Building Code Action Committee (BCAC) General Work Group Copyright 2016 International Code Council, Inc. September 21-22, 2016 Meeting BCAC Public Comments (Agenda Item ) This report includes codes changes, report of hearing and public comments for code changes that are included in the matrix of code changes that the BCAC has proposed or has been monitoring as related issues. G17-16, Pt I Page 2 RB170-16 Page 8 ADM68-16 Page 10 F89-16, Pt II Page 13 RB7-16 Page 16 ADM2-16, Pt IV Pg 18 ADM4-16,Pt I Page 19 ADM4-16,Pt II Pg 21 ADM4-16,Pt III Pg 23 ADM9-16,Pt I Page 25 ADM49-16 Page 28 ADM10-16,Pt II Pg 30 ADM26-16, Pt I Pg 32 ADM27-16 Pt I Pg 35 ADM40-16 Page 37 Summary BCAC has submitted 9 public comments: G17 Pt I, RB170, ADM68, RB7, ADM2 Pt IV, ADM4 Pt I, ADM9 Pt I, ADM10 Pt II, ADM40 There are public comments from others on the following BCAC: G17 Pt I, ADM4 Pt II, ADM4 Pt III Public comments from others on related code changes are: F89 Pt II, ADM9 Pt I, ADM49, ADM26 Pt I, ADM27 Pt I Page 1 of 38
G17-16 Part I IBC:, 1512, 1512.1, 202 (New), [BG] 1510.7, [BG] 1510.7.1, [BG] 1510.7.2, [BG] 1510.7.3, [BG] 1510.7.4. Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Building Code Add new definition as follows: SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM. A system that converts solar radiation to usable energy, including photovoltaic panel system and solar thermal system. SOLAR THERMAL COLLECTOR. Components in a solar thermal system that collect and convert solar radiation to thermal energy. SOLAR THERMAL SYSTEM. A system that converts solar radiation to thermal energy for use in heating or cooling. Delete without substitution: [BG] 1510.7 Photovoltaic panels and modules. Rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panels and modules shall be designed in accordance with this section. [BG] 1510.7.1 Wind resistance. Rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panels and modules shall be designed for component and cladding wind loads in accordance with Chapter 16 using an effective wind area based on the dimensions of a single unit frame. [BG] 1510.7.2 Fire classification. Rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panels and modules shall have the fire classification in accordance with Section 1505.9. [BG] 1510.7.3 Installation. Rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panels and Page 2 of 38
modules shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. [BG] 1510.7.4 Photovoltaic panels and modules. Rooftop-mounted photovoltaicpanels and modules shall be listed and labeled in accordance with UL 1703 and shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Revise as follows: SECTION 1512 PHOTOVOLTAIC PANELS AND MODULES SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS 1512.1 Photovoltaic panels and modules and solar thermal collectors. Photovoltaic panels and modules and solar thermal collectors installed upon a roof or as an integral part of a roof assembly shall comply with the requirements of this code and the International Fire CodeSection 3111. Reason: The proposed terms "solar thermal collector" and "solar thermal system" are from ICC 900/SRCC 300-15, Solar Thermal System Standard. These terms are currently used in the IRC and it is therefore appropriate for the defintions to be included. The expansion of Section 3111 in the International Building Code by Proposal G211-15 in the Group A cycle covers all that is within Section 1510.7 and its subsections, as well as providing all the applicable requirements for photovoltaic panels and modules in one location of the code. There are additional requirements that apply to rooftop-mounted photovoltaic panels and modules that are not covered in Section 1510.7, including roof access, signage, routing of conductors, and additional electrical requirements. By locating all applicable requirements in one location in the chapter for Special Construction, all applicable requirements will be addressed. In addition, Section 3111 also covers all the applicable requirements for solar thermal systems, which include the solar thermal collectors mounted on the roof. Revising Section 1512.1 provides the appropriate pointer to the requirements in Section 3111. This proposal is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. In 2014 and 2015 the BCAC has held 5 open meetings. In Page 3 of 38
addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed changes. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/codedevelopment-process/building-code-action-committee-bcac/) Cost Impact: Will not increase the cost of construction No cost increase as this correlates the requirements relocated to Section 3111. Public Hearing Results G17-16 Part I : [BG] 1510.7- KULIK13908 Part I Committee Action: Disapproved Committee Reason: The committee found the proposal to be confusing and noted that conflicting testimony was heard. Assembly Action: None Individual Consideration Agenda Public Comment 1: Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) requests Approve as Modified by this Public Comment. Replace Proposal as Follows: 2015 International Building Code Page 4 of 38
SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEM. A system that converts solar radiation to usable energy, including photovoltaic panel system and solar thermal system. SOLAR THERMAL COLLECTOR. Components in a solar thermal system that collect and convert solar radiation to thermal energy. SOLAR THERMAL SYSTEM. A system that converts solar radiation to thermal energy for use in heating or cooling. Commenter's Reason: These are terms that are used in both the IRC and the IBC. G17-16 Part II was accepted to include these terms in the IRC. This public comment is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. Between 2014 and 2016 the BCAC has held 8 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed public comments. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codestech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-actioncommittee-bcac/) Proponent : Joseph Cain, representing Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) (JoeCainPE@gmail.com) requests Approve as Submitted. Commenter's Reason: The proponent of this Public Comment recommends Approval as Submitted for Proposal G17-16 Part I. This action would be consistent with Proposal G211-15 of Group A, which establishes the "road map" for design and installation of solar energy systems -- including solar Page 5 of 38
photovoltaic systems and solar thermal systems -- in IBC Section 3111. Note that in the original proposal G17-16, Section 1510.7.3 was also intended to be in strike-out, as that section was also relocated to Section 3111 by G211-15. The strike-out of Section 1510.7.3 was missed owing to a staff error, and was not caught in the update of the monograph. Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) requests Approve as Submitted. Commenter's Reason: These changes are needed to assist the user of the code to locate and apply all the appropriate requirements for both photovoltaic and solar thermal installations. The expansion of Section 3111 in the International Building Code by Proposal G211-15 in the Group A cycle consolidated all the applicable requirements into one location. This helps ensure all the requirements are applied, and to avoid confusion and redundancies. 1. The terms "solar energy system", "solar thermal collector", and "solar thermal system" are used in both the IBC and IRC. These definitions were approved in G17-16 Part II for inclusion in the IRC. To help ensure the same level of enforcement of the related requirements, these terms need to be defined in both the IBC and IRC. 2. The requirements currently in Section 1510.7 only address a portion of the requirements applicable to rooftop mounted photovoltaic panel systems. All the requirements, including what is covered in Section 1510.7, are covered in Section 3111 by the action taken for G211-15. These photovoltaic panel systems are special construction, not a part of the defined roof assembly. The action taken on S49-16 already removed one of the four requirements (wind resistance) from Section 1510.7, which makes this section further incomplete and potentially create confusion as to all the requirements applicable to installing these systems. 3. Section 1512 needs to be expanded to recognize the installation of solar thermal systems on top of roof assemblies. Also this section needs to direct the code user specifically to Section 3111 in order to locate all Page 6 of 38
the applicable requirements. Partially repeating requirements in separate locations of the code leads to diverging requirements and inconsistent application of requirements. This public comment is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. Between 2014 and 2016 the BCAC has held 8 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed public comments. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codestech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-actioncommittee-bcac/) G17-16 Part I Page 7 of 38
RB170-16 IRC: 202 (New), R327 (New), R327.1 (New), R327.2 (New), R327.3 (New). Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Residential Code VEHICULAR GATE. A gate that is intended for use at a vehicular entrance or exit to the lot of a one- or two- family dwelling and that is not intended for use by pedestrian traffic. SECTION R327 AUTOMATIC VEHICULAR GATES R327.1 General. Automatic vehicular gates shall comply with the requirements of Sections R327.2 and R327.3. R327.2 Vehicular gates intended for automation. Vehicular gates intended for automation shall be designed, constructed and installed to comply with the requirements of ASTM F 2200. R327.3 Vehicular gate openers. Vehicular gate openers shall be listed in accordance with UL 325. Reference standards type: This is an update to reference standard(s) already in the ICC Code Books Add new standard(s) as follows: To be added to Chapter 43, Referenced Standards: ASTM F2200-14, Standard Specification for Automated Vehicular Gate Construction and UL 325-2013, Standard for Door, Drapery, Gate, Louver, and Window Operators and Systems Reason: We are proposing that the current provisions as contained in Appendix O be moved into the main body of the code. The language continues to not require the use of automated vehicular gates, but where gates intended for automation are provided sets necessary and appropriate minimum safety requirements as established in the applicable consensus standards. The provisions belong in the main body of the code for consistency with similar provisions contained in the main body of both the International Building Code (Section 3110) and the International Fire Code (Sections 503.5 and 503.6.) Automated vehicular gate safety is important in all applications; therefore one- and two-family dwellings should be covered by this requirement and not be an option for jurisdictions adopting the IRC. This proposal is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. In 2014 and 2015 the BCAC has held 5 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed changes. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-action-committee-bcac/) Cost Impact: Will increase the cost of construction This proposal may increase the cost of construction as it would mandate minimum standards for the design, construction and installation or vehicular gates only where they are provided. This would not increase the cost of construction where vehicular gates currently meet these standards. Public Hearing Results RB170-16 : R327 (NEW)- KULIK11029 Committee Action: Committee Reason: These provisions would work very well in an appendix. Assembly Action: Disapproved None Individual Consideration Agenda Page 8 of 38
Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) requests Approve as Submitted. Commenter's Reason: Minimum life safety requirements should be covered in the code, not the appendices. If this code is adopted without the appendices, then there would not be any requirements in the jurisdiction to appropriately address the hazards associated where automatic vehicular gates are installed. Further, the IBC currently has these requirements within the main body of the code. The safety risk is no different in a residential application than those covered in the IBC. This public comment is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. Between 2014 and 2016 the BCAC has held 8 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed public comments. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-actioncommittee-bcac/) RB170-16 Page 9 of 38
ADM68-16 IRC: R105.2 Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Residential Code Revise as follows: R105.2 Work exempt from permit. Exemption from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. Permits shall not be required for the following: Building: 1. One-story detached accessory structures, other than garages, provided that the floor area does not exceed 200 square 2 feet (18.58 m ). 2. Fences not over 7 feet (2134 mm) high. 3. Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge. 4. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18 927 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. 5. Sidewalks and driveways. 6. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. 7. Prefabricated swimming pools that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep. 8. Swings and other playground equipment. 9. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than 54 inches (1372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 2 10.Decks not exceeding 200 square feet (18.58 m ) in area, that are not more than 30 inches (762 mm) above grade at any point, are not attached to a dwelling do not serve the exit door required by Section R311.4. Electrical: 1. Listed cord-and-plug connected temporary decorative lighting. 2. Reinstallation of attachment plug receptacles but not the outlets therefor. 3. Replacement of branch circuit overcurrent devices of the required capacity in the same location. 4. Electrical wiring, devices, appliances, apparatus or equipment operating at less than 25 volts and not capable of supplying more than 50 watts of energy. 5. Minor repair work, including the replacement of lamps or the connection of approved portable electrical equipment to approved permanently installed receptacles. Gas: 1. Portable heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances. 2. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe. 3. Portable-fuel-cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid. Mechanical: 1. Portable heating appliances. 2. Portable ventilation appliances. 3. Portable cooling units. 4. Steam, hot- or chilled-water piping within any heating or cooling equipment regulated by this code. 5. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe. 6. Portable evaporative coolers. 7. Self-contained refrigeration systems containing 10 pounds (4.54 kg) or less of refrigerant or that are actuated by motors of 1 horsepower (746 W) or less. 8. Portable-fuel-cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid. Plumbing: 1. The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste or vent pipe; provided, however, that if any concealed trap, drainpipe, water, soil, waste or vent pipe becomes defective and it becomes necessary to remove and replace the same with new material, such work shall be considered as new work and a permit shall be obtained and inspection made as provided in this code. 2. The clearing of stoppages or the repairing of leaks in pipes, valves or fixtures, and the removal and reinstallation of Page 10 of 38
water closets, provided such repairs do not involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves, pipes or fixtures. Reason: The IRC exception for building permits being required was increased from allowing a maximum of 120 sq. foot to a maximum of 200 sq. foot for a Residential Accessory structure with the intent to allow larger storage sheds than in the past due to the fact that they typically have a limited fuel load and rarely had structural corrections at the time of inspection. The exemption as written has allowed a larger size capable of fitting typical passenger cars and has caused confusion and misinterpretation and now some code officials are interpreting this to mean that a private garage is also exempt from permits. This is creating increased hazards due to the increased fuel loads associated with personal vehicles being stored in these structures without the intended fire separation when the accessory structures are detached but directly adjacent to dwellings, dwelling sleeping rooms etc. The same potential fire hazard occurs when the detached garage structures are being placed directly on or near the property line. This code change would provide clarification to the existing code language. This proposal is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. In 2014 and 2015 the BCAC has held 5 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed changes. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-action-committee-bcac/) Cost Impact: Will not increase the cost of construction This proposal is meant to clarify the existing requirements; therefore it is not intended to increase the cost of construction. Committee Action: Public Hearing Results ADM68-16 : R105.2- KULIK11031 Disapproved Committee Reason: This proposal is ambiguous and subject to local interpretations without a definition for "garage." A shed must meet the requirements of the code even if a permit is not required. You could have the same risks in a shed that you would in a garage. Assembly Action: None Individual Consideration Agenda Public Comment 1: Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) requests Approve as Modified by this Public Comment. Modify as Follows: 2015 International Residential Code R105.2 Work exempt from permit. Exemption from permit requirements of this code shall not be deemed to grant authorization for any work to be done in any manner in violation of the provisions of this code or any other laws or ordinances of this jurisdiction. Permits shall not be required for the following: Building: 1. One-story detached accessory structures, other than garages, provided that the floor area does not exceed 200 180 square feet (18.58 16.72 m 2 ). 2. Fences not over 7 feet (2134 mm) high. 3. Retaining walls that are not over 4 feet (1219 mm) in height measured from the bottom of the footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge. 4. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18 927 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. 5. Sidewalks and driveways. 6. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. 7. Prefabricated swimming pools that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep. Page 11 of 38
8. Swings and other playground equipment. 9. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than 54 inches (1372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 2 10.Decks not exceeding 200 square feet (18.58 m ) in area, that are not more than 30 inches (762 mm) above grade at any point, are not attached to a dwelling do not serve the exit door required by Section R311.4. Electrical: 1. Listed cord-and-plug connected temporary decorative lighting. 2. Reinstallation of attachment plug receptacles but not the outlets therefor. 3. Replacement of branch circuit overcurrent devices of the required capacity in the same location. 4. Electrical wiring, devices, appliances, apparatus or equipment operating at less than 25 volts and not capable of supplying more than 50 watts of energy. 5. Minor repair work, including the replacement of lamps or the connection of approved portable electrical equipment to approved permanently installed receptacles. Gas: 1. Portable heating, cooking or clothes drying appliances. 2. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe. 3. Portable-fuel-cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid. Mechanical: 1. Portable heating appliances. 2. Portable ventilation appliances. 3. Portable cooling units. 4. Steam, hot- or chilled-water piping within any heating or cooling equipment regulated by this code. 5. Replacement of any minor part that does not alter approval of equipment or make such equipment unsafe. 6. Portable evaporative coolers. 7. Self-contained refrigeration systems containing 10 pounds (4.54 kg) or less of refrigerant or that are actuated by motors of 1 horsepower (746 W) or less. 8. Portable-fuel-cell appliances that are not connected to a fixed piping system and are not interconnected to a power grid. Plumbing: 1. The stopping of leaks in drains, water, soil, waste or vent pipe; provided, however, that if any concealed trap, drainpipe, water, soil, waste or vent pipe becomes defective and it becomes necessary to remove and replace the same with new material, such work shall be considered as new work and a permit shall be obtained and inspection made as provided in this code. 2. The clearing of stoppages or the repairing of leaks in pipes, valves or fixtures, and the removal and reinstallation of water closets, provided such repairs do not involve or require the replacement or rearrangement of valves, pipes or fixtures. Commenter's Reason: In response to the committees concerns that the proposed change potentially created confusion by introducing the term "garage" without a definition for that term, the proposal has been modified by addressing the issue by size. A 200 square foot detached garage would be in many cases a practical minimum size to fit an automobile in functionally. By reducing the 200 sq ft to 180 sq ft will effectually clarify application of the permit exemption to accessory structures other than detached garages which was the original intent. This public comment is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. Between 2014 and 2016 the BCAC has held 8 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed public comments. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-actioncommittee-bcac/) ADM68-16 Page 12 of 38
