MnROAD PPA Workshop January 24 th 2013

Similar documents
Polyphosphoric Acid Modified Asphalt in Conjunction with Lime as an Antistripping Agent

North Central Asphalt User Producer Group January 24, 2013 St. Louis, MO

Asphalt Modifiers: Warm Mix, Polyphosphoric Acid, and Polymers

Update on Research into the Phosphoric Acid Modification of Asphalt. John D Angelo Office of Pavement Technology

MnDOT Implementation of the Multi-Stress Creep Asphalt Binder Specification

Binder and Mixture ETG Update

Experience with RAP and RAS at the MnROAD Research Facility. Tim Clyne NCAUPG Technical Conference January 23, 2013

Polyphosphoric Acid in Combination with Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene Block Copolymer: Laboratory Mixture Evaluation

AI turns 90 in SEAUPG CONFERENCE-BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA. Asphalt Mixture & Binder Expert Task Groups Update. New AI Products.

Asphalt Mixture & Binder Expert Task Groups Update. John Bukowski, Deputy Director Office of Pavement Technology

Development and Implementation of the Superpave System in the USA And its Relationship to Pavement Design

Perpetual Pavements. North Dakota Asphalt Conference Bismarck, ND April 6, 2010

PPA and Binder Modification. John D Angelo Office of Pavement Technology

2002 SEAUPG Meeting. Southeastern Asphalt User/Producer Group (SEAUPG) SEAUPG 2002 CONFERENCE FLORIDA FLORIDA. Central Sub-Group

Verification of Gyration Levels in the Superpave

BINDER RHEOLOGY & RUTTING STUDY PHASE 2

NCHRP 9-49A Project Update: Performance of WMA Technologies: Stage II Long-term Field Performance. Binder ETG Meeting Oklahoma City, OK Sept 15, 2015

Re-Refined Engine Oil Bottoms

Road Rehabilitation Using Foamed Asphalt

Warm Mix Asphalt Evaluation Protocol. Brian D. Prowell, P.E. Graham C. Hurley

Akzo Nobel Rediset TM Warm Mix Solutions

Performance Characteristics of Liquid and Lime-Treated Asphalt Mixtures

56 th Idaho Asphalt Conference October 27 th 2016

Performance of Interstate 35 Owatonna, MN January 27, 2003

SHRP2 R21 Composite Pavement Systems Project Overview

57 th Annual NJ Asphalt Paving Conference Iselin, NJ March 25, Ronald Corun Director- Asphalt Technical Services Axeon Specialty Products

2018 MnROAD Research Efforts Spring NCAT Test Track Conference - March 2018 Ben Worel MnROAD Operations Engineer

National Performance of High Recycled Mixtures

Effect of Asphalt Binder Formulations and Sources on Binder and Mixture Performance

2016 Local Roads Workshop Perpetual Pavement MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

Performance Related Specifications (PRS) in the Northeast Hot Mix Asphalt Perspective

Why MnROAD Asphalt Mixtures Performed Well in the TxDOT Overlay Tester. Joe W. Button, P.E. Senior Research Engineer Texas Transportation Institute

Perpetual Pavements. Perpetual Pavements Local Roads Workshop MICHIGAN RIDES ON US

Material Test Framework for Warm Mix Asphalt Trials

Laboratory Evaluation of Honeywell Polymer vs SBS Polymer Modified Asphalt Mixtures

Unique chemistries to help you build and maintain better roads. Anova Asphalt Solutions

INTRODUCTION TO ASPHALT MATERIALS FOR MANAGERS AND OWNERS ASPHALT PAVEMENT ASSOCIATION OF OREGON

MnROAD Safer, Smarter, Sustainable Pavements Through Innovative Research

Design Criteria and Testing for Cold In-Place Recycling. Todd Thomas Technical Services Engineer Colas Solutions, Inc.

Evaluating the Elastic Behavior of Asphalt Binders Using the Multiple Stress Creep Recovery (MSCR) Test

Field and Laboratory Evaluation of Plant Produced Highly Modified Thin Lift Overlay Mixtures Incorporating RAP

Update FHWA Asphalt Program. John Bukowski Asphalt Team Leader Office of Pavement Technology

Warm Mix Asphalt in Minnesota Tim Clyne Mn/DOT

Evaluation of a Heavy Polymer Modified Binder through Accelerated Pavement Testing

Work Plans Related to Modeling Andrew Hanz and Hussain Bahia

How to Select the Appropriate Pavement Rehabilitation Option. David Rettner, PE American Engineering Testing, Inc.

