Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

Similar documents
1. What variable costs are associated with corn and grain sorghum production?

International Benchmarks for Wheat Production

Self-Propelled Spraying: Machinery Ownership versus Custom Hire Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

Economics 330 Fall 2005 Exam 1. Strategic Planning and Budgeting

Costs to Produce Corn and Soybeans in Illinois 2017

BUILDING ENTERPRISE BUDGETS FOR INDIANA SPECIALTY CROP GROWERS


Grain Profitability Projections

A. Circle the best answer. Put a square around your second choice, if you want. If your second choice is correct you get half credit.

Crop Enterprise Budgets

The data for this report were collected by Iowa Farm Business Association consultants and compiled by Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.

MEASURING SCOPE EFFICIENCY FOR CROP AND BEEF FARMS. M. R. Langemeier 1 and R. D. Jones 1

Differences Between High-, Medium-, and Low-Profi t Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Crop Enterprises

Differences Between High, Medium, and Low Profit Producers: An Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Crop Enterprises

Ag Business Climate Outlook for 2017

2006 Iowa Farm Costs. and Returns File C1-10. Ag Decision Maker. Definition of Terms Used

USING PRODUCTION COSTS AND BREAKEVEN LEVELS TO DETERMINE INCOME POSSIBILITIES

Crop Farm Sort

Ag Business Climate Outlook for 2018

Flue Cured Tobacco Production Costs:

Appendix I Whole Farm Analysis Procedures and Measures

1998 Double Crop Soybean Costs and Returns

Full Season Soybeans Enterprise 1998 Costs and Returns

Wheat Enterprises: 1999 Costs and Returns

2018 Illinois Society of Professional Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers Mid-Year Survey

Organic and Conventional Crop Budgets. Michael Langemeier Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University

State Farm Business Management Program Database. Crop Farm Sort

USING ENTERPRISE BUDGETS TO IMPROVE CUSTOMER S PROFITS. Kevin Shelley 1 and Matt Hanson 2

Kentucky Farm Business Management Program. Annual Summary Data

Profitability analysis of the experimental data By Marvin Batte

2009 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2010

INTRODUCTION TO MARKETING AND COST OF PRODUCTION

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2003

2017 Crop Outlook. Chris Hurt, Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics. Michael Langemeier, Assoc. Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

Chuck Danehower Extension Specialist Farm Management Danny Morris Extension Specialist Farm Management

Examining Trends in Liquidity for a Sample of Kansas Farms

Costs to Produce Milk in Illinois 2016

Economic Research Service The USDA Commodity Costs and Returns (CAR) Estimation Project

2004 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper September 2005

Ag Outlook Webinar. Chris Hurt, Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics

1998 Missouri Crop Costs and 2000 Crop Cost of Production Estimates

Estimating and Analyzing Liquidity

2014 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

2015 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

2007 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper December, 2008

Methods and Procedures of Estimating Rent for Crop Share, and Flexable Cash Leases.

2017 Ohio Farm Business Summary

Annual Summary Data Kentucky Beef Farms

2007 Michigan Dairy Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

Agriculture & Business Management Notes...

Dryland Wheat Production and Marketing Costs in Oregon's Columbia Plateau

2011 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper October, 2012

Fall Crop Outlook Webinar

The Impact of Revenues and Costs on the Relative Returns of Illinois Grain Farms

2014 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2015

2015 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher A. Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2016

2008 Michigan Cash Grain Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Stephen Harsh. Staff Paper November, 2009

Grain versus Grazing: The Decision Process. Stan Bevers Professor & Extension Economist Vernon, Texas

Annual Summary Data Kentucky Beef Farms 2013

INDUSTRIAL HEMP SEED PRODUCTION COSTS AND RETURNS IN ALBERTA, 2015

Cotton, Corn and Soybean Net Return Comparison Decision Aid A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Growers

MILK PRODUCTION COSTS in 2000 on Selected WISCONSIN DAIRY FARMS

Farmer-to-Consumer Marketing: The Series

Kentucky Farm Business Management Program. Annual Summary Data: Purchase Area Farms 2011

Crop Economics Outlook Gary Schnitkey University of Illinois

2007 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper December, 2008

User Manual - Custom Finish Cattle Profit Projection

North Idaho Forage School: Economics of Hay Production

2012 STATE FFA FARM BUSINESS MANAGEMENT TEST PART 2. Financial Statements (FINPACK Balance Sheets found in the resource information)

Producing Goods & Services

December 12, USDA World Supply and Demand Estimates

2008 Illinois Farm Economics Summit The Profitability of Illinois Agriculture: Looking Ahead in Extraordinary Times

Measuring Farm Financial Performance

Ohio State University Extension Agriculture & Natural Resources

Costs and Returns for Cotton, Rice, and Soybeans in the Delta Area of Mississippi, 1994

