Cawood Water District Water Quality Report 2015

Similar documents
Cawood Water District Water Quality Report 2016

Pineville Water System Water Quality Report 2018

City of Hammond Mayson H. Foster Water & Sewer Department Garry Knight, Superintendent. The Water We Drink

2017 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT PWSID #: NAME: Borough of Pottstown Water Treatment Plant

Water System ID: KY Manager: Ed Fortner CCR Contact: Kevin Howard Phone:

West Cocalico Township Water Authority PWS ID#

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Data FONTANA WATER UTILITY, PWS ID:

Hilton Head Public Service District Water Quality Test Results for the period of January 1 to December 31, 2013

To request a paper copy call (270)

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Data MINERAL POINT WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

Consumer Confidence Report

2017 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT PWSID #: OLEY TOWNSHIP MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY

2016 Consumer Confidence Report Data SCHOFIELD WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

Consumer Confidence Report

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Data VALDERS WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

2014 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT

2017 WATER QUALITY REPORT

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

2016 Consumer Confidence Report Data BLAIR WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Town of Wise Water Treatment Plant PWSID #

2017 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT NAME: Minersville Municipal Water Authority

2017 Consumer Confidence Report for Public Water System EAST MONTANA WATER SYSTEM

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

2016 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT

The Water We Drink. Slidell Water Supply. Public Water Supply ID: LA

3600 Water Street Stevens Point, Wisconsin Consumer Confidence Report Data WHITING WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

2015 Consumer Confidence Report Data LAKELAND UNIVERSTIY, PWS ID:

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

2017 Consumer Confidence Report for Public Water System CITY OF SAN BENITO

2017 Consumer Confidence Report for Public Water System GREENWOOD WATER SYSTEM

2015 Consumer Confidence Report Data WHITING WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

TEST, or

CITY OF OTTAWA 2015 CCR REPORT

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Data ROME WATER UTILITY, PWS ID:

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Data ROBERTS WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

WATER QUALITY REPORT A R I Z O N A. Contaminants in Water

Lovington Municipal Water CCR 2013

Fruitvale Water Supply Corporation Consumer Confidence Report for Public Water Systems PWS

TESI BEAU PARTERRE Public Water Supply ID: LA Consumer Confidence Report 2015 CCR. The Water We Drink

City of Hondo Annual Drinking Water Quality Report PWS #TX

2018 Consumer Confidence Report Data SAUKVILLE WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

2014 Consumer Confidence Report Data VIROQUA WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

CITY OF OTTAWA 2014 CCR REPORT

MEIER S SETTLEMENT WSC 2018 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT

2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Northampton- Milwaukee Water System Number:

Texas A&M University Commerce 2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Consumer Confidence Report (CCR)

Este reporte incluye información importante sobre el agua para tomar. Para asistencia en español, favor de llamar al telefono

Annual Consumer Confidence Report for the Sonoma State University Drinking Water System 2008

2017 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT PWS ID#: SYSTEM NAME: Dover Township

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Name ffm!?f( ea,nrja/1. Phone. Sources of Drinking Water

2016 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT PWS ID#: SYSTEM NAME: Dover Township

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Data HOLMEN WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

The Water We Drink. Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal District WS Public Water Supply ID: LA

LATROBE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Varner Creek Utility District - PWS TX For the period of January 1 December 31, 2016

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Consumer Confidence Report (CCR)

2017 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT

Este reporte incluye informatiŏn sobre el agua para tomar. Para asistencia en espaňol, favor de llamar al telefono (254)

2015 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report 2016 Ripley Water Works 108 South Street Ripley, WV PWSID# January 30, 2017

Consumer Confidence Report

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

2016 Consumer Confidence Report Data FALL RIVER WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

The Water We Drink. MINDEN WATER SYSTEM Public Water Supply ID: LA

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

Annual Consumer Confidence Report for the Sonoma State University Drinking Water System 2014

Radford Army Ammunition Plant PWSID # Consumer Confidence Report (Water Quality Report)

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT

LATROBE MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY

CONSUMER CONFIDENDCE REPORT 2017 P.W.S.#OHIO

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

Results. # Sites Over AL. Units

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Data FALL RIVER WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

2016 Drinking Water Report

PWS ID Number TX

2017 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report Consumer Confidence Report Public Water System TX GREEN VALLEY SUD

Our Drinking Water is SAFE! Sand Creek 2017 Consumer Confidence Report

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

2016 ZELIENOPLE BOROUGH ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT

2016 CONSUMER CONFIDENCE REPORT CITY OF GALENA PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY

City of Shavano Park Consumer Confidence Report Annual Drinking Water Quality Report

