INTEGRATION OF THE LOCAL MITIGATION STRATEGY INTO THE LOCAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Executive Summary

Executive Summary The experiences of the 2004 Hurricane Season epitomize the importance of better integrating hazard mitigation activities into local comprehensive planning. Last fall, residents from all over the state experienced significant damages from Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Jeanne, and Ivan by either winds, tornadoes, surge, or flooding. But this wasn t the only time we ve experienced natural disasters, nor will it be the last. In 1992, Hurricane Andrew devastated South Florida. In 1998 and 1999, most counties in Florida experienced wildfires. In some cases, despite fire fighters best efforts, the fires advanced through neighborhoods and homes were loss. Every year in Central Florida, new sinkholes emerge swallowing homes and damaging infrastructure. The cost of recovery for these various disasters ranges from hundreds of thousands to billions of dollars, significantly taxing local, state, and federal financial sources. Losses covered through federal funding as a result of the 2004 hurricanes alone could reach as high as $7 billion. Worst of all, however, are the many lives that, directly or indirectly, are lost due to natural disasters. It is imperative that we reduce the human and financial costs of natural disasters. Through better integration of natural hazard considerations into local comprehensive planning, we can build safer communities. This profile of Levy County has been prepared as part of a statewide effort by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) to guide local governments on integrating hazard mitigation principles into local comprehensive plans. Through the process outlined in this profile, planners will be able to (1) convey Levy County s existing and potential risk to identified hazards; (2) assess how well local hazard mitigation principles have been incorporated into the County s Comprehensive Plan; (3) provide recommendations on how hazard mitigation can better be integrated into the Comprehensive Plan; and (4) determine if any enhancements could be made to the to better support comprehensive planning. Best available statewide level data is provided to convey exposure and risk, as well as, illustrate the vulnerability assessment component of the integration process. In this profile, we present an argument for why hazard mitigation needs to be a part of comprehensive planning through an examination of population growth, the hazards that the county is at risk from, the special needs population and structures that could be affected by these hazards, and the distribution of existing and future land uses in different hazard areas. We hope that this analysis will serve as an example of the issues each jurisdiction should consider as they update their plans to include hazard mitigation. The profile also contains a review of the and the Comprehensive Plan. Based on the analysis and review, we were able to develop specific options for the County on how to incorporate more hazard mitigation into the Comprehensive Plan and how to enhance the so that it is also a better tool for local planners. During our review, we found that Levy County had many strengths regarding hazard mitigation in both its and Comprehensive Plan and these are outlined in the profile. There are always ways to further strengthen such plans, however,, and the following is a summary of some of the options that would enable the County to do so. General Recommendations The is a strong hazard mitigation tool and can be utilized when analyzing Comprehensive Plan amendments and land use decisions. Currently, the Comprehensive Plan does reference the CEMP and the but does not refer to their use in Comprehensive Planning. Better integration of and Comprehensive Plan policies can improve the County's overall hazard mitigation strategy. The Levy County Comprehensive Plan can prioritize hazard mitigation initiatives found in the through the 5-year Capital Improvements Schedule. Criteria used to prioritize Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS ii

projects in the Capital Improvement Schedule can include dimensions that involve hazard mitigation. By prioritizing hazard mitigation initiatives in the Capital Improvements Schedule, the goals may be reached by securing funds and provide a timeframe for actions. The County can support educational programs that provide hazard mitigation information to the public, the business community, and to government personnel. Programs and information on hurricane preparedness, evacuation routes and shelter locations, flood hazard mitigation, the retrofitting of reoccurring loss structures, and wildfire mitigation programs can promote the hazard mitigation strategy of the County. Education and outreach programs may help create a better informed community and reduce risk to life and property. The County can educate local site plan reviewers on the importance of flood, wildfire, and sinkhole mitigation as well as the strategies used to reduce the vulnerability. Plan reviewers could then promote these ideas to local developers and explain their importance during the site plan review process. County personnel can incorporate hazard mitigation issues into existing operations as well as develop new initiatives. The County can adopt a policy that creates a Hurricane Evacuation Clearance Time Level of Service standard. A Hurricane Evacuation Clearance Time Level of Service standard can act as a quantitative measurement of evacuation route capacity and be used as a goal for providing a safe evacuation. The County can also adopt a Comprehensive Plan policy that continues to support and coordinate evacuations with the Withlacoochee Regional Evacuation Plan. Evacuations often occur on regional levels and on routes shared by numerous jurisdictions. Coordination with the regional evacuation plan may ensure a safe and timely evacuation as well as address regional needs. Like the, the Comprehensive Plan can adopt policies that support maintaining evacuation routes and address deficiencies of road conditions. Like most Counties in Florida, Levy County has a deficient amount of shelter capacity. Levy County can continue to cooperate with neighboring jurisdictions and the Withlacoochee Regional Planning Council to address local and regional evacuation shelter needs. The County could explore alternatives for evacuation shelters including the use or retrofit of existing public facilities as shelters or the promotion of safe rooms outside hazard areas. Also, the County may create and emergency shelter capacity Level of Service to measure improvements to capacity. The County has many existing measures that serve to mitigate the impacts of hazards, but they have not been identified as beneficial in this area. Current growth management techniques such as the land conservation, land acquisition, and the enforcement of land regulation through the Land Development Code are employed to protect natural resources but also mitigate the effects of natural disasters. The County can update these policies in the Comprehensive Plan and emphasize the benefits of hazard mitigation. Also, the County can explore the use of TDR to encourage development outside of high hazard areas and away from natural resources. Sinkhole Hazards Karst sensitive areas are addressed in the Comprehensive Plan and identified before development. The County can continue supporting the collection of data used to identify these hazards and explore the use of overlay districts or preservation zones in karst sensitive areas. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS iii

