FDEP Site Priority Scoring Guidance

Similar documents
MEMORANDUM. RAI Responses Related to East Lake Road Wellfield Drawdown Analysis, WUP No SDI Project No. PCF-180.

Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Report for Rowe Elementary School

Livingston County Department of Public Health Environmental Health Division. Hydrogeologic Investigation Requirements for Land Division Developments

Subsequent to these early efforts, the complexities associated with potable water provision have increased significantly.

WELLHEAD PROTECTION DELINEATION REPORT FOR THE VILLAGE OF BEAR LAKE DECEMBER 2002

Chapter Nine, Potable Water Subelement City of St. Petersburg Comprehensive Plan

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Florida Water-Use Program

CHAPTER 10 NATURAL GROUNDWATER AND AQUIFER RECHARGE ELEMENT

Aquifer Science Staff, January 2007

Chapter Nine, Potable Water Subelement City of St. Petersburg Comprehensive Plan

Source Water Assessment Program (SWAP) Report for Heath Elementary School

Purpose. Utilize groundwater modeling software to forecast the pumping drawdown in a regional aquifer for public drinking water supply

Performance and Analysis of Aquifer Slug Tests and Pumping Tests Policy

APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WATER WELL IN THE LOWER PLATTE NORTH NATURAL RESOURCES DISTRICT

Lab 6 - Pumping Test. Pumping Test. Laboratory 6 HWR 431/

MARION COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2035

Madison Water Utility Pressure Zone 4 Well Siting Study

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ADEM) NOTICE OF INTENT NPDES GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER ALG360000

By Paul Robinson Research Director Southwest Research and Information Center PO Box 4524 Albuquerque, NM

The Costs of NO Wellhead Protection. -- all cases from Maine

ADVISORY OPINION IMPACT OF CREC FACILITY ON WATER SUPPLY & USE IN DISTRICT & WELL REMEDIATION DRAFT FOR PUBLIC REVIEW & COMMENT

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

Balancing Total Estimated Recoverable Storage and. Wade A. Oliver, P.G. Texas Alliance of Groundwater Districts Groundwater Summit August 27, 2015

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT

within the Southwest Florida Water Management District

PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY WELLHEAD PROTECTION REGULATIONS

Industrial Activity and Site Contamination

Case Study A Comparison of Well Efficiency and Aquifer Test Results Louvered Screen vs. Continuous Wire-Wrapped Screen Big Pine, California

A. POTABLE WATER AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGE WATER SUB-ELEMENT

PUTNAM COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN EXHIBIT DD INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT

Minimum Saturated Thickness Calculator

REQUIREMENTS FOR PERMANENT CLOSURE OF UNDERGROUND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE STORAGE TANKS

Spokane County Water Demand Forecast Model

Supplemental Guide II-Delineations

STRATEGIES FOR CHARACTERIZING SUBSURFACE RELEASES OF GASOLINE CONTAINING MTBE

VARIANCE REQUEST FOR EXPANDED WATER USE FROM EXISTING WELL IN A STAY MANAGEMENT AREA OF THE LOWER PLATTE NORTH NRD (LPNNRD)

Application for Gas Exploration and Production

In support of an alternative water supply

Advanced Well Test Analysis and Traditional Methods For Injection Well Evaluation 1

The Interconnectedness Between Spring Creek Springs and Wakulla Spring and the Effects on Flow at Wakulla Spring

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ADEM) NOTICE OF INTENT NPDES GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER ALG110000

PIMA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CO PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY MAJOR PLAN AMENDMENT

Bureau of Drinking Water & Groundwater Wisconsin DNR

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Bureau of Environmental Cleanup and Brownfields

Green Remediation of Petroleum Contaminated Groundwater Using Oxygen Injection in Western Maine

PENNSYLVANIA WELLHEAD PROTECTION PROGRAM

Rehoboth Beach Effluent Disposal Study. Evaluation of Wastewater Discharge Alternatives. Center for the Inland Bays STAC Meeting January 13, 2006

APPROVED SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN: CTC Source Protection Region

COMMUNITY FACILITIES ELEMENT

FEE SCHEDULE 7 Water Development and Connection Fees Aurora Water (Platted Before January 1, 2017)

