CORE ANALYSIS REPORT Conventional Core. Vecta Oil & Gas, Ltd.

Similar documents
Chapter 2 Porosity (2.15)

Porosity and permeability for the Berea sandstone exhibiting large interfacial tensions Lab 3 and lab 4 by Group 38

Steady-State Permeability Analysis in Unconventional Plays

An experimental study of permeability determination in the lab

Core Analysis of the Round Tank Queen Reservoir, Chaves County, New Mexico. By: Garrett Wilson

A PROTOCOL TO EVALUATE CAPROCK INTEGRITY FOR THERMAL HEAVY OIL AND BITUMEN RECOVERY OPERATIONS

For contact information, please visit our website:

TEST PLAN. Constant Head Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Measurements on Repacked Core Samples

NOTE: BIDDERS MUST BID ON ALL ITEMS IN ORDER TO BE RESPONSIVE. ITEM QTY DESCRIPTION UNIT OF UNIT PRICE TOTAL GAMMA LOG PER FOOT $

Influence of Clay Content on Surfactant- Polymer Flooding For an Egyptian Oil Field. Prof. Atef Abdelhady, British University in Egypt

Characterization and Modeling to Examine the Potential for CO 2 Storage and Enhanced Oil Recovery in the Bakken Petroleum System

Drilling Technologies

TITLE 252. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY CHAPTER 652. UNDERGROUND INJECTION CONTROL

AN OVERVIEW OF THE LOW AND HIGH TEMPERATURE WATER-OIL RELATIVE PERMEABILITY FOR OIL SANDS FROM DIFFERENT FORMATIONS IN WESTERN CANADA

Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) for the Extraction and Instrument Analysis of Siloxanes from Cartridges

POROSITY AND PERMEABILITY IN TIGHT ROCK

TETIARY CARBON DIOXIDE FLOODING OF LOW PERMEABLE CHALK WITH IN-SITU SATURATION DETERMINATION USING X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY

UNCONVENTIONAL TIGHT OIL RESERVOIRS: A CALL FOR NEW STANDARDIZED CORE ANALYSIS WORKFLOWS AND RESEARCH

Chapter Two Reservoir Properties Porosity

METHOD 5A - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM THE ASPHALT PROCESSING AND ASPHALT ROOFING INDUSTRY

Orono Spectral Solutions, Inc.

Fundamentals Of Petroleum Engineering ROCK AND FLUID PROPERTIES

Minnelusa Core Analysis and Evaluation Project

CORE LABORATORIES.1NC. Petroleum Reservoir Engineering DALLAS. TEXAS. March 21, 1958

Reservoir Simulation & Forecasting Course Outline

METHOD 17 - DETERMINATION OF PARTICULATE MATTER EMISSIONS FROM STATIONARY SOURCES. NOTE: This method does not include all of the

SUITABILITY FOR IN-SITU RECOVERY (ISR) CONFIRMED

TVN-01 TABLE OF CONTENT. Standard Disclaimer

POROSITY LOGGING CORE COPYRIGHT. Density Log. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Orono Spectral Solutions, Inc.

Chemical Flood Design

D.9 Particulate Nitrogen and Particulate Carbon

Gas measurement method and weighing method to measure the core porosity research and comparative analysis

- Golden, Colorado [303] FAX: [303]

Accurate Viscosity Measurement under Extreme Pressure & Temperature. Gulf Coast Conference October 17, 2012 William A. Small

GAMMA RAY AND SPONTANEOUS POTENTIAL LOGGING CORE COPYRIGHT. Introduction. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

EDICT ± OF GOVERNMENT

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY OIL, GAS, AND MINERALS DIVISION OIL AND GAS OPERATIONS. Filed with the Secretary of State on

Prediction of Water Production in CBM wells

Quick and Simple Porosity Measurement at the Well Site Abstract Introduction

Effect of methanol-treated fracturing fluids on multiphase permeability in tight sandstones

12 Reservoir technolgy August Classification: Internal

PORE STRUCTURE OF VUGGY CARBONATES AND RATE DEPENDENT DISPLACEMENT IN CARBONATE ROCKS

BELL CREEK TEST SITE BASELINE MVA INITIATED

Recommended Practice for Field Testing Oil-based Drilling Fluids

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY GANDHINAGAR Department of Civil Engineering Soil Mechanics Laboratory

