Case Study : Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Majuba Update. Mark van der Riet Corporate Consultant Eskom Holdings Ltd South Africa

Similar documents
Majuba Underground Coal Gasification

ESKOM S UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION PROJECT. Eskom s Clean Coal Programme

Eskom UCG Strategic Intent

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG)

Underground Coal Gasification: A viable unconventional gas technology

Underground coal gasification Gordon Couch

COAL GASIFICATION. By Prem Sawhney. Meeting of Indo-US Working Group on Coal. April, 2006

Underground Coal Gasification as a Clean Indigenous Energy Option

Update on CCS Project in the Tees Valley.

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG)

Powder River Basin Underground Coal Gasification WY EORI CO2 Conference June 23-24, 2009

Underground Coal Gasification Technology Overview and UK Initiatives

The means of future energy production in Scotland must meet the following criteria:

Mitigating carbon penalties clean coal technologies and carbon dioxide capture and storage

China CCUS Developments and Perspective

Riverside Energy Ltd

R&D needs for future clean utilisation of coal in India. Anuradda Ganesh, IIT Bombay, India

Eskom and Climate Change

LINC. energy. An IGCC Project at Chinchilla, Australia Based on Underground Coal Gasification (UCG)

UCG THE ACCEPTABLE FACE OF COAL MINING? Peter Dryburgh Regional Director, Scotland

The South African Coal Chain 2011

Introduction and Update to: Africary s Theunissen UCG Project

Overview of HELE coal combustion technologies. Dr Andrew Minchener OBE General Manager IEA Clean Coal Centre

INDCs low emission coal technology pledges

Coal now and in the future

Role for coal in a cleaner world

CCS challenges and opportunities for China. Dr Andrew J Minchener OBE

Fighting against the carbon challenge sequestration and new coal burning technology

GTC Conference 2011, San Francisco. Julie Lauder, CEO UCG ASSOCIATION

Carbon (CO 2 ) Capture

SOUTH AFRICAN COAL ROADMAP

LINC ENERGY s UCG UPDATE

Feature: New Project Development Using Innovative Technology

Clean coal and CCS in China and the developing economies of Asia. Dr Andrew J Minchener OBE

European UCG Case Study

Review of. for Power Generation Industry

of Rock Deformation and Groundwater Influx in Controlling Efficiency and Extraction rate in Underground Coal Gasification

International Power s CCS Initiatives.

IMPLEMENTING CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY THROUGH GASIFICATION AND LIQUEFACTION THE INDIAN PERSPECTIVE

Making the most of South Africa s low-quality coal: Converting high-ash coal to fuel gas using bubbling fluidised bed gasifiers

CO 2 Capture. John Davison IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme.

An update on CCS technologies & costs

PRECOMBUSTION TECHNOLOGY for Coal Fired Power Plant

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY (CCT) I

Outline of this presentation

Dry Low-NOx Combustion Technology for Novel Clean Coal Power Generation Aiming at the Realization of a Low Carbon Society

Underground Coal Gasification: An LLNL Primer

Overview: Formal offer received from The Coal Authority for the award of 100% of two low cost UCG Licences totalling 111 sq km in the UK: 42 sq km

THE FUTURE OF COAL: EXISTING POWER STATIONS CONSIDERATIONS FOR NEW STATIONS. Brett Cohen sti!s Power Sector Workshop 5 March 2013

THE POTENTIAL FOR UNDERGROUND COAL GASIFICATION IN INDIANA

Japanese Policy for Cleaner Coal - Towards Zero Emission

Canadian Clean Power Coalition: Clean Coal-Fired Power Plant Technology To Address Climate Change Concerns

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) - A Transformational Technology

Creating the Future of Coal-Fired Power Generation

2The J-POWER Group is one of the biggest coal users in Japan, consuming approximately 20 million

Eskom Holdings Ltd. Coal Presentation: A Presentation to the Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises. 28 January 2010

