Carpet Waste Gasification:

Similar documents
The Enerjetik RJ2 Gasifier. Do we finally have the right gasifying system for the Ceramic Industry?

Small Heating Systems. What it takes to burn well

Scott Hume. Electric Power Research Institute, 1300 West WT Harris Blvd, Charlotte NC 28262

GASIFICATION THE WASTE-TO-ENERGY SOLUTION SYNGAS WASTE STEAM CONSUMER PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION FUELS HYDROGEN FOR OIL REFINING FERTILIZERS CHEMICALS

EVALUATION OF AN INTEGRATED BIOMASS GASIFICATION/FUEL CELL POWER PLANT

Repowering Conventional Coal Plants with Texaco Gasification: The Environmental and Economic Solution

Co-Production of Fuel Alcohols & Electricity via Refinery Coke Gasification Ravi Ravikumar & Paul Shepard

Ronald L. Schoff Parsons Corporation George Booras Electric Power Research Institute

The Production of Electricity Power from Biomass. Image Source: National Agroforestry Center, Canada

PRECOMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY for Coal Fired Power Plant

Incineration (energy recovery through complete oxidation) Mass Burn Refuse Derived Fuel Pyrolysis Gasification

Geothermic Fuel Cell Applications in Coal Coal Gasification---Coal to Liquids (Summary Highlights)

Dry Low-NOx Combustion Technology for Novel Clean Coal Power Generation Aiming at the Realization of a Low Carbon Society

The Cost of Mercury Removal in an IGCC Plant

Introduction: Thermal treatment

Green is Seen in Fertilizers Municipal Solid Waste Management. Carrie Farberow Kevin Bailey University of Oklahoma May 1, 2007

Pyrolysis is the thermal degradation of residual municipal waste in the absence of air to produce a solid fraction and syngas.

BC HYDRO AND POWER AUTHORITY BIOENERGY PROJECTS TECHNOLOGY REVIEW

Module 4: Gaseous Fuel. Lecture 28: Water Gas

Pre-Combustion Technology for Coal-fired Power Plants

CALCIUM LOOPING PROCESS FOR CLEAN FOSSIL FUEL CONVERSION. Shwetha Ramkumar, Robert M. Statnick, Liang-Shih Fan. Daniel P. Connell

The ARK Reformer. Animal Litter. Synthetic Crude Oil Synthesis Gas (SynGas) Fertilizer Biomass. Solid Waste. Waste to Fuel

Performance Evaluation of a Supercritical CO 2 Power Cycle Coal Gasification Plant

Gasification & Water Nexus

CHAPTER 3 BENEFITS OF BETTER BURNING

INDIRECT INCLINED FLAMMING PYROLYTIC REACTOR GASIFIER (IIFPRG) FOR WASTE TO ENERGY APPLICATIONS

DEVELOPMENTS IN HARNESSING OF BIO-MASS POWER

Chapter 13. Thermal Conversion Technologies. Fundamentals of Thermal Processing

POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION: LOCAL EFFECTS AND IT S CONTROL Vol. II - Clean Coal Technologies - Bingjiang Liu

Coal Gasification Study

Technical Description Package Micro Auto Gasification System (MAGS )

Steam Gasification of Low Rank Fuel Biomass, Coal, and Sludge Mixture in A Small Scale Fluidized Bed

Clean Coal Technology

A Closer Look At Condensing Boiler Efficiency PART-II

Synthetic Fuel Substitutes for Thermal Oxidizers Increased Sustainability, Reduced Natural Gas Consumption

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

NEW TECHNOLOGIES IN COAL-FIRED THERMAL POWER PLANTS FOR MORE EFFECTIVE WORK WITH LESS POLLUTION

The Production of Syngas Via High Temperature Electrolysis and Biomass Gasification

An Integrated Approach to the Recovery of Fiber, Chemicals and Energy from Fibrous Textile and Carpet Waste

Module 4 : Hydrogen gas. Lecture 29 : Hydrogen gas

Technology Overview. Renewable Natural Gasification - RNG: How It Works:

Process simulation activities at Politecnico di Milano on Ca-based solid looping cycles

C R. ombustion esources, Inc. Evaluation of Stratean Inc. Gasifier System. 18 March Consultants in Fuels, Combustion, and the Environment

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

Drying of High-Moisture Coals For Power Production & Gasification

Simultaneous Removal of SO 2 and CO 2 From Flue Gases at Large Coal-Fired Stationary Sources

Simulation of Low-Btu Syngas Combustion in Trapped Vortex Combustor

State of the Art (SOTA) Manual for Stationary Gas Turbines

Technologies for CO 2 Capture From Electric Power Plants

Clean Coal Technology

Can Coal-fired Power Plants Compete with NG-fired GTCCs?

New Power Plant Concept for Moist Fuels, IVOSDIG

Production of Electricity and/or Fuels from Biomass by Thermochemical Conversion

Supercritical Water Coal Conversion with Aquifer-Based Sequestration of CO 2

Chemical Looping Gasification Sulfur By-Product

Methanol Production by Gasification of Heavy Residues

Improving Flexibility of IGCC for Harmonizing with Renewable Energy - Osaki CoolGen s Efforts -

Paper Mill Repowering with Gasification

OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE AND CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS.

Development and optimization of a two-stage gasifier for heat and power production

Meyer Steinberg Vice President and Chief Scientist HCE LLC, Melville, NY

Modelling of syngas production from municipal solid waste (MSW) for methanol synthesis

Feature: New Project Development Using Innovative Technology

Combined Cycle Gasification Plant

FUEL- OXYDANT FLEXIBLE COMBUSTION

The International Gas Research Conference IGRC-2014 September 17-19, 2014, Copenhagen, Denmark

FABRICATION OF GASIFIER

Development of Foster Wheeler s Vision 21 Partial Gasification Module

THE WABASH RIVER IGCC PROJECT REPOWERING COAL FIRED POWER PLANTS

Lecture 4. Ammonia: Production and Storage - Part 1

ADVANCES in NATURAL and APPLIED SCIENCES

Chapter Five Waste Processing, Treatment and Recycling Joe Green Dr Chris Wooldridge Cardiff University

What resources do we have?

APPLICATION OF BGL GASIFICATION OF SOLID HYDROCARBONS FOR IGCC POWER GENERATION

Design Optimisation of the Graz Cycle Prototype Plant

HOW PYROLYSIS WASTE TO ENERGY WORKS

Plastics Recycling. Datchanee Pattavarakorn Industrial Chemistry, Science, CMU

Appendix H: Air Quality (Task 5.3.6) H.8 Emissions Study: ORC Compared to Open Flaring

CO 2 and NO x Emissions Reduction in Combustion Systems

Energy Efficiency Strategies Waste Heat Recovery & Emission Reductions

How the City of Lebanon TN Implemented Gasification for Biosolids Disposal and Power Generation

Questions. Downdraft biomass gasifier. Air. Air. Blower. Air. Syngas line Filter VFD. Gas analyzer(s) (vent)

1. Process Description:

Swirl chamber for vitrification of fly ashes

The Role of Engineering Simulation in Clean Coal Technologies

How can Biomass Gasification Help You?

High-efficiency low LCOE combined cycles for sour gas oxy-combustion with CO[subscript 2] capture

Thermo-chemical conversion of biomass a route for liquid fuels. S Dasappa Indian Institute of Science Bangalore

The Effects of Operation Parameters on the Performance of Entrained-bed Pulverized Coal Gasifier with High Fusion Temperature Coal

Clean Coal Technology Roadmap CURC/EPRI/DOE Consensus Roadmap

The Production of Electricity Power from Natural Gas. Image Source: Mscalora

Nuclear Hydrogen for Production of Liquid Hydrocarbon Transport Fuels

BELTRAN TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Process gas cleanup from Coal and Municipal Gasification. By Duane S Abbott Beltran Technologies, Inc.

