SOUTHERN INDIANA 2008 FLOODS: DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND WEB MAPPING

Similar documents
Remote Sensing Uses in Agriculture at NASS

Cropland Mapping with Satellite Data

To provide timely, accurate, and useful statistics in service to U.S. agriculture

EVALUATING THE ACCURACY OF 2005 MULTITEMPORAL TM AND AWiFS IMAGERY FOR CROPLAND CLASSIFICATION OF NEBRASKA INTRODUCTION

Remote Sensing for Monitoring USA Crop Production: What is the State of the Technology

ArcGIS Agricultural Land-Use Maps: The Mississippi Cropland Data Layer Fred L. Shore, Ph.D., Thomas L. Gregory, and Rick Mueller

Urban Monitoring of Spatial Development of Moscow State Region

Remote sensing applications in natural resources mapping and management An Indian Context

Collaboration of Space Research Institute NASU-SSAU with EC JRC on satellite monitoring for food security: background and prospects

Research and Conservation Opportunities Arising from a High Resolution LiDAR Mission for the Long Point Biosphere Reserve and Surrounding Region

Expert Meeting on Crop Monitoring for Improved Food Security, 17 February 2014, Vientiane, Lao PDR. By: Scientific Context

Utilization of the SWAT Model and Remote Sensing to Demonstrate the Effects of Shrub Encroachment on a Small Watershed

4. Present Activities and Roles

Dynamic Maps of Open Surface Water Bodies in Oklahoma at 30- m Spatial Resolution during

Research projects of Landuse changes in Latvia

Groundwater and Agricultural Bioenergy

Assessment of Agricultural Flood Damages Along the James River in South Dakota

Irrigation Impact and Trends in Kansas Agricultural 1

Estimating Soil Carbon Sequestration Potential: Regional Differences and Remote Sensing

Highway Surface Drainage

Image Classification I

Use of Remote Sensing to Measure Land Use Change from Biofuel Production

NERIN-Fire activities (ongoing and future)

Illinois in Drought. June 19, 2012, Updated June 21, 2012

Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Monarch. Buffer Strips. Habitat Restoration Planning using Riparian

Opportunities and challenges for monitoring tropical deforestation and forest degradation in dynamic landscapes using Sentinel-2!

Efficient Fertilizer Use Soil Sampling for High Yield Agriculture: by Dr. Harold Reetz

FOREST COVER MAPPING AND GROWING STOCK ESTIMATION OF INDIA S FORESTS

DMC 22m Sensors for Supertemporal Land Cover Monitoring. Gary Holmes DMC International Imaging Ltd June 2014

Identification of Agricultural Crops by Computer Processing of ERTS MSS Data

Object-oriented Classification and Sampling Rate of Landsat TM Data for Forest Cover Assessment. Yasumasa Hirata 1, Tomoaki Takahashi 1

Need Additional Information? LEGAL DISCLAIMER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

LAKE COUNTY HYDROLOGY DESIGN STANDARDS

Objectives of the Study

North Appalachian Expermental Watershed

Identification of Crop Areas Using SPOT 5 Data

Dynamics and Drivers of Land Cover & Land Use Changes in Bangladesh Integration of Satellite Data with Socioeconomic Dataset

INTRODUCTION cont. INTRODUCTION. What is Impervious Surface? Implication of Impervious Surface

Forest and land cover change detection is one of the major applications of satellite-based remote

JECAM and the Manitoba Super Site

Integrating Agricultural Land Management into a Watershed Response Model

Satellite image classification of vegetation and surface water for assessment of flood damage to agricultural crops

Emerging Technologies and Methods in Earth Observation for Agricultural Monitoring Feb. 13, 2018 National Agricultural Library

Agricultural Trip Generation - Linking Spatial Data and Travel Demand Modeling using SAS

Using Open Data and New Technology To Tackle the Greening of the CAP from a broader perspective

Production of the Missouri Land Cover Data Layer Brief Notes 1/00 DRAFT

Mangrove deforestation analysis in Northwestern Madagascar Stage 1 - Analysis of historical deforestation

Climate Data and Drought Research

Mapping smallholder agriculture using simulated Sentinel-2 data; optimization of a Random Forest-based approach and evaluation on Madagascar site

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF NDVI AND SAVI VEGETATION INDICES IN ANANTAPUR DISTRICT SEMI-ARID AREAS

AIMS pilot project. Monitoring the rehabilitation of degraded landscapes from Food Assistance for Assets programmes with satellite imagery

Figure Zimbabwe Crop Assessment Route

APPENDIX B. If the GRANIT Data Mapper gets stuck during an operation, use the refresh button in your browser.

