Nitrogen Management in Sugarcane and Cotton in Louisiana

Similar documents
SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

SUGAR CROPS PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AT THE IBERIA RESEARCH STATION. Iberia Research Station Jeanerette, LA 2

SUGAR CROPS PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AT THE IBERIA RESEARCH STATION. Iberia Research Station Jeanerette, LA 2

Development of Cotton N Fertilization Algorithms, Southern USA

The Use of Crop Sensors and Variable Rate Technology for Precision Application of Nitrogen to Cotton

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT RESEARCH IN LOUISIANA SUGARCANE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

New Crops for Biofuel/Bioproduct Production. Donal F. Day Professor, LSU AgCenter

BILLET PLANTING RESEARCH

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH. Jeff W. Hoy, Laurie B. Grelen, Carolyn F. Savario, Jane Q. Paccamonti Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology

Rick Mascagni and Kylie Cater

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2007

EVALUATING THE EFFECTS OF COMBINE-HARVEST RESIDUE MANAGEMENT ON SOIL AND WATER QUALITY AND SUGARCANE PRODUCTION IN LOUISIANA

IMPACT OF SUGARCANE FALLOW MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES ON WATER QUALITY AND PLANT YIELD

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE. In Cooperation with Sugar Research Station

BILLET PLANTING RESEARCH. J. W. Hoy and C. F. Savario Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology

2017 Crop Demonstrations and Research Trials St. Francis County

Evaluation of nitrogen application methods, rates, and algorithm on corn under different soil electrical conductivity (EC) zones

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

ECONOMICALLY OPTIMAL CROP CYCLE LENGTH FOR MAJOR SUGARCANE VARIETIES IN LOUISIANA

BILLET PLANTING RESEARCH

Seedcotton Yield and Petiole Potassium Concentrations as Affected by Potassium Fertilization

Nitrogen Management Guidelines for Corn in Indiana

Grain Sorghum Hybrids for Grain Hybrid Selection

Sugarcane Fertilizer Recommendations. R. Johnson, H.Viator, B. Legendre

Using Cotton Yield Monitor Data for Farm-Level Decision Making. Terry Griffin, Dayton Lambert, Jess Lowenberg-DeBoer, and Bruce Erickson

SUGARCANE VARIETY FOCUS

Evaluating Sugarcane Varieties in Southeast Texas. Beaumont, TX. 2003

Switchgrass and Sweet Sorghum Fertilization for Bioenergy Feedstocks Gene Stevens, Roland Holou, David Dunn, and Allen Wrather

Cotton Varieties. for Louisiana. Variety Trials and On-Farm Demonstrations. LSU AgCenter Pub 2135 Cotton Varieties for Louisiana

Annual Report for Potash & Phosphate Institute (PPI)/Potash & Phosphate Institute of Canada (PPIC) and Foundation for Agronomic Research (FAR)

system that supports soil and crop water management.

CALCULATED LAND USE VALUES

250 N uptake N removed. N rate, lb/ac

A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Sugarcane Growers

Improving Cotton Production Efficiency With Phosphorus and Potassium Placement At Multiple Depths in Strip Tillage Systems

Sustainable Bioproducts Initiative (SUBI) First Year Progress Report. Vadim Kochergin

2017 Wyoming Forage Sorghum Trial Results

Michael E. Salassi 1 and Michael A. Deliberto 2 1 Professor and 2 Research Associate, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness

A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Sugarcane Growers

Cotton Varieties. for Louisiana. Variety Trials and On-Farm Demonstrations

Sensor Strategies in Cotton. Stacia L. Davis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Irrigation Engineering LSU AgCenter

PART 5 PAGE Trial Year 2018 Total number of pages in this section at initial pagination:

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH RATOON STUNTING DISEASE

ESTIMATED COSTS OF SOLDIER AND COMBINE SUGARCANE HARVESTING SYSTEMS IN LOUISIANA

Cotton Economics Market Outlook, Production, and Policy

Sugarcane Crop Values, Crop Leases, & the Economic Impact of Burning

Wheat Straw Management, Variety Selection, and Row Spacing for Double-cropped Soybean Production

Precision Ag A Midwestern Look at Cotton Production. Randy Taylor Extension Ag Engineer Biosystems & Ag Engineering Oklahoma State University

Brian Williams Minnesota Department of Agriculture. Nutrient Efficiency and Management Conference February 15,2012 Morton, MN

Cotton Varieties. for Louisiana. Variety Trials and On-Farm Demonstrations. LSU AgCenter Pub 2135 Cotton Varieties for Louisiana

SOIL FERTILITY RESEARCH IN SUGARCANE IN 2003

Cotton Varieties. for Louisiana. LSU AgCenter Pub 2135 Cotton Varieties for Louisiana

