PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE VICTOR DIAMOND MINE EXTENSION IN ONTARIO

Similar documents
PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE HOWSE PROPERTY IRON MINE IN NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE MAGINO GOLD MINE IN ONTARIO

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE BLACK POINT GRANITE QUARRY IN NOVA SCOTIA

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE SHELBURNE BASIN VENTURE EXPLORATION DRILLING PROJECT IN NOVA SCOTIA

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE EXPANSION PROJECT IN ALBERTA AND BRITISH COLUMBIA

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE BURNCO AGGREGATE MINE IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency, as represented by the President of the Canadian Northern Economic Development Agency ( CanNor )

Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, Newfoundland Environmental Industry Association November 21, 2012

Environmental Regulation & Mine Permitting in Ontario

THE proposed IMPACT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM

THE proposed IMPACT ASSESSMENT SYSTEM. A Technical Guide

ONE WINDOW COORDINATION PROCESS for Mineral Development Projects in Ontario

Canada s New Federal Environmental Assessment Process

Facilitating Implementation of the Canada-Ontario Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation

Department of Environment and Conservation. NEIA newleef 2013 October 10, 2013

Licensing Process for New Uranium Mines and Mills in Canada

Canad~ Record of Decision. In the Matter of. Canadian Nuclear Laboratories

HARDROCK PROJECT CONSULTATION PLAN for Long Lake #58 First Nation

BACKGROUND INFORMATION. for the INITIAL FEDERAL PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD. on the

Federal Requirements for Waterpower Development Environmental Assessment Processes in Ontario - PRACTITIONER S GUIDE -

Environmental Review Process. Presented by Environment and Natural Resource Unit, Lands and Economic Development, BC Region

Shell Quest Carbon Capture and Storage Project. Shell Canada Limited

Nuclear Regulation in Canada

Canada. Record of Proceedings, Including Reasons for Decision. Cameco Corp_o_ra_ti_o_n. Proponent

February 15, Mr. Kyle Stanfield Prodigy Gold Incorporated Box 209, 3 Dree Road Dubreuilville, ON P05 1BO

CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION

Appendix A to the Administrative Protocol for the Near Surface Disposal Facility Project at Chalk River Laboratories

Comprehensive Study Scoping Document. for Lower Mattagami Hydroelectric Complex Redevelopment CEAR Reference Number:

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTRE. April 19, 1999

TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF FIGURES TABLE OF TABLES 2. REGULATORY PROCESS Impact Assessment Process Permits and Licences...2.

Comprehensive Study Report for the Proposed Midwest Mining and Milling Project in Northern Saskatchewan, AREVA Resources Canada Incorporated

Review of the Class Environmental Assessment for Waterpower Projects Ontario Waterpower Association

to Nemaska Lithium Inc. c/o Guy Bourassa President and Chief Operating Officer 450 De la Gare-du-Palais Street, 1 st Floor Quebec, Quebec G1K 3X2

available in multiple formats Environmental Self-Assessment Handbook for Rail Infrastructure Projects

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Between: The Department of National Defence. and. The Department of the Environment and Parks Canada Agency.

Magino Project Environmental Impact Statement. Technical Support Document Draft Fish Habitat Compensation Plan

Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation. Presentation to CANDO-Manitoba Learning Match 2014

Note: This is a draft document and does not represent a position or decision by government. Part 2: Policy for Cumulative Effects Management

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. Between HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF NATURAL RESOURCES.

Changes to Federal Environmental Assessment and Regulatory Legislation

Licensing and Environmental Assessments of New NPP s

Date: December 13, From: W. Turner. To: Lucia Abellan, Environmental Assessment Officer Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission

clarify the roles of the Department and minerals industry in consultation; and

Manitoba Hydro s governance & planning processes

Santoy 8 Satellite Mine at the Seabee Gold Mine. Technical Review Comments. on the. Environmental Impact Statement.

