Chesapeake Bay Report Card 2016

Similar documents
Chesapeake Bay Report Card 2017

2012 Chesapeake Bay Report Card

Improved health of Chesapeake Bay in 2009

Chesapeake Bay. report card

Coastal Bays. report card. The Maryland Coastal Bays Program. Acknowledgements

Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Restoration:

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

Finalizing the Chesapeake Bay Health Index (BHI)

2008 at a glance. Indicators used in the report card. Total nitrogen. Coastal Bays health ranged from poor to good among reporting regions

The Chesapeake Bay Blueprint:

Coastal Bays. report card. Gold stars for partnerships

Coastal Bays. report card. Modeling nutrients, assessing climate vulnerabilities, and promoting environmental justice

BAY BAROMETER. Health and Restoration. in the Chesapeake Watershed

Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement Final draft January 29, 2014

the ability to manage for a stable and among the jurisdictions, and productive crab population and fishery by implement accountable monitoring

Annual Update. Large-Scale Oyster Restoration in Support of the Chesapeake Bay Agreement Oyster Goal. Stephanie Reynolds Westby, NOAA

Fish Habitat Outcome Management Strategy , v.1

Bay Barometer Spotlight on Health and Restoration in the. Chesapeake Bayand its Watershed

Inner Hempstead Harbor Report Card

The Choice is Ours... Let s choose clean water

SCIENCE PRIORITIES OF THE

BACKGROUND. David Everett

Chesapeake Bay Program in Pennsylvania. Karl G. Brown Executive Secretary PA State Conservation Commission

Fishing and Boating: Past, Present, and Restoration Thoughts

The Continued Evolution of Our Chesapeake Bay and Basin Long-term Water Quality Monitoring Program: Growing with Partnerships

Norwalk Harbor Report Card

Lesson Overview 4.5 Aquatic Ecosystems

Guiding the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay: The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership. Keely Clifford U.S. Embassy Paris

Phase III Watershed Implementation Plans

McKenzie Watershed Water Quality Discussion Article

Linking Ecosystem Indicators to Ecosystem Services

Chesapeake Bay Updates. Agricultural Advisory Board June 18, 2014 Andy Zemba Interstate Waters Office

Coastal Bays. report card. Gold stars for partnerships. Black skimmers are dependent on island habit in the Coastal Bays

Little Bay Water Quality Report Card Spring 2014

Osher Course. What Lies Beneath the Inland Bays?

Chesapeake Bay Strategy Goals Framework

How Nutrient Trading Can Help Restore the Chesapeake Bay

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Scientific, Technical Assessment and Reporting (STAR) Team Briefing and Options Paper:

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

2009 Annual Meeting and Scientific Symposium. Monitoring change in multi-pollutant deposition and environmental response: Bridging air and ecosystems

Board of Trustees C/O Carolyn Mitchell, Honors & Awards Coordinator American Society of Landscape Architects 636 Eye St. NW Washington, DC 20001

Fish Habitat Management Strategy Outline

Coastal Ecosystems: Saving Chesapeake Bay. Note the highest pigment concentrations (red) in coastal regions, especially estuaries

THE STATE CHESAPEAKE BAY. A Report to the Citizens of the Bay Region OF THE

The Hypoxic Zone in the Gulf of Mexico

Conservation Authority Watershed Report Cards and the Chesapeake Bay Experience. December 2, 2013 SOSMART

Integrating Air and Water Environmental Management in the Chesapeake Bay Program: An Encouraging Tale

Protecting & Restoring Local Waters and the Chesapeake Bay

A Vision for a Healthy, Productive, and Sustainable Galveston Bay

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of SAV Restoration Approaches in the Chesapeake Bay

Bay Barometer. The Chesapeake Bay watershed is. A Health and Restoration Assessment of the Chesapeake Bay and Watershed in 2009

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2012 JOES LAKE

CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION Save the Bay

Reducing Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Sediment Pollution Progress Update. Jeff Corbin, Senior Advisor to the EPA Administrator

Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Challenges & Opportunities

Nutrient Management Strategy for the International Red River Watershed. Collaborating Across Jurisdictions to Improve Water Quality

NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office Biennial Report to Congress Fiscal Years

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DRAFT CHESAPEAKE BAY TMDL

Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership s Investment in the Chesapeake Monitoring Cooperative: What s Different This Time Around

Portage Lake Hubbard County

Strategy to Accelerate the Protection and Restoration of Submerged Aquatic Vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM BAY BAROMETER HEALTH & RESTORATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

Food Chains, Food Webs, and Bioaccumulation Background

Instructions to Regional Planners

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2012 MISSISSIPPI LAKE

Portage Lake CASS COUNTY

Citizen Science and the Chesapeake Bay Program s Water Quality Monitoring Program

Marel King, Pennsylvania Director Chesapeake Bay Commission

Prioritizing Climate Change Impacts and Action Strategies

2014 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement:

CHESAPEAKE BAY. A Report to the Citizens of the Bay Region CBP/TRS 283/ Health & Restoration Assessment. PART ONE: Ecosystem Health

Sustainable Fisheries GIT: Fish Habitat

What factors affect life in aquatic ecosystems?

Water Quality Standards Attainment

White Lake 2017 Water Quality Report

The Guanabara Bay Report Card. Bill Dennison 29 April 2016

Water Quality Monitoring Stations

The Chesapeake Bay Program Biennial Strategy Review System: A Guide to Your Quarterly Progress Meeting

Water for Virginia Master Naturalists. What are the types What is important to know about: Functions Values Issues

Chapter 4.4. Development of a Water Quality Index for the Maryland Coastal Bays

Eutrophication: Tracing Nutrient Pollution Back to Penns Creek

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2012 CLAYTON LAKE

Quantifying Ecosystem Services of Restored Oyster Reefs

Dead-Zones and Coastal Eutrophication: Case- Study of Chesapeake Bay W. M. Kemp University of Maryland CES Horn Point Laboratory Cambridge, MD

Update on Straits Pond

Lake & Watershed Resource Management Associates P O Box 65; Turner, ME

Chester River. Report Card.

Environmental Flows for the Galveston Bay Estuary. Scott A. Jones Environmental Policy & Outreach Galveston Bay Foundation

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

Long term Target: Restore oyster populations (complete construction/seeding) in 10 tributaries of the Chesapeake Bay by 2025.

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

Preliminary Draft Plan for Development of Nutrient Criteria in Maryland

CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM BAY BAROMETER HEALTH & RESTORATION IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED

State of the Bay 2006

2017 Data Report for Silver Lake, Van Buren County

STATE. of the BAY MARK REGAN

Hadlock Pond, Washington Co., Lake Hadlock Association, Inc.

Phosphorus Goal Setting Process Questions and Answers 2010

The Lower Galveston Bay Watershed: Potential Oil Spill Impacts

STATE OF THE LAKE Environment Report 2009 BUCKSHOT LAKE

Transcription:

hesapeake Bay Report ard 216 University of Maryland enter for Environmental Science

Fun for you and your family Stewardship is defined as the responsible oversight and protection of something considered worth caring for and preserving. In order to feel a sense of stewardship with a resource like hesapeake Bay, people need to connect with it and feel a sense of place. This sense of place that comes from experiencing the hesapeake s waters can lead to a feeling of kinship and a sense of shared responsibility for Bay resources. As a result, people who enjoy the Bay and its rivers through public access sites are more likely to become citizen stewards. Public access in the hesapeake Bay watershed esignation Local Government NY State Government Academic institution Federal government Nonprofit organization Private land Other Expanding public access opportunities for citizens around the hesapeake Bay watershed for activities like boating, fishing, swimming, and viewing is a focus of the hesapeake Bay Program partnership. These public access points provide a fun way for people to connect with nature. Activities such as these strengthen families, build personal connections, boost local, state, and federal economies, and support stewardship of the Bay. PA M WV E VA 8 Km 8 Mi With public access sites throughout the watershed, recreational opportunities in and around hesapeake Bay are varied and numerous. Map and photos by hesapeake Bay Program. Volunteer your time to improve the Bay You can get involved with your local watershed organization or volunteer to do stream sampling in your community. Volunteering is a great way to be a good steward of our Bay. As a volunteer scientist, the data you collect will be incorporated into management decisions about hesapeake Bay and its watershed through the hesapeake Monitoring ooperative. The ooperative is a partnership that provides technical, logistical, and outreach support to incorporate volunteer water quality and macroinvertebrate monitoring data into the hesapeake Bay Program partnership. The ooperative is working with diverse partners to collect and share new and existing water quality data. This is the first effort to integrate volunteer science data into a federal program. heck out chesapeakemonitoringcoop.org. Stream water quality monitoring is fun and educational. Photo by the Alliance for Aquatic Resource Monitoring.

