SState of Ontario's Forests - Indicator Report

Similar documents
State of resources reporting

Earth Observation for Sustainable Development of Forests (EOSD) - A National Project

Zero Net Deforestation

Development of a National Forest Resources Database under the Kyoto Protocol

COSTS OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION OFFSETS FROM SUBSTITUTING FOSSIL FUELS WITH FOREST RESIDUE BIOMASS IN CANADA

ELEMENT 4.5 CONTRIBUTIONS TO HYDROLOGICAL CYCLES

Understanding Your Environment: Forests, Trees and Responsible Wood Products

2. Inventory estimates for the Kyoto Protocol (WP 1.2)

The Art of Timber Cruising Part II Fixed-Area Plots

B.C./CANADA STATISTICS

Understanding Your Environment: Forests, Trees and Responsible Wood Products

REGENERATION AND SAPLING SURVEY

Carbon at risk. B.C. s Unprotected Old-Growth Rainforest. Logging on Vancouver Island Photo: TJ Watt

REVIEW OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMITMENTS AND OF OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE CONVENTION

Forest and plantation challenges and opportunities for emission trading

Developing a Voluntary Carbon Offsets Program for Ontario

Appendix II. Growth & Yield Monitoring Plan

Decision 16/CMP.1 Land use, land-use change and forestry

Forest Resource Assessment Policy

Forest Resource Assessment Policy

Forest Management Program

Scope and methodology for measuring the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and Carbon Profile of the Canadian Forestry Industry

Vulnerability of Northern Forests and Forestry:

Forest monitoring information needs in Canada

Noble Forest Carbon Project

Narration: In this presentation you will learn about the basic concepts of carbon accounting and the

Forest Cover and Trends Analysis

Managed Forest Tax Incentive Program Encouraging Responsible Forest Stewardship Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry

Forest Co-op. op Growth & Yield Science Unit Permanent Growth Plot Program. Ken Lennon September 23, 2009

Information on LULUCF actions by Sweden. First progress report

Australian carbon policy: Implications for farm businesses

Ontario Forest Resource Inventory. Ontario Ecological Land Classification.

4.2.5 Afforestation and Reforestation

The Social and Economic Importance of Canada s Privately Owned Forest Lands

Southwestern Landfill Environmental Assessment

2013 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol G.1

Brief Overview of Forestry and Information Issues in Canada. Valerie LeMay,, PhD, RPF Faculty of Forestry, University of British Columbia, Canada

UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES LAND-USE, LAND-USE CHANGE AND FORESTRY. Submissions from Parties

Q&A: Omineca spruce beetle outbreak May 4, 2018

Tree and Forest Measurement

CANADA INFORMAL SUBMISSION TO THE AWG-KP: DATA ON FOREST MANAGEMENT November 30, 2009

Appendix 1: Forest Carbon Emission Offset Project Development Guidance

forestry -practices, and carbon dioxid ribs o u m ia : oress, MINI~TRy LIBRARY 1450 QOVERNIt I ST RESEARCH Introduction Forests and th e carbon cycle

Afforestation and Reforestation under the UNFCCC

GHG ACCOUNTING FRAMEWORKS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THE CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION POTENTIAL FROM WOOD BIOMASS IN CANADA

New Zealand. A Submission to the Ad-Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I Parties under the Kyoto Protocol (AWG-KP)

Numerous documents related to the Carbon Neutral Initiative and with specific reference to forest carbon, have been developed by or for FPAC.

Appendix II. Growth & Yield Monitoring Plan

Important Copyright Information

Kyoto Protocol Information Requirement

AUSTRALIA. Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry (LULUCF) Informal Data Submission September 2009

Decision 11/CP.7. Land use, land-use change and forestry. Recalling its decisions 1/CP.4, 8/CP.4, 9/CP.4 and 16/CP.5,

2006, Queen s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada

Perspectives on Carbon Emissions from uanadian arest Fire

The hectares spaced have increased by more than two and one-half times since 1981/82.

