Technical Report 3. Alyssa Stangl Structural Option Advisor Dr. Linda Hanagan L A J O L L A C O M M O N S P H A S E I I O F F I C E T O W E R

Similar documents
La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL

Thesis Proposal. La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower San Diego, California. December 13, 2013

La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower

Table of Contents.2. Introduction...3 Gravity Loading and Deflections..4. Existing Structural System..8

Crossroads at Westfields Building II

Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Technical Report #2. Matthew R Peyton

Christopher McCune Structural Option 2006 Senior Thesis Penn State Architectural Engineering. Eight Tower Bridge Conshohocken, Pennsylvania

Temecula Medical Center Temecula, CA

THE FORENSIC MEDICAL CENTER

Dead Loads (psf): Concrete Floor Slab on Metal Deck 45 psf Mechanical and Ceiling 7 psf Miscellaneous 5 psf Exterior Wall 80 psf

OVERALL STRUCTURAL SYSTEM

Alexis Pacella Structural Option Dr. Schneider Lexington II, Washington D.C. Technical Report #2 October 31,

Traci Peterson Option: Structural Faculty Consultant: Memari. Executive Summary

181 Fremont San Francisco, CA. Tech Report 3 10/17/2014. PSUAE Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Thomas Boothby

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

Best Buy Corporate Building D (4) Richfield, MN

Pro-Con Structural Study for Alternative Floor Systems October 27, 2004

Erie on the Park. Timothy Moore Penn State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Prof. Ali Memari

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

Software Verification

TECHNICAL REPORT II STRUCTURAL STUDY OF ALTERNATE FLOOR SYSTEMS

Hilton Baltimore Convention Center Hotel Western Podium

Lateral System Analysis and Confirmation Design

[TECHNICAL REPORT II:]

David A. Walenga Technical Assignment #2

Structural Option Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA

Third Avenue New York, NY. Structural Concepts/ Structural Existing Conditions Report September 30, Michelle L.

Xyston Inn. NY. Proposal. Xiaodong Jiang. Structure Option. Advisor: Dr. Linda Hanagan

Technical Report 1 Bed Tower Addition at Appleton Medical Center Appleton, WI

Kaleida Health Global Heart and Vascular Institute University at Buffalo CTRC/Incubator. Buffalo, New York. Technical Report #2

Technical Report #1. Indiana Regional Medical Center Indiana, PA. Cody A. Scheller. Structural Concepts & Existing Conditions Report

Hershey Research Park Building One. Technical Report 2. Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan 10/12/12

MITRE 3 Building McLean VA

Park Potomac Office Building E

111 MORGAN ST. Ryan Friis

Structural Technical Report #2 Pro/Con Study of Alternate Floor Systems

C H A N T I L L Y, V A

ORANGE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

Thesis Proposal. Matthew R Peyton

The Towers at the City College of New York. Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari

Caitlin Ferrell Structural Option Dr. Boothby, AE Faculty Consultant. Erie Convention Center and Sheraton Hotel

Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD. Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option

Thesis Proposal 12/13/06

Technical Report #1. Matthew R Peyton

Structural Option April 7 th, 2010

Structural Technical Report I October 5, 2006 Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions Report

Structural Tech Report #2 Pro Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Jonathan R. Torch Technical Report 2 Columbia University. Technical Report 2. Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

Table of Contents 2. Structural Systems.4 Foundations.4 Floor System...4 Columns..5 Lateral System...5

Office Building-G. Thesis Proposal. Carl Hubben. Structural Option. Advisor: Dr. Ali Memari

THE PLAZA AT PPL CENTER HAMILTON BOULEVARD AT 9 TH STREET - ALLENTOWN, PA

Franklin Square Hospital Center Patient Tower

HIGH RISE CONDO SOHO, NEW YORK, NY

VARIOUS TYPES OF SLABS

Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Camden, NJ

200 Minuteman Drive. New Design for Additional Floors and Vibration Sensitive Equipment. Brent Ellmann. Structural Option

1000 CONNECTICUT AVENUE

Danielle Shetler - Structural option Courtyard by Marriott Lancaster, PA

The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Center Mercy Hospital Medical Office Building Baltimore, MD. Thesis Proposal

2011 Technical Assignment 2 Thomas J Kleinosky Structural Option Patient Care Pavilion; Albany, NY 10/19/2011 Advisor: Dr. Hanagan

David A. Walenga Technical Assignment #1

Technical Report 2: Pro-Con Structural Study of Alternate Floor Systems

151 First Side. Technical Assignment 2 November 16 th, William J. Buchko. AE 481w Senior Thesis The Pennsylvania State University

Nasser Marafi. Alternate Floor Systems. Pro Con Structural Study of. Technical Report 2. Center & Facility Service Building

Project. San Jose City College Physical Education Building. Prepared For. Prepared By PLACE IMAGE HERE. Ken Bauer, AIA Principal

Structural Redesign Gravity System

Lecture-06 Analysis and Design of Slab Systems

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

FDA CDRH Laboratory Silver Spring, Maryland. Executive Summary: Timothy Mueller Structural Option Walter Schneider