Rapid Land Use and Land Cover Database Development

GFW Frequently Asked Questions

ACE 427 Spring Lecture 9. USDA Crop Reports. by Professor Scott H. Irwin

CropWatch Introduction and Crop Area Estimation

Outline of Presentation

CHANGES ON FLOOD CHARACTERISTICS DUE TO LAND USE CHANGES IN A RIVER BASIN

system that supports soil and crop water management.

Kansas Irrigated Agriculture s Impact on Value of Crop Production

Project Brief: Small Forestland Owner Parcel Identification and County GIS Data Compilation for Washington State WRIAs 23 & 49

Role of Remote Sensing in Flood Management

Assessment and mapping of GRASSLAND ecosystems condition and their services in Bulgaria, Contr. Д-33-90/

Landscape-Scale Postfire Vegetative Condition Monitoring Using Multi- temporal Landsat Imagery on the Cerro Grande Fire

AGRICULTURE & FOOD SECURITY. The Rangelands Decision Support Tool. Vegetation & Surface Water Monitoring

Estimating Groundwater Recharge within Wisconsin s Central Sands

A Hydrologic Study of the. Ryerson Creek Watershed

FOR SALE. Contact: Panola & Quitman Counties, Miss. Total Size Location. Description. Cropland Soils Improvements

SPACE MONITORING of SPRING CROPS in KAZAKHSTAN

Urban Ecosystem Analysis Roanoke, Virginia

MINIMIZING THE RISK OF MANURE RUNOFF THIS FALL/WINTER. Nichole Embertson, Ph.D. Whatcom Conservation District

Landsat 5 & 7 Band Combinations

An Agro-Climatic Zoning Approach to Achieve Optimum Agricultural Production in the Kurdistan Region, Iraq

Natural Resources & Environmental Stewardship

Naomi Feger SF Bay RWQCB January 6, 2017

Assessing Real Time - Drainage Water Management

Purdue University Department of Agronomy

Identifying and and Understanding Carbon Cycle Implications of of North American Natural and and Anthropogenic Disturbances:

Crop Monitoring in Australia Using Digital Analysis of Landsat Data

Turbidity Monitoring Under Ice Cover in NYC DEP

Interaction of weather and field variability on profitability in crop production

Rappahannock County Riparian Buffer Study. Submitted by: Center for Coastal Resources Management Virginia Institute of Marine Science.

TARGETING WATERSHEDS FOR RESTORATION ACTIVITIES IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY WATERSHED. Technical Documentation October 4, 2002

Mapping Potato Productivity over the U.S. Eastern Seaboard using a Geospatial Crop Model

MOBILE BAY. Darius Hixon (Project Lead) Austin Clark Tyler Lynn Manoela Rosa. Monitoring Marsh Conditions in Coastal Alabama. Conservation Initiatives

REMOTE SENSING, NORMALIZED DIFFERENCE VEGETATION INDEX (NDVI), AND CROP YIELD FORECASTING XIJIE LV THESIS

Laura Zanolli Geography Major/GIS/Geology/Water Resources Portland State University

Theresa M. Possley Nelson, PE. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Introduction to Surface Irrigation

New Tech Predicts Local Corn Supply. -The Opportunities and Limits of Statistical Ag Data-

STUDY ON SOIL MOISTURE BY THERMAL INFRARED DATA

Soil Map Lewis County, Kentucky (Denham Farm, Sand Hill/Trinity, Lewis Co., KY) Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey

1.6 Rainfed areas Areas that have no irrigation whatsoever and are precipitation dependent.

Evaluation of a method of estimating agricultural chemical use

2 Okanogan County Regional Setting

Environmental Resource Inventories. What are ERIs? Significance of information How to use them

Understanding Juniper Forest Encroachment into Grasslands in Oklahoma and the Impacts on Primary Production, Evapotranspiration, and Climate