This is Reservoir Engineering COPYRIGHT. By the end of this lesson, you will be able to:

Global Climate & Energy Project

Case Study of Polymer Flooding a Heavy Oil in the Tambaredjo Field, Suriname 2008 till now

Recent Advances in the Analytical Methods Used for Shale Gas Reservoir Gas-in-Place Assessment*

LAP-010. Procedure Title: Author: Tina Ehrman Date: 4/22/94. SUPERSEDES: n/a ISSUE DATE: 4/22/94. Ethanol Project

3. FIELD INVESTIGATION PROGRAM

CEEN Laboratory 1 Mechanical Sieve Analysis Specific Gravity of Soil Solids Gravimetric/Volumetric Relations

A New Approach to Simultaneously Enhancing Heavy Oil Recovery and Hindering Asphaltene Precipitation

Petrophysical Data Acquisition Basics. Mud Logging A Combination of Direct and Indirect Measurements

SUB-SLAB DEPRESSURIZATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION

WELL RECORD INSTRUCTIONS (Unconventional Operators only)

Effect of Network Topology on Relative Permeability; Network Model and Experimental Approaches

Improvement of Fracturing for Gas Shales

EXTRACTORS. To Order, Call Specialty Glass, Inc. Toll Free

COPYRIGHT PETROSKILLS LLC

SPECIFICATION CONTROL DRAWING

How to Obtain Primary Drainage Capillary Pressure Curves Using NMR T2 Distributions in a Heterogeneous Carbonate Reservoir

Reservoir Surveillance Fundamentals Lab Work. Compliments of Intertek Westport Houston Laboratory

Viscosity Standards for High-Pressure, High- Temperature, and High- Viscosity Conditions. Kurt Schmidt Houston, Texas, USA January 22, 2010

Aquifer Airlift Testing

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 57

Analysis Fraction Flow of Water versus Cumulative Oil Recoveries Using Buckley Leverett Method

HYSTERESIS EFFECTS IN CAPILLARY PRESSURE, RELATIVE PERMEABILITY AND RESISTIVITY INDEX OF NORTH SEA CHALK

INCH-POUND. MIL-PRF-27404C 01 October 97 SUPERSEDING MIL-P-27404B 22 May 1979 PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATION PROPELLANT, MONOMETHYLHYDRAZINE

SOIL MECHANICS I ( SEMESTER - 5 )

A Comparison Study between the Newly Developed Vertical Wells Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage and the Conventional SAGD Process

EXAMINER S REPORT AND PROPOSAL FOR DECISION STATEMENT OF THE CASE

ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PLANNING FOR THE LUCKEY DITCH FIELD

METHOD 4 - DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT IN STACK GASES. NOTE: This method does not include all the

New Methods and Technologies in Petroleum Geology, Drilling and reservoir Engineering. June Krynica, Poland

Simultaneous Extraction of PAHs and PCBs from Tissue and Soil Samples Using a New Accelerated Solvent Extraction (ASE) Procedure

2 SECARB Anthropogenic Test SP030414

Soil Water Relationship. Dr. M. R. Kabir

Fundamentals of Well Logging and Petrophysics for Non-Technical Professionals

Torchlight Energy Operating

Latest Developments at the EERC and CO 2 Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) in Bakken Shale

Determination of Diesel Range Organics (DROs) Using SPE and GC/FID by Method 8015D*

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH DEPARTMENT OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING ChE LEACHING

Detailed Performance Report, Phase 2 Refrigeration System Conversion to R-434A (RS-45) For

EXPERIMENT 3 SOLIDS DETERMINATION

Th CO2 09 Huff-n-Puff Test For Minimum Miscibility Pressure Determination For Heavy Oil

Sand Control. Gravel packing is the oldest and simplest method of sand control. Works in both on and off shore wells.

OFI Testing Equipment Retort Analysis Instructions Part #s ,14,80 Page 1 of 4 RETORT ANALYSIS

Case Study A Comparison of Well Efficiency and Aquifer Test Results Louvered Screen vs. Continuous Wire-Wrapped Screen Big Pine, California

The Impact Of The Values of Cementation Factor and Saturation Exponent In The Calculation Of Water Saturation For MacaB Formation, Campos Basin.

