Economic Models for Environmental Sustainability Anaerobic Digesters and a Complimentary Energy Decision Support Tool.

Similar documents
Brent Gloy, April

Sustainable financing and policy models for composting projects

Biogas Policy Recommendations

Landfill Gas Utilization. Update on Sale of Landfill Gas

Canadian Biogas Metrics Study: Quantifying the Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits of Biogas Energy in Canada

Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant Biogas Cogeneration Proposal from Toronto Hydro Energy Services

Canadian Biogas Study: Quantifying the Energy, Environmental and Economic Benefits of Biogas in Canada

Review of Agricultural Economics Volume 24, Number 2 Pages

Techno-economic Analysis of Farm Scale Plug-flow Anaerobic Digestion

Carbon Footprints 1 of 18 Boardworks Ltd 2016

Economics of Dry Batch Digestion for Small Municipalities An Alberta Case Study

Manure Digester Biogas

GREEN INITIATIVES FOR THE SWINE SECTOR

CARBON FORESTRY OVERVIEW

Methane and California s Livestock Operations. Rachel Tornek, Policy Director California Methane Symposium, Los Angeles March 12, 2015

The Economic Potential of Methane Recovery for Swine Operations: Projected Impacts of Various Public-Policy Scenarios

Organics to Energy Program

Case Study: Biogas generation from

Project Idea Note (PIN)

COGEN 3 Technical Financial Analysis Model

Advancing Energy Independence with Environmental Benefit: Livestock Manure Digesters. Chris Voell, National Program Manager AgSTAR Washington, DC

California Dairy Sustainability Summit. November 27-28, 2018 California Dairy Sustainability Summit

Economic Feasibility of Anaerobic Digestion To Produce Electricity on Florida Dairy Farms 1

Handout - Item 4. B) EFW-WMAC September 28, The Regional Municipality of Durham s Organic Management Strategy

Robbie Louw Director Promethium Carbon South Africa

in the Pacific N o r t h w e s t

The Role of Agriculture and Forestry In Emerging Carbon Markets

US Biogas Industry Development Indications for Biomethane

Michigan State University Consumers Energy Company Project Phase 1

Welcome. RETScreen s Clean Energy Policy Toolkit. Clean Energy Solutions Center Webinar 26 April 2013

DATE: July 10, 2018 REPORT NO. PW Chair and Members Committee of the Whole Operations and Administration

Bioenergy Projects for Agribusiness Bioenergy Australia Biogas Workshop - Gold Coast

Agrienergy Producers Association of Ontario. benefits, applications, challenges and opportunities for n ntario. biogas

REVIEW OF HPP ZHUR FEASIBILITY STUDY INCLUDING PREPARATION OF PRELIMINARY EIA AND PRELIMINARY SA

Energy from digester gas. Optimised biogas utilisation

Climate Change Mitigation Potential in the Solid Waste Management Sector in Developing countries: Case study in Hanoi city, Vietnam

The Importance of Landfill Gas Capture and Utilization in the US

Toronto Zoo issues Request for Proposals (RFP) May 3, 2010 for the construction of a Biogas Facility May 3, Questions and Answers

Production from Organic Residues. Biogas

Climate Change and Ontario Agriculture

Assessment of Environmental Impacts from On-farm Manure Digesters

Title. Green Government Initiative March 20 22, 2013

(c) Tertiary Further treatment may be used to remove more organic matter and/or disinfect the water.

ENABLING PROFITABLE GENERATION OF LOW CARBON FUELS

Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute Centre for Research and Technology Hellas

Welcome / Bienvenue. RETScreen Training Institute RETScreen 101 Introduction to Clean Energy Project Analysis

UNDA RENEWABLE ENERGY ESCWA PIPELINE PROJECTS

9/20/2017 FROM TRASH TO GAS EQUALS CASH

PROGRESS REPORT: COMMUNITY CLIMATE CHANGE LOCAL ACTION PLAN - PHASE 2

A n O ve r v i e w o f O t h e r J u r i s d i c t i o n a l A p p ro a c h e s t o C a r b o n A P A S C a r b o n S u m m i t.

