Class III In Situ Uranium Injection Wells and Aquifer Exemptions in Texas: Multiple Levels of Permitting Protection for USDW Protection

Similar documents
Regulation of In Situ Mining in Texas

This document also includes proposed permit requirements, including response actions, when excursions occur.

What s s New in Texas Uranium

Criteria for mapping brackish groundwater

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Proposed Rule Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings 40 CFR 192

UIC Program & Natural Gas Storage

URANIUM AND URANIUM PROGENY IN GROUNDWATER ASSOCIATED WITH URANIUM ORE BEARING FORMATIONS

Railroad Commission. Class II Underground Injection Control Program Aquifer Exemption Project. February 12, 2018

SOUTHWEST GROUNDWATER CONSULTING, LLC

Tennessee Underground Injection Control Program Overview

As uranium mines closed, state altered cleanup goals. Initial targets were unrealistic and unnecessary, companies say

40 CFR - Code of Federal Regulations - Title 40: Protection of Environment

Implementation of Underground Injection Control Program Regulations for Class V Shallow Disposal Systems

Detail on Concentrate Handling and Disposal Options

RECENT CHANGES TO LOUISIANA S UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL PROGRAM. By: Marjorie A. McKeithen and Brett S. Venn

Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Class I Injection Wells in Texas

Best Petroleum Explorations, Inc. M. Brad and Sandra Dixon Themselves PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Excursions of Mining Solution at the Kingsville Dome In-situ Leach Uranium Mine

Understanding The Class II Underground Injection Control Application Process In Colorado To Comply Cost-Effectively

And Now for Something Completely Different: Unusual Class V Wells in Texas

EPA s Underground Injection Control Program Overview. Solid Waste Advisory Committee Meeting June 5, 2014

Injection Wells. An injection well is a vertical pipe in the ground into which water, other liquids, or gases are

Aquifer Storage and Recovery: A Management Tool for Upstream Operators. Presented by: Lindsay Atkinson, PE James Dwyer, PE, D.W.R.

15A NCAC 02C.0219 AQUIFER STORAGE AND RECOVERY WELLS (a) Aquifer Storage and Recovery Wells are used to inject potable water for the purposes of

Impact of EPA ASR Letter on Florida s ASR Facilities

Oil and Gas Monitoring. November 2, 2016 GRA Meeting John Borkovich, P.G. Groundwater Monitoring Section Chief

How do States Define Usable Quality Groundwater?

Aquifer Exemptions. Ground Water Protection Council Conference 2015 UIC Annual Conference Austin, TX February 9-11

Permit Number: 1900B Expiration Date: July 15, 2021

The Critical Link between Aquifer Exemptions and the Sustainability of Water Resources as Part of Unconventional Resource Development

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 652. UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL

Research into the Characterization of Brackish Water and Disposal of Desalination Reject Water in Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs

Research into the Characterization of Brackish Water and Disposal of Desalination Reject Water in Saline Aquifers and Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs

AQUIFER STUDIES RELATED TO GEOLOGIC STORAGE OF CO 2

2017 Wyoming Uranium: An Overview. Wyoming Legislature Joint Minerals Committee June 29, 2017 Casper, Wyoming

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY. Health and Environmental Protection Standards for Uranium and Thorium Mill Tailings

("Commissioners Court") has the authority to act to protect the Health, Safety, and Welfare

WHEREAS, New Jersey s Legislature and Governor enacted a one-year moratorium on fracking that expired in January of 2013; and

State Baseline Water Quality Programs for Oil & Gas Operations

San Antonio. Water System BRACKISH GROUNDWATER DESALINATION PROJECT. Bill Stein, PG. LBG-Guyton Associates. San Antonio AMTA/AWWA 1

Railroad Commission of Texas. Victor G. Carrillo - Chairman Elizabeth A. Jones Commissioner Michael L. Williams Commissioner

AC : VALIDITY OF THE METHODOLOGY FOR ESTABLISH- ING BASELINE WATER QUALITY FOR URANIUM

Colorado s Groundwater Protection Program

ISL Mining in Kazakhstan and Technology Development Vienna, IAEA, April 2013

Client Alert. An Overview of EPA's New Rules Regulating the Underground Injection of Carbon Dioxide

Ordinance No. AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF BUTTE AMENDING CHAPTER 24, ENTITLED ZONING, TO PROHIBIT THE STORAGE OR DISPOSAL OF

EPA Primary. (mg/l as CaCO3) (mg/l as CaCO3)

Re: Contamination of Protected Underground Sources of Drinking Water; Request for Enforcement Action

Recent Legislative Changes Affecting the Texas Class V Injection Well Program

Suffolk County Highway Superintendents Association

DEEP INJECTION WELL CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION

Chaparral Natural Resources, Inc.