Topical Report. By Susan S. Sorini John F. Schabron Joseph F. Rovani, Jr. September 2003

GEL Hydrogeology (Groundwater) LAB 2: POROSITY & HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY - Porosity Segment - Grade: /25

Coiled Tubing for Downhole Applications

Automated Mercury/Non-mercury Intrusion Porosimeter AMP-60K-A-1

Chapter 1: Introduction

THERMOFIT RT-218 TUBING Modified Polyvinylidene Fluoride, Low Outgassing, Heat-Shrinkable

Tennessee Underground Injection Control Program Overview

Monitoring Plan for a Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) Pilot Test in Orinoco Oil Belt, Venezuela

NEW MINIMUM MISCIBILITY PRESSURE (MMP) CORRELATION FOR HYDROCARBON MISCIBLE INJECTIONS

Transcription:

CORE ANALYSIS REPORT Conventional Core FINAL REPORT Performed for: 575 Union Blvd., Suite 208 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Report issued: February 9, 2010 Performed by: Weatherford Laboratories 16161 Table Mountain Parkway Golden, Colorado 80403 File: DN-45813 The interpretations or opinions expressed represent the best judgment of Weatherford-OMNI Laboratories, Inc. and assumes no responsibility and makes no warranty or representations, as to the productivity, proper operation, or profitableness of any oil, gas or any other mineral well. These analyses, opinions or interpretations are based on observations and materials supplied by the client for whom this report is made.

February 9, 2010 Herb Mosca 575 Union Blvd., Suite 208 Lakewood, Colorado 80228 Subject: Conventional Core Final Core Analysis Report File: DN-45813 Mr. Mosca: A core study using core material from the subject well has been completed for The procedures were modified during the course of the study through e-mail and telephone conversations between Weatherford Laboratories and Vecta Oil & Gas, Ltd personnel. Final results of the core study are presented herein. Preliminary data were provided to Vecta Oil & Gas, Ltd and posted to the Weatherford Laboratories secure data hosting website, as available throughout the course of the study. The routine core analysis data and graphical results are presented in tabular and graphic formats in Section 1 of this report. Wellsite Weatherford Laboratories personnel were present at the wellsite for recovery of the conventional core as it reached surface. A total of twenty-five (25) feet of conventional core from one (1) coring runs was recovered and delivered to Weatherford Laboratories in Golden, Colorado on December 26, 2009. Core Handling and Sampling Core Inventory & Gamma Upon arrival at the Weatherford Laboratories facility, all recovered core material was inventoried and logged for total gamma. A final inventory of received core is included in Appendix A of this report. Core gamma data were processed and plotted in depth versus total gamma (API units), at a vertical scale of 5 inches to 100 feet. Core Sampling Sixteen (16) core plug samples were drilled from Core 1 for Fast Track routine core analysis (RCA). The RCA core plug samples were acquired in a horizontal orientation from the requested intervals at a frequency of one sample per foot. The RCA samples were cut 1.5-inches in diameter, using humidified nitrogen as a bit lubricant. Each horizontal RCA sample was then trimmed to 2.0-inches in length to come from the center of the core, weighed, and wrapped in Saran and aluminum foil. Each RCA sample was immediately taken to the extraction lab to begin the Fast Track RCA. Routine Core Analysis Extraction/Leaching The core plug samples for Fast Track routine core analysis was weighed to 0.001 grams. Then each core plug sample was placed in a pre-dried, pre-weighed, and pre-labeled glass extraction thimble. The core plug and thimble samples were weighed together for accuracy just prior to loading into the extraction unit. The core plug