Wildfire Hazards The County can explore the adoption of firewise building code requirements for defined high fire risk areas to reduce wildfire risk in the County. As population is expected to increase in the immediate future, there is opportunity to develop neighborhoods and commercial properties using a code that may reduce property loss due to wildfire. The County can promote native vegetation and defensible space in high fire risk areas. This can act as a natural buffer and reduce the spread of wildfire. Also, the County can encourage the removal of wildfire fuel sources near structures, especially in rural areas. Coastal Hazards The County can explore the use of TDR of Environmentally Sensitive Lands and highhazard areas in order to promote development away from natural hazard areas. This approach can also encourage a more compact and contiguous urban form as well as protect natural resources that may reduce the risk of natural disasters. Flooding Hazards The County can encourage and or assist in retrofit, relocation, acquisition or demolition of repetitive loss structures. The County can provide information on retrofitting options and assistance programs for repetitive loss properties. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS iv

Table of Contents Executive Summary... 1. County Overview... 2. Hazard Vulnerability... 3. Existing Mitigation Measures... 4. Comprehensive Plan Review... 5. Recommendations... 6. Sources... Attachments... i 1 2 9 12 13 29 Attachment A: Maps of the Existing and Future Land Uses within the Coastal Hazard Zone and the Hurricane Vulnerability Zone... A-1 Attachment B: Maps of the Existing and Future Land Uses within the 100-year Floodplain... B-1 Attachment C: Maps of the Existing and Future Land Uses within Wildfire Susceptible Areas... C-1 Attachment D: Maps of the Existing and Future Land Uses within Potential Sinkhole Hazard Areas... D-1 Attachment E: Levy County Local Mitigation Strategy Goals and Objectives... E-1 Attachment F: Levy County Comprehensive Plan Excerpts Related to Hazard Mitigation... F-1 Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS v

1. County Overview Geography and Jurisdictions Levy County is located along the western coast of North-Central Florida. It covers a total of 1,118 square miles with an average population density of 30.8 people per square mile (U.S. Census, 2000). There are eight incorporated municipalities within the County, and these are listed in Table 1.1. Population and Demographics Official 2004 population estimates for all jurisdictions within Levy County, as well as, the percent change from the 2000 U.S. Census are presented in Table 1.1. The most current estimated countywide population of Levy is 37,486 people (University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, 2004). The most populated city in the County is Williston but 75.4% of the countywide population lives in the unincorporated portion of the County. Between 1990 and 2000, Levy County as a whole had a growth rate of 32.9%, which is greater than the statewide growth rate of 23.5% in those 10 years. Table 1.1 Population Estimates by Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Population, Census 2000 Population Estimate, 2004 % Change, 2000-2004 % of Total Population (2004) Unincorporated 25,701 28,263 10.0% 75.4% Bronson 964 987 2.4% 2.6% Cedar Key 790 849 7.5% 2.3% Chiefland 1,993 2,031 1.9% 5.4% Fanning Springs (part) 464 553 19.2% 1.5% Inglis 1,491 1,637 9.8% 4.4% Otter Creek 121 137 13.2% 0.4% Williston 2,297 2,327 1.3% 6.2% Yankeetown 629 702 11.6% 1.9% Countywide Total 34,450 37,486 8.8% 100.0% Source: University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, 2004. According to the University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research (2004), Levy County s population is projected to grow steadily for the next 30 years, reaching 57,500 people by the year 2030. Figure 1.1 illustrates medium population projections for Levy County based on 2004 calculations. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 1

Figure 1.1 Medium Population Projections for Levy County, 2010-2030 60,000 Population 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0 2000 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 Year Source: University of Florida, Bureau of Economic and Business Research, 2004. Of particular concern within Levy County s population are those persons with special needs and/or limited resources such as the elderly, disabled, low-income, or language-isolated residents. According to the 2000 U.S. Census, 17.9% of Levy County residents are listed as 65 years old or over, 26.0% are listed as having a disability, 18.6% are listed as below poverty, and 6.1% live in a home with a primary language other than English. 2. Hazard Vulnerability Hazards Identification The highest risk natural hazards for Levy County are hurricanes, flooding, wildfires, and sinkholes. The Levy County does not rank these natural hazards in priority order but does provide a qualitative assessment based on historical records. The lists past hurricane events dating back to 1906. It also claims no hurricane winds over 100 mps has occurred in the County in recorded history. Storm surge associated with hurricanes and tropical storms threaten the County due to low-lying coastal areas. Hurricane force winds are also a concern due to the presence of mobile homes in vulnerable areas. Flooding occurs seasonally along the Suwannee, Waccasassa, and Withlacoochee Rivers. Much of Levy County was declared a federal disaster site due to flooding after the El Nino event in 1998. Wildfire also threatens much of the County. The states the County is 2/3 forested lands and largely rural in form. It states that between 2003 and 2004 there were 85 fires that burned 411 acres in the County. Sinkholes are present in the County, primarily around the Chiefland area but pose little immediate danger. Hazards Analysis The following analysis looks at four major hazard types: hurricanes and tropical storms (specifically surge), flooding, sinkholes, and wildfire. All of the information in this section, except the evacuation and shelter estimates, was obtained through the online Mapping for Emergency Management, Parallel Hazard Information System (MEMPHIS). MEMPHIS was designed to provide a variety of hazard related data in support of the Florida Local Mitigation Strategy DMA2K revision project. It was created by Kinetic Analysis Corporation (KAC) under contract with the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). Estimated exposure values were determined using the Category 3 Maxima Scenario for storm surge, FEMA s designated 100-year flood zones (A, AE, V, VE, AO, 100 IC, IN, AH), levels of concern 5 through 9 for wildfire, and high through adjacent zones for sinkholes. Storm surge exposure data is a subset of flood exposure, therefore, the storm surge results are also included in the flood results. For more details on a Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 2