Performance of Recycled Rubber Modified Binders in Warm Mix Asphalt Mixtures

Recycled Asphalt Shingles in Hot Mix Asphalt. Mihai Marasteanu,Adam Zofka,Jim McGraw, Dan Krivit,Roger Olson,

Thomas Bennert Rutgers University

Comparative Evaluation of Laboratory Moisture Susceptibility Tests for Asphalt Mixtures

BACKGROUND Flexible Pavements Part of a Layered/Composite System Elastic Behavior 2

Roadway Base Stabilization Current Practice

MnROAD Phase 3 Concrete Pavement Construction Update

Using Pavement Management Data to Determine Asphalt Pavement Performance Cycles

National Superpave Status Present & Future

2002 Mn/ROAD HOT-MIX ASPHALT MAINLINE TEST CELL CONDITION REPORT

Asphalt Mix Design Improvements at Toronto Pearson. September 12, 2013

Asphalt Issues Update Mixture & Binder Expert Task Groups. John Bukowski Asphalt Team Leader Office of Pavement Technology

Mix Design Issues for. In-Place Recycling Products

MnROAD. National Research And Technology Center. Providing Research Insight for a Safe, Efficient, and Cost-Effective Transportation System

Pavement Preservation and Thin Lift Asphalt NCAUPG and Illinois Bituminous Paving Conference February 3, 2015

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD. Long-term Field Performance of WMA Pavements. Wednesday, October 25, :00-2:30PM ET

Perpetual Pavements. A Success Story. Le cas du Don Valley Parkway à Toronto. JOURNÉE DU BITUME mars 2004 Hôtel Delta à Trois-Rivières

NCAT Report MOISTURE RESISTANCE OF SULFUR-MODIFIED WARM MIX. Nam Tran Adam J. Taylor. August 2011

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MIXTURES CONTAINING RAP

OFFICE OF MATERIALS & SURFACING DOT. Connecting South Dakota and the Nation. Asphalt Conference. April 6, Rick Rowen. SDDOT Bituminous Engineer

LIME IN HOT MIX ASPHALT THE TEXAS EXPERIENCE. Darren Hazlett P.E. Retired Director Texas Department of Transportation Construction Division

PERFORMANCE TESTING FOR HOT MIX ASPHALT (EXECUTIVE SUMMARY)

CASE STUDY: A PUZZLING

Appendix E NCHRP Project Experimental Plans, Results, and Analyses

NJ I-295: A Perpetual Pavement Design and Construction Project

Minnesota Road Research Project Cell 26 Installation Report: Thermoplastic Inlay on an Asphalt Pavement Surface

Engineered Construction Products Through Green Chemistry

Serving the Nation. MnROAD Site th Street NE Monticello, Minnesota Site Phone # (651)

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO EVALUATION OF THE CECABASE TM RT WARM-MIX ADDITIVE. CECA Arkema Group. Final Report September 2011

Ohio Asphalt Paving Conference

Current NCSC RAP Research

60 th Annual Asphalt Contractors Workshop March 2, Rebecca McDaniel North Central Superpave Center

Design Considerations for Perpetual Pavements. Gary L. Fitts, P.E. Sr. Field Engineer Asphalt Institute

Performance Characteristics of Two High Performance Wearing Course Mixtures

Performance Testing: Cracking Group Experiment. Randy West Director, National Center for Asphalt Technology

Performance Graded (PG) Asphalts

Thinlay Asphalt for Pavement Preservation

HPTO High Performance Thin Overlay Rocky Mountain Asphalt Conf. Denver, CO Feb. 20, 2009 Frank Fee NuStar Asphalt Refining

Maine s s Experience Utilizing Full Depth Reclamation with Foamed Asphalt. NESMEA 2004 Portsmouth, NH

INVESTIGATION OF THE DESIGN OF ASPHALT PAVING MIXTURES USING MINNESOTA TACONITE ROCK

IN SEARCH OF THE TRUE N-DESIGN

Use of Additives and Fillers in Hot- Mix Asphalt

UPTiM Unified Performance Tests using incremental Method

DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND PERFORMANCE OF NEW- GENERATION OPEN-GRADED FRICTION COURSES

Thinlays What the research says

Pennsylvania s Experience with Thin Asphalt Overlays

Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) Update

Asphalt chemically modified with polyphosphoric acid

Minnesota Road Research Project MnROAD SuperPave Tracking (S.P ) Manuscript Word Count 5, Tables and 6 Figures

SUDAS Revision Submittal Form

RECYCLED ASPHALT PAVEMENT (RAP) USED IN SUPERPAVE MIXES MADE WITH RUBBERIZED ASPHALT

It has been revised to eliminate All Other (i.e. BAM) mixtures. This special provision should be inserted into all HMA contracts.