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY A TECHNICAL RESPONSE TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES

Coal power generation technology status and future requirements

CCUS Moving Ahead: Recent Technical Advances

IEA ENERGY TECHNOLOGY DAY Coal Fired Power and Efficiency

Commercialization of Clean Coal Technology with CO2 Recovery

The Next Gas Generation Ugas3. Mr. Andrew Haythorpe Managing Director ASX : LBY

SOUTH AFRICAN COAL ROADMAP

J-POWER s CCT Activities

Investor Presentation. Carbon Energy. May 2009

CO2 Capture - Technicalities of attaching a capture plant to Eskom s power stations

Overview: Formal offer received from The Coal Authority for the award of 100% of two low cost UCG Licences totalling 111 hectares in the UK:

Fluidised Bed Gasification of South African Coals Experimental Results and Process Integration

The Role of Engineering Simulation in Clean Coal Technologies

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) - A Transformational Technology

The Development of Clean Coal Technology in the US

Enabling a Brighter Tomorrow: E-Gas TM Gasification

Gasification Research in Australia: supporting deployment of low emissions power technologies. David Harris CSIRO Advanced Coal Technologies

Coal Gasification. Sankar Bhattacharya. Energy Technology Collaboration Division International Energy Agency, Paris INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY

Gasification of Non-Coking Coals

Climate Change: Policies and Business Opportunities in India

Coal to chemicals challenges in developing countries. Dr Andrew Minchener OBE General Manager IEA Clean Coal Centre

The Hope for Pakistan s Future

FutureGen The Right Project at the Right Time

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGY (CCT) II

N C S L L e g i s l a t i v e S u m m i t A u g u s t 1 1,

- The Osaki CoolGen Project -

Carbon Capture and Storage - Technology, costs and way forward

CO 2 Capture and Storage: Options and Challenges for the Cement Industry

Projects on 3 continents

IEA Clean Coal Centre.

SOUTH AFRICAN COAL ROADMAP OUTLOOK FOR THE COAL VALUE CHAIN: SCENARIOS TO 2040

The Need for Clean Coal in Africa The Case of Botswana

The State of Energy and Power Generation/ Consumption in China

Gasification Combined Cycles 101. Dr. Jeff Phillips EPRI

ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS 2015 IRP RENEWABLES TECHNICAL CONFERENCE

Poland s Energy Strategy: Clean Coal and Renewables

Clean Coal Technology and CCS in Japan

Underground Coal Gasification (UCG), its potential and its challenges

Sequestration Down Under

Coal-to-Liquids: Can CO 2 emissions be significantly reduced?

China s CCUS development and demonstration actions: a key part of the global initiative to lower carbon emissions

Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants ZEP European Technology Platform, Perspective of an Energy Supply Company

CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES, CHALLENGES AND FUTURE SCOPE

USE AND ELIMINATION OF METHANE IN COALMINE VENTILATION AIR (Cummings,D,R) DUT Pty Ltd

Transcription:

Case Study : Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) Majuba Update Mark van der Riet Corporate Consultant Eskom Holdings Ltd South Africa

Introduction Eskom presently generates 88% of its electricity from coal. This predominance will decrease, with the introduction of alternative energy carriers. Sustainable options are required to mitigate the continued usage of coal. Eskom has run a comprehensive Clean Coal Technology research and development program for several decades, to explore, identify and demonstrate solutions.

