RIPARIAN FOREST BUFFER

Similar documents
NRCS Programs and Practices for Riparian Areas in Hawaii

Appendix E : Guidelines for Riparian Buffer Areas

Riparian Buffer Requirements. Department of Environmental Protection Bureau of Watershed Management

Maintaining Riparian Areas and Wetlands

Role of Woody Species in (Riparian) Buffer Plantings

Funding Guidelines State Fiscal Year 2016

Conservation Practices for Water Quality: Sediment & Nutrient Control. Trap Sediments/Trap Nutrients on the Field. Improve Soil Health.

Site Condition Evaluation & Environmental Benefits Report

CHAPTER 1. Ecological Integrity

Minnetonka Code of Ordinances

MISSOULA CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2018 COST-SHARE APPLICATION

STANDARDS FOR HEALTHY PUBLIC RANGELANDS

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan. What will you do with your woodland? Some landowners choose to let nature take its course.

Chapter 1: Preparing a Woodland Stewardship Plan

Vegetative Buffer Regulations to Protect Water quality

Riparian Buffers for Water Resource Protection

Proposed Wildlife Habitat Restoration Project At Walking Iron Wildlife Area August 6, 2015

WISCONSIN FOREST MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES

SPRING 18 Seedlings TREE PROGRAM

14. Sustainable Forestry Principals

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Agricultural/Rural Riparian Buffer Analysis

Don t Mow. Let it Grow!

Gray s Creek. Gray s Creek

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

CITY OF NEW WESTMINSTER. Bylaw No. 7033, 2005 RIPARIAN AREAS PROTECTION BYLAW

Forensic Forestry Reading the Land

Scientific Literature Review of Forest Management Effects on Riparian Functions for Anadromous Salmonids

Voluntary Water Quality Conservation Plan

CATEGORY a protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biodiversity.

SECTION 10: WETLANDS PROTECTION

2017 Agricultural Water Quality Workshop

RIPARIAN AREAS REGULATION

Wildlife Habitat & Forest Resource Management Plan. Hickory Hills Park and Casey s Paha

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

Discovering Profits in Unlikely Places: Agroforestry Opportunities for Added Income

Wetland Resources Cultural, Historical and Environmental Significance

THE WATERSHED The watershed is an area of land that drains into a stream. This includes both the surface runoff and groundwater. Because a stream is m

CHECKLIST FORM FOR ASSESSING GRAZING OPERATIONS

Project Started in 1990 on the Ron Risdal Farm. Ron Risdal

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Stream & Floodplain Management. Glossary

PROSPECTUS. Proposed Beech River Canal Wetland and Stream Mitigation Bank

USC BMP Definitions - Agricultural Best Management Practices (including NEIEN Code Id)

Streamflow and Vegetation Response to the Removal of Tamarisk in Riparian Zones; An Example of the Canadian River JASPER BRUSUELAS

Anne Hairston-Strang MD DNR Forest Service September 7, 2017

How is Water Quality Affected by Land Use?

TOWN OF SMYRNA Water Quality Buffer Zone Policy

Title 92 ROADSIDE VEGETATION MANAGEMENT POLICY

orking Trees for Water Quality

Cover it up! Using plants to control buckthorn

SR 161: Jovita Boulevard to South 360th St. Stage 2 / WSDOT Stream Buffer Mitigation (Agreement Y-9403) 2012 Final Monitoring Report

FOREST MANAGEMENT PLAN For the GLADDEN MEMORIAL WOODLAND

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

Water Resource Protection. Today s Presentation

3 Baseline and Existing Conditions

Richard Wolkowski, Extension Soil Scientist Department of Soil Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison

ANCR INDIVIDUAL RESPONSES SUMMARY: 2/11/04 WATER RESOURCES GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

ALABAMA S BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. Protection of Water Quality During Timber Harvesting

* For applicants utilizing bank for compensatory mitigation requirements, information below is not applicable.