Energy Balances and Numerical Methods Design Project. Production of Maleic Anhydride

Atmospheric Emissions from Stationary Combustion Turbines

PTAC PROCESS TECHNOLOGY II - SYSTEMS. Last Reviewed: Page 1 of 10

Introduction. Ridge Road Transfer Station Ridge Road, Cleveland

UPDATE ON THE KEMPER COUNTY IGCC PROJECT Gasification Technologies Conference

Correctly Modeling and Calculating Combustion Efficiencies In Fired Equipment

Transcription:

Carpet Waste Gasification: Technical, Economic, Environmental Assessment for Carpet Mills ENGR4300 University of Tennessee at Chattanooga May 6, 2011 Project Team: Jordan Buecker Christopher Burns Katharine Davis Hemali Dholakia Kevin O Brien

Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 1 2 Introduction 2 3 Process Flow Diagrams and Descriptions 2 3.1 Air Gasifier... 2 3.2 Oxygen Gasifier... 3 3.3 Steam Gasifier... 4 4 Components 6 4.1 Cyclone Separator... 7 4.2 Gas Turbine... 7 4.2.1 Fuel Conditioning for Gas Turbine... 7 5 Material Balances 8 6 Environmental Analysis 11 7 Economic Analysis 12 8 Discussion 13 9 Conclusions 13 10 Recommendations 13 11 References 13

Executive Summary 1

Introduction With the cost of fuel ever increasing and the current push towards going green, new and innovative methods must be developed to reclaim and recycle usable energy from previously untapped resources. Post-consumer carpet waste (PCC) is carbon based material and can be gasified to produce syngas. With a heat of combustion similar to coal, syngas enables much usable energy to be reclaimed from the carpet rather than losing that energy to a landfill. It is our goal to provide a means for carpet manufactures to reclaim some of the energy in the carpet that comes back to them for consumer recycle/disposal. The method chosen to accomplish this is gasification and production of synthesis gas (syngas). Three main types of gasifiers exist and are explored in this report. The gasifiers explored are: air gasifier, oxygen gasifier and steam gasifier. Process flow diagrams and descriptions are shown in section 3. Process Flow Diagrams and Descriptions Air Gasifier Figure 1 shows the process flow diagram (PFD) for the air gasifier. 2

Figure 1: PFD for air gasifier As presented in Figure 3, the air and carpet waste enter the gasifier where they react to produce syngas and calcium oxide (CaO). The CaO/syngas mixture then enters a cyclone separator where they are separated. The CaO is stored for later disposal and the syngas is sent to a combustion/boiler unit for the production of steam. Oxygen Gasifier The oxygen gasifier operations identically to the air gasifier except there is need to have nearly pure oxygen as a reactant rather than air. Figure 2 shows the PFD for an oxygen gasifier. 3

This image cannot currently be displayed. Figure 2: Oxygen gasifier Steam Gasifier The steam gasifier uses steam as the reactant with carpet. The syngas produced by this gasification process contains methane and has a higher heating value than syngas produced by air and oxygen gasification. Because of the higher heating value, the syngas can be used to power a gas turbine for production of electricity. Figure 3 shows the PFD for the steam gasifier. 4

Figure 3: Steam gasifier Uses for Syngas Current use Currently, for PCC, the syngas produced is combusted in a boiler to produce steam for facility use. Figure 4 shows the current industrial use for carpet manufacturers. 5

Figure 4: Current PPC-produced syngas usage. As discussed in section 3.3, the syngas can be combusted in a gas turbine to produce work. The exhaust from the gas turbine can then be captured to produce steam, which will drive a stream turbine. The steam turbine may be non-condensing or condensing. If it is non-condensing, the steam turbine exhaust can be used for facility use. Figure 5 shows use of syngas in a gas turbine combined with a steam turbine. Figure 5: Use of syngas with gas and steam turbines Components 6

