City Council Workshop Agenda Item #2

Similar documents
Task 5: Goals, Objectives, and Performance Measures

We make trains run. 75 West Commercial Street Suite 104 Portland, Maine Tel

APPENDIX B - GLOSSARY FEBRUARY 2017

Pierce County Waterborne Transportation Study. WTS Advisory Committee Meeting DRAFT. WTS Advisory May Committee 27, 2015 Meeting

Metro s Guide to Accessibility and Independence

Efficient. Enhanced. Improved. Department of Community Services

Meeting Facilitator Gavels in Meeting and Presenter Comes to the Podium.

Highlights of the Regional Transit Partnership June 27, 2018 Strategic Planning Retreat. Draft #2: July 20, 2018

Kansas City Streetcar Authority KC Streetcar Sponsorship Program Request for Proposal May 2016

Conceptual Development Schedule for Business Plan FY2020 FY2024 & Budget FY2020

Transit Effectiveness Project (TEP) and Related Transit Initiatives

Guemes Ferry Ticketing

Miami-Dade Transit. Alice N. Bravo, P.E. Director. Miami-Dade Transit 1

Integrating Intercity & High-Speed Rail with Local Transit: the MBTA Experience

COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE AND MARKETING STUDY

Traveler Information Systems

Rail Decentralisation: Devolving decision-making on passenger rail services in England Response from Campaign for Better Transport

PROTECTING Our Quality of Life... Why the Capital Region Needs to Invest in Mass Transit NOW

11. MARKETING AND OUTREACH

Draft Strategic Mobility Plan Short-Term Action Plan 2018 to 2022

Public Input CHAPTER II INTRODUCTION COMMUNITY ADVISORY GROUP (CAG)

FSB Wales response to Cardiff Council

FARE INTEGRATION AND DEVELOPING A COMMON MOBILITY CARD FOR AICTSL DIFFERENT SERVICES.

ONE CALL-ONE CLICK Profiles MANITOWOC COUNTY, WISCONSIN

Transit System Survey

Transit Development Plan. January 2016 Update

WELCOME. Nanaimo Harbour and Gabriola Island Terminal Development Plans (TDPs)

September 2015 Governor s Transportation Vison Panel Discussion

Trapeze is At Your Service with Paratransit Health Checks. September 9, 2015

have your say Review of local transport services in Tyne and Wear

THE NEXT MEETING IS MAY 19, 2015 AT 4:00 PM.

Marketing by Mode Express Bus Service. Doris Williams, Marketing and Communications, Broward County Transit

Introduction. McLennan County Transit Need Study

TRANSIT SYSTEM SUMMARY REPORT

Northern Intermodal Transit Facility WHAT IS AN INTERMODAL TRANSIT FACILITY?

The Transportation District Commission of Hampton Roads, representatives include

OMNITRANS. Established in 1976 Serving the San Bernardino Valley. 16 Million Passengers Per Year Three Facilities Fleet. 15 Cities 480 Square Miles

RIPTA Fare Study An Evaluation of RIPTA s Fare Policies, Fare Products and Fare Payment Systems

PRTC Strategic Plan Recommendations

Innovative E-Fare TriMet in Portland Metropolitan Area

Strategic Transit Plan

Inclusive Coalition Building. Lewis and Clark County Case Study

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY. Nevin Grinnell Marketing January 10, 2012

MOVING TOGETHER. A Coast-to-Coast Adventure Featuring TripSpark Customers! TOGETHER MOVING

Welcome to the Everett Transit Long Range Plan Visioning Workshop

Innovative E-Fare for TriMet in Portland

ETS Branch Highlights Report

PACTS. Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System. Destination 2040

WRTA Ads can reach over 500,000 people every single day! Improve the Results of

PUBLIC TRANSIT IMPROVEMENTS THAT WOULD BETTER SERVE OLDER PERSONS

Setting up a five agency Electronic Fare Management (EFM) system in the Florida Suncoast region

CITY OF SIMI VALLEY MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: UPDATE REPORT AND DISCUSSION REGARDING THE SHORT RANGE TRANSIT PLAN AND TRANSIT FLEET ASSESSMENT

Proposed Overnight Service Pilot

ARLINGTON COUNTY TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN

WM Franchise. Central and Local Government Building a Strong Alliance. November Moving Britain Ahead. None

I am pleased to present you with the Riders Advisory Council report for March 2009.

