IR-4 MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 1

Similar documents
Potential for Phytotoxicity of Endorse 11.3 DF (Polyoxin D) On Gaura (Gaura lindheimeri Siskiyou Pink )

FIELD DATA BOOK REVISIONS FOR TRIAL YEAR

IR-4 NATIONAL PESTICIDE CLEARANCE PROTOCOL AMENDMENT# 1. Page 1 PR. NO.: 3897 DATE: PROJECT TITLE::

THE EFFECT OF FOLIAR FERTILIZERS ON HERBICIDE EFFICACY AND OAT YIELD I

Cucumber No-Till Weed Management Study.

4/11/2010 (C4 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 5 University of Georgia. Palmer amaranth seed return as impacted by weed management program.

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pennant Magnum 7.62 EC (S-Metolachlor) On English Lavender (Lavandula angustifolia Vera )

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pendulum 2G (Pendimethalin) On Lady s Mantle (Alchemilla mollis Auslese )

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pennant Magnum 7.62 EC (S-Metolachlor) On Purple Rock Cress (Aubrieta Whitewell Gem )

Conducted Under GEP (Y/N): Y Guideline Description: To Protocol

No significant differences in corn stand between treatments were determined. No PRE applied treatment caused corn injury when observed on May 29,

Guidance on requirements for efficacy data for zonal evaluation of a plant protection product in the Northern Zone

June, 2011 Guidance on requirements for efficacy data for zonal evaluation of a plant protection product in the Northern Zone

RESULTS OF AGRONOMIC AND WEED SCIENCE RESEARCH CONDUCTED IN SOUTH CENTRAL MONTANA

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Snapshot 2.5TG (Trifluralin + Isoxaben) On Hen and Chicks (Sempervivum tectorum Sunset )

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Snapshot 2.5TG (Trifluralin + Isoxaben) On Common Sneezeweed (Helenium autumnale)

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Dual Magnum. EPA Reg EPA SLN No. NJ

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions in Date 5/4 5/24 6/2 6/17 Treatment Temperature (F) Relative Humidity (%)

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pendulum 2G (Pendimethalin) On Purple Rock Cress (Aubrieta Whitewell Gem )

1/17/2010 (Veg27 09) Spray/Seeding Plan Page 1 of 6 University of Georgia Weed and pepper response to a potentially new fumigant.

Oregon State University Columbia Basin Ag Research Center Rattail fescue control in chemical fallow

(TA-05-03) Site Description Page 1 North Carolina State University. Osprey tank mix study -- broadleaf control. Phone No:

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2010 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, UNIV. GUELPH, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

where as pyroxasulfone at lbai/a and Dual at 1.2 lbai/a failed to provide acceptable control (63% and 33% respectively)

There were no apparent differences in corn stand. No corn injury was observed on May 25. However, on June 5, 3 to 10% injury was observed with EPOST

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Lily-of-the-Nile (Agapanthus Peter Pan )

Vernon Center Technical Report # prepared by. Brian Olson John Sij Todd Baughman

Effect of Linex Application Rate and Timing on Sweetpotato Katie Jennings NC State University

Background. AEM Tier 2 Worksheet Pesticide Use. Glossary. AEM Principle:

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. Reflex Herbicide For Control of Weeds in Transplanted Tomatoes and Transplanted Peppers

Adjuvant Studies in Soybean

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Variegated Japanese Sedge (Carex morrowii Old Gold )

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Snapshot 2.5TG (Trifluralin + Isoxaben) On Purple Rock Cress (Aubrieta Whitewell Gem )

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2009 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, RIDGETOWN COLLEGE FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

PREEMERGENCE AND POSTEMERGENCE HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN FIELD CORN

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pennant Magnum 7.62 EC (s-metalochlor) on Fairy Primrose (Primula malacoides)

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pennant Magnum 7.62 EC (s-metalochlor) on Candytuft (Iberis sempervirens Snowflake )

2016 Demonstration of the herbicide components in dicamba soybean, PRE plus POST and POST only applied at 3 and 6 inch weed at Rochester, MN.

