Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial

Similar documents
Biffa. ces Ltd. separation at. Report. Research

Post-consumer film recycling

Post-consumer film recycling: CeDo manufacturing trial

Processing trials for household film waste

Composition of plastic waste collected via kerbside. Results of a waste compositional analysis of plastics at MRFs and PRFs

Anaerobic digestion infrastructure in the UK: September 2011

Development and optimisation of a recycling process for PET pots, tubs and trays

Integrity Seal adopted by McCain Foods (GB) Ltd

End market applications for household polyethylene film pellets

Minimum thickness of plastic bottles to be recycled research findings

McGrath works in partnership with Hackney Homes

THE FACTS: CHINA S TIGHTER CONTROLS ON THE QUALITY OF WASTE IMPORTS

THE FACTS: CHINA S TIGHTER RESTRICTIONS ON WASTE IMPORTS

Tool for measuring the recovery rates in CDEW MRFs

Construction waste collection good practice: Gloucester Quays

Reducing stretch film waste in the food. and drink sector: Good practice for buyers and users

Chapter 8 Monitoring contamination

Chilled ready meal potato mash

Business case for recycling food grade C&I PP packaging waste

REFLEX PROJECT. A summary report on the results and findings from the REFLEX project

Consumer attitudes to sustainable electrical products

Assessment form for packaging recyclability

2009 National Postconsumer Recycled Plastic Bag & Film Report

An innovative masterbatch that makes plastics oxo-biodegradable

Zero waste to landfill: Construction waste collection good practice

Design of Rigid Plastic Packaging for Recycling

Non-packaging plastics

Triggering a fresh packaging recycling trial

Report. Kerbside Recycling: Indicative Costs and Performance

Plastics Recycling Market Report - UK Analysis

SCOPE. APR s DEFINITION OF RECYCLABLE

WRAP MDD018/23 WEEE Separation techniques. Allmineral wet jigging trial report

Resource efficiency in the UK cider sector

What Really Goes in That Bale? An Overview of the National Mixed Rigid Bale Composition Study

Reduced sugar blackcurrant jam

Reaching Higher with Recycled Plastics. Richard Clark Customer Development Executive

WRAP MDD018/23 WEEE separation techniques Delft University of Technology Kinetic Gravity Separator trial report

How to transform plastic waste into paving tiles

Recycling of food grade packaging using fluorescent marks

Critical Guidance Protocol for Clear PET Articles with Labels and Closures

Plastics: Sustainability Friend or Foe? Paul Davidson Sector Specialist - Plastics

WRAP MDD018/23 WEEE Separation techniques. Visys Multi Frequency Laser trial report

WRAP MDD018/023 WEEE separation techniques Allmineral Allflux Upflow Separator trial report

GETTING THE MOST FROM PLASTICS

Packaging trial for tackling mushroom waste in the home

Opportunities for contract changes in recycling collection in the hospitality sector

To maximise recyclability and ensure the consistency in aluminium products recovered from suppliers, this specification aims to:

CONTENTS FORWARD FROM OUR DIRECTORS

Pouch Packaging: Popular, Profitable and Problematic

Making Waste Work: A Toolkit

Newport Beach, CA June 22, 2016

Reducing Waste in Sainsbury s Supermarket Refits through off site fabrication

Waste management contractors selling the benefits of your Halving Waste to Landfill Commitment to construction clients

Critical Guidance Protocol for Clear PET Resin and Molded Articles

2009 UNITED STATES NATIONAL POST- CONSUMER PLASTICS BOTTLE RECYCLING REPORT

Multi-bottle beer pack

Market Snapshot June 2017

2008 UNITED STATES NATIONAL POST- CONSUMER PLASTICS BOTTLE RECYCLING REPORT

first class - second hand

REPLACEMENT OF WASTE MATERIAL IN CONCRETE USING RECYCLED PLASTIC

Packaging Innovations and Evolution in the Food & Drinks sector

QUALITY ISSUES RELATED TO SHEET PROCESSING

2007 United States National Post-Consumer Report on Non- Bottle Rigid Plastics Recycling

American Plastics Council

compostable refuse sacks & liners

The REMIX project. The technological challenge for mixed plastics recycling

Innovative washing system helps extend potato product life and reduce water use

A deflashing media with high dimensional stability, which is also tough at low temperatures, is impact and abrasion resistant

