Interaction Testing Report. 24 SF Units with Synteen Geogrids. Stone Strong Systems Lincoln, Nebraska

Similar documents
10,000. Peak Connection Strength, lb/ft 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000

Cornerstone R100 Segmental Retaining Wall Unit and SRW Products SRW5, SRW7, and SRW9 Series Geogrids Connection Strength Testing

Shear Strength Evaluation of the EP Henry Cast Stone Wall System

FINAL REPORT: CONNECTION STRENGTH TESTING TENSAR GEOGRIDS WITHIN MESA STANDARD BLOCKS AND MESA STANDARD CONNECTORS

Section ( ) SPECIFICATION FOR SEGMENTAL CONCRETE UNIT RETAINING WALL

Geosynthetics and Reinforced Soil Structures

LABORATORY TESTING OF MODULAR MASONRY CONCRETE BLOCK GEOGRID FAC- ING CONNECTIONS

MODULAR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL

Section ( ) MODULAR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL

Section ( ) KEYSTONE CONCRETE RETAINING WALL

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS

SECTION ( ) MODULAR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL SYSTEM WEATHERED MULTI SHAPE 8 (203mm) HIGH UNITS

Structural Performance of 8-inch NRG Concrete Masonry Units. Report Compiled for: Niagara Regional Group. Date: January 28, 2013

477 kcmil, 3M Brand Composite Conductor Mechanical Properties, Volume 1 Tensile and Stress-Strain Tests

Influence of Test Method on Direct Shear Behavior of Segmental Retaining Wall Units

Failure Mechanism for Large-Sized Grouted Anchor Bolt under Tensile Load

TIMELESS BEAUTY Experience Old-World Charm on a Grander Scale...

DIVISION: EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS SECTION: RETAINING WALLS SECTION: SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS REPORT HOLDER:

CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 5/8/7)

Buckling Strength Tests of Strongwell s SE28 Fiberglass-Reinforced Polymer Poles

CHAPTER III DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR OF A LABORATORY SPECIMEN

Wmega Retaining Wall Specification

SPECIFICATION FOR CORNERSTONE GEOGRID REINFORCED SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

ICC-ES Evaluation Report Issued July 1, 2011 This report is subject to renewal in one year.

Merrimack and Suwannee ACSS/TW/HS285 Conductor Stress-Strain Tests. Southwire Company

SPECIFICATIONS FOR PRECAST MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL SYSTEM (revised 9/17/18)

4/12/2011. Outline. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction

DIVISION: EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS SECTION: SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS REPORT HOLDER: ANCHOR WALL SYSTEMS EVALUATION SUBJECT:

Stability of a Mechanically Stabilized Earth Wall

SECTION SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL

560 IN SITU TESTING, ANALYSIS, AND RELIABILITY OF FOUNDATIONS. Lateral Load Capacity of Cast-in-Place Shafts behind an MSE Wall. *corresponding author

Research Evaluation of Single Lift Grouting in Concrete Masonry Wall Panels

KEYSTONE KEYSTONE. Century Wall. Century Wall KEYSTONE. Century Wall. Century Wall. TIMELESS BEAUTY Experience Old-World Charm on a Grander Scale...

DIVISION: EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS SECTION: RETAINING WALLS SECTION: SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS REPORT HOLDER:

research report Steel Sheet Sheathing Options for Cold-Formed Steel Framed Shear Wall Assemblies Providing Shear Resistance - Phase 2

Creep testing of AMBEX AAC anchoring capsules

Mega Wall Block Welded Wire Mesh Connection

CYPRESS Stone Geogrid Reinforced Retaining Wall Installation Specification SECTION CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL PART 1 GENERAL

DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR NSWS NATURAL STONE RETAINING AND FREE-STANDING WALL SYSTEMS

NEW COMPOSITE CONSTRUCTION OF HYBRID BEAMS COMBINING STEEL INVERTED T-SECTION AND RC FLANGE

ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California

SLEEVE-IT SD1. Technical Summary

SECTION LIMESTONE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS

Improved Student Understanding of Materials and Structures through Non-Traditional Laboratory Project

APPENDIX B. LOAD FRAME. This Appendix will describe the philosophy in the design and operation of the loading system.

