MTFF Operational Design Features

Similar documents
Paper Session I-B - Industrial Reflight of Eureca Platform in 1998

Satellite Servicing in the Space Station Era

Small Satellite Rideshares on Commercial Resupply Missions to the International Space Station SmallSat Conference 2012

Paper Session III-A - Rack Level Test Facility- The Columbus APM Payload Verification Tool

SPHERES: a Laboratory for Formation Flight and Docking Research

Paper Session II-B - STS-74 SRMS- Assisted Docking of Docking Module Demonstrates ISS Assembly Technique

Paper Session I-A - Shuttle-C Heavy-Lift Vehicle of the 90's

Progress and Plans for Sierra Nevada Corporation s NextSTEP-2 Deep Space Habitat

JEM Exposed Facility System and Operation

HTV Exposed Pallet and its Mechanisms

Transitioning from Space Shuttle to Space Station On-Orbit Servicing

To understand the importance of defining a mission or project s scope.

BIG G 2 0 DEC 1967 MCDONNELL.

Commercial Crew: Progress Toward Flights

Node-2 in Place! Europe s First Module Permanently Attached to the ISS

A Comprehensive Architecture for the 21 st Century. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency

Small Satellite Rideshares on Commercial Resupply Missions to the International Space Station

IAC-17-B3.IP.6. Recent Developments on DLR`s Post-ISS Concept

Paper Session I-B - The International Space Station Partners: Background and Current Status

Scoping & Concept of Operations (ConOps) Module

Table of Contents. Article 7 -- Management Aspects of the Space Station Program Primarily Related to Detailed Design and Development 16

Building Large Space Bases in Low Earth Orbit

Table of Contents. Article 7 -- Management Aspects of the Space Station Program Primarily Related to

Scoping & Concept of Operations (ConOps) Module Exploration Systems Engineering, version 1.0

Secondary Launch Services and Payload Hosting Aboard the Falcon and Dragon Product Lines

Near-Future Reusable Space Logistics Vehicles *

From ISS to Human Space Exploration: TAS-I Contribution and Perspectives

Paper Session II-A - Space Station Requirements and Transportation Options for Lunar Outpost

Paper Session I-A - Space Shuttle, Human Space Transportation for the Next Thirty Years

Backgrounder. Boeing Defense, Space & Security P.O. Box 516 St. Louis, MO

Shuttle-C: A Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicle

Astrobee: Developing a Free-flying Robot for the International Space Station

Orbital Maneuvering Vehicle Support To The Space Station

FY17 RASC-AL Competition Questions and Responses for the Q&A Session, November 21, General. Lightweight Exercise Suite

ANNOUNCEMENT OF OPPORTUNITY. For the launch with the SPACE RIDER Re-usable Free Flyer Platform integrated with VEGA C

SSL Payload Orbital Delivery System (PODS) FedEx to GTO/GEO

SD2905 Human Spaceflight. Lecture 8, The International Space Station Part 2 - Operation

10. Test and Evaluation

SCOUT: EVA Capabilities of the Space Construction and Orbital Utility Transport

NASA s Robotic Refueling Mission

ARM Crewed Mission EVA and Sampling Activities 13th Meeting of the NASA Small Bodies Assessment Group June 29, 2015

Heather LoCrasto PI: Penina Axelrad

Orbital Express Space Operations Architecture Program

A human outpost in space bringing nations together for the benefit of life on. and beyond.

Structural Design, Analysis, and Test of the Prox-1 Spacecraft

Human-Robotic Hybrids for Deep-Space EVA: the Space Construction and Orbital Utility Transport Concept

Panel Session II - Sea Launch Overview BCSC Perspective

HUMAN-ROBOTIC HYBRIDS FOR DEEP-SPACE EVA: THE SPACE CONSTRUCTION AND ORBITAL UTILITY TRANSPORT CONCEPT David L. Akin * Mary L.

