Gas-Water-Rock Interactions in Saline Aquifers Following CO 2 Injection: Results from Frio Formation, Texas, USA

Similar documents
Geochemistry of Water and Gases in the Frio Brine Pilot Test: Baseline Data and Changes During and Post CO 2 Injection

Water-rock-CO 2 interactions for CO 2 geological storage

Carbon extracted from coal or other fossil fuel. where it came from. An elegant solution - will it work?

Carbon extracted from coal or other fossil fuel. where it came from. An elegant solution - will it work?

AQUIFER STUDIES RELATED TO GEOLOGIC STORAGE OF CO 2

New Developments: Solved and Unsolved Questions Regarding Geologic Sequestration of CO 2 as a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Method

Evaluation of Groundwater Quality Changes in Response to CO 2 Leakage from Deep Geological Storage

Results from baseline and

(Project No. 4265) Periodic Report No. 2, Period covered: Nov Jan 31, 2011

ScienceDirect. Shallow hydrogeological and hydrochemical characterization of the Aquistore CO 2 sequestration site in Estevan, Saskatchewan, Canada

Geological Storage of CO2. Evaluating the Risk of Leakag! Injection & Leakage

Setting ARD Management Criteria For Mine Wastes with Low Sulfide and Negligible Carbonate Content Stephen J. Day and Chris B. Kennedy SRK Consulting

Assessing risk to fresh water resources from long term CO 2 injection- laboratory and field studies

Groundwater Quality Changes in Response to CO 2 Leakage from Deep

CO 2 Well Integrity and Wellbore Monitoring

Geological sequestration. or storage of CO 2

Summary of Field Test Site and Operations

What to do with CO 2 : The Knowns and Unknowns of Geologic Sequestration and CO 2 EOR in Greenhouse Gas Context

This presentation is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy National Energy Technology Laboratory under DE FC26 05NT42590 and was

SECARB Phase II Cranfield, MS

Geochemistry and Inverse Modeling of the Memphis Aquifer in Tennessee, USA. Darin Wilwand Geology 428 Geochemistry Fall 2014

METALS TREATMENT AND IN SITU PRECIPITATION. Mike Hay September 30, 2016

Low Pressure Bottom Hole Sample Collection For Complex Water Characterization

secarbon.org Southeast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB) Phase III Early CO2 Injection Field Test at Cranfield

SQUEEZING THE BAKKEN: SUCCESSFUL SQUEEZE PROGRAMS LEAD TO SHIFT CHANGE IN BAKKEN SCALE CONTROL

CO 2 -Brine Relative Permeability Characteristics of Low Permeable Sandstones in Svalbard

CarbFix. Rapid CO 2 mineral sequestration in basalts. Edda SP Aradóttir. NAS/NRC Workshop on Geologic Capture and Storage of CO 2

Feng Pan 1,2, Brian McPherson 1,2, Peter Lichtner 3, John Kaszuba 4, Caroline Lo Ré 4, Satish Karra 3, Chuan Lu 5, TianFu Xu 6

New Acid Stimulation Treatment to Sustain Production Los Angeles Downtown Oil Field U.S. Department of Energy Grant No.

Permanence and detection of physical seepage addressing CDM - Meth panel monitoring concerns

Beaker 1 Beaker 2 Beaker 3 Beaker 4

Fundamentals of modelling CO2 movement underground

Fundamentals of Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)

Hydrogeology of a shallow coalbed methane play: A case study of Ardley coal in west- central, Alberta

Storage options 1. Geological storage. CO2 capture and storage Storage options

A Study of Groundwater Quality from Domestic Wells in the Sussex and Elgin Regions, New Brunswick

Groundwater Monitoring Under a UIC Class VI Permit for a Carbon Storage Project

IEA-GHG Summer School Svalbard Aug 2010

Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Deep Geological Formations for Inventory Verification and Carbon Credits

Principles of CO 2 geological storage

Safe and successful CO 2 injection operation and post-injection monitoring closing the life cycle of the Ketzin pilot site

Groundwater and Surface Water Overview of the Lochend Area, Alberta

Outline of Presentation

SPE Comparison of Chemical and Hysteresis CO 2 Trapping in the Nugget Formation 2. S. H. Behzadi, SPE, University of Wyoming

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Interpretation of Chemistry Data from Seepage, Observation Well, and Reservoir Water Samples collected at Horsetooth Dam during July 2004

Too much carbon in our atmosphere? Carbon sequestration One option

Reservoir simulation for a CO 2 sequestration project

Woodburn, James Russell Bojes, Heidi Pope, Peter G. Railroad Commission of Texas Austin, TX

CO 2 Geological storage - TOTAL Approach. SCA 2003 Symposium 14/12/2003

Application of Numerical Models to Development of the Frio Brine Storage Experiment

Hydrogeochemical Evaluation of the Texas Gulf Coast Aquifer System and Implications for Developing Groundwater Availability Models

PIT LAKES LIABILITY OR LEGACY? David Allen (MBS Environmental) Karen Ganza (MBS Environmental) Rob Garnham (Groundwater Resource Management)

Lee Shafer Basin Engineering October 26, 2017

Coal Bed Methane (black coal, green future.)