ABC-UTC. Research Progress Report (Feasibility Study) Title: Alternative ABC Connections Utilizing UHPC. March, 2017

Development of a Large-scale Universal Apparatus for Testing Geosynthetic-Soil Systems

TEST REPORT. Rendered to: COLLINS LIMITED, LLC. For:

Originally Issued: 09/30/2011 Revised: 09/15/2017 Valid Through: 09/30/ Design:

EARTH FORCE REDUCTION BY A SYNTHETIC COMPRESSIBLE INCLUSION

SECTION Segmental Concrete Unit Masonry Retaining Wall Height Over 5-0 High

Strength & Versatility

Soil-Structure Interaction (SSI) Testing Facility and Capabilities at Lehigh University

Originally Issued: 09/30/2011 Revised: 09/18/2015 Valid Through: 09/30/2016

Ductile Fiber Reinforced Panels for Seismic Retrofit

Bi-Directional Static Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

Bi-Directional Static Load Testing of Drilled Shafts

Full-Scale Cyclic Bending Test of Strongwell s SE28 FRP Pole

Effects of Pile Driving Through a Full-Height Precast Concrete Panel Faced, Geogrid-Reinforced, Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) Wall

Drop weight testing on sandwich panels with a novel thermoplastic core material

SECTION CONCRETE SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

Wall Modular Block Mechanically Stabilized Earth, Item S.

Testing of the JVI Mid V in 4 Slabs

STEEL REACTION FRAME

Concrete DESIGNS QUARTER 1: 2005 ASLA CPE

AT SYNTEEN OUR PEOPLE KNEW THAT IN ORDER TO OFFER A BETTER GEOGRID WE NEEDED TO MAKE IT OURSELVES.

Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu , China. *Corresponding author

ICBO Evaluation Service, Inc Workman Mill Road, Whittier, California

SECTION SPECIFICATION FOR STONEBRIDGE RETAINING WALL SYSTEM

Construction Procedures

SAMPLE GUIDE SPECIFICATIONS FOR OSTERBERG CELL LOAD TESTING OF DRILLED SHAFTS

SPECIFICATION FOR MAGNUMSTONE GEOGRID REINFORCED Mechanically Stabilized Earth (MSE) SYSTEM

[TECHNICAL REPORT 3] Lateral System Analysis

Section (02830) MODULAR CONCRETE RETAINING WALL

The Speed of Gravity. Gravity retaining walls built with Stone Strong System s Big Block Technology are the most efficient solution on the market.

Description. This work shall consist of furnishing materials and placement of modular block wall constructed in accordance with

Full-Scale Bending Tests of Strongwell s SE28 Fiberglass-Reinforced Polymer Poles

SHEAR OF CONCRETE MASONRY WALLS

TESTING OF RC WALLS USING ADVANCED LOAD-CONTROL AND INSTRUMENTATION METHODS

CYCLIC PERFORMANCE OF RC BEAMS WITH WEB OPENINGS

Best Practices for Design and Construction of MSE Walls

SEISMIC TEST OF CONCRETE BLOCK INFILLED REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMES

Prepared for Forest Product Laboratory, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Norbord Inc., Toronto, Ontario, Canada

GEOSYTHETIC SLOPE SPEC-V0704rev.doc STANDARD SPECIAL PROVISION FOR GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SLOPE CONSTRUCTION

Nafadi, Khalaf Alla, Lucier, Rizkalla, Zia and Klein BEHAVIOR AND DESIGN OF DIRECTLY LOADED LEDGES OF SHORT SPAN L- SHAPED BEAMS

SECTION SEGMENTAL CONCRETE UNIT MASONRY RETAINING WALL MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 5-0 HIGH

Over the last decade, drilled and postgrouted micropile foundations have

Frictional Properties of Non-Metallic Materials for Use in Sliding Bearings: An Experimental Study

