"Methane emissions from the disposal of mechanicallybiologically

Similar documents
Methane emission from passively degased landfills and landfills with mechanicallybiologically pre-treated municipal solid waste.

Draft Quantification Protocol for Landfill Gas Capture and Combustion Carbon Competitiveness Incentive Regulation

LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM IRRIGATED MAIZE: THE LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS

Quantification Protocol for Aerobic Composting

Methodological tool Emissions from solid waste disposal sites

Better Waste Management Reduces Greenhouse Gas Emissions

THE SHARE OF METHANE AND NITROUS OXIDE EMISSIONS OF THE TOTAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION INVENTORY UNCERTAINTY

Quantification Protocol for Landfill Gas Capture and Combustion Carbon Competitiveness Incentive Regulation

The EEA waste model Past, Present & Future

Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute Centre for Research and Technology Hellas

JCM_VN_F_PM_ver01.0. A. Title of the methodology. Methane recovery from organic waste through controlled anaerobic digestion and its use for energy

Greenhouse Gas Emission and Economic Evaluation from Municipal Solid Waste Landfill in Thailand

SNAP CODE: & & & & & & &

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF ORGANIC WASTE WE MAKE THE WORLD A CLEANER PLACE

Estimating the Overall Impact of A Change In Agricultural Practices on Atmospheric CO 2

BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT OF SOLID WASTE

NFR: 5.A Biological treatment of waste - Solid waste disposal on land SNAP: ISIC: Version Guidebook 2013

UNFCCC/CCNUCC. CDM Executive Board III.H./Version 4 Scope 13, 15 Page 1 EB 28

Philippines GHG Emissions : Waste Sector. Teresita R. Perez, Ph.D. Ateneo de Manila University

Technology Fact Sheet Mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) i

Waste management options and climate change - the case of biowaste

Methodological tool. Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site.

Methodological tool. Tool to determine methane emissions avoided from disposal of waste at a solid waste disposal site.

UNFCCC/CCNUCC. CDM Executive Board III.H./Version 05.1 Sectoral Scope: 13 EB 32

QUANTIFICATION OF AREA FUGITIVE EMISSIONS AT OIL SANDS MINES

UNFCCC/CCNUCC. CDM Executive Board III.H./Version 4 Scope 13, 15 Page 1 EB 28

Waste Management Comments on Draft Organic Waste Composting Project Protocol Version 1.0 (May 2010) June 7, 2010

5. BIOLOGICAL PROCESS MONITORING IN HOME COMPOST BINS

2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Waste Sector

AEROBIC IN SITU STABILISATION OF LANDFILLS IN THE CLOSURE AND AFTERCARE PERIOD

"INOGATE Technical Secretariat & Integrated Programme in support of the Baku Initiative and the Eastern Partnership energy objectives" Project

L 24/18 Official Journal of the European Union

Quantification Protocol for Biogas Production and Combustion

CRADLE-TO-GATE LIFE CYCLE INVENTORY ANALYSIS FOR BIO-MATE COMPOSTING SYSTEM

Introduction. Development of Application Procedure of the Tier 2 Methodology for CH 4 Emission from Korean Landfills HALLYM UNIVERSITY

17. Solid Waste Management/Landfill (Methane Recovery)

A case study of landfill gas potential at Kikås landfill

Box 8-1: Methodological Approach for Estimating and Reporting U.S. Emissions and Sinks

Landfill ban for organic / biodegradable waste. Landfill acceptance criteria for MBT - material

OVERVIEW OF THE IPCC GUIDELINES

BIOCOVER REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM LANDFILLS BY USE OF ENGINEERED BIO-COVERS

Chapter 9: Other Land CHAPTER 9 OTHER LAND IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 9.1

Introduction to the Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring Tool (ECAM-Tool)

Livestock Project Verification Protocol. Capturing and combusting methane from manure management systems

Municipal waste management in Slovenia

Poland s Third National Communication under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2001

Guidelines for Quantifying GHG emission. reductions of goods or services through Global. Value Chain

Methane Oxidation in Optimised Landfill Cover Layers under Different Seasonal Conditions

Disposal sites and Isotopes

Chapter 3: Solid Waste Disposal CHAPTER 3 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 3.1