HMW SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT 2017 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT Kipling Oaks II and Timbergreen PWS ID

Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Sources of Drinking Water

customer confidence report

2018 Consumer Confidence Report Data PRESCOTT WATERWORKS, PWS ID:

2017 Consumer Confidence Report Kingsland Water Supply Corporation Public Water System Number

Introduction and Water Resources Source Water Assessment Additional Health Information Microbial contaminants Inorganic contaminants

2013 ANNUAL DRINKING WATER QUALITY REPORT PWS ID#: SYSTEM NAME: Dover Township

The Water We Drink. Consumer Confidence Report. Our Continuing Commitment. Why You Should Read This

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Desoto County Utilities, PWS #

IMPORTANT INFORMATION

GEORGETOWN TOWN OF 2015 Drinking Water Quality Report For Calendar Year 2014

2016 Annual Drinking Water Quality Report. Consumer Confidence Report (CCR)

2017 Drinking Water Report

Transcription:

Cawood Water District Water Quality Report 2015 Water System ID: KY0480565 Manager: Pete Dean CCR Contact: Chris McClain Phone: 606-573-3744 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 429, Cawood, KY 40815 Meeting Location and Time: Second Tuesday each month at 6:30 PM Source Information: The source of water for the Cawood Water Treatment Plant is surface water from the Martins Fork River. A Source Water Assessment Plan has been developed to determine the susceptibility of the Cawoood water supply. This analysis indicates that the susceptibility to contamination is generally moderate. The potential sources of contamination include transportation corridors, mine sites, dump sites, waste storage sites, septic systems, and straight pipes. Activities and land uses upstream of the intake can pose potential risks to your drinking water and increase the cost of treatment. The complete Source Water Assessment Plan is available for review at the Cawood Water District Office. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects may be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800-426-4791). The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and may pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. Contaminants that may be present in source water include: Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, (sewage plants, septic systems, livestock operations, or wildlife). Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, (naturally occurring or from stormwater runoff, wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming). Pesticides and herbicides, (stormwater runoff, agriculture or residential uses). Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, (by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production, or from gas stations, stormwater runoff, or septic systems). Radioactive contaminants, (naturally occurring or from oil and gas production or mining activities). In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. FDA regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water to provide the same protection for public health. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA/CDC guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800-426-4791). Information About Lead: If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. Your local public water system is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead. Some or all of these definitions may be found in this report: Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology. Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) - the level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) - the highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG) - the level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. Below Detection Levels (BDL) - laboratory analysis indicates that the contaminant is not present. Not Applicable (N/A) - does not apply. Parts per million (ppm) - or milligrams per liter, (mg/l). One part per million corresponds to one minute in two years or a single penny in $10,000. Parts per billion (ppb) - or micrograms per liter, (µg/l). One part per billion corresponds to one minute in 2,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000. Parts per trillion (ppt) - one part per trillion corresponds to one minute in 2,000,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000,000. Parts per quadrillion (ppq) - one part per quadrillion corresponds to one minute in 2,000,000,000 years or one penny in $10,000,000,000,000. Picocuries per liter (pci/l) - a measure of the radioactivity in water. Millirems per year (mrem/yr) - measure of radiation absorbed by the body. Million Fibers per Liter (MFL) - a measure of the presence of asbestos fibers that are longer than 10 micrometers. Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) - a measure of the clarity of water. Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can provide a medium for microbial growth. Turbidity is monitored because it is a good indicator of the effectiveness of the filtration system. Variances & Exemptions (V&E) - State or EPA permission not to meet an MCL or a treatment technique under certain conditions. Action Level (AL) - the concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system shall follow. Treatment Technique (TT) - a required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. Spanish (Español) Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre la calidad de su agua beber. Tradúzcalo o hable con alguien que lo entienda bien.