TRCA ENGAGEMENT GUIDELINES (June 2015)

READING GUIDE. Purpose of the Document

Protocol Agreement. Ministry of Sustainable Resource Management and the Oil and Gas Commission

Detour Lake Gold Mine Project Follow-up Program

CEF. Cumulative Effects Framework. Interim Policy. for the Natural Resource Sector. October Cumulative Effects Framework

Bill Building Better Communities and Conserving Watersheds Act, 2017

Expert Panel Review of Federal EA Processes British Columbia s Submission

The Past, Present, and Future of Environmental Assessment in Canada. Professor Martin Olszynski University of Calgary Faculty of Law 23 February 2016

NWMO BACKGROUND PAPERS 7. INSTITUTIONS AND GOVERNANCE

Record of Proceedings, Including Reasons for Decision

A Study of Public Participation under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012

4.0 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, SCOPING, AND CONSULTATION AND ENGAGEMENT

Multi-Year Area-Based Permitting Policy for Mineral and Coal Exploration Activities

Audit of Public Participation and Consultation Activities. The Audit and Evaluation Branch

Subject Waterpower New Site Release and Development Review

SUMMARY OF COMMENTS/RECOMMENDATIONS. Town of Grand Rapids Water Treatment Plant Upgrade

March Protected area boundary adjustments fall within one of three categories:

REVIEW OF ALTERNATIVES IN DARLINGTON NEW BUILD ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TRACK REPORT GALORE CREEK COPPER-GOLD-SILVER MINE PROJECT. Northwestern British Columbia

Frequently Asked Questions About OPG s Deep Geologic Repository for Low and Intermediate-level Nuclear Waste

Regional Land Use Planning. Guidelines on what to expect from the Government of the Northwest Territories 2016

The GNWT recommends Canada reject this recommendation in favour of commitments made by the GNWT during the environmental impact review process.

CANADA-NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR BENEFITS PLAN GUIDELINES (DRAFT)

PROJECTS ON FEDERAL LANDS. Making a determination under section 67 of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012

Reconciling the duty to consult with other law

Regulatory Oversight of Major Decommissioning Projects under the Canadian GoCo Model

CONSERVATION ONTARIO, MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES & MINISTRY OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS AND HOUSING

PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT MINISTERIAL CHANGE APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SECTION 16(2)(a) THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ACT

Guide to Involving Proponents When Consulting First Nations

Appendix B. Commitments made in the Approved Terms of Reference

Summary of Proposed Changes to the Technical Guide to Renewable Energy Approvals

Reasons for Ministers Decision

January 17, 2017 EASB File #: Transaction #: Re: SaskWater Buffalo Pound Non-Potable Water Supply System Pipeline

SPEAKING NOTES FOR SHEILAGH MURPHY NATIONAL INDIGENOUS FORESTRY SECTOR MEETING Hilton Lac Lemy, Gatineau, Québec March 8, 2018

Addressing Purpose of and Alternative Means under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012

Ontario s Submission to the National Energy Board Modernization Expert Panel

APPENDIX D EA Conditions Review D-1: Federal EA Conditions Review D-2: Provincial EA Conditions Review

PROPOSED PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT APRIL Performance Agreement Concerning Air Pollutants from the Iron Ore Pellet Sector (Herein Agreement ) Between

The Canadian EIA Process: The Purpose, The Process, The Players and The Pitfalls Part I The Purpose and Process

GENERAL SPECIFICATION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION FOR CONSTRUCTION IN AND AROUND WATERBODIES AND ON WATERBODY BANKS

UPPER NASS LAXYIP STRATEGIC ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT (the Agreement ) This Agreement is dated for reference September 12, 2018 ( Effective Date )

TRANSPORTATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES Rapid Transit Initiative

December 21, Specific Comments by Page. Note: Comments below are not intended to be comprehensive

Radiocommunication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems

3.1 Conservation Authorities Act

Environmental Impact Screening Guidelines

Discussion Document 7 (revised) Early planning, necessary committees and ongoing participation Lead Author: A. John Sinclair

PROJECT BRIEF for the John Hart Generating Station Replacement Project

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REVITALIZATION DISCUSSION PAPER

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

Canada: Energy and Natural Resources Law Overview

Generic Guidelines for the Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement. pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012