Transportation Research Board Technical Activities Division

Putting the Puzzle Together On Our National Asphalt RD&T Activities

Transcription:

MnROAD PPA Workshop January 24 th 2013 By John A. D Angelo johndangelo@dangeloconsultingllc.com Introductions In 2007, in order to address concerns that had been raised about the performance properties of Polyphosphoric Acid (PPA) modified asphalt, the Minnesota Department of Transportation in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Phosphoric Acid industry initiated a study to evaluate field performance. Several different pavement sections were placed on the MnROAD Low Volume test track just northwest of Minneapolis. These sections included mixes modified with PPA along with PPA in combination with Styrene Butadiene Styrene (SBS) and PPA with Elvaloy. This workshop covers the performance of these sections after five years of trafficking and exposure to the environment at MnROAD. The workshop was held in St. Louis, January 2013, in conjunction the North Central Asphalt User Producer Groups annual meeting. It included presentations on the field performance of the sections and a review of the mix testing done during the initial construction of the sections. A presentation on the state of the practice in the use of PPA was also, made. This report summarizes the findings at MnROAD regarding the use and performance of PPA presented in the workshop in addition to field data from the 2009 PPA workshop. MnRoad Construction The Minnesota Road Research Project (MnROAD) was constructed by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) in 1990-1993 as a full-scale accelerated pavement testing facility with traffic, opening in 1994. It is located near Albertville, Minnesota (40 miles northwest of St. Paul-Minneapolis). MnROAD consists of two unique road segments located parallel to Interstate 94 [1]: A 3.5-mile Mainline interstate roadway carrying live traffic averaging 28,500 vehicles per day with 12.7 % trucks.

A 2.5-mile closed-loop Low Volume Road carrying a MnROAD-operated 18-wheel, 5- axle, 80,000-lb tractor-semi-trailer to simulate the conditions of rural roads. The layout of MnROAD is shown in Figure 1. The I 94 mainline is west of an alternate eastern mainline section which is used to place test sections and have I 94 diverted onto it for trafficking. The closed-loop Low Volume Road is just northeast, directly adjacent to the I 94 mainline test sections. Low Volume Road Interstate 94 Mainline Figure 1. Aerial photo to the MnROAD layout. Individual Sections The PPA test sections were constructed in 2007 on the Low Volume Road portion of the test track. Six sections were placed over two different types and thicknesses of base course. The PPA mix study was done in conjunction with a study evaluating different base materials. The PPA Elvaloy sections were placed over 8 inches of either full depth reclamation or 8 inches of crushed aggregate base. The PPA, PPA + SBS and SBS sections were placed over 12 inches of

crushed aggregate base. A graph of the materials and thicknesses of the individual sections is shown in Figure 2. The same asphalt mix design was used for all six test sections. The HMA mix designation was SPWEB340C, which indicates a 12.5 mm Superpave wearing course mix, Traffic Level 3 (1-3 Million ESALs), 4.0% design air voids, and PG 58-34 binder. No RAP was used in any mixes and 1% hydrated lime was added at the drum plant. A liquid phosphate ester antistrip (Innovalt W) was added to each binder material at 0.5%. The cells include the following binder materials: 0.75% PPA only (Cell 33) 0.3% PPA + 1.0% SBS polymer (Cell 34) 2.0% SBS polymer only (Cell 35) 0.3% PPA + 1.1% Elvaloy polymer (Cells 77-79 shared with Fly Ash Study) 77 78 79 33 34 35 4" 58-34 Elvaloy + PPA 4" 58-34 Elvaloy + PPA 4" 58-34 Elvaloy + PPA 4" 58-34 PPA 4" 58-34 SBS +PPA 4" 58-34 SBS 8" Full Depth Reclam. 8" Class 6 8" Full Depth Reclam. + Fly Ash 12" Class 6 12" Class 6 12" Class 6 Clay Clay Clay Clay Clay Clay

Figure 2. Structural sections for the PPA study cells. Field Performance During the five years of trafficking on the test sections approximately 90,000 Equivalent Single Axle Loads were applied to the roadway. Each of the sections has very little distress after five years of traffic and exposure to the environment. Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) testing shows two groupings for the test sections (see Figure 3). The PPA and PPA+SBS had a higher overall stiffness than the SSB and PPA+Elvaloy cells in October 2009. This can be attributed to the differences in the base thickness with the PPA+Elvaloy cells being placed on the thinner base layers. The SBS cell also had a lower stiffness even though it was placed on the thicker base. The FWD data from May 2011 shows a much lower stiffness which is likely due to spring thaw of the base. The overall ranking of the cells remained the same from season to season.

