Ballard-Interbay MIC Summary Statistics

Similar documents
2040 LAND USE WORKBOOK February 2017

CONTAINER PORT GOALS 10-2

LAND USE POLICIES BY COMMUNITY DESIGNATION

EXAMPLES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICIES HOW TO ESTIMATE THE BENEFITS OF THE CTR PROGRAM

Update on ST3 West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions

RURAL RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ALL COMMUNITIES

Clackamas County Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 8: ECONOMICS

MEMORANDUM #4. DATE: November 4, Warrenton TSP Project Management Team. Ray Delahanty, AICP, DKS Associates Kate Petak, EIT, DKS Associates

SUBURBAN EDGE COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES SUBURBAN EDGE

RURAL CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE RURAL CENTER ALL COMMUNITIES

DIVERSIFIED RURAL COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE DIVERSIFIED RURAL ALL COMMUNITIES

The Role of Urban Goods in Sustainable Transportation Systems

C-01c: Downtown Seattle to Ballard (Market Street vicinity) LRT, primarily elevated/tunnel options

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Stakeholder Advisory Group March 14, 2018

Appendix D Policy Analysis and Evaluation Criteria Report

GMA Periodic Update Policy/Text Requirements

Sustainable Newark. Planning for Growth, Choice & Economic Sustainability

Summary of transportation-related goals and objectives from existing regional plans

Land Use INTRODUCTION

Click to edit Master title style. Port of Everett Data Overview

Based on the review of the City of Sultan s comprehensive plan, the following recommendation is proposed for action.

Funding Application. Project Information. Contact Information. Project Description. 1 of 15. April 20th, :01 AM

TRANSPORTATION AND LAND USE

Once known as warehousing and distribution, the process

Funding Application. Project Information. Contact Information. Project Description. 1 of 23. April 19th, :30 PM

12 Evaluation of Alternatives

Waterfront Transit Service

APPENDIX N East King County Subarea High Capacity Transit (HCT) Analysis: Approach to Assessing System-Level Alternatives

West Seattle and Ballard Link Extensions. Level 2 Evaluation Results September 2018

Growth in the Fresno Metro Area

City of Granite Falls 2017 Comprehensive Plan Update

Consequences of Sprawl

Chapter Six Future Transportation and Land Use

CONTAINER PORT ELEMENT

URBAN CENTER COMMUNITY ROLE COUNCIL ROLE ALL COMMUNITIES URBAN CENTER

Exercise 1: Policies and Action Steps

Dear Board of County Commissioners, Mayor Flitner, and Town Councilors,

Chapter 5 Transportation Draft

Currituck County Moyock Mega-Site Market Feasibility Study March 28, 2016

PSRC s 2018 Regional FTA Competition Project Evaluation Criteria

PROPERTY OVERVIEW HEAVY INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION AMENITIES LOCATION WHERE BUSINESS HAPPENS

4: Transportation and Land Use

Infrastructure and Growth Leadership Advisory Group Ideas and Approaches Survey

Item No.: 5A Attachment Date of Meeting: April 3, March 5, 2018

CONTAINER PORT ELEMENT

PROPERTY OVERVIEW HEAVY INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TRANSPORTATION AMENITIES LOCATION WHERE BUSINESS HAPPENS

Transportation, Mobility and Access

2. Goals and Objectives

South Sounder Capital Improvements Program

1.1.1.b. Agencies share best practices as they integrate COMPASS facilitates

CHAPTER 8: INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION

Executive Summary. Figure ES-1. Historical and Forecasted Regional Population and Employment

Container Port Element in Washington s Growth Management Act. Traci Goodwin Senior Port Counsel Port of Seattle July 12, 2011

Transit Oriented Development Study

North Woodbridge Urban Mixed Use Master Zoning Plan

Chapter 2 - Economic Development

Chapter 3 - Goals, Objectives, & Strategies

Performance Measures Workshop, May 18, 2017

GUIDING PRINCIPLES MEMORANDUM

part 3: reporting tools

2040 Transportation Policy Plan Conversion to Performance Based Planning Basis. 25 th Annual CTS Transportation Research Conference May 21, 2014

Riverview Corridor Pre-Project Development Study

Appendix C: Scenarios and Future Drivers Impacting Transportation

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District

Chapter 4: Transportation and Land Use

Joint Study Session #12 August 23,

APPENDIX A: Transportation Planning Rule

Guidance for Responding to the Transportation 2040 Prioritization Measures

MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

Los Angeles County Sustainability Summit Your Community: Smart Growth and Community Development

Transportation Concurrency

Transportation Concurrency

New Climate for Transportation. How the City of San Diego and SANDAG must improve transportation to meet climate goals.