William Wilmot Matrix Solutions Inc. 118, Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Lecture 5. Exchange Reactions. Cation exchange Salt/Sodium Affected Soils Acid Soils

Florida Aquifer Geology

Role of Enhanced Oil Recovery in Carbon Sequestration The Weyburn Monitoring Project, a case study

Oil Sands Water Disposal Challenges

SECARB Annual Stakeholders Meeting. March 7, 2012 John Litynski, PE Carbon Storage Technology Manager

Florida Aquifer Geology

NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS OF INTERACTIONS BETWEEN SUPERCRITICAL CO 2 AND HIGH-TEMPERATURE FRACTURED ROCKS IN ENHANCED GEOTHERMAL SYSTMES

Ribeirão Preto. Brasil

Characterization of Deep Groundwater: A Conference Report. William M. Alley, Michael Wireman, Mary Musick 2014 GWPC Annual Forum

Class V Experimental Well Permit Process Items & Potential Issues for Western Kentucky CO 2 Storage Project

Florida Aquifer Geology

Brackish Ground Water Desalination: Challenges to Inland Desalination Technologies (It sure ain t seawater desalination)

Southwest Regional Partnership on Carbon Sequestration

Florida Aquifer Geology

ISL Mining in Kazakhstan and Technology Development Vienna, IAEA, April 2013

Water Management in Queensland Coal Seam Gas. John Walsh, PhD CETCO Energy Services

Aquistore. Saskatchewan s Deep Saline CO 2 Storage Research Project. April 19, Presented by Kyle Worth, P.Eng., PMP to INRS, Quebec City

Is CCS (Geological Storage) Ready for Prime Time?

GEOCHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION OF SALINE WATER FROM AN IRRIGATION WELL IN NORTH-CENTRAL STAFFORD COUNTY, KANSAS

Saline Water - Considerations for Future Water Supply. Bruce Thomson Water Resources Program UNM

THERMOGRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS OF BARNETT SHALE SAMPLES

Geochemical Modeling of CO2 Sequestration in Dolomitic Limestone Aquifers

6. Organic Compounds: Hydrocarbons. General Comments Borden, Canada, tracer test Laurens, SC, gasoline spill Bemidji, MN, crude oil spill

6 th Well Bore Integrity Network Meeting

CO 2 Storage in Geological Media

2 SECARB Anthropogenic Test SP030414

Minnelusa Core Analysis and Evaluation Project

Progress of the Heletz pilot injection project

Monitoring of CO 2 intrusion in shallow aquifers

BORATES. 59. Ulexite - NaCaB 5 O 6 (OH) 6 5H 2 O. Color - Crystal Habit - Crystal System - Cleavage - Hardness - Luster/Streak / Use (if any) - Other

Safety and Monitoring of CO 2 Storage Projects

CO2 Storage Experience in Japan including Impacts of Earthquakes. Ziqiu Xue Research Institute of Innovative Tech.

Biological Reductive Dechlorination of Chlorinated Compounds. Barry Molnaa WSW Remediation Practice Manager ARCADIS

Accelerating The Dissolution of CO 2 in Aquifers

Lessons Learned During In Situ Chemical Oxidation - Failure & Success?

ObjecAve 1/15/2014. IntroducAon. Developing a groundwater quality monitoring program for shale gas plays. IntroducAon.

CO 2 Geological Storage: Research, Development and Deployment (RD&D) Issues

Enhanced in Situ Leaching (EISLEACH) Mining by Means of Supercritical Carbon Dioxide - TOUGHREACT Modeling

Groundwater Chemical Evolution by: David Banks, Hydrogeologist and thermogeologist

Moving from Secondary to Tertiary Recovery Stages. 9 TH ANNUAL WYOMING EORCO2 CONFERENCE JULY 14-16, 2015 Casper, WY By Jim Mack MTech Ventures LLC

Geological CO 2 storage works with appropriate site characterization and monitoring

Well Stimulation and Sand Production Management (PGE 489 ) Sandstone Acidizing. By Dr. Mohammed A. Khamis

Supercritical CO 2 leakage Modeling for Well Integrity in Geological Storage Project

CO 2 (g) + H 2 O = H 2 CO 3 log K H = HCO 3 log K 1 = HCO - 3 = H CO 3 log K 2 = -9.0

Transcription:

Gas-Water-Rock Interactions in Saline Aquifers Following CO 2 Injection: Results from Frio Formation, Texas, USA GCCC Digital Publication Series #05-03e Y. K. Kharaka D. R. Cole W. D. Gunter J. J. Thordsen E. Kakouros Keywords: Grass-Water-Rock Interactions, Saline Aquifers, Open Hole Logs, Mineral-Water- Gas Interactions, Field Sampling Cited as: Kharaka, Y.K., Cole, D.R., Gunter, W.D., Thordsen, J.J., and Kakouros, E., Gaswater-rock interactions in saline aquifers following CO2 injection: results from Frio Formation, Texas, USA: presented at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, California, December 5 9, 2005, paper GC12A-08. GCCC Digital Publication Series #05-03e, pp. 1-16.