Colour and Additive Preparations. for Extruded Polyolefin Foams

Environmental. Environmental Permits (EP) are required to operate an energy from waste facility within England and Wales. Guide page 32.

Polypropylene recovery from post consumer carpets

Successful Sales of Novel PLA Compostable Packaging into Niche Markets in the United Kingdom

Expenditure. Vehicles. Call centre cost. Marketing. Cost of reuse. Disposal

2005 NATIONAL POST-CONSUMER PLASTICS BOTTLE RECYCLING REPORT

The Many Challenges of Plastic Recycling

Trialling the re-use of used EEE from Leeds City Council HWRCs

Background. What is a bale?

Materials and Packaging Policy

polyethylene compound

2010 UNITED STATES NATIONAL POST- CONSUMER PLASTICS BOTTLE RECYCLING REPORT

WE OFFER: UV stabilizers Clarifiers or nucleating Odour absorbers Antistatics Flame retardants Antiblocks Foaming agents Dessicant MFI modifiers

GO FOAM FREE! RECYCLABLE PLASTIC TRAYS

Best Practice Construction Waste Procurement: Office Fit-Out of 15 Canada Square, Canary Wharf

PLASTINUM Foam Injection Moulding solutions.

Recycling of food grade packaging using fluorescent markers

Polyurethane. Polyurethane Recycling and Recovery. Options for Polyurethane Recycling and Recovery

FOCUS ON DESIGN: BEAUTY AND THE BUST IN AN AGE OF ANTI- PLASTIC PACKAGING.

Comparing the costs of waste treatment options

BENCHMARKING WASTE IN PLASTICS PROCESSING

Reclaim Waste, Reclaim Space, Reclaim Plastics. Alberta CARE 18 th Annual Alberta Recycling Conference

Valpak Data Solutions Packaging Waste Template Guidance) Packaging Data Template Guidance. Valpak Ltd August Valpak Data Solutions

14 plastics in the UK economy

Waste Quantification and Characterization - Faridabad (India)

Benchmark Test for Clear PET Resin and Molded Articles

WRAP MDD018/23 WEEE separation techniques. Holman Wilfley wet shaking table trial report

The extreme performance polymer: Exceed XP performance polymers. Mosha H. Zhao ExxonMobil Chemical Company February 25, 2019 Houston, TX

Working with Compostable Products: Key Lessons and Guidelines for Future Events

Harmonised Recycling Collections Costs Project: Phase One

PET Package Materials Balance

Technical and commercial considerations p. 1 Introduction p. 1 General considerations p. 1 Rigid containers p. 1 Caps, lids, closures and devices p.

Transcription:

Trial report Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial Report of panel manufacturing trial at Protomax Plastics Limited Project code: MDP041 Research date: January to March 2011 Date: September 2011

