Nickel-63 Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies and Implications to RETS and Groundwater Monitoring Efforts

Similar documents
Naturally-occurring Carbon-14 and Implications to Power Plant Dose Assessment

Radiological Environmental and Public Exposure Considerations for Existing and Future Nuclear Power Plants

Facts and Perspective

Rad Monitor Set Points and the RETS. Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.

Beyond the Guidance. Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc. Presented at the 2013 RETS-REMP Workshop Westminister, CO / July 24-27, 2013

Regulatory Insights. RETS-REMP Workshop San Jose, CA 28-Jun U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Millstone OpenEMS Dose Factors Bases. Claude Flory, Chemistry, Millstone Power Station, Dominion Nuclear Connecticut

REMP (and Later) RETS Audits

Beaver Valley rower Station

BRIEF HISTORY OF THE RETS [RADIOLOGICAL EFFLUENT TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS]

Contents. Draft Version A Rev 8(2) BRANCH TECHNICAL POSITION ON CONCENTRATION AVERAGING AND ENCAPSULATION

ATTACHMENT III TO IPN OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL, REVISION 14

C-14 Dose Calculation Methods at Nuclear Power Plants

Analysis of Blending of Low-Level Radioactive Waste

METHODOLOGY FOR ENSURING THE INTEGRATION OF ALARA INTO THE DESIGN OF

DEP-EPA-PWD Meeting. Iodine-131 in Philly DW Issue. David J. Allard, CHP. PaDEP Bureau of Radiation Protection. March 28, (Rev.

Contents. I. Longstanding EPA Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) Pursuant to the Safe Drinking Water Act

Draft Branch Technical Position on Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation, Revision 1

Purpose Of Characterization Surveys. Professional Training Programs

NORM AND UNCONVENTIONAL OIL & GAS PRODUCTION

Concentration Averaging and Encapsulation Branch Technical Position, Revision 1

RETS-REMP Workshop June, 2013 Westminster, CO

U.S. EPA RADIATION REGULATIONS UPDATE. Tom Peake Radiation Protection Division ISCORS November 9, 2010

Challenging Environmental TLD Posting Height Requirements

Symposium on Recycling of metals, April 8-10, 2014, Studsvik. The Metal Recycling Process and its Nuclide Distribution

EPRI LLW Disposal and Waste Storage Research Program

WCS Compact Waste Facility Disposal Capacity Report. February 2012

Radioactive Waste Management and Environmental Surveillance at KANUPP. Khawaja Ghulam Qasim Sr. Manager (KANUPP)

Storm Drain Tritium Discharges RETS/REMP Workshop Roger Tolbert Grand Gulf Jim Key Key Solutions, Inc.

Ground Water Monitoring Guidance for Nuclear Power Plants EPRI Report No

NUREG-1549: Decision Methods for Dose Assessment to Comply With Radiological Criteria for License Termination

Exel(5n. Nuclear Plant Effluent and Radiological Environmental Monitoring Programs

Environmental Radiological Monitoring for Nuclear Power Reactors (Nuclear Facility)

Influence of Fuel Design and Reactor Operation on Spent Fuel Management

Material Selection According to ALARA during Design Stages of EPR. P. Jolivet, A. Tamba, F. Chahma AREVA

Radiochemistry Webinars

Presentation to NAS Workshop Oct 2016 M. Garamszeghy, NWMO, Canada

NRC REGULATORY ISSUE SUMMARY (2014-XX) REPORTING OF H-3, C-14, Tc-99, and I-129 ON THE UNIFORM WASTE MANIFEST

Low-Level Waste and Radiation Management

Dose and Risk Assessment Dr. Charley Yu Dr. David LePoire Argonne National Laboratory

Natural Uranium and Thorium Deposits in Upstate South Carolina: A Case Study in Environmental Health Physics

Specific Activity millicuries/gram (microspheres) 32, curies/gram (solutions)