Afforestation/Reforestation Afforestation/Reforestation Clean Development Mechanism Projects in Uttar Pradesh State August

Potential for Site Specific Management in Midwest Mint Production

Transcription:

SOUTHERN INDIANA 2008 FLOODS: DAMAGE ASSESSMENT AND WEB MAPPING Ejaz Hussain KyoHyouk kkim Jie Shan, Associate Professor {ehussain,kim458,jshan}@,j purdue.edu Tel:765-494-2168 School Of Civil Engineering Purdue University Feb 18, 2009 Flooding along White River in Daviess County, Background photo (courtesy of J. & R. Armes) 1

Acknowledgement Images provided courtesy of USGS Croplands data layer courtesy National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA Precipitation data courtesy National Weather Service Indiana GIS data courtesy Indiana map, IN.Gov 2

OUTLINE Flood development- rainfall data and pattern Methods Assessment Web mapping Conclusion 3

JUNE 2008 RAINFALL 30 th May,2008, 1-3 inches of rain caused light flooding in Wabash river 4 th -5 th June- 1-5 inches of rainfall developed into flooding in central and southern Indiana 6 th June another cycle of rain in central and eastern Illinois 7 th June, highest (official) rainfall of 9.5 inches in Center Point in Clay county June 1-7, 2008 about 7-10 inches of rain in Midwest Clay, Owen and Greene Counties This week-long rain caused flooding in the Wabash and White rivers Average June rainfall of 8 inches, about 4 inch above normal 4

JUNE 2008 FLOOD SEVERITY Disaster area State of emergency in 23 counties declared by the State Governor 39 counties of central Indiana declared as major disaster by the President of US About 51 counties were affected by the flood Initial Estimated loss of about 126 Million to 1 Billion $ 3 (three) persons dead 5

PRECIPITATION ON JUNE 1-7, 2008 Courtesy National Weather Service 6

PRECIPITATION ON JUNE 7, 2008 Courtesy National Weather Service 7

STUDY AREA-USGS GAGE STATIONS ALONG RIVERS 8

Feet 35 30 25 20 15 28.7 18 25.02 Water Levels for Wabash River 28.48 26.56 14 15 16 30.9 17.5 32.44 19 10 5 0 5.74 6.27 3.69 5 8-Jun 8-Jun 10-Jun 10-Jun 10-Jun 12-Jun Clinton,IN Terre Haute,IN Riverton,IN Hutsonville,IL Vincennes,IN Mount Carmel,IL Gauge Stations Levelyear07 LevelYear 08 Flood Stage An average of about 12 feet water level increase in about five days Courtesy USGS Highest water level recorded Mt Carmel, IL June 14,2008-33.24 feet ( remained 8 days above flood stage) 9

Fe eet 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Water Levels for White River 26.84 26.56 28.02 26.96 16 16 14 13 4.19 3.63 3.66 4.13 8-Jun 9-Jun 12-Jun 10-Jun Spencer,IN Newberry,IN Above Peterburg,IN Peterburg,IN Gauge Stations Level year 07 Level Year 08 Flood Stage Courtesy USGS 10

DATASET Landsat TM and ETM+ Images, June 9, 2007 and June 11, 2008 Coverage: South West Indiana Resolution-30 M, 7 Bands (Used 6 bands) Four scene of the same area for each year MODIS Images Pre flood -May 28, 29 - Two scenes Post flood- June 8 to June 19, 2008 14 scenes( seven cloud covered) Resolution-500 m, 7 Bands USDA cropland data layer-2007 Indiana GIS data- county boundaries, rivers, streams and floodplains INDOT roads and streets data 2005 11

STUDY AREA LANDSAT IMAGES LANDSAT TM_JUNE 09, 2007 LANDSAT TM_JUNE 09, 2007 LANDSAT TM- JUNE 11,2008 12

IMAGE CLASSIFICATION Two steps Analysis Segmentation-division of image into spatially continuous and homogeneous regions Classification-Classification of image objects rather than individual pixels, fuzzy rule based technique Use of spectral, contextual and texture features for classification Classification of 2007 and 2008 Landsat data Water, Vegetation, Open Area, Wet Areas and Built Up Areas For flood extent assessment Water No water 13

