Activities of the Korean Association of the Institutions Review Boards (KAIRB) in the year of Korea

Similar documents
Challenges to Quality. Aphornpirom Ketupanya,M.D.

Global Clinical Trials in Korea

Defining research compliance Protocol review committees Conflicts of interest Export Controls

IOI PROPERTIES GROUP BERHAD (Company No A) AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

The 6 th Kitasato-Harvard Symposium Session3:New Challenges Disease Areas. Investigator Initiated Trial (IIT) Future for IIT from the past experience

1 The Clinical Research Coordinator (CRC)... 1

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Bulgaria

IOI CORPORATION BERHAD (Company No W) AUDIT AND RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) Principles for voluntary codes of business ethics

Japan Radiological Society Guidelines on Management of Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research. I. Purpose of formulation of guidelines

US FDA and International Regulatory Efforts in Cellular and Gene Therapies

Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight (ESCRO) Committee. Policies and Procedures

Title: IRB Purpose, Principles and Responsibilities Page: 1 of 5

Ethics Committees/IRBs Today: Challenges for Efficiency and Quality

Human Research Protection Program Policy

2010/SOM3/LSIF/006 APEC Harmonization Center - Update on Progress and Prospects for Future Work

The EFGCP Report on The Procedure for the Ethical Review of Protocols for Clinical Research Projects in Europe (Update: April 2011) Ireland

Human Research Participant Protection Program Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Clinical trial applications in the EU and US

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Use of IRB Quality Metrics for Performance Assurance of the Ethics Committee

Board Charter. 1. Board Composition and Chairman. 2. Roles and Responsibilities of the Board

FERCAP Conference An International Conference on Developing Leadership in Ethical Health Research Towards Good Practices and Integrated Systems

UCI ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES & PROCEDURES

Good Clinical Practice Compliance

Biomedical Research on Human Participants

Incorporating FDA Regulatory Thinking into Plans for Medical Devices

UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Contents APEC Harmonization Center(AHC)

INSPECTION OF INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEES (IEC) The Italian Experience

Quality Assurance in Clinical Trials

Outline of Discussion

A notice on the issuance of drug clinical trials, ethical review of the guiding principles

Danish Act on Clinical Trials of Medicinal Products 1

DARTMOUTH COLLEGE BIOLOGICAL SAFETY PROGRAM Institutional Biosafety Committee Subcommittee for Clinical Gene Transfer

Protocol Submission Form

The Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Determination of IND/IDE Requirement

CANCER CENTER SCIENTIFIC REVIEW COMMITTEE

South East Water Corporation Finance Assurance and Risk Management Committee Charter

Stony Brook University Human Stem Cell Research Policy (August 15, 2013 version)

Good Clinical Practice. Martin Rose, MD, JD February 8, 2018 ASQ

2018 Common Rule Implementation Checklist

The Best Companion! KOREA MEDICINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE - CRO Based on Reliability and Promise, KMRI will accompany you

June 15, Adaptive Phase I Studies: The IRB Perspective Marilyn Teal, PharmD IRB Member, Schulman IRB

Corporate Medical Policy

King III Chapter 2 Board Charter. September 2009

Regulatory Perspectives and Clinical Trial Status in Korea

Effective Date: October 8, 2015 Policy Number: MHC_RP0301. Corporate Director, HRPP Institutional Official, HRPP

The Intersection of Genomics Research and the IDE Regulation

Developing a Written Reliance Agreement with a Central IRB

Human Subjects Research Policy Update. Naomi Coll Director of Research Policy and Compliance

Protecting Human Subjects

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

The Foschini Group Limited Remuneration Committee Charter

INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION APPLICATION. IDE Title (if title being used)

1201 Maryland Avenue SW, Suite 900, Washington, DC ,

Sponsor-Investigator Responsibilities In Clinical Trials

Regulatory issues for academicled multinational trials in Asia: Who takes responsibility?

RECs system in Latvia

CAPITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD (THE COMPANY )

MEDICAL DEVICE CLINICAL INVESTIGATIONS AND ISO 14155

Responsibilities of Investigators for Clinical Trials from Consent to Safety Reporting

Guidance on Requirements of the Sponsor and the Investigator as a Sponsor

MANDATE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

March 2, Dear Chairman Upton, Ranking Member Pallone, and Representative DeGette:

Audit Committee Charter

THE BIDVest GROUP LIMITED

Dr. David D. Lee, Provost and VP for Academic Affairs

Corporate Governance Principles

Value of harmonized Nordic ethical evaluation of clinical trials. Mika Scheinin University of Turku, Finland Nordic Trial Alliance, Oslo 30.1.

