Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 2001

Similar documents
Evaluation of Tillage and Crop Rotation Effects in Certified Organic Production McNay Trial, 2002

Comparison of Organic and Conventional Corn, Soybean, Alfalfa, Oats, Rye Crops at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research (LTAR) Site-2000

Comparison of Organic and Conventional Crops at the Neely-Kinyon Long-Term Agroecological Research Site

Evaluation of Organic Corn and Popcorn Varieties and Fertilization

Comparison of Organic and Conventional Crops at the Neely-Kinyon Long-term Agroecological Research Site

Evaluation of Organic Barley Varieties and Organic No-Till Soybean Demonstration, Southeast Research Farm, 2017

Four Tillage Methods of Soybeans Annual Report North Central Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education Program

On-Farm Organic Corn Hybrid Trial, 2008

Evaluation of an Organic No Till System for Organic Corn and Soybean Production Agronomy Farm Trial, 2011

Evaluation of an Organic No Till System for Organic Corn Production Neely-Kinyon Farm Trial, 2011

Effect of Cover Crops for Weed Management in Organic Vegetables Neely-Kinyon Trial, 2005

Four Tillage Methods for Soybeans Annual Report North Central Sustainable Agriculture Research & Education Program

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2016 Full Report

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley

Evaluation of Organic Pest Management Treatments for Bean Leaf Beetle and Soybean Aphid, Neely-Kinyon-2013

Evaluation of Organic Pest Management Treatments for Bean Leaf Beetle and Soybean Aphid, Neely-Kinyon-2014

Soil Amendment and Foliar Application Trial 2015 Full Report. Overview:

The Nutrient Value of Manure: What s it Really Worth? Brad Joern Department of Agronomy

Cover Crops Strategies After Short Season Crops

Do new corn hybrids and yield levels influence potassium fertilizer management?

Nitrogen dynamics with a rye cover crop

WET WEATHER WOES. Corn

Manure and Cover Crop Best Management Practices:

EVALUATION OF COVER CROP TERMINATION METHODS IN CORN PRODUCTION

Evaluation of Organic Pest Management Treatments for Bean Leaf Beetle and Soybean Aphid Neely-Kinyon Trial, 2011

Evaluation of Foliar-Applied Insecticides in Soybean

Western Illinois University/ Allison Organic Research Farm Cover Crop/ Corn Yield Experiment

How do cover crops affect whole farm profitability?

Cover Crops: Potential Role in Nutrient Management & Establishment Methods

Monoculture Annual Crops & Tillage Tough on the Soil. Integrating Cover Crops into the Northern Corn Silage System

Effect of Crop Stand Loss and Spring Nitrogen on Wheat Yield Components. Shawn P. Conley Cropping Systems Specialist University of Missouri, Columbia

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial ROW WIDTHS

Soybean and Corn Hybrid Variety Performance Under Organic and Conventional Systems

UTILITY OF POLYMER-COATED UREA AS A FALL-APPLIED N FERTILIZER OPTION FOR CORN AND WHEAT

COVER CROPS AND NUTRIENT CYCLING. Matt Ruark University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Wisconsin-Extension

IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF RYE COVER CROP SYSTEMS

Organic Row Cropping Systems, Cover Crops, and Soil Health

Long term impact of soybean rust on the Midwest corn-soybean rotation system

Corn Responds Positively to Rate & Timing of Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) & Urea

Economics of Cover Crops

High-Yielding Soybean: Genetic Gain Fertilizer Nitrogen Interaction

ARKANSAS WHEAT Jason Kelley - Wheat and Feed Grains Extension Agronomist September 13, 2017

2013 Purdue Soybean On-Farm Trial SEEDING RATES

Effect of a rye cover crop and crop residue removal on corn nitrogen fertilization

Literature Survey of Studies Comparing Organic vs. Conventional Farming Methods

Corn Production: A Systems Approach. Sandy Endicott Senior Agronomy Manager, Canada and Latin America

Field Crops. Research. Underseeded vs. Mid-Summer-Seeded Green Manures for Corn. Cooperator:

Corn and Soybean Practices following Severe Drought. Roger Elmore and Andy Lenssen Department of Agronomy, ISU

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota in 2010 and 2011 Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Bruce Potter, Jeff Irlbeck and Jodie Getting, University of Minnesota Department of Entomology and Southwest Research and Outreach Center

LIMITED IRRIGATION OF FOUR SUMMER CROPS IN WESTERN KANSAS. Alan Schlegel, Loyd Stone, and Troy Dumler Kansas State University SUMMARY

Objectives: Background:

Cover Crop Considerations. Charles Ellis Extension Natural Resource Engineer Lincoln County Extension Center

Evaluating Corn Row Spacing and Plant Population in thetexas Panhandle

1,700 beneficial insect species for every 1 pest species!