CANADA S 2008 GREENHOUSE GAS INVENTORY A Summary of Trends:

Forestry and Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum # Shepherdstown, WV

SINKING THE CLIMATE: WILL CANADA S APPROACH TO FORESTS AND LAND USE SINK THE KYOTO PROTOCOL? Chris Rolfe, Staff Counsel West Coast Environmental Law

4. In 1992 the Canadian government shut down fisheries due to over fishing.

Manitoba s Submission Guidelines for Peatland Recovery Plans

Forest Carbon Sequestration and Mitigation

Analysis of Woody Vegetation Clearing Rates in Queensland. Supplementary report to Land cover change in Queensland

Carbon sequestration: Forest and soil

4.2.5 Afforestation and Reforestation

Social Studies 10-1 Chapter 13: Impacts on the Environments To what extent does globalization affect the environment?

ISSUE: CANADIAN FOREST PRODUCTS: CONTRIBUTING TO CLIMATE CHANGE SOLUTIONS

A n O ve r v i e w o f O t h e r J u r i s d i c t i o n a l A p p ro a c h e s t o C a r b o n A P A S C a r b o n S u m m i t.

Waste Wood, Wasted Opportunity: The Value of Carbon in British Columbia

Deforestations in Switzerland as reported under the Kyoto Protocol Art. 3.3

The province has been divided into six Fire Management Zones based on common management objectives, land use, fire load, and forest ecology.

Understanding Your Environment:

ASSESSING THE PROSPECTS FOR CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN THE MANUPALI WATERSHED, PHILIPPINES

Performance Modeling for Space-based Observations of Forest Fires using Microbolometers

Forest Accounts.

Chapter 9: Other Land CHAPTER 9 OTHER LAND IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 9.1

Forest Accounts. Outline. Why accounts? 1. Land Accounts 2. Forest Asset Accounts 3. Supply and Use Accounts

Narration: In this presentation you will learn about various monitoring methods for carbon accounting.

Limber Pine and Whitebark Pine Recovery in Alberta

FOREST CARBON MANAGEMENT POLICY BRIEF

National Climate Change Process SINKS TABLE OPTIONS PAPER. Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry in Canada and the Kyoto Protocol

Saskatchewan s Climate Resilience Measurement Framework

Climate Change and Sustainable Forest Management in Canada

Forest Carbon Management:

The Forest Resources Management (Saskatchewan Environmental Code Adoption) Regulations

Research Manitoba Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Reduction Targets, Reporting, Actions

Accounting Options for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry - Forest Management

Projecting impacts of climate change on reclaimed forest in the mineable oil sands

Digging Into the Costs of Short Rotation Coppice Crops in Canada

Forest Carbon and Silviculture

About cows and trees -Policy implications of the 2030 EU climate and energy framework on agricultural and forestry sectors

Natural Systems Planning Primer

Cervid Ecological Framework June 2009

TECHNICAL SUPPORT DOCUMENT # 1 COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE SITES APPENDIX TDS#1-G. Agriculture Component

Facts and Figures 2016

Guidance Document HOME ENERGY CALCULATOR

Baseline survey for agroforestry projects

Application of remote sensing by the New Zealand forest industry. Aaron Gunn

Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry. Waking-up Northern Ontario s Bioeconomy

Ecological Benefits of Habitat Modification

Private Woodland Owners - Meeting the Stewardship Challenge

Transcription:

SState of Ontario's Forests - Indicator Report Criterion 4 Monitoring Forest Contributions to Global Ecological Cycles Element 1 Monitoring Forest Carbon Balance Indicator 3 Monitoring Deforestation Indicator Condition State Trend Data Forests sequester and store significant amounts of carbon that are released into the atmosphere when forested lands are converted to other land uses. This deforestation reduces the global capacity to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Accounting for carbon emissions due to deforestation is mandatory by Article 3.3 of the Kyoto Protocol. Therefore deforestation is included as an indicator to monitor forest contributions to global ecological cycles. A total area of 52,423 ha is estimated to have been deforested in Ontario from 2001-2007. The rate of deforestation in northern Ontario decreased over the 2001-2008 period. Just under 17% (8,856 ha) of province-wide deforestation occurred in southern Ontario, particularly in areas of high urban development. Estimated deforestation in Ontario from 2001-2008. Page 1 of 7

Background The conversion of forests to other land uses causes a release of carbon into the atmosphere; restoring land to forest use allows atmospheric carbon to be stored in trees, other vegetation and forest soils. Based on Article 3.3 of the Kyoto Protocol, which requires reporting of carbon emissions from deforestation, area of land deforested was identified as an indicator for monitoring carbon cycles in Ontario s forests. The Kyoto Protocol defines deforestation as the conversion of forested land to non-forested land as a direct result of human activity (NRC 2009). This includes clearing land for agriculture, urban development, transportation infrastructure (roads, railway lines) and industrial activities like mining, electric power generation etc. Forest harvesting is not considered deforestation; the forest is re-established after harvest. Forested land used for forest access roads is considered to be transportation infrastructure and therefore accounted as deforestation. Discussion The state was rated as poor. The total estimated area of deforestation in Ontario for the period from 2001-2007 is 52,423 ha. Average annual deforestation has increased from approximately 6,800 ha from 1990-2000 to approximately 7,500 ha for the period 2001-2007. The estimate of deforestation due to increases in forest road infrastructure in northern Ontario was just over 83% (43,567 ha) of province-wide deforestation. From 2001 to 2007, a total area of 8,856 ha was deforested in southern Ontario. Deforestation rates were highest around Ottawa, along the north shore of Lake Ontario and around Barrie (Fig. 4.1.3a). Southern Ontario s average annual deforestation has risen from about 790 ha per year (1990-2000) to approximately 1,265 ha per year in the current reporting period. Page 2 of 7

The proportion of the productive forest area of northern Ontario (OMNR 2006) deforested was 0.02% per annum during this reporting period, while in southern Ontario there has been a 0.06% per annum loss of productive forest area due to deforestation (OMNR 2006). The trends were rated as deteriorating. The amount of annual deforestation in northern Ontario increased from 1990 to 2002 from approximately 5,500 to just over 7,000 ha (Figure 4.1.3b). Since 2002 annual deforestation has trended downward, reaching approximately 4,900 ha in 2008. Compared to the time period 1990-2000, annual average deforestation in the province increased from 6,831 ha to 7,489 ha. Some difference is attributable to a revised methodology (see below). There is a recent improving trend in northern Ontario since 2002, however this estimate is based on active forest management and does not include deforestation effects of mining, electrical power generation development or urban expansion. There are no data for assessing within-period trends for southern Ontario, but the annual deforestation rate has increased from 790 ha per year in the time period 1990-2000 to 1,265 ha per year for 2001-2007. The data were rated as partial. Southern Ontario estimates were based on a sample of the whole area for periods that did not precisely match the reporting period; therefore data were extrapolated. In some ecodistricts, the sample sizes and number of deforestation events observed were very small. In northern Ontario only deforestation due to roads was included; no deforestation data were available for the effects of mines, pits, quarries, electrical generation facilities or expanding urban areas. Forest harvest areas and roads are reported by the forest industry and data appear in some instances to be incomplete or are not reported in a timely manner. Page 3 of 7

There is some variance in the deforestation estimates based on road construction because of institutional changes. In 2004 there was a change in the reporting system for forest roads, which may have caused some under-reporting. In 2005 there was a provincial subsidy offered for forest roads (Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry 2010), which may have influenced the amount of road building in subsequent years. Data Figure 4.1.3a: Average rate of deforestation in southern Ontario from 2001-2007. Estimates are based on average deforestation within sampled areas, mapped by ecodistrict. Page 4 of 7

