e-navigation workshop

Similar documents
Integrated Maritime Services

EMSA s Integrated Maritime Services: Improving Operational Maritime Awareness at EU level

The EU Maritime Safety Policy. Urban Hallberg European Commission Maritime transport policy: Regulatory questions, maritime safety and seafarers

National Single Window Prototype

EMSA s Integrated Maritime Services

Maritime and Coastguard Agency LogMARINE INFORMATION NOTE

082596/EU XXIV. GP. Eingelangt am 25/05/12 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 25 May /12 TRANS 177 MAR 75

e-navigation Frequently Asked Questions

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION. Blue Belt, a Single Transport Area for shipping

Maritime Single Window. INTRASOFT International s Solution for the Global Maritime Community

European Maritime Safety Agency MARITIME INFORMATION SERVICES CATALOGUE

12193/13 AV/cf 1 DG E 2 A

The AnNa Project MARITIME SINGLE WINDOW. Brisbane, 6 th May Implementing Directive 2010/65/EU

Maritime Navigation and Information Services MarNIS i.r.t. River Information Services

INTEGRATED MARITIME SERVICES OPERATIONAL AWARENESS ACROSS SECTORS AND SEAS

MARITIME SURVEILLANCE IN PRACTICE USING INTEGRATED MARITIME SERVICES

DUEPORT THE SPANISH MARITIME SINGLE WINDOW. International Maritime Organization Facilitation Committe - Forty First Session. London, 4 april 2017

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Electronic reporting in inland navigation

Portnet a National Single Window for Maritime Reporting Formalities in Finland

Reporting Formalities Directive

MARIN Seminar "VTS, een uitdagende toekomst"

MONITORING AND CONTROLLING SYSTEMS of the ships for safety and environmental protection

WP 4: Supervision, monitoring and control

Digital Transport and Logistics Forum (DTLF) Electronic Freight Transport Information (EFTI) European Maritime Single Window environment (EMSWe)

MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR VESSELS BOUND FOR OR LEAVING PORTS OF THE BALTIC SEA STATES AND CARRYING DANGEROUS OR POLLUTING GOODS

Challenges for maritime transport

National Single Window. Guidelines

Marine Asset Protection using AIS Data

MSW IMPLEMENTATION IN CROATIA

Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission

Bonn Agreement Action Plan

IMO; the facilitation and security of maritime transport

e-navigation Development in Russia, industry View

MONALISA Event Brussels 23 October

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to the COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Norwegian Coastal Administration

Use of ITS technologies for multimodal transport operations River Information Services (RIS) transport logistics services

STAD SHIP TUNNEL. Fire Protection & Safety in Tunnels conference Terje Andreassen, Project Manager. Vi tar ansvar for sjøvegen

APPLICATION OF SINGLE WINDOW CONCEPT. Implementation of an electronic system for the clearance of ships based on the single window concept

Training and cooperation

The implementation of e-navigation the further work on maritime single windows

REPORTING HAZMAT IN SAFESEANET OBTAINING ACCURATE INFORMATION ON DANGEROUS AND POLLUTING GOODS ON BOARD SHIPS

Introduction of Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) Technology

2010-EU S MIELE Multimodal Interoperability E-services for Logistics and Environment sustainability

SafeSeaNet Norway Users Guide CUSTOMS NOTIFICATION. Electronic Ship Reporting

Maritime Transport Single Windows: Issues and Prospects

State s Response to Wrecks Causing Environmental Risks

User survey on maritime communication security

European Maritime Transport Space without Barriers

Status on the IMO e-navigation process

28-30 November 2011, Zagreb, Croatia

Guidelines on reporting Hazmat in SafeSeaNet. Version 3

FACILITATION OF MARITIME TRANSPORT

EMSA pollution response services

The Republic of Kazakhstan

MONALISA in ICE (MICE) A Practical Approach to Sea Traffic Management in Ice Operations

WORK PROGRAMME. Submitted by Israel and Poland SUMMARY

Benefits of cooperation at the EU level:

Bulgarian Vessel Traffic Management and Information System and Education and Training of VTS Personnel in Bulgaria

Prof. Pietro del Rosso

EU e-maritime Initiative and Maritime ITS

New Sulphur requirements, Best Practice and the Way Ahead

MARITIME TRANSPORT AND EC LAW AND POLICY

Marine incidents involving HNS and EMSA s services for chemical spills HNS-MS Final Stakeholder Meeting

Maritime Safety Stakeholders in Information Exchange Process

Appendix B to Tender Specifications

Appendix B to Tender Specifications

Introduction of Japanese Single Window

COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT

TRANSAS STM SOLUTIONS

e-navigation: Do we need the IMO SIP? Dr Edward Hosken Head of Technical Engagement