Ethics Committee Perspective

2013 Metrics on Human Research Protection Program Performance

Review of EU Clinical Trial Directive. 15 May 2012 Mike Beckers Sidley Austin LLP, Brussels

SUBJECT: INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) - HUMANITARIAN USE DEVICES

Syngenta AG Audit Committee Charter CLASSIFICATION: PUBLIC

1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW

ISPE Comments on the CIOMS 2006 draft Special Ethical Considerations for Epidemiologic Research 1

Investigator Conflict of Interest Disclosure Policy for Human Subjects Research

RFID(Radio-Frequency Identification) for SNUH CTC Pharmacy. New Start of SNUH - CMI (Center for Medical Innovation)

On behalf of the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) and the 30,000 people with cystic

Human Research Protection Program Education Plan

Definition of Human Subject (94% oppose, 3% support, 3% support with qualifiers)

Human Subjects Protection: Training for Research Teams

1.4 Applicable Regulatory Requirement(s) Any law(s) and regulation(s) addressing the conduct of clinical trials of investigational products.

IRB-GCP and Timelines. Andrew Majewski, MSc. 1 st DOLF Meeting Washington University School of Medicine St Louis, Missouri-USA October th, 2010

Research: An Essential Component of a Comprehensive MS Center

3. Human Biomedical Research. Defining Human Biomedical Research

HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM PLAN

How did it evolve? o Public disasters, serious fraud and abuse of human rights. o Trials of War criminals-nuremberg code 1949

Research Ethics Committee Administration in Uganda: The Research Ethics Committee (REC) Administrators Perspective

RAVEN RUSSIA LIMITED CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Terms of reference of the Audit Committee

BOTSWANA ACCOUNTANCY OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY (BAOA)

THE GUARDIAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE CHARTER

GCP Basics - refresher

THE AUSTRALIAN WINE CONSUMERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED BOARD CHARTER. Board Charter

People and Safety Committee Charter

The Research Services Organization (RSO) of the Academic Health Center

The Role of the IRB in Clinical Trials: What Patients and Families Need to Know. Marjorie A. Speers, Ph.D. Executive Director, WCG Foundation

GLOBAL VACCINE SAFETY INITIATIVE TERMS OF REFERENCE

Social Consensus and Regulatory Issues in applying Nanoproducts in Korea

Transcription:

Activities of the Korean Association of the Institutions Review Boards (KAIRB) in the year of 2002-2003 Korea October 18, 2003 Ock-Joo Kim, M.D., Ph.D. General Secretary of KAIRB (Seoul, Korea) I. Foundation of KAIRB On September 13, 2001, preparing KAIRB was agreed in principle at a preliminary meeting for the establishment of The Korean Association of IRBs (KAIRB), Attendants of the meetings were representatives of the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS), the Korean Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, and major IRBs in Korea. November 20, 2001, five representatives of KAMS and three from major IRBs formed a taskforce team for organizing the preparations and procedures. On February 25, 2002, Preparatory Committee for KAIRB was established, which were composed of 42 members from universities, health authorities, academic societies, and media. On March 18, 2002, The Korean Association of Institutional Review Boards (KAIRB) was founded and elected officers. II. KAIRB and FERCAP Even before the birth of KAIRB, FERCAP and TDR played an important role in placing KARIB in the international setting and context. On 20-22, 2002 December, WHO TDR organized International Meeting on Research Ethics in China, South Korea and Japan in Nagasaki, Japan. Although it was before the foundation of KAIRB, the Preparatory Committee for the Foundation of KAIRB delegated a member to the meeting to present the forthcoming foundation of KAIRB as a national forum for ethics review committees. From the meeting, the forthcoming KAIRB established international and regional collaboration and found rich resources to develop standard operating procedures for research ethics review including WHO TDR s Operational Guidelines for Research Ethics Review Committees. From then on, KARIB has delegated a representative to FERCAP annual meetings to promote international communications and to build national capacity for ethics review through the FERCAP resources and meetings. KAIRB s participation in FERCAP activities proved to be crucial for building up in-country capacities of ethics review of biomedical research. Utilizing rich resources and information through international communication in the annual meeting of FERCAP 2002, KAIRB made important advancement in research ethics. III. Activities of KAIRB 2002-2003 1. March-April 2002: National survey on IRB operation in Korea The KAIRB performed a survey research on current status of IRBs in Korea. The president of KAIRB (Dr. Shin) published the result. I'll attach the paper and the editorial. 1