Figure 3. FWD back calculated modulus for the various cells in the study. The rutting on each of the sections after 5 years and 90,000 ESALs is minimal. The maximum rutting on the sections is less than 0.25 inches and difference between the max rutting and the minimum rutting is 0.1 inches or 2.5 mm. Basically the sections all have equivalent rutting results. Rutting measurements from the initial construction until May 2012 are shown in Figure 4. From the plot it can be seen that the rutting on all the cells are basically equivalent until May 2010. There appears to be some minor change in rutting rate of the cells with the PPA + Elvaloy and SBS cells showing less rutting after the spring of 2010. However, it is unlikely that rutting would increase after 2.5 years of aging. It currently is not known if the rutting is the asphalt mixtures or in the base course. There are currently only two transverse cracks in any of the cells. Both are in the PPA + Elvaloy cell. One crack is over a cable trench for the pavement sensors. The other is away from this location where it is believed the mix was overheated during production due to heavy rain just prior to paving. Figure 4. Plot of rutting for cells in the PPA study from initial traffic loading until May 2012.

Laboratory Mix Testing Field samples of mixes placed for each of the cells, in the MnROAD PPA mix study, were tested for rutting and moisture damage. In addition, the binder was recovered from the field produced mix for comparison to the PG grading [1]. The Hamburg wheel tracking test was run wet to evaluate moisture damage and the test was run dry to evaluate rutting. The Hamburg wheel tracking test is considered a much more severe test than the indirect tensile test for the evaluation of moisture damage. Figure 5 presents a plot of the wheel tracking results. All the testing was done under water at 50 C. The field mix was reheated to 135 C prior to compaction in the gyratory compactor and the samples were made to 7% air voids. The data show that none of the mixes indicated any moisture damage problems. They all had minimal rutting with a maximum of 7mm for the Elvaloy mix. This is representative of field performance in that after five years there is no indication of any moisture damage in any of the cells. 0-5 RUT DEPTH IN mm - 10-12.5-15 MN Road 58-34(SBS) @50 C Wet AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS MN Road 58-34 PPA @ 50 C Wet AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS MN Road Cell 34, 58-34 (SBS&PPA) @50 C Wet AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS Mn Road Cell 77, 58-34 Elvaloy & PPA @50 C Wet AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS Field produced mix, reheated to 135 C prior to compaction - 20 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 RUT CYCLES AT 50 C & 158 LBS (702 N) 04/02/08 08:29:34 C:\DRIVE_E\PMW 2008\MN ROAD PPA STUDY\COMPARE RUT TEST MN Road 58-34 MIXES @ 50 C Wet.spf Figure 5. Plot of the Wet Hamburg tests at 50 C on field produced mix from each cell to evaluate moisture damage.

Rutting was evaluated with the dry Hamburg. The test is run just like the wet Hamburg except the sample temperature is controlled by hot air instead of water. This eliminates the issue of stripping from the rutting analysis. The test is also run hotter than the Hamburg moisture test. In this case the test was run at 58 C to represent the high climate temperature for the MnROAD location. Figure 6 shows a plot of the wheel tracking results for the dry Hamburg. The higher temperature of the dry Hamburg test produces higher rutting in the mixes and appears to spread the data out some. Overall the rutting is still low for a low traffic volume mix design. The larger spread in the data is likely due to causes other than mix type or binder differences. The binders were all formulated to produce a PG 58-34 with very similar high temperature properties. COMPARE COMPARE DRY HAMBURG DRY RUT RESULTS TEST for FOR INNOPHOS FIELD MIX SAMPLES OF ALL OF PG 58-34 BINDERS IN PMW HAMBURG AT 58 C, 158# LOAD ALL PG 58-34 MIXES APPLIED AT MNROAD AT 58 C, 158 LB LOAD 0-5 MN Road Cell 35 58-34 (1184 SBS) @58.5 C AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS MN Road Field Mix, 58-34 PPA Only @58.8 C AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS MN Road Cell 34 58-34 (SBS&PPA) @58.6 C AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS Mn Road Cell 77 58-34 (Elvaloy&PPA) @58.7 C AVERAGE BOTH WHEELS RUT DEPTH IN mm - 10-15 - 20 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000 RUT CYCLES AT TARGET 58 C & 158 LBS (703 N) 04/02/08 08:32:54 C:\DRIVE_E\PMW 2008\MN ROAD PPA STUDY\COMPARE DRY RUT TEST MN Road ALL 58-34 @ 58 C.spf Figure 6. Plot of the wheel tracking results for the dry Hamburg mix tests for each cell at 58 C. The binders were recovered from the mix and graded according to both the PG and Multi-Stress Creep and Recovery (MSCR) Specifictions. This data is provided in Table 1. The nonrecoverable compliance of the recovered binder is significantly lower than the RTFOT aged