TENDER SPECIFICATIONS ATTACHED TO THE INVITATION TO TENDER

e-navigation and practical applications to monitor and improve the Marine Transportation System

European Commission. Regulatory approximation in the transport sector. Anna Panagopoulou Directorate General Energy and Transport

ANNEX. BACKGROUND PAPER No. 4b. Improving European integration in maritime reporting, monitoring and surveillance

Activity 3. Support to Regulation Compliance in MoS. José García, Port Authority of Valencia B2MOS Mid Term Conference Valencia, 30 October 2014

TEST PROJECT ON COOPERATION IN EXECUTION OF VARIOUS MARITIME FUNCTIONALITIES AT SUB-REGIONAL OR SEA-BASIN LEVEL IN THE FIELD OF INTEGRATED MARITIME

REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. REFIT Adjusting Course: EU Passenger Ship Safety Legislation Fitness Check

European Maritime Safety Agency

STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 573 of 2010 EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (VESSEL TRAFFIC MONITORING AND INFORMATION SYSTEM) REGULATIONS 2010

E-navigation from theory to practical applications. Jon Leon Ervik Head of Department

RECOMMENDED ROUTE IN THE MOZAMBIQUE CHANNEL WESTERN INDIAN OCEAN (GEF) MARINE HIGHWAY DEVELOPMENT AND COASTAL AND MARINE POLLUTION PREVENTION PROJECT

Deliverable: D Information Management

Deliverable: D Information Management

IMO E-NAVIGATION UPDATE Transport Canada Marine Safety & Security

MARITIME AUTONOMOUS SURFACE SHIPS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW

ANNEX 1 RESOLUTION FAL.8(32) Adopted on 7 July 2005

Digital Ports past, present & future

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR MOBILITY AND TRANSPORT

Working Paper as a basis for reviewing and accordingly implementing the measures of the operational plans

Euro-Mediterranean cooperation in maritime transport

Linking Single Windows to Port Community Systems: The Valenciaport Case

OPERATIONS SEAFARER CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE NOTE SA MARITIME QUALIFICATIONS CODE VTS

Project Data Sheet BASIC PROJECT DATA. Full project title: Vessel Traffic Management Information System Phase 3. Short project title: (acronym)

SECTION 1: CURRICULUM SUMMARY. 1. Occupational Information. 1.1 Associated Occupation. 1.2 Occupation or Specialisation Addressed by this Curriculum

Technology systems in transportation corridors

EVALUATION ROADMAP DATE OF THIS ROADMAP PLANNED START DATE PLANNED COMPLETION DATE PLANNING CALENDAR

Automated information exchange between ship and shore

A8-0023/138. Knut Fleckenstein Market access to port services and financial transparency of ports COM(2013)0296 C7-0144/ /0157(COD)

Transcription:

e-navigation workshop EU initiatives related to the integration of the maritime information systems 1 17 and 18 October 2012 Haugesund, Norway Lazaros Aichmalotidis Head of Unit C.2 Vessel traffic and reporting systems

Traffic Monitoring Directive 2002/59 Large political pressure: One critical question How is it possible that we do not know what is sailing in front of our coastline Directive 2002/59/EC aims at establishing in the Community a vessel traffic monitoring and information system. SafeSeaNet (SSN) aims at developing a European Platform for Maritime Data Exchange between maritime administrations of the Member States (network for ship and cargo movements) Allow MS to react more efficiently in crisis situation

What is SafeSeaNet? A community vessel traffic monitoring and information system : It enables MSs, plus Iceland and Norway, to exchange information on vessel traffic and cargo movements 3 Initiated in October 2004, and became fully operational in 2009 Operated by EMSA at Central level, by MSs at national level Around 17,000 ships per day tracked in European waters Over 160,000 reports received per month Over 100 million AIS positions per month

Objectives of SafeSeaNet It enhances: maritime safety marine environment protection port and maritime security efficiency of maritime traffic and maritime transport 4

SafeSeaNet information sources Data providers AIS : on board AIS and shore based networks Masters /owners/ agents : port and HAZMAT notifications Local authorities (LCA) : VTS, MRCC, Port authorities, Coast guards, Pollution survey centres for incidents or accidents 5

Users of the system National Competent Authorities in the Member States decide which national users can access the system There are currently around 2000 users identified Users include: Maritime administrations Ports Vessel traffic Services Maritime Rescue Coordination Centres (MRCC) Coast Guards Pollution survey centres PSC Officers Other type of Users (Customs, border control, fisheries authorities, etc) 6

AIS shore stations connected to SSN North Atlantic Region 727+ EU AIS shore stations North Sea Region Baltic Region Coverage across all coastal Member States 7 Mediterranean Sea Region

