CANSO Global Approach to Safety. Sam Espig NATS

Similar documents
Aviation System Risk Profiles

Machine Learning; forecasting safety risk and performance

Remarks of CANSO Director General, Jeff Poole, to the CANSO Global ATM Safety Conference in Bangkok on 26 January 2015

Operational Goals WP/12

Operations: Safety. Eric De Causemacker, NSA BE 11 April 2011

Training Data Tools to Enhance Safety Intelligence

OJT INSTRUCTOR. Learning outcomes. Why study this course? Aim. ICAO Code 212

Goals and Standards The ICAO Perspective

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: B IFATCA 14 WP No. 84

Federal Aviation Administration The NextGen Vision of Future Safety

Remarks of CANSO Director General Jeff Poole to the CANSO Global ATM Safety Conference in Punta Cana, 19 October 2015

ATC BASIC. Learning outcomes. Why study this course? Aim. ICAO Code 051

The Aerospace Performance Factor (APF)

Understanding Aviation Risk

NCLB AIM Workshop Cairo,11-13 September 2017 SWIM. IATA s Perspective

Project Overview: SMALL AIR TRANSPORT ROADMAP

Global Aviation Safety Roadmap Focus Area 7: Inconsistent use of Safety Management Systems (SMS)

OPERATIONS. Environment Workgroup (ENVWG) Performance-based Navigation Workgroup (PBNWG) Aeronautical Information Management Workgroup (AIMWG)

Thomas Michael Lintner, Steven D. Smith, Scott Smurthwaite / Paper for the 2009 ISAHP

ATFM: GETTING STARTED

The goal of the Flight Operations Risk Assessment System (FORAS)

Module 1 Fundamentals of Data-Driven Decision Making

Big data for improving aerospace safety

CANSO Safety Successful Story

Recent developments in ICAO

civil air navigation services organisation CANSO WORKGROUPS

FDA Seminar Miami October FDA Within SMS. Capt Paul DUBOIS Manager SMS & FDA Assistance AIRBUS

SESAR Overview. WAKENET3 Europe Workshop. Paul Adamson SJU Programme Manager (WP6/12)

Cooperative Development of Operational Safety & Continuing Airworthiness Programme. 18th STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING Discussion Paper 4

55 th CONFERENCE OF DIRECTORS GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION ASIA AND PACIFIC REGIONS

AERONAUTICAL COMMUNICATION PANEL (ACP)

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR ENERGY AND TRANSPORT MANDATE TO CEN/CENELEC/ETSI FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF

Safety Performance Measurement -

European Aviation Safety Agency. Report. European Aviation Safety Plan Final list of Safety Actions 08/02/2013

Environment Strategy

AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION SERVICES-AERONAUTICAL INFORMATION MANAGEMENT STUDY GROUP (AIS-AIMSG)

Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Safety Case Guidance Material

Delri Muller, Karen B. Marais, Payuna Uday (Purdue) R. John Hansman, Tom G. Reynolds, Jonathan Lovegren (MIT)

NAS-Wide Performance: Impact of Select Uncertainty Factors and Implications for Experimental Design

ORGANISER HOST LEAD SPONSOR

DIRECTORS GENERAL OF CIVIL AVIATION CONFERENCE ON A GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR AVIATION SAFETY

Safety Management System: Occurrence Reporting and Classification

Safety Management System Maturity

Commission hearing on the preparation for RP3

Paved Areas: Standards and Maintenance Program

European Plan For Aviation Safety: A Regional Safety Strategy

SULAYMANIYAH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MATS CHAPTER 13. April 2012

Airport Collaborative Decision Making Enhancing Airport Efficiency

Strategic Approach to Safety. Issued June 2011

Big Data and Analytics Creating Actionable Intelligence

Changes in Aviation Organisations:

Aerodrome Safety Awareness

Topics and Trends in Incident Reports: Using Structural Topic Modeling to Explore Aviation Safety Reporting System Data

