Design Features of Constructed Wetlands for Nonpoint Source Treatment. September 1995

Similar documents
Constructed Wetland Use in Nonpoint Source Control

4. Ponds and infiltration BMPs can achieve 60 to 100% removal efficiencies for sediment.

Design Strategies for Stormwater Wetlands to Maximize Plant Diversity

National Management Measures to Protect and Restore Wetlands and Riparian Areas for the Abatement of Nonpoint Source Pollution

ORDINANCE # 854. Stormwater Management / Operation and Maintenance Requirements

Introduction. Wetland System. A Wetland Scene at Lorne C. Henderson Conservation Area near Petrolia

Controlling runon and runoff:

The Importance of Riparian Forests

The Construction General Permit and Erosion Prevention and Sedimentation Control

Riparian Buffers for Water Resource Protection

How Climate Change Impacts Urban Runoff and Water Quality Design

VIDEO: Riparian Forest Buffers: The Link Between Land & Water

Jason R. Vogel, Ph.D., P.E. Biosystems and Agricultural Engineering Oklahoma State University

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW

Wetland Resources Cultural, Historical and Environmental Significance

Constructed Wetland Pond T-8

Streamside Management. How the area around your pond effects the water.

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW Mississippi Dr Coon Rapids, MN SQ FT Residence on 0.64 Acre Lot

12/9/2011. Constructed Wetlands. Functions, Design Criteria

BMP 5.4.2: Protect /Conserve/Enhance Riparian Areas

Temporary Watercourse Crossing: Fords

BMP #: Infiltration Basin

E. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT

Maintaining Riparian Areas and Wetlands

Wetland Design Manual. Supporting document: Wetland form and function

Deep River-Portage Burns Waterway Watershed 2015

Standard for Wet Ponds

Appendix X: Non-Point Source Pollution

Natural and Engineered Wetlands for Stormwater Management

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. Spring Lake Park Schools Westwood Middle School st Avenue NE, Spring Lake Park, MN 55432

Stormwater Management in Your Backyard: Stormwater 101

Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission Wetland 639W Outlet Modifications Summary Feasibility Report

Watershed Hydrology: Go with the flow. Greg Jennings, PhD, PE

2017 Agricultural Water Quality Workshop

CHAPTER 15 WATER POLLUTION. INTO THE GULF Researchers try to pin down what s choking the Gulf of Mexico

Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances STORM WATER AND EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL

TABLE B.3 - STORMWATER BMP POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES

CLMP+ Report on Grass Lake (Anoka County) Lake ID# CLMP+ Data Summary

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW th Ave NE Ham Lake, MN 55304

orking Trees for Water Quality

Freshwater Wetlands: Functions & Conservation. ENVIRTHON Workshop 2016 University of Massachusetts Amherst Deborah J.

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW. KTJ 314, LLC Blaine, MN 55449

Stormwater Management. Cayuga County NY 20 July 2016 Presenter : John B. Zepko, CPESC

Lake Creek Watershed Management Plan Public Meeting. Arrowhead Lake May 3, :00 PM

SW-74 SERENOVA PRESERVE SITES 2, 3, 4, 8 MITIGATION PLAN

Stormwater Erosion Control & Post-Construction Plans (Stormwater Quality Plans)

Saturated Buffer. Subsurface Drainage PURPOSE N REDUCTION LOCATION COST BARRIERS

Wetland Monitoring. City of Edmonton. Edmonton Wetlands Workshop December 4-5, 2013

VILLAGE OF BELLAIRE WATER QUALITY ACTION PLAN

Cost/benefit Analysis Stormwater Detention Pond Maintenance Controls Demonstration Project. Objective

Maitland Valley WATERSHED

WATERSHED. Maitland Valley. Report Card 201

WQ-08 ENHANCED DRY SWALE

Riparian Areas. 101 An overview. Prepared by: Jacque Sorensen, M.Sc. TRU Department of Natural Resource Sciences

Regional Watershed Planning. Calumet Summit 2010: A Call to Connect Calumet Conference Center April 27, 2010

POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES FOR TYPICAL STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS IN FLORIDA

Typical Local Erosion Control Requirements (Storm Water Management Authority, Inc.)

Constructed Wetland Channel T-9

Contractors, Illicit Discharges, & Best Management Practices. Chris Allen Stormwater Inspector

ALMY POND TMDL MANAGEMENT PLAN

Monitoring Stormwater Best Management Practices: Why Is It Important and What To Monitor

CEAA ENVIRONMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT AMBASSADOR BRIDGE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT. Replacement Span and Plaza Expansion APPENDIX E

Upper Mississippi River Basin Environmental Management Program Workshop

Pennsylvania Stormwater Best Management Practices Manual. Chapter 3. Stormwater Management Principles and Recommended Control Guidelines

ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION IN COASTAL MISSISSIPPI: MARSH RE-ESTABLISHMENT PROJECT HARRISON AND JACKSON COUNTIES, MISSISSIPPI

COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMIT REVIEW th Lane NE East Bethel, MN 55005

Suitable Applications Where concentrated flow of surface runoff must be conveyed down a slope in order to prevent erosion.