SUBCHAPTER 2L - GROUNDWATER CLASSIFICATION AND STANDARDS SECTION GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

ORDINANCE NO

Groundwater Fundamentals

Summary of Issues Strategies Benefits & Costs Key Uncertainties Additional Resources

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Groundwater and Surface Water Overview of the Lochend Area, Alberta

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) CLASS V WELL

RULE 68. DISPOSAL OF NATURALLY OCCURRING RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS (NORM) ASSOCIATED WITH THE EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION OF OIL AND GAS

Groundwater Replenishment with Purified Water Injection Provides Drought Protection & Environmental Benefits

CURIS RESOURCES (ARIZONA) INC. APPLICATION TO AMEND UIC PERMIT NO. AZ ATTACHMENT A AREA OF REVIEW SWVP

Class V Injection Wells: Back to the Future

REVIEW OF THE AQUIFER EXEMPTION PROCESS, HISTORY AND IMPLEMENTATION RELATED TO GROUNDWATER PROTECTION AND USE

Class V Experimental Well Permit Process Items & Potential Issues for Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Project

California Well Stimulation Treatment Regulations

A Technical Assessment of Protection of Underground Sources of Drinking Water under the UIC Rule and Aquifer Exemption Program

Dear Director Zehringer and Chief Simmers,

WM2012 Conference, February 26 March 1, 2012, Phoenix, Arizona, USA

2 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

OIL AND GAS DOCKET NO

Drilling for Natural Gas in the Marcellus and Utica Shales: Environmental Regulatory Basics

Report of the In-situ recovery of uranium Research Program to The Joint Minerals, Business, and Economic Development Interim Committee

STATE OF ARKANSAS ARKANSAS POLLUTION CONTROL AND ECOLOGY. REGULATION NO. 17 Effective May 4, 1989 Arkansas Underground Injection Control Code

DRINKING WATER. EPA Needs to Collect Information and Consistently Conduct Activities to Protect Underground Sources of Drinking Water

The Mineral Industry Environmental Protection Regulations

ANNUAL GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT FOR 2018 JAMES RIVER POWER STATION (JRPS) Prepared for:

Bob Van Voorhees Carbon Sequestration Council. GWPCUICMeeting Tulsa, Oklahoma February 12, 2018

Water - policy and government regulation for heavy oil and oilsands development

Virtual Curtain Limited

UNDERGROUND INJECTION AND SEQUESTRATION AND UNDERGROUND SOURCES OF DRINKING WATER (PROTECTING A VALUABLE RESOURCE)

EXAMINER S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

PROCEDURAL HISTORY EXAMINERS REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Department of Conservation Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Bill Bartling Inland District Deputy

Chapter 7 Shallow Ground Water Study Team

Drinking water systems producing solid waste are required under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

15A NCAC 02C.0225 GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION WELLS (a) Groundwater Remediation Wells are used to inject additives, treated groundwater, or ambient air

ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNTY OF PINELLAS, PROVIDING THAT THE PINELLAS COUNTY CODE BE AMENDED BY ADDING ARTICLE XIV

ISL mine Project and Planning - Feasibility Study -

RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS. Barry T. Smitherman, Chairman David Porter, Commissioner Buddy Garcia, Commissioner

Regulation of Mines In South Florida

Notice of Intent to Operate a Low-Volume Transfer Station

SENATE SPONSORSHIP. Bill Summary

Brackish Resources Aquifer Characterization System (BRACS)

Report to the Minnesota State Legislature: Additional Tools to Implement Groundwater Sustainability Requirements

Geologic Sequestration of Carbon Dioxide under the Safe Drinking Water Act s Underground Injection Control Program

Technical Memorandum Brackish Water Desalination for Public Water Supply in Las Cruces, New Mexico

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS DIVISION OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Filed with the Secretary of State on

Lecture 1: Introduction

Transcription:

Class III In Situ Uranium Injection Wells and Aquifer Exemptions in Texas: Multiple Levels of Permitting Protection for USDW Protection David Murry Geologist Radioactive Materials Division TCEQ

Historical Uranium discovered in South Texas in 1954 Surface mining began in 1960 in Karnes County; currently no active surface mines First in situ mining permit issued in 1975 by the Texas Water Quality Board (predecessor agency to TCEQ)

