OVERVIEW OF NEW MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR CRAB FISHERIES IN THE RUSSIAN WATERS

Similar documents
Ecosystem dynamics and fisheries management in the Barents sea

Result of 2016 Harvest Control Rule evaluation for Barents Sea capelin. Bjarte Bogstad (IMR), Dmitry Prozorkevich (PINRO), Samuel Subbey (IMR)

1.2 Advice May

Ecosystem drivers of stock production are rarely implemented in tactical fisheries management

Decision-Making Under Uncertainty

New England Fishery Management Council MEMORANDUM. July 28, 2009

EASTERN GEORGES BANK COD

Draft interim management plan for boarfish. Maurice Clarke, Marine Institute

Glossary of terms for harvest strategies, management procedures and management strategy evaluation

Stock Assessment and ABC Calculation for Japanese Sardine (Sardinops Melanostictus) in the Northwestern Pacific under Japanese TAC System

Ocean Acidification: what is it and how will it affect coastal Alaska communities

Advice June 2012

ICES Special Request Advice Greater North Sea Ecoregion Published 11 October 2016

Report of the Basic Document Working Group to The Joint. Norwegian-Russian Fishery Commission, autumn 2003.

Advice July 2014

Additional draft impacts of ABC control rule alternatives

EU request on criteria for CITES non-detriment finding for European eel (Anguilla anguilla)

Special request, Advice May 2013

Evolution of Ecosystem-based Fishery Management

Fish Conservation and Management

Application of Surplus-Production Models to Splendid Alfonsin Stock in the Southern Emperor and Northern Hawaiian Ridge (SE-NHR)

Advice June 2012

ABSTRACT. Keywords: sailfin sandfish, Arctoscopus japonicus, fishing moratorium, management policy, agestructured model, environmental factor

Stock Assessment Form Demersal species Reference year: Reporting year:

Changes to the default tree, v1.3 to v2.0

Ecological Data Requirements to Support Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management. Examples from Pelagic Longline Tuna Fisheries

Overview of Risk Policy and Managing for Uncertainty Across the Regional Fishery Management Councils

A Framework for Ecosystem Impacts Assessment Using an Indicator Approach

Joint EIFAAC/ICES/GFCM Working Group on Eels (WGEEL), 2014

Emma Orlova, Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography, Murmansk, Russia

Assessments of Black Rockfish (Sebastes melanops) Stocks in California, Oregon and Washington Coastal Waters

North Pacific Fisheries Management Council Bering Sea / Aleutian Islands King and Tanner Crab Working Group

STOCK ASSESSMENT AND HARVEST ADVICE FOR ROCK SOLE (LEPIDOPSETTA SPP.) IN BRITISH COLUMBIA

KEY: Use the following colors to indicate whether a Metric and Expected Response have been identified.

Long term sustainable management of living marine resources in the Northern Seas Bergen, March 2016

Haddock on the Southern Scotian Shelf and Bay of Fundy (Div. 4X/5Y)

Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in divisions 8.a b (northern and central Bay of Biscay)

Ecology, Evolution, and Game Theory at IIASA: Overview & Highlights. Ulf Dieckmann Program Director Evolution and Ecology Program

STUDENT VERSION FISHERY HARVESTING: ATLANTIC COD

MSC Certification Requirements Annex CB The Default Tree DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION 11 th September 26 th October

Maximum sustainable yield

2 Population dynamics modelling of culturebased fisheries

Combined Canada and USA catches in 2015 were 118 mt. This is the lowest value in the time series beginning in 1935.

JOINT RUSSIAN NORWEGIAN SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH PROGRAM ON LIVING MARINE RESOURCES IN Contents

Discarding occurs due to catch of undersized scallops and high-grading; the latter mainly occurs in

NMFS Kodiak Laboratory Crab Enhancement Research

Development in plankton community: the Barents Sea. E. Eriksen SEAPOP, April 2017

Concepts of marine ecosystem carrying capacity, and their application to NE Pacific herring populations

TWELFTH REGULAR SESSION Bali, Indonesia 3-8 December 2015 WWF POSITION STATEMENT FISHING WITHIN LIMITS. Paper by World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

Multiple Stable Points in Oyster Populations and Biological oogca Reference. Delaware Bay Oyster Beds

Sampling!effort! No*data*from*QC*North* Shore*or*An&cos&*Island* No*data*from*upper*Bay* of*fundy*