Geothermal Hot Water Supply of Saburtalo District in Tbilisi, Georgia

ener g integrated CH 4 solutions

Manure-based Anaerobic Digestion In New York State: Where we were, Where we are, and Where we can be

Reform of energy subsidies The Asian experience

Value? Depends on who you are: The CSI Site

Challenges for Renewable Energy Finance

BUSINESS PROSPECT - BIOGAS PLANTS IN DENMARK

Focus on Energy s Biogas Feasibility Study Grants for Anaerobic Pretreatment and Anaerobic Digester Facilities

Carbon Market Institute Business Roundtable. Tas Sakellaris Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency

REMI Macroeconomic Analysis of the Baja Climate Action Plan

MONOAGENT HEATING SYSTEM FOR SOLITARY CONSUMERS, USING HEAT FROM BIOMASS BURNING

MARIN CLEAN ENERGY. introducing. MCE How It Started 1/24/2011. Community Choice Aggregation. Policy. Grassroots. Public Surveys*

legislative framework

Australian carbon policy: Implications for farm businesses

green gas guide Helping biomethane producers get their gas into our grid

Biogas Solutions for America s Dairy Industry

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M. To: Council Members AGENDA ITEM 8

2006 Indiana Renewable Resources Study & Indiana s Baseload Resource Needs

Small Digester Feasibility in the Upper Midwest

BRE: Feed in tariff update Jonny Williams BRE Wales and South West. Part of the BRE Trust

Comparing the Carbon Emission Reductions from Various Clean Energy Projects

U.S. Climate Change Technology Program (CCTP) Overview

Keys Keys to to Successful Successful Operation Farm Based Digesters g

C l i m a t e - S m a r t A g r i c u l t u re i n C a n a d a N A C S A A. January 16, 2018

Anaerobic Digestion Plant in Tripoli, Libya- A Case Study

Linking Renewable Energy Promotion Policies with International Carbon Trade. Gareth Phillips Chief Climate Change Officer

FACING CLIMATE CHANGE. Webinar Ch. 4-7 March 2, 2017, Toronto Dianne Saxe

Feed-in Tariff Structure Development for the Kingdom of Bahrain for PV Electricity

A Checklist for Alberta s Climate Change Plan: What to Look for in a Comprehensive Action Plan for Alberta to Fight Global Warming

Agenda and Goals for Today

Alberta s Contribution. Alberta Party Caucus Climate Change Plan

Copyrights 2018 by International Financial Modeling Institute

A Simple and Energy Efficient Approach to Cleaning Biogas

NGA 2018 Regional Market Trends Forum Technologies to Decarbonize the Gas Network

Contaminant Removal Considerations for Anaerobic Digestion. National Composting Conference Halifax 2014

Net Project Value Assessment of Korean Offshore Floating Wind Farm using Y-Wind Semi Platform

What is the Greenhouse Gas Contribution from Agriculture in Alberta?

ADVANCES IN BIOGAS PROCESSING June 2013

Priority Axis 4: Supporting the Shift Towards a Low Carbon Economy in All Sectors; Guidance Advice. July 2016

The AgSTAR Program. Managing Manure with Biogas Recovery Systems. Improved Performance at Competitive Costs 1EPA

Are Wind and Sun the Same? Cost-effective Renewable Policies for Intermittent Energy Sources

ADDRESSING THE METHANE CHALLENGE AT CALIFORNIA S DAIRY FARMS. J.P. Cativiela Dairy Cares coalition

The Kern Dairy Biogas Cluster: A Case Study of the Emerging Dairy Methane Initiatives in California. October 12, 2017 AWMA Technical Conference

PACIFICORP: PRIVATE GENERATION RESOURCE ASSESSMENT FOR LONG TERM PLANNING

Municipal Project Development Considerations. Mike Muffels MSc P.Eng. March 22, 2018

CO 2 and the energy balances of different treatment processes for biowaste

Waste to Energy Untapped Opportunity?