15A NCAC 02B.0238 NEUSE RIVER BASIN-NUTRIENT SENSITIVE WATERS MANAGEMENT STRATEGY: AGRICULTURAL NITROGEN REDUCTION STRATEGY The following

The Value of Buffers

Chapter 5: Water Quality Buffer Requirements

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: GRAZING MANAGEMENT

awetlands aprairie aforests ahabitat for Fish, Game & Wildlife

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT

Logan River at Rendezvous Park, Channel and Floodplain Restoration: Crack Willow (Salix fragilis) Issues and Management Strategies

Chapter 10 Natural Environment

Principles of Forest Ecology and Management. Forensic Forestry Reading the Land. Jonathan Kays University of Maryland Extension

Overland Park, KS Stream Riparian Corridor Quality Evaluation

Role of Soils in Water Quality. Mike Marshall Extension Associate Texas A&M-Institute of Renewable Natural Resources

National Management Measures to Protect and Restore Wetlands and Riparian Areas for the Abatement of Nonpoint Source Pollution

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DES PLAINES RIVER WATERSHED-BASED PLAN WHY A WATERSHED-BASED PLAN? WHAT IS A WATERSHED?

General Riparian Vegetation Concepts. General Riparian Vegetation Concepts WHY?

Mixed Conifer Working Group Meeting April 15, 2011 Water and Soil Resource Management Considerations

Forest Restoration and Management in a Changing Climate: Implications for North Shore Watersheds

Chapter 13: Wildlife and Vegetation

The Science Behind Forest Riparian Protection in the Pacific Northwest States By George Ice, Summer 2004

Ecology, Restoration, and Management of Hawaiian Stream and Riparian Systems

Alabama s Best Management Practices

Compensatory Mitigation Plan Requirements For Permittee Responsible Mitigation Projects St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers May 2010

A Review of Landscape and Riparian Disturbances to Stream Ecosystems with emphasis on the North Shore of Lake Superior

Disturbance Driven Dynamics in Riparian Zones:

Compartment Review Presentation

A program of the WSMD within the ANR. Determines the condition of Vermont s wetlands

3.6 Riparian Ecosystem Wildlife

2017 MB Envirothon. Theme Training Document

No. 6 December, Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality Forest Roads

Wetland restoration and monitoring on the Chevelon Wildlife Area

Production and Conservation Trade-off (PaCT) assessment tool

Riparian Setback- What is that and what should I be doing? October 25th, 2016 Presented by: Anil Tangirala, PE, CFM, ENV SP

WATER AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS

Reservoir age, increasing human population,

PERMIT APPLICATION FEES Fees must be paid at time of application

ELK RAPIDS TOWNSHIP WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Stream Corridor Protection and Adaptive Management Manual. Prepared for the City of Independence, Missouri

TYPICAL CONTENTS OF A SITE-SPECIFIC NATURAL RESOURCE AND WOODLAND STAND DELINEATION MAP:

CONSERVATION RESERVE ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (CREP) SUMMARY OF THE WISCONSIN S PROJECT

Transcription:

RIPARIAN FOREST BUFFER (Acres) Code 391 Natural Resources Conservation Service Conservation Practice Standard I. Definition An area predominantly of trees and shrubs that functions as a vegetated ecotone 1 and is located adjacent to and up-gradient of water bodies and water courses. II. Purposes Provide shade to lower water temperatures and facilitate higher stream dissolved oxygen concentrations to improve habitat for aquatic organisms. Provide a source of detritus and large woody cover for aquatic organisms. Improve water quality by establishing permanent tree and herbaceous cover in floodplain areas subject to out-of-bank flow and/or scour erosion. Provide habitat and corridors for aquatic and terrestrial flora and fauna. Increase transpiration and infiltration, resulting in slower groundwater discharge to streams and reduced flood flows and to mitigate flood damage. Restore riparian plant communities. Improve water quality by reducing amounts of sediment, organic matter, nutrients, pesticides, and other pollutants in surface runoff and reducing the amounts of nutrients and other chemicals in shallow groundwater. Reduce pesticide drift entering the water body. Increase carbon storage in plant biomass and soils. III. Conditions Where Practice Applies This practice applies to areas adjacent to permanent or intermittent streams, drainage ditches, wetlands, and lakes where it is desired to have woody vegetation for the improvement of water quality and riparian stability, and to improve fish and wildlife habitat. This practice does not apply to the treatment of conditions where high levels of pollutants can be anticipated such as animal feed lots, feed storage areas, and milking center waste areas. For these types of situations refer to Wisconsin NRCS Field Office Technical Guide, Section IV (WI FOTG), Conservation Practice Standard 635, Wastewater Treatment Strip. This practice does not apply where soil loss is above T within 300 feet of the riparian forest buffer. Where the primary purpose is to protect environmentally sensitive areas such as sinkholes, crevices, or springs, refer to WI FOTG Standards 393, Filter Strip; 342, Critical Area Planting; or other applicable technical standards. IV. Federal, Tribal, State and Local Laws Installation and maintenance of forest buffers shall comply with all federal, tribal, state, and local laws, rules, or regulations. The operator is responsible for securing required permits. This standard does not contain text of any federal, tribal, state, or local laws. V. Criteria A. Establishment. 1. Forest buffers shall be established according to FOTG Standard 612, Tree Planting. Under certain habitat conditions, tree planting density may be as described in Section VI.A. 2. Recommended species are found in Table 1. Other appropriate Wisconsin native species can also be used. Invasive species shall not be included in any planting. 3. State listed noxious weeds and invasive plants shall be controlled during establishment, if present. Conservation Practice Standards are reviewed periodically and updated if needed. To obtain the current version of this standard, download it from the electronic Field Office Technical Guide, or contact the NRCS State Office or the Wisconsin Land and Water Conservation Association office at (608) 441-2677. 1 Words in the standard that are shown in italics are described in X. Definitions. The words are italicized the first time they are used in the text.

391-2 4. Weeds will be controlled until the trees and shrubs are established. B. The starting point for measuring minimum forest buffer widths for the following landscape features shall be as follows. 1. Lakes. Forest buffers shall be measured from the ordinary high water mark (OHWM). 2. Perennial and intermittent streams and drainage ditches. Forest buffer strips shall be measured from the top of the bank if apparent. If banks are not apparent, measurement shall start 10 feet from the center of the channel. Each side of the stream shall be evaluated independently. 3. Existing tree and shrub corridors. Existing tree and shrub corridors shall be included as part of the measured forest buffer width. 4. Wetlands. Forest buffers shall be measured from the upland-wetland interface. C. Forest buffer zones (see Figure 1). 1. No-harvest zone (Zone 1). The no-harvest zone is a minimum of 15 feet in width on the down-gradient edge of the forest buffer and accomplishes the following: Provide shade to moderate and stabilize water temperature Contribute necessary detritus and large woody cover to the aquatic ecosystem Management of Zone 1 will be limited to bank stabilization and removal of potential problem vegetation. Removal of trees may be permitted on a case-by-case basis where habitat and water quality values are not compromised. 2. Sustainable management zone (Zone 2). With the exception of the no-harvest zone, sustainable timber management is permitted in accordance with the Wisconsin Forestry Best Management Practices, such that the original purpose of the forest buffer is not compromised by loss of vegetation or disturbance. Zone 2 will begin at the edge and upgradient of zone 1 and extend a minimum distance of 20 feet. The minimum combined width of Zones 1 and 2 is the lesser of 100 feet or 30 percent of the geomorphic flood plain. In no case will the combined widths of Zones 1 and 2 be less than 35 feet. See Figure 2. 3. Upgradient grass-forb zone (Zone 3). A grass/forb buffer (Zone 3) can be used to control soil movement in the upgradient area immediately adjacent to Zone 2. (See Figure 1.) Concentrated flow and sheet and rill erosion will be controlled within 300' up gradient of the buffer. The minimum width for Zone 3 is 20 feet. Seeding should be done according to WI FOTG Standard 393, Filter Strip, and is in addition to the forest buffer width. D. Areas of concentrated flow in the contributing drainage area shall be evaluated and treated. Where it is important to keep stable grass channels, trees should be kept back 50 feet from the grassed channel bank. E. When soil disturbance is necessary due to streambank or gully repair, the appropriate action shall be taken to limit the disturbance and protect and replant all disturbed areas. F. Grazing shall not be permitted in the forest buffer. G. Areas below the ordinary high water mark shall not be disturbed. This does not preclude practices intended for bank stabilization or stream crossings. H. Land below the downgradient edge of the forest buffer shall be maintained in vegetative cover adequate to prevent sediment delivery. VI. Considerations Additional recommendations relating to design which may enhance the use of, or avoid problems with, this practice but are not required to ensure its basic conservation function are as follows. A. Consult with your local resource manager to determine if particular habitat management concerns exist. For example, consider using WI FOTG Standard 393, Filter Strip immediately adjacent to spring creek coldwater streams located in the Driftless Area. In this case, if WI FOTG Standard 391 is used, trees should be