Producibility Of Advanced Launch Transportation System

GALILEO GALILEI (GG) PRELIMINARY PRODUCT TREE DRL/DRD: DEL-30

Spacecraft Housekeeping and Its Relationships to Logistics

University of Colorado Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences ASEN Project Definition Document (PDD) FeatherCraft

HTV-1 Mission Press Kit

Configuration and Structural Design

Central Thermal Bus for Micro and Small Satellites: Scalability and Adaptability

Design Project/484 Planning

Paper Session II-A - International Space Station Alpha Integrated Product Team/ Analysis and Integration Team Process

Deep Space Gateway and Journey To Mars Update

Columbus Control Centre (Monitoring and Coordination of European Mission Operations)

DEVELOPMENT OF GEOSYNCHRONOUS SATELLITE SERVICING Andrew E. Turner Space Systems/Loral. Abstract

Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites (RSGS) Program Overview

exceptional Deep Sea

Royal Aeronautical Society 3 rd European Space Tourism Conference London June 19, 2012

June, 2013 Mayumi Matsuura JAXA Flight Director Space Vehicle Technology Center Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)

Potential European-Russian Cooperation on an Advanced Crew Transportation System

ANUBIS. Payload User Guide Version 1.0 March 8 th, 2019

RESEARCH ON THE DRONE TECHNOLOGY FOR THE ISS APPLICATION TAI NAKAMURA ASIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY JAPAN AEROSPACE EXPLORATION AGENCY

Space Exploration Logistics Workshop

Planning and Execution of Tele-Robotic Maintenance Operations on the ISS

Exploration Program Status

HexPak Big Area from a Small Satellite

INVAP in Space. ITU International Satellite Symposium 2017 Bariloche, Argentina May. Commercial in Confidence 1

The Life and Biological Sciences (LaBS) Facility: An Evolution in Space Station Design

The Space Sortie Vehicle

KiloPower. A very small nuclear reactor for space applications. A presentation to:

Dream Chaser Commercial Space Program Update

A New Architecture to Explore the Potential of Lunar Resource Utilization

ALTAIR Millennium s DARPA SeeMe Commercial Satellite Solution Technical (R)evolution. Presentation to: 2014 AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites

THERMION: VERIFICATION OF A THERMIONIC HEAT PIPE IN MICROGRAVITY

A Chameleon Suit to Liberate Human Exploration of Space Environments. Ed Hodgson HSSSI October 30, 2001

Overview & Status. The Reentry Breakup Recorder (REBR) A Black Box for Space Hardware. Vinod Kapoor. August 13, Senior Project Engineer

Columbus Operations. Joint undertaking between DLR and Industry

AD REFERENDUM. On March lst, 1989, CSA assumed responsibility from MOSST for the execution of the Canadian Space Station Program.

Providing a Unique STEM Education Opportunity with a Five Day ELEO Mission

Small Orbit Transfer Vehicle (OTV) for On-Orbit Satellite Servicing and Resupply* John T. Collins, Hans F. Meissinger, Robert Bell

The International Space Station: A dream... a vision... a reality.

Columbus Operations as Long-term Manned Spaceflight Experience

Key Capabilities for Exploration Enabled by Life and Physical Sciences Research

Stratoflex High Performance Quick Disconnects and Hose Assemblies for Space Flight Applications

Exploration Missions to Host Small Payloads

Lunar Development and Exploration: A Simple, Long Lasting and Functionally Adaptable Architecture

Chapter 3 SPACE INFRASTRUCTURE

Lunar Extraction for Extraterrestrial Prospecting

Surveyor Spacecraft Total Reliability Program

Software Productivity Domains

The Shuttle Remote Manipulator System and Its Use in Orbital Operations

Satellite Servicing-Logistics Support

S.T.E.M. Integrated Robotics Detailed Outline

Paper Session III-B - Risk Management for Small Satellite Programs

Design of a Piloted Spacecraft to Bride the Gap between the Space Shuttle and Crew Exploration Vehicle

Transcription:

The Space Congress Proceedings 1987 (24th) Space - The Challenge, The Commitment Apr 1st, 8:00 AM MTFF Operational Design Features H. Friedrich MTFF Study Manager MBB/ERNO, Bremen/W. Germany A. J. Thirkettle Columbus Module Projects Manager ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk/Netherlands Follow this and additional works at: http://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings Scholarly Commons Citation H. Friedrich and A. J. Thirkettle, "MTFF Operational Design Features" (April 1, 1987). The Space Congress Proceedings. Paper 3. http://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1987-24th/session-6/3 This Event is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at ERAU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Space Congress Proceedings by an authorized administrator of ERAU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact commons@erau.edu.