OPVC FINAL PROJECT REPORT: 2016 PROJECT YEAR: 1 of 1. Project Title: Tolerance of Carrots to Bicyclopyrone and Tolpyralate, 2016

2014 Giant Ragweed Control with Diflexx Herbicide in Field Corn in Rochester, MN.

Influence of rainfall amount, rainfall timing, organic matter, and soil ph on sulfentrazone dry pea injury and yield (2004)

Title: Nutsedge control in sweet corn and other rotational crops

FOR DISTRIBUTION AND USE ONLY WITHIN THE STATE OF MISSOURI. Reflex Herbicide For Weed Control in Watermelon. EPA Reg. No

Evaluation of Command Tank Mixes for Broadleaf Weed Control in Pumpkins, R. Allen Straw and M. Angela Harrison. Interpretative Summary

WEED CONTROL IN TOMATOES RESEARCH RESULTS 2011 PREPARED BY DARREN ROBINSON, UNIV. GUELPH, RIDGETOWN CAMPUS FOR THE ONTARIO TOMATO RESEARCH INSTITUTE

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pennant Magnum 7.62 EC (s-metalochlor) on Transvaal Daisy (Gerbera jamesonii Lambada )

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Fountain Grass (Pennisetum setaceum Cupreum )

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Roundup Efficacy Using Drift Reduction Nozzles

Southern Illinois University. General Trial Information. Trial Location. Personnel

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Trial Report

2/10/2016. *Junebearer *Everbearer *Day-neutral. *Matted Row *Narrow Row *Ribbon Row *Raised Bed *Plasticulture *High tunnel vertical stacks?

Louisiana State University Department of Agronomy and Environmental Management. Envoke Weed Control/Crop Tolerance Test

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pendulum 2G (Pendimethalin) on Heart-leaved Bergenia (Bergenia cordifolia Rotblum )

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pendulum 2G (Pendimethalin) on Fairy Primrose (Primula malacoides)

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Pennant Magnum 7.62 EC (s-metalochlor) on Heart-leaved Bergenia (Bergenia cordifolia Rotblum )

SUPPLEMENTAL LABELING. This supplemental label expires on July 31, 2015 and must not be used or distributed after that date.

Field Reference Guide

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATO. Joel Felix Malheur Experiment Station Oregon State University Ontario, OR, 2009.

Specticle G for Landscape Ornamental Bed Use Compared to Snapshot and FreeHand

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Weed Control in Vine Crops: Consider All Your Options. Mark VanGessel, Barb Scott, and Quintin Johnson

OPVC Project Number: Project title: Improving the Utility of Upbeet (Triflsulfuron) Herbicide in Table Beets

Cucurbit crop tolerance to fomesafen, 2009 Oregon State University, Horticulture Dept. Submitted by Ed Peachey

Weed Management Studies in Sunflower

What is Organic? HORT325: Organic Crop Production. Characteristics of Organic Farms. Certified Organic Vegetable Production. Scientific definitions:

SUPPLEMENTAL LABELING

(01-ASC-10) Common ragweed leaf no. - numerous height (inch) - 2-4

Influence of Fungicides on Black Dot Suppression and Russet Norkotah Yield

Comparison of "Full Load" Glyphosate Formulations in Roundup Ready Soybean - Waterhemp.

PART 5 PAGE Trial Year 2018 Total number of pages in this section at initial pagination:

DEVELOPMENT OF HERBICIDE OPTIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN POTATOES

R. Allen Straw, SW VA AREC, VPI Farm Rd., Glade Spring, VA 24340,

EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES IN CARAWAY IN HARVEST YEAR, Loimaa

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

EPA SLN. registration

OECD GUIDELINES FOR THE TESTING OF CHEMICALS

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Corn

2018 Engenia Herbicide Stewardship Training

CONCLUSIONS

Innovative Youth Corn Challenge. Orientation, 2014

Response of Snapbean, Carrot, and Sweet Corn to Monopotassium Phosphate-Based Starter Solutions George J. Hochmuth 1

Potential for Phytotoxicity of Mogeton 25 WP (Quinoclamine) on Shasta Daisy (Leucanthemum X superbum)

Report MICOSAT F. Efficacy and Selectivity evaluation of Micosat F) (Crude inoculum + Bacteria and Saprophytic fungi)

LSU AgCenter Department of Agronomy. Valor and Velpar K4 Application Timing and Cane Tolerance Test

Effects of Row Spacing on the Yield of Soybeans [Glycine max] Student name. Mentor Name

EFFICACY OF COMMANDER 240EC (OXYFLUORFEN) IN WEED CONTROL

Weed Control with Outlook Combinations Combinations of Outlook with herbicides currently registered for use in potatoes were evaluated for

Table 1. Application timing, plant stages, environmental conditions Date 5/5 5/25 6/1 6/12 Treatment POST II (C) PRE (A) POST I (B)

