Consultation Paper. Proposed Removal of Ashchurch Rail Freight Facility Scheme from Gloucestershire s Local Transport Plan

Similar documents
Executive Summary. Introduction

SWDP 4: Moving Around South Worcestershire. SWDP 4: Moving Around South Worcestershire. Managing Travel Demand

SOUTH CAMBRIDGESHIRE DISTRICT COUNCIL. Joint Planning Directors / Principal Planning Manager, South Cambridgeshire District Council

Statement on behalf of Barratt Homes and North Tewkesbury Land Consortium for SWDP Stage 1 hearing

Rail Freight Terminal

Housing Delivery Changing Times or Business as Usual? A West of England Perspective

Q. Where are all the people to fill these jobs going to come from (local unemployment in the villages is very low)?

Transport Select Committee Inquiry into the National Policy Statement (NPS) for National Networks Written Evidence from GB Railfreight

Consultation response. February 2014

MHCLG consultation on National Planning Policy Framework March 2018

Department for Transport Consultation on the National Policy Statement for National Networks (NN NPS) Written Evidence from GB Railfreight

A Rail Freight Interchange for Spalding

WIDER PAN-REGIONAL RESPONSE TO THE CREWE HUB CONSULTATION

Cabinet Meeting 27 June 2017

ORR consultation on on-rail competition: Options for change in open access Network Rail s response

WYG WELLINGTON BUSINESS BREAKFAST SEPTEMBER 2016

Park and Ride Action Plan Summary. A Catalyst for Change The Regional Transport Strategy for the west of Scotland

PROPOSED SUBMISSION CONSULTATION SOUTH WORCESTERSHIRE DEVELOPMENT PLAN. On behalf of Land Fund Limited. Our ref: 3471.

Arun District Council. Interim Planning Policy Guidance on Draft for consultation

Pre- submission Core Strategy and associated documents consultation. Submitted on behalf of Extra Motorway Services Area Group

DISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES. Article 1. Subject matter

1. Evaluation of route and service alternatives; 2. Tier 1 Environmental Impact Analysis; and 3. Service Development Plan.

Rail Baltica Global Project Cost-Benefit Analysis. 24 April 2017

DEVELOPING AN INTEGRATED TRANSPORT STRATEGY FOR JORDAN: THE FOUNDATION FOR INTEGRATING JORDAN IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A REGIONAL RAIL SYSTEM

Winchester District Local Plan Part 2 Development Management and Site Allocations Publication (Pre-Submission) Plan 2015

Agenda Item 7: Strategic Transport Forum Revised Terms of Reference

Method of assessment (overview; and assessing significance of effects);

Ely Area Capacity Enhancements

Central Bedfordshire Council. COUNCIL 26 April 2018

Passenger service for the Dudding Hill line: brief for feasibility study

University Site: Land Between Madingley Road and Huntingdon Road (Parcel A); and

Leeds City Council Background Note to SAP Inspectors: 29 th September

SOUTH EAST EUROPE TRANSNATIONAL CO-OPERATION PROGRAMME

Long Term Rail Strategy Key Messages. Based on updated draft strategy January 2018

Transport Select Committee Rail Infrastructure Investment Inquiry

Management of Strategic Capacity on the Network

campaigning by the Railway Development Society Limited

Local Transport Plan. Implementation Plan ( )

Swindon Joint Strategic Needs Assessment Bulletin

Strategic Planning in the Black Country. Ian Culley, Lead Planning Manager, City of Wolverhampton Council

a. To provide a Vision for south Worcestershire to 2030.

Nottinghamshire County Council Environment. Nottinghamshire County Council

Local Transport Plan 4

Appendix 1: Draft Business Plan

DISCUSSION PAPER ON ACCESS TO SERVICE FACILITIES AND RAIL RELATED SERVICES

C11: REGENERATION, COMPULSORY PURCHASE POLICY AND OVER SITE DEVELOPMENT

CHILDREN'S SOCIAL CARE SERVICES ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY MODEL BUSINESS CASE APPROVAL

Lord Adonis Minister of State for Transport Department for Transport Great Minster House 76 Marsham Street London SW1P 4DR. 13 th February 2009,

TPS response to the National Policy Statement (NPS) on Transport

Worcestershire s Local Transport Plan (LTP) 2017

Renewable and Low Carbon Energy

Rainwise. Sustainable Drainage Solutions. Working with communities to manage rainwater. Murton, North Tyneside

Appendix A CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS

CONSULTATION PROJECT PLAN

SOUTH WEST GROUP STRATEGIC PLAN to 2025 FINAL. 5 May South West Group Strategic Plan Final 5 May 2015 Page 1

TRANSPORT AND WORKS ACT 1992 TRANSPORT AND WORKS (INQUIRIES PROCEDURES) RULES 2004 NETWORK RAIL (WERRINGTON GRADE SEPARATION) ORDER

Chichester District Council. THE CABINET (SPECIAL) 8 June 2018 THE COUNCIL (SPECIAL) 8 June 2018

Have your say on two potential new London Overground stations at Old Oak. Public consultation 16 October to 17 November 2017

The Victorian Transport Plan (Department of Transport, 2008).