United States Department of Agriculture. Executive Summary 8:30 AM NOVEMBER 9, 2011

A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Sugarcane Growers

Sugarcane Fertility Update. R. Johnson, H. Viator, B. Tubana

ARKANSAS WHEAT Jason Kelley - Wheat and Feed Grains Extension Agronomist September 13, 2017

Environmentally Sustainable Utilization of Nitrogen on Corn 2015

Cotton Nitrogen Management - Acala Cotton: Field Tests, Soil & Plant Tissue Testing

FOR SALE. Contact: Panola & Quitman Counties, Miss. Total Size Location. Description. Cropland Soils Improvements

Development of On-the-go Nitrogen Application Algorithms for Cotton Production Based on Active Reflectance Sensors

Institute of Ag Professionals

Fertilizer Placement Options Demonstration

Cotton Response to Tillage Rotation and Row Spacing

A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Sugarcane Growers

Reflectance-based Nitrogen Fertilizer Management for Irrigated Cotton

Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing

Using AnnAGNPS to Evaluate On-Farm Water Storage Systems (OFWS) as a BMP for Nutrient Loading Control in a Small Watershed in East Mississippi

A Farm Planning/Decision Tool for Louisiana Sugarcane Growers

Corn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea

SMALL PLOT EVALUATION OF INSECTICIDES AGAINST THE SUGARCANE BORER, 2014

Soil Management Practices for Sugar Beets Grown on Organic Soils

IMPACTS OF PAPER MILL PRIMARY CLARIFIER SLUDGE ON SUGAR CANE PRODUCTION AND YIELDS

Corn Hybrids for Grain 2015

USDA Use of Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (suas)

CORN & SOYBEAN AGRONOMY UPDATES. Angela McClure December 2015

Evaluation of Mosaic MicroEssentials Sulfur Fertilizer Products for Corn Production

Nitrogen Management for Irrigated Malting Barley Blaine G. Schatz and Paul Hendrickson

Independence of yield potential and crop nitrogen response

Pheromone Trap Assisted Scouting - Mexican Rice Borer in Sugarcane

UTILITY OF POLYMER-COATED UREA AS A FALL-APPLIED N FERTILIZER OPTION FOR CORN AND WHEAT

Accelegrow. Accele-Grow-M. accelegrow.com. Accelegrow Technologies, Inc. PO BOX 569 West Point, GA

2007 ARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM RESEARCH VERIFICATION PROGRAM

Cotton Irrigation in Kansas

The value of proper soil testing and use in precision Ag

Minnesota Nutrient Management Initiative. On-Farm Evaluation of Nitrogen and Phosphorous Nutrient Management

Rice Nitrogen Management- Rates and Timing of Urea Fertilizer Gene Stevens and David Dunn University of Missouri-Delta Research Center

Valuation of Perennial Crops Associated with Agricultural Land Sales: The Case of Sugarcane in Louisiana

Nitrogen Management in Direct Seeding Operations

BILLET PLANTING RESEARCH. J. W. Hoy and C. F. Savario Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology

CROP ROTATIONS TO COMPLEMENT WINTER WHEAT

ARKANSAS CORN AND GRAIN SORGHUM. Final Report. Optimizing Soil Fertility Requirements for Corn. Leo Espinoza, Soils Specialist, University of Arkansas

USDA Long Grain Rice Planted Acreage June 30, 2017 with Prospective Planting Comparison March 31, Rice U.S. and States June 30, 2017

The Economics of Rice Production

Integrating Technologies to Enhance the Simplicity of Strip Tillage Systems

CORN RESIDUE HARVESTING EFFECTS ON YIELD RESPONSE TO N FERTILIZATION

B. L. Legendre 1, K. A. Gravois 1, K. P. Bischoff 1 and J. L. Griffin 2

What does the introduction of energy crops mean for the crop mix and cellulosic ethanol plant location in Louisiana?

PROJECTED COSTS AND RETURNS COTTON, SOYBEANS, CORN, MILO AND WHEAT, RED RIVER AND CENTRAL AREAS, LOUISIANA, 1997

National Farmers Convene'17 Springfield, MO 1/25/2017

SPRING FEED & MALT BARLEY & SPRING OATS VARIETY TRIAL DATA

Transcription:

Nitrogen Management in Sugarcane and Cotton in Louisiana Brenda S. Tubana Associate Professor of Soil Fertility School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science Louisiana State University AgCenter

Content Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Sensor-Based N Recommendation (History) Results On-Farm Trials

Acreage of Major Crops Grown in Louisiana Cotton Rice Feed grain Soybean Sugarcane