CHAPTER 4. 1:6-Scale Frame: Stiffness and Modal Testing 4.1 OVERVIEW

Testing and Evaluation of CFS L-headers

In-plane testing of precast concrete wall panels with grouted sleeve

CHAPTER 5 FRESH AND HARDENED PROPERTIES OF CONCRETE WITH MANUFACTURED SAND

M. C. Yaksh, Ph.D., PE NAC International T. Chung SAIC

In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Performance of the MINI-MC Flange Connector

MACLEAN POWER SYSTEMS

Evaluation of the Orientation of 90 and 180 Reinforcing Bar Hooks in Wide Members

Chapter 2: Strain. Chapter 3: Torsion. Chapter 4: Shear and Moment Diagram

Originally Issued: 04/2015 Valid Through: 04/2016

CYCLIC TESTING OF BOLTED CONTINUOUS I-BEAM-TO-HOLLOW SECTION COLUMN CONNECTIONS

Transcription:

Interaction Testing Report 24 SF Units with Synteen Geogrids Stone Strong Systems Lincoln, Nebraska Prepared for: Stone Strong Systems 1620 South 70th Street Suite 105 Lincoln, Nebraska 68506 September 17, 2004 TG Project No. 02546.2 THIELE GEOTECH, INC 13478 Chandler Road Omaha, Nebraska 68138-3716 402/556-2171 Fax 402/556-7831 www.thielegeotech.com In association with: TADROS ASSOCIATES, LLC 6910 Pacific Street, Suite 204 Omaha, Nebraska 68106-1045

Interaction Testing Report 24 SF Units with Synteen Geogrids Table of Contents INTRODUCTION...1 MATERIALS...2 TEST PROCEDURES...3 TEST FRAME... 3 INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS... 3 CONNECTION STRENGTH PULLOUT TESTS... 4 TEST RESULTS...5 INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS... 5 CONNECTION STRENGTH PULLOUT TESTS... 5 CONCLUSIONS... 6 APPENDIX

Interaction Testing Report September 17, 2004 TG #02546.2 Page 1 INTRODUCTION Thiele Geotech, Inc., in association with Tadros Associates, LLC, has completed an interaction testing program to evaluate the interface shear capacity and the connection strength between Stone Strong Systems 24 SF precast concrete segmental retaining wall blocks and Synteen SF55 and SF110 geogrids used in the construction of segmental retaining walls. The results of the testing program were used to define relationships for surcharge load representing stacked Stone Strong units with facing/geogrid connection strength and with interface shear strength both with and without geogrid inclusions. Due to the large size of the Stone Strong blocks, a custom testing frame was designed by Tadros Associates, LLC. This large test frame accommodates full scale tests under conditions that reproduced field shear and connection conditions. Testing was performed by personnel from Tadros Associates and Thiele Geotech.

Interaction Testing Report September 17, 2004 TG #02546.2 Page 2 MATERIALS Stone Strong Systems 24 SF blocks are precast concrete blocks used for construction of segmental retaining walls. The 24 SF unit has nominal face dimensions of 96 inches long and 36 inches tall for a total face area of 24 square feet. The unit has a depth (measured horizontally from the face to the tail) of approximately 44 inches. The units have a center void between twin webs, and the face and tail flanges extend beyond the webs. The rear flange is tapered to allow the blocks to be laid on a curve. Each unit weighs approximately 5,800 to 6,200 pounds empty, depending on the aggregate used to manufature the block. When installed in a retaining wall, the block voids are filled with aggregate. The infilled weight is approximately 10,200 to 11,000 pounds, depending on the unit weights of the concrete and aggregate fill. Synteen SF55 and SF110 geogrids are uni-directional grids composed of high strength polyester yarns coated with a PVC material. The SF55 and SF110 Geogrids have average ultimate tensile strengths of 3,774 pounds per foot and 10,212 pounds per foot, respectively, based on published test data.