Biosolids and Greenhouse Gas Accounting. Sally Brown, Andrew Carpenter, Ned Beecher, AndrewTrlica and Kate Kurtz

Emission reductions from Waste Treatment and Disposal in Germany

Landfill Bioreactor Protocol May 2008 SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION. Withdrawn. MAY 2008 Version 1. Page 1

Landfill Bioreactor Protocol May 2008 SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION. MAY 2008 Version 1. Page 1

Dr. Sukumar Devotta Director National Environmental Engineering Research Institute, Nagpur

Conditions for placing the packaging on the market

A comparison between waste-to-energy and mechanical biological treatment (MBT)

environmentaleconomic accounting Direct and indirect CO2 emissions in Germany, Federal Statistical Office of Germany

Greenhouse Gas Balances for Biomass: Issues for further discussion

Compost and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM)

Global Warming Potentials in AR4. V. Ramaswamy. NOAA/ Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton University

A Look at Fugitive GHG Emissions Reporting and the Effects on Regulated Facilities

NFR: 2.B.7 Soda ash production SNAP: Soda ash production and use ISIC: Version Guidebook 2013

Long Term Treatment and Disposal of Landfill Leachate. Debra R. Reinhart Nicole Berge Eyad Batarseh University of Central Florida

DRAFT IMPLEMENTING DECREE. of 2016

Estimation of Emissions from CO 2 Capture and Storage: the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories

Fast Facts. U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions

METHANE BIOFILTRATION: A COST-EFFECTIVE APPROACH TO ELIMINATE FUGITIVE METHANE EMISSIONS

INABENSA. Guidelines for Suppliers for the Determination of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Products Supplied to Inabensa.

1 Introduction to Life Cycle Assessment

CAPCOA Air Toxic Hot Spots Program

Annex to the generally binding regulation of the Olomouc region. /. Waste management plan of the Olomouc region

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON TOXICITY, ECOTOXICITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (CSTEE)

UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SYSTEM SOLID WASTE RESEARCH PROGRAM Student Project Report

GHERL. GreenHouse Effect Reduction from Landfill

Is Your Landfill Generating Carbon Credits, or Just Hot Air? A Verifier s s Perspective

CH 4 EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL

Fast Facts. U.S. Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Environmental risk assessment of biocides applied in the offshore oil exploration industry

2013 Revised Supplementary Methods and Good Practice Guidance Arising from the Kyoto Protocol G.1

Carbon storage in engineered wood products in landfills

International Nitrogen Initiative 2016 conference (INI2016). Quantification of the German nitrogen cycle

Composting Principals

On Pollution. The Saeima 1 has adopted and the President has proclaimed the following Law: Chapter I General Provisions

WASTE-C-CONTROL - Waste management options for greenhouse gases emissions control LIFE09 ENV/GR/000294

Indicative simplified baseline and monitoring methodologies for selected small-scale CDM project activity categories

Measuring & Quantifying CH 4 from MSW Landfills

Landfill Gas Monte Carlo Model Documentation and Results

22. Sewerage and Urban Sanitation / Landfill Disposal of Waste

VII NEW CDM TOOLS FOR WASTE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS

Nonwoven fabrics [EDP (0)]

Waste Management and Recycling:

Data Sources and Methods for the National Greenhouse Gas Emissions Indicators. May 2013

SNAP CODE: SOURCE ACTIVITY TITLE : Plaster Furnaces NOSE CODE: ISIC: 2394

Bertelsmann Carbon Footprint and Environmental Indicators

Estimation of Carbon dioxide and Methane Emissions Generated from industrial (WWT) plants

DISPOSAL SITE GAS MODELING STUDY. Shadra Disposal Site Agra, India

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory

Greatmoor Energy from Waste Facility. Carbon Footprint Assessment

5th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management Athens June 2017

Transcription:

Umweltbundesamt Referat Z 6 Dessau-Roßlau "Methane emissions from the disposal of mechanicallybiologically treated waste" Project Z 6 30533/3 FKZ 360 16 036 Abbreviated version of the final report Prof. R. Stegmann und Partner Schellerdamm 19-21 21079 Hamburg Germany 27 April 2012