binders. This would indicate that the field aging during production was much greater than the lab aging. The overall ranking based on the binder stiffness changes from the RTFOT to the recovered binders. This indicates that the aging of the individual mixes during production was not the same. This verifies that the mixes may have been produced at higher than typical temperatures due to heavy rain just before placement. Figure 7 shows a plot of the recovered J nr values from the MSCR test compared to rutting in the dry Hamburg. The rutting correlates well with the MSCR data from the recovered binder. Table 1. Comparison of RTFOT MSCR data to recovered binder from field mix MSCR data. BINDER (RTFO) Jnr @ 58 C @ 3.2 kpa % RECOVERY @ 3.2 kpa BINDER (RECOVERED FIELD MIX Jnr @ 58 C @ 3.2 kpa % RECOVERY @ 3.2 kpa PG 58-34 SBS 1.27 19.3% PG 58-34 SBS + PPA 1.79 8.6% PG 58-34 SBS 0.636 25.9 PG 58-34 SBS + PPA 0.377 35.8% PG 58-34 PPA PG 58-34 ELVALOY + PPA 2.0 3% 0.95 25.6 PG 58-34 PPA 0.475 15.1% PG 58-34 ELVALOY + PPA 0.795 26.7 General Field Performance Arkansas DOT undertook a major reconstruction plan of their interstate system in 1999. Under the program 380 miles of interstate would be reconstructed over five years with 340 miles reconstructed using hot mix asphalt (HMA) [2]. The program included 7.4 million tons of mix produced with modified asphalt binder. Most of the binder included PPA. In 1999 37% of the system had a poor IRI (> 170 in/mi) and 33% had a moderate IRI (120 to 170 in/mi). As of 2006, after completion of the rehabilitation program, over 73% of the Arkansas interstate system is in

good condition with an IRI (< 95 in/mi). There have been only very minor distresses on individual projects not related to the binder. Rut Depth @ 10000 wheel passes in Hamburg Rut Tester, 58 C, 158 lbs As a function of Jnr @ 3.2 kpa for recovered binder from mix RUT TEST PERFORMED ON FIELD MIX 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 Rut_Depth_10000_wheel_passes_mm10.5 C:\Program Files\TableCurve2Dv5.01\CLIPBRD.WK1 Rank 53 Eqn 8002 Exponential(a,b,c) r 2 =0.81949004 DF Adj r 2 =0.45847011 FitStdErr=0.99446238 Fstat=2.2699302 a=12701542 b=-12701537 c=1905339.6 7 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.75 Jnr_3200Pa(new system) Recovered binder Figure 7. Plot of the dry Hamburg for field sampled mixes to MSCR data from the recovered binders. 10.5 10 9.5 9 8.5 8 7.5 7 Rut_Depth_10000_wheel_passes_mm The National Center for Asphalt Technology (NCAT) operates a test track in Opelika, Alabama. The track is used to evaluate various mixtures and pavement sections for performance. In 2000 18 SBS modified sections were placed to evaluate the performance of SBS modified asphalt binders compared to neat binders. All of the SBS modified binders also contained 0.25% PPA and the mixtures were produced with lime or liquid anti-stripping additives [3]. These sections received 10 million ESAL s during the first loading cycle with no indications of poor performance. The rutting for all test sections was less than 6mm. There was also no evidence of moisture damage. In 2003 a second cycle of the track was constructed where nine of the existing PPA/SBS sections were left in place and nine new PPA/SBS sections were constructed. Again after 10 million ESAL s (20 million for the original sections) rutting was less than 9mm on