Interaction Testing Report September 17, 2004 TG #02546.2 Page 3 TEST PROCEDURES TEST FRAME The apparatus used to conduct the tests consisted of a steel frame anchored to a rigid concrete mat foundation. The frame is capable of resisting 150,000 pounds of surcharge load and 100,000 pounds of shear/pullout force simultaneously. Rollers were mounted between the test frame and the loading beam to allow for block movement during shear testing. Photographs and schematics of the test frame are included in the Appendix of this report. Surcharge and shear/pullout loads were placed on the blocks using two (2) Enerpac PEJ-1301 submerged hydraulic pumps capable of delivering 20 in 3 per minute at 10,000 psi each. Loads were measured by the use of Omega PX303 pressure transducers with 0 to 10,000 psig range and an accuracy of 0.25 percent FS. Mounted on each pump is a manifold to distribute hydraulic fluid to the two (2) 25 ton, 6 inch stroke (Enerpac RC256) surcharge actuators and the two (2) 25 ton, 6 inch stroke (Enerpac RC256) shear/pullout actuators and to the pressure transducers. The flow of fluid to the shear/pullout actuators is adjustable by an Enerpac V-8F needle valve. Displacements were measured by the use of two (2) 3 inch stroke and one (1) 6 inch stroke linear potentiometers with 0.15 percent maximum linearity (0.07 percent typical) and less than 0.01 mm hysteresis. Loads and displacements were continuously measured and recorded during the test by a Data Translation DT9802 date acquisition module connected to a loptop computer via USB interface. Sensor excitation was provided by an Omega 5v regulated power supply. Loads and displacements were recorded a minimum of once per second using DT Measure Foundry software. INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS The NCMA SRWU-2 and ASTM D6638 methods of test were used to determine the shear strength between Stone Strong Systems 24 SF concrete block units. The tests were carried out with and without a layer of geosynthetic reinforcement between layers of Stone Strong units. The bottom block was installed and braced against the front of the load frame. Portions of the top of the block were recessed with a bush hammer to control the dimension of the loaded area. Crushed limestone infill was placed in the void of the bottom block. When a geogrid layer was included, the geosynthetic reinforcement was centered over the bottom block. The top Stone Strong unit layer was centered over the bottom block. Crushed limestone infill was placed in the void of the top block. The top unit was loaded with a constant vertical surcharge load applied to the concrete webs, simulating an equivalent height of stacked blocks. The shear force was applied at a constant rate of displacement until large shear displacements were achieved. The load and displacements were

Interaction Testing Report September 17, 2004 TG #02546.2 Page 4 continuously measured and recorded during the test by a microcomputer/data acquisition system. The tests were continued until failure of the interface components occurred, causing a sustained loss of shearing resistance, or to a displacement of 1½ inches. CONNECTION STRENGTH PULLOUT TESTS The NCMA SRWU-1 and ASTM D6638 methods of test were used to determine the connection strength between geosynthetic reinforcement and Stone Strong Systems 24 SF concrete block units. The tests were carried out with a layer of geosynthetic reinforcement between layers of Stone Strong units. The bottom block was installed and braced against the back of the load frame. Crushed limestone infill was placed in the voids of the bottom block. The geosynthetic reinforcement was centered over the bottom block and attached to a clamping device. Sacrificial pieces of geogrid were placed over the extended flanges to maintain even load distribution across the block unit. The top Stone Strong unit layer was placed over the geogrid and centered over the bottom block. Crushed limestone infill was placed in the voids of the top block, and the block was braced against the back of the frame. The top unit was loaded with a constant vertical surcharge load applied to the concrete webs, simulating an equivalent height of stacked blocks. A tensile force was placed on the geosynthetic reinforcement under constant rate of displacement until failure of the connection system occurred. The load and displacements were continuously measured and recorded during the test by a microcomputer/data acquisition system. Tests were continued until failure occurred as excessive deformation or slippage of the geogrid in the connection or failure of the blocks occurred, causing a sustained loss of tensile resistance recorded.