391-3 planted at a minimum spacing of 18-20 feet in the first 50 feet adjacent to the stream so that a dense canopy does not develop and a grass understory can be maintained. Where prairie or savanna remnants occur on the site, the minimum 18-20 feet spacing can be maintained in the entire Zones 1 and 2. B. Consider using this practice to enhance the conservation of declining species of wildlife, including those that are threatened or endangered. Consider ecological factors such as promoting forested corridors to maximize benefits for wildlife and habitat. C. Consider extending the buffer width to include the entire floodplain. D. Consider marking forest buffer boundaries in an identifiable manner until established. E. Consider locations of vehicle and/or livestock crossings. Refer to WI FOTG Standard 560, Access Road. VII. Plans and Specifications Plans and specifications for the forest buffer shall be in keeping with this standard and shall describe the requirements for applying the practice to achieve its intended purpose. Based on this standard, plans and specifications shall be prepared for each specific field site where a forest buffer will be installed. A plan includes information about the location, construction sequence, vegetation establishment, and operation and maintenance requirements. Plan specifications will include the following. A. Dimensions of the forest buffer to accomplish the planned purpose. B. Species selection, planting rates, and spacing to accomplish the planned purpose. C. Planting dates, care, and handling of the seedlings to ensure that planted materials have an acceptable rate of survival. D. Site preparation sufficient to establish and grow selected species. VIII. Operation and Maintenance A. Avoid damage to forest buffer vegetation from herbicide application to nearby fields. B. State listed noxious weeds shall be controlled. Control of non-native invasive plants is encouraged. C. Vehicular traffic shall be excluded except as necessary for establishment and maintenance activities. D. Operation and maintenance activities should be conducted in accordance with Wisconsin Forestry Best Management Practices. IX. References Castelle, A. J., A. W. Johnson, and C Conolly. 1994. Wetland and stream buffer size requirements - a review. Environ. Qual. 23:878-882. Iowa State University, University Extension. 1996. Stewards of Our Streams, Buffer Strip Design, Establishment, and Maintenance. Pm-1626b. Machtans, C.S., M.A. Villard, and S.J. Hannon. 1996. Use of Riparian Buffer Strips as Movement Corridors by Forest Birds. Conservation Biology 10(5): 1366-1379. National Council for Air and Stream Improvement. 2000. Riparian Vegetation Effectiveness. Technical Bulletin No. 799. Stauffer, J.C., R.M. Goldstein, and R.M. Newman. 2000. Relationship of Wooded Riparian Zones and Runoff Potential to Fish Community Composition in Agricultural Streams. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 57: 307-316. Sweeney, B.W. 1992. Streamside Forests and the Physical, Chemical, and Trophic Characteristics of Piedmont Streams in Eastern North America. Wat. Sci. Tech. 26 (12): 2653-2673. USDA, NRCS Wisconsin Field Office Technical Guide (FOTG), Section IV, Practice Standards and Specifications. Wang, L., J. Lyons, P. Kanehl, and R. Gatti. 1997. Influences of Watershed Land Use on Habitat Quality and Biotic Integrity in Wisconsin Streams. Fisheries 22(6): 6-12.

