Multi-Period Spectra. Charlie Kircher. Kircher & Associates Palo Alto, California

Similar documents
EERI Seminar on Next Generation Attenuation Models. SC10 - New Structural and Geotechnical Seismic Design Requirements in the 2015 NEHRP Provisions

Progress Report on the Technical Development of the 2014 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions

Seismic and Geotechnical Data Requirements in the 2010 California Building Code

An Introduction to the 2015 NEHRP Recommended Seismic Provisions for New Buildings and Other Structures

Ground Motions for Performance-Based Seismic Design

Assessment of the Dynamic Response of the Soil to Strong Ground Motion at a Wind Farm

An overview of seismic ground motion design criteria for transportation infrastructures in USA

Site-Specific Seismic Studies for Optimal Structural Design. Soil Site. Rock Site. Copyright. magazine

Consideration of torsional irregularity in Modal Response Spectrum Analysis

Validation of the 2000 NEHRP Provisions Equivalent Lateral Force and Modal Analysis Procedures for Buildings with Damping Systems

TIME HISTORY RESPONSE PREDICTION FOR MULTI-STOREY BUILDINGS UNDER EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS

A comparative study of design seismic hazard in major national codes

SELECTION AND SCALING OF GROUND MOTION RECORDS FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS

CHALLENGES IN SPECIFYING GROUND MOTIONS FOR DESIGN OF TALL BUILDINGS IN HIGH SEISMIC REGIONS OF THE UNITED STATES

Development of the 2020 NEHRP Provisions ASCE/SEI 7-16 Adoption Report

Seismically Rated Fans

Seismic Analysis Values with Spreadsheet

SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION ANALYSIS INCLUDING GROUND MOTION INCOHERENCY EFFECTS

REINFORCED CONCRETE WALL BOUNDARY ELEMENT LONGITUDINAL REINFORCING TERMINATION

Damping Coefficients for Weak and Moderate Earthquake Ground Motions

A Methodology to Assess Seismic Performance of Water Supply Systems

Spectral Design Analysis of Sliding Hinge Joints and HF2V Devices for Seismic Dissipation

Selecting and Scaling Earthquake Ground Motions for Performing Response-History Analyses

7. Seismic Design. 1) Read.

EARTHQUAKE LATERAL FORCE ANALYSIS. Dr. Jagadish. G. Kori Professor & Head Civil Engineering Department Govt. Engineering College, Haveri

IMPROVING SEISMIC PERFORMANCE: ADD STIFFNESS OR DAMPING? Trevor E. Kelly 1

EFFECTS OF STRONG-MOTION DURATION ON THE RESPONSE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME BUILDINGS ABSTRACT

Investigation of Seismic Response of Steel MRF Building Structures with Nonlinear Viscous Dampers Using Real- Time Hybrid Simulation

Chapter 15 Commentary STRUCTURES WITH DAMPING SYSTEMS

Seismic Design & Retrofit of Bridges- Geotechnical Considerations

Performance-based seismic design in the United States

Seismic Issues and Building Codes for Kentucky

PORT-WIDE GROUND MOTION STUDY PORT OF LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA

Key Words: Seismic Risk, Hazard analysis, Fragility analysis, Radiation dose, evaluation response spectrum

Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska

Seismic Assessment of an RC Building Using Pushover Analysis

Rapid Risk Assessment Method RRAM

Special Civil Engineer Examination Seismic Principles Test Plan

CONSIDERATION OF NEAR-FAULT GROUND MOTION EFFECTS IN SEISMIC DESIGN

U.S. CODE DEVELOPMENT FOR BUILDINGS WITH ADDED DAMPING

New Ground Motion Spectral Response Accelerations for Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings

Nonlinear Response-History Analysis for the Design of New Buildings: A Fully Revised Chapter 16 Methodology for ASCE 7-16

Inelastic Deformation Demands of Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Frames Strengthened with Buckling-Restrained Braces

Trends in the Seismic Design Provisions of U.S. Building Codes

A methodology for post-mainshock probabilistic assessment of building collapse risk

Fragility Analysis of a Water Supply System

SEISMIC ISOLATION STANDARD FOR CONTINUED FUNCTIONALITY. Table C.3-1. Resiliency Criteria Limits for Structure Design Categories

Dynamic Analysis of High Rise Seismically Isolated Buildings

Seismic Design of Bridges. Lucero E. Mesa, P.E.