MTFF OPERATIONAL DESIGN FEATURES H. Friedrich, MTFF Study Manager MBB/ERNO, Bremen/W. Germany A. J. Thirkettle, Columbus Module Projects Manager ESA/ESTEC, Noordwijk/Netherlands Abstract This paper describes the main design features incorporated in the European Space Agency's Man-Tended Free Flyer which enable the MTFF to be operational on-orbit for a 30 year period via servicing and maintenance. The MTFF is to be serviced at the Station or by Hermes every 6 months in one of two ways - using man in the Pressurized Module and using robotics for the external equipment of the PM and the Resource Module. EVA is a contingency back-up to the latter. Crew servicing inside the PM is enhanced by the proper attention to design details allowing good access to the payload and subsystem equipment in the same manner as for the Attached Modules of the Station, that is by mounting all equipment in standard racks to which the crew have easy access. Servicing of the external items is achieved by mounting them in Orbital Replacement Units (ORU's) which are compatible with the Station and/or Hermes manipulator arms. The ORU's have standardized interface provisions for end effectors and also for attachment to their parent Spacecraft. There are also non-standard ORU's such as solar arrays and comms antennae. The MTFF has attitude/orbit control, stability and position features, has RVD sensors and propulsive capabilities for orbit maintenanck, transfer and rendezvous functions. 6-44

MTFF Operational Design Features MTFF Main Features The COLUMBUS Man ~ended Eree Elyer (MTFF) presently being studied in COLUMBUS Phase B 2, represents a free flying micro-gravity laboratory for material science, fluid physics and life science payloads. It consists of a 2 segment Spacelab-type Pressurized Module (PM-2) and an unpressurized Resource Module (RM) which provides 5 kw of 120 VDC Power for payloads. Payload (P/L) operation will be by automated processing in the free flying mode while P/L processing set-up and P/L servicing, such as material resupply is conducted by astronauts in a shirt-sleeve environment when the MTFF is connected to a servicing base. The MTFF design concept provides compatibility with the following servicing bases: ISS or HERMES or NSTS. Here also the MTFF spacecraft and its subsystems will be serviced. To enable this, the MTFF has to be designed for in-orbit replacement of P/L and of subsystem assemblies or components and for resupply of consumables. Fig. 1 depicts the flight configuration of the MTFF, showing the Resource Module (RM) with the deployed 20 kw solar array (end of life power) and antenna and also the main thrusters for orbit transfer manoeuvres. Connected to the RM is the Pressurized Module (PM-2) with body mounted thermal radiators. The radiators reject via a fluid loop the waste heat of the PM-2 and of the RM. The radiator also contributes to the meteoroid and debris protection of the PM-2. The internal environment of the PM-2 is the same as that of the ISS, of HERMES and of the NSTS, i.e. 1 atmosphere shirt sleeve. &45

To enable berthing and physical connection of the MTFF to the respective servicing base, the free flyer provides a pressurized docking port at the PM-2, an unpressurized berthing interface at the opposite end,(i.e. at the RM) and various grapple fixtures on both the PM-2 and RM. Also on Fig. 1 the main features of the MTFF are listed. The P/L mass of 2000 kg applies to the MTFF launch and can be increased to 5000 kg by installation of additional P/L facilities during on-orbit servicing. The 900 kg propellant also applies to the launch case. More propellant can be loaded on-orbit to increase the refuelling intervals. The launch configuration, shown in Fig. 2 indicates that the MTFF is launched by ARIANE 5 in one shot, fully integrated and with the RM located on top of the PM-2. Mission Scenario The mission orbit profile of the MTFF is arranged such that the free flyer orbit remains on average co-planar with that of the ISS, allowing rendezvous with the ISS for Payload servicing at intervals of 180 days. After each servicing event the MTFF performs a boost-up manoeuvre with a subsequent free drifting flight without doing any further orbit corrections. In this way it is possible to achieve the-undisturbed micro-gravity environment of levels down to 10-6 g (< 1 Hz). In the HERMES servicing scenario, the MTFF will also fly co-planar with the ISS in order to allow servicing at the ISS in a contingency and/or mixed mode situation. The mission profile for a MTFF mission period of e.g. 180 days is shown on Fig. 3. The MTFF carries out the orbit transfer manoeuvres and rendezvous operations by means of its attitude and orbit control system which incorporates also RVD sensors (rendezvous and docking) and cold gas propulsion for proximity operations with manned vehicles.