Table of Contents. Species at Risk Act Habitat Management

Alberta Energy Regulator Mandate and Roles Document

pncima initiative planning process overview draft backgrounder March 2010

Transcription:

PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR THE VICTOR DIAMOND MINE EXTENSION IN ONTARIO PREAMBLE The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency (CEA Agency) has commenced an environmental assessment (EA) pursuant to the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 202 (CEAA 202) for De Beers Canada Incorporated s (the Proponent) Victor Diamond Mine Extension (the Project). De Beers Canada Incorporated proposes the construction, operation and decommissioning of a second pit and additional ancillary components, approximately 6.5 kilometres northwest of the existing Victor Diamond Mine, located approximately 00 kilometres west of the Attawapiskat First Nation, in Ontario. The second pit is expected to have an ore production capacity of just over 9,000 tonnes per day with a mine life of roughly seven years. The CEA Agency and the Ontario Ministry of Environment and Climate Change have agreed to coordinate the federal and provincial EAs to the extent possible pursuant to the Canada-Ontario Agreement on Environmental Assessment Cooperation. Nothing in this Project Agreement (the Agreement) fetters the powers, statutory authorities and functions of federal departments/agencies and their respective Ministers. The signatories to this Agreement (the Parties) commit to work together to facilitate an effective, accountable, transparent, timely and predictable federal review in relation to the proposed project and to contribute to fulfilling the Crown s duty to consult Aboriginal groups..0 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide detailed information pertaining to the federal review process where the CEA Agency is the responsible authority during the EA. For further information regarding the federal review process, please refer to The Federal Review Process for Major Projects: Project Agreement Companion Document (the Companion Document) (www.mpmo-bggp.gc.ca). 2.0 ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES The following federal departments and agencies have identified an interest in the Project, and will participate in the federal review: Responsible authority: The CEA Agency will ensure that an EA is conducted, an EA Report is prepared and that an EA Decision Statement is issued; Federal authorities (FAs): Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Natural Resources Canada (NRCan), Environment Canada (EC), Health Canada (HC) and Transport Canada (TC) may be in possession of specialist or expert information or knowledge with respect to the Project; Regulatory departments: DFO has, and TC and NRCan may have regulatory and statutory duties in relation to the Project; Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada has advisory responsibilities in relation to the Project to support consistency with the Government of Canada s Whole of Government approach to Aboriginal consultation activities; and, - -

The Major Projects Management Office will provide oversight and advice throughout the entire federal review in relation to the Project to ensure adherence to the service standards and roles and responsibilities of all Parties as described in the Agreement and the Companion Document. 3.0 Aboriginal Consultation The Parties are committed to a Whole of Government approach to Aboriginal consultation that is integrated with the EA and regulatory process, to the extent possible. For more information on the Whole of Government approach, including roles and responsibilities of departments and agencies, as well as coordination during the project review, please refer to Annex I of the Companion Document. Where applicable, the terms and conditions of all existing agreements or protocols and/or MOUs between the Crown and Aboriginal groups will be respected. 4.0 TIMELINES Timelines identified in the Agreement represent the time expected to be taken by federal departments and agencies in carrying out their respective tasks. The timelines do not account for time taken by the Proponent to collect information or undertake a study at the request of the CEA Agency during the EA or regulatory departments during the regulatory phase. The target timelines for the federal review are as follows: a) Completion of the EA, as per CEAA 202 365 days from the posting of the Notice of Commencement (NoC) on the Canadian Environmental Assessment Registry Internet Site (CEARIS) to the Minister of the Environment's (the Minister) EA Decision Statement about whether the project is likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects. b) Regulatory decisions pursuant to the Fisheries Act, and the Navigation Protection Act (NPA) 90 days from receipt of a complete application assuming the Minister s EA Decision Statement has been posted on the CEARIS and no additional consultation is required. c) Regulatory decision pursuant to the Explosives Act month from the submission of a complete and acceptable application for an Explosives Factory Licence assuming the Minister s EA Decision Statement has been posted on the CEARIS. d) If appropriate, issue an Order in Council (OIC) exemption under s.24 of the NPA.5 months from the EA course of action decisions posted on the CEARIS - 2 -