particular hazard or an explanation of the MEMPHIS methodology, consult the MEMPHIS Web site (http://lmsmaps.methaz.org/lmsmaps/index.html) or your countywide. Existing Population at Risk Table 2.1 presents the countywide population at risk from hazards, as well as a breakdown of the sensitive needs populations at risk. The first column in the table summarizes the residents of Levy County that live within Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map zones, which signify special flood hazard areas. According to these maps, 22.7% of the population, or 7,828 people, are within the 100-year flood zone. A majority of those at risk of flooding are either elderly and/or disabled. In Levy County, sinkholes are also a risk, with 7% of the population within a high- to adjacent-risk sinkhole zone. Wildfire is a major hazard of concern to the County, with 50% of the population living within medium- to high-risk wildfire zones. Thirtysix percent of those at risk from wildfire are disabled, making a quick evacuation difficult. The last column represents those people in the County at risk from hurricane-related surge. Only 3.9% of the countywide population would be at risk from surge due to a Category 3 hurricane. All of the residents at risk from surge, though, would be encouraged to evacuate or go to a County shelter. Table 2.1 Estimated Number of Persons at Risk from Selected Hazards Population Flood Sinkhole (highadjacent risk) Wildfire (medium-high risk) Surge Minority 480 882 3,610 35 Over 65 1,517 454 2,865 359 Disabled 3,667 1,591 8,387 526 Poverty 1,105 889 3,619 167 Language Isolated 66 148 178 0 Single Parent 414 280 1,258 84 Countywide Total 7,828 2,498 17,519 1,171 Source: Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2005a. Evacuation and Shelters As discussed in the previous sections, population growth in Levy County has been steady, and this trend is projected to continue. As the population increases in the future, the demand for shelter space and the length of time it takes to evacuate the County is only going to increase. Currently, evacuation clearance times for Levy County are estimated to be 14.5 hours for Category 3 through 5 hurricanes, as shown in Table 2.2. This data was derived from 11 regional Hurricane Evacuation Studies that have been produced by FEMA, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Florida Regional Planning Councils. The study dates range from 1995 to 2004 and are updated on a rotating basis. According to Rule 9J-5, counties must maintain or reduce hurricane evacuation times. Some experts have suggested that counties should try to achieve 12 hours or less clearance time for a Category 3 hurricane. This is due to the limited amount of time between the National Hurricane Center issuing a hurricane warning and when the tropical stormforce winds make landfall. Levy County is just a little above this recommendation for now, but with continued growth and the limited road network of the region, it will be difficult to maintain or decrease this evacuation time. Additionally, storm events requiring evacuation typically impact larger areas, often forcing multiple counties to issue evacuation orders and placing a greater number of evacuees on the major roadways, further hindering evacuation progress. Thus, it is important to not only consider evacuation times for Levy County, but also for other counties in the region as shown in Table 2.2. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 3

Table 2.2 County Evacuation Clearance Times in Hours (High Tourist Occupancy, Medium Response) County Category 1 Hurricane Category 2 Hurricane Category 3 Hurricane Category 4 Hurricane Category 5 Hurricane Citrus 9.75 12 12 19 19 Lake NA NA NA NA NA Levy 7.75 7.75 14.5 14.5 14.5 Marion NA NA NA NA NA Sumter 8 10 12 16 20 NA=Not Available Note: Best available data as of 7/05 Source: State of Florida, 2005 (some counties may be in the process of determining new clearance times) Coupled with evacuation is the need to provide shelters. If adequate space can be provided in safe shelters for Levy County residents, then this could be a partial solution to the ever-increasing clearance times for evacuation. Currently, the State Shelter Plan reports that there is space for 2,455 people in the County s shelters, and there are 2,731 more people that will need sheltering in the case of a Category 5 hurricane. It is projected that by 2009 the deficit will increase to 3,390 people in need of space (FDCA, 2004). The County will need to address this deficiency but might also try to decrease the demand for public shelters by encouraging new homes to be built with safe rooms if they are outside of flood and surge zones. Residents who are further inland in the County and not in a flood zone could shelter in place if they had a safe room that could withstand hurricane-force winds. Safe rooms could at least be a last option for residents who cannot evacuate in time, especially in the case of a tornado. Existing Built Environment While the concern for human life is always highest in preparing for a natural disaster, there also are large economic impacts to local communities, regions, and even the State when property damages are incurred. To be truly sustainable in the face of natural hazards, we must work to protect the residents and also to limit, as much as possible, property losses that slow down a community s ability to recover from a disaster. Table 2.3 presents estimates of the number of buildings in Levy County by structure type that are at risk from each of the four hazards being analyzed. Flooding is the largest risk to property in the County, with 18,971 structures within a flood zone. According to the latest National Flood Insurance Program Repetitive Loss Properties list, there are 13 homes in unincorporated Levy County that have had flood damage multiple times and received insurance payments. There also are 1,373 structures at risk from surge. A total of 47% of the structures at risk from surge are single-family homes. Typically, structures at risk from surge are high-value real estate due to their proximity to the ocean. Table 2.3 also shows 2,391 structures within high to adjacent-risk sinkhole areas. Another major risk for property in the County is wildfire. There are 15,839 structures within medium to high-risk wildfire zones with 31.5% being single-family homes. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 4