Report of the Working Group on the Biology and Assessment of Deep-sea Fisheries Resources (WGDEEP)

Assessing impacts of climate changes on fisheries: An EAF perspective

Status report for Russian fishing of cod and haddock / transhipment at sea

Deciding on Precautionary Management Measures for a Stock Based on a Suite of Limit Reference Points (LRPs) as a Basis for a Multi-LRP Harvest Law

DRAFT 1.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

SUMMARY OF PINK AND SPINY SCALLOP SURVEY RESULTS, AND MOVING TOWARDS PRECAUTIONARY APPROACH REFERENCE POINTS

Economic Effects of Hypoxia on Fisheries

TEACHER VERSION FISHERY HARVESTING: ATLANTIC COD

UNCOVER Project. UNderstanding the Mechanisms of Stock ReCOVERy

UNITS 1+2 REDFISH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY EVALUATION

The Future of Canada s Commercial Fisheries. - Discussion Document -

9.3.4 Advice May 2014

SAW/SARC-54 Summary (NEFSC CRD#12-14; #12-18) Presentation: Sept. 2012

Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission

NMFS Performance Metrics

Generic Metrics System

Report: How did the workshop help EcoFish?

Understanding Fish Stock Assessment. Gary Shepherd Northeast Fisheries Science Center Woods Hole, MA

Project UK Fisheries Improvement Action Plan

WCPFC HARVEST STRATEGY WORKSHOP. Stones Hotel Kuta, Bali 30 November 1 December 2015

Rendement maximal durable (RMD) définition, estimation. Maximum sustainable yield (MSY) definition, estimation. Alain Biseau, Ifremer, France

4/28/2013. Transmission of Light in Seawater. Color in the Ocean Color of ocean ranges from deep blue to yellow-green Factors Turbidity from runoff

A Guide to Fisheries Stock Assessment using the FMSP Tools. 6 References

Promoting Sustainable Seafood. Harnessing the market to protect fishery resources and the productivity of marine ecosystems

Supplement to the AI Pollock EA/RIR: Analysis of the Council s April Allocation Size Alternatives

Toward Adaptive Fisheries Management: Is the current fisheries management toolbox sufficient to address climate change?

REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON SEALS

Assessing impacts of human use

Impact of climate change on fisheries. Keith Brander ICES/GLOBEC Coordinator

Monitoring by direct surveys and integrated assessment of the Bay of Biscay anchovy ( ) To provide management advice

Essential elements of sustainable UK fisheries management

CLIMATE FLUCTUATIONS AND WALLEYE POLLOCK BIOMASS DYNAMICS. Oleg Bulatov

A Risk Assessment Framework for Fisheries in Natura 2000 sites in Ireland. December 2013 Version 1.3

Comments on Pacific Sardine Harvest Parameters

Target 75 Sector Update: Coldwater Crab

NOTE. Scenario C : A program documentation. Norwegian Computing Center SAMBA/04/05. Gro Hagen Tore Schweder. 31st January 2005

7.3 Cumulative Effects

21 st Century Climate Change Impacts on Marine Fisheries

Patterns of Productivity

Assessing impacts of climate stressors on near-coastal species at a regional scale (Gulf of California through Beaufort Sea)

DECLARATION OF THE HIGH-LEVEL CONFERENCE TOWARDS ENHANCED COOPERATION ON BLACK SEA FISHERIES AND AQUACULTURE ( BUCHAREST DECLARATION )

EVALUATING THE ROBUSTNESS OF MANAGEMENT PROCEDURES FOR THE SABLEFISH (ANOPLOPOMA FIMBRIA) FISHERY IN BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA FOR

Impacts of global warming on bio-products of marine and coastal system Ling TONG Qisheng TANG

SAW/SARC 62 S ummary (NEFSC CRD#17-01)

NORTHERN (NAFO DIVS. 2J3KL) COD STOCK UPDATE

Impact of limitation in interannual variations of cod yield on its stock dynamics. Anatoli Filin and Daniel Howell

Fisheries Improvement Action Plan

Topics. Lower Columbia River White Sturgeon Conservation Plan. Terms. Background. Background. Conservation Status 6/7/2011

Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF)

Transcription:

OVERVIEW OF NEW MANAGEMENT APPROACH FOR CRAB FISHERIES IN THE RUSSIAN WATERS Sergey Bakanev The Polar Research Institute of Marine Fisheries and Oceanography (PINRO), Murmansk, Russia The 17th Russian-Norwegian Symposium 16.03.2016-17.03.2016

