Table 6.1: Harvest and Post Harvest Losses (%) of Cereals at National Level

Similar documents
Decadal Shift in Cropping Pattern in Karnataka Research Report July 2016

Sreedhar Patil 5/30/2013

Myanmar Agriculture and Future Prospect of Agricultural Development in Kayah State

Evaluating Policies and Public Investments to Transform Tanzania s Agriculture-Food System

Sunil Jain, Sankarsana Sahoo, Kumar Sundaram, Pramod Kumar

October 11, Impact of India s demonetization on agricultural markets

Trade, Hotels and Restaurants

AGRICULTURE. Agriculture and Crop Production. Genetics, Plant Breeding and Microbiology 15. Livestock Production 5 Scope and Importance

Government of India Ministry of Agriculture Department of Agriculture and Cooperation Directorate of Economics and Statistics

VIII. Price Movements

SOUTH AFRICA - Agricultural Survey Main Results

Growth in area, production and productivity of major crops in Karnataka*

India Organic Food Market Forecast & Opportunities, 2017

Global Status of Commercialized Biotech Crops. International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications

1 What are three cropping seasons of India? Explain any one in brief. 2 Discuss three main impacts of globalization on Indian agriculture.

Identifying Investment Priorities for Malawian Agriculture

Joyce Kinabo Sokoine University of Agriculture Morogoro, Tanzania

REPORT ON AREA, PRODUCTION, PRODUCTIVITY AND PRICES OF AGRICULTURE CROPS IN KARNATAKA

Table 10: U.S. AGRICULTURAL IMPORTS FROM CANADA, 1995 AND 1996

Table 8: U.S. AGRICULTURAL IMPORTS FROM MEXICO, 1995 AND 1996

B. Sc. (Ag.) Hons. Part- II Batch A-- AGRON 4211 Field Crops-I (Kharif) 3(2+1) Name of teacher Dr. L.R.Yadav Lecture schedule :Theory S.No.

Improving methods for estimating post harvest losses

Market opportunities for Queensland agribusiness from FTAs with China, Japan and South Korea. Queensland Production

AGRICULTURE (CODE NO. 01) PAPER - I

Vital Statistics (Part III)

Feed the Future Innovation Lab for Food Security Policy

Agriculture. List of Tables

Focus - Oilseeds & Pulses. Sanjeev Asthana

AGRICULTURAL AND FISH PRODUCTION Year 2001

AREA, PRODUCTION, PRODUCTIVITY

Group 3: Anuradha Rucku Gupta Marvis Dan Xiao Duong Nguyen Van

Horticulture State at a Glance: Manipur, Vol. 1(8), : Value of Output of Horticulture, Fruits and Vegetables and Condiments & Spices

Role of Rural Economy of India

Agricultural Statistics at a Glance 2008

Page 1 of 6. Agriculture. I. Answer the Following

Appendix 3: Association of pesticides with crops and crop types

ijcrr AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CROP DIVERSIFICATION IN TAMIL NADU

13. AGRICULTURE (Code No. 068)

Development of decision support system for land suitability evaluations for crops using ICT tools

Agriculture production trends in SPSR Nellore district of Andhra Pradesh

ÉÃ Á À. PÀ ÁðlPÀ gádåzà

An Economic Evaluation of Climate Change Impact on the Sava River Basin

Annex 3 Methodology of quantification and analysis

agriculture, forestry & fisheries Department: Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

PREFACE. The Publication is prepared in the Agricultural Statistics Division of the Directorate of Economics and Statistics.

Bilateral Agricultural Trade between India and Pakistan: Trend, Compositions and Future Directions

EAT RIGHT FOR YOUR BLOOD TYPE

INDIA - Agricultural Census 2001 & Livestock Census 2003

FP 0653 CROP PROCESSING

DISTRIBUTION OF CROPS AND THEIR REQUIREMENT

ZONAL PROJECT DIRECTORATE, KANPUR

AGRIBUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES

PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE OF SELECTED HORTICULTURAL COMMODITIES IN KARNATAKA Sathyendra Kumar AD* 1, Dr. H. M. Chandrashekar 2

JECAM Guidelines for cropland and crop type definition and field data collection

Minimum Core Data Set

Colusa County Department of Agriculture Crop Report. Harry A. Krug Agricultural Commissioner

CURRENT STATUS OF AGRICULTURAL MARKET INFORMATION SYSTEM IN INDONESIA. Tahlim Sudaryanto Ministry of Agriculture Republic of Indonesia

