GADS and LOLE Considerations in Gas- Electric Coordination. ENGCTF June 13, 2013

Similar documents
Outage Event Reporting. Module 04 - GADS Data Reporting Workshops

LOLE is expressed as hours per year with the usual target criteria being (0.1 days/year) or 1- day in 10-years MISO Tariff: Module E-1 - The

Maintenance and Planned Outages Capacity Accreditation Under Seasonal Construct Workshop Agenda Item 03c, 3d, 3e.

LOLE Fundamentals Loss of Load Expectation (LOLE) Fundamentals

Business Practice Manual RESOURCE ADEQUACY Planning Years 2013 and beyond

Expanding Capacity Eligibility

UCAP Calculation Comparison

Comparison of Installed Capacity (ICAP) & Unforced Capacity (UCAP) Capacity Value Calculation Methods. Eligibility WG Meeting #3 July 4, 2017

Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) Overview. April 11, 2005

PJM Manual 22: Generator Resource Performance Indices Revision: 17 Effective Date: April 1, Prepared by Resource Adequacy Planning

NERC Probabilistic Assessments Overview & Future Improvements

April 27, Ms. Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 6546 Mercantile Way P.O. Box Lansing, MI 48909

Midwest ISO Resource Adequacy Overview ATC Network Customer Meeting. Kevin Larson Sr. Manager Resource Adequacy October 20, 2010

Resource Availability and Need

Reliability Analysis of Power Plant Unit Outage Problems

Reliability Pricing Model (RPM) DRAFT Business Rules

Introduction to the PJM Markets

Load Modifying Resources. Capacity Instruments affecting Resource Availability and Need

Generating Availability Data System

Alberta Capacity Market

Capacity Performance FAQ Response

Evolution of the Grid in MISO Region. Jordan Bakke, David Duebner, Durgesh Manjure, Laura Rauch MIPSYCON November 7, 2017

2013 PJM Reserve Requirement Study

Market Settlements - Advanced

RRS Education Session #1

GADS Data Reporting Workshop GADS Data Reporting Workshops May, August & October, 2017

ERCOT Public LTRA Probabilistic Reliability Assessment. Final Report

Capacity Market. Overview RPM Capacity Market. Market Design

2012 PJM Reserve Requirement Study

There are 33 columns (fields) of data in the Performance report. 7 are for record identification and status, 16 are required data points and 10 are

CAPACITY MARKETS 5. Overview. RPM Capacity Market Market Design. Market Structure

Concepts for Behind-the- Meter Net Generation

Participation in the monthly auction and the capability period auction shall consist of:

Section IV Performance Reporting

Special Case Resources: Evaluation of the Performance and Contribution to Resource Adequacy

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Resource Adequacy Modeling update. Technical Workgroup #4 June 14, 2018 AESO External

PJM Manual 18: PJM Capacity Market. Revision: 287 Effective Date: January 22, Prepared by PJM Capacity Market Operations

NYSRC RELIABILITY RULES For Planning And Operating the New York State Power System

ATTACHMENT DD. Reliability Pricing Model

4 Calculation of Demand Curve Parameters

Defining Outage States to Include a Mothball Outage

PJM Resource Adequacy Analysis

Installed Capacity Manual. August 2017

2008/ 2009 RPM Base Residual Auction Results

PJM Manual 20: PJM Resource Adequacy Analysis Revision: 08 Effective Date: July 1, Prepared by Resource Adequacy Planning

Gas-Electric Coordination in PJM: Trends, Issues, Interactions, and Looking Ahead

PJM Manual 18: PJM Capacity Market. Revision: 14 Effective Date: February 23, Prepared by PJM Capacity Market Operations PJM 2012

Hydro Coalition Briefing Paper in Response to the PJM Capacity Performance Proposal