Table 2.3 Estimated Number of Structures at Risk from Selected Hazards Structure Type Flood Sinkhole (highadjacent risk) Wildfire (medium- high risk) Surge Single-Family Homes 7,982 785 4,990 647 Mobile Homes 2,489 656 4,657 192 Multi-Family Homes 1,503 164 840 176 Commercial 1,636 356 952 99 Agriculture 4,240 121 2,223 152 Gov./Institutional 1,121 309 2,177 107 Total 18,971 2,391 15,839 1,373 Source: Florida Department of Community Affairs, 2005a. In addition to understanding exposure, risk assessment results must also be considered for prioritizing and implementing hazard mitigation measures. The risk assessment takes into account not only the people and property in a hazard area, but also the probability of occurrence that is necessary to understand the impacts to people and property. Although people and property are exposed to hazards, losses can be greatly reduced through building practices, land use, and structural hazard mitigation measures. The next section of this report examines the existing and future land use acreage in hazard areas. This information can be useful in considering where to implement risk reducing comprehensive planning measures. Analysis of Current and Future Vulnerability The previous hazards analysis section discussed population and existing structures at risk from flooding, sinkholes, wildfire, and surge according to MEMPHIS estimates. This section is used to demonstrate the County s vulnerabilities to these hazards spatially and in relation to existing and future land uses. The FDCA has provided maps of existing land use within hazard areas based on the 2004 County Property Appraiser geographic information system (GIS) shapefiles. Maps of future land uses in hazard areas were developed using the Levy County future land use map dated March 1994. In Attachment A, four maps show the existing and future land uses within the coastal hazard zone (Category 1 storm surge zone) and the hurricane vulnerability zone (Category 1 evacuation zone). The affected area for the coastal hazard and hurricane vulnerability zones is mostly west of Highways 18 and 19. Table 2.4 presents the acres of land in the coastal hazard zone and in the hurricane vulnerability zone. Eighty-nine percent of the land in the coastal hazard zone and 86.3% of the land in the hurricane vulnerability zone are either used for agriculture or parks and conservation. This is very positive for the County since a large portion of these hazard areas is being conserved or has not yet been developed, thereby giving the County opportunities to limit the amount of people needing evacuation or shelter and the amount of property damage that can occur from a hurricane. Table 2.5 presents future land use estimates and a breakdown of how currently undeveloped land has been designated for future use. Of the 16,436 vacant acres in the coastal hazard zone, 89.2% are designated for agricultural purposes in the future. The same is true with the hurricane vulnerability zone acres- 86.6% of the 32,246 vacant acres in this zone are also designated for agriculture. In Attachment B, two maps present the existing and future land uses within a 100-year flood zone. There are large swaths of flood-prone areas scattered across the County; however, a majority of them are west of Highway 27 where there are many wetlands. The total amount of land in these special flood hazard areas is 692,348 acres countywide. As shown in Table 2.4, only 11.7% of these acres are currently undeveloped, however, a majority of the flood prone land Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 5

is in parks and conservation or agricultural uses. Table 2.5 shows that 76.4% of the undeveloped lands are designated for future agricultural use. Again it is good to keep these hazard acres as undeveloped as possible to keep the County s vulnerability low. In Attachment C, maps present the land uses associated with high-risk wildfire zones. These wildfire risk areas are scattered across the County, although most of the larger swaths are on the western side of the County. A total of 31.6% of the land within these wildfire zones is currently vacant and another 42.3% is used for agriculture, as shown in Table 2.4. Of those 30,713 undeveloped acres, 66.3% is designated for agricultural uses in the future but 27.4% is also designated for use as estate (Table 2.5). If homes are built in these risk areas, Levy s vulnerability to wildfire hazards will greatly increase, especially since estate land uses will most likely involve large lots that will retain the vegetative fuels that make the area vulnerable to wildfire. Attachment D includes maps of potential sinkhole areas in the County. Most of the areas at risk from sinkholes are around Chiefland and Fanning Springs due to the karst foundation of these areas. Again, though a large portion of the sinkhole hazard area is being used for agriculture, 71% is still vacant. (Table 2.4). Of the undeveloped land at risk, 57.6%, or 1,273 acres, are designated for future use as agriculture as shown in Table 2.5. If the County sticks to these plans for future land use then they will be doing well to keep people and property out of harms way. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 6