LIFE SCIENCE. Onion Cost and Return Estimates, 2004 BRINGING TO YOUR HOME ECONOMICS COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND

Operating Profit Margin Benchmarks

Cash Flow and Enterprise Information - step two for your 2016 farm analysis

AgriProfit$ Economics and Competitiveness. The Economics of Sugar Beet Production in Alberta 2008

2006 Michigan Dairy Grazing Farm Business Analysis Summary. Eric Wittenberg And Christopher Wolf. Staff Paper November, 2007

AgriProfit$ Economics and Competitiveness. The Economics of Sugar Beet Production in Alberta 2007

January 12, USDA World Supply and Demand Estimates

Revenue Components. Yield Government Programs Crop Insurance

Contracting Corn Silage Acres

Evaluating the Custom Harvesting Decision: Pros and Cons

GREAT LAKES REGION 1979

Can You Afford That New Equipment?

Cost Efficiency Estimates for a Sample of Crop and Beef Farms

D a Oregoa 's. Costs. 8Z.j983. Oregon State ersity Exte5j Service. EM 823k

2018 Crop Outlook. Chris Hurt, Professor, Department of Agricultural Economics. Michael Langemeier, Assoc. Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture

September 12, USDA World Supply and Demand Estimates

NEBRASKA FFA FARM MANAGEMENT CAREER DEVELOPMENT CONTEST 2016 Farm Business Management Practice Contest Examination

Impacts of Farm Size and Tenure on the Profitability of No-Till Rice Production in Arkansas

June 12, USDA World Supply and Demand Estimates

Profitability Outlook. Ag Credit Conference October 29, 2014 Roy Black & Dennis Stein Michigan State University

January 12, USDA World Supply and Demand Estimates

Producing Goods & Services

Cash Rental Rates for Iowa 2016 Survey

Perceived versus Actual Competitive Advantage. Michael R. Langemeier Department of Agricultural Economics Purdue University

rnicrn A(iRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION AND COOPERATIVE EXTENSlON SERVICE Report of Progress 811

Transcription:

June 2017 Using Enterprise Budgets to Compute Crop Breakeven Prices Michael Langemeier, Associate Director, Center for Commercial Agriculture Enterprise budgets provide an estimate of potential revenue, expenses, and earnings or losses for a specific enterprise. Enterprise budgets are often one of the building blocks to creating a whole-farm plan. They are also extremely useful in computing breakeven prices. This article uses a cash crop farm in Indiana to illustrate the components of an enterprise budget and to compute breakeven prices for corn and soybeans. The format of the enterprise budget presented below closely follows that of the Purdue Crop Cost and Return Guide (here). Most enterprise budgets use economic costs rather than cash costs. This means that, in addition to cash costs and depreciation, opportunity costs are included. An opportunity cost represents the income that could have been earned if an input was sold or rented to someone else. Opportunity costs for unpaid family and operator labor, owned machinery, and owned land need to be included in an enterprise budget. Because opportunity costs are included in an enterprise budget, the bottom line figure (i.e., earnings or losses) represents an economic profit or loss. Over a long period of time, due to the fact that all inputs (cash items, depreciation, and opportunity costs) are being paid the market rate, economic profit is zero. If economic profit is positive, input prices will be bid up, similar to what happened to cash rents during the last decade, and economic profit will migrate towards zero. Conversely, if economic profit is negative, input prices will decline, and economic profit will head towards zero or breakeven. Rotation Corn Budget Table 1 presents an enterprise budget for rotation corn on average productivity soil in Indiana for 2017. Trend yield multiplied by the expected harvest price results in a market revenue of $629 per acre. Costs are presented on a per-acre and a per-bushel basis. Both of these figures can be useful when examining a particular cost item. -acre costs are typically easier to benchmark (with other farms or using historical information for the same farm) while per-bushel costs are extremely useful in examining the impact on a particular cost item when making a change that impacts yield per acre. Total variable cost is $422 per acre ($2.48 per bushel). Subtracting total variable cost from market revenue and adding government payments yields an expected total contribution margin of $207 per acre. For the enterprise to breakeven, the total contribution margin needs to be at least as large as total overhead cost. For 2017, the total contribution margin for rotation corn is expected to be substantially smaller than total overhead costs, resulting in a loss per acre of $129. Breakeven price is computed by adding total 2017 Purdue University Center for Commercial Agriculture 1