OUTLINE. Seismic Performance of the Seismically Isolated Los Caras Bridge. Seismic Hazard of Ecuador. Ecuador. Dr. Enrique Morales

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION... 1

Design Provisions for Earthquake Resistance of Structures. The Standards Institution of Israel

Coyne et Bellier, TEAS Consultant Almaty, February 2013

AN EVALUATION OF THE AASHTO UNIFORM LOAD METHOD FOR ESTIMATING FORCES AND DEFORMATIONS IN SEISMICALLY ISOLATED BRIDGE SYSTEMS

Response of TBI case study buildings

r clarke 1 INTRODUCTION TO IBC SEISMIC FORCES

Concept of Earthquake Resistant Design

EVALUATION OF SEISMIC PERFORMANCE FACTORS FOR CHEVRON BUCKLING RESTRAINED BRACED FRAMES

LIGHTLY DAMPED MOMENT RESISTING STEEL FRAMES

DEFLECTION AMPLIFICATION FACTORS FOR DUCTILE BRACED FRAMES

Engineering judgement on the use of American s anchor performance provisions along with the European seismic action definition

by Dr. Mark A. Ketchum, OPAC Consulting Engineers for the EERI 100 th Anniversary Earthquake Conference, April 17, 2006

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE SEISMIC PROVISIONS BETWEEN IRAQI SEISMIC CODES 2014 AND 1997 FOR KURDISTAN REGION/IRAQ

CANDU 6 Nuclear Power Plant: Reactor building floor response spectra considering seismic wave incoherency

Floor Response Spectra Generation for Seismic Design of Buildings

SEISMIC ENGINEERING GUIDELINES

PERFORMANCE-BASED PLASTIC DESIGN AND ENERGY-BASED EVALUATION OF SEISMIC RESISTANT RC MOMENT FRAME

Selection of a Suite of Ground Motions for Boston and its Application to Unreinforced Masonry Structures

IBC Structural Provisions: A Better Alternative

SEISMIC QUALIFICATION OF THE EQUIPMENT FOR LOVIISA PLANT AUTOMATION RENEWAL PROJECT

PVP2006-ICPVT

Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Turkey Part II: Inclusion of Site Characteristics

ASCE 7 Seismic Performance Basis and Potential Modifications for Design of Low Hazard Nuclear Facilities

Seismic Soil Pressure for Building Walls-An Updated Approach

Assessment of Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) methods for non-linear dynamic analyses of structures

SEISMIC SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION (SSI) EFFECTS FOR A DIFFERENT TYPE OF BUILDINGS IN DENSE URBAN AREA


THE NEW ZEALAND LOADINGS CODE AND ITS APPLICATION TO THE DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESISTANT PRESTRESSED CONCRETE STRUCTURES

Seismic response of highway bridges under multi-directional motions. *Li Shan 1)1)

The Effectiveness of Performance Based Design to Establish Architectural Feature of Structural Design for Slender Building

Seismic Safety of Nonstructural Components and Systems in Medical Facilities

Seismic Design & Qualification Methods An Interpretation of the IBC 2006 & ASCE 7 Code

Building Seismic Safety Council

A CASE STUDY OF SCENARIO EARTHQUAKE-BASED RISK ASSESSMENT FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS

Thessaloniki, 5th November, 2007 Design seismic actions and determination of action effects using appropriate computational tools

Linear and nonlinear analysis for seismic design of piping system

EFFECTS OF DETAIL SPATIAL VARIATION OF SLIP AMPLITUDE ON THE GROUND MOTIONS

Transactions, SMiRT-22 San Francisco, California, USA - August 18-23, 2013 Division V

Seismic Impact Zone Demonstration, Ponds M5 and M7, Reid Gardner Station

Inelastic Versus Elastic Displacement-Based Intensity Measures for Seismic Analysis

Earthquake Loss Estimation in Seoul Metropolitan Regions in Korea under Moderate Earthquake Scenarios

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PURE AND APPLIED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

Preliminary Identification of Dynamic Characteristics of a Unique Building in Chile following 27 February 2010 (M w =8.