While the MTFF is designed to support P/L servicing at intervals ranging from 30 to 180 days, scheduled MTFF-spacecraft (i.e. subsystem) servicing is intended to take place at longer intervals, of 2 or more years. The propellant tanks are sized to carry fuel for more than 2 years mission operation between refuelling. MTFF Design for On-Orbit Servicing The MTFF design concept is based on an on-orbit life requirement of 30 years. Particular measures have therefore to be applied to achieve this life. The respective measures are summarized in Table 1. The primary structure of the free flyer elements (PM-2 and RM) will be designed and the material selected in accordance with the 30 years life requirement. Also repair methods have to be applied and proper access to critical areas provided to enable the correction of damage, stemming from for example meteoroid impact. Functional components such as computers, gyros and in particular batteries, cannot be designed for 30 years life. On-orbit replacement must therefore be possible. Equipment accommodated inside the PM-2 is accessible by astronauts and will hence be designed for replacement by IVA. standardized replacement units in the form of P/L or S/S racks are widely used to facilitate the maintenance activities. The RM equipment cannot be replaced by IVA since it is located in unpressurized areas. In order to avoid excessive EVA during maintenance, the external ORUs should be replaceable by robotic means i.e. by manipulators. For this reason most of the RM equipment is accommodated in "standard", manipulator-compatible ORUs. Some of the components of the MTFF, e.g. radiators of the PM-2, the solar array and antenna of the RM cannot be made to fit a standardized ORU packaging due to their size and shape. They are also of complex mechanical design. These components are also replaceable on-orbit but will need EVA as a back-up during replacement. The partitioning of the RM into standard and non-standard ORUs is shown on Fig. 4. 6-47

MTFF Serviced at the ISS The final attitude for ISS manipulator pick up of the MTFF is depicted on Fig. 5. The free flyer performs active rendezvous with the ISS until pick-up by the station's manipulator arm. The final approach of the MTFF is to the same position to which the NSTS flies when it visits the station. After pick-up, the MTFF is transfered by the ISS manipulator to its berthing/docking node to which it is connected. The free flyer in its final servicing position is shown in Fig. 6. All appendages (e.g.solar array, antenna) are retracted and the MTFF gets its resources from the ISS through functional interface connectors, provided in the pressurized docking/berthing adapter. During rendezvous operations the position and velocity of the MTFF relative to the ISS will be determined by the use of the following means provided by the free flyer: Long range: Differential GPS (Global Positioning System) measurements Medium range: Laser sensor Short range: Camera Range and range rate information of the MTFF will be transmitted to the ISS crew to allow monitoring and if necessary safe interruption of the rendezvous manoeuvre. Internal servicing of the PM-2 is indicated in Fig.7. The location of the MTFF at the ISS is adjacent to the station's Logistic Module. Thus no working area has to be passed through when transfering items from or to the PM-2. Crew servicing inside the PM-2 is enhanced by the proper attention to design details, allowing good access to the P/L and S/S equipment in the same manner as for the Columbus Attached Module of the station, that is by mounting, as already explained, in standard racks. The size of these racks allows the transfer of single as well as double racks from the MTFF through the hatch of the docking port into the Logistic Module. &48

For external servicing (i.e. RM servicing) the MTFF may be moved to the station's servicing bay where the external standard ORUs can be replaced by the remote manipulator of the ISS, or it may be possible to remove/replace the ORU's by manipulator at the logistics module node. Refuelling of MTFF propellant can be done by exchange of the two propulsion ORU's, also using the station's manipulator. MTFF Servicing by HERMES or NSTS For the rendezvous with HERMES the MTFF is converted into a passive but cooperative mode with HERMES performing the active rendezvous function. The rendezvous approach configuration for PM-2 servicing is shown in Fig. 8. The resupply material for the P/L as well as the P/L and (internal) S/S spares are transported by HERMES in a "HERMES dedicated" pressurized Logistic Module (LM). Since the HERMES airlock port size is different to that of the PM-2 (ISS) the LM, having two different port sizes, is used as an adapter between the HERMES airlock and the PM-2 docking adapter. In the docked mode the MTFF provides electrical power to HERMES during most of the servicing time. The combined MTFF/Hermes assembly will be stabilized in its attitude by cooperative attitude control, i.e. using the Hermes computer as the master which then commands actuators, located in Hermes as well as in the MTFF. Transportation of P/L or S/S racks from PM-2 to the HERMES LM is depicted in Fig. 9. As can be deduced from this figure, the inline arrangement of the MTFF and the LM has the advantage that racks need not to be moved around corners. 6-49