2. May 4 th 2002: Symposium on Research Ethics in Korea The KAIRB held a symposium on Research Ethics in Korea at the 30 th Congress of Korean Medical Association (KMA) with following topics: 1) Comparison of KGCP with WHO guidelines 2) Current situations of IRB operations in Korea 3) Future direction of IRB operations About 160 people from IRBs, academia and industries participated in the symposium and active discussion continued during the symposium among the participants. 3. June 19-21, 2002: Korea-NIH conference on ethical and regulatory aspects of human research The KAIRB held an international symposium, co-host with Dept. of Clinical Bioethics, NIH USA. Eleven lecturers were invited from USA, European and African countries. Attendants were more than one hundred IRB members, 64 researchers, 37 from industry, 5 from the government. 4. July 25 27, July 29-August 2, 2002: Attending FERCAP meetings and conference: The KAIRB delegated the Secretary of KAIRB as a representative of the organization to the FERCAP meetings and conference. After participating the meetings, the Secretary reported FERCAP meetings and distributed the new guidelines (the Blue Book) of August 2002. 5. July -September 2002: Conducted Project for Developing Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Introduction of IRB System. Requested by MOST (Ministry of Science & Technology), KAIRB conducted Project for Developing Guidelines for Stem Cell Research and Introduction of IRB System. Through the MOST Project, KAIRB provided the MOST with drafted guidelines and recommendations on stem cell research & IRB operations. 1) Double check systems for the review of stem cell research: (1) local IRB and (2) Special Ethics Committee for stem cell research 2) Set boundaries of stem cell research: ban creation of embryos for research purposes 3) Strongly recommended to establish IRBs at every biomedical research institution (currently IRBs exist mainly in clinical trial hospitals) 6. February 2003: KAIRB published "Guidelines for Establishment and Operation of the IRB in Korea" (the KAIRB, Seoul) Nationwide survey by KAIRB (April 2002) demonstrated that only 30% IRBs reviewed academic researches. Given growing concerns over ethical aspects of biomedical researches such as genomic studies, genetic studies, and stem cell research, the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences released an editorial to urge every research to 2

be reviewed by EC or IRB (February 2003). Stimulated by FERCAP meeting (July 2002) and spurred by the MOST project (Sep. 2002), KAIRB began to work on the Guidelines for Establishing and Operating IRBs in Korea. In October 2002 Draft Guidelines were made based upon international and national guidelines, regulations, and ethics codes. Draft Guidelines were circulated for comment. The comment period ended on December 30, 2002. Comments mainly came from IRB members, KAIRB member societies, scientific societies, governmental bodies, and sponsors. In February 2003 the Steering Committee reviewed comments and finalized Guidelines for Establishing and Operating IRBs (in Korean). Soon after, the Guidelines were distributed to IRBs and research institutes nationwide. Guidelines for Establishment and Operation of the IRB in Korea Table of contents Preamble I. General provisions 1.1 Objective 1.2 Definitions 1.3 Basic principles 1.4 Scope II. Establishing and Constituting an IRB 2.1 Establishing an IRB at a Research Institute 2.2 Constituting an IRB 2.3 Appointment of IRB Members 2.4 Conditions of Appointment 2.5 Duty of IRB Members 2.6 Quorum Requirements III. Submission of an Application 3.1 Application Requirements 3.2 Documentation IV. Review 4.1 Principles of the Review 4.2 Review Process 4.3 Elements of the Review 4.4 Expedited Review 4.5 Continuing Review 4.6 Review of Revised Protocols 4.7 IRB Review and decision-making of the director of Institute 4.8 Review of Multi-center Study 4.9 Review of Protocols for Emergency V. Decision-making 5.1 Conditions for Approval 5.2 Process of IRB Decision-Making 5.3 Suspension or Termination of Approval VI. Communication of a Decision VII. Informed Consent 7.1 General Requirements of Informed Consent 7.2 Written Information Delivered to Research Participants 7.3 Informed Consent in Non-Therapeutic Research 7.4 Exemption and Revision of Informed Consent 7.5 Documentation of Informed Consent 3