More gains for fish populations Health of Fisheries, 24 216 1 8 SORE (%) 6 4 A striped bass is handled by aptain Pete Ide at Fishing reek in hesapeake Beach, M. Photo by hesapeake Bay Program. Partnering with stakeholders on management 2 ombined Fisheries Index Striped bass Blue crab Bay anchovy 24 25 26 27 28 29 21 211 212 213 214 215 216 YEAR Four indicators of fisheries health showed widespread score improvements in 216. Striped bass, bay anchovy, and blue crab are ecologically, economically, and socially important fish species in hesapeake Bay, and are incorporated into the ombined Fisheries Index. While the Index is variable over time, the 216 score of 9% was a large improvement over the previous year s score of 73%. This is the highest the fisheries score has been since the start of the report card. The Index is an average of all three species scores. Striped bass held steady with a 1% score, while both blue crab and bay anchovy improved. Blue crab scored a 9% and bay anchovy scored an 8%. Fisheries indicators can vary greatly from year to year since these species move throughout the Bay and beyond. Working to better understand forage fish OysterFutures is a National Science Foundation-funded project that is testing an innovative approach for building consensus on oyster management and restoration in the hoptank region by including stakeholders in a collaborative modeling process. Stakeholders, including watermen, agency representatives, and environmental groups participate in meetings to develop management recommendations and work with scientists to create a model that forecasts potential effects of management options on oyster populations, the oyster industry, and water quality. Respectful and positive discussions at workgroup meetings bode well for this collaborative approach, which is designed to develop science-based regulations that meet the needs of multiple stakeholders. Eastern oysters (left) and Atlantic menhaden (right) are commercially important fisheries in the Bay. Photos by hesapeake Bay Program. New research brought together data from eight monitoring programs to better understand predator-prey relationships and the status of forage fish in the hesapeake Bay. Forage Indicators And onsumption Profiles For hesapeake Bay Fishes, a project led by Andre Buchheister and Ed Houde at UMES hesapeake Biological Laboratory, illuminates trends in abundance of key forage groups and patterns of consumption by predators over time. This work builds a foundation of knowledge to assess and understand complex forage relationships in the Bay. Indicators in this paper could be used to inform future management decisions and help set targets for forage species. Support for research like this leads to a healthier Bay, healthier communities, and a thriving economy.