WRAP s vision is a world without waste, where resources are used sustainably. We work with businesses and individuals to help them reap the benefits of reducing waste, develop sustainable products and use resources in an efficient way. Find out more at www.wrap.org.uk Written by: Peter Behrendt, Liz Morrish and Simon Wilkinson Front cover photography: Finished panel product manufactured by Protomax WRAP and Axion Consulting believe the content of this report to be correct as at the date of writing. However, factors such as prices, levels of recycled content and regulatory requirements are subject to change and users of the report should check with their suppliers to confirm the current situation. In addition, care should be taken in using any of the cost information provided as it is based upon numerous project-specific assumptions (such as scale, location, tender context, etc.).the report does not claim to be exhaustive, nor does it claim to cover all relevant products and specifications available on the market. While steps have been taken to ensure accuracy, WRAP cannot accept responsibility or be held liable to any person for any loss or damage arising out of or in connection with this information being inaccurate, incomplete or misleading. It is the responsibility of the potential user of a material or product to consult with the supplier or manufacturer and ascertain whether a particular product will satisfy their specific requirements. The listing or featuring of a particular product or company does not constitute an endorsement by WRAP and WRAP cannot guarantee the performance of individual products or materials. This material is copyrighted. It may be reproduced free of charge subject to the material being accurate and not used in a misleading context. The source of the material must be identified and the copyright status acknowledged. This material must not be used to endorse or used to suggest WRAP s endorsement of a commercial product or service. For more detail, please refer to WRAP s Terms & Conditions on its web site: www.wrap.org.uk

Executive summary This trial report forms part of a suite of reports demonstrating the technical feasibility of using fully comingled post-consumer film packaging to manufacture products that the retail sector can adopt for use within their store networks and as part of their product ranges for customers. The overall project involves a number of upstream recyclers and downstream manufacturers manufacturing a number of different products from post-consumer films. There are a number of individual trial reports available, in addition to a summary report for the whole project: Film separation at Biffa Waste Services Limited; Processing of LDPE film at Ecoplast; CeDo manufacturing trial; Agglomeration trial at Hanbury Recycling; Centriforce manufacturing trial; Protomax manufacturing trial; and Post-consumer film recycling (overall summary report). Trials were carried out by Protomax Plastics Limited, Penclawdd, Swansea, to determine the feasibility of producing 2,440 x 1,220 x 19mm panels from UK post-consumer and retail film waste. Feed material for the trials was collected from three sources: Household waste film from comingled kerbside collections as segregated by Biffa Waste Services at its Trafford Park Materials Recovery Facility (MRF); Sainsbury s front of store and back of store collections; and Non-bottle rigid plastic post-consumer waste from Viridor s bottle recycling plant in Skelmersdale. In addition Protomax supplied recycled wheelie bin material for the panel skins. All the feed materials were handled satisfactorily by Protomax s P2 equipment; however the feed material from Sainsbury s and Viridor required a degree of hand sorting to remove contaminants; specifically metal packaging. All the panels produced met Protomax s visual requirements for dimensional conformity, and were judged to be acceptable for use as display panels or hoarding boards. Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 1

Contents 1.0 Background... 3 2.0 Trial information... 4 2.1 Description of trial host/equipment... 4 2.2 Objectives of the trial... 4 2.3 Trial feed material... 4 2.4 Trial methodology... 6 2.4.1 Initial sample preparation... 6 2.4.2 Trial procedure... 7 2.5 Product evaluation methodology... 9 3.0 Results and discussion... 10 4.0 Conclusions and recommendations... 12 List of figures Figure 1 Biffa comingled film feedstock... 5 Figure 2 Sainsbury s film feedstock material... 5 Figure 3 Viridor rigid feedstock material... 6 Figure 4 Flow diagram of pre-processing stage... 7 Figure 5 Granulated feed material... 7 Figure 6 P2 panel production process... 8 Figure 7 Cross section of Biffa/Viridor 70/30 material panel... 10 Figure 8 Example panel... 11 Acknowledgements Axion Consulting and WRAP would like to thank the staff at Protomax Plastics for their time and cooperation with this trial. Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 2