all the sections and there was no fatigue cracking attributable to the mixtures. After six years, with over 40 inches per year of rain, no moisture damage could be identified on the track sections. Extended Aging Study This study consisted of placing mixes produced with zero to two percent PPA in a Weatherometer for 3000 hours. The mixes were made with a 12.5 mm granite and a 5% binder content. The binder was a PG 64-22 control blended with 1, 1.5 and 2 percent PPA. A blend with 2% SBS and 0.5% PPA was also produced. The Weatherometer is a device used mostly in the roofing industry to simulate aging of the shingles on a roof. It applies heat (for this study at60 C) plus UV light and moisture. The UV light and moisture are applied at various intervals during the aging process. Moisture conditioning and heat for oxidative aging are applied at the same time with this system. A picture of the slabs in the Weatherometer is shown in Figure 8. Stabs in large Weatherometer Weatherometer exposes slabs to : Heat 60ºC UV light Water Time 3000 hrs Figure 8. Picture of mix slabs in the Weatherometer showing UV lights and water nozzles used to spray the samples during aging. The data in Table 2 shows the shows the original PG grading of the various PPA blends used in the aging study. This is compared to the recovered binder PG grading after 3000 hours in the Weatherometer. The data clearly shows that the addition of over 0.5% PPA reduces aging on the binders. The PG 64-22 control with no PPA increased in high temperature grade by 10 C,

while the blends with 1% PPA or more increased by a maximum of 7.5 C. There was also a reduction in the loss of the low temperature grading. Table 2. PG grading for the binder blends used in the long term aging experiment and PG grading of the recovered binders after 3000 hours of weatherometer aging. Sample ID Description Original Binder Continuou s PG Recovered Binder Continuous Grade High- Temp Diff. ( C) Low-Temp Diff.( C) w/o PAV #1053-001-05 PG 64-22 69.5-26.2 79.7-25.1 10.2 1.1 #1053-001-15 Neat + 1% N200 72.9-24.1 78.7-24.3 5.8 0.2 #1053-001-20 Neat + 1.5% N200 75.2-24.7 81.5-24.2 6.3 0.5 #1053-001-25 Neat + 2% N200 81.0-23.5 88.5-23.0 7.5 0.5 #1057-017-05 Neat + 2% SBS + 0.1% S + 0.5% XL200 72.6-25.3 85.3-23.3 12.7 2.0 The various mixes were also tested in the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA) before aging and after aging. A set of slabs were tested in the APA for rutting then the companion slabs were aged in the Weatherometer with exposure to UV, heat and moisture. The results are shown in Figure 8. All the samples had minimal rutting, less than 4 mm. The samples aged in the Weatherometer showed no indication of moisture damage even after being exposed to heat and moisture for 3000 hours.

Time 3000h Figure 8. APA rutting results for the various mixes used in the long term aging experiment before and after aging. Conclusions In 2007 four different mixes were placed on the MinRoad test track to evaluate if there was any difference in performance of PPA modified binders and non-ppa modified binders. The sections included PG 58-34 binders produced using SBS, SBS + PPA, Elvaloy + PPA and PPA only. After five years of exposure to the weather and traffic the all cells in the PPA study at MnROAD are performing well. Various mixes placed with PPA modified asphalt binder are showing equal performance to strait SBS modified cells. Rutting is minimal on all the cells with a maximum of 0.25 inches (6mm) after five years of traffic. There are only two transverse cracks in any of the sections and one of those is over the cable trench for the pavement instrumentation. After the five years there are no signs of any moisture damage on any of the sections. The results from MnROAD correlate well with results from previous studies in Arkansas and the NCAT track. After multiple years of service there are no indications that the PPA modified

binders in Arkansas or at the NCAT track have caused any issues with cracking or moisture damage. Rutting has not been a problem. The long term aging study using the Weatherometer has indicated that with the proper formulation even binders with higher percentages of PPA will provide long term performance in a mix. References 1. Timothy R. Clyne, Eddie N. Johnson, James McGraw, and Gerald Reinke; Field Investigation of Polyphosphoric Acid Modified Binders at MnROAD, TRB E Circular E- C160 January 2012, pg. 115. 2. Gerry R. Westerman and John A. D Angelo; Modified Asphalt Cement Use in Arkansas, TRB E Circular E-C160 January 2012, pg. 108 3. Don Watson and John A. D Angelo; Binder Modification with Combination of Polyphosphoric Acid and Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene: National Center for Asphalt Technology Test Track Experience TRB E Circular E-C160 January 2012, pg. 106 4. Laurand Lewandowski, Jean Valery Martin; Effect of Accelerated Weathering on Polyphosphoric Acid Modified Binder, Euro Asphalt Euro Bitume Conference, Istanbul 2012, paper 434.