391-4 Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 1995. Wisconsin s Forestry Best Management Practices for Water Quality. Bureau of Forestry, Pub-FR-093 95. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 1997. Wisconsin Manual of Control Recommendations for Ecologically Invasive Plants. Madison, WI: Bureau of Endangered Resources. X. Definitions Control (VIII.B.) - To destroy the above-ground portion of a noxious weed in a manner and at the proper time to prevent the development and distribution of viable seeds or other propagules and their spread from one area to another. For species which reproduce vegetatively, control includes the use of methods which help contain or reduce the vegetative spread of the weed. Ecotone (I.) The boundary between adjacent ecosystem types. An ecotone can include environmental conditions that are common to both neighboring ecosystems and can have higher species diversity. Geomorphic flood plain (V.C.2.) - Geomorphic Floodplain is the flat area adjoining a river channel constructed by the river in the present climate and overflowed at times of high discharge. Ordinary high water mark (V.B.1.) - The ordinary high water mark (OHWM) is the point on the bank or shore where the water is present often enough so that the lake or stream bed begins to look different from the upland. Specifically, the OHWM is the point on the bank or shore up to which the water, by its presence, wave action, or flow, leaves a distinct mark on the shore or bank. The mark may be indicated by erosion, destruction of or change in vegetation, or other easily recognizable characteristics. The OHWM can be located through on-site studies of physical and biological conditions at the shoreline. The principal indicator is the change from water plants to land plants. In the area where the plants change, the investigator may also use indicators such as change in soil type, ridges, or other erosion marks or water stains on rocks, soils, trees, or structures. If none of these indicators are available in the immediate location, the elevation of the OHWM may be found at another spot and transferred to that site in question. T (III.) Soil loss tolerance. It is the average annual erosion rate that can occur with little or no long-term degradation of the soil resource on the field. Soil loss tolerance values are assigned to each soil map unit. Invasive plants (V.A.3.) - Having the ability to significantly displace desirable vegetation in landscapes or to reduce yield of growing crops. Noxious weed (V.A.3.) - An aquatic or terrestrial herbaceous or woody plant that is legally designated as being invasive and persistent, and is injurious to human values such as public health, the environment, livestock, growing crops, natural areas, or other lands.

391-5 Table 1 Example Species Somewhat Poorly or Poorly Drained Soils Trees Other Soils Green Ash Red Maple Silver Maple Eastern Cottonwood Black Willow Swamp White Oak Black Spruce Tamarack Northern White Cedar Black Ash Red Osier Dogwood Silky Dogwood Highbush Cranberry Elderberry Ninebark Black Chokecherry Speckled (Tag) Alder Shrubs Northern Red Oak White Oak Bur Oak Sugar Maple Shagbark Hickory White Ash Aspen American Basswood Black Walnut White Pine Red Pine White Spruce Gray Dogwood Arrowwood Chokecherry Juneberry Leadplant Nannyberry New Jersey Tea Serviceberry Winterberry Ninebark Wild Plum Thornapple Hazelnut

391-6 Figure 1 Zones for woodland harvest and no harvest. ZONE 1 ZONE 2 ZONE 3 NO-HARVEST AREA, 15 MIN. WIDTH SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT ZONE UPGRADIENT GRASS-FORB ZONE Figure 2 Examples of minimum riparian forest filter strip widths. Upland Terrace or upland Filter strip width (zones 1 and 2) equals a minimum of 60 feet flood plain side. Calculation: 200 feet x 0.30 = 60 feet Filter strip width (zones 1 and 2) equals a minimum of 35 feet. Geomorphic flood plain 200 feet Channel (showing bankful high water