PROPOSAL FOR UNCONDITIONAL CLEARANCE LEVELS FOR CONTAMINATED SOIL FROM ITALIAN NPP

Probabilistic Versus Deterministic Analysis for Demonstration of Compliance with the Dose Criteria in 10 CFR Part 20, Subpart E

Minnesota Department of Health Environmental Monitoring Report 2012 Data

April 26, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Washington, D.C Attention: Document Control Desk. Subject:

VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA April 24, 2000

INPO Perspective Groundwater Protection and RETS/REMP Meeting June 2014

RADIUM AND YOUR DRINKING WATER (A HOMEOWNER S GUIDE)

Minnesota Department of Health Environmental Monitoring Report 2013 Data

EPRI Alpha Monitoring and Control Guidelines for Operating Nuclear Power Stations, Revision 2 ( )

Minnesota Department of Health Environmental Monitoring Report 2011 Data

Environmental Dosimetry

Population Exposure to Natural Radiation Sources in Romania

Regulation of Waste Streams from Small Modular Reactors and Advanced Reactors

Radiation Contamination after the Chernobyl Nuclear Accident and the Effective Dose Received by the Population of Croatia

o u ;9D2 A DEMONSRATION OF DOSEMODELING.'i ":... AT YUCCAMOUNTAIN r.,.. : t; November _,:== = = _ _i_=o::

Methods for Determining the Release of Radioactive Material into the Environment

U.S. EPA Superfund Radiation Policy and Guidance

RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT AT CERNAVODA NPP AFTER 5 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE

Update On Tritium Issues at Nuclear Power Sites. Dale Holden Duke Energy

Radiological Emergency Preparedness. Radiological Accident Assessment Concepts Update Workshop

WM2011 Conference, February 27 - March 3, 2011, Phoenix, AZ. Performance Assessment Inventory Considerations at Savannah River Site

Experiences on a Regulatory Clearance of the Radioactive Wastes at KAERI

5 SURVEY PLANNING AND DESIGN

Influence of data uncertainties and model sensitivity on the estimate of tritium doses

WASTE ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE KONRAD REPOSITORY

Overview of US NRC Decommissioning Surveys, Surface and Subsurface, Release Criteria and Records

Carbon-14 Background, Pathway, and Dose Calculation Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants: A Sourcebook for Accurate Carbon-14 Dose Calculations

Specification for Phase VII Benchmark

UKEPR Issue 05

Radiation Safety at the University of Vermont

Marcellus Shale & TENORM

1

Environmental Monitoring Report

Environmental Monitoring Report

The objective of this chapter is to provide criteria with which to assess the safety of

Investigation of Meteorological Tower Siting Criteria

Questions regarding Tritium, Spent Nuclear Fuel and Security. 1. What are the standards for ground water contamination at the Vermont Yankee site?

Determination of pure beta emitters using LSC for characterization of waste from nuclear decommissioning Xiaolin Hou

Spent Fuel Safety Studies and Analyses

Nuclide Safety Data Sheet Hydrogen-3 [Tritium]

Overview of Environmental Impact Assessment in Korea

Safety Review Models on Radioactive Source Term Design For PWR Waste Treatment Systems

Sixty-Day Notice of Intent to File Suit for Violations of the Safe Drinking Water Act.

DOE Environmental Monitoring Study Guide 00ICP322 Rev.0 Page 1 of 15

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Low-Level Waste and Radiation Management

ifl \O Sq FUSRAP sites in the area Exposure pathways are not necessarily confined to site boundaries U.S Army Corps of Engineers

Cook Critical RP Survey Program

Radioactive Waste Management at the NCSR Demokritos - Greece

Pyrolysis of Spent Ion Exchange Resins 12210

SAMPLING AND RADIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF COMPONENTS OF THE TRIGA REACTOR AT THE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF HANNOVER

