Gypsum-based management practises to prevent phosphorus transportation

Similar documents
Bibliografiska uppgifter för Gypsum-based management practices to prevent phosphorus transportation

Reducing agricultural phosphorus load by gypsum: results from the first year after amendment

NJF Report Vol. 2 No

NJF Report Vol. 2 No

Nutrient Management. The width of the buffer strip depends on slope, soil, runoff volume, sediment load and type of vegetation.

Modelling agricultural nutrient loading from Finnish watersheds

Tillage systems for the benefit of agriculture and the environment Nordic Agricultural Academy, Odense, Denmark, May 2006

Long-Term Management of lake Pyhäjärvi Field-Scale Experiments in an Agricultural Catchment. Teija Kirkkala Executive Director, PhD

Phosphorus Transport From the Soil to Surface Water

AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX III OF THE HELSINKI CONVENTION CONCERNING REGULATIONS ON PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM AGRICULTURE

AMENDMENTS TO ANNEX III CRITERIA AND MEASURES CONCERNING THE PREVENTION OF POLLUTION FROM LAND-BASED SOURCES OF THE 1992 HELSINKI CONVENTION

Controlling runon and runoff:

Agricultural phosphorus losses and eutrophication in Nordic-Baltic countries

MANAGING PHOSPHORUS LOSSES. Rich. McDowell, AgResearch

NJF Report No Seminar No Technology for milking and housing of dairy cows. Hamar, Norway, Feb 2002

Institute of Ag Professionals

NJF Report Vol. 2 No

NJF Report Vol. 2 No

The Phosphorus Management Tool

The national-level nutrient loading estimation tool for Finland: Watershed Simulation and Forecasting System WSFS-Vemala

Should we focus only on P load when aiming to reduce eutrophication in a P-limited aquatic system?

Salt-Clay Interactions: Reducing Sediment Loads and Erosion at Snow Storage Sites

How the combat against eutrophication has progressed? and what should we do next?

The Impact of Phosphorus Limiting Regulations on Land Application. A Contractor s Perspective

NJF Report Vol. 2 No

Summary of Water Monitoring Data

Official Journal of the European Union DECISIONS

Calculating the Fertilizer Value of Manure from Livestock Operations

This powerpoint has been adapted from a presentation at the Agronomy Society of America meetings in San Antonio, Texas in October 2011.

Acidity and Alkalinity:

Managing Soil Fertility. Teagasc Soil Fertility Management Spring 2015

The effect of gypsum on phosphorus losses at the catchment scale

HOW CHANGES IN NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT REGULATIONS WILL AFFECT FORAGE PRODUCTION

Phosphorus Product Properties for 4R Nutrient Stewardship. Tom Bruulsema, Phosphorus Program Director, IPNI

PHOSPHORUS DYNAMICS & POLLUTION

introduction Agdex 090-4

In this document we give a brief description of the products, their specifications and suitable applications.

EXTENSION Know how. Know now. EC195 (Revised August 2012)

Baltic Impulse 2 nd workshop in Berlin

Industrial Animal Farms in Sweden Industrial Animal Farm Conference Warsaw, Poland 6 December 2013

Agriculture and eutrophication facts and myths

Pacific Fertiliser Pty Ltd PFGR2015

Study Questions Exam 5

Baltic Manure. Baltic Forum for Innovative Technologies for Sustainable Manure Management

and potential for future research -Perspectives from Norway Marianne Bechmann Svein Skøien Bioforsk Jord og miljø

Soil and Water Conservation Research under Intensive Potato Production Systems in New Brunswick

Phosphorus Chemistry and Sequestration in Soil

Effects of climate change and agricultural adaptation on nitrogen loading from Finnish watersheds simulated by VEMALA model

Improvement of phosphorus availability by agricultural practices: crop residues management & recycling OM waste first results

Reducing Phosphorus Loss to Lake Erie: Application & Timing of Nutrients. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (OMAFRA)

Catchment work around Lake Vesijärvi Mirva Ketola Lake Vesijärvi Foundation Hola Lake workshop 1 Lahti

EQ: How are nutrients recycled throughout the environment?

Long-term effect of various fertilizing strategies on soil organic carbon, crop yield, soil P availability and potential P leaching

AGRICULTURE MARKING SCHEME FORM TWO SCHEME TERM

Chapter 4: Advanced Wastewater Treatment for Phosphorous Removal

Agricultural-Driven Eutrophication

Challenges of Soil Nutrient Management

33. Fate of pesticides in soil and plant.

Very slight to negligible limitations no special land management practices required.

CHAPTER # 4. Fate of Pollutants in the Environment

Filtering phosphorus out of surface runoff with a phosphorus removal structure

4R Phosphorus Management for Sustainable Crop Nutrition

Introduction. Manure Management Facts Prioritization and Rotation of Fields for Manure Application. July 2014

Nutrient Management for Vegetable Production

ARE ALL fertilizers the same? Of

Phosphorus Dynamics and Mitigation in Soils

NJF Report Vol. 1 No NJF-Seminar 372. Manure - an agronomic and environmental challenge

Soil Regulations and Their Practical Impact on the Daily Work of a German Farmer. Dr. Christian Ahl

The rest of this article describes four biogeochemical cycles: the water cycle, carbon cycle, nitrogen cycle, and phosphorous cycle.