1 Abbreviated version of the final report 1 Task The task and aim of the expert opinion is to develop the technical basics for the calculation of the methane emissions from the disposal of MBT waste for the emission report. For the implementation, research results and practical experiences of recent years were primarily evaluated, and in particular also the monitoring measures regarding the gas balance at the MBT disposal sites. 2 Situation of the mechanical-biological waste treatment in Germany At the outset, the legal framework of mechanical-biological waste treatment and the demands on the disposal of mechanically-biologically treated waste were prepared. For 2009, the Statistische Bundesamt (Federal Statistical Office) provides the following information: Number of mechanical-biological waste treatment plants: 51 Total treatment capacity: 4.676 million Mg Amount of waste treated: 3.958 million Mg Output: 3.253 million Mg Thereof deposited: approx. 1 million Mg Treatment residues from MBT plants are deposited at approximately 40 disposal sites. 3 Methane formation potential of mechanically-biologically treated waste The evaluations of former and current investigations and the monitoring results from MBT disposal sites lead to the following findings:

2 In the medium and long term, gas compositions occur at most of the MBT disposal sites, which correspond to those of the stable methane phase and the long-term phase. The evaluation indicates, with sufficiently pretreated waste (AT 4 5 mgo 2 /gts, GB 21 20 Nl/kgTS), that a total gas formation potential in the range between 30 and 40 Nm 3 /MgTS is to be expected. At an average methane content of 60 vol.-%, this corresponds to a methane formation potential between 18 and 24 Nm 3 CH 4 /MgTS. 4 Half-life or reaction constants for the methane formation from deposited MBT waste The rate and chronological sequence of the gas formation are influenced, amongst others, by the emplacement water content and the temperature in the landfill body, the share of aerobic degradation processes, and the methane oxidation processes at the deposition surface or in the soil cover. The findings point out that, at the time of landfilling, a certain remaining share of readily and medium-degradable organic compounds is still present in the MBT waste and is even well available. When landfilled, the MBT waste boasts rather favourable boundary conditions for the start or continuation of biodegradation processes. Therefore, the following ranges of values are suggested for the emission assessment regarding the shares of biological availability and half-lives (H) of the MBT waste partial flow to be deposited: o readily available/degradable organic subst.: approx. 60% with H = 3 ± 2 years o medium available/degrad. organic subst.: approx. 20% with H = 10 ± 5 years o poorly available/degradable organic subst.: approx. 20% with H = 25 ± 10 years These half-lives lie in comparable ranges as the IPCC default values. The approach with differentiated half-lives ("three-phase model") and the deduced residual gas formation potentials thus reflect the first monitoring results from MBT disposal sites that show that, during the first years of disposal, the anaerobic degradation processes proceed relatively intensively (Figure 1).

gas production [m 3 /h] gas production [m 3 /h] "Methane emissions from the disposal of mechanically-biologically treated waste" 3 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 H differentiated H 15 years average 0 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 80 70 60 50 40 30 H differentiated total H 3 years readily degradable H 10 years medium degradable H 25 years poorly degradable 2,40 2,10 1,80 1,50 1,20 0,90 methane flux [l/m 2 *h] 20 0,60 10 0,30 0 0,00 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Fig. 1: At the top: gas forecast calculation for the one-phase model (half-life = 15 years) and the three-phase model (half-life H differentiated); at the bottom: share of readily, medium and poorly degradable organic substances in the gas production in the three-phase model 5 Biological methane oxidation during the disposal of MBT waste The microbial oxidation of methane as a passive gas treatment measure was specified by the IPCC as a key technology for the treatment of landfill-induced methane emissions. For quantification, the methane oxidation factor OX was established.