Federal Authority for Nuclear Regulation UAE

Fate of Groundwater Radionuclides Moving Through Small Community Systems

Problems of nuclear legacy regulation in Russia

Spent Fuel Storage Operational Experience With Increased Crud Activities. I. Barnabás Public Agency for Radioactive Waste Management (PURAM), Hungary

Analysis Of Generic Exemption Levels For Radioactive Material

Decontamination of Uranium Contaminated Metals 15 Years of Experience Arne Larsson, Per Lidar, Maria Lindberg, and Bo Wirendal Studsvik

08:00-10:00: Session 1 (Grand Ballroom) Session Chair: Doug Wahl. 10:00-11:30: Session 2 (Grand Ballroom) Session Chair: Greg Barley

Transcription:

Nickel-63 Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies and Implications to RETS and Groundwater Monitoring Efforts Ken Sejkora Entergy Nuclear Northeast Pilgrim Station Presented at the 22 nd Annual RETS-REMP Workshop Orlando, FL / 25-27 Jun 2012

Recent OE Involving Ni-63 OE34998 - Nickel 63 Activity Not Quantified in Liquid Effluents (Prairie Island) Nickel 63 activity levels in high level/low level radioactive resin were found to be 10 times higher than Cobalt 60 activity levels. Despite the elevated activity levels of Ni-63 in the Solid Effluent Waste, the Chemistry department has not been analyzing the liquid effluent waste for Ni-63 Identified during NRC effluent inspection

Regulatory Guidance Standard ODCM guidance in NUREG-1301/1302 does not require Ni-63 analysis for liquid effluents; only requires Fe-55, Sr-89, and Sr-90 Verbal guidance from NRC at recent RETS-REMP Workshops has been to use 10CFR61 waste analyses to determine additional analyses for hardto-detect nuclides in liquid effluents Parallel approach to principal radionuclide concept in Revision 2 to Regulatory Guide 1.21

Reason for Concern - 1 Ni-63 can be a major contributor to total activity, especially at PWRs activation of stable nickel from stainless steel in steam generators Ni-63 characteristics Neutron activation of Ni-62, 3.66% abundance, 15 barn cross-section Half-life = 100.1 years 100% beta decay -- 65.9 kev max, 17.1 kev average; no gamma; relatively low dose compared to gamma emitters

Reason for Concern - 2 Ni-63 can be a major contributor to total activity, raising potential for occurrence in liquid effluents and groundwater Proper assessment of dose consequence Proper derivation of LLDs for analysis Proper selection of 10CFR61 waste stream for assessment of fractional activity

Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies - EPA Drinking Water Standard - 1 EPA drinking water guidelines (40CFR141.66) do not list limit specifically for Ni-63; would be grouped under Gross Beta concentration limit of 50 pci/l = 4 mrem/yr dose EPA water guidelines based on NBS Handbook 69, Maximum Permissible Body Burden for Occupational Exposure, circa 1963 similar to ICRP-2 methodology Occupational exposure, adult male Assuming 50 pci/l will result in 4 mrem/yr dose consequence, 2 liter/day consumption rate equates to 3.65E4 pci/yr intake Effective DCF becomes 1.10E-4 mrem/pci

Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies - EPA Drinking Water Standard - 2 40CFR141.66 specifies that for radionuclides not specifically listed in 141.66 Table 1, the DW concentration limit should be based on 4 mrem/yr dose resulting from drinking water at a rate of 2 liters/day containing the 168-hour MPC value listed in NBS Handbook 69 168-hour MPC value for Ni-63 is 3E-4 uci/ml, resulting in a dose consequence of 5000 mrem/yr Scaled MPC value: (4 mrem/yr / 5000 mrem/yr) * 3E-4 uci/ml = 2.4E-7 uci/ml, or 240 pci/l Assuming 240 pci/l will result in 4 mrem/yr dose consequence, 2 liter/day consumption rate equates to 1.75E5 pci/yr intake Effective DCF becomes 2.28E-5 mrem/pci

Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies Regulatory Guide 1.109 Regulatory Guide 1.109 Dose Factors based on ICRP-2 methodology from late 1950s Dose conversion factors mrem/pci ingested Organ Bone Liver T.Body Thyroid Kidney Lung GI-LLI Adult 1.30E-4 9.01E-6 4.36E-6 1.88E-6 Teen 1.77E-4 1.25E-5 6.00E-6 1.99E-6 Child 5.38E-4 2.88E-5 1.83E-5 1.94E-6 Infant 6.34E-4 3.92E-5 2.20E-5 1.95E-6 Similar order of magnitude (xe-4 mrem/pci) to EPA DW standard; bone dose 15-70 times higher than other organs

Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies 10CFR20 Appendix B Effluent Limits 10CFR20 Appendix B Effluent Concentration limits based on ICRP-30, circa 1970s; new dose models 10CFR20 Appendix B EC limit based on CEDE dose consequence of 50 mrem/yr Table 2, Column 2 EC for Ni-63 = 1E-4 uci/ml Assuming 1E-4 uci/ml will result in 50 mrem/yr dose consequence, 730 L/yr consumption rate equates to 7.3E+7 pci/yr intake Effective DCF becomes 6.85E-7 mrem/pci

Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies ICRP-30 Dose Factors ICRP-30 CEDE dose factors used as basis for 10CFR20 Appendix B EC limits Dose factors for occupational exposure, adult standard man Dose conversion factors mrem/pci ingested CEDE = 5.78E-7 mrem/pci Bone = 3.15E-7 mrem/pci Maximum Organ (LLI Wall) = 3.40E-6 mrem/pci Bone is not critical organ as in RG-1.109; maximum organ dose only ~6X higher than EDE

Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies ICRP-72 Dose Factors Current international standard for member of public, circa late 1996; multiple age groups as in RG-1.109 Dose conversion factors mrem/pci ingested Age Class CEDE Bone LLI Adult 5.56E-7 3.22E-7 3.41E-6 15-yr 6.67E-7 3.52E-7 4.07E-6 10-yr 1.04E-6 4.81E-7 7.41E-6 5-yr 1.70E-6 8.15E-7 1.22E-5 1-yr 3.11E-6 1.30E-6 2.41E-5 Infant 5.93E-6 3.07E-6 3.70E-5

Dose Conversion Factor Anomalies Comparison Dose conversion factors mrem/pci ingested EPA DW Standard Gross Beta (adult) EPA DW Standard Ni-63 NBS (adult) RG-1.109 Infant Bone RG-1.109 Infant Total Body 10CFR20 Appendix B (adult CEDE) ICRP-30 CEDE (adult) ICRP-30 Bone (adult) ICRP-72 Infant CEDE ICRP-72 Infant Bone 1.10E-4 2.28E-5 6.34E-4 2.20E-5 6.85E-7 5.78E-7 3.15E-7 5.93E-6 3.07E-6 EPA drinking water standard and RG-1.109 significantly overestimate dose consequence; 200X ICRP-72 values

Derivation of LLDs - 1 Ni-63 analyses are not required by NUREG- 1301/1302, therefore no LLD requirements or guidance exist Necessary to derive equivalent LLDs commensurate with those in ODCM Effluent LLDs for liquid effluent composites (Effluent LLDs for gaseous effluent composites) REMP-equivalent LLDs for groundwater

Derivation of LLDs 2a Liquid Effluent LLD Cs-137 is a commonly-accepted surrogate in radiological scaling applications Use Cs-137 as scaling factor, yielding equivalent dose consequence to Cs-137 LLD ODCM Liquid Effluent LLD for Cs-137 = 5E-7 uci/ml Scale Cs-137 liquid LLD based on ratio of water EC limit values from 10CFR20 Appendix B: Cs-137 water EC Limit = 1E-6 uci/ml (~50 mrem/yr dose) Ni-63 water EC Limit = 1E-4 uci/ml (100X Cs-137) Derived Ni-63 Liquid LLD: 5E-7 uci/ml * (1E-4 1E-6) = 5E-5 uci/ml liquid (~21 mrem/yr dose)