Some 17.000 merchant ships around EU 8

Vessel and voyage details (AIS) 9

Details of dangerous cargo on board 10

Phased Development of SSN Legal basis supporting SSN developments SSN V.1 launched in 2004 (4 basic messages) SSN update to V.2 (1 January 2011) the interface with the MSs changed for the first time. New message, the PSC information (new reporting obligations - new logic) 11 Frther developments (V.3 Reporting Formalities Directive)(1 June 2015)

All notifications have a common part (IMO, MMSI, Call Sign and Name) plus additional information as required by the Directives. Information exchanged through SSN Member States receive notifications that shall forward to the EIS Port notifications Article 4 of Directive 2002/59 Hazmat notifications Article 13 of Directive 2002/59 Ship (MRS&AIS) notifications Article 9 of Directive 2002/59 12 Incident notifications Article 16 of Directive 2002/59 Security notifications Article 4 of Regulation 725/2004 Waste notifications Other Reporting Formalities Article 6 of Directive 2000/59 Directive 2010/65 obligations

Directive 2010/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States Purpose: simplify and harmonise the administrative procedures by making the electronic transmission of information standard and by rationalising reporting procedures.

ANNEX of the Reporting Formalities Directive Part A messages resulting from EU Legal Acts Notification for ships arriving in and departing from EU ports - Article 4 of 2002/59/EC Border checks on persons - Article 7 of Reg. No 562/2006 Notification of dangerous goods carried on board - Article 13 of 2002/59/EC Notification of waste and residues - Article 6 of 2000/59/EC Notification of security information - Article 6 of Reg. 725/2004 Entry summary declaration - Article 36a Reg. No 2913/92 14

ANNEX of the Reporting Formalities Directive Part B - FAL forms resulting from international legal instruments FAL form 1: General Declaration FAL form 2: Cargo Declaration FAL form 3: Ship's Stores Declaration FAL form 4: Crew's Effects Declaration FAL form 5: Crew List FAL form 6: Passenger List FAL form 7: Dangerous Goods Maritime Declaration of Health 15

Directive s main elements reporting formalities requested in a harmonised and coordinated manner by MSs MSs shall accept electronic reports and their transmission via a SW No paper forms allowed after 1 June 2015 all information reported once and made available to various competent authorities and MSs SW interoperable, accessible and compatible with SSN

EMSA pilot projects: IMDatE bring together existing EMSA systems (SSN, CSN, the EU LRIT, THETIS) and other external systems (S-AIS) benefits in terms of economies of scale and efficiency of data usability a user entitled to access the SSN, CSN, EU LRIT CDC and THETIS applications could have access to all four systems on the same geographical background via a single interface connection, instead of dealing with each of them separately SSN CSN LRIT Thetis

Single and multi-source ship tracks AIS, Satellite AIS, and LRIT AIS S-AIS LRIT LRIT

Blue Belt Objective Provide custom authorities with vessel voyage information with an added degree of certainty regarding the ship whereabouts 19 Stimulate Short Sea Shipping and contribute to facilitating vessels operating on intra-eu trading routes Ships to be able to operate freely within the internal market with a minimum of administrative burden

E-mail dispatch of Blue Belt report 20

E-mail report content List of ship calls 21 Voyage summary Bremerhaven to Felixstowe

SSN/VMS pilot project Combine AIS/VMS picture 22

SSN and e-maritime (new possibilities) SSN can be further expanded to support: Improved information exchange A2B and B2A SSN information accessible to shipowners, agents, masters Develop tools and applications (common models and services coordinated at EU level) Support Cargo tracking and tracing Monitoring application (compliance at COLREG, speed limits, TSS, suspicious vessels, etc) Support data fusion tools.

SSN as a platform for integrating maritime information systems AQUAPOL MAOC-N others EUROSUR MARSUR others Blue Belt CleanSeaNet LRIT THETIS VMS Law Enforcement Border Control Defence Customs Maritime Environment Maritime Safety & Security Fisheries Control 24 VMS Coastal radar images Other AIS sources SafeSeaNet based on Member States infrastructure LRIT CleanSeaNet images Single Windows Adding functionalities S-AIS

WHAT WILL e-navigation DELIVER? 1. Onboard navigation systems to benefit from the integration of own ship sensors, supporting information, a standard user interface, and a comprehensive system for managing guard zones and alerts. 2. The management of vessel traffic and related services from ashore will be enhanced through better provision, coordination and exchange of comprehensive data in formats that will be more easily understood and utilised by shorebased operators in support of vessel safety and efficiency. 3. An infrastructure designed to enable authorised seamless information transfer onboard ship, between ships, between ship and shore and between shore authorities and other parties with many attendant benefits. 25

Differences and similarities Similar objectives (SSN more focus to shore functions while e-navigation to both with particular emphasis to ship) SSN is a system based on EU legal basis and initiatives while e navigation is IMO concept SSN could support the core objectives of the e- Navigation to some extend. SSN standardisation ashore could be considered as a good regional example 26