Literature Review The Environmental Concerns of Arsenic Additives in Poultry Litter

Similar documents
Vertical and Subsurfer Tillage Reduce Surface Runoff of Nutrients and Fecal Steroids from Poultry Litter- Amended Fields

Delmarva Land & Litter Challenge

Restoring the Water-Quality Conditions in the Chesapeake Bay: What is working and what still needs to be done

Understanding Nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Implications for Management and Restoration the EASTERN SHORE

THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS OF ARSENIC ADDITIVES IN POULTRY LITTER: LITERATURE REVIEW

Maryland s Regulatory Approach to Nutrient Management

Understanding Nutrients in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed and Implications for Management and Restoration the EASTERN SHORE

Chesapeake Bay Nitrogen Assessments

Nutrient Management for Water Quality Protection : A Case Study of Delaware

Permitting Animal Feeding Operations in Maryland

Fact Sheet. Chesapeake Bay Water Quality

Chesapeake Bay s Problems

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

Cover Crops and Soil Health Harvesting the Potential: Environmental Impacts of Cover Crops

to protect human health and the environment

Incorporating monitoring, modeling and trends analyses into management decisions: a Choptank River example

University of Maryland Phosphorus Management Tool (The Revised Maryland PSI)

Phosphorus Site Index Update University of Maryland Phosphorus Management Tool

Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting January 14, Bruce Michael Maryland Department of Natural Resources

AFOs, CAFOs and MAFOs

Ocean Water Quality Challenges

Ocean Pollution. Ocean Pollution

Understanding Nutrients and Their Affects on the Environment

Evolution of P-Loss Risk Assessment Tools

Full Title of Priority: Enhanced Analysis and Explanation of Water-Quality Data for the TMDL Mid-Point Assessment

OCEAN POLLUTION. Pollution of coastal waters near heavily populated areas is a serious problem.

Ecosystems: Nutrient Cycles

Management Modeling of Suspended Solids and Living Resource Interactions

Bill Crowell, PhD, AICP Lindsey Smart, MS. Chesapeake Bay Program Science & Technical Advisory Committee 18 March 2014

From My Backyard to Our Bay It s the 911 for the Chesapeake Bay

Where are Phosphorus Imbalances in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed?

Global Commitments to address the Nutrient Challenge. Anjan Datta GPNM Secretariat

Environmental Consideration of Dairy Systems

MANAGEMENT OF WATERFRONT PROPERTIES FOR HOMEOWNERS

POLICY FOR NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AREAS

Riparian Buffers and Stream Restoration

Science Enhanced Scope and Sequence Grade 6. Water Quality

Lecture 2: Water Pollution

The Chesapeake Bay Program

Overview of ATP-PA s Demonstration of a Patent-Pending Combined Remediation Biomass & Bio-Product Production (CRBBP) Process

MARYLAND ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER AGENCIES, INC. VIRGINIA ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL WASTEWATER AGENCIES, INC. M E M O R A N D U M

PHASE 6 COVER CROPS EXPERT PANEL

Sustainable Management of Organic Residuals & Agricultural Soil:

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard Baltimore MD

Observations on Nutrient Management and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL

STATE OF THE BAY IN 2012

The Impact of Nonpoint Source Contamination on the Surficial Aquifer of the Delmarva Peninsula

Chesapeake Bay Program in Pennsylvania. Karl G. Brown Executive Secretary PA State Conservation Commission

2017 Revised Guide for Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Two-year Milestones

Phosphorus Kyle Minks Land and Water Resources Scientist Land Conservation Division

Monday, January 9th, :00 pm. Montgomery Park, Lobby Conference Rooms

Chapter 6. Aquatic Biodiversity. Chapter Overview Questions

recycling in Oregon To learn more about biosolids recycling EC 1471 Reprinted February 2002

Functional Uplift Based Stream Assessment & Restoration Design

IV International Symposium Agrosym /AGSY S THE LEVEL OF POLLUTION FROM NUTRIENTS AND HUMAN EFFECTS ON DURRES BAY

Identifying and Integrating Priorities for Marine Conservation and Management

Membership-Phase 6 Cover Crop Panel

Statewide Results (Final Target)

Poultry in the Chesapeake Bay Program s Phase 6 Watershed Model

Innovative Agricultural Practices to Mitigate Groundwater Nutrient Contamination

Chapter 14. Water Pollution

Water Quality Analysis of Zinc and Lead in Bodkin Creek, Anne Arundel County, Maryland

Federal Storm Water Requirements

AP Environmental Science

Shenandoah River Fish Kill Investigation

Testimony of Shari T. Wilson, Secretary Maryland Department of the Environment. Before. The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works

Water Pollution. Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi/ Community Medicine

Understanding Agriculture And Clean Water

Restoring a National Treasure: Chesapeake Bay. Presented by Dan Nees, Director Environmental Finance Center University of Maryland April 27, 2007

