THE IN VITRO USE OF OLIVE EXPLANTS IN SCREENING TRIALS FOR RESISTANCE TO THE ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA ABSTRACT RESUMEN

Similar documents
Pathogenicity of Four Species of Meloidogyne on Three Varieties of Olive Trees

Meloidogyne spp. Gall Index and Egg Mass Number in Cucumber and Horned Cucumber 1

RESEARCH NOTES. Penetration, Development, Reproduction, and Sex Ratio of Meloidogyne javanica in Three Carrot CuItivars 1

EFFECT OF VARIOUS INITIAL POPULATION DENSITIES OF TWO SPECIES OF MELOIDOGYNE ON GROWTH OF TOMATO AND CUCUMBER IN GREENHOUSE

2 5 AVW. 191T'fj. D. P. TAYLOR 1) : Histopdthology of Meloidogyne-indzzced gdh on the stems of roselle, Hibiscus sabdariffa.

Effect of Foliar Application of Carbofuran and a Related Compound on Plant-parasitic Nematodes under Greenhouse and Growth Chamber Conditions

Study on Pathogenicity Test of Meloidogyne incognita on Different Vegetable Crops

A (ng) Protocol. Phenol: 87.1 Kit: 37.7 SPION: Phenol: 23.8 Kit: 14.7 SPION: 6.46

RESEARCH/INVESTIGACIÓN EVALUATION OF COWPEA (VIGNA UNGUICULATA L.) GERMPLASM FOR THE SOURCE OF RESISTANCE TO ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA

SALT SUPPRESSION OF MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON TOMATO

Nematicidal Activity of Lantana Camara L. for Control of Root-Knot Nematodes

INFLUENCE OF BRICK-KILN DUST ON PENETRATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA IN EGGPLANT ROOTS AND ITS IMPACT ON PLANT GROWTH AND YIELD

FIELD ASSESSMENT OF THE NEMATICIDAL PROPERTIES OF NEEM ( AZADIRACHTA INDICA

Journal of Phytopathology and Pest Management

Susceptibility of Different Tomato Cultivars Against Rootknot Nematode, Meloidogyne spp.

Host-Parasite Relationships in Root-Knot Disease of White Mulberry

EFFECT OF FLY ASH ON GROWTH, YIELD AND ROOT-KNOT DISEASE OF SOYBEAN

Meloidogyne mayaguensis reproduction on resistant tomato and pepper. Abstract

Virulence of root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp., on tomato bearing the Mi gene for resistance

REPRODUCTION OF NATURAL AND SELECTED RESISTANCE-BREAKING MELOIDOGYNE POPULATIONS ON NEAR-ISOGENIC TOMATO LINES

Protylenchus penetrons as Influenced by Seedling Age at Inoculation

Control of Nematodes in Tomato with Paecilomyces lilacinus Strain 251

PENETRATION, DEVELOPMENT AND HISTOPATHOLOGY OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODES IN TOMATO «NTDR-l»(1) by Y. D. NARAYANA and D. D. R. REDDY

ROOT KNOT NEMATODE REPRODUCTION AND GALLING SEVERITY ON THIRTEEN VEGETABLE CROPS

Colored Mulches Affect Yield of Fresh-market Tomato Infected with Meloidogyne incognita

Effect of Temperature on Suppression of Meloidogyne incognita by Tagetes Cultivars 1

Dynamics of the Nuclear Complement of Giant Cells Induced by Meloidogyne incognita

Plant parasitic nematodes associated with banana crop in Crete, Greece

Effect of Yard Waste Compost on Crop Tolerance to Root-knot Nematodes

INTRODUCTION. Root-knot nematodes (Meloido^yne species), due to their. world-wide distribution, exceedingly wide host range and

EFFECT OF NEEM-BASED PRODUCTS ON THE ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA, AND GROWTH OF TOMATO

Reproductive fitness of Meloidogyne artiellia populations on chickpea and durum wheat

A SPECIES-SPECIFIC DNA PROBE FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF MELOIDOGYNE HAPLA ABSTRACT

Crop Rotation and Nematicides for Management of Mixed Populations of Meloidogyne spp. on Tobacco 1

Effect of Temperature on Suppression. by Tagetes Cultivars

Meloidogyne incognita Race 1 and M. javanica 1

Effects of Soil Temperature and Planting Date of Wheat on Meloidogyne incognita Reproduction, Soil Populations, and Grain Yield

Meloidogyne incognita on Bean 1

Mass Production of Gummy Stem Blight Spores for Resistance Screening

W. Pang, S. L. Hafez,* and P. Sundararaj

Greenhouse Studies on the Effect of Marigolds (Tagetes spp.) on Four Root-knot Nematode Species (Meliodogyne spp.)