UIC Authorization Texas has an EPA-approved Underground Injection Control (UIC) Program EPA granted Texas primacy for its UIC program in 1982 Primacy is for Class I-V wells TCEQ regulates Class I, III, IV and V UIC Wells Railroad Commission of Texas regulates Class II and certain Class III UIC wells

Class III Permits 39 permits issued for in situ uranium mining since 1975 94 Production Areas authorized within 39 area permits since 1975 Seven active permits; 20 production areas at present time

Active Permits URI Kingsville Dome, Kleberg Co. (1986) URI Rosita, Duval Co. (1987) URI Vasquez, Duval Co. (1997) Mesteña Alta Mesa, Brooks Co. (2000) UEC/STMV La Palangana, Duval Co. (2008) Signal Equities Brevard, Bee/Live Oak County (2010) UEC Goliad Project, Goliad Co. (2011)

In Situ Uranium Mining Sites

Geologic Age of Mineralized Unit

Class III Injection Wells Class III injection wells used for in situ recovery of minerals In Texas, Class III wells have been used to recover uranium, sodium sulfate, and sulfur Currently in Texas, only uranium is being mined using Class III wells

In Situ Uranium Mining Uses a network of injection and production wells completed in a subsurface ore zone Injects oxygenated water (sometimes with added sodium carbonate and/or small amounts of acid) into the ore zone to dissolve uranium Pumps the uranium-bearing solution to the land surface for recovery and processing into the product yellow cake (U 3 0 8 ) Recycles the mining process water back into the ore zone for recovery of more uranium

Block Diagram of In Situ Uranium Mining Operation

In Situ Uranium Jurisdiction Texas Railroad Commission (TRRC): Issues permits for exploration wells Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Class III UIC Permits, Production Area Authorizations, and associated Aquifer Exemptions

Additional TCEQ Programs that apply at an In Situ Site Class I UIC injection wells for disposal of wastewater generated during mining process (Radioactive Materials Division) Air Quality Permitting (Air Permitting Division) Radioactive Materials License for Processing facility (Radioactive Materials Division)

Statutory and Regulatory For In Situ mining: Basis Texas Water Code, Chapter 27 Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 331: Standards for Class III wells: 331.81 331.86; 331.122 Standards for Production Area Authorizations: 331.101 331.109

Statutory and Regulatory Basis For storage and processing facility: Texas Health and Safety, Chapter 401 Title 30 of the Texas Administrative Code, Chapter 336

Underground Source of Drinking Water (USDW) An aquifer or a portion of an aquifer that: supplies drinking water for human consumption; or in which the groundwater contains fewer than 10,000 milligrams per liter of total dissolved solids, and is not an exempted aquifer

Basic Requirements of UIC Rules Pollution of USDWs by an injection well is prohibited. All injection wells must have permits or other authorization. Permits shall require any necessary conditions to prevent pollution of USDWs. Permits shall require financial assurance for well closure. Public participation and opportunity for contested case hearing is required in decisions on permits, production area authorizations, and aquifer exemptions.

Mining Authorization Process Two-step Process: Class III Well Area Permit Production Area Authorization for each ore body

Mine Area Schematic

Mine Area Schematic

Area Permits One permit issued for a defined area comprising the mine Multiple Class III wells authorized within defined area Wells are of similar design and operation Single operator for all wells

Permit Information Regional and local geology and hydrogeology Proposed well design, completion, and testing Proposed hydrologic testing program Proposed Mine Plan Proposed restoration procedures Aquifer Exemption

Production Area Authorization A document, issued under the terms of a class III injection well permit, approving the initiation of mining activities in a specified production area within a permit area. Several PAAs may be issued under a single Class III well area permit.

PAA Information Production area geology and hydrogeology Monitor wells Update Mine Plan Proposed Restoration Table Production Area map Proposed control parameters for groundwater monitoring Hydrologic Testing Financial Assurance

Mine Area Schematic

Schematic Plan View of Production Area Authorizations with Typical Well Arrays

Public Participation Notice of applications for permits and PAAs, and aquifer exemption requests published in local newspaper Notice mailed to landowners and mineral owners Notice mailed to adjacent landowners and mineral owners Notice mailed to government officials and interested parties

Public Participation Notice provides opportunity to comment on applications Comments are addressed in a Response to Comments that is sent to all commenters Notice provides opportunity to request a contested case hearing

Public Participation All hearings requests considered by TCEQ Commissioners If request is granted, case is referred to State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH) SOAH appoints an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) to conduct hearing

Public Participation ALJ determines parties to hearing ALJ sets hearing schedule, including discovery period, and place and duration of hearing After conclusion of hearing ALJ issues a Proposal for Decision (PFD) PFD provides ALJ s recommendations to TCEQ Commissioners

Public Participation TCEQ Commissioners consider recommendations in ALJ s PFD TCEQ Commissioners make final decision on applications Any hearing party may request TCEQ Commissioners reconsider their decision Any Party may challenge TCEQ Commissioner s decision in court

South Texas Uranium To date, all uranium deposits mined in South Texas using in situ methods occur in USDWs, although the water within the mineralized zones does not meet primary drinking water standards without treatment. At each of these sites, prior to mining, the area and zone to be mined required an exemption of the production zone from classification as a USDW.