Interaction Testing Report September 17, 2004 TG #02546.2 Page 5 TEST RESULTS INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS Results of the interface shear tests are attached in tables and graphs recorded in the Appendix of this report. The peak interface shear capacity and shear capacity at the displacement criterion of ¾ inch were plotted versus the normal load. The minimum peak shear capacity recorded was 2,822 pounds per foot. The peak interface shear strength between Stone Strong Systems 24 SF units and Synteen SF55 and SF110 Geogrid for equivalent wall heights between 9.6 and 57.4 feet high ranged between 8,667 and 12,371 pounds per foot. Tests repeated using the same normal load had peak shear capacity values within 10 percent of the mean peak shear capacity of the identical tests; therefore, they are within the NCMA recommended limits for demonstrating test repeatability. The service state criterion is defined as the load at ¾ inch deflection. Lines were best fit to the test data for the individual tests series. Interface shear properties were interpolated from the data, and are summarized in Table 1. Case Block shear (no geogrid) Shear w/ SF 55 inclusion Shear w/ SF 110 inclusion Minimum Table 1, Interface Shear Properties Ultimate Service State Criterion Friction Friction Maximum Minimum Angle Angle (degrees) (degrees) Maximum 362 35.2 19,000 360 33.0 18,000 2,018 22.5 10,115 1,901 20.5 9,450 1,640 19.2 10,835 1,640 16.6 9,500 CONNECTION STRENGTH PULLOUT TESTS Results of the connection strength tests are summarized in tables and graphs recorded in the Appendix of this report. The peak connection capacity and connection capacity at the displacement criterion of ¾ inch were plotted versus the normal load. The minimum peak connection capacity recorded was 2,268 pounds per foot. The recorded peak connection strengths between Stone Strong Systems 24 SF units and Synteen SF55 and SF110 Geogrid were 2,847 and 6,198 pounds per foot, respectively, for equivalent wall heights between 4.8 and 28.7 feet high. Tests repeated using the same normal load had peak shear capacity values within 10 percent of the mean peak shear capacity of the identical tests; therefore, they are within the NCMA recommended limits for demonstrating test repeatability.

Interaction Testing Report September 17, 2004 TG #02546.2 Page 6 Lines were best fit to the test data for the individual tests series. Interface shear properties were interpolated from the data, and are summarized in Table 2. Case Connection Strength w/ SF 55 inclusion Connection Strength w/ SF 110 inclusion Table 2, Connection Strength Properties Minimum Ultimate Friction Angle (degrees) Maximum Minimum Service State Criterion Friction Angle (degrees) Maximum 1,555 16.6 3,090 806 15.0 2,822 2,233 24.3 6,126 1,624 22.4 4,065 CONCLUSIONS The design curves illustrated on the graphs in the appendix are based on interpretation of the test data, based on the NCMA Segmental Retaining Wall Design Manual. The design curves are controlled by the ¾ inch displacement criterion. The design values taken from the graphs should be used with caution, as shear and connection strengths may vary based on actual site conditions and construction quality. Respectfully submitted, Thiele Geotech, Inc. Daniel J. Thiele, P.E. P:\02546.2\REPORT - 24 SF WITH SYNTEEN.DOC

Interaction Testing Report September 17, 2004 TG #02546.2 Appendix APPENDIX Test Setup Photographs Interface Shear Test Results SF55 Pullout Results SF55 Interface Shear Results SF110 Pullout Results SF110 Interface Shear Results Aggregate Test Reports