Sugarcane and Cotton 164,000 acres in production 412,000 acres in production

Soil We Cultivate

Sandy soil Clay LSU AgCenter Sugar Research Station Mississippi River

Unpredictable N demand Cotton

Cane tonnage, ton/ac Varying Magnitude of Response Sugarcane 60 50 40 0 0 N 80 lbs N/ac 14 7 4 13 3 0 14 30 8 20 10 0 Plant Cane 2007 1st Stubble 2008 2nd Stubble 2009 Plant Cane 2010 1st Stubble 2011 2nd Stubble 2012 Plant Cane 2010 1st Stubble 2011 2nd Stubble 2012 St. Gabriel St. Gabriel Iberia

Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Cotton 75 to 150 lbs N/ac, one time application

Nitrogen Fertilizer Management Utilize N recommendation based on N response trials Crop Age Texture N Rate, lbs/ac Plant Cane Light soils 60-80 Heavy soils 80-100 Stubble cane Light soils 80-100 Heavy soils 100-120 These recommendations assume a proper soil ph and an application date of April 1-30.

Sugarcane

Survey Results

Survey Results Nitrogen is a major concern in sugarcane production (71%) 29% own variable rate applicator 50% own GPS unit 21% showed interest on remote sensing technology 67% are interested to use VRT

Survey Results Profitability and cost of investment strong driving force Results in 5 tons/acre increase in cane yield or 1000 lbs/acre increase in sugar yield - potentially assure adoption of new production technology

Planting July to September (Year 1)

N Fertilization April (Year 2, 3, and 4)

Harvesting - Dec (Year 2 plant cane) - Nov (Year 3 1 st ratoon) - Oct (Year 4 2 nd ratoon)

Cane Yield, ton/acre Sugar Yield, lbs/acre Components of Algorithm 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 y = 11.162e 1.5717x r² = 0.4618 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.75 0.85 NDVI 988 2nd Stubble 128 2nd Stubble 226 1st Stubble 384 1st Stubble 540 1st Stubble 226 1st Stubble 233 1st Stubble 540 1st Stubble 226 Plant Cane 233 Plant Cane 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 2000 0 y = 2354.4e 1.7915x r² = 0.5012 0.35 0.45 0.55 0.65 0.75 0.85 NDVI 988 2nd Stubble 128 2nd Stubble 226 1st Stubble 384 1st Stubble 540 1st Stubble 226 1st Stubble 233 1st Stubble 540 1st Stubble 226 Plant Cane 233 Plant Cane

Sensor-Based N Recommendation

On-Farm Trials Established at 3 locations Replications: 3 Plot size: Sugar Research Station - 9000 ft 2 Gravois Farm 33,000 ft 2 Dugas Farm 12,000 ft 2 Sugar Research Station (3 rows x 500 ft) Dugas Farm (5 rows x 400 ft) Gravois Farm (5 rows x 1100 ft)

Farmer s Standard Practice Optical sensor/vrt Crop Age Texture N Rate, lbs/ac Estimated yield potential using SENSOR READINGS Plant Cane Ratoon cane Light soils 60-80 Heavy soils 80-100 Light soils 80-100 Heavy soils 100-120 N Rate = Yield x N response index N-Rich strip

N-Rich Strip SRS Gravois

2015 Optical Sensing/VRT Average N applied : 73 lbs/ac 438/22,008 recommended >120 lbs/ac

Nitrogen rate, sugar yield and net return of sugarcane under different N recommendation approach - 2013 - - 2014 -

Farm Operational Setting

NDVI - UAV

NDVI-UAV

Cotton

Soil Types Silt Loams Silty Clay Loams Sharkey Clays Tensas Parish

Lint yield, lbs/ac Model for Lint Yield Potential Prediction 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 2008 St. Joe - clay 2008 Winnsboro - sl 2009 St. Joe - sl 2009 Winnsboro - sl 2009 St. Joe - cl y = 63.497e 5388.6x r² = 0.4975 600 400 200 0 0.00000 0.00010 0.00020 0.00030 0.00040 0.00050 0.00060 NDVI/cumulative growing degree days

Response Index (lint yield) Response Index (lint yield) Response Index 3 2.5 2 Two Weeks After Early Bloom 2008 St. Joseph - sl 2008 St. Joseph - clay 2008 Winnsboro - sl 3 2.5 2 Two Weeks After Early Bloom 2008 St. Joseph - sl 2008 St. Joseph - clay 2008 Winnsboro - sl 2009 St. Joseph - sl 2009 Winnsboro - sl 1.5 1.5 1 1 0.5 0 2008 RI (lint yield) = 5.129*(RI NDVI) - 4.0811 r² = 0.4116 0.5 1 1.5 Response Index (NDVI) 0.5 0 2009 RI (lint yield) = 4.0336*(RI -NDVI) - 2.9376 r² = 0.3778 0.5 1 1.5 Response Index (NDVI)

