Southern Finland regional analysis

Similar documents
Country fact sheet. Land cover Liechtenstein. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Switzerland. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Luxembourg. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Malta. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Norway. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Land Cover / Land Use & Digital Elevation Maps. These are required for almost all coastal products involving the terrestrial side.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia

Changes of artificial surfaces in Slovakia

Country fact sheet. Land cover Kosovo* September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA. *Under UNSCR 1244/99.

Country fact sheet. Land cover Cyprus. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Finland. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Romania. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Denmark. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Albania. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Austria. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Slovenia. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 15

Country fact sheet. Land cover Serbia. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Sweden. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Bulgaria. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Turkey. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Germany. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Slovakia. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 50000

Country fact sheet. Land cover Spain. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Portugal. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 8000

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 12000

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 1000

Country fact sheet. Land cover Poland. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Italy. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Czech Republic. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

Country fact sheet. Land cover Hungary. September Photo: Toni García, My City/EEA

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 20000

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] % 1

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha]

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 5000

Methodological notes for the calculation of Total Surface Area and Land surface area for all NUTS

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 20000

Translation of the CORINE Land Cover nomenclature to the Land Cover Meta Language using LCCS3

Open Linked Data in Portugal

Use of CORINE Land Cover in delivering the EEA strategy

1.2. Net change in land cover [ha] 50000

CORINE land cover nomenclature definitions

Corine Land Cover and Land & Ecosystem Accounting tools

Optimization of the Hub Height of a Wind Turbine

Overview of land cover & change

The European Environment s Agency requirements for Meteorological and Climatic data

Land & Ecosystem Accounts in Europe. Ronan Uhel & Jean-Louis Weber

for Wildland Fire GOFC-GOLD Fire IT Workshop October 2011 Stresa, Italy

The wetland ecosystems in MAES nomenclature

ASSESSMENT AND SCENARIOS OF LAND USE CHANGE IN EUROPE

Annex 2.1 The dynamic use of land in the period

A Framework for Land Accounting - Draft Set of Tables

TOWARDS ESTIMATING EMISSIONS FROM GM AND CM IN THE UK

PRIORITISATION OF TARGET AREAS FOR FOREST RESTORATION. Final Report. Produced by WCMC for WWF International

Land Accounts. March 2018

Tier 1 estimation of GHG emissions from organic soils in Cropland Management (CM) and Grazing Land Management (GM) at EU level

LCEU11 = Rainfed herbaceous cropland Total LCEU08. LCEU09 Summary Table

JRC Contribution to MAES-SOIL Workshop

Forest/Grassland, Secondary / Vegetation. not used

Key requirements of ecosystem service classification for ecosystem accounting

European Mapping activities and results

GIS-based Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Mountain Regions:

Supplementary material. Assessing the effect of a fuel break network to reduce burnt area and wildfire risk transmission

VEGETATIVE, WATER, FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES POLICIES

Habitat Quality: Model Overview

Overview of the SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting with examples from the Netherlands. Sjoerd Schenau Statistics Netherlands

Benefits of SSSIs in England and Wales

SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF LAND COVER AND LAND USE CHANGES IN BULGARIA FOR THE PERIOD BASED ON IMAGE AND CORINE LAND COVER DATA

Means of forest management to adapt to climate change Seppo Kellomäki

Oslo, September. Brendan Freeman. UK Office for National Statistics

Manual of CORINE Land Cover changes

The thematic accuracy of Corine land cover 2000

Ecosystem accounting at the European Environment Agency: a summary of progress 1

An Eco-metric Approach to Growing Natural Capital. Alison Smith, ECI, University of Oxford CIWEM Environmental Net Gain Conference 30 October 2018

The UNCCD is the custodian agency leading an Inter-Agency Advisory Group on

Peatland Restoration in Finland - 25 years of practise makes an

Mekong Wetland Assets

Forest and climate change

3. Forests and semi-natural areas Forests Shrub and/or herbaceous vegetation associations Open spaces with little or no vegetation

Collect Earth an innovative tool

Eionet NRC Soil Meeting 15. Oct. 2015

Annex. Suggestion for EC GIG

Approach to Simplified Ecosystem Capital Accounts

Kent Biodiversity 2020 and beyond a strategy for the natural environment

Beverly. Produced in This report and associated map provide information about important sites for biodiversity conservation in your area.

DEGRADATION IN EAST KALIMANTAN

Mapping of ecosystems and their services

A valuation of the natural capital of the Cam and Ely- Ouse catchment. Final report prepared for WWF-UK Appendix 2 August 2017

Defining spatial priorities for capercaillie Tetrao urogallus lekking landscape conservation in south-central Finland

Implementation of Tier 1 for Mineral Soil under Cropland and Grassland in EU MS

DANUBEparksCONNECTED Workshop Corridor Land

AP Environmental Science

6 TH. Most of the Earth Is Covered with Water (2) Most Aquatic Species Live in Top, Middle, or Bottom Layers of Water (1)

6. Land take by intensive agriculture

Habitat mapping for valuation of biodiversity and ecosystem functions in the Czech Republic

Chapter 8 Natural Resources

Society for the Conserv ation of Philippine Wetlands. Inc.