CRAB SPECIES OF RUSSIAN FAR EAST CRAB SPECIES OF BARENTS SEA Red king crab 43% of total catch (6.3 ktons) King crabs Paralithodes camtschaticus (red king / Kamchatka / краб камчатский) Paralithodes platypus (blue king / краб синий) Paralithodes brevipes (spiny brown king / краб колючий) Lithodes aequispinus (golden king / brown king / краб равношипый) Snow crabs Chionoecetes opilio (opilio /queen /snow / краб-стригун опилио) Chionoecetes bairdi (tanner / snow / bairdi / краб-стригун берди/бэрда) Chionoecetes angulatus (triangle tanner / краб-стригун ангулятус) Chionoecetes japonicus (red snow / краб-стригун красный) Other crabs Eriocheir sinensis (hairy mitten / Японский мохнаторукий краб) Erimacrus isenbeckii (Japanese horsehair / краб волосатый четырехугольный) Snow crab 32% of total catch (8.9 ktons) Pacific ocean

RUSSIAN CRAB FISHERY IN 2015 Total catch is ~ 65 ktons Barents sea 23 % of total catch (15 ktons) Far East 77 % of total catch (50 ktons) CRAB SPECIES OF BARENTS SEA Red king crab 43% of total catch (6.3 ktons) Snow crab 32% of total catch (8.9 ktons) Pacific ocean

PREVIOUS MANAGEMENT SCHEME Biological objective is to prevent overfishing No explicit management strategy (no points and plans) Management mechanisms are regulation by TAC and technical regulation. TAC Technical regulation Permanent and temporary Current assessment Prediction of fishable stock biomass (FSB) Sex and size restrictions; Gear limitation; Season limitation; Area limitation TAC (proportion (%) of FSB ) There were no model assessment and prediction for the vast majority of stocks. Main assumption was prediction biomass is assumed to be equal of current biomass. So TAC of prediction year was a proportion (or percentage) of biomass for current year.

PREVIOUS MANAGEMENT SCHEME Prediction of FSB Healthy Management decisions Cautious Critical TAC 20-30 % of FSB 5-20 % of FSB No TAC Additional technical regulations Season and area limitations close fishery

PREVIOUS MANAGEMENT SCHEME Pros and cons Simple and understandable approach for biologists, managers and stakeholders. Standard practice and procedures for national fishery management. Flexible conditions for experts and decision makers. Does not provide transparency and accuracy in determining TAC. No exploitation plans and management strategies. No common and widespread approaches (reference points, uncertainty consederations, risk analysis, precautionary approach, data availability categorization). In 2015 Federal Agency for Fisheries ordered to develop a document was subsequently named as Basics of fishery management for crabs and craboids.

BASICS OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT FOR PRIORITY CRABS AND CRABOIDS 23 authors from 5 institutes 4 priority species for 33 stocks Paralithodes camtschaticus (red king / Kamchatka / краб камчатский) Paralithodes platypus (blue king / краб синий) Chionoecetes opilio (opilio /queen /snow / краб-стригун опилио) Chionoecetes bairdi (tanner / snow / bairdi / краб-стригун берди/бэрда) Craboids (8 legs) Crabs (10 legs)

BASICS OF FISHERY MANAGEMENT FOR PRIORITY CRABS AND CRABOIDS Main aim of paper is development of management plans for each stock. There are several steps to implement plan: Data and methods analysis. Stock categorization according data availability. Selection of assessment approach, parameters, drivers and indicators. Evaluation of referents points and current state of the stock. Retrospective analysis and set of maximum variation of TAC for prediction years. The formulation of a long-term exploitation target and development of management tools.

BASIC ELEMENTS Main steps for plan implementation Qualitative indicators Reference points Quantitative indicators State of the stock Exploitation rate Size of the stock Data availability Aim of exploitation Yield maximization Sustainable production Stock recovering Harvest Control Rule Management plan Maximum variation of TAC (%) Technical regulation

Data availability Data-rich population BASIC ELEMENTS DATA availability levels First level Assessment is age- or size - structured, so needs time series of age and/or size data and can estimate changes in fishery characteristics over time and can estimate fluctuations in annual recruitment, and has direct information on the fishing mortality of each year class entering the stock Second level Assessment based on time series of catch and an abundance index to support application of a dynamic production model Third level Assessment based on empirical trends and/or indicators in relative stock abundance Data-poor population