1.0 Background WRAP has commissioned Axion Consulting to demonstrate the technical feasibility of using fully comingled postconsumer film packaging in economically and environmentally viable products. The project involves Axion working with a number of manufacturing companies to trial the production of products using post-consumer films. The manufacturing trial partners and products being trialled are: CeDo: refuse sacks; Centriforce: rigid panels for use in a variety of applications including hoardings; and Protomax: rigid panels for use in a variety of applications including hoardings. There is a suite of individual trial reports available, in addition to a summary report for the whole project: Film separation at Biffa Waste Services Limited; Processing of LDPE film at Ecoplast; CeDo manufacturing trial; Agglomeration trial at Hanbury Recycling; Centriforce manufacturing trial; Protomax manufacturing trial; and Post-consumer film recycling (overall summary report). The trials used two key feedstock materials; comingled films collected from domestic kerbside recycling schemes and plastic films collected through Sainsbury s front of store and back of store collection network. In addition the Protomax manufacturing trial used non-bottle rigid plastic packaging from Viridor. Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 3

2.0 Trial information Trial host: Protomax Plastics Limited, Unit 14C Crofty Industrial Estate, Penclawdd, Gower, Swansea, SA4 3RS Trial date: Equivalent of eight days during March 2011, with Axion attending the trial on 29 th March 2011 2.1 Description of trial host/equipment Protomax is a plastic engineering company based in London, and Swansea, with machine building facilities in Piesendorf, Austria. Protomax has produced a prototype machine P2 capable of processing comingled waste streams to manufacture a range of panels, which can be used in a number of applications including for example display panels, hoardings, shutterings and security panels. The company s primary objective is to produce and sell P2 machines. An Eastern European customer has recently agreed to purchase a number of units and will be establishing production facilities within the next six months. The P2 machine at Protomax s site in Swansea is a prototype and is not optimised for regular production runs. It is primarily used to produce demonstration panels for potential customers, typically using feedstock material sourced from its own operations. However in order to generate interest in the P2 machine and utilise its capacity Protomax can undertake limited production runs for customers. By using different feed materials Protomax is able to produce application specific panels, for example ballastic and blast protective panels. Fire retardant, anti-bacterial and anti-fungal additives can also be incorporated in the panels if required by customers. The prototype P2 machine produces a standard panel 2,440 x 1,220 x 19mm, which has a smooth polymer skin of 2mm and a rigid honeycomb core of 15mm, in 30 to 40 minutes. The density of the panels can be adjusted to suit a variety of applications from rigid panels through to fairly flexible panels that can be formed into a range of cylindrical applications. The P2 system uses mixed plastic waste feed material which is typically sorted into two streams for the core and skin layers, with any contaminants being removed at this stage. The two feed streams are granulated and sieved through a 6mm screen. Depending on contamination levels the sieved material can be processed through a closed loop washing system, containing a disinfectant. The skin feed material, usually a rigid waste plastic of uniform colour, is pulverised and passed through a 500 micron mesh. Depending on the nature of the feed stream a percentage of rigid material is added to ensure the panels have the required rigidity. At this stage a nitrogen blowing agent is added to the mix to produce the core feed material. The material for the 2mm skin is fed to the P2 machine and heated. Once molten the formulated core layer is added to the mould which is closed and heated to produce a rigid panel with a honeycomb core. 2.2 Objectives of the trial The main purpose of the manufacturing trial was to run three trials to produce ten in-specification (30 panels in total) standard 2,440 x 1,220 x 19mm panels each from two key feedstock sources: Biffa and Viridor material in a 70/30 blend; Sainsbury s and Viridor material in a 70/30 blend; and Biffa and Viridor material in a 50/50 blend. A secondary objective was to visually evaluate the panels to determine if they were of sufficient quality to be used as display panels or in hoarding applications. 2.3 Trial feed material The feed material used was: Grade C film supplied by Biffa Waste Services from comingled dry recyclable household waste film, produced during normal production at Biffa's MRF facility at Trafford Park, Greater Manchester. The feed material contained paper, card, metalised film (crisp packets) and laminated film as contamination. Figure 1 shows this feedstock material; Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 4