The data presented in this report are from the most recent testing done in accordance with administrative regulations in 401 KAR Chapter 8. As authorized and approved by EPA, the State has reduced monitoring requirements for certain contaminants to less often than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants are not expected to vary significantly from year to year. Some of the data in this table, though representative, may be more than one year old. Turbidity (NTU) TT No more than 1 NTU* Highest Single Lowest Violation Measurement Monthly % Likely Source * Representative samples Less than 0.3 NTU in 0.43 97 No Soil runoff of filtered w ater 95% of monthly samples Regulated Contaminant Test Results Contaminant Report Range Date of Violation Likely Source of [code] (units) MCL MCLG Level of Detection Sample Contamination Barium [1010] (ppm) 2 2 0.016 0.016 to 0.016 Feb-15 No Copper [1022] (ppm) AL = 0.0101 sites exceeding action leve 1.3 1.3 (90 th 0 to 0.0143 Aug-14 No Fluoride 0 percentile) [1025] (ppm) 4 4 1.2 1.2 to 1.2 Feb-15 No Lead [1030] (ppb) AL = 0 sites exceeding action leve 15 0 (90 th 0 to 4 Aug-14 No Nitrate 0 0.00 percentile) [1040] (ppm) 10 10 0.2 0.2 to 0.2 Feb-15 No Total Organic Carbon (ppm) 1.03 (measured as ppm, but TT* N/A (lowest 1.00 to 2.11 2015 No reported as a ratio) Allowable Levels *Monthly ratio is the % TOC removal achieved to the % TOC removal required. Annual average must be 1.00 or greater for compliance. Chlorine MRDL MRDLG 1.49 (ppm) = 4 = 4 (highest 0.64 to 2.8 2015 No HAA (ppb) (Stage 2) 34 [Haloacetic acids] 60 N/A (high site 8 to 58 2015 No (range of individual sites) TTHM (ppb) (Stage 2) 48 [total trihalomethanes] 80 N/A (high site 15 to 92 2015 No (monthly ratios) (range of individual sites) Drilling wastes; metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits Corrosion of household plumbing systems Water additive which promotes strong teeth Corrosion of household plumbing systems Fertilizer runoff; leaching from septic tanks, sewage; erosion of natural deposits Naturally present in environment. Water additive used to control microbes. disinfection disinfection. 2015-9605325 We received a violation because our 2014 Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) development was not done correctly. The table within the report did not contain data for 2014. The report included a table from the 2012 CCR. The 2014 report also did not explain the violations we had received in 2014. The CCR for 2015 includes explanations for the violations received during 2014 and 2015. We have enlisted assistance with development of these reports.

2015-9605324 indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During April 2015, we did not complete all monitoring by failing to report or correctly report testing for Monthly Operation Report. Therefore, we could not verify the quality of your drinking water to the primacy agency during that time. tenth of the following month. This report includes daily testing results, chemicals added, and total volumes treated. Our report for March 2015 should have arrived at Division of Water no later than 4/10/2015. The report arrived on 4/21/2015. There is nothing you need to do. There are no health effects for submitting reports after the due date. 2015-649 indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During 10/1/2014 12/31/2014, we did not complete all monitoring or testing for trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, and therefore cannot be sure of the quality of your drinking water during that time. We were required to collect two sets of samples during the fourth quarter of 2014. One of our sample sets was collected from an incorrect sample site and was not accepted by Division of Water. 2016-9605326 We received a violation linked to 2014-9605319 (Turbidity December 2013). We failed to submit the Monthly Operating Report (MOR) by the required deadline and provide documentation to Division of Water that a public notice was distributed for that violation. 2016-9605327 We received a violation linked to 2014-9605320 (Chlorine December 2013). We failed to submit the Monthly Operating Report (MOR) by the required deadline and provide documentation to Division of Water that a public notice was distributed for that violation. 2014-9605319 indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During 12/1/2013 12/31/2013, we did not complete all monitoring or testing for turbidity, and therefore cannot be sure of the quality of your drinking water during that time. tenth of the following month. This report includes daily testing results, chemicals added, and total volumes treated. One of the pages in the MOR is for turbidity readings. We failed to submit the MOR and received violations for the missing information. The MOR for December 2013 has been submitted to Division of Water. There is nothing you need to do. 2014-9605320 indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During 12/1/2013 12/31/2013, we did not complete all monitoring or testing for chlorine, and therefore cannot be sure of the quality of your drinking water during that time. tenth of the following month. This report includes daily testing results, chemicals added, and total volumes treated. One of the pages in the MOR is for chlorine readings. We failed to submit the MOR and received violations for the missing information. The MOR for December 2013 has been submitted to Division of Water. There is nothing you need to do. Please share this information with all the other people who drink this water, especially those who may not have received this notice directly (for example, people in apartments, nursing homes, schools, and businesses). You can do this by posting this notice in a public place or distributing copies by hand or mail.