Pratidhwani the Echo ISSN: (Online) (Print) Impact Factor: 6.28

UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SCIENCES, SHIVAMOGGA. Seed Unit

PRICE INDICES IN AGRICULTURE, THIRD QUARTER OF

Farm Eligibility Table. Fire & Allied. Classification. FL/GL Auto

Socio-psychological Correlates of Tribal Entrepreneurship Development

Global Strategy. Session 1.2: Minimum Set of Core Data Items. Module 1: Sampling in the Context of the Global Minimum Set of Core Data Items

Importance, area, production and productivity of major cereals, pulses, oilseeds, sugar crops, medicinal and aromatics and forage crops

Reducing Post-Harvest Losses in TURKEY 13 OCTOBER 2016 ANKARA

PRICES OF COMMODITY PRODUCTS

MCQ s With Explanation Indian Agriculture

Table 70. Summary by Tenure of Operators: 1998

IMPACTS OF NATIONAL AGROFOOD POLICY TOWARDS AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN MALAYSIA

Research on Post Harvest Technology of Importance Crop of Saurashtra

National Census of Agriculture September 9 November

Virtual Water Consumption and its Relationship to Future Food Security in Singapore

Name of the farmer: Mr.Singaram. Village: Vallakundapuram. Udumalpet Block. Thiruppur District. Mobile Number:

This presentation is sponsored by the Beginning Farmer and Rancher Development Program INTEGRATED FARMS

OVERVIEW OF AGRICULTURAL STATISTICS IN LITHUANIA Legislative and institutional settings

The U.S. Value of Agricultural Production: A Measuring Framework with Implications for WTO Monitoring and Disciplines

Chapter 4 Agriculture

PROCEEDINGS OF THE STATE LEVEL TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON at APCOB, H.O., HYDERABAD

Agricultural Prices. June Prices Received Index Increased 0.1 Percent

Overview of Post Harvest Losses Management Practices in Malawi

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: February 2015 with Comparisons

A brief focus on Georgia s agricultural industry

Developing monthly agricultural export price indexes

Overview of Agriculture in Karnataka and Scope for PPP. Presentation by Commissioner for Agriculture Karnataka State Department of Agriculture

Economic Review. South African Agriculture. of the DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES

Site specific enterprise planning and implementation for developing farming system model

Tradi'onal Agriculture

Nitrogen Mass Flow in China s Animal Production System and Environmental Implications

Protecting Pollinators

Agricultural Regions

Agribusiness Status in India..Issues and Way Forward

08. WATER BUDGETING AND ITS IMPORTANCE - IRRIGATION SCHEDULING - APPROACHES

National Food Security of Sri Lanka: Past,present, stretagies,achivements and challenges

Future Action Plan of Biotechnology in Sri Lanka

Agricultural Prices. October Prices Received Index Down 3.5 Percent

Prices Received, Prices Paid, and Ratio of Prices Received to Prices Paid Indexes 2011 Base United States: December 2018 with Comparisons

AgriStability GUIDE FOR REPORTING PRODUCTIVE UNITS FOR 2013

Agriculture in Bulgaria

Supply, demand, and projected nutritional need for fruits and vegetables

6. Agriculture and Environment. Agriculture Environment Energy and Water

Transcription:

1 Paddy 1.22 ±1.11 2 Wheat 1.69 3 Maize 0.50 4 Bajra 5 Sorghum Table 6.1: Harvest and Post Harvest es (%) of Cereals at National 0.74 ±0.43 0.38 1.13 1.62 ±0.48 1.57 1.30 ±0.82-0.36 ±0.48-0.48 - ±0.30-0.33 ±0.72-0.39 ± 0.04 0.30 0.34 -gg 0.27 ±0.48 Harvestg Threshg Sortg/ Gradg Wnowg/ Cleang/ Gng Dryg 0.07 3.91 4.67 2.81 3.82 2.76 1.93 ±0.88 (0.64 ) 1.53 ±0.63 (0.59 ±) 1.74 ±0.62 (0.41 1.40 ( ) 1.65 ) 0.52 ) 0.29 0.63 ±0.15 1.34 ( 0.72 ( 1.73 ± (0.66 ) 0.65 ±0.34 ( 1.11 (0.66 0.75 ( ) 1.13 ±0.81 ( ) ssg (0.39 ) 1.72 (0.48 ±) ( (0.07 0.58 * 1.28±0.31 1.28 ±0.31 1.29 ±0.31 0.98 1.12 Figures parentheses show contribution of storage % relation to total production * Sum of the loss as % of the total produce from all storage channels (i.e. sum of the figures parentheses) 5.19 5.96 ±0.38 4.10 4.80 3.87 ±0.38