MARYLAND NUTRIENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM

MD Nutrient Management Plans History, Requirements & Changes Over Time

Nutrients, Algal Blooms and Red Tides in Hong Kong Waters. Paul J. Harrison and Jie XU

Centre for Environmental Contaminants Research. CSIRO Land and Water

Improved Simulation of Soil and. Manure Phosphorus Loss in SWAT

Nitrogen Pollution and its Impacts

A Procedure for Developing Ecosystem Loading Limits (TMDLs) for Selenium in Watersheds Affected by Gold Mining in Northern Argentina

Redwood Shores Lagoon August Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

SOIL P-INDEXES: MINIMIZING PHOSPHORUS LOSS. D. Beegle, J. Weld, P. Kleinman, A. Collick, T. Veith, Penn State & USDA-ARS

Microplastics in the Chesapeake Bay and its Watershed: State of the Knowledge, Data Gaps, and Relationship to Management Goals

Addressing Variable Phosphorus Solubility of Amendments in the Watershed Model

Water for Virginia Master Naturalists. What are the types What is important to know about: Functions Values Issues

The Continued Maturation of Environmental Assessments Over the Last Two Decades: End-of-Pipe to Watershed Strategies

SUPPORTING CHESAPEAKE BAY RESTORATION BY MODELING NUTRIENT SOURCES AND TRANSPORT

Poultry Litter Use and Transport in Caroline, Queen Anne s, Somerset and Wicomico Counties in Maryland: A Summary Report

Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Water OW Perspective

Legacy P. Task 1: Search and Review of Existing Information. Task 2: Evaluation of Existing Information

Best Management Practices to Minimize Nutrient Losses from Manured Fields. Hailin Zhang. Oklahoma State University

Total Maximum Daily Load Development for Unnamed Tributary to Pitts Creek. Public Meeting March 26, Why Are We Here

-< ';. It's Your Bay Protect It! - ~ -~ -~"- ..., ~. - Virginia Cooperative Extension VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY

U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works. Hearing on The Impacts of Global Warming on the Chesapeake Bay. September 26, 2007

Guiding the Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay: The EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership. Keely Clifford U.S. Embassy Paris

Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in SPARROW Models Richard B. Alexander

Green Engineering. Harry R. Compton Environmental Engineer U.S. EPA - ERT

Redwood Shores Lagoon November 2016 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Gray s Creek. Gray s Creek

Redwood Shores Lagoon February 2019 Monthly Water Quality Monitoring Report

Maryland s Priority Listings. October 20, 22, 27, 2015

HOME PRACTICES TO PROMOTE WATER QUALITY

Proposed Data layers for PCB Resource Center

DC STORMWATER PLAN CONSOLIDATED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TDML) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

Transcription:

Literature Review The Environmental Concerns of Arsenic Additives in Poultry Litter Proposal for Harry R. Hughes Maryland Center for Agro-Ecology, Inc. May 5, 2011 Proposal period: May 15, 2011 December 1, 2011 Principal Investigator: Daniel J. Fisher, Ph.D., University of Maryland Email: dfisher2@umd.edu Co-Principal Investigators: Lance T. Yonkos, Ph.D., University of Maryland Email: lyonkos@umd.edu Kenneth W. Staver, Ph.D., University of Maryland Email: kstaver@umd.edu

Scope of Work Literature Review The Environmental Concerns of Arsenic Additives in Poultry Litter The Harry R. Hughes Center for Agro-Ecology, Inc. has asked our group at the Wye Research and Education Center to conduct a literature review requested by the Environmental Matters and Education and Health and Environmental Affairs committees of the Maryland General Assembly on the environmental concerns of arsenic additives in poultry litter. The letter of request for this work indicates that many of the committees members are satisfied with data indicating that consuming chicken produced using arsenical additives poses a minimal threat to human health when compared to many vegetables, fruits, and seafood.. As such, the concerns for arsenic addition to poultry feed have now shifted to environmental issues associated with agronomic handling of the resulting poultry litter. Since scientists at the Wye Research and Education Center specialize in research into environmental concerns of contaminants, and have a background investing agro-ecological interactions, we propose to conduct a literature review of these environmental aspects. We are not public health/human health experts and therefore cannot comment on concerns in these areas. Our literature review will examine all of the pertinent and available regional and national literature on the environmental concerns of arsenic as an additive in poultry litter. Our review will deal specifically with poultry litter, soils from poultry litter amended fields, near surface groundwater below these soils, and ecosystems that receive runoff from poultry litter amended fields. We will address these specific background questions asked by the committees: Does arsenic from poultry feed end up in poultry litter? If poultry litter contains arsenic, is it present in an organic or inorganic form? More complex questions concerning arsenic in the environment will also be addressed, including: When applied to agricultural fields, does arsenic accumulate in soils to a level of concern based on existing soil arsenic environmental soil criteria? 2