PHOTO NUMBER 1 Test Frame Setup

PHOTO NUMBER 2 Geogrid Pullout System PHOTO NUMBER 3 Pullout Test Setup

INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS 24 SF UNITS Trial # Normal Approx Wall Height (ft) Approx # of Units Shear @ 3/4" displacement Peak Shear 1 4,500 9.6 3.2 3,212 3,616 2 4,500 9.6 3.2 3,464 3,842 3 7,000 14.9 5.0 6,185 6,286 4 9,500 20.2 6.7 6,992 7,344 5 9,500 20.2 6.7 7,155 7,496 6 9,500 20.2 6.7 6,249 6,349 7 9,500 20.2 6.7 5,971 6,551 8 12,000 25.5 8.5 7,206 8,050 9 17,000 36.2 12.1 10,935 12,371 10 22,000 46.8 15.6 13,505 14,084 11 27,000 57.4 19.1 19,149 21,013 14,000 INTERFACE SHEAR STRENGTH vs. NORMAL LOAD 12,000 y = tan 35.2 + 362 10,000 y = tan 33.0 + 360 Shear Strength 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 Normal Surcharge Load

GEOGRID PULLOUT TESTS 24 SF UNITS w/ SYNTEEN SF55 GEOGRID Trial # Normal Approx Wall Height (ft) Approx # of Units Tension @ 3/4" displ Peak Tension 1 2,250 4.8 1.6 1,487 2,268 2 4,750 10.1 3.4 2,041 3,049 3 4,750 10.1 3.4 1,915 2,797 4 4,750 10.1 3.4 2,066 2,923 5 6,000 12.8 4.3 2,570 3,427 6 7,250 15.4 5.1 2,771 3,099 7 8,500 18.1 6.0 2,822 3,124 8 11,000 23.4 7.8 0* 3,049 9 13,500 28.7 9.6 0* 2,847 * - geogrid ruptured before reaching 3/4" displacement 7,000 CONNECTION STRENGTH vs. NORMAL LOAD 6,000 5,000 Connection Strength 4,000 3,000 y = tan 16.6 + 1555 y = 3090 y = 2822 2,000 y = 15.0 + 806 1,000 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 Normal Surcharge Load

INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS 24 SF UNITS w/ SYNTEEN SF55 INCLUSION Trial # Normal Approx Wall Height (ft) Approx # of Units Shear @ 3/4" displacement Peak Shear 1 4,500 9.6 3.2 3,779 4,082 2 7,000 14.9 5.0 4,938 5,518 3 9,500 20.2 6.7 4,586 4,686 4 9,500 20.2 6.7 5,619 5,820 5 9,500 20.2 6.7 4,586 5,039 6 17,000 36.2 12.1 10,255 11,968 7 22,000 46.8 15.6 9,096 9,499 8 27,000 57.4 19.1 8,063 8,667 9 27,000 57.4 19.1 10,834 11,565 14,000 INTERFACE SHEAR STRENGTH vs. NORMAL LOAD 12,000 10,000 y = 10115 Shear Strength 8,000 6,000 y = tan 22.4 + 2018 y = tan 20.5 + 1901 y = 9450 4,000 2,000 0 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 Normal Surcharge Load

GEOGRID PULLOUT TESTS 24 SF UNITS w/ SYNTEEN SF110 GEOGRID Trial # Normal Approx Wall Height (ft) Approx # of Units Tension @ 3/4" displ Peak Tension 1 2,250 4.8 1.6 2,242 2,822 2 2,250 4.8 1.6 2,771 3,805 3 3,500 7.4 2.5 3,301 3,930 4 6,000 12.8 4.3 4,308 4,787 5 6,000 12.8 4.3 3,830 4,737 6 6,000 12.8 4.3 3,779 4,510 7 7,250 15.4 5.1 4,787 5,971 8 8,500 18.1 6.0 5,140 6,148 9 11,000 23.4 7.8 4,107 6,022 10 13,500 28.7 9.6 4,031 6,198 7,000 CONNECTION STRENGTH vs. NORMAL LOAD y = 6126 6,000 y = tan 24.3 + 2233 5,000 Connection Strength 4,000 3,000 y = tan 22.4 + 1624 y = 4065 2,000 1,000 0 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 Normal Surcharge Load