2040 STRATEGIC PLAN. January we move people

PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION PLAN

Quad Cities Coordination and Consolidation Analysis

Staff Report. Allocation of Congestion Management and Air Quality Improvement Program Funding

The Bus Stop. Hickory Transfer Center

COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE TECHNOLOGY IMPROVEMENTS RECEIVE AND FILE STATUS REPORT

Regional Transit Plan. Chapter 1 & 2

City of Ellensburg. Public Transit Advisory Committee Agenda City Council Conference Room (FIRST FLOOR) City Hall March 20, :30 PM

North Side Transfer Zone. Public Open House April 16, 2014

CDTA COMMITTEE AGENDA Strategic and Operational Planning Committee Thursday, April 18, :00 PM 110 Watervliet Avenue, Albany

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 1.1 Introduction

Transit Investment Direction and Plan Introduction. Transportation Advisory Board TPP Workshop August 16, 2017

Forming New Transit Authorities - How to Regionalize Transit

Adoption of New DART Service Standards

WELCOME. Swartz Bay Terminal Development Plan (TDP)

Local Transport Powers

SACOG Board of Directors

Prague Integrated Transport (PID) Contract Management

10. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT, LEADERSHIP, AND OVERSIGHT GUIDELINES

Los Angeles County One Gateway Plaza zi3.gzz.zooo Tel Metropolitan Transportation Authority Los Angeles, CA gooiz-2952 rnetro.net

Caltrain Fare Study Update

Prioritization of Capital Needs Inventory

Pennsylvania Transit Consolidation Report

Pacific Northwest High Speed Rail Corridor Amtrak Cascades Passenger Service Update

Smart and Integrated Ticketing Update

Around 33 million journeys are currently made on Metrolink every year. This is forecast to increase to 44 million journeys by 2019.

OC Transpo Safety & Security Peer Review Provided by the American Public Transportation Association

Chapter 6 Transit 2025 Sketch Plan ---Long Range Plan Project Elements

Urban Pathways. FACTSHEET on Integrated Fare Systems

IMPERIAL VALLEY COLLEGE/SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY TRANSIT STUDY DRAFT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM: Implementation of Recommended Plan

OCTA REGIONAL FARE COLLECTION STRATEGY. 5 th Annual Smart Card Alliance Payment Summit February 9, 2012

Management / Financial Advisory Committee Hampton Roads Transit 3400 Victoria Blvd., Hampton, VA, 2nd Floor Board Room 1:30 PM, Monday, July 24, 2017

Customer Experience & Satisfaction Lessons from the 2018 Rider Survey

FY 2018 Proposed Budget Budget Work Session Follow-up

Public transport integration. Mohamed Mezghani Project Manager

PURPOSE. Joint Transportation Committee (JTC) directed to:

DAVIS COMMUNITY TRANSIT

October 31, Honorable Patty Murray United States Senate Washington, DC. Dear Senator Murray,

Caltrain Planning Update

Spring PERFECTING The Passenger Experience. Selena Barlow

DAVID CARTER, DIRECTOR OF INFRASTRUCTURE

Locally Preferred Alternative. Work In Progress; Subject To Change Without Notice 1

W O R K F O R C E D E V E L O P M E N T, BUSINESS, AND TRANSPORTATION

Transcription:

City Council Workshop Agenda Item #2 September 9, 2013 GPCOG - Branding and Marketing In July of 2012, the City of South Portland and its Bus service joined Casco Bay Island Transit District, Greater Portland Transit District (METRO), Biddeford-Saco Old Orchard Beach (BSOOB) ShuttleBus/Zoom, York County Community Action Corporation (YCCAC) and Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) in an effort to lead them toward closer system integration. The hope was to adopt a regional branding and marketing plan that included a unified logo for all transportation fleets (where appropriate), a common regional brand, a regional website, unified displays and promotional materials, and other relevant areas for coordination. A Branding and Market Committee was formed and has met several times between November 2012 and April 2013. The following recommendations were made by the Committee to implement the Branding and Market project: 1. Regional Transit Logo The Committee recommends developing one umbrella logo to be used in a variety of ways including all promotional materials, transit guides, web information, etc. by all of the providers in order to tie the services together. This logo is not to supersede each providers existing individual logo. It was acknowledged that the train and ferries cannot put the logo on their vehicles and vessels, but they can use it in a variety of ways including kiosks in the lobbies of their waiting rooms. There are a few ideas for the development of the logo. One is to sponsor a design contest, the other is to hire a consultant to develop a logo that includes a graphical representation of each of the providers into one logo. 2. Color Scheme The Committee recommends adopting one color scheme to be used in all promotional materials, transit guides, web information, bulletin boards, etc., and using that color scheme for the three fixed-route providers busses, phased in over time. It also recommends keeping the front of all the busses free of advertising so that the front of each bus and vehicle looks similar and can be identified by the rider as such. It was recommended that the Committee work with a designer to come up with color scheme as different colors construe different messages. 3. Website The Committee recommends one coordinated website for use by the three fixed-route bus providers. It was recommended that this be implemented in two phases. The first phase would create a splash webpage in which an overview of all transit options are provided with links to each of the seven transit providers. Phase II would be the development of a new website for the three fixed-route transit providers in which each of the three agencies would have access to the site and be able to make appropriate updates as needed. This website would also have direct links to the remaining transit providers. For both phases the new umbrella logo and color scheme would be used.