Sensor-Based N Recommendation

Variable N Rate Applicator

Demonstration Plots (Cotton) Established at 3 locations Replications: 3 Plot size: 12 rows (40 inches row) x 1000 ft

Crigler s Field 2012 2013 2014 Lint Yield lbs/ac from Nitrogen Application, lbs/ac from Net $/ac FS Pre Mid Adj. Total FS FS 1078 ---- 98 0 0 98 ---- ---- GS 1072-6 52 20 0 72-26 13.22 Lint Yield lbs/ac from Nitrogen Application, lbs/ac from Net $/ac FS Pre Mid Adj. Total FS FS 1772 ---- 100 0 0 100 ---- ---- GS 1802 30 50 38 0 88 --12 29.04 Lint Yield lbs/ac from Nitrogen Application, lbs/ac from Net $/ac FS Pre Mid Adj. Total FS FS 1579 ---- 100 0 0 100 ---- ---- GS 1582 3 50 51 0 101-1 2.82

Balmoral 2012 2013 2014 Lint Yield lbs/ac from Nitrogen Application, lbs/ac from Net $/ac FS Pre Mid Adj. Total FS FS 1576 ---- 130 0 0 130 ---- ---- GS 1543-24 65 23 0 88-42 11.34 Lint Yield lbs/ac from Nitrogen Application, lbs/ac from Net $/ac FS Pre Mid Adj. Total FS FS 1653 ----- 130 0 0 130 ----- GS 1636-17 65 60 0 125-5 -8.46 Lint Yield lbs/ac from Nitrogen Application, lbs/ac from Net $/ac FS Pre Mid Adj. Total FS FS 1336 ---- 130 0 0 130 ---- ---- GS 1344 8 65 26 0 91-39 31.73

Hardwick 2013 Lint Yield lbs/ac from Nitrogen Application, lbs/ac from Net $/ac FS Pre Mid Adj. Total FS FS 1117 ---- 75 0 0 75 ---- ---- GS 1242 125 75 72 0 147 72 39.26

Deep Core Soil Sampling

Preplant Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 0-6 in 33 50 21 66 18 62 22 24 Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 6-12 in 38 30 28 21 32 23 21 16 20 Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 12-18 in 47 34 26 16 26 18 20 14 25 Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 18-24 in 21 31 16 20 30 16 30 17 21 30 21 60 51 46 18 23 35 30 50 27 19 25 30 20 28 18 18 27 27 17 14 27 19 28 17 24 28 16 27 19 17 24 25 17 16 20 37 62 24 22 19 59 22 12 51 26 26 25 40 32 25 21 19 26 18 32 24 20 19 19 25 25 17 19 19 18 27 35 14 11 25 45 66 51 64 21 42 28 12 27 25 25 17 39 18 35 22 9 28 23 18 19 23 15 19 18 12 30 17 28 18 19 13 16 15 19 35 29 8 23 38 43 32 60 30 40 24 14 26 33 22 52 26 16 23 24 22 20 17 22 22 27 20 16 16 9 18 14 23 26 15 16

Post harvest Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 0-6 in Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 6-12 in Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 12-18 in Lbs N (inorganic N)/ac 18-24 in 43 28 32 53 27 29 55 32 23 18 19 14 19 11 9 18 16 18 14 10 10 17 7 10 10 11 14 11 7 7 16 8 6 8 10 14 49 13 31 42 57 55 38 23 46 18 12 11 26 17 2 19 16 24 11 11 8 16 11 14 13 11 20 10 11 6 14 6 5 12 11 12 35 37 39 56 32 24 33 39 34 18 18 12 22 12 9 13 16 23 12 15 8 18 9 7 11 12 13 9 12 8 16 8 7 13 13 11 43 37 28 47 43 17 38 55 39 17 20 9 14 13 14 13 12 24 12 20 6 10 8 11 11 16 21 9 15 6 6 8 5 10 15 33 30 32 23 35 44 19 20 32 40 17 15 18 15 13 13 26 24 24 12 12 9 13 12 9 24 14 17 11 14 7 10 9 7 16 17 16

Summary VRT/GreenSeeker - Increase in net return (savings on N fertilizer) NDVI maps (acquired by high precision images UAV) optional farm operational setting Extension and research work continues

Acknowledgements American Sugar Cane League USDA-AFRI USDA-NRCS-CIG Graduate Students Producers Research Station Staff Dennis Burns Ralph Frazier

Questions