ARC Freight Advisory Task Force Meeting. SOUTH FULTON COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT Multi-Modal Study

RE: Submission on the Proposed National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity

Planning For Employment and Industry in Melbourne s Growth Areas

IPSWICH NORTHERN ROUTES STUDY. Stage 1 Progress

Project Appraisal Using PRISM Simon Hubbard 28 th September 2004

Housing Association Regulatory Assessment

Strategic Rail Investment Priorities November 2017

Contents. Appendices. 1. List of evidence studies

Performance design and planning for a mature rail network

1. Government myth: Planning is acting as a serious brake on growth, slowing the delivery of much needed new jobs and new business.

This paper outlines the carbon footprint and greenhouse gas assessment for HS2 Phase One.

SECTOR ASSESSMENT (SUMMARY): URBAN TRANSPORT 1

8. Wyre Forest Emergency Services Hub Preferred Sites Consultation Responses

Local Government and Communities Committee. Planning (Scotland) Bill

Map 1. Housing Delivery The Black Country Garden City

Strategic Environmental Assessment/ Sustainability Appraisal Non-Technical Summary. Draft for Public Consultation

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF EXTERNAL AUDITOR

Maharashtra Rail Infrastructure Development Limited. Pune Nasik Double Line

Central Bedfordshire Local Plan

City of Brantford Chapter 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Session 61: Regional Transportation Planning

Assessing needs and opportunities guide for indoor and outdoor sports facilities. How to undertake and apply needs assessments for sports facilities

Safely designing High Speed Two

ACTION TAKEN UNDER DELEGATED POWERS BY OFFICER 30 June Planning Performance Agreement The Broadwalk Centre. Summary. Title

Fishermans Bend Integrated Transport Plan Peer Review John Kiriakidis, GTA Consultants 28/03/2018

CROSSRAIL INFORMATION PAPER H3 CROSSRAIL ACCESS OPTION

Brisbane Metro: Draft Design Report (DDR) Consultation Comments

What is the stakeholder relations code of practice?

Cheshire & Warrington Local Transport Body

Draft Submission to the Inquiry into National Freight and Supply Chain Priorities. August 2017

20 years of rail liberalisation in Europe: key lessons and future prospects

Strategic Transport Forum 7 th December 2018

Office of the Minister of Regional Development and Associate Minister of Transport

Strategic Transport Plan Position Statement. June 2017

Getting around in Essex A bus and passenger transport strategy summary

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

A2: FUTURE TRAIN SERVICE PATTERNS ON THE WEST COAST MAIN LINE CORRIDOR

We are Gloucestershire

Long Term Planning Process: Freight Market Study. October 2013

Invitation to Tender For the Coll Community Development Trust (CCDT) Consultancy Brief. June 2016

Transcription:

Consultation Paper Proposed Removal of Ashchurch Rail Freight Facility Scheme from Gloucestershire s Local Transport Plan June 2014