Table 6.2: Harvest and Post Harvest es (%) of Pulses at National 1 Pigeon Pea 0.48 ±1.58 2 Chick Pea 0.72 ±1.14 3 Black Gram 1.13 ±1.79 4 Green Gram 0.86 ±1.28 0.44 ±1.24 1.04 ±1.22 0.62 ±1.12 0.69 ±0.63 0.82 ±0.88 1.62 ±2.84 1.63 Harvestg Threshg Sortg/ Gradg Wnowg/ Cleang/ Gng - 1.04 ±1.23-0.38 ±0.81-0.31-0.32 ±1.02 0.50 0.31 ±1.09 -gg ±0.61 ± Dryg ± 3.43 3.41 ±0.80 4.96 ±1.56 4.09 ±0.97 2.35 (1.36 ) 1.30 ±1.04 (0.31 ±) 1.44 ±1.65 (0.73 ) 2.06 ±2.04 ( ±) 0.20 2.23 ±0.40 ( 0.97 ( ) 0.86 ( ( ) 0.78 0.57 0.70 ±1.62 ) 1.60 (0.8 ssg 1.69 (0.30 0.60 ( ( 0.43 * 1.96 0.86 ± 1.07 ±0.86 1.42 5.39 4.28 ± 6.06 ±1.28 5.51 Figures parentheses show contribution of storage % relation to total production * Sum of the loss as % of the total produce from all storage channels (i.e. sum of the figures parentheses)

1 Mustard 4.54 ±2.11 2 Cottonseed 0.59 ±1.85 3 Soybean 3.14 ±1.02 4 Safflower 5 Sunflower 1.08 6 Groundnut 4.79 ±3.75 Table 6.3: Harvest and Post Harvest es of Oilseeds at National, % 1.09 ±1.17 ±1.12 0.46 0.73 ±2.26 1.78 ±0.92 Harvestg Threshg Sortg/ Gradg Wnowg/ Cleang/ Gng - 0.33 - - 0.86 ±1.13 0.38 ±0.91 1.24 ± 1.06 ±1.87 1.31 2.72 ±1.81-0.49-0.52-0.52 ± - 0.34 ± 0.33 ±0.31 0.31 -gg ±0.55 0.06 ± 0.08 ±0.15 ±0.05 0.20 Dryg 0.06 ± 0.07 ± 8.43 ±1.19 2.19 ±1.31 5.84 ±0.57 3.26 3.93 9.11 ±1.99 0.78 ± 0.57 ( ) ± 0.29 0.83 ± 0.42 ( 0.62 ± 0.79 2.22 ± 0.42 1.61 ± 1.22 ( ) ± 0.09 ± ( - 0.88 ± 0.57 (0.52 ±0.32) ± 0.02 ±0.02 ± 0.29 0.01 ± 0.01 0.49 ± 0.09 ( 0.33 ± 0.33 ) ± 0.20 1.22 ± 0.32 (0.50 ) 0.42 ± 0.40 ssg 0.26 ± 0.31 ( ±) - 0.25 ± 0.04 0.42 ± 0.39 0.08 ± 0.05-0.52 ± 0.44 (0.29 ) ± 0.18 ± 0.42 (0.07 0.54 ± 0.18 (0.35 0.76 ± (0.27 ) 0.46 ±0.32 0.41 0.43 0.62 0.96 Figures parentheses show contribution of storage % relation to total production * Sum of the loss as % of the total produce from all storage channels (i.e. sum of the figures parentheses) In cottonseed the gng of cotton bolls is done to separate the cotton from the seed 8.89 2.76 6.26 3.68 4.55 ± 10.07 ±1.41