Near Source Fault Effects on the Performance of Base- Isolated Hospital Building vs. a BRBF Hospital Building

NONBUILDING STRUCTURE DESIGN

Design of base-isolated buildings: An overview of international codes

The Next Generation of Codes for Seismic Isolation and Supplemental Damping

The Seismic Isolation Standard for Continual Functionality specifies criteria for isolator properties that limit seismic damage to less than 2%, 4%,

SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

COMPARATIVE SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF RC FRAME BUILDINGS DESIGNED FOR ASCE 7 AND IS 1893

Transcription:

Multi-Period Spectra Charlie Kircher Kircher & Associates Palo Alto, California

Design Response Spectrum (Figure 11.4-1, ASCE 7-10 with annotation) S DS = 2/3 x S MS = 2/3 x F a x S s S D1 = 2/3 x S M1 = 2/3 x F v x S 1 C s = S DS /(R/I e ) C s = S D1/T(R/I e ) T T s T s < T T L Acceleration Domain T S = S D1 /S DS Velocity Domain Displacement Domain

Example ELF Design Spectrum based on ASCE 7-16 Criteria M7.0 earthquake ground motions at R X = 6.5 km, Site Class C Response Spectral Accelertation (g) 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 MCEr Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class BC MCEr Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class C Design Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class C ELF Design Spectrum (Cs x R/Ie) - Current ASCE 7-16 Criteria 0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 Period (seconds)

Example ELF Design Spectrum based on ASCE 7-16 Criteria M7.0 earthquake ground motions at R X = 6.5 km, Site Class D Response Spectral Accelertation (g) 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 MCEr Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class BC MCEr Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class D Design Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class D ELF Design Spectrum (Cs x R/Ie) - Current ASCE 7-16 Criteria 0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 Period (seconds)

Example ELF Design Spectrum based on ASCE 7-16 Criteria M7.0 earthquake ground motions at R X = 6.5 km, Site Class E Response Spectral Accelertation (g) 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 MCEr Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class BC MCEr Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class E Design Multi-Period Response Spectrum - Site Class E ELF Design Spectrum (Cs x R/Ie) - Current ASCE 7-16 Criteria 0.0 0.1 1.0 10.0 Period (seconds)

Root Cause of the Problem Section 11.4 of ASCE 7-10 (ASCE 7-16) - Use of only two response periods (0.2s and 1.0s) to define ELF (and MRSA) design forces is not sufficient, in general, to accurately represent response spectral acceleration for all design periods Reasonably Accurate (or Conservative) When peak MCE R response spectral acceleration occurs at or near 0.2s and peak MCE R response spectral velocity occurs at or near 1.0s for the site of interest (i.e., frequency content matches the shape of the design response spectrum, Figure 11.4-1) Potentially Non-conservative When peak MCE R response spectral velocity occurs at periods greater than 1.0s for the site of interest (e.g., soil sites whose seismic hazard is dominated by large magnitude events)

Short-Term Solution Options (ASCE 7-16) Re-formulate seismic parameters to eliminate potential nonconservatism in ELF (and MRSA) seismic forces Require site-specific analysis when ELF (and MSRA) seismic forces could be potentially non-conservative

ASCE 7-16 Short-Term Solution to Potential Underestimation of ELF (and MSRA) Seismic Design Forces Temporary Solution. The new site-specific design requirements of Section 11.4.7 provide a short-term solution that can and should be replaced by a more appropriate long-term solution in the next Code cycle Multi-Period Design Spectra. A long-term solution would necessarily include seismic criteria described by multiperiod MCE R response spectra Design Spectrum Shape. Ideally, multi-period design spectra would directly incorporate site, basin and other effects that influence the shape (i.e., frequency content) of the design spectrum

Summary of Multi-Period Spectra Issue Develop and adopt multi-period design spectrum approach Tentative Framework for the Development of Advanced Seismic Design Criteria for New Buildings NIST GCR 12-917-20 Risks - Multi-period spectrum approach would require: Major reworking of seismic design requirements and criteria now based on two response periods (e.g., Tables 11.6-1/2, Seismic Design Categories, etc.) Development of new ground motion design values maps (by the USGS) for each new response period of interest Development of new site factor tables for each new response period of interest (or site effects embedded directly in ground motion design values maps) Resources Major, multi-year projects by USGS and a Seismic Code-development team(s)