Gas-Water-Rock Interactions in Saline Aquifers Following CO 2 Injection: Results from Frio Formation, Texas, USA * Kharaka, Y K (ykharaka@usgs.gov), U. S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd. Mail Stop 417, Menlo Park, CA 94025 United States Cole, D R (coledr@ornl.gov), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 United States Gunter, W D (gunter@arc.ab.ca), Alberta Research Council, 250 Karl Clark Rd., Edmonton, AB T6N 1E4 Canada Thordsen, J J (jthordsn@usgs.gov), U. S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd. Mail Stop 417, Menlo Park, CA 94025 United States Kakouros, E (kakouros@usgs.gov), U. S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Rd. Mail Stop 417, Menlo Park, CA 94025 United States To investigate the potential for the geologic storage of CO 2 in saline sedimentary aquifers, ~16 million kg of CO 2 were injected at ~1,500-m depth into a 24-m sandstone section of the Frio Formation a regional brine and oil reservoir in the U. S. Gulf Coast. Fluid samples obtained from the injection and observation wells before, during and post CO 2 injection, show a Na-Ca-Cl type brine with 93,000 mg/l TDS and near saturation of CH 4 at reservoir conditions. As injected CO 2 became the dominant gas at the observation well, results showed sharp drops in ph (6.5 to 5.7), pronounced increases in alkalinity (100 to 3,000 mg/l as HCO 3 ) and Fe (30 to 1,100 mg/l), and significant shifts in the isotopic compositions of H 2 O, DIC and CH 4. Geochemical modeling indicates that brine ph would have dropped lower, but for the buffering by dissolution of carbonate and iron oxyhydroxides. The low ph values resulting from CO 2 injection could cause rapid dissolution of carbonate and other minerals creating pathways for CO 2 and brine leakage. Dissolution of some minerals, especially iron oxyhydroxides could mobilize trace metals and other toxic components. Also, where residual oil and other organics are present, the injected CO 2 may mobilize organic compounds, some may be environmentally toxic. The δ 18 O values for brine and CO 2 samples indicate that supercritical CO 2 comprises ~45% of fluid volume in Frio sandstone near injection well ~6 months after end of injection. Post-injection sampling, coupled with geochemical modeling, indicate the brine gradually returning to its pre-injection composition.

Gas-Water-Rock Interactions in Saline Aquifers Following CO 2 Injection: Results From the Frio Formation, Texas Yousif Kharaka a, David Cole b, William Gunter c, James Thordsen a, Evangelos Kakouros a, a U. S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California, USA b Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA c Alberta Research Council, Edmonton, Canada Financial support from DOE-NETL (Karen Cohen, program manager) AGU, December 5, 2005

Topics Discussed Energy, CO 2 levels and global warming Composition of water and gases in the Frio Baseline, during and post injection results. How are such data obtained and why are they important to CO 2 sequestration? Water-mineral-CO 2 interactions in the Frio. Environmental implications of post injection results. Future plans and concluding remarks.

Frio Brine Pilot Injection interval Injection interval: 24-m-thick, mineralogically complex Oligocene reworked fluvial sandstone, porosity 34%, Permeability 2-3 Darcys Seals numerous thick shales, small fault block Depth 1,500 m Brine-rock system, no hydrocarbons 67 C; 150 bar Hovorka et al., 2004 Oil production

Open Hole logs Top A ss Injection well Observation well Top B ss Top C ss Proposed injection zone Hovorka et al., 2004

Frio CO 2 Field sampling Drilling & test water tagged with dye tracers Date Site Sampling info Sample series June 3, 2004 injection well MDT tool 04FCO 2-100 Jul 23-Aug 2, 2004 injection well, monitoring well surface sampling (N 2 ), Kuster, submers.pump 04FCO 2-200 & gw wells Oct 4-7, 2004 monitoring well U-tube 04FCO 2-300 Oct 29-Nov 3, 2004 monitoring well U-tube 04FCO 2-400 April 4-6, 2005 injection well surface sampling (N 2 ) 05FCO 2-100 & monitoring well & Kuster