variable cost to total overhead cost, subtracting government payments, and dividing the result by expected yield per acre. Breakeven price for corn is estimated to be $4.46 per bushel. The breakeven price reported in table 1 is sensitive to changes in yields, prices, and cost estimates. For example, a reduction in land cost of 10% results in a breakeven price of $4.34 or a 2.6% reduction in breakeven price. Breakeven prices also vary by land productivity category. For low and high productivity land, the breakeven prices for corn are estimated to be $4.94 and $4.05 per bushel, respectively. Rotation Soybean Budget Table 2 presents an enterprise budget for rotation soybeans on average productivity soil for 2017. Trend yield multiplied by the expected harvest price results in a market revenue of $458 per acre. Variable cost is $232 per acre or $4.46 per bushel. After subtracting total variable cost from market revenue and adding government payments, total contribution margin per acre is $226. Though slightly larger than the expected contribution margin for corn, the contribution margin for soybeans is still not large enough to fully cover overhead costs. Expected loss per acre is $110. Breakeven price for soybeans is estimated to be $10.92 per bushel. The breakeven price for soybeans reported in table 2 is sensitive to changes in yields, prices, and cost estimates. For soybeans, a 10% reduction in cash rent results in a 3.4% decrease in breakeven price (a drop from $10.92 to $10.55). Notice that the percentage drop in the breakeven price for soybeans resulting from a 10% decline in cash rent is higher than the corresponding decline in the breakeven price for corn. This is due to the fact that overhead costs on a per-bushel basis are relatively more important for soybeans than corn. Total overhead cost as a percentage of total cost for soybeans is 59%. In contrast, for corn this percentage is 44%. Breakeven prices for soybeans vary by land productivity category. Breakeven soybean prices for low and high productivity land are estimated to be $12.19 and $10.10 per bushel, respectively. Final Comments It is important to note that opportunity costs for unpaid family and operator labor, owned machinery, and owned land are included in tables 1 and 2. If we want to compare revenue, costs, and earnings between farms; it is important to include these opportunity costs. Also, if we want to gauge the return to operator time and owned assets, these opportunity costs need to be included in enterprise budgets. The negative earnings or losses per acre depicted in tables 1 and 2 suggest that owned assets are not receiving market rates of return. 2017 Purdue University Center for Commercial Agriculture 2

As a final note, enterprise budgets can be used to make cropping decisions for the upcoming year. Though both corn and soybeans show losses in tables 1 and 2, the loss per acre for soybeans is less than the loss per acre for corn. The contribution margin for both crops is positive. In the short-run, a farm should continue to produce if it is covering variables costs (i.e., the total contribution margin is positive). In the long-run, all costs (variable and overhead costs) need to be covered. The higher contribution margin for soybeans does not imply that the farm should produce all soybeans. However, it does imply that the farm should consider producing both corn and soybeans. This article used a cash crop farm in Indiana to illustrate the components of an enterprise budget and to compute breakeven prices for corn and soybeans. Components of the enterprise budgets for corn and soybeans included gross revenue, variable costs, contribution margin, overhead costs, and earnings or losses. Costs should be presented on a per-acre and a per-bushel basis. Using the information in this article, breakeven prices for corn and soybeans for 2017 were projected to be $4.46 and $10.92, respectively. 2017 Purdue University Center for Commercial Agriculture 3

Table 1. Enterprise Budget for Rotation Corn on Average Productivity Soil, 2017. Acre Bushel Expected Yield per Acre 170.0 Harvest Price 3.70 Market Revenue $629 Less Variable Costs Fertilizer $115 0.68 Seed 119 0.70 Pesticides 54 0.32 Dryer Fuel 30 0.18 Machinery Fuel 15 0.09 Machinery Repairs 22 0.13 Hauling 17 0.10 Interest 12 0.07 Insurance and Miscellaneous 38 0.22 Total Variable Cost $422 $2.48 Crop Contribution Margin 207 Government Payment 0 Total Contribution Margin $207 Less Overhead Costs Machinery Ownership 100 0.59 Family and Hired Labor 42 0.25 Land 194 1.14 Total Overhead Cost $336 $1.98 Earnings or (Losses) ($129) Breakeven Price $4.46 2017 Purdue University Center for Commercial Agriculture 4

Table 2. Enterprise Budget for Rotation Soybeans on Average Productivity Soil, 2017. Acre Bushel Expected Yield per Acre 52.0 Harvest Price 8.80 Market Revenue $458 Less Variable Costs Fertilizer $42 0.81 Seed 71 1.37 Pesticides 46 0.88 Dryer Fuel 0 0.00 Machinery Fuel 9 0.17 Machinery Repairs 18 0.35 Hauling 5 0.10 Interest 7 0.13 Insurance and Miscellaneous 34 0.65 Total Variable Cost $232 $4.46 Crop Contribution Margin 226 Government Payment 0 Total Contribution Margin $226 Less Overhead Costs Machinery Ownership 100 1.92 Family and Hired Labor 42 0.81 Land 194 3.73 Total Overhead Cost $336 $6.46 Earnings or (Losses) ($110) Breakeven Price $10.92 2017 Purdue University Center for Commercial Agriculture 5