4 On the one hand, high methane oxidation capacities of many soils and substrates were proven in laboratory tests and partially in field studies. On the other hand, however, measurements at MBT disposal sites and old disposal sites show that the major part of the landfill gas also leaves the landfill body via preferred gas emanation zones in MBT landfills that are not covered. From FID inspections at several MBT disposal sites, it can be inferred that approximately 63% to 95% of the total methane emission volume is released via only 10% of the sampled measuring points. This corresponds to a share that is higher than average. For most of these sampled gas emanation points (hot spots), it can be assumed that no noteworthy methane oxidation takes place. Further limiting factors for methane oxidation are spatial and temporal load peaks, strongly varying moisture contents, soil temperatures that tend to be too low for optimum metabolic processes of the methanotrophic bacteria, and unfavourable methane/oxygen ratios in the methane oxidation horizon. Against this background, methane oxidation factors that will remain low are deduced for the open and, where applicable, for the temporarily covered MBT landfill. Higher methane oxidation achievements require the dimensioning of the soil/recultivation layer for methane oxidation, corresponding soil selection, as well as a high-quality constructive realisation during the application, and a monitoring programme, so that the deduced methane oxidation factor reflects the "system methane oxidation capacity" (Table 1). Table 1: Suggestions for default values of the methane oxidation factor OX as a function of the emitted methane volume flow and the covering situation of MBT disposal sites, ranges of variation Landfill phase / covering situation Deposition phase: Open disposal area Deposition/closure phase: Temporary covering with humic soil Closure/post-closure phase: Technically optimised methane oxidation layer with monitoring and maintenance/repair works OX at an average surface load < 4 l CH 4 /m 2 *h [ - ] 0.1 ± 0.1 0.15 ± 0.1 0.6 ± 0.2 OX at an average surface load < 2 l CH 4 /m 2 *h [ - ] 0.1 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 0.7 ± 0.2 OX at an average surface load < 0.5 l CH 4 /m 2 *h [ - ] 0.2 ± 0.1 0.45 ± 0.2 0.75 ± 0.2

5 6 Examination of the First Order Decay model Based on the evaluation and deduction of default values for the estimation of methane emissions from MBT disposal sites, the First Order Decay (FOD) model of the IPCC guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, 2006 1, is examined and adjusted. The IPCC methods are based upon a 1 st order approach. Three grades exist ("Tier 1 to Tier 3"), with which the quality of the estimation is classified depending on the raw data. The expert opinion was planned in such a manner that, in the future, the highest grade can be reached ("Tier 3"), when more monitoring results from MBT disposal sites are available. The examination of the FOD model, in connection with the evaluations regarding the gas balance of MBT disposal sites, shows that there is no reason justifying the principle divergence from this model. Therefore, the model was validated and thus adjusted to the emission behaviour of MBT disposal sites for the following data and emission factors: Deposited MBT waste amounts Methane formation potential (L 0 ) "Methane Correction Factor" (MCF) Methane share in the produced landfill gas (F) Oxidation factors (OX) Half-lives (t 1/2 or H) Share of methane (R) collected via a technical gas collection system Delay time (time interval from the deposition to the start of intensive anaerobic degradation processes) The results regarding the gas balance of MBT disposal sites that have been available until now do not yet allow for statistical evaluations, but the acquired data and the deduced emission factors can be classified as quite comprehensive and complete in the sense of the IPCC guidelines, to estimate the methane emissions from MBT disposal sites. With continuous updating of the estimation, the indicated uncertainties regarding several emission factors, such as the half-life or the methane oxidation rate, are increasingly reduced. 1 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Chapter 3, Solid Waste Disposal; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

6 7 Estimation regarding methane emissions from MBT disposal sites On the basis of the evaluation of the methane formation potential of MBT material, half-lives, methane oxidation, and landfill-related boundary conditions, the methane emissions and the correspondingly resulting contamination of the atmosphere with carbon dioxide equivalents are estimated. The gas forecast calculation is still carried out via a 1 st order approach using the deduced assumed and default values. The estimation shows that the primal gas production already takes place during the filling phase and the first years of the closure/post-closure phase. As, particularly in this phase, only minor methane oxidation at the landfill surface is assumed for an open disposal area, the most intensive emissions into the atmosphere occur during this time. They decrease significantly with the application of a surface sealing designed for methane oxidation. Figure 2 presents an example for an MBA landfill section regarding the landfill gas production, the resulting methane emissions (including reduction through methane oxidation), and the added-up emissions relevant to the climate as CO 2 equivalents. For the chosen assumptions, and as an estimation on the safe side, up to 266 kg CO 2 -eq./mgts of deposited MBT waste are emitted, and thereof up to approximately 80% of this total emission load already during the filling phase. The long-term landfill gas emissions would be negligible approximately 10 to 15 years subsequent to the completion of the filling process and application of the surface sealing with a methane oxidation function. If more favourable assumptions are chosen regarding the landfill gas potential, the aerobic degradation of the deposited organic material and the methane oxidation at the open landfill surface to cover the variation ranges and uncertainties, the emissions will decrease correspondingly. The estimation of the current total methane emissions of all MBT disposal sites in Germany finally results in a large range between 60,000 and 135,000 Mg CO 2 -eq./a. During the years to come, at an average annual deposition in the