8000 7000 6000 Area Deforested (ha) 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 0 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 Year Figure 4.1.3b: Area deforested annually in Northern Ontario due to forest road construction (thin line) and estimates of area deforested based on harvested areas (thick line, based on the ratio of harvested area to constructed road length for 2005-2007). Methods In southern Ontario, estimates of deforestation were derived from detecting differences in land cover in two sets of satellite and aerial photography images. The first image was dated between 1999 and 2002 and the second image between 2006 and 2007. This forest change interpretation was done by the Canadian Forest Service (CFS) for national forestry reporting and carbon accounting (Leckie, et al. 2006, 2009). CFS has generously allowed our use of the data for this provincial State of the Forest Report. Forest change data were collected for sample areas based on a systematic sampling grid. Deforestation events were defined to have a minimum size of one hectare on sites where mature trees could grow to a height of at least five metres. Page 5 of 7

To estimate total deforestation within southern Ontario, average annual deforestation rates were calculated for the areas sampled within each ecodistrict. Deforestation rates were then extrapolated to the total land area of the ecodistrict and the time period of reference. Deforestation events for northern Ontario were based on forest harvesting activities and roads constructed as a result of these. Harvested areas were not considered deforested because they are expected to grow back naturally or through active regeneration. From 2004-2008, data were available for both the area harvested and area of roads constructed. These data were used to estimate a ratio of forest loss due to road construction and area harvested. It was found that on average 3.3% of the harvested area may be considered deforested due to road construction. This number was used to estimate deforestation within northern Ontario based on annual harvest area data available for the period 1990-2003. These estimates therefore differ from those published in the State of the Forest Report 2006. Deforestation due to mining, urbanization, and agriculture among other agents are not included. Deforestation is under-reported for northern Ontario but probably not to a significant extent considering the ratios of forest lands to lands used for these other activities. Southern and northern Ontario estimates were added together to determine the total area deforested. The indicator will be updated every ten years. Other Reading Environment Canada 2010. National Inventory Report 1990 2008: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada. Cat. No.: En81-4/2008E-PDF Greenhouse Gas Division, Environment Canada, Ottawa. URL: http://www.ec.gc.ca/publications/default.asp?lang=en&xml=492d914c-2eab-47ab-a045- C62B2CDACC29 Colombo, S.J., W.C. Parker, N. Lukai, Q. Dang and C. Teibo. 2005. The effects of forest management on carbon storage in Ontario s forests. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Applied Research and Development Branch, Sault Ste Marie, ON. Climate Change Research Report CCRR-03. 126 pp. URL: http://www.ontla.on.ca/library/repository/mon/13000/256532.pdf Page 6 of 7

Literature Cited NRC. 2009. Forest Carbon Accounting Definitions. Natural Resources Canada, Ottawa, ON. URL: http://carbon.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/definitions_e.html. Accessed July 2010. OMNR. 2006. Forest Resources of Ontario 2006. Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Sault Ste Marie, ON. URL: http://www.mnr.gov.on.ca/en/business/forests/publication/mnr_e005106p.html. Accessed December 2010. Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines and Forestry. Provincial Roads Funding Program. URL: http://www.mndmf.gov.on.ca/forestry/prfp_e.asp. Accessed December 2010. Leckie, D., D. Paradine, W. Burt, D. Hardman and S. Tinis. 2006. Deforestation Area Estimation for Canada: Methods Summary. Report DRS-Q-001, Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, BC. Leckie, D.G., A. Dyk, D. Paradine, D. Tammadge, and S. Tinis. 2009. Deforestation Interpretation Guide (Version NIR 2011). Report DRS-M-016, Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forest Service, Natural Resources Canada, Victoria, BC. Authors Dr. Bruce Pond Flora Hofmann Page 7 of 7