sample was not removed from the glass thimble until after the drying process described below. All associated glassware used for the extraction and leaching process was cleaned, rinsed with solvents, and dried before use. Selected samples were submitted to the Dean Stark extraction process, where gas phase toluene is used to extract hydrocarbons and in-situ water from individual core samples. Each condenser, core chamber and flask used for the Dean-Stark extraction process was rinsed with fresh reagent grade toluene before pre-boiling. The toluene in each Dean Stark extraction unit was pre-boiled for a minimum of one hour to ensure there was no free water in the system prior to loading the core plug samples. A control unit was established for each set of core plug samples where a pre-weighed amount of distilled water was added to the toluene and monitored for full recovery during the pre-boiling step. This is performed to ensure the batch of toluene was not contaminated with chemicals that would make the extracted water miscible with the Toluene solvent. Each graduated sidearm receiving tube was checked for water and dried prior to loading the core plug samples. After the samples were loaded into its individual Dean Stark extraction unit, the condenser was capped with desiccant to prevent the introduction of condensed atmospheric water into the system. Water volume in each graduated sidearm receiving tube was monitored during the toluene extraction until a stable volume was observed over a 24-hour period due to the requested Fast Track analysis. The condenser was rinsed with reagent grade toluene and a wire was used to detach any water droplets from the neck of the condenser. Each sample was removed from its Dean-Stark extraction unit and allowed to vent overnight. Final water volumes were measured volumetrically to (± 0.05 cc), removed from the graduated sidearm tube by a syringe, and weighed gravimetrically to (± 0.001 grams). Each sample was placed in a batch reflux soxhlet under a chloroform-methanol azeotrope to further extract any residual hydrocarbons and leach inorganic salt. After the azeotrope effluent was clear and did not precipitate silver nitrate, the samples were removed, and checked for fluorescence under UV light using a cutting solvent. All core plug samples that did not produce an oil cut were submitted for drying. Due to the requested Fast Track analysis the samples were in batch cleaning for a 24-hour period. Sample Drying Each core plug and thimble sample was dried in a vacuum oven at 180 degrees Fahrenheit. Samples were removed from the oven and cooled to room temperature over desiccant in a sealed container. Sample weights were monitored daily until weight stabilization (± 0.05 grams) was achieved over a 24-hour period. Due to the requested Fast Track analysis after a 24-hour period each core plug sample was removed from its glass thimble. The core plug sample was weighed and its associated glass thimble was weighed to ensure accuracy. Grain Volume and Grain Density Determination A grain volume of each core plug sample was measured by helium injection using the Boyle's Law method. The equipment was calibrated with known volume steel billets to establish a pressure vs. volume linear relationship. Berea, titanium and steel standards were measured before each run to ensure the system was properly calibrated. The core plug samples were kept in a desiccator until ready for grain volume measurement and individually weighed just prior to its grain volume measurement. The Berea check plug was measured after every fifth sample, and the measurement of every fifth core plug sample was repeated to ensure continued calibration of the system. Grain densities (gm/cc) were calculated from the dry sample weight (gm) and grain volume data (cc) using the formula: GD = DW GV Where: GD = Grain Density, gm/cc DW = Dry weight, gm GV = Grain Volume, cc

Plug Permeability to Air and Porosity Measurements Boyle s law helium pore volumes and steady state nitrogen permeability values were measured at the designated net confining stress (NCS) of 800 psi. Each core plug sample was loaded into a Hydrostatic core holder system and pressure was applied to achieve a simulated reservoir stress. Using the techniques established by Frank Jones, pore volume was measured and calculated using the following equation: At NCS: ø = (PV) / (GV+PV) * 100 Where: ø = Porosity, percent PV = Pore Volume, cc GV = Helium Grain Volume, cc Permeability to air was measured by establishing a constant differential pressure and constant flow rate of nitrogen gas across each core plug sample. Permeability values are calculated based on Darcy s Law. ( Length * Volume * Vis cosity) Kair = 14700* (Pr essure * Area * Time) Where: K air = Permeability to Air, millidarcys 14700 = constant for unit conversions Length = length of test sample, cm Volume = volume of nitrogen measured, cm 3 Viscosity = nitrogen s viscosity at test temperature, cp Pressure = pressure drop across test sample, psi Area = area of test sample, cm 2 Time = time of measurement, seconds Klinkenberg permeability values are provided for each sample and were calculated from the observed steadystate data using the following equation: KK ( G + AA* G = G Ma+ 1 PMa 1+ AA* G Ka) Ma PMa Where: KK = Klinkenberg Permeability G = Ka If Ka > 0.437, then AA = 0.777 and Ma = -0.39 If Ka < 0.437, then AA = 0.86 and Ma = -0.33 PMa = Mean Pressure

Sample Disposition After the core sampling program nine (9) boxes of core material were delivered, via Weatherford Laboratories personnel to Triple O Slabbing on December 28, 2009. The release forms and inventories are included in Appendix B. Weatherford Laboratories appreciates the opportunity to have been of service to If you have any questions, or if we may be of any further assistance, please contact any Weatherford Laboratories representatives at (720) 898-8200. Sincerely, David B. Sutton General Manager Western US Core Analysis