Exempted Aquifer An aquifer or a portion of an aquifer that meets the criteria for a USDW, but which has been exempted from being a USDW in order to allow for injection of fluids. 40 CFR 146.4 30 TAC 331.13

Aquifer Exemption Criteria Water is not currently used for drinking, and Until the quality of the ground water is restored and the exempt status is removed, water will not be used for drinking because of its mineral or geothermal character, its depth or location, or its pre-existing contamination renders it impractical for treatment to make it fit for drinking.

Issuance of Aquifer Exemptions Requires approval by TCEQ and EPA Removes the specified portion of the aquifer from definition and regulation as a USDW Is a necessary complement to a UIC permit and production area authorizations before in situ uranium mining may begin

Mine Area Schematic

USDW Protection TCEQ permitting program is designed to protect USDWs from contamination In situ uranium mining fluids results in an increase in the concentrations of certain constituents (such as uranium, radium, and arsenic) in groundwater An aquifer exemption is needed for mining

USDW Protection at In Situ Uranium Mining Sites Mining fluids must be confined to production zone of mine area; operator pumps more water than is injected to direct flow of mining fluids from injection well to production wells Production zone and non-production zone monitor wells are sampled during mining and aquifer restoration to detect any excursions of mining fluids

USDW Protection at In Situ Uranium Mining Sites If groundwater monitoring indicates movement of injected mining fluids out of the production zone of the production area, operator is required to initiate procedures to reverse this movement; increased sampling frequency is required until excursion is remediated

Schematic Plan View of Production Area Authorizations with Typical Well Arrays

USDW Protection at In Situ Uranium Mining Sites Once mining in a production area is complete, aquifer restoration is required Groundwater in mined production area must be restored to pre-mining groundwater quality as established by baseline monitoring program

USDW Protection at In Situ Uranium Mining Sites Groundwater quality in mined aquifer must be restored to established baseline values for 26 groundwater quality parameters Once operator determines aquifer restoration has been achieved, aquifer must be monitored for one year to verify restoration is complete

Restoration Constituents Ca Cl As Uranium Mg NO 3 -N Cd Radium- Na F Fe 226 K SiO 2 Pb CO 3 TDS Mn HCO 3 ECond Hg SO 4 Alkalinity Mo ph Ammonia Se

USDW Protection at In Situ Uranium Mining Sites Natural conditions in the aquifer are chemically reducing; injection of mining fluids creates an oxidizing environment in which uranium and other constituents are mobilized. Oxidized zone is confined to Production Area where mining fluids are injected.

USDW Protection at In Situ Uranium Mining Sites Outwards from oxidized zone, natural reducing conditions exist Migration of any residual concentrations of constituents remaining after aquifer restoration would encounter these reducing conditions Reducing condition will result in precipitation of dissolved constituents and return to reducing conditions

Summary and Conclusions TCEQ has administered a Class III UIC permitting program for in situ uranium mining since 1975 TCEQ received EPA Primacy for its UIC permitting program in 1982 TCEQ has adopted statutes and regulations for administration of its Class III UIC Program

Summary and Conclusions TCEQ s Class III UIC permitting program allows and encourages public participation through: Public Notices Public Meetings Opportunity to provide public comment Opportunity for a contested case hearing

Summary and Conclusions The requirements of TCEQ s Class III UIC permitting program are designed to provide protection of USDW through: Confinement of mining fluids to production zone within production area Aquifer exemptions Groundwater monitoring for excursion detection Remediation of excursions Aquifer Restoration once mining is complete

Questions?

Contact Information David Murry, PG, Senior Geologist and Project Manager 512-239-6080 David.murry@tceq.texas.gov Lorrie Council, PG, UIC Permits Section Manager 512-239-6461 Lorrie.council@tceq.texas.gov Dale Kohler, PG, Executive Assistant to TCEQ Executive Director 512-239-6636 Dale.kohler@tceq.texas.gov