Coal Roadmapping Technology demonstrations are essential Technology transfer is required No single technical solution fits all needs South Africa needs to reduce dependency on coal for primary energy Eskom s own Clean Coal Roadmap is closely aligned with international best practice South Africa is also embarking on a national coal roadmap (SANERI/FFF)

IEA CCC Clean Coal Roadmap for India and RSA to 2030 Source : IEA-CCC 152, C Henderson, SJ Mills, Sept 2009 IEA-CCC suggested targets : 90% CO 2 removal, 45% efficiency, near-zero NO x, SO x, particulates

Eskom s Clean Coal Programme Improved efficiencies on existing Sub Critical Pulverised Coal Supercritical Pulverised Coal Medupi & Kusile Ultra-Supercritical Pulverised Coal - scanning Fluidised Bed Combustion - pilot Conventional and advanced emissions control - FGD Surface gasifier - IGCC Carbon Capture and Storage Underground coal gasification IGCC IGCC = Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle

Surface Plant (incl. IGCC) commercially proven with other gases UCG-IGCC Basic Principles Gas out UCG is a process where air is injected into the cavity, water enters from surrounding strata, and partial combustion and gasification take place at the coal seam face after ignition. The resulting high-pressure gas stream is returned to the surface, where the gas is dried and then combusted in a high-efficiency power station to generate electricity. Air in Graphic Reference : Science & Technology Review, Lawrence Livermore National Lab, USA, April 2007 UCG commercially proven in Former Soviet Union (FSU) Eskom is demonstrating in RSA

UCG Current World Trends FSU Uzbekistan : Angren commercial plant refurbishing New Zealand : Solid Energy NZ starting site characterisation R&D. Eventual UCG-CCGT USA : Laurus Energy investigating a 2.3 bt resource in Wyoming CIRI developing a 100MW UCG-CCGT in Alaska LLNL investigating the potential of UCG + H 2 production + CO 2 sequestration Australia : Linc Energy Pilot plant recommissioned. Relocating to S. Australia Carbon Energy 100d pilot trial successful. 20MWe pilot with CCS announced Cougar Energy site characterisation successful, and 10,000 Nm3/h pilot under construction

UCG Current World Trends cont. UK : Being investigated for coal under the Firth of Forth Clean Coal investigating 5 North Sea coal resource sites VP Power drilling in the Kish Basin, Dublin Bay India : GAIL approved a feasibility study Abhijeet Group investigating UCG-CCGT Pakistan : approved a feasibility study for UCG-CCGT Vietnam : study underway with JV : Marubeni, Linc Energy and Vinacomin China : Historically 16 sites, typically small scale New initiatives underway for SNG and methanol, following a successful 1 month trial Southern Africa : Eskom & Sasol, with several other entrants emerging

Eskom Strategic Drivers for UCG-IGCC 1.Security of supply 2.Clean energy 3.Flexibility 4.Utilize Unminable Coal 5.Lower cost option Baseload option Lower C0 2 Emissions (25 % lower than super critical PF coal) Modularity, lead time Potentially 350GWe Better utilisation than conventional mining Competitive R/MWh

LCA Comparative Emissions CO2 kg/mwh net 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Conv PF Super PF Conv IGCC UCG-IGCC Nat Gas CC (Without FGD) (With S removal to suit GT) CO2 NOx SOx Particulates 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 NOx/SOx/Particulates kg/mwh net Data Reference : Australian ACARP Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) study, Case Study B20, June 2002 The only cleaner coal-based technology is the developing ultra-supercritical PF

Environmental Precautions Water : Surrounding aquifers monitored monthly concentric perimeters. No UCG contamination evident Air : Baseline air quality tests. Continuous ambient emission monitoring Land : Baseline flora & fauna survey & soil tests Comprehensive EMP & regular audits Majuba site shows natural vegetation re-establishes rapidly after drilling disruption Subsidence is being monitored at Majuba using devices for conventional underground monitoring. The potential strata collapse has also been modelled. Minimal subsidence observed Outer Water Sampling Zone Inner Water Sampling Zone Production Area UCG Water Monitoring Network Sungazer Lizard Preservation Ambient Monitoring Station