Industrial Market Analysis and Land Use Strategy

TRANSPORTATION 101 Today and Tomorrow. Moving People and Goods

3.12 LAND USE AND PLANNING

Mobility and System Reliability Goal

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission 2045 Regional Metropolitan Transportation Plan Goals and Objectives Adopted March 22, 2017

REGIONAL PLANNING AND POLICY FRAMEWORK A Preferred Approach for our Regional Growth

Appendix F: Scenario Planning

FERRY COUNTY COUNTY-WIDE PLANNING POLICIES

FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT

City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services

Appendix I-D: Evaluation Criteria for Selecting a Preferred Growth Alternative

Weatherford General Plan Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS

2016 MAJOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT

Contents i Contents Page 1 A New Transportation Plan Community Involvement Goals and Objectives... 11

Chapter 1 Introduction

Chapter 5 - Transportation

Fox Integration Puget Sound Regional Integrator

Issue Paper on Regional Land Use and Transit Planning (Draft)

The Victorian Transport Plan (Department of Transport, 2008).

Safety and Security for Residents, Visitors, and Businesses

TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL M E M O R A N D U M

Policy Research CENTER

The Level of Service Metric and. Alternatives for Multi-Modal Transportation. in Oakland

Asmoothly functioning freight transportation

Airports in the Region Case Study

3. STATION SPACING AND SITING GUIDELINES

White Paper: Implementing the Climate Action Plan in the Zoning Regulations

Transcription:

BallardInterbay MIC Founded in 1869, the City of Seattle is the leading commercial, cultural and advanced technology center of the U.S. Pacific Northwest, and a major port city for transpacific and European trade. With a 2010 population of more than 608,000, the city is the region s largest and most diverse in terms of population, economic activity, and transportation options. In addition to six designated regional growth centers, the city has two manufacturing/industrial centers: Ballard Interbay and Duwamish. The MICs were established to ensure that adequate accessible industrial land is available to promote a diversified employment base and sustain Seattle s contribution to regional highwage job growth. The BallardInterbay manufacturing/industrial center (BINMIC) is located in the northwest part of the City of Seattle, and extends some 3 miles from the northwest corner of downtown Seattle to Ballard. The industrially zoned BINMIC is a thriving urban industrial center with a diverse mix of businesses. The center spans from Elliott Bay to Salmon Bay, and includes some of the city s most productive working waterfront, wharfs, shipyards, and rail yards. Salmon Bay is home to Fisherman s Terminal, one of the largest commercial fishing terminals in the northwest. The Salmon Bay area, stretching from the Ballard Locks to Fremont, also supports intense marinerelated industrial and manufacturing uses. The Interbay part of the center, located between Salmon Bay and Elliott Bay, contains one of Seattle s major railroad yards. At the south end of the center, Smith Cove on Elliott Bay is home to Terminal 91 (a large general cargo terminal complex) and Pier 86 (a Port of Seattle export grain terminal). The BINMIC is also the home port of the North Pacific Fishing Fleet. While maritime uses are important industry, economic activity in the center includes a diverse mix of businesses. 82% of the businesses in BINMIC have 25 or fewer employees. GM Nameplate is the largest manufacturing employer in the center, and some of the largest employers in Interbay are grocery and retailers. 2010 Summary Statistics Land use Gross acreage 971 Average block size (acres) 5.8 Average parcel size (acres) 1.2 Mix of uses Population/Employee ratio 1.3 : 10 Population Total population 1,846 Change (2000 2010) 467 Housing Total housing units 780 Change (2000 2010) 199 Employment Total employment 14,237 Change (2000 2010) 398 Transportation Employee access to transit 68% Workbased mode share SOV / HOV 68% 9% Walk & Bike / Transit 7% 16% Acreage, Density & Mix of Activity BallardInterbay is among the smallest regional manufacturing/industrial centers in terms of total gross acreage (971 acres) with a net developable acreage of 749 acres (77% of gross acres). In terms of its role in the city, the BallardInterbay regional center contains 2 percent of the city's overall land area, 0.3 percent of the population, 0.3 percent of the housing, and 3.1 percent of the city's employment. Compared to centers as a whole, BallardInterbay has medium number of total activity units (16,083), with a larger number of jobs (14,237 total jobs), and is heavily employment oriented (89% jobs/11% residents). At 16.6 activity units per acre, Ballard Interbay is significantly more dense than the 8.1 average for manufacturing/industrial centers. 2013 Regional Centers Monitoring Report Center Profiles Page 114