Cawood Water District - Pathfork Water Quality Report 2015 Water System ID: KY0483727 Manager: Pete Dean CCR Contact: Chris McClain Phone: 606-573-3744 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 429, Cawood, KY 40815 Meeting Location and Time: Second Tuesday each month at 6:30 PM Source Information: Cawood Water District purchases water for the Pathfork area from Pineville. Pineville treats surface water from the Cannon Creek Lake located in Bell County. A Source Water Assessment and Protection Plan for Pineville Water System indicates that our source is moderately susceptible to contamination. The largest potential contaminant to Pineville s source water is the forested land coverings in the watershed which could be subject to logging. Logging could result in soil erosion if required Best Management Practices are not carefully applied. Erosion could contribute silts and clays and natural organics to the source waters. The completed Source Water Assessment and Protection Plan is available for viewing during normal business hours at the Pineville Water System office. Drinking water, including bottled water, may reasonably be expected to contain at least small amounts of some contaminants. The presence of contaminants does not necessarily indicate that water poses a health risk. More information about contaminants and potential health effects may be obtained by calling the Environmental Protection Agency's Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800-426-4791). The sources of drinking water (both tap water and bottled water) include rivers, lakes, streams, ponds, reservoirs, springs, and wells. As water travels over the surface of the land or through the ground, it dissolves naturally occurring minerals and, in some cases, radioactive material, and may pick up substances resulting from the presence of animals or from human activity. Contaminants that may be present in source water include: Microbial contaminants, such as viruses and bacteria, (sewage plants, septic systems, livestock operations, or wildlife). Inorganic contaminants, such as salts and metals, (naturally occurring or from stormwater runoff, wastewater discharges, oil and gas production, mining, or farming). Pesticides and herbicides, (stormwater runoff, agriculture or residential uses). Organic chemical contaminants, including synthetic and volatile organic chemicals, (by-products of industrial processes and petroleum production, or from gas stations, stormwater runoff, or septic systems). Radioactive contaminants, (naturally occurring or from oil and gas production or mining activities). In order to ensure that tap water is safe to drink, EPA prescribes regulations that limit the amount of certain contaminants in water provided by public water systems. FDA regulations establish limits for contaminants in bottled water to provide the same protection for public health. Some people may be more vulnerable to contaminants in drinking water than the general population. Immuno-compromised persons such as persons with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, persons who have undergone organ transplants, people with HIV/AIDS or other immune system disorders, some elderly, and infants can be particularly at risk from infections. These people should seek advice about drinking water from their health care providers. EPA/CDC guidelines on appropriate means to lessen the risk of infection by Cryptosporidium and other microbial contaminants are available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline (800-426-4791). Information About Lead: If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women and young children. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. Your local public water system is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety of materials used in plumbing components. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. Information on lead in drinking water, testing methods, and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the Safe Drinking Water Hotline or at http://www.epa.gov/safewater/lead. Some or all of these definitions may be found in this report: Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) - the highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the MCLGs as feasible using the best available treatment technology. Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) - the level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs allow for a margin of safety. Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) - the highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants. Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG) - the level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants. Below Detection Levels (BDL) - laboratory analysis indicates that the contaminant is not present. Not Applicable (N/A) - does not apply. Parts per million (ppm) - or milligrams per liter, (mg/l). One part per million corresponds to one minute in two years or a single penny in $10,000. Parts per billion (ppb) - or micrograms per liter, (µg/l). One part per billion corresponds to one minute in 2,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000. Parts per trillion (ppt) - one part per trillion corresponds to one minute in 2,000,000 years, or a single penny in $10,000,000,000. Parts per quadrillion (ppq) - one part per quadrillion corresponds to one minute in 2,000,000,000 years or one penny in $10,000,000,000,000. Picocuries per liter (pci/l) - a measure of the radioactivity in water. Millirems per year (mrem/yr) - measure of radiation absorbed by the body. Million Fibers per Liter (MFL) - a measure of the presence of asbestos fibers that are longer than 10 micrometers. Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) - a measure of the clarity of water. Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can provide a medium for microbial growth. Turbidity is monitored because it is a good indicator of the effectiveness of the filtration system. Variances & Exemptions (V&E) - State or EPA permission not to meet an MCL or a treatment technique under certain conditions. Action Level (AL) - the concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system shall follow. Treatment Technique (TT) - a required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water. Spanish (Español) Este informe contiene información muy importante sobre la calidad de su agua beber. Tradúzcalo o hable con alguien que lo entienda bien.