sum of emissions [Mg CO2-eq.] emission rate [kg CO2-eq./h] gas production [m 3 /h] "Methane emissions from the disposal of mechanically-biologically treated waste" 7 previous magnitude of approximately 1 million Mg MBT waste moist mass, they may increase to approximately 90,000 to 210,000 Mg CO 2 eq./a. 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 H differentiated, Pt total MBT landfill section 2,40 2,10 1,80 1,50 1,20 0,90 0,60 methane flux [l/m 2 *h] 10 0,30 0 0,00 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 OX = 0.1 OX = 0.7 OX = 0.75 emission rate CO2-equivalents after methane oxidation 0 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 80.000 70.000 60.000 50.000 40.000 30.000 20.000 10.000 total sum of CO2-equivalents after methane oxidation 0 2005 2015 2025 2035 2045 2055 2065 2075 Fig. 2: Example MBT disposal site: landfill gas production and remaining methane emissions into the atmosphere in carbon dioxide equivalents subsequent to methane oxidation

8 8 Conclusions Conclusions regarding the methane emissions of deposited MBT waste: MBT plants are operated in accordance with the specifications of the Landfill Ordinance, and in such a manner that the waste partial stream to be deposited does not exceed a biological residual activity and the corresponding landfill gas formation. On the one hand, the reduction of the gaseous emissions of approximately 80 to 90% is ensured with this. On the other hand, with 30 to 40 Nm 3 /MgTS, the MBT waste still shows a landfill gas formation potential that can also be ascertained on former municipal solid waste landfills, approximately 10 to 20 years subsequent to the completion of the filling process. In the practice of waste emplacement and landfill operation, the MBT waste boasts rather favourable initial conditions for the start or continuation of biodegradation processes (homogeneity, moisture). For the gas production, this means that a larger share of the total gas potential with a short half-life is formed already in the deposition phase. Conclusions regarding monitoring measures: Evaluations of FID measurements at MBT disposal sites, compared with the forecasted residual gas production, point out that FID inspections are suitable only to a very limited extent to reliably estimate methane emissions from MBT disposal sites. FID measurements are very strongly influenced by boundary conditions, such as air pressure variations, the water saturation degree of the surface and preferred emanation zones (hot spots). The data available for gaseous emissions from MBT disposal sites only improves gradually as a result of regular monitoring measures, as larger amounts of MBT waste are deposited in accordance with the applying requirements only during recent years. The requirements regarding the monitoring of landfill gas emissions are stipulated in Annex 5 of the Landfill Ordinance. The evaluations show that significant methane emissions can already develop shortly after deposition. Therefore, measurements regarding the methane formation and methane oxidation should particularly be carried out during this phase.

9 Besides the monitoring measures and verifications in accordance with the requirements of the DepV, a scientific investigation program with regard to the emission behaviour of MBT disposal sites would be useful to cover the statements and the deduced values and forecasts with respect to the methane formation (methane formation potential and half-lives) and the release into the atmosphere (reducing influence of methane oxidation). In the evaluation, the uncertainties of the deduced emission factors, on which the emission forecast is based, are identified. These uncertainties concern, in particular, the monitoring results regarding the gas balance of MBT disposal sites that are available only to a small extent. With the future monitoring results and probable supplementary investigations, those uncertainties can be reduced in order to further substantiate and assure the forecast of methane emissions from MBT disposal sites. Issued by: Dr.-Ing. Kai-Uwe Heyer Tel.: +00 49 40 77 11 07 42 Dr.-Ing. Karsten Hupe Tel.: +00 49 40 77 11 07 41 Prof. Dr.-Ing. Rainer Stegmann Tel.: +00 49 40 77 11 07 41 Fax: +00 49 40 77 11 07 43 Prof. R. Stegmann und Partner Schellerdamm 19-21 21079 Hamburg Germany E-mail: heyer@ifas-hamburg.de http://www.ifas-hamburg.de