Safety Risks in an Airworthiness Organisation

6.4 ACCEPTABLE LEVEL OF SAFETY (ALoS) (SMM Chapter 6.4, 2nd edition 2009)

International Civil Aviation Organization FIRST INFORMATION MANAGEMENT PANEL (IMP/1) Montreal, Canada January, 25 30, 2015

European Aviation Safety Agency. Report. European Aviation Safety Plan Final list of Safety Actions 09/03/2012

istars UserGroup Meeting 1 dec. 2018

aerial services EUROCONTROL CNS SYMPOSIUM 02 OCTOBER 2018 FUTURE CNS: A DRONE AIRSPACE USER VIEW Gilles Fartek Co-owner & Co-funder INAS 1 Sept-2017

Report. of the. EASA SKPI RP3 S(K)PI Working Group

SESAR & NextGen Working together for Aviation Interoperability

A tool for Operational Safety

Interaction between SSP and SMS. Chiang Hai Eng Director Asia Pacific Affairs CANSO

Civil-military ATM performance based partnership

Transforming Risk Management

INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS ASSOCIATIONS. Agenda Item: 9.4 IFATCA 09 WP No.105

FAA Office of. Environment and Energy Operations Research Projects. Federal Aviation Administration

European Aviation Safety Agency. Report. European Aviation Safety Plan Final list of Safety Actions 24/02/2014

The Role Of Stakeholders In Implementation Of Air Safety Projects In Kenya: A Case Study Of Jomo Kenyatta International Airport, Nairobi

Risk Observatory design and early prototype

Fachpanel Environment & Human Factors Impuls Talk: Human Factors in Air Traffic Management

IOsA sms strategy I s s u e d A p r I l

PERSONNEL REQUIREMENT AND COMPETENCE

SSP Implementation Process CANADA

Metrics Workshop 21 June 2017

International Civil Aviation Organization. Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A CDM) Saulo Da Silva

Support of Traffic Management Coordinators in an Airport Air Traffic Control Tower Using the Surface Management System

Drones Policy Paper. Version 1.0 July ACI Drones Policy Paper. Approved on June 17 th 2018 by ACI WGB at its 57 th meeting

AIM Training Guidance Material Joachim Bruja : CANSO AIM WG

Jacques Boursiquot Director of Air Navigation HAITI

Stevens Institute of Technology & Systems Engineering Research Center (SERC)

Joining CANSO: ATM Suppliers and Stakeholders Associate Membership

The elements of SMS. The components of SMS. The elements of SMS. ICAO SMS framework

GROUP ON INTERNATIONAL AVIATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE (GIACC)

SMS Promotion and Assessment. Dave Chapel Flight Safety and Reliability Director GE Aviation October 25, 2013

CASE STUDY. American Airlines Adopts Mobile Solutions and Increases Labor Productivity. CORENA Pinpoint Mobile for Aviation MRO

ARMD Strategic Thrust 6: Assured Autonomy for Aviation Transformation Roadmap, Part 3: Candidate Mission Products and Community Feedback

JOB DESCRIPTION & PERSON SPECIFICATION

Assessing your Key Risk Indicators

INTERMEDIATE REPORT ON THE DRAFT REGULATORY APPROACH FOR

BowTie in Aviation SMS The Message to Management. Bob Dodd Senior Director Risk Management The Aloft Group

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Update

SESAR European ATM Master Plan & SESAR2020

Performance Based Approach for ASBUs Implementation

EPISODE 3. Episode 3 paves the way for SESAR validation

RESEARCH OVERVIEW. ACRP 09-02: Best Practices for Activities in or near Airport Movement Areas

TWELFTH AIR NAVIGATION CONFERENCE

Amendment Proposal to Doc 9868 PANS - Training. Informal Briefing to the ANC 16 May 2014

Runway Friction and Aircraft Braking: the way forward

Promoting a safety culture in maintenance

Transcription:

CANSO Global Approach to Safety Performance Measurement Sam Espig NATS

Agenda Measures and targets CANSO Safety Strategy ICAO Aviation Safety Index Slide 2

Why set targets? Provide common direction Motivate people Allow direct comparison

The Issues

The Issues

The Issues

Measures and Targets

Measures and Targets

Measures and Targets

Measures and Targets

Targets and measures Measures are good But, be very careful when setting targets t Avoid setting too few targets (difficult to game since cannot draw relationship between the targets) Regulators and service providers need to ensure that targets drive the right behaviour When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure. Prof. Marilyn Strathern.