Front of store material from Sainsbury's (primarrily carrier bags returned by customers to the store) and back of store (primarily shrink and stretch wrap and other larger films) collections, shown in Figure 2; and Non-bottle rigid plastic packaging waste from Viridor's bottle recycling plant in Skelmersdale, shown in Figure 3. The feed materials were not weighed prior to the trials but it is estimated that approximately 350kg of each feed material was utilised for the trials. Figure 1 Biffa comingled film feedstock Figure 2 Sainsbury s film feedstock material Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 5

Figure 3 Viridor rigid feedstock material Protomax also supplied a quantity of pulverised recycled wheelie bins to be used for the panel skins. This material was predominantly high density polyethylene (HDPE) but there was likely to be small quantities of medium density polyethylene (MDPE) also in the material. For standard panels the company has found a recycled polyethylene is ideally suited for skin material. Black is the standard colour of the panels however other colours can be used for the skin material if required by customers. For panels requiring a harder surface recycled polypropylene is used for the skin material. 2.4 Trial methodology 2.4.1 Initial sample preparation Prior to the manufacturing trial a number of activities were carried out by Protomax, as shown in Figure 4. Due to the presence of contamination the Sainsbury s and Viridor feedstock materials were hand sorted, after breaking open the bales, to remove large pieces of card from the Sainsbury s feed material and items of ferrous packaging from the Viridor feedstock. The level of contamination for both materials was approximately 1%. Visual inspection of the Biffa material by Protomax did not show any undesirable materials and therefore this feedstock did not require hand sorting. Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 6

Figure 4 Flow diagram of pre-processing stage High levels of dirt Washing Infeed Sorting and removal of contaminants Granulation Sieving at 6mm Low levels of dirt Further processing The three feedstock materials were granulated and sieved through a 6mm mesh screen in preparation for producing panels, as can be seen in Figure 5. The pulverised polyethylene skin material was passed through a 500 micron mesh screen in order to ensure a smooth surface for the panels. Figure 5 Granulated feed material Left: Biffa/Viridor 50/50; Centre: Sainsburys 100%; and Right: Biffa 100% 2.4.2 Trial procedure For trials 1 and 2 (Biffa/Viridor 70/30 and Sainsbury s/viridor 70/30) Protomax conducted a number of laboratory scale trials in order to determine the exact formulation for the panels. This showed that 30% of the Viridor material needed to be blended with the Biffa and Sainsbury s material in order to achieve the desired density/rigidity for the panels (0.5 kg/m 3 ). A small amount of nitrogen releasing blowing agent was also added to the mixture. The precise type and amount of blowing agent added is confidential to Protomax. Once the optimum blend ratio had been established approximately four full scale panels were produced to verify the formulation. Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 7

For the third trial there was a more equal mix of Biffa film material and Viridor rigid material. Again the nitrogen releasing blowing agent was added (the precise amount being confidential to Protomax). As with the first two trials, a number of trial panels were initially produced on the laboratory scale unit to determine the correct formulation. This was then followed by the full scale trial. The trial was delivered over a number of days, with Axion attending one day of the trial. Prior to this date Protomax had produced nine in specification panels for each of the three trials. Trial 1: Biffa/Viridor 70/30 The blend ratio for this first trial consisted of a 70/30 Biffa/Viridor blend plus a small quantity of the nitrogen blowing agent. As indicated the Viridor rigid material was added to achieve the desired rigidity for the panel. The Protomax skin material was placed in the P2 mould and heated up until the polymer had melted. The precise quantity of the blended feed material for the core layer was added volumetrically to the mould, which was then heated and allowed to cool down before the completed panel was removed and allowed to cool down to ambient temperature. During the trial the cycle time per panel was around 40 minutes. It should be noted that the usual set-up for this equipment is to have four units side by side with two operators controlling and feeding them. Using this configuration, Protomax claims to be able to produce approximately 50 panels per eight hour shift. Trial 2: Sainsburys/Viridor 70/30 The blend ratio for the core layer consisted of a 70/30 Biffa film/viridor rigids mix plus a small quantity of the nitrogen blowing agent. Apart from the change to the Sainsbury s feed material the procedure for producing the panels was the same as that described for Trial 1. Trial 3: Biffa/Viridor 50/50 The blend ratio for the core layer for this trial consisted of a 50/50 Biffa film/viridor rigids mix plus a small quantity of the nitrogen blowing agent. Apart from the change to the feed for the core layer the procedure for producing the panels was the same as that described for trial 1. Figure 6 shows an overview of the production process followed for the manufacturing trial. Figure 6 P2 panel production process Biffa MRF or Sainsburys/Jayplas Material Viridor Rigids Preprocessing Preprocessing Nitrogen blowing agent Blending to achieve correct ratio P2 Prototype Skin layer is heated until molten Core layer is added and heated to form panel Panel Product Skin material Preprocessing Pulverising Pass through 500 micron mesh Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 8