5.0 SIGNATORIES The Parties hereto have signed the Agreement, in counterpart, on the dates indicated below. Bob Hamilton Natural Resources Canada 205-0-6 Ron Hallman President Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 205-0-2 Matthew King Fisheries and Oceans Canada 205-0-20 Yazmine Laroche Associate Infrastructure Canada (on behalf of Louis Lévesque, Transport Canada) 205-0-2 Michael Martin Environment Canada 205-02-05 Colleen Swords Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada 205-0-2-3 -

Annex I Key Milestones and Service Standards for the Environmental Assessment and Aboriginal Consultation Milestone Lead Support As Needed Timeline/ Completion Post the Notice of Commencement (NoC) CEA Agency FAs June 4 th, 203 on the CEARIS 2 Public and Aboriginal group comment period on the draft EIS Guidelines CEA Agency FAs June 4, 203 to July 4, 203 3 Finalize the EIS Guidelines and provide CEA Agency FAs August 2, 203 to the Proponent 4 Submit the EIS and EIS Summary Proponent CEA Agency, FAs To be determined by the Proponent 5 Perform conformity check of the EIS CEA Agency Day 60-66 (7 6 Public and Aboriginal group comment period on the EIS summary CEA Agency FAs Starting between day 67 and 90 (for a duration of 30 7 Federal authorities review and provide FAs CEA Agency Day 67-06 (40 comments on the EIS to the CEA Agency 8 CEA Agency reviews and provides information requests on the EIS to the Proponent CEA Agency FAs Day 67-7 (5 days) 9 Submit response to information requests Proponent CEA Agency, FAs Federal authorities review and provide 0 comments on the additional information 2 3 4 5 6 7 to the CEA Agency CEA Agency reviews and provides information requests on the additional information to the Proponent 2 Prepare the draft Environmental Assessment Report (EAR) Public and Aboriginal group comment period on the draft EAR Federal authorities review and provide comments on the draft EAR to the CEA Agency To be determined by the Proponent FAs CEA Agency Day 8-47 (30 CEA Agency FAs Day 8-52 (35 CEA Agency FAs Day 53-225 (73 CEA Agency FAs Day 226-255 (30 FAs CEA Agency Day 226-260 (35 Finalize the EAR and submit to the Minister CEA Agency FAs Day 26-335 (75 Minister makes EA Decision Statement Minister CEA Agency Day 336-365 (30 Issue and post the Minister s EA CEA Agency Day 365 (0 Decision Statement on the CEARIS 3 If the EIS is not ready to proceed to the comment period, the proponent will be asked to submit a new EIS. 2 More than one round of additional information may be required. 3 In the event that the Minister of the Environment determines that a project will result in significant adverse environmental effects, the Minister must refer the matter to the Governor in Council as to whether the effects are justified in the circumstances. If this decision were to occur, the timelines identified in this step do not apply. - 4 -

Annex II Gantt Chart: Target Timelines for the EA 4 5 4 The Gantt chart is a baseline against which the timelines, identified in the Agreement expected to be taken by federal departments and agencies in carrying out their respective tasks for the EA, will be tracked. The timelines do not account for time taken by participants who are not signatories to this Agreement, such as the Proponent, provinces, Aboriginal groups, the public or other stakeholders. - 5 -

Gantt Chart: Target Timelines for the Regulatory Phase 5 5 The Gantt chart is a baseline against which the timelines, identified in the Agreement expected to be taken by federal departments and agencies in carrying out their respective tasks for the Regulatory Phase, will be tracked. The timelines do not account for time taken by participants who are not signatories to this Agreement, such as the Proponent, provinces, Aboriginal groups, the public or other stakeholders. - 6 -

Gantt Chart: Target Timelines for the Regulatory Phase (Continue) 6 6 The Gantt chart is a baseline against which the timelines, identified in the Agreement expected to be taken by federal departments and agencies in carrying out their respective tasks for the Regulatory Phase, will be tracked. The timelines do not account for time taken by participants who are not signatories to this Agreement, such as the Proponent, provinces, Aboriginal groups, the public or other stakeholders. - 7 -