Proposed CANSO Vision In 2025, safety is: As a result there will have been no increase in the rate of risk bearing ATM incidents despite increases in traffic density and complexity

Understanding what makes everyday Lots of incidents operations safer mance High variation in performance? Fewer incidents Negative Outcome Occurs Move performance away from the Less variation in red line? performance? If we operate far from the red line and Reducing? we re less likely to cross it. Perfor Reduce performance variation? If our performance varies less we re less likely to cross the red line. The Past The Present The Future How to stop performance Can t Lots Fewer use of incidents data to to count inform us on how to achieve crossing this the red line? Need We Maybe measures can we re of assume operating our performance we operate further based near away on how the from we deliver red line or the since red How a safe line? So, we have probably reduced our risk (of crossing we do service, the keep we day-in, manage day-out, red line) crossing our it risk to inform us of Therefore, we operate with a higher risk (of of crossing an incident? We know our performance our performance variation, and still varies but we still can t the quantify red line) if the variation i We is large know our distance or our how performance from it is the changing. incident varies, probably a lot, but we can t quantify it We don t know if our performance could vary in a way that crosses the line. Counting incidents tells us very little about the risk of crossing the red line. Time

Understanding what makes everyday operations safer TODAY we monitor safety: -LOSs - Runway incursions TOMORROW we will: - Develop real time safety metrics to monitor everyday safety performance - Provide GMs with real time safety dashboards In the future ATM will become complex Unwanted events will become less and less frequent Safety will no longer be understood from one off unwanted events Slide 14

Understanding what makes everyday operations safer Slide 15

Understanding what makes everyday operations safer We will understand the link between everyday performance and safety Slide 16

Controlling how safe we are We will set safety targets to control safety at the sector and individual level We will dynamically control risks in real time We will know what action to take to normalise our operations to a consistent level of risk We will understand the trade-off between capacity and safety We will know which h safety improvements best align with our future needs Slide 17

ICAO Aviation Safety Index Vision It will provide an easy-to-read measurement of the overall health of the aviation system in a given State It will also allows for the ability to drill-downdown into each domain of the States aviation system, and then further into each identified indicator, as may be required to identify and address specific problems in a State, region or across groups of fstates. t

ICAO Aviation Safety Index Vision The ASI will provide a multi-dimensional assessment of safety risk through the use of indicators related to various domains within a State s aviation system. Application of the ASI will lead to a measurable improvement in global aviation safety and reduce the risk of loss of life through better utilisation of limited resources and dtargeted t assistance strategies. t

ASI Conceptual Framework Government e e t / Carriers / Regulator Airlines Aerodromes Air Navigation Service Providers 20

Safety Intelligence inputs Certification Exposure Occurrences USOAP IOSA CANSO SMS Effectiveness Departures Leasing Activity Over-flights Fleet Growth Loss of separation Runway incursion Runway excursion Airspace infringers Technology Ops Environment Fleet Age CNS Infrastructure PBN Implementation Aircraft Equipage Airspace complexity Terrain Weather Remote area ops 21

Safety Dashboard Prototype Certification Technology Op Env ment Occurrences Exposure 22

ASI The Current Position The Aviation Safety Intelligence initiative is still very much in its development stage CANSO SSC is playing a significant part helping shape the initiative It will generate more data input for CANSO and hence improved benchmarking It will drive continuing improvement in data quality and consistency it 23

Conclusions Working at global level Setting targets is difficult Trying to change the way we think and talk about safety Moving towards much more predictive indicators of safety Understanding safety at much more granular level l in real time Driving safety benefit into the system design