WP 3.3: Policy Roadmap for large-scale biogas implementation in Latvia

U.S. Regional Approaches to Energy Policy and CO 2 Mitigation

Waste-to-Energy Potentials in Grenada

Transcription:

Economic Models for Environmental Sustainability Anaerobic Digesters and a Complimentary Energy Decision Support Tool By: Rob Anderson

Anaerobic Digestion Anaerobic digestion uses anaerobic bacteria to breakdown organic material, in the absence of oxygen to produce biogas Biogas which is approximately 40% methane can be used to replace fossil fuel derived energy Organic materials used in AD systems emit significant greenhouse gases (GHG) when not treated, and mitigation of these emissions is an additional environmental benefit

The Motivation Ontario s s Green Energy Act aims to increase the use of renewable energy sources to combat climate change. The Ontario Power Authority s s Feed In Tariff Program provides a comprehensive guaranteed pricing structure for renewable electricity production The economics of anaerobic digesters for Ontario farmers is not very well known

Economic Feasibility Model for Anaerobic Digesters in Ontario Provides custom information to specific projects Estimates yearly cash flows to give the user a multi period forecast of the finances of there project Key variables are easy to alter, does not require sorting through calculations to change these values Can potentially provide policy information by determining the impact of changes in specific variables through the use of sensitivity analysis.

Highlights of Original Spreadsheet Two cases; single fuel case (methane only), and dual fuel case (methane plus diesel fuel) which both have a continuous operation scenario, and d a peak hours operation scenario Estimates the potential electricity capacity Estimates the capital cost of the system Estimates the annual revenue generated Estimates annual costs Calculates the payback period

Overview of Additions Multi-period cash flows Accounts estimates such as inflation, financing, equipment wear, and costs for repairs Accounts for changes in Feed-in Tariff (FIT) prices, income and property taxes and claiming capital cost allowance (CCA). Allows for project duration and opportunity cost to be included Calculates net present value, internal rate of return, payback period, p average yearly net income, average return on equity and average return on investment

How the Economic Feasibility Calculator Works Central User Inputs Loan Amortization Schedule Advanced User Inputs Support Information Calculation Sheet 1 Calculation Sheet 2 Calculation Sheet 3 Summary Sheet

Collaboration Diagram

Life-cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economics of On- Farm Anaerobic Digesters Conducting on farm measurements and an environmental assessment of AD considering all aspects of its life-cycle. This proposed project will expand research from two on-going projects providing a unique opportunity to develop a critical mass on AD expertise in Ontario. Capital investment and operating costs as well as revenue streams for a sub-set set of the twenty five AD systems to be installed in Ontario over the next 2 years will be assessed. Evaluation of the impact of existing AD energy policies that generate environmental attribute, and assessment of the impact of green policies (i.e. carbon offset credits) on AD financial feasibility will also be carried out.

Thank You! Funding Provided by: OMAFRA Project: Life-cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economics of On-Farm Anaerobic Digesters Project Leader: Claudia Wagner-Riddle

Payback Period Calculated: Payback Period = Initial Investment/Average Net Income Payback Period = Equity of Investment/Average Net Income The year in which the cumulative cash flow equals zero Criteria: If payback is less then or equal to a specific time frame then it is a good investment Notes: Gives equal weight to all cash flows before the payback date and none to any after it

Net Present Value NPV=Net present value t= the number of years since the initial investment C t = Cash flow in year t C o = Initial investment r = Discount rate = Opportunity cost Criteria: If value is greater then zero, it is a good investment Notes: Dependent on the discount rate (r), which can be subjective.

Internal Rate of Return Internal Rate of Return= the value of the discount rate at which the Net Present Value is equal to zero. Criteria: If the Internal Rate of Return is higher then the opportunity cost, (r) then it is a good investment. Notes: Same with Net Present Value, dependent on the value given to the opportunity cost (r).

Indexed Contract Price

Calculations for CPI x and CPI y CPI BD and PE are imputed by user TCP BD is determined by Spreadsheet calculations CPI X for the first year is taken from CPI BD and the previous years CPI y for all remaining years CPI Y is calculated using the expected rate of inflation. Expected rate of inflation=(cpi y -CPI x )/CPI x CPI y = Expected rate of inflation*cpi x +CPI x