SEM studies on the Mediterranean olive root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne baetica, and histopathology on two additional natural hosts

Pathogenicity of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)

EFFICACY OF PESTICIDES, NEEM SEED POWDER AND BIO-CONTROL AGENTS ON MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA AND GROWTH AND OIL YIELD OF MENTHA ARVENSIS

Effect of Plant Mineral Nutrition on Tomato Plant Infected with Meloidogyne Incognita Under Greenhouse Conditions

Meloidogyne incognita Race 3 in High-Yielding Breeding Lines of Upland Cotton 1

Management of Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne Spp) on Tomato using Antagonistic Plants

Population Development of Pasteuria penetrans on Meloidogyne arenaria 1

RESPONSE OF SOME TOMATO CULTIVARS AGAINST ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, Meloidogyne incognita (KOFOID & WHITE) CHITWOOD ABSTRACT

Effects of organic manure types on the growth, yield as well as root and soil populations of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne incognita) of tomato

Studies on Pathogenicity of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on Turmeric

A. W. JOHNSON AND R. H. LITTRELL 2

Performance of cucumber varieties in soil infested with root-knot and reniform nematodes 1

Evaluation of Twenty Seven Sugar Beet Genotypes for Resistant to Root- Knot Nematode, (Meloidogyne Javanica)

SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS IN RUBUS CAESIUS L. SUSPENSION CULTURES SMARANDA VÂNTU * Introduction

Received: 13 th Oct-2011 Revised: 16 th Oct-2012 Accepted: 29 th Oct-2012 Research article

Survey and Identification of Root-Knot Nematodes Associated with Brinjal Crops in Fatehabad, Agra

Technical improvement of a new bioreactor for large scale micropropagation of several Vaccinium cultivars

Screening of Tomato Genotypes for Root Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne incognita Kofoid and White Chitwood)

Effects of Pseudomonas fluorescens and fertilizers on the reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita and growth of tomato

Weed Species Not Impaired by Verticillium dahliae and Meloidogyne incognita Relationships that Damage Chile Pepper

Resistance to Meloidogyne spp. in AIIohexaploid Wheat Derived from Triticum turgidum and Aegilops squarrosa 1

I- Tissue Culture Lab

ABSTRACT. held at temperatures of 35 C or The occurred as a surface contaminant on harvested roots; it increased in incidence

INCIDENCE AND INFLUENCE OF PLANT-PARASITIC NEMATODES IN SOUTHERN ILLINOIS PEACH ORCHARDS ABSTRACT

Effects of Soil Textures on Infectivity of Root-Knot Nematodes on Carrot

NEMATODES OF ALFALFA AND THEIR MANAGEMENT. Saad L. Hafez and P. Sundararaj 1 ABSTRACT

Assessment of Yield Loss of Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) due to Root Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne incognita under Field Conditions

The Role of Cover Crops with Biofumigation Potential for the Suppression of Plant-Parasitic Nematodes in Vineyards

Status of Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne hapla Infection on Carrot at Kodaikanal Hills of Tamil Nadu, India and Its Yield Loss Estimation

Population Dynamics of the Root-knot Nematodes Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood and M. javanica (Treub)

EFFECTS OF FURFURAL ON NEMATODE POPULATIONS AND GALLING ON TOMATO AND PEPPER ABSTRACT

RESEARCH/INVESTIGACIÓN EVALUATION OF EDIBLE GINGER AND TURMERIC CULTIVARS FOR ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE RESISTANCE

Preliminary Evaluation of the Encapsulation Technology Used for Local Fruit Trees Germplasm Safeguarding

Osvaldo Pelinganga 1 & Phatu Mashela 1

Influence of Low Temperature on Rate of Development of Meloidogyne incognita and M. hapla '~

Keywords: common mallow, light intensity, somatic embryogenesis, Malva sylvestris

Management of Meloidogyne incognita in Mungbean by Seed Soaking in Different Chemicals under Pot Condition