SECTION RISK-BASED ASSESSMENT AND CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR NON-UST PETROLEUM RELEASES

ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT (ADEM) NOTICE OF INTENT NPDES GENERAL PERMIT NUMBER ALG030000

Surfactant Enhanced Remediation Of Petroleum and Chlorinated Contaminated Sites. Bud Ivey Ivey International

ALABAMA S FUTURE WITHOUT SUSTAINABLE WATER RESOURCES? NOT ON OUR WATCH. Marlon Cook

Harford County Health Department Resource Protection Division

Michael Weatherby, P.G., MWH, Tampa, FL

Environmental 101 for Safety Managers. EHSICC Annual Conference September 2012

Petroleum Restoration Program. Pathway To Closure. March 30, 2017

This document also includes proposed permit requirements, including response actions, when excursions occur.

RULE 4651 SOIL DECONTAMINATION OPERATIONS (Adopted April 16, 1992; Amended December 17, 1992; Amended September 20, 2007)

STORMWATER HARVESTING FOR ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY IN VOLUSIA COUNTY, FLORIDA

CHAPTER 6 SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT

18. WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT Goal, Objectives and Policies

CONTAMINATION TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM. Florida Department of Transportation. District One. SR 710 Improvement Project

15A NCAC 02L.0106 CORRECTIVE ACTION (a) Where groundwater quality has been degraded, the goal of any required corrective action shall be restoration

Wellhead Protection. Protection. for safe drinking water in Indiana. A Shortcut to Wellhead Protection Delineation for Some Systems.

Site Profiles - View. General Information. Contaminants: Site Hydrology:

Groundwater Sources, Well Design, and Permitting

Excavation of petroleum-contaminated soil and tank removal sampling Petroleum Remediation Program

NEW MEXICO WATER LAW CONFERENCE AUGUST 26 27, Ogallala Aquifer: Where s The Water? By W. Peter Balleau

Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Spill Prevention and Response

The Hydrogeology Challenge: Water for the World TEACHER S GUIDE

Hydrogeology Laboratory Semester Project: Hydrogeologic Assessment for CenTex Water Supply, Inc.

WATER WELL MONITORING PLAN

Instructors/Trainers. Groundwater Sampling Training Workshop. Objectives of GW Sampling. Agenda Estimated time (minutes) Course Objectives

MTBE Fact Sheet #2 Remediation Of MTBE Contaminated Soil And Groundwater Background

Results of Blue Sink Pumping Test No. 2 Hillsborough County, Florida Final Report

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT

New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Site Remediation Program

Chapter 11: Hazardous Materials A. INTRODUCTION

PART A. AQUIFERS & DARCY S LAW - INTRODUCTION

SECTION.0500 RISK-BASED ASSESSMENT AND CORRECTIVE ACTION FOR PETROLEUM RELEASES FROM ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS AND OTHER SOURCES

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER QUALITY DIVISION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL (UIC) CLASS V WELL

Coal Combustion Residuals (CCRs)

Appendix F Pump Test Technical Memoranda

T E C H N I C A L M E M O R A N D U M

THE DAVIS BASIN DO NOT DELAY IN GETTING STARTED RIGHT AWAY!

THE CADIZ VALLEY WATER CONSERVATION, RECOVERY, AND STORAGE PROJECT

COMPREHENSIVE FINAL REPORT

POLK COUNTY SOUTHEAST WELLFIELD DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLANNING LEVEL PROJECT DETAILS. (Water Supply Options project number 28)

Vapor Extraction / Groundwater Extraction (VE/GE) System Initial Report

Safe Drinking Water Program. Public Water System Permitting

WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT AND MICROSCOPIC PARTICULATE ANALYSIS (MPA) DATA REPORT

Regulation of Mines In South Florida

Brenna McDonald Missouri Department of Natural Resources Missouri Geological Survey

INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT SANITARY SEWER SUB-ELEMENT

WATER USE PERMIT APPLICATION

MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SITE REMEDIATION SECTION

Intent, Goal, Policies, and Action Strategies Prince William County Comprehensive Plan Proposed Water Projects (fold-out map)

Transcription:

FDEP Site Priority Scoring Guidance Criteria: Requirements: Fire/Explosion Hazard 1. Free product or volatilized petroleum products at or above 20% of the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) in existing utility conduits or vaults, buildings or other inhabited confined spaces (60 points). 2. Ignitable free product on surface waters or impoundments (60 points). * Recommend that a LEL Meter is used to determine if free product or volatilized petroleum products exists at 20% of the LEL. Must be a documented existing condition. * Storm sewers, monitoring/compliance wells, remediation system components and tank access vaults do not qualify as an inhabited confined spaces. * Must be measurable (0.1 inches) free product. Documentation is required. Threat to Uncontaminated Drinking Water Supplies. 1. Uncontaminated municipal or community well fields of greater than 100,000 gallons per day permitted capacity with a well within 1/2 mile of the site (30 points). * Well must be a community supply well located within 1/2 mile of the site. * Permitted capacity of the Well Field must be greater than 100,000 gpd. (Do not use the Design Capacity of Well Field) * Well located within 1/2 mile of site can not be contaminated (applies to any contamination, not just petroleum). * Multiple wells within 1/2 mile does not mean multiple points, 30 points only regardless of the number of wells. * Well location and capacity must be documented on the Site Inspection (SI) sheet, the drinking water database (PWS114), and/or the HRS sheet. Verification from the City, County or Water Mgmt Dist. (WMD) can also be used. * If location or capacity of the well is ever in question contact the local government for verification. * CAR s, Topo s and Discharge Reporting Forms are not used for Well documentation.

2 1a. If the well field s 1 foot draw down contour is known to encompass the site regardless of the well field s distance from the site (20 points). 1b. If the well field is located down gradient of the site (15 points). 2. Uncontaminated private wells constructed prior to date of contamination discovery, or uncontaminated public water system well field with less than 100,000 gallons per day permitted capacity with a well within 1/4 mile of the site (20 points). 2a. If the well field s 1 foot draw down contour is known to encompass the site regardless of the well field s distance from the site (10 points). 2b. If the well field is located down gradient of the site (5 points). 3. Uncontaminated surface water body used as a public water system supply within ½ mile of the site (10 points). * If a large community well is located within 1/2 mile, use the Theis equation in Excel to determine drawdown radius of the wellfield. * If there aren t any wells within 1/2 mile, search a 2 mile radius for any large community wells (search in 1/4 mile increments). Note that some sources, list design capacities rather than permitted capacities. To obtain the wellfield s permitted capacity, contact the local government or WMD. * If there is a well within 1/2 mile but it isn t large enough to get points for drawdown then do a 2 mile search as explained above. * The Theis Equation is explained below. * Multiple points are not given for multiple wellfields * Well field must be within 1/2 mile of the site. * Downgradient direction needs to be documented. Look up the direction in a technical report or on a Topo. * Private wells must be located within 1/4 mile of site. * Wells must have been constructed prior to date of contamination. If construction date is in question, verify with WMD or local government. * The well must be an uncontaminated potable well. * Well location must be verified by SI sheet, HRS, PWS114, and/or local governments. * Irrigation wells do not receive points. * Small wells typically do not have a large enough capacity to receive drawdown points. If the private well is on site and not contaminated, then a 1 foot draw down is assumed and the site receives the 10 points. * Direction of groundwater flow must be documented. * Well must be within 1/4 mile * This information can be found on the HRS sheet, the SI sheet or additional information provided by a local government.

Migration Potential: 3 1. Source Characteristics (select only one) a. Recent spills or free product found in wells/ boreholes (4 points) except free product of 2 inches or more in 2 or more wells/ boreholes (6 points). b. Recent product loss or wells/groundwater contaminated but no free product (2 points). * Recent Spill means a discharge of petroleum products within 365 days prior to the date of the site scoring. * This information can be found on the SI sheets in the site file or obtained from the local agency. * If no information is provided then the site receives 2 points for this category. 2. Product Type (select only one): 2a. Light petroleum product (kerosene, gasoline, aviation fuel and similar petroleum products) with water soluble additives or enhancers (MTBE, ethanol and similar substances) (3 points). 2b. Light petroleum product with no additives or enhancers (2 points). 2c. Heavy petroleum product (fuel oil, diesel and similar petroleum products) (1 point). * Product type can be found on the SI sheet. Laboratory data must be provided to verify additives or enhancers. * If lab data does not verify additives, then the site receives 2 points. * If lab data is not provided but discharge was gasoline, then the site receives 2 points. * Site receives 1 point if discharge was heavy petroleum product. * 1 point is given if product type is not known. Environmental Setting: 1. Site located in G-1 aquifer (4 points). * Only Northeast Flagler County receives G-1 aquifer points. 2. Site located in a G-2 aquifer (2 points). * All sites except Northeast Flagler County and the Keys receive 2 points. * Sites located in the Keys do not receive aquifer points. 3. Site located in a high recharge/permeability geological area (4 points). 4. Site located within 1/2 mile of an Outstanding Florida Water (1 point) * Use Water Resource Investigation Report 84-4210 to determine if site is eligible for high recharge points. Find site location on the map, if site is located in a dark blue or white area then 4 points is given. * Outstanding Florida Water, includes protected water bodies and park areas. A booklet listing all Outstanding Florida Water Bodies is available from the DEP s Standards and Monitoring Section.