Innovative Youth Corn Challenge. Orientation, 2015

Annex. Nutrient Deficiency

Kansas State University Field Pansy Control In No-Till Fields Going To Soybeans

Distance from inlet end (ft)

Nikolaos Koukiasas and Alistair Murdoch University of Reading

Evaluation of the "Fit" of Amber and Rave in Tall Fescue Pastures

Title: Stand establishment of winter canola in the low- to intermediate-rainfall zones of the Pacific Northwest

Bob Pearce, David Ditsch, Jack Zeleznik, and Wade Turner

DOES GLYPHOSATE PLUS STAPLE OR ENVOKE APPLIED TOPICALLY TO ROUNDUP READY COTTON IMPACT FRUIT SET OR SEED YIELD?

C. Dean Yonts, Irrigation Engineer John A. Smith, Machinery Systems Engineer Robert G. Wilson, Weed Scientist

Transcription:

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page Project Title (pesticide/commodity): Investigator (name, address, phone): Address of Experimental Plots: Target Pest(s), or Use: Experimental Pesticide: Manufacturer: EPA Reg. No.: CAS No.: Batch/Lot No.: Chemical Standard: Manufacturer: EPA Reg. No.: CAS No.: Batch/Lot No.: Planting Date: Transplanting Date: Emergence Date: Plot Size and Experimental Design: Row Spacing: Plant Spacing: Soil Type: ph: % Organic Matter: Maintenance Chemicals/Pesticides Applied Product Date Rates Growth Stage Reason Cultural Practices (fertilization, cultivation, rotation crops, etc.):

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page APPLICATION DATA Treatment Application Rate Application Volume of Spray Date TRT# (eg. x Spinosad) (lb.ai/a) Type Mixture

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page Application # Date: Crop Growth Stage: SPRAY RECORD TABLE (use additional sheets, if necessary) Soil Moisture: Air Temp.: Soil Temp.: Relative Humidity: Wind Speed/Direction: Cloud Cover %: st Rainfall After Trt.: Comments: Crop Stress: Application # Date: Crop Growth Stage: Soil Moisture: Air Temp.: Soil Temp.: Relative Humidity: Wind Speed/Direction: Cloud Cover %: st Rainfall After Trt.: Crop Stress: Comments: Application # Date: Crop Growth Stage: Soil Moisture: Air Temp.: Soil Temp.: Relative Humidity: Wind Speed/Direction: Cloud Cover %: st Rainfall After Trt.: Crop Stress: Comments:

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page IR- RAINFALL/IRRIGATION RECORDS/TABLE Submit a copy of the test site=s daily rainfall and irrigation records, or Assign each colum (A-F) a month. For each day with rain or days when irrigation was applied, note the amount (in cm or inches) and circle either R for rainfall or I for irrigation. Please record rainfall amounts for two weeks before beginning of study and continue for duration of trial. On bottom of page specify type of irrigation (e.g. overhead, trickle, furrow). Day A. B. C. D. E. F. R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 5 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 6 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 7 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 8 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 9 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 0 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 5 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 6 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 7 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 8 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 9 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 0 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 5 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 6 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 7 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 8 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 9 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I 0 R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I R/I Total

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 5 IR- PERFORMANCE TABLE - EFFICACY - TABULAR DATA Pest: Pest: Pest: Pest: Treatment Rate (lb.ai/a) Rep. Date: Date: Date: Date: Control* NA Control NA Control NA Control NA Control NA NOTE: Define measurement of pest population and efficacy scale (e.g. 0-00: with 0=no control and 00=complete control). *In herbicide trials report for both weedy check and weed-free check.

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 6 IR- PERFORMANCE TABLE - PHYTOTOXICITY - TABULAR DATA Phyto rate # Phyto rate # Phyto rate # Phyto rate # Treatment Rate (lb.ai/a) Rep. Date: Date: Date: Date: Control NA Control NA Control NA Control NA Control NA NOTE: Define measurement of phytotoxicity, or index of injury

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 7 IR- PERFORMANCE TABLE - YIELD/QUALITY - TABULAR DATA Harvest # Harvest # Harvest # Date: Date: Date: Treatment Rate (lb.ai/a) Rep. Units: Units: Units: Crop Quality Rating Control NA Control NA Control NA Control NA Control NA

IR- MINOR USE PERFORMANCE FORM PR NO. Date of Report Field I.D. No. Page 8 Narrative summary of results and additional notes (include drawing of plot design) Rev. 0/09