Table 2.4 Total Unincorporated Acres in Hazard Areas by Existing Land Use Category Agriculture Existing Land Use Category Attractions, Stadiums, Lodging Places of Worship Commercial Government, Institutional, Hospitals, Education Industrial Parks, Conservation Areas, Golf Courses Residential Group Quarters, Nursing Homes Residential Multi-Family Residential Mobile Home, or Commercial Parking Lot Residential Single-Family Submerged Land (Water Bodies) Transportation, Communication, Rights-Of- Way Utility Plants and Lines, Solid Waste Disposal Vacant Total Acres Coastal Hazard Zone Hurricane Vulnerability Flood Zones Zone Wildfire Susceptible Areas Potential Sinkhole Areas Acres 93,844.6 190,400.3 409,143.2 41,160.5 13,111.2 % 44.3 55.7 59.1 42.3 71.0 Acres 0.5 118.4 223.2 59.5 103.4 % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.6 Acres 7.1 61.1 228.5 128.0 16.1 % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 Acres 20.1 125.3 313.4 158.7 112.6 % 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 Acres 2,896.5 3,234.7 7,891.5 670.6 116.6 % 1.4 1.0 1.1 0.7 0.6 Acres 173.4 235.2 412.0 108.8 68.0 % 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.4 Acres 93,864.7 104,451.6 161,260.7 8,562.3 934.3 % 44.3 30.6 23.3 8.8 5.1 Acres 1.3 249.7 254.6 10.3 0.0 % 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Acres 0.0 0.0 10.0 9.4 0.0 % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Acres 1,737.5 5,172.0 18,401.1 10,449.8 754.2 % 0.8 1.5 2.7 10.7 4.1 Acres 1,195.4 3,874.8 11,275.4 5,093.1 987.4 % 0.6 1.1 1.6 5.2 5.3 Acres 1,442.8 1,442.8 1,800.8 20.5 0.0 % 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 Acres 14.5 14.5 16.5 5.4 0.0 % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Acres 154.5 190.6 379.2 132.6 44.6 % 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 Acres 16,435.7 32,246.4 80,738.3 30,712.6 2,209.0 % 7.8 9.4 11.7 31.6 12.0 Acres 211,788.6 341,817.2 692,348.4 97,282.0 18,457.4 % 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 7

Table 2.5 Total and Undeveloped Acres in Hazard Areas by Future Land Use Category for the Unincorporated County Future Land Use Category Agriculture Commercial Estate Industrial Preserve Public Single Family Total Acres Coastal Hazard Zone Hurricane Vulnerability Zone Flood Zones Wildfire Potential Sinkhole Susceptible Areas Areas Total Undev. Total Undev. Total Undev. Total Undev. Total Undev. Acres 142,418.2 14,660.1 258,615.3 27,928.0 522,554.8 61,648.2 69,348.2 20,348.2 14,853.4 1,272.9 % 67.3 89.2 75.7 86.6 75.5 76.4 71.3 66.3 80.5 57.6 Acres 933.4 198.4 2,569.3 610.4 5,048.0 1,301.0 1,725.0 524.8 1,481.4 517.6 % 0.4 1.2 0.8 1.9 0.7 1.6 1.8 1.7 8.0 23.4 Acres 31.9 0.0 4,885.3 1,317.5 28,045.7 11,659.9 16,098.4 8,400.0 311.4 154.0 % 0.0 0.0 1.4 4.1 4.1 14.4 16.6 27.4 1.7 7.0 Acres 0.0 0.0 451.4 8.3 803.4 69.3 273.1 26.8 288.2 4.7 % 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.1 1.6 0.2 Acres 67,663.3 1,443.9 70,606.6 1,583.3 122,710.5 3,086.0 6,216.9 104.3 412.2 4.9 % 32.0 8.8 20.7 4.9 17.7 3.8 6.4 0.3 2.2 0.2 Acres 491.8 0.0 491.8 0.0 757.5 8.7 152.0 9.4 0.0 0.0 % 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 Acres 250.1 133.3 4,197.6 799.0 12,428.4 2,965.2 3,468.3 1,299.2 1,110.6 254.8 % 0.1 0.8 1.2 2.5 1.8 3.7 3.6 4.2 6.0 11.5 Acres 211,788.6 16,435.7 341,817.2 32,246.4 692,348.4 80,738.3 97,282.0 30,712.6 18,457.3 2,209.0 % 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Table 2.6 presents the total numbers of acres in a hazard zone in Levy County s incorporated areas and how many of those acres are currently undeveloped. All of the municipalities in the County are at risk from flooding and wildfire. Fanning Springs and Inglis are the only municipalities that are affected by all four hazards. Yankeetown has the most acres in the coastal hazard zone, hurricane vulnerability zone, and in the 100-year floodplain, making it the most at risk out of all of the incorporated areas in the County. Williston has the most acres in wildfire susceptible areas, 1,491 acres, and Chiefland has the most acres in potential sinkhole areas, 1,608 acres. Bronson has the least amount of acres in hazards zones of all the incorporated areas. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 8