Appendix K Outside Management Control

Reliability Modelling: Review Process & Methodology

Capacity Performance Training. March 16, 2015

RPM 301 Performance in Reliability Pricing Model

Capacity Resource Performance in NYISO Markets

Capacity Market. Overview. RPM Capacity Market. Market Design

PJM Manual 20: PJM Resource Adequacy Analysis Revision: 0910 Effective Date: July 1, 2017March 21, Prepared by Resource Adequacy Planning

PJM Manual 18: PJM Capacity Market

CUSTOMER GUIDE TO PJM BILLING

2005 Integrated Electricity Plan. Resource Options Workshop #2 Planning Criteria March 09, 2005

The US, Canada and parts of Mexico are divided into 8 regions. There is a regional coordinator for each NERC region. The regional coordinator or

Capacity Performance Training. June 24, 2015

PJM Manual 18: PJM Capacity Market Revision: 38 Effective Date: July 27, Prepared by Capacity Market Operations

Outage Types and Entering Tickets PJM State & Member Training Dept.

Capacity Market Topics Resource Targets, Qualifications, Performance Standards, Must Offer. Jacqueline DeRosa, Senior Market and Product Economist

Day-ahead ahead Scheduling Reserve (DASR) Market

2016 Probabilistic Assessment. December 5, 2016 Southwest Power Pool

Stakeholder Comments Template. RA Enhancements

Recent Development in Reliable Energy Market in the US and Singapore

LOAD SERVING ENTITIES PJM REGION

2017 Assessment of Reliability Performance Summary Report April 2018

Keith Beall; Edith L. Bandy;

2013/2014 RPM Base Residual Auction Results

What is a Capacity Market?

2011/2012 RPM Base Residual Auction Results

2013/2014 RPM Base Residual Auction Planning Period Parameters

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Electronic Tariff

Alberta Capacity Market

Adequate Summer Electricity Supplies Projected

Introduction to NERC GADS

Alberta Capacity Market Information Session

Methodology to Perform Long Term Assessments

Third Incremental Auction shall mean an Incremental Auction conducted three months before the Delivery Year to which it relates.

Emergency Demand Response in PJM and the NYISO

Introduction to NERC GADS

Key Issues and Consideration in Market Design, Operational and Oversight

Module E-1 Capacity Tracking Tool

Regional Resource Adequacy Draft Regional Framework Proposal. Stakeholder Meeting December 8, 2016

Energy Efficiency in RPM. Adam Keech Director, Market Operations PJM January 13, 2015

Rules and Procedures for Determination of Generating Capability

CALIFORNIA INDEPENDENT SYSTEM OPERATOR ANCILLARY SERVICES REQUIREMENTS PROTOCOL

Reliability and the Future of the Electricity Grid: A North American Bulk Power System Perspective

August 15, Mary Jo Kunkle Executive Secretary Michigan Public Service Commission 7109 West Saginaw Highway Lansing, Michigan, 48917

PJM Wholesale Markets. Hisham Choueiki, Ph.D., P.E. Ohio PUC Staff October 20-24, 2014 Tbilisi, Georgia

California Independent System Operator Corporation. California ISO. Import resource adequacy. Department of Market Monitoring

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff

California Independent System Operator Corporation Fifth Replacement Tariff

Ancillary Service Markets

PJM Manual 21: Rules and Procedures for Determination of Generating Capability Revision: 12 Effective Date: January 1, 2017

Flexible Resource Adequacy Criteria and Must Offer Obligation Working Group Meeting

PJM Sell Back Price Status Quo and Proposed Alternatives

Transcription:

GADS and LOLE Considerations in Gas- Electric Coordination ENGCTF June 13, 2013

Generating Availability Data System (GADS) National database of electric generator performance, produced by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Historical data on 5,900 generators (78%) of US and Canadian fleet Mandatory reporting for all conventional generation >20 MW Typically, asset owners submit to MISO via PowerGADS and to NERC via WebE-GADS Data complied annually; presented for 5 individual years and for 5-year average Data reported on individual unit Design, Performance, and Events 1