Improving trends continue Bay Health trends Significantly improving Very poor Slightly improving No change Slightly declining Significantly declining - Moderately poor ecosystem health. Overall health declined the most out of all regions, with all indicator scores decreasing or staying the same except for chlorophyll a. Over time, this region has a significantly improving trend. Patapsco and Back s Lower Western Shore (M) Poor ecosystem health. Improvements in Patapsco and total phosphorus and dissolved oxygen Back s offset declines in chlorophyll a. Over time, this region has a significantly improving trend. Lower Western Shore (M) + Moderate ecosystem health. Health remained steady. Improvements in aquatic grasses and water clarity were balanced by declines in benthic community. Over time, this region has a significantly improving trend. Upper Western Shore - Moderate ecosystem health. Health remained steady. While some indicators improved, others declined. Total nitrogen declined the most out of all the regions. Upper Eastern Shore Patuxent Poor ecosystem health. Overall health improved due to + increases in total phosphorus, dissolved oxygen, and Potomac chlorophyll a scores. - hoptank Lower Eastern Shore (Tangier) Potomac Moderately poor ecosystem health. Health remained steady. Improvements in total phosphorus and water clarity were offset by declines in other indicators. Lower Bay B Moderate ecosystem health. Health slightly improved. Aquatic grasses scored the highest in this region. There were also improvements in total phosphorus. Elizabeth York Mid Bay Lower Bay Poor ecosystem health. This region declined from the previous year. Lowest dissolved oxygen and total phosphorus scores of any region. Showed declines in total nitrogen and aquatic grasses scores. + James Moderate ecosystem health. Improvements in chlorophyll a were balanced by declines in aquatic grasses. This region has a significantly improving trend. Moderate ecosystem health. Health remained steady. Improvements in dissolved oxygen, total phosphorus, and aquatic grasses were offset by declines in benthic community. James + + Moderate ecosystem health. Overall health improved due to gains in chlorophyll a and total phosphorus. This region has a significantly improving trend. Mid Bay York Rappahannock Lower Eastern Shore (Tangier) + Rappahannock Moderate ecosystem health. Overall health declined due to decreases in total nitrogen, water clarity, and benthic community scores. hoptank - Upper Eastern Shore Upper Bay + Patuxent Upper Bay Poor ecosystem health. Overall health improved the most out of all regions. There were improvements in total phosphorus, dissolved oxygen, and chlorophyll a. Over time, this region has a significantly improving trend. + 216 hesapeake Bay Health: Upper Western Shore B Moderately good ecosystem health. ontinues to be the highest scoring region, particularly for total nitrogen and total phosphorus. This was the only region where benthic community improved from the previous year. Elizabeth Poor ecosystem health. Health of this region is variable, showing large changes in indicator scores from year to year. This region has a significantly improving trend.

Recent improvements hold steady Water clarity nitrogen Total Very good 1% A issolved oxygen hlorophyll a Total phosphorus Aquatic Bay Health scale community Benthic grasses Very B F poor 8 6 4 2 Moderate The overall score for the hesapeake Bay Health Index for 216 was 54%, compared with 53% in 215. While this is only a slight improvement, it is encouraging to see health remaining steady despite many pressures on the hesapeake Bay and its watershed. Overall Bay health shows no significant change over time (1986 216), neither improving nor declining. Bay-wide, dissolved oxygen continues to be the best-scoring indicator. issolved oxygen scored 9% in 216, an A. Total phosphorus strongly improved, scoring 82%, an A-, which is a positive development considering last year s decline. While the total nitrogen score went down in 216 to 55%, a +, it is still improving in the long term. Water clarity scored 24%, a -; chlorophyll a scored 35%, a +; aquatic grasses scored 39%, a +; all remaining the same as the previous year. Benthic community declined the most since 215, scoring 54%, a. Total phosphorus, total nitrogen, and aquatic grasses all have significantly improving trends. Water clarity and chlorophyll a have significantly declining trends. issolved oxygen and benthic community show no significant change in health over time. Indicators in the hesapeake Bay Report ard There are seven indicators that make up the Bay Health Index for the hesapeake Bay Report ard. Each indicator is compared to scientifically derived thresholds or goals and scored to determine the overall grade. There are fifteen reporting regions (see map in center page) that make up hesapeake Bay, and each indicator is scored by reporting region, and then the reporting regions are weighted by area to calculate the overall Bay Health Index. There are also three fisheries indicators that make up the Fisheries Index; however, this index is not used in the overall Bay Health Index score. hlorophyll a is used as a measure of phytoplankton (microalgae) biomass. High phytoplankton levels lead to reduced water clarity and decomposing phytoplankton result in reduced dissolved oxygen levels. Water clarity is a measure of how much light penetrates though the water column. Water clarity plays an important role in determining aquatic grasses and phytoplankton distribution and abundance. Aquatic grasses, or submerged aquatic vegetation, are one of the most important habitats in hesapeake Bay. They provide critical habitat to key species such as blue crab and striped bass, and can improve water clarity. issolved oxygen is critical to the survival of hesapeake Bay s aquatic life. The amount of dissolved oxygen needed before aquatic organisms are stressed, or even die, varies from species to species. Total phosphorus is an indicator of excess phosphorus in the Bay. Too much phosphorus can lead to algae blooms, which cause poor dissolved oxygen conditions and stresses Bay organisms. Benthic community, or the Benthic Index of Biotic Integrity, measures the condition of the benthic community living in or on the bottom areas of the Bay. These organisms are a key food source for fish species. Total nitrogen is an indicator of excess nitrogen in the Bay. Too much nitrogen can lead to algae blooms, which cause poor dissolved oxygen conditions and stresses Bay organisms. For more information, visit chesapeakebay.ecoreportcard.org Striped bass, bay anchovy, and blue crab make up the ombined Fisheries Index, which is not included in the Bay Health score. Bay anchovy is one of the most abundant schooling fish species in the Bay, providing an important food source for top predators. Striped bass are key top predators, and use the Bay as an important spawning and nursery area. Blue crabs are both predator and prey in the Bay s food web and use aquatic grasses as habitat.