Posted March 21, 2003: Effective weed control involves more than good timing or having the right tools.

Environmental Benefits and Management of Small Grain Cover Crops in Corn-Soybean Rotations

Nitrogen input decisions with tight crop production margins

FIELD EXPERIMENT HISTORY

LIQUID SWINE MANURE NITROGEN UTILIZATION FOR CROP PRODUCTION 1

Cover Crops and Soil Health

High-Yielding Irrigated Soybean Production North Central USA Soybean Benchmarking Project

Impacts of 4R Nitrogen Management on Drainage Water Quality

Corn Variety Trial 2012, Pershing County

On-Farm Evaluation of Twin-Row Corn in Southern Minnesota (2010 to 2012) Stahl, Lizabeth A.B. and Jeffrey A. Coulter

Cover Crop Seeding Methods. Charles Ellis Extension Natural Resource Engineer

THE 2014 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

Nutrient uptake by corn and soybean, removal, and recycling with crop residue

Growing degree days and growth requirements for Corn.

Evaluation of Organic Pest Management Treatments for Bean Leaf Beetle and Soybean Aphid Neely-Kinyon Trial, 2010

2017 Research Report. How competitive are interseeded cover crops in corn?

2013 Agronomic Impacts Iowa Water Conference March 5. John Holmes Extension Field Agronomist

Growing An Excellent Silage Crop

DELINEATION OF HIGH RISK FIELD AREAS FOR VARIABLE SOURCE N FERTILIZER APPLICATIONS TO OPTIMIZE CROP N USE EFFICIENCY

CORN NITROGEN RATE RESPONSE AND CROP YIELD IN A RYE COVER CROP SYSTEM. Introduction

THE 2016 OHIO SOYBEAN PERFORMANCE TRIALS

RURAL CONSERVATION CLUBS PROGRAM CHARING CROSS CONSERVATION CORPORATION "Manure Management in High Residue Applications" FINAL REPORT

Diversified crop rotations balance productivity, profitability, and environmental quality

This presentation is available at Borges, University of Wisconsin Agronomy

AGRONOMY 375 EXAM II. November 7, There are 15 questions (plus a bonus question) worth a total of up to 100 points possible. Please be concise.

Cover Crops and Soil Health

2017 FIELD CROP BUDGETS Publication 60

Evaluation of Fertilizer Additives for Enhanced Nitrogen Efficiency in Corn. Final Project Report (2013 and 2014)

Cover Crops. PFI Conference Cover Crops 101 Saturday Jan. 12, 2013 Ames, IA

Cover crops versus good rotation vs no-till. Bill Deen Department of Plant Agriculture

2018 FIELD CROP BUDGETS Publication 60

Soybean Response to Seeding Rates in 30-Inch Row Spacing

Western Illinois University/Allison Organic Research Farm. Tillage/Cover Crop Experiment

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AGRONOMY DAY. agronomyday.cropsci.illinois.edu

Tillage Systems and Soil Conservation for Corn-on-Corn. Tony J. Vyn, assisted by colleagues, graduate students, technicians, and farmers

over Crops and Grazing

Purdue On-Farm Nitrogen Rate Trial Protocol

Corn Stand Establishment

Q1 Name of applicant

Green Bean Production and Management

2017 Cover Crop Story Chris & Ryan Lee Fairfax, MN

Between a Rock and a. Hard Place. Corn Profitability

Wet soils and Soybean Blights

Fits, Misfits, and Mightfits On-farm cover crop demonstrations in Michigan Cropping Systems

Transcription:

Evaluation of Corn, Soybean and Barley Varieties for Certified Organic Production-Crawfordsville Trial, 21 Dr. Kathleen Delate, assistant professor, Dept. of Horticulture & Agronomy Kevin Van Dee, farm superintendent, Southeast Research and Demonstration Farm Heather Friedrich, research associate, Dept. of Horticulture & Agronomy Noreen Wantate, research associate, Dept. of Horticulture & Agronomy Introduction Organic farming has increased to an $8 billion industry in the U.S. and continues to expand approximately 2% annually. In Iowa alone, organic acreage for all crops has increased from 13, in 1995 to 12, in 1998. Organic corn production in 1997 was reported at 9,92 acres. International demand for organic products, particularly from the Japanese and European markets, is also on the rise. Farmers interested in transitioning some or all of their land into organic production require information on best management practices for these systems. Once the transition is complete, comparable yields to conventional systems can be obtained. In addition, organic products garner a 2-3% premium price in the marketplace, with organic corn, for example, averaging a 2% premium price over conventional corn in 21. Soil health, maintained through crop rotations, organic matter additions (manure/compost), and cover crops, has been the basis of successful organic farming. In the fourth year organic trials at the Southeast Research Farm, we examined the performance of four soybean and corn varieties, and two barley varieties under organic management. A locally produced, inexpensive, renewable resource for fertilization (hog manure), and mechanical methods for weed control were used, as required for certified organic production. Materials and Methods Organic plots at the Southeast Research Farm follow a rotation of corn-soybeanbarley/red clover started in 1998. Treatments in 21 at the Southeast Research farm consisted of three varieties of corn, soybeans and two varieties of barley with 4 replications of each variety. Corn seed was provided by NC+ Organic and varieties included NC+ 3869 (18 day maturity), 2919 (13 day), and 3448 (16 day). Corn plots were planted on June 13, 21, at a population of 29,9 plants per acre. Corn was planted in 3-in rows to a depth of 2 inches in plots measuring 5 x 185 ft. The 2 corn plots were planted to a cover crop of rye (1bu/ac) following harvest on October 16, 2. The rye was killed in the spring by mowing the rye then disking on June 11, 21. Three clear-hilum soybean varieties were planted on June 18. These varieties included IA 311, IA 36 and Pioneer 935. Soybeans were planted in 3 rows to a depth of 1 in plots

measuring 12.5 X 18. Planting densities varied with the Iowa State varieties at 243, plants per acre and Pioneer 935 planted at 218, plants per acre. Barley and red clover plots were interseeded on April 13, 21. Barley was planted at 2bu/acre and red clover at 12 lb/acre. Barley varieties included Robust and Kewaunee with Cherokee red clover as an underseeding. Fertilization for the corn plots was provided through liquid hog manure that was broadcast at a rate of 3, gal/acre on April 13, 21. This application period corresponded with the requirement that raw manure be applied at least three months prior to harvest for agronomic crops. Analysis of this manure included 4 pounds of nitrogen per 1, gallons of manure to supply approximately 12 pounds of N/ac. No insecticides, fungicides or herbicides were applied in keeping with organic standards. Weeds in corn plots were managed through two rotary-hoeings on June 18 (5 DAP) and 23, and three row cultivations on June 3, July 6, and 13. Soybean weeds were managed through two rotary-hoe operations on June 23 (5 DAP) and 27, and four row cultivations on July 6, 13, 23 and 31. A core set of measurements was taken on three subsamples per plot for crop stand counts (July 3) and weed counts before the first cultivation and after the last cultivation (July 3, 18, Aug. 1). Insect damage was quantified by observing corn borer damage in corn (July 18) and counting bean leaf beetles in soybean (Aug. 1, Sept. 7). Stalk nitrate content and soybean cyst nematode samples were both taken on Oct. 11. Soybean plots were harvested on October 19, while corn was harvested on October 26, 21, with a combine equipped with a scale to quantify yields. All measurements were subjected to analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD test. Results and Discussion Due to weather constraints, planting was delayed in 21, resulting in lower yields than previous years. Corn yields were not significantly different among varieties, averaging 119 ± 1.7 bu/acre (Fig. 1). There were no significant differences among varieties in stand counts at 2 days after planting (Fig. 2). Stand counts averaged 22, plants/acre after three tillage operations. Grass and broadleaf weed populations on July 3 (2 DAP) and 18 (36 DAP) were not significantly different among the varieties (Fig. 3 and 4, respectively). There was little damage due to corn borers on July 18 and no corn borer larvae were found. Stalk nitrate content was significantly greater in variety NC+ 3869 compared to NC+ 3448 (Fig. 5). Grain analysis found significant differences in protein, oil, starch, and density (Fig. 6). The highest protein content was found in NC+ 3448 (7.5 ±.1%) while NC+ 2919 had the lowest oil content (2.9 ±.5). The greatest starch content was found in variety NC+ 2919 (6.18 ±.13%). Soybean variety P935 yielded significantly greater than varieties IA 36 and IA 311 (Fig. 7). Soybean yields ranged from 37.5-42.7 bu/ac. Plant stands on July 3 (15 DAP) 2