Scheduling Maintenance for Dry Ponds

Hydrology 101. Impacts of the Urban Environment. Nokomis Knolls Pond Summer June 2008

BLOCKING AND FILLING SURFACE DRAINAGE DITCHES

Guidance on each of the 23 basic elements follows: Plan Index showing locations of required items: The plan index should include a list of the

4. What is Item A called? a. Eckman dredge b. Secchi disk c. Van Dorn sampler d. Ponar sampler

CHAPTER 1. Ecological Integrity

Guidance Document for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Submittal. A2 Plat showing building lot numbers/boundaries and road layout/names:

Shelbyville, Kentucky Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) Stormwater Pollution Treatment Practices (Structural) DRAFT

EVALUATION - SECTION 404 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENTS FROM OR THROUGH A DAM

MCM 5 - POST CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT

OCEANS AND AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS- Vol. I - Geographic Information Systems Applied to the Analysis of Riparian Buffer Zones and Lakes - Norio Tanaka

Appendix C: Wetland Functional Values Assessment Methodology

Regulatory Requirements

Grass Channel STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SUITABILITY KEY CONSIDERATIONS

AP Environmental Science

Nonpoint Source Pollution A Challenge to Control

Chapter 2: Conditions in the Spring Lake Watershed related to Stormwater Pollution

BMP #: Water Quality Inserts

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/13/2016. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

Earth s Water. 97% Salt 3% Fresh

Lake Samish Comprehensive Stormwater Plan Capital Improvement Recommendations

Hydrology and Water Quality. Water. Water 9/11/2018. Molecular Water a great solvent. Molecular Water

D EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. Table of Contents

The soil is a very. The soil can. The manure. Soil Characteristics. effective manure treatment system if manures are applied at the proper rate.

THE WATERSHED The watershed is an area of land that drains into a stream. This includes both the surface runoff and groundwater. Because a stream is m

Temporary Stream Crossing

Temporary Stream Crossing

Shallow Lake Ecology and Management. Todd Call Shallow Lakes Program

APPENDIX C. STORMWATER STRUCTURAL BMP DESCRIPTIONS

4.12. Detention Basins

COTTONWOOD CREEK RECLAMATION PHASE I & II

Shower Curtain Watershed

WETLAND DEVELOPMENT: A GREEN TECHNIQUE FOR REMEDIATION OF GANGA POLLUTION AT KANPUR CITY. Department of Botany BND College, Kanpur

Transcription:

Design Features of Constructed Wetlands for Nonpoint Source Treatment September 1995

Brochure written by William W. Jones, School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana. Production funds were provided, in part, by a Section 319 Grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Revised September 1997

Design Features of Constructed Wetlands for Nonpoint Source Treatment What is a constructed wetland? Wetlands have been constructed to treat a variety of liquid wastes including secondary wastewater treatment facility effluent, mine wastes, septic system effluent, stormwater, and nonpoint source (NPS) pollution. This may involve restoring previously drained wetlands or constructing new wetlands in appropriate areas. This brochure provides guidance on the use of constructed wetlands to treat nonpoint sources such as excess runoff, eroded soil, and nutrients. A word of caution is necessary natural wetlands should not be used to treat NPS pollution without first obtaining necessary permits and conducting a thorough environmental assessment to insure that the wetland can support the necessary treatment without becoming degraded. Likewise, using wetlands for treating toxic wastes is not recommended without extensive evaluation. How do constructed wetlands work to reduce NPS pollution? Constructed wetlands provide storage capacity for runoff water within their basins. In addition, organic soils found in mature wetland systems act like a sponge to retain water and allow infiltration into the groundwater. This decreases not only total runoff volume but also peak discharges which may otherwise cause flooding or erosion downstream. As channelized flow enters a wetland, the velocity is reduced as the water spreads out over the wetland. Velocity is further reduced by the frictional resistance of aquatic vegetation. It is this reduction in velocity which is most responsible for sediment and nutrient retention in constructed wetlands. As the velocity of flowing water slows, it loses the energy needed to keep particles in suspension, and these particles and associated nutrients then settle out. Nutrients such as phosphorus and Channel without wetland FLOODFLOW ALTERATION Increased volume for water storage Wetland Infiltration nitrogen are trapped and retained in constructed wetlands by several mechanisms: burial in sediments, chemical breakdown (e.g., denitrification and ammonia volatilization), and through assimilation