CLASSIFICATION RESULTS VIGO CLAY OWEN VIGO CLAY OWEN SULLIVAN GREENE SULLIVAN GREENE KNOX DAVIESS KNOX DAVIESS GIBSON PIKE GIBSON PIKE 20 0 20 40 Miles 20 0 20 40 Miles WATER_2007 WATER_2008 14

FLOOD EXTENT AND AFFECTED AREAS County Area (Hectares) Flooded area (Hectares) % Flooded area Vigo 106223.63 10208.81 9.61 VIGO CLAY OWEN Clay 93237.00 8271.91 8.87 Owen 100316.70 4359.36 4.34 SULLIVAN GREENE Sullivan 117464.82 6714.66 5.71 Greene 141291.13 14534.00 10.15 KNOX DAVIESS Knox 135653.03 20637.82 15.21 Daviess 113003.90 12708.89 11.24 Pike 88302.33 5994.00 6.79 GIBSON PIKE Total Flood area = 93,000 Hectares Excluding 2007 water 20 0 20 40 Miles 15

https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floodmaps 16

DAMAGE ASSESSMENT USDA CROPLAND DATA- 2007 Prepared in collaboration of NASS USDA,FSA and participating State s Governments VIGO CLAY OWEN SULLIVAN Focus on Corn, Soybean and Cotton GREENE agricultural regions in participating states. Digital categorized geo-referenced data layer of major crops acreage Resource SAT-1 (AWiFS) Indian Remote Sensing Satellite Resolution-56 m, 4 bands KNOX DAVIESS PIKE GIBSON 20 0 20 40 Miles 17

USDA CROPS DATA-2007 VIGO CLAY OWEN VIGO CLAY OWEN SULLIVAN GREENE SULLIVAN GREENE KNOX DAVIESS KNOX DAVIESS GIBSON PIKE GIBSON PIKE 20 0 20 40 Miles 20 0 20 40 Miles Corn Soybean Wheat Pasture Woods USDA Crops 2007 USDA Crops With_2008 Water Layer 18

CROPS DAMAGE ESTIMATE Assessment of damages to corn, soybeans, wheat, pasture/hay and forested area only Assumed the areas under same crops as in year 2007 and 100% planted before flood occurrence Results based on flood affected crops areas, not a measure of the degree of physical ldamage, some of these may recover but to what percentage? Degree of physical damages /recovery of crops will depend upon, Ponding time, Erosion, Partial or total submerge, Saturation period of soils/fields, ld Formation of dense surface crust, Deposition of mud on plants 19

CROP DAMAGE SUMMARY-NINE COUNTIES CROP S DAMAGE (%) IN THE INDIANA JUNE 2008 FLOOD % damage 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 16 16 16 4 8 4 14 11 11 12 6 5 6 5 5 2 2 7 3 0.3 31 23 18 4 4 19 20 2 6 12 17 18 8 5 6 16 16 14 8 1 2 3 1 Vigo Clay Owen Sullivan Greene knox Daviess Pike Gibson Counties Corn Soybean Wheat Pasture,Hay,Grass Forest,Shrubs 7 7 An average of about 15% of corn and soybeans areas affected by floods 20

CROP DAMAGE SUMMARY-NINE COUNTIES Crops area under flood (Hectare) Pasture, Forest, County Corn Soybean Wheat Hay Shrubs Vigo 3433.91 2480.58 16.57 1005.67 1389.36 Clay 3512.74 2842.43 14.41 843.10 668.00 Owen 1326.77 627.42 49.86 771.43 1375.58 Sullivan 2071.00 1080.13 40.46 789.23 1759.27 Greene 6569.6262 2834.4242 69.69 1000.63 2487.7272 Knox 9234.10 5299.93 132.17 579.29 2406.40 Daviess 6406.31 2646.57 132.18 1118.35 1192.62 Pike 2364.52 1393.75 5.31 228.21 1558.00 Gibson 3498.98 2523.37 68.46 715.55 2161.11 Total Area 38418.00 21728.60 529.12 7051.46 14998.00 21

CROPS DAMAGE MAP VIGO CLAY OWEN SULLIVAN GREENE Corn Soybean Wheat Pasture Woods KNOX DAVIESS GIBSON PIKE 20 0 20 40 Miles 22