As already mentioned under the headline "Mission Scenario", MTFF-Spacecraft servicing will not be performed at nominal P/L servicing events. At intervals of 2 to 3 years, the S/Ss will be serviced and the MTFF refuelled via a dedicated HERMES flight. The MTFF/HERMES configuration for RM servicing is shown in fig. 10. The free flyer is mounted on a telescopic mast which is located behind the HERMES cabin. The mast provides +/- 180 rotation in 90 steps to enable the HERMES manipulator to reach all ORU's around the RM. The telescopic mast is sufficiently long to give proper clearance to the HERMES airlock, allowing EVA in case it will be required. Fig. 11 shows the exchange of standard ORU's. All non-standard ORU's of the MTFF are also HERMES compatible. As the propulsion subsystem is accommodated in two standard ORU's, refuelling can be conveniently accomplished by ORU replacement. 6-50

CJ) Oi FEATURES: 2 SEGMENTS: PRESS. MODULE + RESOURCE MODULE SERViCE VEHICLE: HERMES OR USSS OR NSTS MASS: 16250 kg LAUNCH 2000 kg P/L 900 kg FUEL AT LAUNCH POWER: 9,6 kw TOTAL 5,0 kw TO P/L ORBITS: 490-463 km 0 28 INCL. OPERATIONAL 463 km; 28,5 SERVICING BY HERMES OR NSTS 490 km; 28,5 SERVICING BY USSS MICROGRAVITY: 10-6. g (~ 1 Hz) Fig. 1 MAN TENDED FREE FLYER CONFIGURATION

// // \\ \\ II II II 11 0 0 O"' t0 LO ~ 0 "' 2 0 ~ <( a: :::> CJ u:: 2 0 (.) ::c (.) 2 lf) :::> ~ t0 (\J <!...J u.. u.. I- :a: N d> u:: 6-52

H (km) MTFF mission prof i 1 e USSS mi.ssion profile.sf:... MTFF. servicing. at USSS ---.-ir- -- --- MTfF orbit (tp;.n) correction period 400 starting point for 1. mission 0 90 180 1) alternative servicing by Hermes or NSTS Fig. 3 MTFF MISSION SCENARIO 6-53

Table 1: Measures to achieve 30 years Operational Life Design of primary structure for 30 years on-orbit. life. Provide access to critical areas (e.g. internal surface of pressure shell) to enable on-orbit repair. Accommodation of all functional assemblies/components as "Orbital Replacement Units"... ORU Standard ORUs: -- Racks for P/L and S/S in PM-2... replacement by astronauts -- Drawer type units in RM... replacement by manipulator Non-Standard ORUs: -- Radiators on PM-2 ~ -- Solar Array; Antenna on RM ~... replacement by manipulator with EVA back-up Standard ORUs contain equipment of higher replacement frequency

Antenna Package C::"' '; I~ Main Body Primary ~ r I I r Str~cture with 2 Fix.~ Rad1ator Panels ' Antenna Ma s t,=,,,._~..._ ~~ ~~~~e~~(ipipe- O'> Ui (J1 Launch Support Structure ~ RU's ;:;~andard 0 Prop. ~ I. A/ORU --... ~Antenna Boom Fig. 4 ORU PARTITIONING OF THE RESOURCE MODULE Solar ' Solar Array Mast I ~~~:~s-p"j II ii J

. '.... -.----. I I I _J 6-56

Fig. 6 MTFF DOCKED TO USSS 6-57

NODE MTFF Fig. 7 MTFF DOCKED TO USSS NODE 6-58

(/) w :E cc w :c > cc c w (..) > cc w (/) u.. u..... :?: CIO.0, u:: 6-59

'. ' ' l ---,.,,..----=-'. I i;,j I Fig. 9 CARGO TRANSFER FROM LOGISTIC MODULE TO MTFF 6-60

Fig. 10 MTFF SERVICED BY HERMES 6-61