Consultation Paper Proposed Removal of Ashchurch rail freight facility scheme from Gloucestershire s Local Transport Plan Purpose: This paper sets out the reasons why Gloucestershire County Council (GCC) is consulting on the proposed removal of a potential rail freight facility scheme at Ashchurch from its list of schemes identified in the adopted Local Transport Plan (LTP). How to have your say: GCC is seeking views from stakeholders as to whether there are sound reasons for the proposed rail freight facility scheme to be retained as a potential scheme in the LTP. The consultation will run from the 9 th June 2014 for 6 weeks until 13 th July 2014. You can provide your comments through the Consult Gloucestershire website or emailed to LTP@gloucestershire.gov.uk Background: Local Transport Plan The LTP is periodically reviewed to ensure it remains fit for purpose and the schemes identified are deliverable. The existing LTP identifies a rail freight facility scheme at the Ministry of Defence (MoD) site at Ashchurch in its list of proposed schemes for the period 2014 2019. The scheme supports a wider aspiration to encourage a modal shift in freight from road to rail. At the time of writing the LTP there was no commercial freight moved by rail from the Ashchurch MOD site, but due to its location adjacent to the railway line, there is an opportunity for a rail freight facility to be part of any redevelopment of the site. National Policy Context Paragraph 31of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) states: Local authorities should work with neighbouring authorities and transport providers to develop strategies for the provision of viable infrastructure necessary to support sustainable development, including large scale facilities such as rail freight interchanges The draft National Policy Statement (NPS) for National Networks December (2013) recognises the importance of rail freight to the national economy as well as the environmental benefits of transferring freight from road to rail. It recognises the strategic importance of the rail network in transporting freight which has increased its market share considerably since the mid nineties. Paragraph 2.51 of the NPS National Networks states: The Government has therefore concluded that there is a compelling need for an expanded network of strategic rail freight interchanges (SRFI). It is important that SRFIs are located near the business markets they will serve major urban centres, or groups of centres and are linked to key supply chain routes. Given the need for effective connections for both rail and road, the number of locations suitable as SRFIs will be limited, which will restrict the scope for developers to identify viable alternative sites.

Joint Core Strategy The local authorities of Cheltenham, Gloucester and Tewkesbury have formed a partnership to produce a Joint Core Strategy (JCS) covering their administrative areas. The emerging JCS identifies a range of possible strategic development sites for housing and employment use up to 2031. The Ministry of Defence (MoD) is now closing its depot in Ashchurch with a view to selling it for redevelopment. The Draft JCS has identified this site as a strategic allocation providing a potential 2,125 dwellings and 20 hectares of employment land on the MoD site. The removal of the rail freight spur is essential to maximise the development viability of the site. Following correspondence with GCC regarding the proposed removal of the freight facility, the Defence Infrastructure Organisation (DIO) commissioned their consultants AMEC to carry out a feasibility study into a potential rail freight facility at the site. The MoD Ashchurch Freight Study was published on 24 th July 2012 by Intermodality and concluded such a facility was commercially and technically unviable at Ashchurch. The main reasons given were: There is no commercial interest in a rail freight facility at this site; Rail access is only provided from one direction (southbound) constraining the operationally of the site; Depending on the type of rail freight facility being considered, the cost of investment, relative distance from communication nodes and a lack of a defined customer demand/need in the local catchment area means that the site is unlikely to be promoted for such a development; The position of the MoD site approximately midway between Birmingham and Bristol both of whom have rail freight facilities and the proximity of the M5 linking these sites reduces the commercial need for a facility at this location. For the JCS to be found sound by a Planning Inspector, sites have to have a deliverable within the timescale of the plan. A request has been made by the JCS authorities to GCC to undertake a review of this scheme to fit the JCS delivery timetable with the aim of removing the scheme from the LTP list of schemes. Consultation For the reasons discussed above the County Council is seeking views from stakeholders as to whether they consider there are good reasons for the proposed rail freight facility to be retained as a potential scheme in the LTP. In line with the recommendations of the MoD Ashchurch Freight Study and the need for residential and employment growth within the JCS area GCC is minded to remove the scheme from it s list of schemes in LTP3. The size of the potential allocation at the MoD site and the contribution it makes to the overall housing and employment land provision in the strategy requires a degree of certainty that the site can be delivered. This is so that the JCS to be found sound and subsequently adopted by the Councils of Cheltenham, Tewkesbury and Gloucester. The MoD Ashchurch Freight Study concluded that there was no commercial interest in a possible rail freight facility at this location and there are operational constraints which impact on its viability.

The redevelopment of the site for housing and employment use will also potentially increase passenger demand at the nearby Ashchurch for Tewkesbury railway station. Therefore this may lead to train operating companies providing additional passenger services which will aid modal shift for longer distance trips. Therefore the benefits of providing a deliverable substantial brownfield site for development as part of the emerging JCS along with the opportunity for improved passenger services need to be balanced against the loss of a potential rail freight facility for the County. The consultation will run from the 9 th June 2014 for 6 weeks until 13 th July 2014. Consultation Question: Please set out any sound reasons why you believe the proposed rail freight facility scheme should be retained as a potential scheme in the LTP3? You can provide your comments through the Consult Gloucestershire website or emailed to LTP@gloucestershire.gov.uk Next Steps: Following on from the public consultation it is intended that a report will confirm the results of the consultation and give a recommendation on whether to retain the scheme or remove it from the LTP. The recommendation will be considered by GCC s Cabinet in September 2014.