were greatest in variety P935 with 158, ± 3449 plants per acre, after two tillage operations (Fig. 8). Weed populations were not significantly different among the varieties on July 3 (Fig. 9), before the first cultivation and Aug. 1, after the last cultivation (Fig. 1). An increasing problem in soybeans in recent years is soybean staining associated with the bean leaf beetle. Bean leaf beetle populations were monitored and the percentage of staining in the soybeans was determined. The bean leaf beetle population on Aug. 1 had an average of 3.25 ±.5 beetles per 2 sweeps with no significant differences among the varieties (Fig. 11). By Sept. 17, the second generation of bean leaf beetles had emerged and there was an average of 224.1 ± 22.7 bean leaf beetles per 2 sweeps (Fig.12). Pioneer 935 had significantly lower staining that both Iowa State soybean varieties (Fig. 13). The numbers of soybean cyst nematode was not significantly different among the varieties. The average population, 17.8 ± 79.9 eggs/1 cc, remained below the economic threshold (Fig. 14). Significant differences in grain quality were found among the varieties for the percentage of protein, oil and carbohydrates (Fig. 15). Variety IA 311 had the highest level of protein while P935 had the highest percentage of oil and carbohydrates. Barley was harvested on July 1. There were no significant differences in yield between the varieties. Kewaunee yielded 26.5 ± 4.9 and Robust yielded 28.3 ± 3.7. Acknowledgements We would like to thank the Leopold Center for Sustainable Agriculture for their support of this research. Thanks also go to Matt Hunt, Andrea McKern, Jenny Petersen, Nate Lindsey, Joy Hodge, Gustavo Bastos and Sergi Sans for their help on production, data collection and analytical aspects of this project. Thanks also to Charles Hurburgh and the ISU Grain Quality Lab for grain analysis, and to NC+ Organic, Cal-West Seeds, and Pioneer Hi-Bred International for providing seeds for this study. 3

15 1 Bu / acre 5 NC+ 3869 NC+ 2919 NC+ 3448 Figure 1. Corn yields, SERF, 21. 25 2 Plants per acre 15 1 5 NC + 3869 NC + 2919 NC + 3448 Figure 2. Corn plant population, SERF, 21. Weeds / m 2.5.4.3.2 NC + 3869 NC + 2919 NC + 3448.1 Grasses Broadleaves Figure 3. Corn weeds July 3, SERF, 21. 4

.5 Weeds / m 2.4.3.2 NC + 3869 NC + 2919 NC + 3448.1 Grasses Broadleaves Figure 4. Corn weed population, 7/18 SERF 21. 15 PPM N-NO 3 1 5 NC+ 3869 NC+ 2919 NC+ 3448 Figure 5. Stalk nitrate content, SERF, 21. 8 NC + 3869 6 NC + 2919 NC + 3448 Percent 4 2 Density Oil Protein Moisture Starch Figure 6. Corn grain analysis, SERF, 21. 5

5 4 Bu / acre 3 2 1 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Figure 7. Soybean yields, SERF, 21. 2 15 Plants / acre 1 5 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Figure 8. Soybean plant population, SERF, July 3, 21. Weeds / m 2 4 3 2 1 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Grasses Broadleaves Figure 9. Soybean weed population, SERF, July 3, 21. 6

2 Weeds / m 2 1.5 1.5 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Grasses Broadleaves Figure 1. Soybean weed population, SERF, August 1, 21. 6 Bean leaf beetles / 2 sweeps 5 4 3 2 1 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Figure 11. Bean leaf beetle population, SERF, August 1, 21. 6 Bean leaf beetles / 2 sweeps 5 4 3 2 1 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Figure 12. Bean leaf beetle population, SERF, September 17, 21. 7

8 6 Percent stain 4 2 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Figure 13. Percentage of stained soybeans, SERF, 21. 5 4 Eggs / 1 cc 3 2 1 IA 311 IA 36 P935 Figure 14. Soybean cyst nematodes, SERF, 21. 5 Percent 4 3 2 IA 311 IA 36 P 935 1 Fiber Moisture Oil Carbohydrate Protein Figure 15. Soybean grain quality, SERF, 21. 8