Salinity and normalized conc. of major cations and anions 04FCO2-218 (observation; pre-injection) Na 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 HCO 3 Br-Cl, indicator of solute origin (* Frio value) Kharaka & Hanor, 2004 Ca SO 4 Mg Cl ph = 6.7; TDS = 93,800 mg/l 04FCO2-337 (observation; post-injection) 100 75 50 25 0 25 50 75 100 Na HCO 3 Ca SO 4 Mg Cl ph = 6.03; TDS = 92,600 mg/l

Selected chemical data from monitoring well during CO2 injection 6.9 ph HCO3 3500 ph 6.7 6.5 6.3 6.1 5.9 5.7 EC 3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 Alkalinity HCO 3 (mg/l); EC (x10 ms/cm) 5.5 4-Oct-04 5-Oct-04 6-Oct-04 7-Oct-04 8-Oct-04 0

3400 Frio: Ca, Fe & Mn Ca (mg/l) 3200 3000 2800 Fe (mg/l) 1200 1000 800 600 400 Fe injection C Fe observation C Fe observation B Mn injection C Mn observation C Mn observation B 2600 10/5 10/6 10/7 10/8 20 16 12 8 Mn (mg/l) 200 4 0 6/04 8/04 10/5/04 10/6/04 10/7/04 04 12/04 2/05 4/05 0

Computed ph and saturated states of selected minerals at T & P ph 7 6 5 4 3 2 ph values at: surface T & P eq. calcite ph -12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 pco 2 (bars) calcite albite, low dolomite goethite siderite 4 2 0-2 -4-6 -8-10 G (kcal/mole)

Important Mineral-Water-Gas Interactions in Frio CO 2 (gas) + H 2 O H 2 CO o 3 ------ (1) H 2 CO 3o HCO 3- + H + ------ (2) CO 2 (gas) + H 2 O + CaCO 3 Ca ++ + 2HCO - 3 ------ (3) H + + CaCO 3 Ca ++ + HCO - 3 ------ (4) H + + FeCO 3 Fe ++ + HCO - 3 ------ (5) 4Fe ++ + O 2 + 10H 2 O 4Fe(OH) 3 + 8H + ------ (6) 2H + + CaMg(CO 3 ) 2 Ca ++ + Mg ++ + 2HCO - 3 ------ (7) 4.8H + + Ca.2 Na.8 Al 1.2 Si 2.8 O 8 + 3.2H 2 O.2Ca ++ +.8Na + + 1.2Al +++ + 2.8H 4 SiO 4 ------ (8) 0.4H + + Ca.2 Na.8 Al 1.2 Si 2.8 O 8 + 0.8CO 2 + 1.2H 2 O.2Ca++ +.8NaAlCO 3 (OH) 2 + 0.4Al(OH) 3 +2.8SiO 2 --- (9)

Organics in Oil-Field Water Frio DOC (6/04-4/05) DOC (m g /L ) 1000 100 10 1 DOC injection w ell DOC observation w ell C-sand DOC observation w ell B-sand ACETATE & OTHER ACID ANIONS BTEX PAHs PHENOL 4 METHYL PHENOL BENZOIC ACID 4 METHYL BENZOIC ACID 2 HYROXY BENZOIC ACID (mg/l) 10,000 60 10 20 2 5 4 0.2 0 Jun-04 Aug-04 Oct-04 Dec-04 Feb-05 Apr-05 3 HYDROXY BENZOIC ACID 1.2 Kharaka & Hanor, 2004

Chemical Composition of Frio Gases Frio formation water at saturation with CH 4

Brine/CO2 volume ratio at reservoir conditions 18 O shift 18 O shift Brine/CO 2 Date* Brine CO 2 vol. ratio 10-5-04 0 0 10-6-04 0.37 32 59 10-6-04 0.69 32 32 10-6-04 0.77 32 29 10-6-04 1.22 32 18 10-7-04 2.24 32 10 11-3-04 1.43 32 15 11-3-04 1.74 32 12 4-4-05 11.2 22 1.4 5-4-05 11.7 22 1.3 6-4-05 11.9 22 1.3 δ 18 O f CO2 - δ 18 O i CO2 X brine /X CO2 = δ 18 O i H2O - δ 18 O f H2O Isotopic mass balance equation, where the superscripts i and f are the initial and final δ values for brine and CO2, respectively, and X is the atomic oxygen in the subscipted omponent.

Summary and Conclusions 1- The Frio brine is saturated with CH 4 has a salinity of ~93,000 mg/l TDS, and is a Na-Ca-Cl type water. 2- Alkalinity and ph determinations are excellent and rapid field methods for tracking injected CO 2. 3- The low ph values resulting from CO 2 injection could have important environmental implications: a)-dissolution of minerals, esp. iron oxyhdroxides could mobilize toxic components; b) dissolution of minerals may create pathways for CO 2 and brine leakage. 4- Where residual oil and other organics are present, CO 2 may mobilize organic compounds; some may be toxic.