Technical Service Bulletin October 2013 TSB

Similar documents
Reclamation of Sand Filter Backwash Effluent using HYDRAcap LD Capillary UF Membrane Technology

Hollow Fiber and Tubular UF Pilot Testing Procedures & Case Studies

Ben Freeman AWWA/AMTA 1

What Is Membrane Performance Normalization?

Technical Service Bulletin September 2018 TSB131.11

PERFORMANCE AND RESIDUAL MANAGEMENT ASSESSMENT OF 5 MGD MEMBRANE WATER PLANT. Presented by: Stephen P. Dorman, P.E.

Copper Removal from Cooling Tower Blowdowns

Air Connection on Rack. Filtrate Connection on Rack

Copper Removal from Cooling Tower Blowdowns

Membrane Systems. Featuring Aqua MultiBore Membranes

Ultrafiltration Technical Manual

BASF/inge dizzer XL 0.9 MB 70 WT UF Membrane Pilot Testing for City of Ashland, OR

Ultrafiltration or UF is a pressure driven membrane separation process that. The Omexell UF system utilizes a double-walled hollow fiber (capillary)

Product Manual. Trademark of The Dow Chemical Company ( Dow ) or an affiliated company of Dow

Recent Advances in Membrane Technologies Peter D Adamo, Ph.D., P.E Spring Conference Wilmington, NC April 13, 2015

U-Version. Incoming City Water

Design Parameters Affecting Performance

PRESENTATION OF DESALINATION VIA REVERSE OSMOSIS

Low Pressure Membrane Filtration System Operations

Engineering & Equipment Division

Ultrafiltration of Desizing Effluents. Lecture 24

MICRODYN-NADIR. MICRODYN isep 500 Ultrafiltration Modules. Product Manual. Product Manual

DOW TM Ultrafiltration

Pall Aria System Rescues Bottled Spring Water Producer from Plant Closure

MEMCOR MEMBRANES FOR DRINKING WATER APPLICATIONS

Innovative Ultrafiltration (UF) Membrane for Produced Water Treatment

Gregory E. Choryhanna and Alan R. Daza, SEPROTECH SYSTEMS INC. Process Development Division Ottawa, Canada

Producing High-Purity Recycled Water for Industrial Applications with Microfiltration and Reverse Osmosis: Lessons Learned

NEW LOGIC RESEARCH. Case Study

DEVELOPMENT OF THE. Ken Mikkelson, Ph.D. Ed Lang Lloyd Johnson, P.E. Aqua Aerobic Systems, Inc.

PNW AWWA Conference 2009 Todd Reynolds, PE, BCEE

Reverse Osmosis. Background to Market and Technology

Scientific & Technical Report

Lenntech. Tel Fax

Key words: Integrated Membrane System, IMS, Seawater Reverse Osmosis, SWRO, SW30HRLE- 400, Ultrafiltration, UF, ZeeWeed 1000

Ceramic Ultra Filtration with Zero Liquid Discharge Better Water, Safer Water, Lower Cost. Purification Capability. Applications

Rueter-Hess Water Purification Facility

Optimizing Membrane Filtration Using the Revised Self Assessment Guide. Ed Chescattie Planning Section Chief SC Safe Drinking Water Program

Operating Guidelines Cleaning

Hydranautics Nitto DESIGN SOFTWARE and SUPPORTING TOOL

DOW Ultrafiltration. Case History. DOW Ultrafiltration Membranes Offer Reliable, Economical Answer to High Solids

OLTRE CAP V- SERIES OUTSIDE IN AIR SCOUR ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANES

A Hands-On Guide to Ultrafiltration/Diafiltration Optimization using Pellicon Cassettes

FILMTEC Membranes. Tech Manual Excerpts. Principle of Reverse Osmosis. Figure 1: Overview of Osmosis / Reverse Osmosis

ULTRAFILTRATION Pre-Test (UFPT) First experiences with a small size Ultrafiltration test system as a quick performance test