STRUCTURAL TECHNICAL REPORT 1

John Jay College Expansion Project

Structural System. Design Criteria Fire Resistance Concrete designed for 2 HR rating (worst case) Geotechnical Report Allowable Bearing Capacity

Earth and Engineering Sciences Building University Park, Pennsylvania

The Structural Redesign of Boyds Bear Country and its Related Systems. Boyds Bear Country, Pigeon Forge, Tennessee

U.S. Pharmacopeia Headquarters Consolidation. Rockville, MD

Analysis and Design of One-way Slab System (Part-I)

Earth and Engineering Sciences Building

Global Village Rochester Institute of Technology Rochester, New York

Eric Alwine Structural Option George Read Hall The University of Delaware Dr. Boothby Technical Assignment #2 October 31, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

ARCHITECTURAL ENGINEERING THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERISITY THESIS PROJECT

Brent Ellmann Structural Option 200 Minuteman Park, Andover, MA Structural Consultant: Dr. Hanagan

MCEER Hospital Demonstration Project

TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER PRESENTATION OUTLINE

Technical Report #3. Matthew R Peyton

Technical Report #2 10/26/06

TECHNICAL REPORT 1. Structural Concepts / Structural Existing Conditions. Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children s Hospital. Hershey, Pennsylvania

FDA OC/ORA Office Building

Trump Taj Mahal Hotel

SENIOR THESIS PROPOSAL STRUCTURAL REDESIGN USING STEEL FRAMING

TECHNICAL REPORT 2. Dominick Lovallo Dr. Hanagan Advisor The Pennsylvania State University. Embassy Suites Hotel, Springfield Virginia

TECHNICAL ASSIGNMENT 1 STRUCTURAL CONCEPTS/STRUCTURAL EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

BWI Hilton Hotel. Thomas Sabol The Pennsylvania State University Architectural Engineering Structural Emphasis Advisor: Dr. Ali M.

Biobehavioral Health Building

House of Sweden. Structural Study of Alternative Floor Systems K St. NW Washington, DC 20007

Hyatt Place North Shore. Pittsburgh, PA T. Technical Assignment #2. Kyle Tennant. Kyle Tenn. Structural (IP) [Type the document subtitle]

From Park and Gamble Book.

John Hopkins Graduate Student Housing. Technical Report North Wolfe Street Baltimore, Maryland Brad Oliver Structural Advisor: Professor Memari

Transcription:

Technical Report 3 Alyssa Stangl Structural Option Advisor Dr. Linda Hanagan L A J O L L A C O M M O N S P H A S E I I O F F I C E T O W E R

Site and Location La Jolla Commons, San Diego, California

General Building Information La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower Height 198 8 (13 stories) Square Footage 462,301 GSF Location San Diego, California Seismic Design Category D Office Building Multi-tenant capabilities First Class A NetZero Office Building in the USA Special Features Underfloor Air Distribution System 15 foot cantilevers at both ends

Typical Floor Plan 315 ft 128 ft North

Existing Structural System Mild reinforced, cast-in-place concrete structure Mat Foundation Thickness ranges from 3 ft to 6.5 ft Gravity System Two-way, flat plate, reinforced concrete slab supported by a rectangular grid of concrete columns Slab camber Spandrel beam around slab edge Lateral System Specially reinforced concrete shear walls Collector beams in NS direction - levels below grade Special Features 15 foot cantilevers at the North and South ends Steel framed mechanical penthouse

Typical Bay and Columns

Typical Bay - Details 14 inch two-way slab 30 ft x 42 ft from centerline to centerline of columns 2 ¼ camber at mid-span 24 x 24 columns (at exterior) 18 spandrel beam, 4.5 feet wide Column strip and middle strip called out C.S. M.S. C.S.

Gravity Spot Checks: Punching Shear Deflection Control: Table 9.5(c) - ACI 318-11 h min = 14.4 < h provided = 14 FAILED! (camber used) Punching Shear Edge Column K1 Punching shear critical section through h=18 Φ Vc = 358k > Vu=187k OK! PASSED! Punching Shear Interior Column E4 Punching shear critical section through h=14 Φ Vc = 481.8k > Vu=427.6k OK! PASSED!

Gravity Spot Checks: One-Way Shear G1 One-Way Shear - 30 direction: Shear through h=18 Φ Vc = 643k > Vu=144k OK! PASSED! One-Way Shear 15 10 direction: Shear through h=18 Φ Vc = 340k > Vu=80k OK! PASSED! 30 G1 15 10

Gravity Spot Checks: Moment Capacity Moment Capacity Column Line K: K Checks failed when column strip and middle strip were analyzed separately @M+ Middle Strip: 693 ft-k >> Mn=573.6 ft-k Column strip and middle strip were combined for moment capacity checks @ Mu+ = 1155 ft-kl < Mn=1113 ft-k @ Mu- Interior Column= 1555 ft-k < Mn = 1630 ft-k @ Mu- Exterior Column= 578 ft-k < Mn = 1039 ft-k PASSED!