Table 6.4: Harvest and Post Harvest es of Fruits (%) at National 1 Apple 4.56 ±1.41 2 Banana 1.33 ±8.59 3 Citrus 0.92 ±1.39 4 Grapes 0.94 ±1.94 5 Guava 4.36 ±1.53 6 Mango 4.11 ±2.37 7 Papaya 1.45 ±1.56 8 Sapota 1.53 ±1.14 0.42 0.36 0.48 ±1.01 ±1.10 1.20 ±1.05-4.79 ±1.51-0.93-1.79 ±1.16-3.21 ±1.26-4.64 ±1.18-2.80 ±1.54-1.97 ±0.92-1.43 -gg - - - - 0.44 ±0.46 - - 0.35 ±0.94 - - 0.26 - - 0.94 - - 0.51 - - - - 0.08 ±0.51 Harvestg Threshg Sortg/ Gradg Wnowg/ Cleang Dryg 1.19 1.14 ±1.29 1.30 ±1.67 1.93 ±1.13 2.77 ±0.73 2.53 ±2.49 1.13 ±1.35 1.06 ± 11.06 4.18 ±5.08 4.84 ±1.30 6.57 ±1.39 13.92 ±1.17 10.64 ±1.89 5.06 4.31 2.26 1.60 ±1.02 1.94 ±2.96 5.54 ± 2.10 ±1.27 (0.41 ) 1.50 2.10 ±3.34 0.84 1.47 ± 1.21 ( ±) 3.34 ± ( ± 0.99 ± 0.63 (0.52 ±0.32) 2.39 ± 1.06 (1.85 ±0.82) 1.28 ± 0.64 (0.69-1.61 ± 0.84 (0.54 ±) - 5.91 ± 1.09 (1.83 ±0.34) - 2.50 ±1.14 (0.92 ) ± 2.28 ±1.48 (1.02 ) - 1.74 (0.75 ) Cold 1.10 ± 0.49 ( ±) 2.44 ± 1.51 ±) 2.29 ± 0.79 ( ) 2.17 ± 0.74 (0.84 ) 3.79 ± 1.57 (1.80 ±0.75) 2.67 ±1.70 (0.93 ) 2.39 ±1.28 (1.20 ) 1.71 (0.73 ±0.32) ssg 1.70 ± 4.24 (0.29 ±0.73) 0.26 ± ± 0.26 2.69 ± 1.03 (0.30 5.71 ± 0.66 0.87 ) 0.03 ±0.03 1.20 ±0.81 2.42 ±0.85 1.54 1.73 4.13 ±0.86 2.11 ±0.73 2.28 ±0.92-1.46 ±0.40 12.26 ±1.05 6.60 ±3.43 6.38 ±1.15 8.30 ±1.00 18.05 ±1.12 12.74 ±1.57 7.36 ±1.04 5.77 Figures parentheses show contribution of storage % relation to total production * Sum of the loss as % of the total produce from all storage channels (i.e. sum of the figures parentheses)

Table 6.5: Harvest and Post Harvest es of Vegetables (%) at National 1 Cabbage 1.08 ±2.84 2 Cauliflower 0.84 ±1.78 3 Green Pea 3.46 ±2.63 4 Mushroom 1.37 ±2.45 5 Onion 2.70 ±2.54 6 Potato 3.18 ±4.02 7 Tomato 1.73 ±1.26 8 Tapioca 3.61 ±2.77 0.30 0.27 1.08 ±1.07 1.77 ±3.08 0.69 ± 1.06 0.51 ±0.62-1.64 ±2.10-1.66 ±2.30-3.30 ±2.22-4.26 ±4.59-1.64 ±1.37-2.23 ±3.41-3.24-1.54 ±1.52 - - 0.27 - - 0.18 - - ±0.50 - - 1.64 ±2.10 - - ± - - ± - - - - 0.53 Harvestg Threshg Sortg/ Gradg Wnowg/ Cleang Dryg gg 1.32 1.91 ±1.13 0.50 2.00 ±0.85 0.44 0.54 3.14 ±1.20 1.28 4.61 ±1.71 4.85 ±1.38 8.58 ±1.78 11.03 ±2.96 5.17 ±1.47 6.73 ±2.53 9.94 7.47 ±1.79 2.10 ±2.09 ( 1.52 ±1.30 1.18 ±1.77 ) 1.11 0.30 2.20 ± (0.88 ) 2.17 ±1.69 (1.00 ) 1.32 ±1.93 (0.72 ±1.05) Cold 2.62 (1.21 ) 2.31 ±1.60 ( ±0.63) 2.44 (0.92 ) - - - 1.73 (1.51 ) 2.67 ±1.98 (0.54 ±0.40) 3.88 ±2.10 (0.35 ) 4.62 ±2.75 (1.22 ±0.72) 4.13 ±4.19 ( ) 2.18 ±0.93 (0.40 ) 1.36 (0.76 1.57 2.19 (0.83 ) 3.87 ±0.61 (0.96 2.66 ±0.72 (1.06 ) - 1.47 ±0.75 ( 2.57 (0.57 ) 2.41 ±0.65 2.27 ±1.16 (0.58 ±0.30) 1.70 ±1.04 (0.74 ±0.46) ssg 2.31 ±1.68 2.33 ±0.50-2.03 ±1.01-1.70-1.51 0.09 0.43 2.00 ±1.65 ( ±) 2.34 ( 2.34 2.26 ±0.43 3.04 1.72 Figures parentheses show contribution of storage % relation to total production * Sum of the loss as % of the total produce from all storage channels (i.e. sum of the figures parentheses) 6.94 ±1.51 6.88 ±1.32 1 ±1.67 12.54 ±1.40 7.51 ±1.09 8.99 ±1.87 12.98 ±1.00 9.19 ±1.52