DOW Ultrafiltration. Case History. DOW Ultrafiltration Modules Protect Reverse Osmosis System from High Iron

Innovative concept for Ultrafiltration systems: Integration of ultrafiltration cartridges and strainer in a single vessel

AS-H Iso-Disc Cloth Media Filter

OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE MANUAL UF-6-HF ULTRAFILTRATION SYSTEM

Improved Membrane Design Addresses Integrity Issues for the City of Yuba City Water Treatment Plant

High-Flux Polymeric Membrane for Industrial Water Separation

A Hands-On Guide to Ultrafiltration/ Diafiltration Optimization using Pellicon Cassettes

POLYCERA: A NOVEL ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE PROVIDING OPEX SAVINGS FOR RECLAIMED WASTEWATER APPLICATIONS. Introduction

Condensate Management Monitoring Condensate

APPLICATION OF LOW FOULING RO MEMBRANE ELEMENTS FOR RECLAMATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER.

EVALUATION OF MF/UF CHEMICAL CLEANING STRATEGIES IN DIRECT POTABLE REUSE APPLICATIONS. Introduction

POREX Tubular Membrane Filter Modules For Metal Contaminated Wastewater Treatment & Reclamation

PILOTING MF INTO NF FOR HARDNESS REMOVAL

VSEP Membrane Filtration of Table Olive Wastewater

MEMBRANE PILOT FOR A DIRECT REUSE APPLICATION: ENGINEERING AN MF/UF & RO PILOT. Ignacio Cadena, P.E. Freese and Nichols, Inc.

Optimizing the Performance of the ESPA4

POREX Tubular Membrane Filter (TMF) Applied in a Copper Wastewater Reclaim System for a Printed Circuit Board Facility

Advanced Treatment by Membrane Processes

PRESSURIZED ULTRAFILTRATION MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE AT THE VENTURA, CALIFORNIA DEMONSTRATION PLANT. Abstract

Use of Spiral Wound UF in RO Pretreatment

Submerged Membranes to Replace Media Filters to Increase Capacity 4X for a Small Community. Richard Stratton, PE HDR Engineering, Inc.

AD26 Systems for Iron, Manganese, Sulfide and Arsenic Removal

Georgia Power Plant Bowen NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised December 2017

Keeping the RO Membranes of the Future Continuously Clean. Author: Boris Liberman, Ph.D. VP CTO IDE Technologies Ltd

Keywords nanofiltration; capillary membrane; direct treatment; backflush; surface water.

WATER PURIFICATION FOR INDUSTRY

Hybrid Filtration. Utilizes the Benefits of Continuous and Traditional Filters without any of the Drawbacks

WATER TREATMENT PLANT SOLVES MEMBRANE INTEGRITY PROBLEMS AND SATISFIES NEW STATE REQUIREMENTS. Abstract

HEAVY INDUSTRY PLANT WASTEWATER TREATMENT, RECOVERY AND RECYCLE USING THREE MEMBRANE CONFIGURATIONS IN COMBINATION WITH AEROBIC TREATMENT A CASE STUDY

Cartwright Consulting Co.

How to Complete the Membrane Filters Worksheet of the SWMOR-Alt

How are they doing? Check-up on the Enaville and Glenns Ferry Microfiltration WTPs

DESIGN AND OPERATION OF POROUS METAL CROSSFLOW MICROFILTERS

Cartwright Consulting Co.