Transcription:

Southern Finland regional analysis

Background for the exercise Training example and data created originally for training of regional council of Southern Finland 2013 Aims at presenting a realitic, yet simplified Zonation setup Note: Data has been generalised and is partially invented

Background for the analyses General plan process to be started for the region Aim: to ensure sustainable well-being and competitiveness Including: Safeguarding biodiversity and ecosystem services Zonation is used to identify important and less valuable areas for biodiversity and ecosystem services NOTE: this is a training example with simplifications and invented data J

Land use in Uusimaa region Vegetation and land use Source: Uudenmaan liitto

Principal formations in the area Source: Uudenmaan liitto

Data structure in Southern Finland Z

Project structure in S Finland Z

Important data sets

MASK: Analysis area mask

SPECIES: Occurrence of rare species

HABITAT: FOREST, Birch forest index Sirkiä, S., Lehtomäki, J., Lindén, H., Tomppo, E. & Moilanen, A. 2012: Defining spatial priorities for capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking landscape conservation in south-central Finland. Wildlife Biology 18: 337 353

HABITAT: FOREST, Pine forest index Sirkiä, S., Lehtomäki, J., Lindén, H., Tomppo, E. & Moilanen, A. 2012: Defining spatial priorities for capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking landscape conservation in south-central Finland. Wildlife Biology 18: 337 353

Corine Land Cover nomenclature (25 m) CLC2000- NOMENCLATURE 1 ARTIFICIAL AREAS 1.1 Urban fabric 1.1.1 Continuous urban fabric 1.1.2 Discontinuous urban fabric 1.2 Industrial, commercial and transport units 1.2.1 Industrial or commercial units 1.2.2 Road and rail networks and associated land 1.2.3 Port areas 1.2.4 Airports 1.3 Mine, dump and construction sites 1.3.1 Mineral extraction sites 1.3.2 Dump sites 1.3.3 Construction sites 1.4 Artificial non-agricultural vegetated areas 1.4.1 Green urban areas 1.4.2 Sport and leisure facilities 2 AGRICULTURAL AREAS 2.1 Arable land 2.1.1 Non-irrigated arable land 2.1.2 Permanently irrigated land 2.1.3 Rice fields 2.2 Permanent crops 2.2.1 Vineyards 2.2.2 Fruit trees and berry plantations 2.2.3 Olive groves 2.3 Pastures 2.3.1 Pastures 2.4 Heterogeneous agricultural areas 2.4.1 Annual crops associated with permanent crops 2.4.2 Complex cultivation patterns 2.4.2 Peltojen ja niittyjen muodostama mosaiikki 2.4.3 Land principally occupied by agriculture, with significant areas of natural vegetation 2.4.4 Agro-forestry areas 3. FOREST AND SEMI-NATURAL AREAS 3.1 Forests 3.1.1 Broad-leaved forest 3.1.2 Coniferous forest 3.1.3 Mixed forest 3.2 Shrubs and/or herbaceous vegetation associations 3.2.1 Natural grassland 3.2.2 Moors and heathland 3.2.3 Sclerophylous vegetation 3.2.4 Transitional woodland/shrub 3.3 Open spaces with little or no vegetation 3.3.1 Beaches, dunes, and sand plains 3.3.2 Bare rock 3.3.3 Sparsely vegetated areas 3.3.4 Burnt areas 3.3.5 Glaciers and perpetual snow 4. WETLANDS 4.1 Inland wetlands 4.1.1 Inland marshes 4.1.2 Peatbogs 4.2 Coastal wetland 4.2.1 Salt marshes 4.2.2 Salines 4.2.3 Intertidal flats 5. WATER BODIES 5.1 Inland waters 5.1.1 Water courses 5.1.2 Water bodies 5.2 Marine waters 5.2.1 Coastal lagoons 5.2.2 Estuaries 5.2.3 Sea and ocean

Corine land cover data Original classification in 25 m resolution Agricultural areas Wetlands Peatlands Non-irrigated arable land 1 Fruit trees & berry plantations 6 Pastures 3 Inland marshes 1 Salt marshes 1 Salines 1 Intertidal flats 1 Peatbogs 1

Corine land cover data Original classification in 25 m resolution Agricultural areas Wetlands Peatlands Aggregation to 100 m Sum of agrivalues Sum of wetland values Sum of peatland values