Integrated Pest Management Package on protected crops

Meloidogyne incognita and Rotylenchulus reniformis and Associated Soil Textures from Some Cotton Production Areas of Texas 1

Journal of Plant Pathology (2007), 89 (2), Edizioni ETS Pisa,

A Comparison of Techniques Useful for Preparing Nematodes for Scanning Electron Microscopy 1

Technical Working Party for Vegetables. Fifty-Second Session Beijing, China, September 17 to 21, 2018 NEW ISSUES ARISING FOR DUS EXAMINATION

COMPOSTED MUNICIPAL WASTE AS A SUBSTITUTE TO FURADAN IN THE MANAGEMENT OF Meloidogyne

Redacted for privacy Dr. Harold J. Jensen

In Vitro Microtuberization of Potato (Solanum Tuberosum L.) Cultivar through Sucrose and Growth Regulator

Yield responses of 12 okra cultivars to southern root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita)

CALIFORNIA ICEBERG LETTUCE RESEARCH PROGRAM. April 1, March 31, 2010

NEMATODE POPULATIONS ON ROUNDUP-READY COTTON IN FLORIDA

Host status of progenies of yellow passion fruit to Meloidogyne incognita race 2

Effect of Different Fungal Filterates on Egg Masses of Meloidogyne Incognita under Laboratory Condition

EFFECTS OF NEEM FORMULATIONS APPLIED AS SOIL DRENCHING ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE MELOIDOGYNE JAVANICA ON ROOTS OF TOMATO

DIMETHYL DISULFIDE- A POTENTIAL BIOPESTICIDE AGAINST ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE OF TOMATO (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) Abstract

Meloidogyne spp. with Isoelectric Focusing 1

Producing potato microtubers under the effect of food colorant

Selection of Dwarfing Rootstocks of Avocado (Persea americana Mill.)

NOTAS DE INVESTIGATION/RESEARCH NOTES COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT CHISEL TYPES FOR 1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE FUMIGATION IN DEEP SANDY SOILS RESUMEN

A New Root-Knot Nematode, Meloidogyne baetica n. sp. (Nematoda: Heteroderidae), Parasitizing Wild Olive in Southern Spain

Ohio Vegetable & Small Fruit Research & Development Program

Genetic and Molecular Characterization of Host-Plant Resistance to Root-knot Nematodes and Fusarium Wilt in Cotton

Transcription:

THE IN VITRO USE OF OLIVE EXPLANTS IN SCREENING TRIALS FOR RESISTANCE TO THE ROOT-KNOT NEMATODE, MELOIDOGYNE INCOGNITA N. Sasanelli, 1 T. D Addabbo, 1 P. Dell Orco, 2 and M. Mencuccini 2 Istituto di Nematologia Agraria, C.N.R., Bari, 1 and Istituto di Ricerche sulla Olivicoltura, C.N.R., Perugia, 2 Italy. nemans13@area.ba.cnr.it. ABSTRACT Sasanelli, N., T. D Addabbo, P. Dell Orco, and M. Mencuccini. 2000. The in vitro use of olive explants in screening trials for resistance to the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Nematropica 30:101-106. In vitro explants of a rootstock and two cultivars of olive were used in a screening trial for resistance to Meloidogyne incognita. All plants were susceptible to the root-knot nematode independently of the inoculum used, egg masses or eggs. The in vitro technique allowed the completion of the screening test in only four months and avoided the seasonality problems that occur by using olive cuttings. Key words: in vitro screening for resistance, Meloidogyne incognita, Olea europaea Ascolana and Moraiolo, wild-olive tree. RESUMEN Sasanelli, N., T. D Addabbo, P. Dell Orco y M. Mencuccini. 2000. Evaluación de resistencia al nematodo agallador M. incognita a través de cultivo in vitro del olivo. Nematrópica 30:101-106. Dos variedades cultivadas como injecto y una como patrón fueron cultivadas in vitro para evaluar resistencia a M. incognita. Todas los plantas resultaron susceptibles al nematodo agallador independientemente del inoculum usado, masas de huevos o huevos. El cultivo in vitro permitió llevar a cabo la prueba en solo cuatro meses, además evitó los problemas estacionales propios de plantas propagadas por estacas. Palabras claves: Evaluación de resistencia in vitro, Meloidogyne incognita, Olea europaea Ascolana y Moraiolo, olivo silvestre. INTRODUCTION The root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica, were reported to be highly pathogenic to several olive cultivars (Lamberti and Baines, 1969; Inserra et al., 1981). Use of resistant olive cultivars or rootstocks can be a desirable and effective alternative to chemicals for control of these phythoparasitic nematodes. The evaluation of large numbers of plant cultivars for reaction to nematodes would be facilitated by a screening method that is reliable, inexpensive and rapid. Previous screenings of olive cultivars for resistance to Meloidogyne spp. were conducted by growing rooted woody cuttings in rootknot nematode infested soil (Sasanelli et al., 1997). This technique, although effective, involves repeated tests with single nematode populations, many plant replications (Esmenjaud et al., 1994) and requires at least one year to complete a single screening test. In vitro techniques are widely used in different areas of bioscience and agriculture (Maramorosch and Hirumi, 1979) and can be usefully applied in plant nematology (Krusberg and Babineau, 1979). 101