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1: ROUTINE CORE ANALYSIS Total Gamma Core Data Permeability/Saturation and Porosity Cross Plots APPENDIX A: CORE INVENTORIES Received Inventory Sample List / Drill Sheet APPENDIX B: SAMPLE SHIPMENTS Release Forms Inventories

SECTION 1 ROUTINE CORE ANALYSIS RESULTS Total Gamma Core Data Permeability/Saturation and Porosity Cross Plots

CORE GAMMA, PERMEABILITY, AND POROSITY PROFILE PLOT VERTICAL SCALE 5 inch:100 feet Morrow Sand Date: 12/29/2009 Core: 1 (5302.0' - 5327.05') Total Gamma 0 50 100 150 200 5250 100 10 Permeability to Air, md 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 20 16 Porosity, percent 12 8 4 0 Kair - Permeability NCS - Porosity 5260 5270 5280 5290 5300 5310 5320 5330 5340 5350 5360 5370 5380 5390 5400 5410

SUMMARY OF FAST TRACK CORE ANALYSES RESULTS Vacuum Oven Dried at 180 F Net Confining Stress: 800 psi Marrow Sandstone Date: 12/29/2009 Fluid Sample Permeability, Porosity, Grain Saturations, Core Sample Depth, millidarcys percent Density, percent Number Number feet to Air Klinkenberg Ambient NCS gm/cc Water Oil Total 1 1-10 5311.45 0.021 0.011 9.8 9.8 2.69 65.6 29.5 95.2 1 1-11 5312.20 0.015 0.007 9.1 9.0 2.69 62.0 37.6 99.6 1 1-12 5313.20 0.011 0.005 9.5 9.5 2.68 47.8 51.5 99.3 1 1-13 5314.20 0.189 0.115 10.1 10.0 2.66 59.8 29.3 89.1 1 1-14 5315.20 0.328 0.213 11.7 11.6 2.67 75.3 3.9 79.2 1 1-15 5316.40 0.307 0.189 12.0 11.9 2.66 68.4 10.0 78.5 1 1-16 5317.65 0.085 0.045 9.9 9.8 2.88 64.5 25.8 90.2 1 1-17 5318.20 0.272 0.173 11.2 11.1 2.65 66.1 11.7 77.7 1 1-18 5319.20 0.856 0.680 16.1 16.0 2.66 69.8 6.9 76.7 1 1-19 5320.20 5.43 4.36 14.9 14.8 2.65 47.4 20.4 67.8 1 1-20 5321.35 27.1 22.7 12.5 12.5 2.64 42.7 3.0 45.7 1 1-21 5322.20 3.41 2.70 14.5 14.4 2.65 59.3 12.4 71.8 1 1-22 5323.20 3.43 2.74 13.8 13.8 2.65 67.9 4.6 72.5 1 1-23 5324.90 1.42 1.12 9.8 9.8 2.69 56.6 3.8 60.4 1 1-24 5325.75 0.198 0.143 9.6 9.6 2.65 61.4 8.1 69.4 1 1-25 5326.50 0.229 0.169 10.6 10.5 2.68 67.3 1.2 68.6 Average values: 2.70 2.21 11.6 11.5 2.68 61.4 16.2 77.6

PERMEABILITY AND FLUID SATURATIONS VERSUS POROSITY Vacuum Oven Dried at 180 F Net Confining Stress: 800 psi Marrow Sandstone Date: 12/29/2009 100 100 y = 0.0001e 0.7136x Water Oil Permeability to Air, millidarcys 10 1 0.1 0.01 Fluid Saturations at NCS, percent pore space 80 60 40 20 0.001 0 4 8 12 16 20 Porosity at NCS, percent 0 0 4 8 12 16 20 Porosity at NCS, percent

APPENDIX A CORE INVENTORIES Received Inventory Sample List / Drill Sheet

WELLSITE - TUBE LIST Date: 12/26/2009 Core 1 Top Bottom Recovered Tube (Box) Depth, Depth, Core, Number feet feet feet Comments 1 5302.00 5305.00 3.00 mud 2 5305.00 5308.00 3.00 mud 3 5308.00 5311.00 3.00 mud 4 5311.00 5314.00 3.00 5 5314.00 5317.00 3.00 6 5317.00 5320.00 3.00 7 5320.00 5323.00 3.00 8 5323.00 5325.55 2.55 9 5325.55 5327.05 1.50 shoe Total footage recovered: 25.05