Loss of Load Expectation (LOLE) Studies at MISO In accordance with the MISO Tariff, the reliability objective of an LOLE study is to determine a minimum Planning Reserve Margin (PRM) that would result in the MISO system experiencing a less than one day loss of load event every 10 years PRMs provide resource cushion to ensure system reliability Load Serving Entities (LSEs) must meet a Planning Reserve Margin and a Local Clearing Requirement based on their Local Resource Zone LOLE analysis accounts for forced outage rates, planned outages, forecast uncertainty, etc. Many inputs for LOLE analysis are derived from GADS 2

GADS Event Classifications IEEE Standard 762 defines Active and Inactive States Inactive unit is unavailable for service for an extended period of time for reasons not related to equipment Inactive State Code Description Inactive Reserve IR the unit isn t available for service but could be brought back into service in days, with some repairs Mothballed MB the unit isn t available for service but could be brought back into service in weeks to months, with some repairs Retired RU the unit isn t available for service and is not expected to return to service in the future 3

GADS Event Classifications Active States include Outages - unit is not synchronized to the grid system and not in a Reserve Shutdown state Outage Type Code # Outage Characteristics Planned PO Scheduled well in advance; predetermined duration; lasts for several weeks Maintenance MO Can occur any time during the year; has a flexible start date; may or may not have predetermined duration; usually much shorter than a PO Startup Failure SF Occurs when unit is unable to synchronize within a specified startup following an outage or Reserve Shutdown Unplanned (Forced) - Immediate U1 Requires immediate removal of a unit from service, another Outage State or a Reserve Shutdown state; usually results from immediate mechanical/electrical/hydraulic control systems trips and operatorinitiated trips in response to unit alarms Unplanned (Forced) - Delayed U2 Requires removal of unit from the in-service state within 6 hours Unplanned (Forced) - Postponed U3 Requires removal of unit from the in-service state before the end of the next weekend 4

GADS Event Classifications Active States also include Reserve Shutdown - unit is available for load but is not synchronized due to lack of demand; economic outage Lack of Fuel Event Code # Description Lack of Fuel (OMC) 9130 Lack of fuel (water from rivers or lakes, coal mines, gas lines, etc.) where the operator is not in control of contracts, supply lines, or delivery of fuels Lack of Fuel 9131 Lack of fuel (interruptible supply of fuel part of fuel contract); If the operator elected to contract for fuels where the fuel (for example, natural gas) can be interrupted so that the fuel suppliers can sell the fuels to others (part of the plant fuel cost-saving measure), then the lack of fuel is under management control and is not applicable to this case. 5

LOLE Analysis Inputs and GADS Definitions Historic unit performance data from GADS used for LOLE analysis includes: Planned maintenance data (average number of events and duration) Generation verification test capability (GVTC) Monthly maximum output profile (net dependable capacity) Unit Forced Outage Rates Forced outage rate (FOR): A measure of the probability that a generating unit will not be available due to forced outages. Attaching the term equivalent to any rate or factor, e.g. equivalent forced outage rate (EFOR), indicates that both full outages and de-ratings have been considered in the calculation. The term demand applied to a rate, e.g. EFORd, indicates that the probability of an occurrence has been estimated for periods when the unit is in demand to generate. 6

GADS & LOLE Analysis Eq. 1 EFORd = (FOHd + EFDHd) / (SH + FOHd) EFORd = Equivalent Forced Outage Rate Demand FOHd = Forced Outage Hours Demand EFDHd = Equivalent Forced De-rated Hours Demand SH = Service Hours; the hours the unit is available for operation on an annual basis EFORd = Equivalent Forced Outage Rate Demand; a measure of the probability that a generating unit will not be available due to forced outages or forced de-ratings when there is demand on the unit to generate XEFORd = EFORd excluding causes of outages that are Outside Management Control (OMC) 7