Partnerships work to keep the Bay thriving Actions are underway to protect and restore the water, habitats, and animals throughout the hesapeake Bay watershed. These actions are being led by local, state, and federal governments, nonprofit organizations, academic institutions, private businesses, and individual citizens. Strong collaborations and sharing of resources among these groups maximizes the effectiveness of their work. Partnerships are essential to optimize the valuable work occurring throughout the Bay. One way in which unique partnerships are protecting the Bay is through land conservation. There are currently 8.8 million acres of protected lands throughout the watershed. They have been protected through unique partnerships such as the hesapeake onservation Partnership (chesapeakeconservation.org). This regional coalition of over 5 organizations is guiding land conservation by bridging the connection between ecological, cultural, and recreational resources. Key leads are the hesapeake onservancy and the National Park Service hesapeake Bay Office. NY PA Land owner Federal State M WV Interstate partnerships are also positively influencing the Bay. Maryland and Virginia collaborate on innovative technologies and share knowledge about oyster conservation. Oysters support the economy, the environment, and our cultural heritage. But overharvesting, disease, and pollution have all impacted oyster populations. Restoring and sustaining the populations into the future is essential to the success of all Bay restoration efforts. Maryland, Virginia, federal agencies, and nonprofits have restored significant numbers of oysters in tributaries in both Maryland and Virginia. Local Non-Governmental Organization Private Other E VA 8 Km 8 Mi Map: Protected lands in the hesapeake Bay watershed. Map provided by the hesapeake Bay Program. Photos left to right: Butch Walters of eal Island, M, harvests oysters in the waters north of eal Island. The Florence Shelly Preserve in Susquehanna ounty, PA is owned by the Nature onservancy and features forest, fields, a stream, and glacial pond surrounded by a floating bog. Photos by hesapeake Bay Program. About the hesapeake Bay Report ard This report card was produced and released in May 217 by the Integration & Application Network, University of Maryland enter for Environmental Science to provide a transparent, timely, and geographically detailed assessment of hesapeake Bay. The data and methods underpinning this report card represent the collective effort of many individuals and organizations working within the hesapeake Bay scientific and management community. The following organizations contributed significantly to the development of the report card: hesapeake Bay Program, University of Maryland enter for Environmental Science, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Maryland epartment of Natural Resources, Virginia epartment of Environmental Quality, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Versar Incorporated, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Maryland epartment of the Environment, Interstate ommission on the Potomac Basin, Old ominion University, Morgan State University, and U.S. Geological Survey. All photographs by Will Parson/hesapeake Bay Program unless specified otherwise. Reference: Stewardship. ictionary.com. ictionary.com Unabridged. chesapeakebay.ecoreportcard.org Random House, Inc. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/stewardship (accessed: April 26, 217)