Table 2.6 Total and Vacant Incorporated Acres in Hazard Areas Jurisdiction Coastal Hazard Zone Hurricane Vulnerability Zone Flood Zones Wildfire Susceptible Areas Potential Sinkhole Areas Total Vacant Total Vacant Total Vacant Total Vacant Total Vacant Bronson Acres 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 422.0 107.5 982.0 287.6 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.1 25.5 22.3 29.3 0.0 0.0 Cedar Key Acres 161.0 55.1 496.7 175.5 1,066.5 512.5 1.3 0.7 0.0 0.0 % 3.1 34.2 6.7 35.3 10.3 48.1 0.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 Chiefland Acres 0.0 0.0 687.7 155.6 1,936.8 317.5 743.7 124.4 1,607.5 233.6 % 0.0 0.0 9.2 22.6 18.8 16.4 16.9 16.7 56.3 29.4 Fanning Acres 222.5 74.5 517.9 143.6 136.7 69.3 167.4 48.8 539.7 227.6 Springs % 4.3 33.5 6.9 27.7 1.3 50.7 3.8 29.2 18.9 28.6 Inglis Otter Creek Williston Yankeetown Total Acres Acres 526.3 208.0 541.1 212.2 955.0 309.4 768.7 270.9 708.5 334.2 % 10.1 39.5 7.3 39.2 9.2 32.4 17.5 35.2 24.8 42.0 Acres 0.0 0.0 869.4 234.5 403.3 156.3 144.5 71.3 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 0.0 11.7 27.0 3.9 38.8 3.3 49.4 0.0 0.0 Acres 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,320.4 399.5 1,490.7 169.9 0.0 0.0 % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.8 30.3 33.9 11.4 0.0 0.0 Acres 4,328.0 1,394.4 4,348.7 1,409.8 4,091.2 1,186.4 104.3 25.0 0.0 0.0 % 82.6 32.2 58.3 32.4 39.6 29.0 2.4 23.9 0.0 0.0 Acres 5,237.7 1,731.9 7,461.5 2,331.2 10,331.9 3,058.4 4,402.7 998.5 2,855.7 795.4 % 100.0 33.1 100.0 31.2 100.0 29.6 100.0 22.7 100.0 100.0 3. Existing Mitigation Measures Local Mitigation Strategy The is an ideal repository for all hazard mitigation analyses, policies, programs, and projects for the County and its municipalities due to its multi-jurisdictional and intergovernmental nature. The identifies hazard mitigation needs in a community and structural or non-structural initiatives that can be employed to reduce community vulnerability. Communities can further reduce their vulnerability to natural hazards by integrating the analyses and mitigation objectives into their Comprehensive Plans. An prepared pursuant to the State s 1998 guidelines has three substantive components (FDCA, 2005b): Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment (HIVA). This section identifies a community s vulnerability to natural hazards. Under Florida rules, the HIVA is required to include, at a minimum, an evaluation of the vulnerability of structures, infrastructure, special risk populations, environmental resources, and the economy to any hazard the community is susceptible to. According to FEMA, s revised pursuant to the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 (DMA 2000) criteria must include maps and descriptions of the areas that would be affected by each hazard, information on previous events, and estimates of future probabilities. Vulnerability should be assessed for the types and numbers of exposed buildings, infrastructure, and critical facilities with estimates of potential monetary Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 9

losses. Plan updates will be required to assess the vulnerability of future growth and development. Guiding Principles. This section lists and assesses the community s existing hazard mitigation policies and programs and their impacts on community vulnerability. The Guiding Principles typically contain a list of existing policies from the community s Comprehensive Plan and local ordinances that govern or are related to hazard mitigation. Coastal counties frequently include policies from their Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plans (PDRPs). Mitigation Initiatives. This component identifies and prioritizes structural and non-structural initiatives that can reduce hazards vulnerability. Proposals for amendments to Comprehensive Plans, land development regulations, and building codes are often included. Structural projects typically address public facilities and infrastructure, and buyouts of private structures that are repetitively damaged by flood. Many of these qualify as capital improvement projects based on the magnitude of their costs and may also be included in the capital improvements elements of the Counties and Cities Comprehensive Plans. The Goals and Objectives will guide the priority of the mitigation initiatives. The Levy County (adopted in 2005) was used as a source of information in developing this profile and was also reviewed for any enhancements that could be made to allow better integration with other plans, particularly the local Comprehensive Plans. Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment This section of the was reviewed for its ability to provide hazard data that can support comprehensive planning. The Levy County is a strong hazard mitigation resource. General information in this section of the gives a broad overview of potential hazards that face the County as well as the hazard mitigation process. The includes an analysis of potential damages to structures, critical facilities, populations at risk for each type of natural disaster, infrastructure at risk, and mitigation initiatives. It does discuss future land uses in relation to population centers. The maps in the show the hazard areas and correlate this with population centers. Land uses are not shown on the maps. There are maps and tables that showed the location of public facilities, critical facilities, and mobile home parks. Incorporating land use and population data into the risk assessment of the provides a better source of data for planners to use in policy making and policy evaluation of the local Comprehensive Plan. There is also a large section that lists potential funding sources and resources for hazard mitigation projects. Guiding Principles The states that this section of the document can be used as a road map to assist Levy County and its municipalities in promoting hazard mitigation before and after a disaster. It refers to a 200 page index of goals and policies from existing studies and plans that relate to hazard mitigation including the Withlacoochee Regional Hurricane Evacuation Study, County Emergency Management Plan, and County and municipality comprehensive plans. The vision of for the County that is articulated in these documents serves as the basis for the formation of the guiding principles in the. Goals and Objectives The Goals and Objectives can be found in Attachment E. The goals and objectives are also summarized in Section 5 as part of the recommendations analysis. The following is a summary of how well the has addressed mitigation issues that coincide with planning concerns. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 10