4. Coordinated Customer Service The Committee recommends one coordinated customer service effort with one phone number for the three fixed-route providers and that calls for Amtrak be transferred directly to Amtrak s customer service and the same for Casco Bay Lines. It was also recommended that the service be available daily from 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. and that a back-up automated system be implemented. Questions for the paratransit services should be attempted to be answered and if this isn t possible transferred to RTP and YYCAC. The draft Branding and Marketing Plan has been presented to the Transit Operations Working Group and the PACTS Transit Committee and in the process of being presented to each of the transit providers that signed the MOU to obtain formal endorsement. Representatives from GPCOG will make a presentation to the City Council. City Manager

Final Branding and Marketing Plan for Public Transit in the Greater Portland Region July 11, 2013 Introduction The Branding and Marketing Plan is the result of work by the Branding and Marketing Committee appointed by the Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System (PACTS) Transit Committee associated with the implementation of the Regional Branding and Marketing project. The Regional Branding and Marketing project is one of several coordinated efforts of the PACTS Transit Committee to improve the quality of transit services for customers, better coordinate planning, marketing and coordinate the format of delivery of information to the customer or rider of public transit. The Regional Branding and Marketing project explores common branding opportunities in order to aid customers in identifying transit options across providers in the Greater Portland Region. The planning and staff time for this Project is funded under the Federal Transit Administration s 5303 Transit Planning Program and budget beginning in FY 2012 and continues through FY 2014. This project was staffed by GPCOG/PACTS. The following six transit providers signed an MOU in June of 2012 agreeing to participate in this project and to use existing annual operating revenue to implement recommendations over a period of time. These six transit operators include: Casco Bay Island Transit District (CBITD) Partner Agency Greater Portland Transit District (METRO) - Partner Agency City of South Portland and its Bus Service (SPBS) - Partner Agency Biddeford-Saco Old Orchard Beach (BSOOB) ShuttleBus/Zoom - Partner Agency York County Community Action Corporation (YCCAC) - Partner Agency Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority (NNEPRA) Supporting Partner Agency Members of the Branding and Marketing Committee were appointed by their respective agencies and include the following: Caity Gildart, Sales Director, CBITD Natalie Allen, Marketing Director, NNEPRA Michelle Wilson, Consultant, YYCAC Greg Tansley, Chair, Transit Committee, BSOOB and ShuttleBus/Zoom Rick Sargent, Operations Executive, SPBS Denise Beck, Director of Marketing, Portland METRO 1

This Draft Plan contains recommendations of the Branding and Marketing Committee to the PACTS Transit Committee for consideration in implementing the Branding and Marketing project. Background The Branding and Marketing Committee, led by GPCOG staff met several times between November of 2012 and April of 2013. The issues that were discussed included branding and marketing concepts in general, a review of existing passenger service information in the Greater Portland Region, a review of existing logos and marketing efforts of other transit providers across the U.S., a conference call with SunTrans Transit Agency in Tucson, AZ to hear about their branding and marketing efforts and a Customer Research Initiative that included two successful focus groups held in Portland and an on-line survey (see attached for results) that was developed in order to gauge riders and non-riders opinions on current branding and marketing efforts of transit providers in the Greater Portland Region. Branding and Marketing Retreat A four-hour Branding and Marketing retreat was held on April 3, 2013 at GPCOG. The Committee discussed the concept of brands in comparison to marketing and agreed that there is currently no one brand for the seven individual transit providers in the Greater Portland Region tying them together in any way. It was agreed that a brand is not a logo but a feeling about a product or service. It was recognized there are strong, stand-alone brands for the Amtrak Downeaster train and Casco Bay Lines but they aren t connected to the fixed-route transit providers or the paratransit services. The need for a unifying brand was evident. The Committee discussed and reviewed the strengths and weaknesses of the current transit system in the Greater Portland Region and acknowledged that they can help shape and grow the brand in the future. (It was also noted that it would be helpful to know about current consolidation efforts underway known as the Southern Maine Regional Transit (SMART) Initiative before a brand is developed.) Brand development will come in two phases. The first phase includes acknowledging the positive values and assets that the providers currently possess. These include: Many transit options in the region Serving and connecting with multiple regions It is possible to get around without a car in the region Transit service is safe for individuals and the vehicles are safe Transit vehicles and vessels are clean Public transit in the region is affordable and saves people money Transit providers in the region have friendly staff Riding public transit in the region is environmentally friendly Public transit allows riders to avoid the hassle and stress of driving and provides a relaxing environment Amenities such as bicycle racks are provided on transit in the region 2