RO System Design & CSMPRO v6.0 Program

Georgia Power Plant McManus NPDES Permit No. GA Ash Pond Dewatering Plan. Revised April 2018

POREX Tubular Membrane Filter (TMF ) Applied in a ZLD System as Critical Solid/Liquid Separation Process

Membrane Thickening Aerobic Digestion Processes

Pora. A Host of Latest Water Membrane Technologies

Commissioning and Operation of a 50 mgd Ultrafiltration Advanced Reclamation Facility for Gwinnett County, Georgia

Lenntech. Tel Fax

Trident. Package Water Treatment System

APC. Ultrafiltration Membranes

The Basics. Reverse Osmosis is a process that is used to remove. Front Side 1. Controller

Basic Design Concepts of MBR

Operating parameters influencing Ultrafiltration of organic model solutions

rios Water Purification system The standard for laboratory-grade water

9-2. Wet-weather high-speed wastewater filtration system (primary treatment of untreated wastewater)

Continuous Water Recycling For Reusable Plastic Containers

West Basin s Universal Membrane System Pressurized PVDF Performance Pilot Program Particulars

REVERSE OSMOSIS INSTALLATION AND OPERATION MANUAL. R12-Wall Mount

Lenntech. Using EDI to Meet the Needs of Pure Water Production. EDI Process. Summary. Introduction

AIChE Industrial Water Reuse. Applying Advanced Technologies to Reuse Applications Erik Hanson Director of Product Management, Systems

ENHANCED MEMBRANE CLEANING WITH REDUCING AGENTS TO REMOVE IRON FOULING. Introduction

CAUTION. Why is Data Collection Important? Why Normalize Data? Causes for Changes in Apparent Membrane Performance

Transcription:

Technical Service Bulletin October 2013 TSB 139.03 Data Logging, Normalization and erformance Analysis for HYDRAcap Systems. This Technical Service Bulletin provides information for manual data logging, data normalization and HYDRAcap performance analysis. General Most HYDRAcap systems have supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) such that operating data is capable of being automatically acquired and stored at least every minute. Despite this technical convenience, manual data logging should be performed at every HYDRAcap plant. Not only does the physical act of data logging allow operators to inspect their systems, but it also facilitates corroboration amongst transmitters and gauges. Data sheets are also a good backup source of data should the electronic data be lost. Data Logging Sheet A sample data logging sheet is provided below. This sheet lists all parameters that are necessary to determine HYDRAcap performance. Some systems incorporate supplemental equipment as part of the ultrafiltration process, such as a screen filter, chemical injection, tanks, particle counters and ph probes. Data from each of these items should be logged, as well, to ensure proper plant performance and establish baseline characteristics. A data set from each HYDRABLOC or rack should be manually logged at least once per day (minimum), and preferably once per operator shift. A data set includes both data logged two minutes prior to backwash and two minutes after backwash. This allows for an accurate assessment of backwash efficacy and HYDRAcap performance. The following is a description of parameters used in the data logging sheet: Date calendar date. Time local time. Hour Meter machine time, usually in hours. Temperature feed water temperature in degrees Celsius, [ o C]. Screen Filter ressure In water pressure entering the screen filter, [psi].

TSB139.03 age 2 Screen Filter ressure Out water pressure exiting the screen filter, [psi]. Bottom ressure water pressure on the feed side of the HYDRAcap module, [psi]. Top ressure - water pressure on the top feed/top concentrate side of the HYDRAcap module, [psi]. Filtrate ressure water pressure on the filtrate effluent side of the HYDRAcap module, [psi]. Feed Turbidity feed water turbidity, [NTU]. Filtrate Turbidity filtrate water turbidity, [NTU]. Filtrate Flow instantaneous filtrate flow, [gpm]. Bleed Flow - instantaneous bleed flow, [gpm]. Recycle Flow - instantaneous recycle flow, [gpm]. Comments time remaining until next backwash [minutes], type of backwash (i.e., high ph, low ph or oxidant CEB), chlorine concentration, or other notable events. Data normalization is required to determine HYDRAcap performance. As feedwater temperature changes, so does membrane permeability. Temperature change not only effects feed water viscosity, but also membrane permeability. Significant temperature fluctuations yields significant fluctuations in observed transmembrane pressure (TM), and actual plant performance may not be determined. For this reason it is necessary to normalize operating data to a reference temperature. For simplicity, our reference temperature for normalization is 20º Celsius. The following equations should be used in determining HYDRAcap system performance: Flux is filtrate flow rate per unit area of membrane. Flux is a system design parameter that has a direct correlation with membrane fouling rate. As flux is increased, so is the fouling rate. Flux calculation: 1440 Q J, A w here J - filtrate Q - filtrate A m m [gfd] flux,[gallons/f t flow,[gallons/m inute]. - effective membrane 2 /day]. area,[ft 2 ]. Trans Membrane ressure (TM) is the net driving pressure on the membrane. This is the effective pressure for forcing water through the membrane. A clean membrane will