INTERFACE SHEAR TESTS 24 SF UNITS w/ SF110 INCLUSION Trial # Normal Approx Wall Height (ft) Approx # of Units Shear @ 3/4" displacement Peak Shear 1 4,500 9.6 3.2 2,444 2,822 2 7,000 14.9 5.0 3,250 3,754 3 9,500 20.2 6.7 5,392 5,619 4 9,500 20.2 6.7 4,913 5,089 5 9,500 20.2 6.7 4,888 5,064 6 12,000 25.5 8.5 5,089 5,719 7 14,500 30.9 10.3 5,795 6,652 8 17,000 36.2 12.1 5,820 7,407 9 19,500 41.5 13.8 7,886 8,844 10 22,000 46.8 15.6 8,516 9,171 11 27,000 57.4 19.1 9,499 10,834 14,000 INTERFACE SHEAR vs. NORMAL FORCE 12,000 y = tan 19.2 + 1640 10,000 Shear Strength 8,000 6,000 y = tan 16.6 + 1640 4,000 2,000 0 0 4000 8000 12000 16000 20000 24000 28000 Normal Surcharge Load

Project Location THIELE GEOTECH, INC AGGREGATE REPORT Job No. Stone Strong Systems 02546.0 Date Lincoln, NE 7/31/03 US Standard Cumulative Percent Specification Percent Sieve No. Retained Passing Retained Passing 1 1/2" 0.3 99.7 3/4" 39.4 60.6 0 to 40 60 to 100 3/8" 96.3 3.7 # 4 96.9 3.1 60 to 100 0 to 40 # 10 97.1 2.9 # 20 97.3 2.7 # 40 97.5 2.5 # 100 97.9 2.1 # 200 98.2 1.8 95 to 100 0 to 5 Sample of Sampled at Limestone Unit Fill Workman Precast from stockpile Source Date Received 7/22/03 Remarks Dry Unit Weight by Rodding ASTM C29 90.5 pcf Lab No.

Project Location THIELE GEOTECH, INC AGGREGATE REPORT Job No. Stone Strong Systems 02546.0 Date Lincoln, NE 8/6/03 US Standard Cumulative Percent Specification Percent Sieve No. Retained Passing Retained Passing 1 1/2" 0.0 100.0 3/4" 33.9 66.1 0 to 40 60 to 100 3/8" 95.5 4.5 # 4 96.4 3.6 60 to 100 0 to 40 # 10 96.6 3.4 # 20 96.8 3.2 # 40 96.9 3.1 # 100 97.3 2.7 # 200 97.5 2.5 95 to 100 0 to 5 Sample of Sampled at Limestone Unit Fill Workman Precast from stockpile Source Date Received Remarks Sample #2 Lab No.

Project Location THIELE GEOTECH, INC AGGREGATE REPORT Job No. Stone Strong Systems 02546.0 Date Lincoln, NE 3/11/04 US Standard Cumulative Percent Specification Percent Sieve No. Retained Passing Retained Passing 1 1/2" 0.0 100.0 3/4" 33.9 66.1 0 to 40 60 to 100 3/8" 95.5 4.5 # 4 96.4 3.6 60 to 100 0 to 40 # 10 96.6 3.4 # 20 96.8 3.2 # 40 96.9 3.1 # 100 97.3 2.7 # 200 97.5 2.5 95 to 100 0 to 5 Sample of Sampled at Limestone Unit Fill Workman Precast from stockpile Source Date Received Remarks Sample #3 Lab No.

Project Location THIELE GEOTECH, INC AGGREGATE REPORT Job No. Stone Strong Systems 02546.0 Date Lincoln, NE 6/1/04 US Standard Cumulative Percent Specification Percent Sieve No. Retained Passing Retained Passing 1 1/2" 0.0 100.0 3/4" 5.4 94.6 0 to 40 60 to 100 3/8" 44.9 55.1 # 4 81.3 18.7 60 to 100 0 to 40 # 10 89.4 10.6 # 20 92.1 7.9 # 40 93.3 6.7 # 100 94.4 5.6 # 200 94.9 5.1 95 to 100 0 to 5 Sample of Sampled at Limestone Unit Fill Workman Precast from stockpile Source Date Received 5/25/04 Remarks Sample #4 Lab No. G825