BASIC ELEMENTS Indicators of state of the stock Indicators are defined as variables, pointers or indices of a phenomenon (Garcia et al. 2000). Typically, potential indices are grouped into 3 or 4 categories representing: Abundance Early season catch rate, survey counts, commercial fishing area Production Number of recruits, mean size, average maximum size, sex ratio in catches, proportion berried, density of larvae, condition factors, disease Fishing pressure Proportion immature in catch, total trap hauls (per area ground), incidental mortality (discards or other gears), landings alternative species, exploitation rate, proportion females in catch, proportion of catch taken during ovigerous period Ecosystem and environment Predator abundance, prey abundance, temperature indices, wind/current flows

индекс запаса, тыс.т BASIC ELEMENTS Reference points Target and limit (or buffered referents point as the upper border of the confidence interval of limit reference point). Methods of evaluations: 1) Assessment models ; 2) Percentiles of historical trends [Koeller et al., 2011; Буяновский, 2012].; 3) By experts based on subjective considerations. 6 4 2 2 1 0 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 Assessment of reference points by percentiles on the example of the dynamics of the index of blue crab stock in the Primorye subarea, and trends in the stock built over all (1) 5 and the last (2) years. The green line shows the value of the target value defined for 2014.; Red - the value of the limit point, defined for 2014, below which the fishery should be closed. Trend 1 - not meaningful; Trend 2 - significant.

BASIC ELEMENTS Harvest Control Rule (HCR) Traditional The Traffic Light color convention Proposed 4-colors scheme Critical Cautious Healthy Phase of the explosion of abundance E exploitation rate (coefficient): E lim limit; E tg target, E t, 50% - coefficient in prediction year, E t, 5%, E t, 95% - coefficient according to limits of confidence interval; FSB fishable stock biomass, FSB lim limit, FSB tg target, FSB t, 50% - prediction, FSB t, 5%, FSB t, 95% - upper and lower limits of confidence interval; FSB lim-t limit value for excessively increasing stock.

BASIC ELEMENTS Harvest Control Rule (HCR) Proposed 4-colors scheme Dynamics of the abundance of the introduced species during acclimatization Karpevich, 1975) Abundance Receiving capacity of the basin The area of the FSB>K (carrying over-population capacity) Critical Cautious Healthy Phase of the explosion of abundance I II III IV V Phases of acclimatization E exploitation rate (coefficient): E lim limit; E tg target, E t, 50% - coefficient in prediction year, E t, 5%, E t, 95% - coefficient according to limits of confidence interval; FSB fishable stock biomass, FSB lim limit, FSB tg target, FSB t, 50% - prediction, FSB t, 5%, FSB t, 95% - upper and lower limits of confidence interval; FSB lim-t limit value for excessively increasing stock.

BASIC ELEMENTS State of the stock Newly exploited status for stocks which recently exploited for the first time or after longtime fishery closing. Critical Cautious Healthy Prosperous (increasing) stock is above target reference point and clear tendency of growing. In case when we have some negative tendency of very high abundance so called overpopulation, state of the stock is defined as excessively increasing stock. Stable stock is above target reference point and has no clear tendencies in dynamics. Reducing stock is between target and limit reference point with negative dynamics. Recovering stock is between target and limit reference point with positive dynamics. Depressive New exploited Stable Prosperous Phase of the explosion of abundance Depressive stock is under limit reference point. Undefined no useful information concerning exploitation rate and biomass level.

BASIC ELEMENTS Maximum TAC variation achievement of year-to-year stability in TACs; avoid over- and under- estimation of TAC due to high uncertainty in particular year. Value of variation depends on state of the stock and based on biomass fluctuation Year -/+% of TAC ~ -/+% of FSB PERIOD FSB (ktons) 2012 21-2013 24 13 2014 22 9 2015 28 21 Mean 14 Percent change (%) Recommendation: the TAC should not be changed by more than +/- 14% compared with the previous year s TAC.

BASIC ELEMENTS Aims and management plans Yield maximization; Achievement of year-to-year stability ; Stock recovering According to Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment book by Hilborn and Walters (1992)

SOME POINTS FOR CONCLUSION Besides a new approach the paper gives analysis of existing measures and Summarize information concerning crab fisheries over last 10 years. management actions. First global experience to reorganize the management approach in national fisheries policy. Paper can be use as background for complex rebuilding of fisheries management of all crabs. Management plan and other issues should be review every three year. Thank you!