102 NEMATROPICA Vol. 30, No. 1, 2000 Use of in vitro olive explants would provide a useful tool to reduce the duration of the screening of olive germplasm for resistance to root-knot nematodes. Selections from wild-olive trees are commonly used as rootstocks in the olive industry. Some improved olive cultivars are rooted directly and grown without rootstock. Therefore, a preliminary experiment was conducted on in vitro explants of a selection of wild olive and two cultivars of olive to explore the suitability of this in vitro method for use in programs to screen for resistance to these nematodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Rooted explants of two improved olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars, Ascolana and Moraiolo, and a selection of the wild-olive tree, DA 12 I, were used in this experiment. These two olive cultivars and the rootstock were selected because they are widely adopted in the Italian olive industry. The explants were collected from shoots established in vitro on OMM medium (Mencuccini et al., 1997) under white fluorescent light at 40 mem -2 s -1, 16 h photoperiod, in a growth chamber at 23 ± 1 C. Sub-apical three-nodal explants (3-4 cm) were used for the rooting in Magenta GA7 vessels with 70 ml basal medium MS/2 (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) plus 2 mg/l NAA (1-Naphthaleneacetic acid), 2% sucrose and 0.8% agar. The ph was adjusted to 5.5 before autoclaving the medium at 121 C for 15 minutes. To avoid the negative effect of light on rooting, the basal part of the vessels was darkened by painting them externally in black and covering the surface of the medium with black sterile polycarbonate granules (Rugini et al., 1988). Vessels, each containing 5 explants, were maintained in a growth chamber at 23 ± 1 C. An Italian population of Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid and White) Chitwood, race 1 (Taylor and Sasser, 1978), was collected from sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) at Castellaneta (Taranto province, Apulia), and reared on tomato cv. Rutgers for two months in a glasshouse at 25 ± 2 C. Explants took 40 days to become rooted. Sterile rootknot nematode eggs or egg masses were then applied to determine their infection potential on the rooted explants. Before inoculation, egg masses were picked from infected tomato roots and directly immersed in a 1:10 dilution mycostatic-bactericidal solution (5 mg of anphothericin B + 100 mg of streptomycin sulphate/100 ml sterile water) for sterilization. The egg masses were thoroughly rinsed with sterile water and stirred at low speed on a magnetic stirrer in an anphothericin-streptomycin solution for 1 h, rinsed again in sterile water, then immersed in 1% chlorhexidine diacetate for 15 min, and finally rinsed three times in sterile water (Molinari and Miacola, 1997). To obtain sterile egg inocula, infected tomato roots were processed by the sodium hypochlorite method (Hussey and Barker, 1973). Eggs were then collected on 5 mm sieve and rinsed in sterile water. For each cultivar or rootstock, four vessels (20 rooted explants) were infected by placing two egg masses (300 eggs/mass) near the roots of each plant. Four more vessels were inoculated by injecting 2 ml of a water suspension of eggs (1 500 eggs/ml, corresponding to 300 viable eggs/ml) near the roots of each plant, using a sterile syringe. Sterilization and inoculation were conducted in a laminar flow hood. After inoculation all vessels were transferred to a growth chamber at 23 ± 1 C. Two months later, plants were uprooted from the growth substrate. Roots of each plant were rinsed in water to remove gel residue, weighed, and the degree of nematode infection was evaluated by counting the number of galls per plant caused by the nematode. Nematode population den-