Components described in Figures 1-5 are described in this section. Cyclone Separator Cyclonic separation utilizes a difference in mass between two streams typically a fluid (air) and solid. The mixed stream of fluid and particulate enter the separator tangentially and the inertia of the mass of the particulate causes it to strike the wall of the separator and fall to the bottom. The fluid stream has sufficiently small inertia and can follow the wall of the separator radially [1]. Figure 4 shows a typical cyclone separator. Figure 4: Cyclone separator [1]. The separation efficiency increases with the ratio of length to diameter and with particle size (mass of particle). Gas Turbine Fuel Conditioning for Gas Turbine Contaminants in the turbine fuel stream can be harmful to the turbine and affect performance. Fuel conditioning is often required. Fuel conditioning for use with gas turbines involves removing small particulate matter, excess water, nitrogen, and other undesired gaseous contaminants. Filtering through an ultra-fine particle or membrane filter is usually the standard method for fuel conditioning [2]. Because work produced by a gas turbine is driven by the temperature difference, heating or cooling of the fuel stream may also be a part of fuel conditioning. Figure 5 shows a possible configuration for a turbine fuel gas conditioning system. Here, the crude fuel gas enters a preheater/cooler and then splits to go to one of two filters. After filtration, the streams recombine and go into a second preheater/cooler and then go to the 7

turbine for combustion. Figure 5: Turbine fuel gas conditioner [2] Material Balances The material balances for the gasifiers are modeled assuming the reactions associated with each go to completion. The oxygen and air gasifiers have five reactions which are assumed to take place, while the steam gasifier has six. The five general reactions are listed below: 1. PET (polyethylene terephthalate): 2. SBR (Styrene butadiene rubber): 3. N66 (Nylon 6-6): 4. PP (Polyproylene): 5. CaCO 3 (Calcium Carbonate): 8

The additional reaction for the steam gasifier is the reaction of the carbon monoxide with the steam (water) present to produce methane and carbon dioxide. 6. Methane Production: 2 2 Although some carbon monoxide (part of the syngas) is used up to produce methane, the syngas which includes methane has a higher LHV than one containing just CO and H 2 in normal amounts. To accompany these PFDs, Tables 1, 2, and 3 show the material balance for the air, oxygen and steam gasifiers, respectively. A basis of 10,000 lbs PCC per hour per each of two gasifiers is used. The initial carpet composition is 35% ash (CaCO3), 12% polypropylene (PP), 11% SBR, and 42% face fiber; the fiber is composed of 40% N6, 33% N66, 15% PET, and 12% PP [3]. Assuming all N66 and 80% of the ash are removed prior to gasification, the carpet composition flow rates in the following tables were estimated. ChemCAD software was used in modeling the gasifiers. Table 1: Material balance for air gasifier Carpet Air Post Gasification Temperature (F) 70 70 1740 Pressure (psia) 14.7 14.7 14.7 Composition Flow Rates (lb/h) 1,700 PP 700 CaCO3 4,460 O2 16,800 N2 500 H2 16,900 N2 1,400 N66 390 CaO 630 PET 8,900 CO 1100 SBR HHV (BTU/lb) 1,140 Volumetric Flow Rate Syn Gas (scfh) 450,000 The carpet and air are mixed and sent to the gasifier at 70 F and 14.7 atm. The temperature of 9

the stream leaving the gasifier is 1740 F. The flow rate of the syn gas including N2 is 450,000 standard cubic feet per hour. Table 2: Material balance for oxygen gasifier Carpet O2 Post Gasification Temperature (F) 70 70 1830 Pressure (psia) 14.7 14.7 14.7 Composition Flow Rates (lb/h) 1,700 PP 700 CaCO3 1,400 N66 630 PET 1100 SBR 4,460 O2 500 H2 170 N2 390 CaO 8,900 CO HHV (BTU/lb) 1,140 Volumetric Flow Rate Syn Gas (scfh) 221,000 The carpet and O2 are mixed and sent to the gasifier at 70 F and 14.7 atm. The temperature of the stream leaving the gasifier is 1830 F. The flow rate of the syn gas including N2 is 221,000 standard cubic feet per hour. Table 3: Material balance for steam gasifier Carpet Steam Post Gasification Temperature (F) 70 212 1080 Pressure (psia) 14.7 14.7 14.7 10