UCG Aquifer Philosophy The UCG cavity pressure always maintained < hydrostatic pressure flow is always inwards Production wells steel-lined & cemented down to coal seam protects the surrounding aquifers Ash left underground UCG temperature = + 1200 o C leaching tests underway Majuba seam capped by 180m of dolorite sills & segmented by dykes Lateral water flow is nil/low Australian pilot (1999-2003) had 3 rd party audit, approved by Austr. EPA Seam Diagram not in proportion In Majuba, coal seam is 3-5m thick, and 280m underground

Resource Utilisation Efficiency 20% of coal resource utilised Thermal Efficiency Beneficiation Mining 20 36% of coal resource utilised 50 0% Super-critical Power Station with Longwall Mine & Beneficiation 100% 66 Thermal Efficiency Chemical Efficiency Mining Efficiency 36 0% UCG-IGCC 100% 71 95 Thermal Efficiency 0.5% of resource utilised 1% Extraction Efficiency 50 0% CCGT with CBM 100%

UCG Coal Value Chain Reduction = Less Cost The shorter value chain translates to lower cost, confirmed with Eskom concept-level and international costing

Eskom s UCG Progress Scanning study - April 2001, Eskom noted UCG technology potential. Scoping study - Nov 2002, highlighted potential at Majuba colliery Pre-feasibility study - Dec 2003, confirmed Majuba potential Detailed site characterisation study - July 2005, confirmed the potential 20 th January 2007 Eskom commissioned a 3-5000 Nm 3 /h pilot plant on Majuba coalfield 31 st May 2007 first electricity generated from UCG gas at Majuba 7km x 600mm NB steel pipeline built to link UCG with Majuba U4 Mar 2010 cofiring UCG gas into Majuba Design underway for a 100-140 MW OCGT demo plant Engineering and EIA will commence thereafter for a new 2100 MW power station, based on UCG and Combined Cycle Gas Turbine-Steam Turbine Gas Pipeline Horseshoe construction 108 MWe Alstom GT11N2

Eskom s UCG Progress UCG Site

Eskom s UCG Progress Average Gas Quality (ex. Pilot plant, May 2009) : Min (% vol) Max Hydrogen H2 14.0 18.0 Oxygen O2 0.2 0.2 Water Vapour H2O 5.0 5.0 Atm. Nitrogen N2 44.3 52.0 Carbon Monoxide CO 7.0 11.0 Carbon Dioxide CO2 16.5 18.5 Methane CH4 2.8 4.5

Eskom UCG Indicative Development Done 2002 Scoping Study 2003 Pre-feasibility Study 2005 Site Characterisation 20th January 2007 Commissioned 5000 Nm3/h pilot plant on Majuba coalfield Apr 2009 Mar 2011 Jan 2014 Jun 2014 Mar 2018 Sep 2020 6MW Cofire DRA = Decision Release Approval = Design, Engineering & Costing To do 40MW Demonstration Plant Ph2 DRA ERA COD ERA = Execution Release Approval = Procure, Construct and Commission 2100MW Commercial Plant DRA ERA U1 COD U2 COD U3 COD U4 COD U5 COD U6 COD

UCG CCS Potential + UCG creates a cavity that could potentially sequester CO 2 + The remnant coal, char and ash would have a higher surface area for CO 2 sorption + Infrastructure and wells already in place Requires depth > 800m Interaction of CO 2 with remnant coal, char and ash must be proven There is much research to be done! UCG leaves behind a heat effect cavity, with unknown behaviour

UCG Conclusions UCG is a promising clean coal option which allows the effective extraction and use of RSA coal resources UCG has a role to play in the reduction of greenhouse gases and has possible potential for carbon capture and storage UCG is gaining momentum worldwide The Eskom UCG pilot has been operating reliably for 33+ months No environmental impacts have been noted to date Based on work to date, UCG appears to be a very promising, stable and viable primary energy (baseload) option with potential on multiple sites Eskom is embarking on commercialisation of the technology, with the first milestone being successful operation of a 40 MW demonstration plant

Thank You Majuba UCG E Class GT Eskom s Ankerlig OCGT