MultiFamily Residential SingleFamily Residential Mixed Use Commercial Industrial Institutional Parks and Open Space Parking Vacant Developable Other Land Use & Urban Form The major land uses in BallardInterbay are industrial (62%), commercial (20%), and vacant developable (10%). About 86 percent of the center s 749 net acres are in employmentrelated use. Ballard Interbay's average parcel size is 1.2 acres, which is significantly smaller than the average 7.0acre size for MI centers. The center s average block size is 5.8 acres, compared to an average 55.4acre size among manufacturing/industrial centers. BallardInterbay has a nearly complete network of sidewalks (96% coverage). Current Land Use (749 net acres) 1% 20% 62% 4% 2% 1% 10% 1% 2013 Regional Centers Monitoring Report Center Profiles Page 115

Construction/Resource Finance/Insur./Real Estate* Manufacturing Retail Services Wholesale/Transp./Utilities Government Education Suppressed/Other Population The total population in BallardInterbay is 1,846, and it has grown by 467 residents over the past 10 years. Employment The total employment in BallardInterbay is 14,237, and has decreased by 398 jobs over the past 10 years. The major industry sectors are Services (43%), Manufacturing (22%), and Wholesale, Transportation & Utilities (14%). Of the total number of jobs, about half (45%) are in 'goods dependent' industries that are typically appropriate for regional manufacturing/industrial centers. BINMIC includes 6,170 jobs in industry clusters, with 2,609 jobs in the Maritime cluster alone. Housing BallardInterbay has 780 total housing units, with a density of 0.8 housing units per gross acre. Over the past 10 years, housing has increased by 199 units, a 34% increase in residential population. Many of the residential units are unusual for an industrial district, including houseboats and liveaboards. Size of Businesses (674 workplaces) 1,177 10% 41% Jobs by Sector (14,237 jobs) 3,154 41% 6,096 2,043 14 Employees 524 2550 50100 100+ 337 1,430 Transportation For workbased trips, BallardInterbay's travel characteristics are different from the region as a whole, with fewer singleoccupant vehicle (SOV) and more transit trips. The region s SOV share is 76 percent, while the center's share is 68 percent. The region's nonsov mode share is 24 percent, with 10 percent in transit and 5 percent in walk/bike. The center s nonsov share is 32 percent, with 16 percent in transit and 7 percent in walk/bike. Among the MICs, Ballard Interbay has the lowest SOV share and the highest transit share. The total daily trips from BallardInterbay are highly focused on destinations in regional centers (26% of all trips); this includes trips that stay within the center (7%) and trips that go to other centers (20%). In terms of employee access to transit, BallardInterbay has moderate access, with 68 percent of employees within a 1/4 mile walk to a transit stop. For the 1/2 mile walkshed, the center has nearly complete levels of employee access to transit (95%). Plan Overview Seattle includes a section in the Neighborhood element of its comprehensive plan dedicated to BINMIC. Through its neighborhood planning process, Seattle has developed neighborhood plans for both of its manufacturing/industrial centers. Though the plans were recognized as the vision and goals of neighborhoods, only the subset of policies adopted in the Neighborhood element of its comprehensive Mode Shares 16% 7% 9% 68% Trip Destinations 12% 6% 8% 20% 54% SOV HOV Walk &Bike Transit Within Center Within City Other Center Other Ctr City Rest of Region 2013 Regional Centers Monitoring Report Center Profiles Page 116