DRILL SHEET CORE 1 Date: 12/26/2009 RCA - for Dean Stark extraction Routine Plugs RCA Plug Diameter: 1.5 - inch Requested Actual Plug Length: 2.0 - inches Sample Sample Drilling Fluid: Humidified Nitrogen (3% KCl) Plug Core Sample Depth, Depth, Comments: Orient End Trim Driller Date Weight, No. No. feet feet By Notching W/Trim Saw "Up-Hole" Direction Name Drilled grams 1 1-10 5311.45 5311.45 J. Bean 12/26/2009 54.80 1 1-11 5312.20 5312.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 54.13 1 1-12 5313.20 5313.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 55.38 1 1-13 5314.20 5314.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 57.64 1 1-14 5315.20 5315.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 56.99 1 1-15 5316.40 5316.40 2 attempts - short plug J. Bean 12/26/2009 41.71 1 1-16 5317.65 5317.65 J. Bean 12/26/2009 58.89 1 1-17 5318.20 5318.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 53.19 1 1-18 5319.20 5319.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 54.67 1 1-19 5320.20 5320.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 53.39 1 1-20 5321.35 5321.35 short plug J. Bean 12/26/2009 39.88 1 1-21 5322.20 5322.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 49.59 1 1-22 5323.20 5323.20 J. Bean 12/26/2009 56.04 1 1-23 5324.90 5324.90 J. Bean 12/26/2009 53.75 1 1-24 5325.75 5325.75 J. Bean 12/26/2009 58.48 1 1-25 5326.50 5326.50 J. Bean 12/26/2009 55.72 (16) Total RCA Samples

APPENDIX B SAMPLE SHIPMENTS Release Forms Inventories

(720) 898-8200 Fax: (720) 898-8222 16161 Table Mountain Parkway, Golden, Colordao 80403 Release Form Upon Receipt, please sign release form and fax back to (720) 898-8222 Date: 12/28/2009 WFT Labs Employee Authorizing Release: Suzy Nickerson Means Of Delivery: WFT Labs personnel OMNI File Number: DN-45813 Well Information: Material Released: (25.05) Feet of whole core Individual Requesting Release: Herb Mosca (Vecta) Individual Authorizing Release: Matt Goolsby (Vecta) Purpose Of Release: Per Client Request Address Material Was Delivered To: Triple "O" Slabbing Phone: (303) 778-7173 Attention: Butch Oliver 2830 W. 9th Ave Denver, Colorado 80204 Delivery Accepted By: Date: Printed Name:

INVENTORY Date: 12/28/2009 Core 1 Top Bottom Recovered Tube (Box) Depth, Depth, Core, Number feet feet feet Comments 1 5302.00 5305.00 3.00 mud 2 5305.00 5308.00 3.00 mud 3 5308.00 5311.00 3.00 mud 4 5311.00 5314.00 3.00 5 5314.00 5317.00 3.00 6 5317.00 5320.00 3.00 7 5320.00 5323.00 3.00 8 5323.00 5325.55 2.55 9 5325.55 5327.05 1.50 shoe Total footage recovered: 25.05

(720) 898-8200 Fax: (720) 898-8222 16161 Table Mountain Parkway, Golden, Colordao 80403 Release Form Upon Receipt, please sign release form and fax back to (720) 898-8222 Date: 1/6/2010 WFT Labs Employee Authorizing Release: Suzy Nickerson Means Of Delivery: WFT Labs personnel OMNI File Number: DN-45813 Well Information: Material Released: (16) Endtrims Individual Requesting Release: Herb Mosca (Vecta) Individual Authorizing Release: Matt Goolsby (Vecta) Purpose Of Release: Per Client Request Address Material Was Delivered To: Phone: (214) 686-0091 Attention Herb Mosca 2830 W. 9th Street Denver, Colorado 80204 Delivery Accepted By: Date: Printed Name:

INVENTORY Date: 1/6/2010 Sample Depth, Number Feet 1-10 5311.45 1-11 5312.20 1-12 5313.20 1-13 5314.20 1-14 5315.20 1-15 5316.40 1-16 5317.65 1-17 5318.20 1-18 5319.20 1-19 5320.20 1-20 5321.35 1-21 5322.20 1-22 5323.20 1-23 5324.90 1-24 5325.75 1-25 5326.50