TSB139.03 age 3 have a relatively low TM, whereas a fouled membrane will have a relatively high TM, depending on the severity of fouling. When TM reaches 15-20 psi a chemical cleaning is recommended. NOTE: TM should never exceed 20 psi. Trans Membrane ressure calculation: top TM filt, [psi] 2 w here, TM - trans membrane top filt - feed pressure, [psi]. - concentrat e pressure, [psi]. - filtrate pressure, [psi]. pressure, [psi]. Temperature Compensated Specific Flux (TCSF), or permeability is an intrinsic property of the membrane and should be used to determine membrane performance. In relation to the startup, a significantly high TCSF may indicate chemical degradation of the membrane, whereas a low TCSF may indicate fouling. When the TCSF reaches 7-9 gfd/psi, a chemical cleaning is recommended. NOTE: TCSF should never decrease below 7 gfd/psi. Temperature compensated specific flux calculation: TCSF w here, J TM TCSF - temperatur e compensate d specific flux. J - flux,[gfd]. * e ( 0.031*( T20)) TM - trans membrane T - w ater temperatur e, [ pressure, [psi]. o, C]. [gfd/psi] Differential pressure or Δ is the pressure drop across the fiber length on the feed/lumen side. Δ is calculated from the difference between feed and top feed pressure during processing. Δ increases as the membrane fouls due to increased filtration resistance across the length of the fibers. Excessive Δ (>6 psi) may cause fiber damage. Δ calculation:

TSB139.03 age 4 w here top - top, [psi] - feed pressure, [psi]. - concentrat e pressure, [psi]. Note: top must be greater than filt Instantaneous Recovery is the recovery of a HYDRAcap system for one processing/backwash cycle. Actual daily recovery may vary from that calculated from a single processing/backwash cycle due to chemical cleaning, chemically enhanced backwashing (CEB), integrity testing or other occurrences that might alter the processing duration and net filtrate production. Instantaneous recovery is calculated based on the following formula: Instantaneous Recovery: w here R - system recovery. BW volume FiltGross Bleed FF volume (processing cycle is the time volume of bleed w ater w asted durring single processing cycle. - volume R of w ater used for FiltGross of filtrate w ater produced of feed w ater used for FiltGross - Bleed BW FF 100, single backw ash cycle. [%] for single processing betw een tw obackw ashes). cycle. forw ardflush step during single backw ash process. or if the bleed and forw ardflush are equal to zero, the R 1- BW FiltrGross *100, formula [%] simplifies to : BW This is the total volume of filtrate used during a single backwash sequence. This volume may vary depending on the type of backwash (i.e., standard or CEB). To accurately calculate the instantaneous recovery, it is important to include the water consumed for the backwash, the

