuoka photos Nests placed in large trees experienced lower predation rates than nests in smaller trees Nests placed higher in trees also experienced reduced risk of larval blowfly infestation in nestlings than lower nests What proportion of the landscape contains these large trees?

Features of late-seral habitat (things to retain when logging) Snags and Cavity Trees: avian hunting perches, avian and mammalian nesting Large Woody Debris: grouse drumming logs, hollow boles and windthrown trees with root wads (mammal dens) (Generally bigger is better because of rarity at the stand and landscape scales) Lichen substrate in conifer stands: individual trees or patches of ground that provide caribou winter forage

Balance stand initiation treatments with retention of late seral features: Northern flicker (Robert Ott) How many, what size, where in stand?

Use empirical data for deriving operational guidelines on size or density of habitat features Permanent Sample Plots U.S. Forest Service (Forest Inventory and Analysis) University of Alaska-Fairbanks (Packee / Malone) Bonanza Creek LTER (Juday) Research Projects on stand structure Tanana Chiefs Conference (monitoring of riparian buffers, pre-commercial thinning, and overstory release harvests) U.S. Forest Service (individual scientists) ADF&G (snag/cavity survey in upland forest)

Modeling the effects of creating fuel breaks on snags and cavity trees in upland forest near Fairbanks to answer a forest management question: What density and size of snags, cavity trees, and spruce rust brooms would be lost with shearblading treatments (clearcutting)? ADF&G, ADNR, and UAF Forest Sciences Department field studies during 2005 and 2006

Study design and sampling protocol ADNR Forestry digitized stand typing from 1978 aerial photos Stratified random sampling in GIS by stand type (public lands <200 m from roads for access) Visited 75 sites across 9 stand types in 2005 Two 40x50m subplots (nested plots of width 10, 20, 30, 40m): Bate et al. 1999, PNW-GTR-425

Minimum sample criteria for availability 13 cm dbh for snag (pole wood) any tree with cavity opening in the trunk >2.5 cm in horizontal or vertical dimension and deeper than its least width dimension (penetration into the sapwood required) Cored 3 largest trees of living cohort, GPS location, digital photo, measured features by hand or with Relaskop (ground truthing potential for remote sensing) Many cavities could not be viewed without climbing (not a study objective)

Sampling plots near Fairbanks 2005

Mean stand Stand type Size class n sites age (yrs) white spruce saw 10 151 white spruce pole* 1 -- black and white spruce saw / pole 10 124 black spruce, birch, aspen saw 8 88 white spruce, birch, aspen saw 10 120 white spruce, birch, aspen pole 10 65 birch, aspen, poplar saw / pole 10 77 conifer* / mix seed / sapling 10 77 deciduous seed / sapling 6 --

Decid-s/s Snag density by stand type WS/PB/QA-s BS/PB/QA-s PB/QA/BP-s/p B&WS-s/p Con/Mix-s/s WS/PB/QA-p Stand age decreases from left to right WS-s 100 80 60 40 20 0 Number / ha (95%CL)

Decid-s/s Number / ha (95%CL) Cavity tree density by stand type WS-s B&WS-s/p WS/PB/QA-s BS/PB/QA-s PB/QA/BP-s/p Con/Mix-s/s WS/PB/QA-p 40 30 20 10 0 Stand age decreases from left to right

Cavity trees (all stand types combined, n = 283) frequency 50 40 30 20 10 live tree hard snag soft snag 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 dbh (cm)

Cavity height by tree diameter (n = 192) 20 cavity height (m) 15 10 5 deciduous coniferous 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 dbh (cm) Cavity opening by tree diameter (n = 187) 1200 cavity opening (cm 2 ) 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 deciduous coniferous dbh (cm)

Shape and size of cavity openings by decay class (n = 187) cavity opening (cm 2 ) 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 width:height live tree hard snag soft snag

Follow-up evaluations of draft operational guidelines are needed to confirm habitat quality Habitat selection studies (wildlife use of retained late-seral features compared to their availability in the larger landscape) Demonstrated fitness of animals using features (survival to breeding age)

tom_paragi@fishgame.state.ak.us 907-459-7327 Questions and Discussion Northern hawk owl