VIII. Follow-up 8.1 Communication 8.2 Audit for non-compliance IX. Documentation and Archiving 9.1 Requirements for archiving 9.2 Items of archiving 7. February 2003: KAIRB published Current Status of the IRBs in Korea: Constitution, Operation, and Policy for Protection of Human Research Participants. In August 2002, the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS) requested KAIRB to publish the national survey on IRBs conducted April 2002 by KAIRB. The survey results were published in the Journal of Korean Medical Science (JKMS, Feb, 2003, http://jkms.kams.or.kr) as a special article. Referring to the article, the editorial of JKMS emphasized the importance of capacity building for ethics review and responsibility of researchers to be reviewed by IRBs before publication. 8. May 27-28, 2003: KAIRB published organized biannual workshops to train IRB members-"ethical and Regulatory Aspects in IRB Operations. KAIRB organized the first KAIRB Workshop on Research Ethics and Regulations for IRB Members on May 27-28, 2003. The first day (May 27) program consisted of basic courses for IRB members; the second day (May 28) was allotted as advance courses to deal with more difficult topics. Sponsored by governments (MOST, FDA) academia (KAMS, CPT), and industry (KAPM, KAPI), the Workshop has lecturers mainly from members of the KAIRB Education and Training Subcommittee; government officials from FDA, NIH, MOHW; ELSI of Human Genome Project; and the Ethic Committee of Stem Cell Project. Panelists were researchers, sponsors, governments, and IRB members. Workshop attendants were 138 IRB members and chairpersons of university hospital IRBs, 10 Medical Directors of pharmaceutical industries and CRO, and one traditional medicine hospital. Among all 151 attendants, 122 people came from Cosmopolitan area (Seoul), and 29 from Provinces. KAIRB Workshop for IRB Members: "Ethical and Regulatory Aspects in IRB Operations. Program First day- Basic Course 08:50-09:00 Greetings President of KAIRB/ Commissioner of KFDA 09:00-09:40 Historical development of IRBs and its Significance in Biomedical Research 09:40-10:00 The Trends in IRB Operation : Global Issues 10:00-10:20 In-Country Challenges for IRB Operation 10:40-12:00 Regulation & Policies Update for Clinical Trials 1. Ethical and Regulatory Changes for Clinical Trials - KFDA 2. Current System of Approval and Management of Biological Material - KFDA 3. Regulation of Review of Functional Food Trials - MOHW 12:00-13:10 Lunch 4

13:10-13:50 Sponsor's Perspectives on IRB review 13:50-14:30 Basic IRB Review : Principles 14:30-14:50 Coffee Break 14:50-15:30 Basic IRB Review : Operation and Administration 15:30-16:10 Basic IRB Review : Observational Studies 16:10-16:50 Informed Consent 16:50-17:00 Evaluation Second day- Advanced Course 09:00-09:30 Review for the Researches on Vulnerable Subjects 09:30-10:00 Conflict of Interest and IRB operation 10:00-10:20 Coffee Break 10:20-11:10 Panel Discussion I: Expedited Review 11:10-11:40 Emerging Biotechnology and IRB Review (1) Human Genetic Research 11:40-12:00 Quality assurance program 12:00-13:10 Lunch Meeting for Expert Secretaries 1. Building Network of expert secretaries of IRBs 2. Quality Improvement System: OHRP 3. Plan for Future Cooperation 13:10-13:50 Emerging Biotechnology and IRB Review (2) Human Genomic Research 13:50-14:40 Panel Discussion II: Continuing Review 15:00-15:40 Emerging Biotechnology and IRB Review (3) Stem Cell Research including Fetal Tissue 15:40-16:00 Evaluation 9. May 27, 2003: KAIRB published a Newsletter On May 27, 2003, KAIRB published the first Newsletter with following contents: Contents: (1) Briefing of one or two IRBs; history, constitution, operation, current activities, plans, etc; (2) News pertaining research ethics review; (3) Column: important topics of ethics review; (4) International Education Program for Research Ethics; (5) Activities and plans of the KARIB. Currently KAIRB plans to publish the newsletter biannually. 10. KAIRB Future Plans KAIRB s future plans are as following: 1) Strengthening the Network of Expert Secretaries; 2) Enhancing international collaboration; 3) Providing Workshops to the IRB members in the Provinces; 3) Updates Recent Information on Ethics Review to IRB members; 4) Provide Q&A services utilizing network of expert secretaries; 5) Introduction of QA system. In summary, many activities related to the research ethics review have been done on by KAIRB since its foundation on March 18, 2002. As a whole, the awareness on biomedical research ethics is elevating both in professional groups and in public in 5

Korea. And KAIRB has been, and will be playing an important role in advancing research ethics and research review capacities. 6