TSB139.03 age 5 backwash top, and when chemical enhanced backwash is performed, the rinse. Filt The gross amount of produced filtrate from a single processing cycle. Unless a totalizer is available on the SCADA or flow transmitter, it will be difficult to obtain accurately the volumes used to calculate recovery. This reason is due to the fluctuation in flow, due to temperature changes, fouling and the frequency drives on the pumps. Bleed When system works with cross flow, part of the water stream can be directed to the waste as reject. Such flow is called bleed. In UF systems, for efficiency purposes, only small part of the cross flow is sent to drain as bleed. This value is usually 5-25% of the feed flow. Feed water quality (TSS, TOC, BOD) greatly impacts bleed volume. It is trade off between recovery and system fouling ratio. Because fouling usually produces difference in flow distribution in the system (relation between bleed and filtrate flow), the net bleed flow can vary substantially in single processing time duration. Totalizer installed in the bleed effluent line allows system operators maintain stable conditions using closed loop control system complemented with flow control valve on bleed line. Recovery, Δ, TCSF and TM are the minimum parameters that should be calculated and monitored to determine HYDRAcap performance. For a complete assessment of the HYDRAcap system performance, other parameters should be monitored as well (i.e., turbidity rejection, TOC rejection, TSS rejection etc.) HYDRAcap erformance Analysis Recovery Unless HYDRAcap optimization is to be performed or system feedwater conditions change, each HYDRABLOC and HYDRAcap module should operate at constant recovery. Assuming the system is currently in equilibrium, this will ensure good and predictable performance. Increasing recovery may cause the system to operate erratically. Signs of unstable operation are increasing TM and decreasing specific flux. As a result, previously determined chemical cleaning schedules will change and cleanings frequencies will increase. Flux Similar to recovery, the temperature compensated flux should be kept constant. As the temperature of the feed water changes, the instantaneous flux may need to be changed accordingly. If possible, flux should be monitored and controlled by the SCADA. Any

TSB139.03 age 6 change on the flux should be accompanied with the appropriate adjustment of the backwash frequency and sequence durations. Δ Differential pressure is important for analysis only when cross flow or bleed flow is utilized. In direct or dead end filtration the Δ is low, and in most cases will not be beneficial in determining the degree of membrane fouling inside the fiber lumen. However, crossflow or bleed flow will yield much information about fiber plugging or cake layer build-up. Fiber plugging is a potential hazard to hollow fibers integrity. It is of the utmost importance that, at a minimum, a 150m screen filter be incorporated to condition feed water prior to HYDRAcap modules. As fibers become plugged, effective membrane area decreases. Once a significant number of fibers have been plugged, localized flows become excessive and fiber breakage or rapid fouling may occur. Should a significant increase in Δ occur (also an increase in TM) then a module should be taken off-line and feed end fibers inspected. If there is no observable blockage over the fibers, then most likely a thick cake layer has formed and the backwash frequency should be optimized and a chemical cleaning should be performed. Trans Membrane ressure (TM) When flux and temperature are constant, the TM is indicative of the degree of fouling on the membrane. A clean membrane will have a constant TM, assuming the previous conditions are met. However, water viscosity and membrane resistance are dependent on temperature. When water temperature changes, TM changes as well. This effect is common for every membrane process. In some cases when water temperature fluctuates significantly, TM fluctuations will occur. This is also true when flux varies. Thus, an increasing TM does not necessarily indicate fouling, only the possibility of fouling. Care should also be taken to ensure that the TM during backwash does not exceed 20 psi. CAUTION: TM should never exceed 20 psi (1.4 bar) or fiber damage may occur. ermeability or Temperature Compensated Specific Flux (TCSF) For any HYDRAcap system it is critical that the TCSF be monitored. Being an intrinsic property of the membrane, TCSF will represent the condition of the membrane regardless of the changes in temperature or flux. The benefits of properly maintaining TCSF will translate into the energy usage as well. As the membrane fouls, and the TCSF decreases, energy requirements will increase (if system operating parameters remain constant). CAUTION: TCSF should never decrease below 7 gfd/psi (172 lmh/bar) or fiber damage may occur

TSB139.03 age 7 Useful Tips: 1. Take data daily and if possible once per shift. Keep on-line data as a more reliable information source and record a complete data set at least every minute. 2. lot each parameter versus time in such scale to observe sudden spikes on data trends. 3. Log graphs in journal and keep them available at operator control room. 4. Log events of errors in control on the UF system as well bad service and operation. 5. Try to analyze every upset in data trends (especially TM, Flux and ermeability). 6. Trace water quality and its relation to system performance. 7. Trace the effect on water temperature to fouling ratio. Lenntech info@lenntech.com Tel. +31-152-610-900 www.lenntech.com Fax. +31-152-616-289