4 Additional Scoring Information * Wells beyond 2 miles are not included in site scoring. * If all requirements are met, then a site can receive 30 points for having a large community supply well within 1/2 mile, 20 points for drawdown & 10 points for down gradient. The or on the score sheet does not mean that the site can only receive points for either drawdown or down gradient. * If there aren t any large wells within 1/2 mile, then the site would receive zero points for 1 &1b. Still do a 2 mile search to locate any additional wells that might receive the 20 points for drawdown. * If no large well exists within 2 miles of the site, but 10 or greater private potable wells exist within 1/4 mile, then the site receives 30 points for small wells instead of 20. The private wells must not be contaminated and must have been installed prior to date of contamination. If any of the wells are down gradient of the site then the additional 5 points are awarded. * If no small wells exist within 1/4 mile of the site then 2, 2a & 2b are all zero points. * If verification of a well s existence, location, capacity, and/or permitted use is needed, check with any of the following: County Government City Government HRS County Office Water Management District Request documentation verifying well information. * Irrigation or Industrial wells are not considered for scoring purposes. * Multiple wells or wellfields does not mean multiple points. * When rescoring a site, if points awarded during a previous scoring event can not be verified then the points are taken away. * The current score sheet does not award points for work completed by site owner. Any points previously given for this category will be taken away when rescoring the site.

5 Theis Equation T = Transmissivity (feet squared per day) s = storativity (no units) Q = Permitted Capacity (gallons per day) not Design Capacity R = radius around the well (feet) For Scoring purposes a 1 foot drawdown and 30 days is assumed. The T and s values for several counties can be found on the Setup sheet (Attachment 4). Locate the correct county and write the T & s values on the score sheet. When more than one city is listed, use the T & s value for the city nearest the site. If the county is not on the Setup sheet then go to Professional Paper 1403-B to determine the Transmissivity, and Water Resource Investigation Report 84-4210 to determine storativity. The Transmissivity on PP 1403-B is given in ranges, write the range on the score sheet, and calculate Theis using both ends of the range. Locate the site on WRIR 84-4210, aka the blue map, the same map that is used to determine high recharge. If the site is located in a dark blue area then s = 0.2; if the site is located in a light blue or white area then s = 0.0001. T & s values from a local government agency can be used instead of using the Setup sheet or PP 1403-B/WRIR 84-4210, but it must be noted on the score sheet and documentation provided. Enter the T, s & Q value in the Modified Theis Equation (the first equation on the spreadsheet). After entering this information the U value is calculated, record the value of U on the score sheet. If U is less than 0.01 write down the determined R value on the score sheet. Check to see if the R value extends out far enough from the well to encompass the site. If it does then the site receives 20 points for large well drawdown. If U is greater than 0.01 then scroll down to the Theis Equation, either the 3rd or 4th equation given can be used, the only difference is the 3rd assumes 1 foot & 30 days, the 4th allows these values to be adjusted. Using the calculated value of W(u), look up the U value and enter this number next to the cell labeled U from table. Record the calculated value of R on the score sheet and determine if the site is within the well field s 1 foot drawdown contour. For example, if the well is 1/2 mile (2640 ft) from the site then the R value would have to be at least 2640 ft for the site to receive the 20 points. If the R value is any less than 2640 ft then this site would not receive the 20 points for drawdown. WRIR 84-4210 and PP 1403-B are both available from the USGS. U values can be found in Table 5 - Values of W(u) for values of u between 10-15 and 9.9 from Ferris, Knowles, Brown & Stallman, 1962 pg. 90.