GADS & LOLE Analysis Cont. Eq. 1 EFORd = (FOHd + EFDHd) / (SH + FOHd) Reserve Shutdown events count against Service Hours. Forced outages add to FOHd. Derates add to EFDHd. More time in Reserve Shutdown means fewer Service hours, and this translates to an increased impact on EFORd should an outage occur. 9130 (OMC) Lack of Fuel events count against Service Hours but do not add to Forced Outages. 9131 Lack of Fuel events count against Service Hours and add to Forced Outages. 8

Considerations EFORd is used in LOLE simulations to model unit forced outage rates. XEFORd (OMC events excluded) is used to determine the unforced capacity (UCAP) rating of each unit and summed per MISO zone to calculate the total UCAP megawatts, which is used in the PRM UCAP calculation. PRM UCAP feeds into the determination of the Planning Reserve Margin Requirement. 9

Considerations cont. Each Load Serving Entity has an obligation to meet Planning Reserve Margin Resource Requirements; if the LSE does not have enough capacity resources to meet its Requirement, it will have to procure (pay for) additional capacity resources. Capacity resources will receive payment commensurate with their ability to generate when dispatched, and the Forced Outage Rate serves as an input to the quantification of this ability. A higher Forced Outage Rate translates to lost earning potential in MISO s capacity market (capacity auction). 10

Considerations cont. Generators designated as Planning Resources are required to submit an offer into MISO s Day Ahead (DA) Energy Market unless they are on a scheduled outage. If a unit is selected through the Day Ahead process, it is obligated to run in Real Time. Units on Reserve Shutdown are considered on outage for this purpose and are not required to offer into DA. 11

Discussion Points MISO s current LOLE study methodology relies heavily upon GADS. A fundamental shift in unit performance will be reflected in GADS, over time. While the GADS Reserve Shutdown status offers cost savings for units that are not needed to meet demand and/or cannot be economically dispatched, it potentially also masks inability of resources to respond to a dispatch call from MISO. The extent to which GADS captures fuel risk impacts the extent to which MISO s LOLE analysis captures fuel risk. 12

Links NERC Generating Availability Data System Data Reporting Instructions http://www.nerc.com/pa/rapa/gads/datareportinginstructions/entire% 20GADS%20Data%20Reporting%20Instructions%20Effective%20Janu ary%201,%202012.pdf IEEE Standard Definitions for Use in Reporting Electric Generating Unit Reliability, Availability, and Productivity http://www.nerc.com/comm/pc/generating%20availability%20data%20 System%20Working%20Group/IEEE%20762-1%20Task%20Force%20(IEEE762TF)/762-2006.pdf MISO s 2013 LOLE Study Report https://www.misoenergy.org/library/repository/study/lole/2013%20l OLE%20Study%20Report.pdf 13

APPENDIX 14

2007-2011 MISO GADS Data for Lack of Fuel Events for Gas Units Cause Codes # of Times Used Duration (Hrs) Duration (EQ Hrs) Reduction (Avg MW) Loss (MWh) 9130 119 8,584 6,641 107 651,479 9131 49 1,786 1,357 128 394,097 15

NERC Recommendations for Future GADS Analysis Recommendations from 2013 NERC Report Special Reliability Assessment: Accommodating an Increased Dependence on Natural Gas for Electric Power (http://www.nerc.com/pa/rapa/ra/reliability%20assessments%20dl/nerc_phaseii_fi NAL.pdf) include: Perform deeper dive analysis to a sample of individual generator outages to determine the cause of the outage. GADS should be able to identify if generator outages were the result of either fuel contract interruptions or uncontrolled gas curtailment events. Overlay GADS outage data on pipeline capacity trends to determine if there is a correlation and identify potential leading indicators. Determine natural gas pipeline and supply conditions during times of gas generator outages. Perform a study to determine approaches where dispatch trends and load duration curves can provide insights to future generator performance. Use GADS data for probabilistic adequacy models and develop scenarios around increased forced outage rates 16