Table 6.6: Harvest and Post Harvest es of Plantation s and Spices (%) at National 1 Arecanut 1.90 ± 2 Cashew 3 Coconut 1.57 4 Sugarcane* 2.78 ±1.75 5 Black Pepper 0.71 6 Chilli 1.64 ±1.05 7 Coriander 2.19 ±1.36 8 Turmeric 3.66 ±6.47 0.86 ±0.61 0.71 ± 3.32 0.39-1.36 ±1.77-0.31 ±6.55 0.46 - ±0.85 3.10 ±1.66 - ±1.93 0.41 ± - - ±0.95-0.83-0.66 ±0.51-3.52 ±0.62* - ±0.57 1.14 ±1.46 0.92 ±0.30 -gg 0.06 ± 0.09 ±0.34 Harvestg Threshg Sortg/ Gradg Wnowg/ Cleang Dryg/ Stalg* 0.01 ±0.05 ±0.63 0.31 0.20 6.62 ±0.32 4.10 ±0.87 7.79 ±1.85 3.60 3.95 6.81 6.72 ±3.34 1.53 ±0.91 1.94 ( 0.83 ±2.62 ±) 0.90 ±1.32 1.89 ±0.65 1.32 (0.18 ) ± ± 1.24 ±0.18 (0.88 ) 1.08 (0.46 1.85 (0.27 0.36 ±0.18 2.09 (0.32 - - ±0.15 ± 0.61 ± 0.57 1.78 (1.19 ) 0.52 (0.31 ) - 0.95 (0.43 ±) 0.50 ( 1.96 ±0.88 0.40 ( 0.76 ) ssg 0.74 ( ( 1.37 1.16 (0.81 ±0.72) 0.03 ±0.02 0.99 ) ± 1.26 1.27 0.90 0.27 ±0.03 1.66 ±0.55 0.51-0.66 Figures parentheses show contribution of storage % relation to total production * Sum of the loss as % of the total produce from all storage channels (i.e. sum of the figures parentheses) 7.87 ±0.34 1.12 ± 5.36 8.64 ±1.82 3.86 5.60 7.31 7.37 ±2.53

Table 6.7: Harvest and Post Harvest es of Livestock Produce and Jaggery & Khandsari (%) at National 40 Egg - 2.08 41 Inland Fish 42 Mare Fish 2.62 ±2.58 43 Meat 1.36 44 Poultry Meat - 2.67 45 Milk 46 Jaggery & Khandsari -gg - - - - 0.98-1.63 ±2.16-0.09 - - 0.46 Harvestg Threshg Sortg/ Gradg Wnowg/ Cleang Dryg 1.83 ±0.90 0.32 - - - 1.56 4.88 ± 5.18 ±1.66 1.81 - - - - - - - 1.36 - - - - - - - 2.67 0.49-0.01 - - - - - 0.07 - - - - 0.33 ± 0.52 0.76 ± 1.00 ±1.98 ) - 1.72 (0.98 ±) - 2.45 (0.82 ) - - 0.64 ±0.05 ( - - 0.98 ±0.86 (0.48 ±0.40) - - 0.57 (0.31 ±0.34) 0.09 1.79 ±2.11 (0.15 ±0.18) Cold 1.73 ±0.91 (0.66 ±0.34) 1.43 ±1.22 (0.84 ±0.73) 1.71 ( 0.81 (0.42 ) 1.51 ±1.26 ( ±0.57) ssg 2.07 ±1.51 1.67-1.75 1.67 (0.44 ) 0.97-0.87 0.07 - - - ±0.02 1.96 ±0.65 (0.46 2.03 ±1.90 (0.60 ) Figures parentheses show contribution of storage % relation to total production * Sum of the loss as % of the total produce from all storage channels (i.e. sum of the figures parentheses) Livestock produce meat cludes the meat of Sheep and Goat only. For meat and poultry meat, estimation of loss commenced from slaughterg (analogous to harvest operation). In Mare fish,estimation of loss commenced from landg at sea shore (analogous to harvest operation). ± 0.98 1.35 6.55 6.92 ±1.49 2.78 2.23 3.65 1.87