Copper, chlorine, HAA & THM by Cawood-Pathfork. All others by Pineville. The data presented in this report are from the most recent testing done in accordance with administrative regulations in 401 KAR Chapter 8. As authorized and approved by EPA, the State has reduced monitoring requirements for certain contaminants to less often than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants are not expected to vary significantly from year to year. Some of the data in this table, though representative, may be more than one year old. Turbidity (NTU) TT No more than 1 NTU* Highest Single Lowest Violation Measurement Monthly % Likely Source * Representative samples Less than 0.3 NTU in 0.078 100 No Soil runoff of filtered water 95% of monthly samples Regulated Contaminant Test Results Contaminant Report Range Date of Violation Likely Source of [code] (units) MCL MCLG Level of Detection Sample Contamination Barium [1010] (ppm) 2 2 0.007 0.007 to 0.007 2015 No Copper [1022] (ppm) AL = 0.013 sites exceeding action leve 1.3 1.3 (90 th 0.0067 to 0.0147 2015 No Fluoride 0 percentile) [1025] (ppm) 4 4 1.04 1.04 to 1.04 2015 No Thallium [1085] (ppb) 2 0.5 0.1 0.1 to 0.1 2015 No Total Organic Carbon (ppm) 1.00 (measured as ppm, but TT* N/A (lowest 1.00 to 1.00 2015 No reported as a ratio) *Monthly ratio is the % TOC removal achieved to the % TOC removal required. Annual average must be 1.00 or greater for compliance. Chlorine MRDL MRDLG 1.42 (ppm) = 4 = 4 (highest 0.61 to 2.60 2015 No HAA (ppb) (Stage 2) 56 [Haloacetic acids] 60 N/A (high site 54 to 56 2015 No TTHM (ppb) (Stage 2) 88 [total trihalomethanes] 80 N/A (high site 81 to 88 2015 No* strontium chromium-6 chlorate total chromium Allowable Levels Unregulated Contaminants (UCMR 3) average (monthly ratios) (range of individual sites) (range of individual sites) range (ppb) date 71.725 9.8 to 180 2014 0.032 BDL to 0.079 2014 130.8 40.2 to 220 2014 0.038 BDL to 0.3 2014 Drilling wastes; metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits Corrosion of household plumbing systems Water additive which promotes strong teeth Leaching from ore-processing sites; discharge from glass, electronics, and drug factories Naturally present in environment. Water additive used to control microbes. disinfection disinfection. Fluoride (added for dental health) Average Range of Detection 0.90 0.67 to 1.12 *Annual Stage 2 sample triggered quarterly sampling. No violation if only the annual sample exceeded the MCL. Pineville Water System has sampled for a series of unregulated contaminants. Unregulated contaminants are those that don t yet have a drinking water standard set by EPA. The purpose of monitoring for these contaminants is to help EPA decide whether the contaminants should have a standard. As our customers, you have a right to know that these data are available. If you are interested in examining the results, please contact their office during normal business hours.

2015-8 indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During April 2015, we did not complete all monitoring by failing to report or correctly report testing for Monthly Operation Report. Therefore, we could not verify the quality of your drinking water to the primacy agency during that time. tenth of the following month. This report includes daily testing results, chemicals added, and total volumes treated. Our report for March 2015 should have arrived at Division of Water no later than 4/10/2015. The report arrived on 4/21/2015. There is nothing you need to do. There are no health effects for submitting reports after the due date. 2016-9 We received a violation because our 2014 CCR development and distribution was not done correctly. The table within the report did not contain data from our supplier. The report indicated a detection for lead when in actuality lead was not detected in any sample. The report also did not explain the violations we had received in 2014. The certification documents for the CCR did not indicate the primary distribution method. We have enlisted assistance with development of these reports. 2016-10 We received a violation because we failed to submit documentation for violation number 2015-622 (DBPS 3 rd quarter 2014). 2015-622 indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During 7/1/2014 9/30/2014, we did not complete all monitoring or testing for trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, and therefore cannot be sure of the quality of your drinking water during that time. We were scheduled to take our first annual samples during August 2014. However, we failed to collect the samples. There is nothing you need to do at this time. You may continue to drink the water. We arranged with a contract lab to schedule and analyze the samples beginning in August 2015. 2016-703 indicator of whether or not our drinking water meets health standards. During 10/1/2015 12/31/2015, we did not complete all monitoring or testing for trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids, and therefore cannot be sure of the quality of your drinking water during that time. We collected our annual samples during August 2015. The trihalomethanes result exceeded the MCL and triggered the need for quarterly monitoring. We failed to initiate that requirement. Our contract lab has since been contacted and a schedule established to collect the sample sets each quarter. Please share this information with all the other people who drink this water, especially those who may not have received this notice directly (for example, people in apartments, nursing homes, schools, and businesses). You can do this by posting this notice in a public place or distributing copies by hand or mail.