FLOOD AFFECTED ROADS INDOT 2005 roads and streets data Roads passing through floodplains are mostly affected Flood affected roads includes, State Roads (SR 42, SR 246, SR 57, SR 157, SR 59) US Highway (US 231) County Roads and City streets 23

FLOOD AFFECTED ROADS VIGO CLAY OWEN VIGO CLAY OWEN SULLIVAN SULLIVAN GREENE GREENE KNOX DAVIESS KNOX DAVIESS PIKE GIBSON PIKE GIBSON 20 0 20 40 Miles INDOT ROADS 2005 20 0 20 40 Miles FLOOD AFFECTED ROADS 24

FLOOD AFFECTED ROADS 3000 2500 2000 2684 1825 2471 2481 2565 2207 1914 1776 1586 Km 1500 1000 500 0 110 78 34 74 147 238 147 174 80 Vigo Clay Owen Sullivan Greene Knox Daviess Gibson Pike Counties Roads INDOT- 2005 (km) Roads Under Flood (km) 25

http://www.in.gov/dot/gis/slo/roadclosetext.pdf pdf 26

FLOODPLAINS GENERAL VIGO CLAY OWEN VIGO CLAY OWEN SULLIVAN GREENE SULLIVAN GREENE KNOX DAVIESS KNOX DAVIESS GIBSON PIKE GIBSON PIKE 20 0 20 40 Miles 20 0 20 40 Miles FLOODPLAINS FLOOD WATER IN FLOODPLAINS 93000 Hectares FLOOD WATER OUT OF FLOODPLAINS 27 6000 Hectares

MODIS IMAGE FLOOD EXTENT VIGO CLAY OWEN SULLIVAN GREENE KNOX DAVIESS GIBSON PIKE 20 0 20 40 Miles MODIS 2008 MODIS FLOOD WATER 28

COMPARISON-LANDSAT - MODIS FLOOD EXTENT 20 0 20 40 Miles 20 0 20 40 Miles LANDSAT FLOOD WATER MODIS FLOOD WATER 29

Web Mapping Uncountable information is being produced by governments, universities, companies and individuals. These data can be shared and published to the public very effectively with web-based technologies and web-gis. Google Earth plug-in (web version of Google Earth) was used because of its powerful visualization functionalities, easiness and cost-effectiveness. 30

Google Earth plug-in Released in the end of May, 2008. Most of Google Earth visualization functionalities can be embedded into one s own website. Google Earth plug-in add-on is installed on client computer. Javascript library (GE-API) is provided for customization. Currently support the following OS and browser: -Windows 2000, XP, Vista (IE 6.0+,FireFox2.0+, Flock 1.0+) -Apple Mac OS X 10.4 and higher (Safari 3.1+,Firefox 3.0+) Data is published in KML or KMZ formats. 31

Brief function list Display of background imagery (satellite & aerial) provided by Google Earth Display of predefined layers (terrain, borders, roads and 3D models) Placement of KML, KMZ and 3D models Creation and placement of geometry objects (placemark, line and polygon) Mouse and keyboard event management for customization and user interface 32

Web interface https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floodmaps

Web interface https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floodmaps 34

Web interface https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floodmaps 35

Web interface https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floodmaps

Web interface https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floodmaps 37

Web interface https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floodmaps 38

CONCLUSIONS Floods Highest recorded rainfall of 10 and average of 4 above normal in June Near historic flood water levels average of about 12 higher than flood stage, lasted for 6 to 8 days Damages in both Wabash and White rivers 93,000 hectares of flood affected area, 67,000 hectares of crops area An average of 15 % damage to both Corn and Soybeans 1080 km of roads length ( different segments) submerged under water, mostly the county roads Knox, Greene and Daviess are worst hit, both in flood affected area and roads damage 6,000 hectares of additional flood affected area beyond the floodplain Data and maps Timely availability on internet ( flood maps) helps to quickly visualize the disaster impact, to plan remedial measures and flood affected area residents can view and assess the amount of flooding and damages to their properties 39

URL s View Flood Map at https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/academics/groups/geomatics/floo dmaps A Google Earth view is available at https://engineering.purdue.edu/ce/floodmaps/2008_flood_map.htm Contact: Prof. Shan, jshan@purdue.edu Demonstration 40

41