plan are considered adopted city policy. Policies included in the element are based on the BINMIC Neighborhood Plan completed in 1999. The BINMIC subsection of the Neighborhood element emphasizes supporting waterfront industries and longterm preservation of industrial land uses for marine/fishing, high tech, and small manufacturing/industrial activities. The Neighborhood element includes policies addressing economic development, freight mobility and transportation, maritime industry and fishing industry, and public services, utilities, and infrastructure. Comparison to Center Plan Checklist The city s primary center planning document was reviewed to evaluate the extent to which the plan addresses topics in the PSRC Regional Center Plan Checklist. Both the Urban Village element and the relevant section of the Neighborhood element were reviewed for this analysis. This policylevel review of the current plan is intended both to provide preliminary assessment of consistency of the plan with center guidelines and to evaluate the Regional Centers Checklist for any potential improvements. Goals established through the Urban Village element in Seattle s comprehensive plan are applicable to both the Ballard Interbay and Duwamish manufacturing industrial centers. Urban village policies address a number of aspects of the center plans checklist. These include promoting industrial land for industrial purposes, ensuring availability of land to sustain a diverse employment base and supporting retention and expansion of existing industrial businesses and opportunities for new compatible businesses. The city seeks to designate centers consistent with the countywide planning policies by establishing zoning that promotes industrial uses and discourages incompatible uses, maintaining buffers to minimize impact of industrial activities, encouraging assembly of large parcels suitable for industrial activity, providing zoning capacity to accommodate at least 10,000 jobs, and maintaining reasonable transportation access. Most of the Regional Manufacturing/Industrial Center Plan Checklist topics are addressed in the Neighborhood element. The BINMIC section includes boundaries for the center, as well as growth targets, although the employment target identified in the Neighborhood element is higher than the target established in the Urban Village Appendix. The plan includes policies to preserve land for industrial activities and enforce regulations to retain waterdependent uses. Strategies are included to support manufacturing and industry. These include emphasis on land assembly on the waterfront to accommodate heavier maritime uses and opportunities for industrial reuse of vacant governmentally owned property within the BINMIC. The plan identifies key sectors and industry clusters in the center and strategies that address freight movement. These strategies include improving turning radii, sight lines, clearance and lane configuration of streets within the BINMIC and providing adequate rightofway for truck loading and grade separation between streets and rail lines. The plan includes policy to work with King County Metro to improve transit access to and within BINMIC, along with strategies that address freight movement and employee commuting. The BINMIC Neighborhood element addresses many of the existing expectations of the Regional Manufacturing/Industrial Center Plan Checklist, though there are aspects that the plan does not address or that could be strengthened in future updates. The plan doesn t yet speak to design standards in the center to mitigate industrial impacts. A stronger emphasis on the environment could be incorporated in the plan, including policies addressing stormwater, air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions. A market analysis of the center s development potential has not been included. Given the element s policy focus, it provides a limited amount of information on existing conditions, including the percentage of planned land use and zoning for industrial uses and transportation networks within the center. Finally, the plan does not yet include mode split goals. 2013 Regional Centers Monitoring Report Center Profiles Page 117

Planning Challenges & Implementation Strategies As noted by the city in its July 2012 presentation to the Growth Management Policy Board, Ballard Interbay s challenges include real estate speculation, a declining work force, and barriers to accessing the regional highway system. In the center, much of the industrialzoned property is assessed for higher value nonindustrial uses, and increasing population is driving new development and higher rents. BINMIC is under greater pressure to convert to other uses than other MICs because of its prime location, with proximity to the waterfront, transit, desirable residential areas and downtown Seattle. The center also confronts planning challenges from Shoreline Master Program and balancing the demand for waterfront land. Seattle recognizes significant assets in the center, including existing concentration of the Pacific fishing fleet and other maritime uses. The city has employed strategies to address challenges and plan for the success of its manufacturing/industrial center, including a programmatic Environmental Impact Statement to streamline environmental review and lowered size limits for office and retail. 2013 Regional Centers Monitoring Report Center Profiles Page 118