by aquatic plants and SEDIMENT AND NUTRIENT RETENTION bacteria. The primary mechanism for phosphorus removal is adsorption to wetland soils and precipitation Flow reactions with calcium, aluminum, and iron. In most cases, phosphorus Physical retention of inorganic sediments retention by vegetation Chemical retention of nutrients is only seasonal as it is taken up by growing plants and released with vegetation die-back in the fall. How can you enhance the functioning of constructed wetlands? There are a number of design features that can increase the efficiency of constructed wetlands to trap and retain NPS pollutants. Loading Rate: Proper sizing of a constructed wetland in relation to its watershed is probably the most important factor affecting wetland performance. If the wetland is sized too small, water flow through the system can be too rapid for effective treatment. Too little water flowing through can result in stagnant water or temporary dry conditions. Primary plant productivity and decomposition rates are both higher in flowing water but high velocities discourage plant growth. Permanently flooded wetlands perform better than wetlands which dry out seasonally. Therefore, designing the hydraulic loading rate is critical. Ideally, for optimal performance, the size of the constructed wetland should be from 1% to 5% of the size of its drainage area. For example, a 25-acre watershed would require a 1-acre wetland. Designing hydraulic loading by analyzing existing channel discharge or watershed runoff coefficients is more precise than the 5% rule above. Phosphorus removal efficiency declines with increasing phosphorus loading. With high loading rates, adsorption sites become saturated and there is insufficient capacity for biotic assimilation. There are cases where overloaded wetlands have become phosphorus sources to downstream lakes. Hydraulic Retention Time: Hydraulic retention time refers to the length of time water remains in the constructed wetland. It is closely related to hydraulic loading rate. The longer water remains in the wetland the greater chance of sedimentation, adsorption, biotic processing and retention of nutrients. Proper sizing of the wetland is important but restricting the size of the wetland outlet is also effective. For wetlands with channel flow, the outlet cross sectional area should be less than 1/3 that of the inlet.

Water Velocity: Peak water velocities through the wetland should not exceed 1.5 feet/second. High velocities can wash out rooted vegetation and scour deposited sediments. Keep velocities low by regulating hydraulic loading, limiting the gradient (slope) through the wetland, restricting the outlet size, creating sinuous edges and planting persistent emergent vegetation. Ideally, flow velocities should be less than 0.6 feet/second. Soils: Fine-textured clay soils and soils with high organic matter content have more adsorption sites for retaining nutrients. Available calcium, aluminum, and iron in the soil enhance precipitation reactions with phosphorus. Water Depth: Water depths less than 40 inches result in greater resistance to flow and shallow depths favor aquatic vegetation. The preferred depth range for emergent plants is 0 1.0 feet of water; for rooted surface plants, 1.0 2.0 feet of water; and for rooted submersed plants, 1.5 6.5 feet of water. Pools deeper than 40 inches should also be included in the wetland design to maximize sediment deposition and provide winter fish habitat. Maximize Edge: Sinuous edges between the terrestrial and aquatic zones provide more resistance to flow and more edge habitat for plants and animals. Round wetlands have the least amount of edge per given surface area. Islands create additional edge plus they provide refuge from predation for nesting birds. Minimize Edge Slope: The terrestrial-aquatic boundary should have a very gradual slope. This allows for the establishment of a continuum of emergent species and reduces the erosive effects of waves hitting a sharp shoreline boundary. WETLAND HYDROLOGY CONTROLS Outlet Inlet Pool Cross sectional area Cross sectional area Pool Island Island

Persistent Emergent Vegetation: Persistent emergent vegetation has stems which persist even after the growing season. This provides year-round resistance to water flow. Persistent emergent plants include: cattail (Typha spp.), iris (Iris pseudacorus or I. versicolor), rush (Juncus spp.), cordgrass (Spartina spp.), reedgrass (Calamagrostis spp.), sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), and switch-grass (Panicum virgatum). Woody plants such as alder (Alnus spp.), buttonbush (Cephalanthus occidentalis), black willow (Salix nigra), and others are useful edge species with persistent stems. Aquatic bed or submergent vegetation removes nutrients seasonally but does not offer significant frictional resistance to suspended sediments. Pre-sedimentation Basin: Many constructed wetland designs incorporate a presedimentation basin to trap sediments and large particulates before they enter the wetland. This can extend the life of the constructed wetland and ultimately enhance treatment efficiency. Maintenance Constructed wetland planning should not overlook the need for long-term maintenance. Additional vegetation planting may be required to speed plant coverage, replace damaged plants or to try more suitable varieties. Perimeter fencing may be required if livestock grazing is anticipated to be a problem. Maintenance may be needed to control the spread of undesired plant species such as purple loosestrife. Inlets and outlets can become blocked with debris which will require periodic removal. Inlet and outlet structures should be inspected weekly and especially following big storm events. Most importantly, if the wetland functions well as a sediment and nutrient trap, it may eventually require dredging to remove accumulated materials. Thus, vehicular access to the site must be provided for maintenance vehicles and possibly dredging equipment. Useful References Hammer, Donald, A. 1992. Creating Freshwater Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Kadlec, Robert H. and Robert L. Knight. 1996. Treatment Wetlands. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Marble, Anne D. 1992. A Guide to Wetland Functional Design. Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Thunhorst, Gwendolyn A. 1993. Wetland Planting Guide for the Northeastern United States Plants for Wetland Creation, Restoration, and Enhancement. Environmental Concern, Inc., St. Michaels, Maryland.