Composition Flow Rates (lb/h) 1,700 PP 700 CaCO3 1,400 N66 630 PET 1100 SBR 3,850 H2O 630 H2 110 O2 170 N2 390 CaO 6,900 CO 1,200 CH4 HHV (BTU/lb) 3,470 Volumetric Flow Rate Syn Gas (scfh) 250,000 The carpet and steam are mixed and sent to the gasifier at 212 F and 14.7 atm. The amount of energy required to heat the steam is 350 MBtu/hr which includes a 10% loss. The temperature of the stream leaving the gasifier is 1080 F. The flow rate of the syn gas including N2, CH4, and O2 is 250,000 standard cubic feet per hour. Environmental Analysis To assess the environmental performance of the three gasification designs, energy production, water consumption, and pollutant emissions were analyzed. All calculations are based on 4,430 lb PCCW/hr (10,000 lb PCCW/hr with N6, SBR, and 80% of CaCO3 removed) fed to each of two gasifiers. Water consumption is only applicable to the steam gasifier which requires 3850 lb H20 (460 gallons) per hour per gasifier to gasify the 4430 lb PCCW/h. Energy production is based on the composition of the syngas produced by each gasifier. Using the HHV for each syngas composition and an assumed efficiency for the energy recovery system, the amount of energy produced is approximated. For the air and oxygen gasifiers, an efficiency of 25% is assumed for the steam generator; for the steam gasifier, an efficiency of 40% is assumed for the combined cycle. Energy production estimates are in Table 4. Possible pollutants are carbon dioxide and nitrogen oxide. Assuming all of the carbon entering the gasifier is released as CO2, 2700 lb CO2/hr will be emitted per gasifier. Assuming a flame temperature of 1950C (2223K), nitrogen oxide emissions can be approximated at 180 ppm (see Figure 6). See Table 4 for a summary of these estimations. Table 4: Water consumption, energy production, and emissions for 20,000 lb PCCW gasification Gasifier Type Water Consumed Energy Produced (BTU/hr) CO2 Emitted NOx Emitted 11

AIR 290 OXYGEN 290 5,400 lb/hr 180 ppm STEAM 920 gal/hr 1390 Figure 1: NOx emission vs. Adiabatic flame temperature (from industrialheating.com) Economic Analysis The estimation of capital costs was completed using the module costing technique. This technique factors in the equipment type, system pressure, and materials of construction as multiples that adjust base costing conditions. The computer program CAPCOST 2008 was utilized for the generating the estimates shown below in Table 5. The program generates an estimate using the parameters entered by the user. Table 5: Cost estimate Type Equipment cost Bare Module Cost Gasifier $688,000 $1,730,000 Cyclone Separator $99,400 $149,000 12

Packaged Steam Boiler $733,000 $1,590,000 Total Bare Module Cost $3,469,000 The estimate in Table 5 is for a gasifier system to produce syngas to be burned for steam generation. Further use of the steam for electricity generation will be determined later in the design process. Discussion Conclusions Recommendations References 1. Cyclonic Separation. Accessed electronically. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/cyclonic_separation>. 2. EML Manufacturing, LLC. Fuel Gas Conditioning. Accessed electronically. <http://www.emlmanufacturing.com/fuel_gas_conditioning.htm>. 3. Shaw report <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/adiabatic_flame_temperature> accessed May 4, 2011 <http://www.industrialheating.com/articles/feature_article/566ce7aa44cb7010vgnvcm100000f932a8 c0 > accessed May 4,2011 <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/heat_of_combustion#lower_heating_value_for_some_organic_compoun ds_.28at_15.4.c2.b0c.29> accessed May 4, 2011 Energy Efficiency & Industrial Boiler Efficiency: An Industry Perspective. <http://cibo.org/pubs/whitepaper1.pdf> accessed April 25, 2011 <http://www.naturalgas.org/environment/naturalgas.asp> accessed May 4, 2011 13