NEMATROPICA Vol. 30, No. 1, 2000 103 sity was also determined by cutting the roots into small pieces and comminuting them in a blender 3 times for 20 sec. at 8 000 rpm in a 1% aqueous solution of sodium hypochlorite (Hussey and Barker, 1973; Marull and Pinochet, 1991). Nematodes were extracted and collected by differential wet sieving (250 and 5 mm-pore sieves), and eggs, juveniles and females counted. Data were subjected to analysis of variance and means were compared by Duncan s multiple range test. Histological observations were made on the roots of DA 12 I in order to determine the parasitic habits of the nematode on the explants. Infested explant root segments were fixed in aqueous solution of FFA, dehydrated in a tertiary butyl alcohol series and embedded in paraffin. Root sections 10-12 mm thick were stained with safranin and fast-green, mounted in Dammar balsam (Johansen, 1940) and examined with the aid of a compound microscope. Fig. 1. In vitro olive plant (cv. Ascolana) infested with Meloidogyne incognita. Table 1. Reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on in vitro explant roots of two olive cultivars (Ascolana and Moraiolo) and one rootstock (DA 12 I). Parameters Inoculum DA 12 I y Ascolana y Moraiolo y Root weight (g) Eggs 1.1 a z A 1.2 a A 1.2 a A Egg masses 0.6 a A 1.4 ab AB 1.8 b B Galls/ g root Eggs 11.4 a A 1.6 b B 1.1 b B Egg masses 14.6 a A 4.3 b B 2.5 b B Females/g root Eggs 11.0 a A 26.5 ab A 32.8 b A Egg masses 79.5 a A 36.0 ab A 31.4 b A Juveniles/g root Eggs 216.4 a A 30.7 b B 20.8 b B Egg masses 373.0 a A 116.4 b A 22.4 b A Eggs/g root Eggs 220.1 a A 31.1 b B 9.1 b B Egg masses 454.0 a A 64.0 b B 20.9 b B Total population/g root Eggs 436.5 a A 61.7 b B 29.9 b B Egg masses 827.0 a A 180.4 b B 43.3 b B y Each value is an average of ten replicates. z Data followed by the same letters in any row are not statistically different according to Duncan s Multiple Range Test (small letters for P = 0.05; capital letters for P = 0.01).

104 NEMATROPICA Vol. 30, No. 1, 2000 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Explants rooted within 40 days with an average of 4.2 roots per explant and an average root length of 23.8 mm. All plants in the vessels were infected. Meloidogyne incognita galls, females, juveniles and eggs were found on or inside the roots of both cultivars and the wild rootstock (Table 1; Fig. 1). Final nematode populations were significantly higher on DA 12 I compared to Ascolana and Moraiolo, but did not differ between the two cultivars. No significant differences were observed in the number of galls or nematodes within roots of the rooted explants inoculated with the two inoculum sources, although nematode numbers were always higher on roots inoculated with egg masses. Transverse sections of root galls showed that nematode feeding stimulated the formation of several (3-5) large giant cells around the cephalic region. Giant cells were always in the vascular cylinder of the root (Fig. 2). The granulated cytoplasm of the giant cells appeared dense and homogenous, containing numerous hypertrophied nuclei. Abnormal and interrupted xylem elements as well as direct injury of xylem and parenchyma were observed in many sections. These anatomical alterations did not differ from those reported on olive roots under field conditions (Inserra et al., 1981). Susceptibility of DA 12 I and Ascolana to M. incognita observed in our study confirms previous findings by Lamberti and Baines (1969) and Sasanelli et al. (1997). Fig. 2. Anatomical changes induced by Meloidogyne incognita in roots of in vitro olive plant (cv. Ascolana). Cross section (1) of a gall showing expanded giant cells (g) surrounding the nematode head (n) and adjacent xylem elements (x). Inset picture (2) shows the cross section of a non infected root.