REDUCTION OF POLLUTION FROM DISCHARGES INTO WATER, EMISSIONS INTO THE ATMOSPHERE AND PHOSPHOGYPSUM OUT OF THE PRODUCTION OF FERTILIZERS

Proposal by Russia to delete hot sub-spot Hot sub-spot name South-West Wastewater Treatment Plant

Improving manure recycling in agriculture an important step towards closing the phosphorus cycle

Baltic Farmers Forum on Environment! Liisa Pietola/MTK NBC Presidium Hämeenlinna, 17 August 2017

Phosphorus Update. Addy Elliott Colorado State University Department of Soil and Crop Sciences

The Potash Development Association Potash for Organic Growers

NRCS s Soil Health Initiative and its Relationship to Water Quality

FIELD PHOSPHORUS RISK ASSESSMENT

Phosphorus for the Ontario CCA 4R Nutrient Management Specialty

Symposium sur les eaux usées. Boucherville. October 24 th 2013

Baltic Deal seminar Nutrient Balance Calculations April, 2013 Latvian Rural Advisory and Training Centre Latvia

What is the Vadose Zone? Why Do We Care? Tiffany Messer Assistant Professor Biological Systems Engineering School of Natural Resources University of

Chapter 2.3. Manure and Fertilizer as Sources of Nutrients and Potential Environmental Hazards. learning objectives

Brian Hite. Research Assistant - CUW Environmental Science - UWT Civil and Environmental Engineering - UW

A Technology for Enhanced Control of Erosion, Sediment and Metal Leaching at Disturbed Land Using Polyacrylamide and Magnetite Nanoparticles

Agricultural Phosphorus Management: Protecting Production and Water Quality

How Phosphate is Mined and Processed

Phosphorus (P) Soil Tests?

2016 HLWD WATER QUALITY RESULTS CATHERINE WEGEHAUPT WATERSHED TECHNICIAN JULY 2017 BOARD MEETING

Liberia REMEDIATION AND DISPOSAL OF SULPHUR CONTAMINATED SOLID WASTES. May 1996 GUIDELINES FOR THE ENVIRONMENT

PRODUCT RANGE GRENA GRENA EXTRA GRENAGRO SPECIAL BIOSTAR

The Inconvenient Reality: The Impact of Alternative Energy on Agriculture and Key Materials

A Greener Agriculture for a Bluer Baltic Sea. Helsinki From words to actions catalysing change

Phosphorus Kyle Minks Land and Water Resources Scientist Land Conservation Division

Best Management Practices to Minimize Nutrient Losses from Manured Fields. Hailin Zhang. Oklahoma State University

Particulate Soil Phosphorus and Eutrophication in Lakes and Streams

Technical Solutions for Erosion Control and Water Clarification using Polyacrylamide (PAM) and PAM Blends

East TX Test Site (1/2 Treated)

Indiana NRCS new conservation practice standard for gypsum opens door for financial assistance

Using Soil Tests for Soil Fertility Management

Appleton Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Management Program

Transcription:

Gypsum-based management practises to prevent phosphorus transportation Liisa Pietola Research Centre Hanninghof, Yara Yara Suomi Mechelininkatu 1a PO Box 900 FIN-00181 Helsinki NJF seminar 401 on Phosphorus management in Nordic-Baltic agriculture reconciling productivity and environmental protection 22-23.9.2008

Contents 1. Background 2. Introduction to the principles Gypsum as soil amendment Gypsum-based precipitate in manure treatment 3. Testing principles: preliminary studies 2006-2007 4. Testing principles in full scale 2008-2010 5. Conclusions

1. Background The eutrophication of the Baltic Sea is severe: many efforts are currently underway to improve the situation. the phosphorus transportation from agricultural soils should be strongly limited Hot spots for P losses from agriculture Erodible clayed fields: With slopes Without slopes during snow-melt period and rains soil particles escape fields transporting P to waters Fields with high soil test P: Fields used for sugar beets, vegetables etc. (non-grains) Fields where manure has been spread for years on N content basis P surplus in manure use: Pig manure P:N 1:3 vs. cereals 1:6 or grasses 1:9

1. Background Farmers need specific tools to control P losses in addition to best management practises like drainage and liming Reduced tillage direct sowing Constructed wetlands Buffer zones + Chemical methods P absorption In-field not out For crop reuse no too strong precipitation mechanisms Our targets

2. Introduction to the principles - Approach to keep P in soil (root zone) as a part of ecological cycle for continuous use in agriculture by addition of Ca-based amendments - Focus on gypsum based products for environment tools in farming with two main applications: 1. Gypsum as soil amendment enhancing phosphorus trapping - by erosion / particle P control via improved soil aggregation - by P leaching control via enhanced adsorption on particle surfaces 2. Gypsum in liquid manure treatment for phosphorus fractioning - P-free effluent after solid removal and settling of phosphates - P-rich solids at the bottom of farm pit I Soil application II Manure Kuva: application Asko Kinnunen