The includes 12 goals and 66 objectives that were drafted after the study of numerous existing documents including the Withlacoochee Region Hurricane Evacuation Study, Bureau of Business and Economic Research (BEBR) Economic Outlook, Levy County CEMP, Hazardous Materials Emergency Plan for the Withlacoochee Region, and County and municipality comprehensive plans. Most of these goals and objectives are reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. There are objectives that promote public education about potential hazards including flood prone areas, disaster preparedness, evacuation procedures and shelter availability. These objectives are general in nature but can be strengthened by creating policies in the Comprehensive Plan that address specific mitigation initiatives and hazard programs. Objectives also reference other hazard mitigation resources such as the Floodplains Management Plan, CEMP, and local ordinances. Objectives address evacuation routes and shelters. The also has many strong policies that aim to protect natural resources such as wetlands, coastal lands, open space, native vegetation, drainage features, and environmentally sensitive areas. Other objectives call for regulation of public and private structures in hazardous areas by limiting public expenditures, increasing building code requirements, and promoting involvement in the NFIP and CRS. Objectives in the involving cultural and historic resources are mirrored in the Comprehensive Plan. Overall, the goals and objectives in the are thorough; however there is some disconnection between the and the Comprehensive Plan. The does not refer to the Comprehensive Plan as a mechanism to reach the listed goals and objectives. Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan The CEMP Annex II outlines the pre and post-disaster roles and responsibilities for the Mitigation Task Force. This task force assists in pre-disaster mitigation efforts such as improving the Local Mitigation Strategy by providing all the information used for updating the Hazard Identification and Vulnerability Assessment and sharing information to all applicable agencies. Members assist the Local Mitigation Strategy Task Force in developing appropriate initiatives. The task force is also responsible for the education of the public and government about the value of mitigation. Members participate in the Recovery Task Force and help with recovery activities while assessing future mitigation initiatives. Opportunity to evaluate the existing mitigation policies and initiatives first hand is a strong approach to hazard mitigation. Such an advantage may help strengthen hazard mitigations policies and initiatives by better identifying the County s needs in a time of crisis and responding to those needs in future mitigation efforts. Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan A Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan (PDRP) for Levy County was not available for review at the time this profile was drafted. If Levy County has a current PDRP, this will be obtained and reviewed for the final version of this document. National Flood Insurance Program/Community Rating System Levy County and all of its jurisdictions, except Chiefland, are participating communities in the National Flood Insurance Program. In addition, Levy County, Fanning Springs, and Yankeetown participate in the Community Rating System and have current classes of 8, 9, and 7 respectively. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 11

4. Comprehensive Plan Review Levy County s Comprehensive Plan (adopted in?) was reviewed in order to see what the County has already done to integrate their policies, and hazard mitigation in general, into their planning process. A list of the goals, objectives, and policies currently in the plan that contribute to hazard mitigation is found in Attachment F. The following is a summary of how well the plan addressed the four hazards of this analysis. The Levy County Comprehensive Plan has many policies that relate to hazard mitigation. There are polices that support the protection of natural resources including coastal resources, water bodies, wetlands, forested areas, soils, barrier and offshore islands, vegetation, open space, steep slopes, beaches and dunes, and environmentally sensitive areas. Cultural and historic resources are adequately addressed in several policies. Policies also address evacuation clearance times and show the County s commitment to providing a safe and timely evacuation. Evacuation shelters were not addressed in the Comprehensive Plan. Policies encourage development outside the CHHA and limit public expenditure in hazard areas. Flood and Coastal Hazards There are also policies that limit or regulate development near natural resources, which can protect the environment as well as reduce potential property losses due to flooding and other natural disasters. The protection of public and private property is addressed in many policies by enforcing numerous building codes, limiting public subsidy in hazard areas, promoting the clustering of development, and regulating development in hazardous areas. Wildfire Hazards Polices that addressed wildfires are present in the Comprehensive Plan and do foster the ongoing relationship with the Department of Forestry. The conservation of potable water to reduce hazards associated with drought is also mentioned. Sinkhole Hazards Sinkholes were not directly addressed in the plan, although soil conditions and steep slopes are considered during the development review process. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 12