2.5 Product evaluation methodology The panels produced by the P2 machine were evaluated as follows: Visual examination of the panels surface; Panel dimensions. The standard size is 2,440 x 1,220 x 19mm and a 2% shrinkage is expected, which is catered for in the design of the P2 machine; Visual assessment of the distribution of the skin layer; and Weight of the panels. No further specific physical analysis or testing was undertaken on the panels. Protomax is able to vary its production to meet the specific needs of its customers and therefore testing and analysis is determined by the final application for the panel product. Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 9

3.0 Results and discussion General observations The three trials all produced panels that met Protomax s usual standards for use as display panels or hoarding; Visual examination of the panels surface showed a similar smooth black appearance; All the panels met Protomax s standard size of 2,440 x 1,220 x 19mm; A cross section of the panels showed a consistent distribution of the skin layer at 2mm, which totally encapsulated the panel. A skin layer of 2mm is typical for the panels. Figure 7 shows the cross section of a Biffa/Viridor 70/30 panel; The average weight of the panels was: o Trial 1: 29.9kg ranging from 29.3 to 30.1kg; o Trial 2: 30.2 kg ranging from 30.0 to 30.5kg; o Trial 3: 28.0kg ranging form 27.8 to 28.3kg; Protomax panel s can vary in weight from 17kg to 35kg, with an average of 23kg. The panels manufactured from this trial fall within this normal range of weights; Due to contamination of the Biffa feed material it gave off a rather foul smelling odour on heating. This disappeared once the panel had been removed from the mould and cooled down to ambient temperature. The odour was due to the material being unwashed and can be expected when material of this kind is used; The 50/50 Biffa/Viridor panels from Trial 3 had a less dense core compared those from Trial 1 and 2. This is due to the greater percentage of the less flexible rigid material from Viridor compared to the film material from Biffa; and On a mass balance basis no waste is generated from the core feed material (apart from the initial hand sorted card and metal removed from the feedstock materials) as it is added volumetrically to the mould. The only waste generated during the manufacturing process is a small amount of edge trim material of 400 to 450g, which is granulated, pulverised and returned for use as skin material. An example panel can be seen in Figure 8. Figure 7 Cross section of Biffa/Viridor 70/30 material panel Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 10

Figure 8 Example panel Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 11

4.0 Conclusions and recommendations The key conclusions from the Protomax trial is that all three feed materials produced panels that met the company s visual dimensional standards. The key recommendation is that the panels are suitable for use in applications such as display panels or hoarding. It is therefore recommended that products from the trials are put forward to prospective users for evaluation. A secondary recommendation is that production throughput would be increased by arranging four P2 machines in sequence in a two by two array and improving/automating some of the operations. Using this configuration the two operatives could move in sequence from one machine to the other, whilst they were in the heating and cooling phases of the process. Overall the trial demonstrated full dexterity, both of the feedstock that can be used to make the panels and the subsequent applications that the panels could be used for in a retail environment. Post-consumer film recycling Protomax trial 12

www.wrap.org.uk/plastics