Gravity Spot Checks: Moment Capacity Moment Capacity Column Line 1: Check of M u - of Combined C.S. and M.S. M u - =512 ft-k > Mn=426 ft-k However, edge beam was not accounted for most likely would pass if this was included in analysis 1 Check of M u + of Combined C.S. and M.S. M u + =276ft-k >> Mn=715 ft-k PASSED!

Gravity Spot Checks: Summary Check Two-Way Shear One-Way Shear Moment Capacity Status Pass Pass Pass (if combined)

Alternate Floor System Designs Floor System Design #1: Non-Composite Steel Floor System Design #2: Composite Steel Floor System Design #3: One Way Concrete Slab

Alternate Design 1: Non-Composite Steel

Alternate Design 1: Non-Composite Steel Increase in overall system depth Original: 18 maximum slab thickness New: 30 beam depth + 6.5 slab = 36.5 Cost using R.S. Means Assembly B1010 254 $38.19/SF System Weight 80.6 PSF Fire Protection/Fire ratings Fireproofing required on beams & bottom of deck 4.5 topping for 2 hr fire rating Durability This assembly is used often in office spaces and can handle the normal wear and tear of this occupancy

Alternate Design 1: Non-Composite Steel Lateral System Options: (seismic detailing) Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Efficient, laid out in existing system at elevator and stair core Steel Moment Frame Integrate around exterior in conjunction with core shear walls for additional stiffness Not efficient alone Conclusion: Viable Option Will integrate well with architecture Options for lateral systems will work for high seismic loading Lighter than existing system Steel Braced Frame Braces would obstruct office space and/or facade.

Alternate Design 2: Composite Steel

Alternate Design 2: Composite Steel Increase in overall system depth Original: 18 maximum slab thickness New: 30 beam depth + 6.5 slab = 36.5 Cost using R.S. Means Assembly B1010 256 $25.50/SF System Weight 79.3 PSF Fire Protection/Fire ratings Fireproofing required on beams & bottom of deck 4.5 topping for 2 hr fire rating Durability This assembly is used often in office spaces and can handle the normal wear and tear of this occupancy

Alternate Design 2: Composite Steel Lateral System Options: (seismic detailing) Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Efficient, laid out in existing system at elevator and stair core Steel Moment Frame Integrate around exterior in conjunction with core shear walls for additional stiffness Not efficient alone Conclusion: Viable Option Will integrate well with architecture Could possibly control depth with heavier beams Currently the lightest system Cheaper than non-composite steel Several lateral system options Steel Braced Frame Braces would obstruct office space and/or facade

Alternate Design 3: One-Way Slab System Notes: 1. 4000 PSI, Normal Weight Concrete 2. Rebar f y =60 ksi and f yt = 60ksi

Alternate Design 3: One-Way Slab System Increase in overall system depth Original: 18 maximum slab thickness New: 41 girder depth Cost using R.S. Means Assembly B1010 256 $23.89/SF System Weight 215.4 PSF Fire Protection/Fire ratings Fireproofing not required but minimum rebar cover must be met Fire rating Meets at least 2 hr requirement Durability This system can be very durable and has proven endurance in office spaces

Alternate Design 3: One-Way Slab System Lateral System Options: (seismic detailing required) Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Efficient, laid out in existing system at elevator and stair core Concrete Moment Frame Relatively inefficient compared to shear walls Potentially integrate with shear wall system Conclusion: Not a Viable Option High beam depths will significantly decrease floor to ceiling height Beams were designed as b=4/5d Heaviest system Steel Frames NOT ADVISED

Floor System Comparison Gravity Floor Systems Considerations Flat-Plate Concrete Slab Non-Composite Steel Composite Steel One-Way Concrete Slab Architectural Considerations Maximum Depth 18" 36.5" 36.5" 41" Fire Protection Required? No Yes Yes No 2 hr Fire Rating achieved? Yes Yes Yes Yes System Statistics Cost Per Square Foot $21.53/SF $38.19/SF $25.50/SF $23.89/SF System Weight 180.4 PSF 80.6 PSF 79.8 PSF 215.4 PSF Durability Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Acceptable Future Design Considerations Lateral System Options Advantages Disadvantages Reinforced Concrete Shear Walls Yes Yes Yes Yes Steel Moment Frame No Yes Yes No Steel Braced Frame No No No No Concrete Moment Frame No No No Yes Maximum floor to ceiling heights, cheapest system, no fire protection required None Light system weight, several options for lateral system Most expensive system, fire protection required, large beam depth, fire protection required, Vibrations Lightest system weight, several options for lateral system, system used in LJC Tower I Higher cost than concrete systems, large beam depth, fire protection required, vibrations Same material as existing system, cheapest of alternative systems Heaviest system, large beam depth will significantly decrease floor to ceiling height Viable Option? N/A Yes Yes No

Any Questions? La Jolla Commons Phase II Office Tower