Derivation of LLDs 2b Gaseous Effluent LLD Use Cs-137 as scaling factor, yielding equivalent dose consequence to Cs-137 LLD ODCM Gaseous Effluent LLD for Cs-137 = 1E-11 uci/ml Scale Cs-137 gaseous LLD based on ratio of air EC limit values from 10CFR20 Appendix B: Cs-137 Air EC Limit = 2E-10 uci/ml (~50 mrem/yr dose) Ni-63 Air EC Limit = 2E-9 uci/ml (10X Cs-137) Derived Ni-63 air LLD: 1E-11 uci/ml * (2E-9 2E-10) = 1E-10 uci/ml air (~0.8 mrem/yr dose)

Derivation of LLDs - 3 Groundwater LLD Use Cs-137 as scaling factor, yielding equivalent dose consequence to Cs-137 LLD ODCM REMP LLD for Cs-137 = 18 pci/l Scale Cs-137 LLD based on ratio of water EC limit values from 10CFR20 Appendix B: Cs-137 water EC Limit = 1E-6 uci/ml Ni-63 water EC Limit = 1E-4 uci/ml (100X Cs-137 EC) Derived Ni-63 water LLD: 18 pci/l * (1E-4 1E-6) = 1800 pci/l (~0.8 mrem/yr dose)

Derivation of LLDs - 4 EPA Drinking Water LLD Standard practice in EPA drinking water standard is to set LLD at 10% of limit EPA DW Limit for Gross Beta = 50 pci/l; however, this limit is based on erroneous dose factors that are grossly over-conservative Resulting DW LLD would be 5 pci/l, approximately 360-times lower than LLD of 1800 pci/l derived from equivalent dose consequence; corresponding dose ~0.0025 mrem/yr Due to flawed approach, EPA Gross Beta DW limit should not be used to establish target LLD for Ni-63

Selection of Proper 10CFR61 Waste Stream - 1 Screening of Ni-63 to determine fractional activity contribution based on 10CFR61 waste disposal analyses Two major categories of waste defined in Regulatory Guide 1.21 Rev. 1 Spent resins, filter sludges, evaporator bottoms, etc. Dry Compressible Waste, contaminated equipment, etc.

Selection of Proper 10CFR61 Waste Stream - 2 Resins have different affinities for different chemical species (anions, cations, etc.) may not be representative of radionuclide mix in liquid waste streams or radionuclides released to environment from leaks DAW radionuclide profile likely represents materials that have been in contact with or leaked out of contaminated systems may be more representative of materials in liquid effluents and material released to the environment from leaks 10CFR61 profile for DAW is most likely the best choice to determine fractional Ni-63 activity contribution

Summary Ni-63 can qualify as a principal radionuclide relative to total activity; likely not principal related to dose, but overly-conservative dose factors may inflate fractional dose contribution Dose factors from RG-1.109 are overly conservative and will result in overestimating maximum organ dose by more than 100-times EPA drinking water limit of 50 pci/l for gross beta is inappropriate for Ni-63

Summary (continued) 10% of EPA drinking water limit should not be used to establish Ni-63 LLDs for groundwater Recommended target LLDs for Ni-63 scaled from equivalent ODCM Cs-137 LLDs: Liquid Effluent LLD = 5E-5 uci/ml Gaseous Effluent LLD = 1E-10 uci/ml REMP/Groundwater LLD = 1800 pci/l 10CFR61 nuclide profile for Dry Activated Waste is likely most representative for determining if Ni-63 constitutes a major fraction of total activity

Questions?