Both tools base on utilization of Siilinjärvi phosphogypsum CaSO 4. 2H 2 O is by-product produced by wet process phosphoric acid by the reaction of phosphate rock with sulphuric acid Originates from Siilinjärvi phosphate rock Figs: Asko Kinnunen

PRINCIPLE 1. Liquid Manure treatment - P fractioning on focus Precipitate (0,2-0,5 %) 1. Precipitate powder/fine granules 2. Stirring 3. Sedimentation by settling 4. For NK-fertilizer use no / low P high P 5. For NPK-fertilizer or energy production Ca-phosphates MgNH 4 -phosphate P available for crops

Testing principle ws P concentration in upper part of the manure ph 8.4 Ortho-P (mg/kg) in liquid phase: Fig: S. Alasuutari 14 May 20 May 30 May Sampled from 0-10 cm, May 21 and 30 also from 30 cm (no differences between depths)

Testing principle 2006-07: Application with liquid pig manure (at 15-20 degrees C, after 1-2 days) 1 big bag gypsum-based precipitate is mixed into the slurry container (90 m 3 ) P 100 m 3 P-tot 105 kg P-ws 73 kg Precipitate Powder at ~5 kg/tn 70-80 m 3 100 m3 P-tot 5 kg P-ws 2 kg P-tot 5 kg P-ws 2 kg DM 2% ph 8.5 P-free effluent after solid removal by settling = NK fertilizer P-rich solids* = P-fertilizer/for energy 20-30 m 3 P-tot 100 kg P-ws 40 kg * Ca-phosphates MgNH 4 -phosphate P available for crops (unlike Al- or Fe-phosphates)

PRINCIPLE 2. Soil treatment -P trapping into soils on focus By controlling P transportation through runoff / erosion: typically particle P or drainage water: typically soluble P Fig: Asko Kinnunen Aiming to keep P usable for crops: Chemical treatment on Ca-based compounds Ca-sulphate dissolves readily and Increases soil Ca and EC Which enable P trapping PO 4 3- P in leaching water by in mass flow: decreases by increased EC P in particles in runoff: decreases by aggregation by increased Ca

P µg Testing principle 2008: Laboratory results from incubation-leaching tests 4500 Kipsimuhitus Loamy soil, 2_06: test Fosforin P huuhtoutuminen 6 mg/l; ph 6,9; EC 0.1 (P-fertilization 10 mg/l) 4000 3500 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 206 211 270 204 273 354 433 479 575 938 138 167 182 143 151 183 175 224 271 Each box represents ws P / 300 ml watering which was percolated through soils EC ~ 0.2 µs/mm 117 94 110 99 89 49 93 99 95 133 91 154 128 128 146 182 209 212 93 79 72 43 91 137 144 171 240 552 510 441 535 0 2,1 3,2 4,2 6,3 63d 56d 49d 42d 35d 28d 21d 14 d 7 d 1d Gypsum g / ½ l soil

P µg/pot NTU Testing principle 2007-08: Laboratory results for different soils after 5 months incubation with wettingdrying cycles, no P fertilization Turbidity 24.1.2008 =TOT-P 200 150 100 50 0 P (µg/pot) 24.1.2008 P-36 loam P-6 loam P-11 fine sand 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 P-9 clay P-13 organic P-36 loam P-6 loam P-11 fine sand = Ws-P no gypsum gypsum P-9 clay P-13 organic no gypsum gypsum Numbers represent soil test-p (mg/l soil, with acid AAc extraction) Phosphorus in percolated water from gypsum treated (4 g per soil litre) soil columns, control (no gypsum) (n=3)

4. Testing principles in full scale 2008-2010 by TraP project / Yara s environmental research on water quality In-field P trapping = TraP and Recycle

TraP - Novel gypsum-based products for farm scale phosphorus trapping Under farm conditions & at catchment scale With Finish Funding Agency for Technology (Tekes) support Yara coordinates and purchases research from partners SYKE Finnish Environment Institute MTT Agrifood Research Finland Plant production Economics TTS Work Efficiency Institute Luode Consulting Ltd. Yara focus on R&D on product recipes, quality control, manufacturing and logistics: In co-operation with other partners: Water Protection Association of The River Vantaa and Helsinki region Uusimaa Environment Centre, local farmers

Conclusions / Project mission Significant agricultural P load decrease on waters is observed 1. In accordance with the goals set by the Government of Finland in national water protection policy 2. HELCOM & Practical methods to achieve the load decrease is developed 1. Provide solutions for farmers to be used in hot spots of P-loading: erodible soils high P status soils; by better manure management 2. Are included into the Finnish agri-environmental support scheme Practical methods includes: Gypsum as soil amendment for erosion and soluble P control Gypsum-based precipitate in manure treatment to fractionate P