HABITATS: Peatlands

HABITATS: Wetlands

HABITATS: Agricultural lands ranked with their BD value

HABITATS: traditional rural biotopes, nationally, regionally, locally important

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: Groundwater areas

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES: Recreational areas

Land cover à Condition layer 1.3.2 Dump sites 0 1.3.3 Construction sites 0.1 1.4.1 Green urban areas 0.7 1.4.2 Sport and leisure facilities 0.7 1.4.2 Sport and leisure facilities 0.7 1.4.2 Sport and leisure facilities 0.7 2.1.1 Non-irrigated arable land 0.3 2.1.1 Non-irrigated arable land 0.3 2.2.2 Fruit trees and berry plantations 0.4 2.3.1 Pastures 0.4 3.1.1 Broad-leaved forest 0.9 3.1.1 Broad-leaved forest 0.9 3.1.2 Coniferous forest 0.9 3.1.2 Coniferous forest 0.9 3.1.2 Coniferous forest 0.9 3.1.3 Mixed forest 0.9 3.2.4 Transitional woodland/shrub 0.9 3.2.4 Transitional woodland/shrub 0.9 3.2.4 Transitional woodland/shrub 0.9 3.2.4 Transitional woodland/shrub 0.9 3.2.4 Transitional woodland/shrub 0.9 3.3.1 Beaches, dunes, and sand plains 0.9 3.3.2 Bare rock 0.9 4.1.1 Inland marshes 0.9 4.1.1 Inland marshes 0.9 4.1.2 Peatbogs 0.9 Peat extraction 0 4.2.3 Intertidal flats 0.9 4.2.3 Intertidal flats 0.9 5.1.1 Water courses 0.9 5.1.2 Water bodies 0.9 5.1.2 Water bodies 0.9

CONDITION: All land use

CONSERVATION: All conservation areas

CONSERVATION / LANDUSE: Hierarchical mask

What is the aim of the analysis? What BD features are needed for prioritization? Protection of certain species or balanced solution? - Data sets? - Weights? - Cell removal rules

Step-by-step development of the analyses Forest data only (UML_01_M_abf) Forests + other environments (UML_02_MSP_abf) Forests, other environments, forest connectivity (UML_03_MSP_mc_abf) Forests, other environments, forest connectivity + ecosystem services (UML_04_MSP_mc_ESS_L_abf) As previously + condition layer (UML_05_MSP_mck_ESS_L_abf) As previously + harmful land use and negative connectivity (UML_06_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf) As previously + current protection (UML_07_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf_HM1) As in UML_6 + current plans (UML_08_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf_HM2)

Step-by-step development of the analyses 1. UML_01_M_abf 2. UML_02_MSP_abf 3. UML_03_MSP_mc_abf 4. UML_04_MSP_mc_ESS_L_abf 5. UML_05_MSP_mck_ESS_L_abf 6. UML_06_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf 7. UML_07_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf_HM1 8. UML_08_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf_HM2

Codes in the names are interpreted as follows: UML = Uudenmaanliitto M = Forests (Metsät) S = Peatlands and wetlands (Suot ja kosteikot) P = Agricultural areas (Pellot ja perinnebiotoopit) ESS = Ecosystem services L = Species data (Lajiaineistot) mc = matrix connectivity k = Condition layer (kuntokerros) i = Interaction connectivity, negative landuse (interaktiot) HM1 = Hierarchical mask 1 (Regional zoning) HM2 = Hierarchical mask 2 (Protected areas) abf = Additive benefit function

UML_01_M_abf Prioritization using forest indices for four forest types Sirkiä, S., Lehtomäki, J., Lindén, H., Tomppo, E. & Moilanen, A. 2012: Defining spatial priorities for capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus) lekking landscape conservation in southcentral Finland. Wildlife Biology 18: 337 353

UML_01_M_abf Weights for individual layers List of BD features

UML_02_MSP_abf Forest index layers + other land uses (Peatlands, wetlands, agriculture: traditional rural biotopes + agricultural areas)

UML_03_MSP_mc_abf Forest index layers + other land uses (Peatlands, wetlands, agriculture: traditional rural biotopes + agricultural areas) Habitat connectivity

UML_04_MSP_mc_ESS_L_abf Habitat data + species data + ecosystem services Habitat connectivity Grouping of results

UML_05_MSP_mck_ESS_L_abf Habitat data + species data + ecosystem services Habitat connectivity Grouping of results Habitat condition

UML_06_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf Habitat data + species data + ecosystem services Habitat connectivity Grouping of results Habitat condition Negative connectivity to harmful landuse

Other Data Layers

UML_07_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf_HM1 Habitat data + species data + ecosystem services Habitat connectivity Grouping of results Habitat condition Negative connectivity to harmful landuse Hierarchical mask with regional plan (3 levels; 3 = PA, 2 = Planned green areas, 1 = the rest)

CONSERVATION / LANDUSE: Hierarchical mask

UML_08_MSP_mcki_ESS_L_abf_HM2 Habitat data + species data + ecosystem services Habitat connectivity Grouping of results Habitat condition Negative connectivity to harmful landuse Hierarchical mask with all protected area

Explore yourself!

Good luck!