5. Recommendations For the to be effective in the decision-making process of growth management, its objectives and policies must be integrated into the Comprehensive Plan. The Plan is the legal basis for all local land use decisions made. If hazard mitigation is to be accomplished beyond the occasional drainage project, these hazards must be addressed in comprehensive planning, where development can be limited or regulated in high-risk hazard areas just as sensitive environments are routinely protected through growth management policies. Mitigation of hazards is considerably easier and less expensive if done when raw land is being converted into development. Retrofitting structure and public facilities after they have been built is significantly more expensive. However, if older neighborhoods or communities are scheduled to be revitalized or redeveloped, hazard mitigation needs to be an aspect considered and integrated into the project prior to the time of development approval. Levy County has begun this process of integrating hazard mitigation throughout its Plan s elements. The prior section summarized how the major hazards for the County have been for the most part well addressed. There is, however, still some disconnection between the objectives and initiatives and the policies in the Comprehensive Plan. By tightening the connection between these documents, the County will find it easier to implement hazard mitigation, and there will be higher awareness of these issues within more departments of the County government. Table 5.1 presents options for further integration as well as the basis for these recommendations. NOTE: The recommendations set out in this section are only suggestions. Through the workshop process and contact with the local governments, the goal of this project is to end up with specific recommendations tailored and acceptable to each county. While the Profile addresses hurricanes, flooding, wildfire and sinkholes, during the update of the local comprehensive plan, the county should consider other hazards if appropriate, such as tornadoes and soil subsidence. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 13

Table 5.1 Options for Integrating Hazard Mitigation Principles into Levy County's Comprehensive Plan Strategies & Integration Topics Comp Plan Current Information, Goals & Objectives Current Comprehensive Plan Policies Options for Further Integration into the Comprehensive Plan Options for Enhancement of the Basis For Suggested Options Strategy 1 - Collaboration, coordination, and education a) Is there information sharing and/or involvement in plan development between planners and emergency managers? Yes Yes G 4. Ensure intergovernmental coordination in disaster preparedness, response, recovery and mitigation between all applicable local governments. FLUE P. 4.1 and evacuation plans shall be updated by EM Director ICE P. 1.1 Intergovernmental issues and procedures addressed by CTAC, including land use plans, emergency planning, natural resource protection. b) Do the Comp Plan,, CEMP, and other local and regional plans cross-reference each other and include consistent data on hazardous locations? Yes Yes O4.1 Maintain and update (as necessary) the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. O4.3 Coordinate interjurisdictional resources during recovery efforts. O4.4 Conduct annual updates and revisions (as necessary) to the Local Mitigation Strategy. O4.5 Coordinate and prioritize applications for hazard mitigation grants. O5.1 Expedite post-disaster recovery through the development of a Post-disaster Recovery Ordinance. O8.1 Develop or maintain a Stormwater Management Plan that identifies and recommends solutions to stormwater problems. O9.8 Continue compliance with Floodplain Management Plans. CME P. 7.3 The County shall consult federal and state agencies in developing and implementing Comp Plans. CME P 12.1 The County adopts the (CEMP) and shall prepare LDRs to implement Coastal Hazard Mit. Plans. CME P. 14.4 Any inter-agency or (CEMP) report shall be incorporated in CME. FLUE P. 4.1 and evacuation plans shall be updated by EM Director. FLUE P. 8.1 The County will prepare int. gov. agreements to coordinate plans and protect resources with SRWMD and SWWMD. ICE P. 2.5 Proposed dev. Within the CHHA will be coordinated with Cedar Key, Inglis, Yankeetown, Citrus County and Dixie County. Support the and use it as mitigation tool to identify hazard areas and to identify potential hazard mitigation projects. can reference Comprehensive Plan as a mechanism to reach mitigation goals. The Comprehensive Plan does reference the CEMP and the but does not refer to their use in Comprehensive Planning. Analysis of hazards and the County's vulnerability found in the can be used by planners to make Comprehensive Plan amendments and future land use decisions. Better integration of and Comp Plan policies can improve the County's overall hazard mitigation strategy. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 14

Table 5.1 Options for Integrating Hazard Mitigation Principles into Levy County's Comprehensive Plan Strategies & Integration Topics Comp Plan Current Information, Goals & Objectives Current Comprehensive Plan Policies Options for Further Integration into the Comprehensive Plan Options for Enhancement of the Basis For Suggested Options d) Are there measures to educate residents, homeowner/property associations, and the business community of ways they can mitigate against hazards? Yes Yes O1.1 Inform and educate the public about potential hazards. O1.2 Encourage home buyers to research and determine if a property is within a flood prone area. G 2. Promote hazard awareness and education. O2.1 Notify homeowners of property located within a floodprone area. O2.2 Inform and educate the public about potential hazards. O2.3 Prioritize and develop a hazard information program. O2.4 Educate the public about disaster preparedness, evacuation procedures and shelter availability. O2.5 Coordinate to provide public information regarding commercial hazardous materials and educate the public to safely store and dispose of household hazardous materials. O3.1 Minimize business interruptions through disaster preparedness and education. O3.2 Assist business and industry in the preparation of emergency operations plans. CME P. 12.2 County will provide existing developments along the coast a disaster preparedness plan. Promote educational programs to the public, local businesses, and County personnel about flood prone areas, hurricane preparedness, wildfire hazards, hazardous materials, evacuation routes and shelters, and business emergency plans. Promote existing and future neighborhoods to become Firewise USA Communities. Include objective that addresses wildfire hazards. Educational programs may help create an informed public and decrease loss of property and life in the event of a natural disaster. Further education of county officials and employees may promote hazard mitigation initiatives before development occurs. The County can educate local site plan reviewers on the importance of flood, wildfire, and sinkhole mitigation as well as the strategies used to reduce the vulnerability. Plan reviewers could then promote these ideas to local developers and explain their importance during the site plan review process. Draft 12/6/2005 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS 16