Phase II will need to focus on what the current gaps and needs are in the public transit system. The following gaps were identified and it was agreed that they must be improved in order to have a believable and successful brand. Reliable service Modern technologies Frequency of service Route connectivity Simplified fares and electronic ticketing User education Recommendations The Branding and Marketing Committee discussed and agreed on the following recommendations for implementation of the Branding and Marketing project. These recommendations apply to the six transit providers who signed the MOU. It is hoped that the seventh provider, Regional Transportation Program (RTP), will implement these recommendations at some time in the future. The recommendations include: 1. Regional Transit Logo The Committee recommends developing one umbrella logo to be used in a variety of ways including all promotional materials, transit guides, web information, etc. by all of the providers in order to tie the services together. This logo is not to supersede each providers existing individual logo. It was acknowledged that the train and ferries cannot put the logo on their vehicles and vessels, but they can use it in a variety of ways including kiosks in the lobbies of their waiting rooms. There are a few ideas for the development of the logo. One is to sponsor a design contest, the other is to hire a consultant to develop a logo that includes a graphical representation of each of the providers into one logo. 2. Color Scheme The Committee recommends adopting one color scheme to be used in all promotional materials, transit guides, web information, bulletin boards, etc., and using that color scheme for the three fixed-route providers busses, phased in over time. It also recommends keeping the front of all the busses free of advertising so that the front of each bus and vehicle looks similar and can be identified by the rider as such. It was recommended that the Committee work with a designer to come up with color scheme as different colors construe different messages. 3. Website The Committee recommends one coordinated website for use by the three fixedroute bus providers. It was recommended that this be implemented in two phases. The first phase would create a splash webpage in which an overview of all transit options are 3

provided with links to each of the seven transit providers. Phase II would be the development of a new website for the three fixed-route transit providers in which each of the three agencies would have access to the site and be able to make appropriate updates as needed. This website would also have direct links to the remaining transit providers. For both phases the new umbrella logo and color scheme would be used. 4. Coordinated Customer Service The Committee recommends one coordinated customer service effort with one phone number for the three fixed-route providers and that calls for Amtrak be transferred directly to Amtrak s customer service and the same for Casco Bay Lines. It was also recommended that the service be available daily from 5 a.m. to 11 p.m. and that a back-up automated system be implemented. Questions for the paratransit services should be attempted to be answered and if this isn t possible transferred to RTP and YYCAC. It was discussed and agreed that overall, any and all of the recommendations that are adopted must be used consistently and by all participant transit providers in order to be successful. Additional discussion by the Transit Operators and the Transit Committee will be necessary in order to agree on the best ways to pursue implementation of these recommendations and when. Conclusion The Branding and Marketing Plan is the result of over a year of negotiations, discussion and work focused on one bottom line, improving the quality of service for the rider. Service will be improved by coordinating and tying together seven different transit services with different goals into one coordinated system as much as possible. The Branding and Marketing project will continue to coordinate with the Regional Sign and Shelter project in the design of new signs and shelters to ensure compatibility with a new logo, color scheme, etc. The Branding and Marketing Committee submits this report and the above four recommendations to the Transit Operations Working Group and the PACTS Transit Committee for their approval and implementation with the hope that these changes will be made as soon as possible. Remaining Branding and Marketing Work Plan Schedule Present Draft Branding and Marketing Plan to the Transit Operations Working Group 6/21/13 completed Present Draft Branding and Marketing Plan to the PACTS Transit Committee 7/11/13 - completed 4

Present/submit Draft Branding and Marketing Plan to each Providers Board of Directors in order to obtain formal endorsement 10/2/13 Continue to communicate with the Providers Board of Directors on an on-going basis and secure approval for implementing the Plan s recommendations On-going Branding and Marketing Plan Implementation Schedule The Branding and Marketing Committee will continue to work on implementing the following recommendations in the following order: Develop a splash webpage of all transit services in the Greater Portland Region Develop a color scheme to be used in all transit promotional materials, web information, etc. Develop a regional transit logo Begin incorporating the regional transit logo into promotional materials, transit guides, web information etc. as they are updated or changed Create and launch a new website for the three fixed-route transit providers Begin incorporating the new color scheme on the fixed-route service buses Launch coordinated customer service call center 5