Does arsenic transport from litter amended surface soils into shallow near surface groundwaters and receiving ecosystems and, if so, are levels high enough to be of concern to the biota in these ecosystems based on existing arsenic environmental criteria? Are arsenic levels in sediments and biota of Chesapeake Bay at levels of environmental concern? What are background levels of arsenic in Maryland soils and what is the potential for arsenic in poultry litter to alter soil profile arsenic levels relative to other arsenic sources (e.g., natural sources, atmospheric deposition, biosolids application as fertilizer, etc.)? How are recent changes in phosphorus based nutrient management likely to change arsenic additions to Maryland cropland? In addition to conducting the review on existing scientific literature, where applicable, unpublished data from poultry litter-associated agronomic research at the Wye Research and Education Center will be included in the review. Lastly, we will analyze archived environmental samples from poultry litter amended fields for total arsenic and different arsenic chemical forms. These analyses will add information on the speciation and transport of arsenic from poultry litter amended fields. The literature review will be submitted to the Harry R. Hughes Maryland Center for Agro- Ecology, Inc. as a full report with an abstract and summary. The report will be submitted by December 1, 2011. 3

Biosketches Dr. Daniel Fisher is a Senior Research Scientist at the University of Maryland Wye Research and Education Center and in the University s Department of Environmental Science and Technology. He earned his Ph.D. in Marine Science/Aquatic Toxicology in 1986 from the College of William and Mary's Virginia Institute of Marine Science. He currently teaches courses at the University of Maryland in College Park concerned with Ecosystem Health and Protection and Environmental Toxicology. He has over thirty-nine years of experience in aquatic toxicology and the study of environmental impacts of contaminants. For 16 years Dr. Fisher directed the Maryland Department of the Environment's Bioassay Laboratory located at the (WREC) where he conducted acute and chronic whole effluent toxicity testing for NPDES compliance monitoring with freshwater and estuarine fish and invertebrates. In addition, he established freshwater and estuarine sediment toxicity testing capabilities at WREC that allow for sediment quality assessments. He has been the Principal Investigator or Co-PI for research grants and contracts in the following areas: aquatic toxicological studies in both the laboratory and field involving sediments, single compounds, mixtures, effluents and storm water runoff; ecological risk assessments involving the development of water quality criteria for numerous compounds; and continuous versus intermittent toxicity of chemicals. Dr. Fisher s recent work has been in the assessment of possible endocrine disruptive effects of land applied poultry litter and the possible development of antibiotic resistance in Eastern Shore streams from poultry litter and biosolids application. He has also just completed a multiyear project with the Maryland Department of the Environment concerned with the development of Sediment Quality Criteria for metals (e.g., lead and zinc) in Baltimore Harbor He has written more than 100 refereed journal and technical publications on a wide variety of environmental issues. Dr. Lance Yonkos is an Assistant Research Scientist at the University of Maryland. He has over twenty-six years of experience investigating point and non-point source pollution effects on the health of aquatic biota, particularly in Chesapeake Bay and its tributaries. Dr. Yonkos principle area of interest involves endocrine disruption as a consequence of environmental exposure to complex contaminant mixtures. His academic training is in natural sciences and mathematics (B.S.; Washington & Lee Univ.) and environmental sciences with emphasis on aquatic toxicology (M.S.; Ph.D.; Univ. of MD). Dr. Yonkos has worked continuously at the since 1990. Currently he serves as Principal or Co-Principal Investigator for laboratory and field projects aimed at determining the impact(s) of poultry manure-associated contaminants on fish and amphibians in Delmarva watersheds. Dr. Yonkos also has a faculty appointment with the College of Agriculture and Natural Resources - Environmental Science and Technology Department (ENST) where he teaches courses on environmental health, aquatic toxicology and contaminant related topics. He has 14 publications in refereed journals on a variety of environmental issues, has written 38 abstracts (30 as first author) and has presented extensively at national scientific meetings. 4

Dr. Ken Staver is an Associate Research Scientist at the University of Maryland Wye Research and Education Center. Since 1984, he has been conducting research on water, nutrient, contaminant, and energy flows in Coastal Plain watersheds. The emphasis of his work has been on the development of strategies to minimize negative environmental impacts of agricultural activities while maintaining agricultural productivity and enhancing soil and water resources. More recently, he has focused more on nutrient, contaminant and energy flows at larger scales, and the potential of biofuel production to increase overall nutrient use efficiency in agricultural systems and to reduce net carbon emissions. Dr. Staver has conducted extensive field studies since 1990 looking at the movement of nutrients in poultry litter and sewage sludge applied to cropland through both surface and subsurface flow paths. He collaborated with USGS scientists looking at the effect of arsenic in poultry litter on total and water-soluble soil arsenic pools. More recently, his research with Chesapeake Bay dredge material has considered the movement of arsenic and other metals when dredge material is placed in upland settings. His role in this project will be to evaluate the short-term dynamics of arsenic movement from cropland as a result of poultry litter applications and the long-term impacts of arsenic in poultry litter on soil and Chesapeake Bay sediment arsenic levels in comparison to other arsenic sources. 5