NEMATROPICA Vol. 30, No. 1, 2000 105 However, no previous information was available on the reaction of Moraiolo to this root-knot nematode. The in vitro technique that we used reduced the duration of the screening test to 4 months, about ⅓ of the time of in vivo trials. It also avoided seasonal rooting problems, which occur with olive cuttings. Moreover, it overcame the low rooting capacity reported for the olive cultivars Ascolana and Moraiolo (Fontanazza, 1993), as in vitro explants rooted in 40 days. Nevertheless, there may be limitations to this method. The presence of growth hormones could effect plant response to root-knot nematode attack and should be evaluated before tissue culture can be used as a routine technique in resistance screening trials. Auxins and cytokinins have been found to increase susceptibility or to break resistance to root-knot nematode in tomato and peach cultivars (Kochba and Samish, 1971; Sawhney and Webster, 1975). There may also be resistance mechanisms associated with infected older tissues that are not detected by this method. In conclusion, the in vitro test has proved to be a valid alternative to the traditional resistance screening trials for olive. Either eggs or egg masses may be used as inoculum. Eggs can be easily sterilized; however, a large proportion of them may be damaged by the sterilizing agents. Egg masses are difficult to sterilize and may cause contamination of vessels in a percentage larger than that caused by use of egg suspensions. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors wish to thank Dr. Nicola Vovlas for providing photos and Mr. Alfonso Orefice for excellent technical assistance. LITERATURE CITED ESMENJAUD, D., J. C. MINOT, R. VOISIN, J. PIN- OCHET, and G. SALESSES. 1994. Inter and intraspecific variability in plum, peach and peachalmond rootstocks using 22 root-knot nematode populations. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 119:94-100. FONTANAZZA, G. 1993. Olivicoltura intensiva meccanizzata. Edagricole, Bologna, Italy. HUSSEY, R. S., and K. R. BARKER. 1973. A comparison of methods of collecting inocula of Meloidogyne spp., including a new tecnique. Plant Disease Reporter 57:1025-1028. INSERRA, R. N., N. VOVLAS, G. FONTANAZZA, and G. LA CASTA. 1981. Comportamento di alcune cultivar di olivo alle infestazioni di quattro specie di nematodi. Rivista Ortoflorofrutticoltura Italiana 65:143-148. JOHANSEN, D. A. 1940. Plant Microtechnique. MacGraw Hill, New York, U.S.A. KOCHBA, J., and R. M. SAMISH. 1971. Effect of kinetin and 1-napthylacetic acid on root knot nematodes in resistant and susceptible peach root stocks. Journal of the American Society of Horticoltural Science 96:458-461. KRUSBERG, L. R., and D.E. BABINEAU. 1979. Application of plant tissue culture to plant nematology. Pp. 401-419 in W. R. Sharp et al., eds. Plant Cell and Tissue Culture: Principles and Applications. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, OH, U.S.A. LAMBERTI, F., and R.C. BAINES. 1969. Pathogenicity of four species of Meloidogyne on three varieties of olive trees. Journal of Nematology 1:111-115. MARAMOROSCH, K., and H. HIRUMI. 1979. Preface. Pp. XI-XIII in K. Maramorosch, and H. Hirumi, eds. Practical Tissue Culture Applications. Academic Press, New York, NY, U.S.A. MARULL, J., and J. PINOCHET. 1991. Host suitability of Prunus rootstock to four Meloidogyne species and Pratylenchus vulnus in Spain. Nematropica 21:185-195. MENCUCCINI, M., M. MICHELI, and A. STANDAR- DI. 1997. Micropropagazione dell olivo: effetto di alcune citochinine sulla proliferazione. Italus Hortus Vol. 4 (7):32-37. MOLINARI, S., and C. MIACOLA. 1997. Interactions between resistant tomato cvs and Meloidogyne spp. in vitro. Nematologia mediterranea 25:63-71. MURASHIGE, T., and F. SKOOG. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiology 15:473-497. RUGINI, E., A. BAZZOFFIA, and A. JACOBONI. 1988. A simple in vitro method to avoid the initial dark period and to increase rooting in fruit trees. Acta Horticolturae 227:438-440. SASANELLI, N., G. FONTANAZZA, F. LAMBERTI, T. D ADDABBO, M. PATUMI, and G. VERGARI. 1997. Reaction of olive cultivars to Meloidogyne species. Nematologia mediterranea 25:183-190.

106 NEMATROPICA Vol. 30, No. 1, 2000 SAWHNEY, R., and J. M. WEBSTER. 1975. The role of plant growth hormones in determining the resistance of tomato plants to the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita. Nematologica 21:95-103. TAYLOR, A. L., and J. N. SASSER. 1978. Biology, Identification and Control of Root-Knot Nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.). North Carolina State University Graphics, Raleigh, NC, U.S.A. Received: Recibido: 10.III.2000 Accepted for publication: Aceptado para publicación: 10.IV.2000