F89-16 Part II IRC: R324.4 (New), R324.4.1 (New), R324.4.1(1) (New), R324.4.1(2) (New), R324.4.1.1 (New), R324.4.1.2 (New), R324.4.2 (New), R324.4.3 (New). Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : William Brooks, Brooks Engineering, representing Photovoltaic Industry Code Council (billbrooks7@sbcglobal.net) 2015 International Residential Code Add new text as follows: R324.4 Buildings with Rapid Shutdown. Buildings with solar PV systems shall have permanent labels in accordance with Sections R324.4.1 through R324.4.3.3 R324.4.1 Rapid shutdown type. The type of PV system rapid shutdown shall be labeled with one of the following:> 1. For PV systems that shutdown the array and conductors leaving the array a label shall be provided. The first two lines of the label shall be capitalized characters with a minimum height of 9.5 mm (3 8 in.) in black on yellow background and the remaining characters shall be capitalized with a minimum height of 4.8 mm (3/16 in.) in black on white background. The label shall be in accordance with Figure 605.11.3.1(1) and state the following: SOLAR PV SYSTEM IS EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN TURN RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH TO THE "OFF" POSITION TO SHUTDOWN PV SYSTEM AND REDUCE SHOCK HAZARD IN ARRAY. 2. For PV systems that only shutdown conductors leaving the array a label shall be provided. The first two lines of the label shall be capitalized characters with a minimum height of 9.5 mm (3 8 in.) in white on red background and the remaining characters shall be capitalized with a minimum height of 4.8 mm (3/16 in.) in black on white background.the label shall be in accordance with Figure 605.11.3.1(2) and state the following: SOLAR PV SYSTEM IS EQUIPPED WITH RAPID SHUTDOWN TURN RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH TO THE "OFF" POSITION TO SHUTDOWN CONDUCTORS OUTSIDE THE ARRAY. CONDUCTORS IN ARRAY REMAIN ENERGIZED IN SUNLIGHT. R324.4.1.1 Diagram. The labels in R324.4.1 shall include a simple diagram of a building with a roof. Diagram sections in red signify sections of the PV system that are not shutdown when the rapid shutdown switch is turned off. R324.4.1.2 Location. The rapid shutdown label in R324.4.1 shall be located not more than 1 meter (3 ft) from the service disconnecting means to which the PV systems are connected, and shall indicate the location of all identified rapid shutdown switches if not at the same location. R324.4.2 Buildings with more than one rapid shutdown type. For buildings that have PV systems with both rapid shutdown types or a PV system with a rapid shutdown type and a PV system with no rapid shutdown, a detailed plan view diagram of the roof shall be provided showing each different PV system and a dotted line around areas that remain energized after the rapid shutdown switch is operated. R324.4.3 Rapid shutdown switch. A rapid shutdown switch shall have a label located not more than 1 meter (3 ft) from the switch that states the following: RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM FIGURE R324.4.1(1) LABEL FOR PV SYSTEMS THAT REDUCE SHOCK HAZARD WITHIN ARRAY AND SHUTDOWN CONDUCTORS LEAVING ARRAY Page 13 of 38
FIGURE R324.4.1(2) LABEL FOR PV SYSTEMS THAT ONLY SHUTDOWN CONDUCTORS LEAVING THE ARRAY Reason: These new marking requirements for Rapid Shutdown PV systems were initially developed by the NFPA Fire Fighter Safety and PV Systems Task Group that was reorganized in December of 2014. This collaborative Task Group is working on proposals for NFPA1, NFPA70, and other related documents. This Task Group is made up of over 20 participants from Code Making Panel 4 of the NFPA70, the solar industry, the fire service, the insurance industry, test laboratories, and other relevant Page 14 of 38
stakeholders. The Rapid Shutdown marking requirements proposed in this second revision input includes the language for these signs and greyscale figures of the color signs to print in the Code. Actual examples of these signs will exist in the handbook of the 2017 NEC Handbook for section 690.56(C) and the Annex of NFPA1, 2018 edition. The signs are provided in the attachment so that reviewers can visualize what the signs are intended to look like. Two different signs are required on buildings depending on what type of rapid shutdown system is on the building. Systems with multiple rapid shutdown types will be required to have a detailed directory since a simple sign will not be sufficient to clarify the levels of hazard on the roof. Lastly, all switches that are intended to be used as rapid shutdown switches shall be labeled with the words, "RAPID SHUTDOWN SWITCH FOR SOLAR PV SYSTEM." Cost Impact: Will increase the cost of construction The manufacturing of signs and applying those signs at the appropriate locations does add a small cost to a solar PV system. This cost is appropriate given value of helping emergency responders understand the level of hazard they will encounter with a PV system. Public Hearing Results F89-16 Part II : R324.4 (NEW)- BROOKS13833 Part II Committee Action: Committee Reason: These electrical requirements do not belong in the International Residential Code. They are more appropriate for NFPA 70. In any case, such requirements should be finalized by in the National Electrical Code before being considered for inclusion in the International Residential Code. Disapproved Assembly Motion: Online Vote Results: Support: 50.17% (147) Oppose: 49.83% (146) Assembly Action: As Submitted Successful Approved as Submitted Individual Consideration Agenda Proponent : Assembly Motion requests Approve as Submitted. Commenter's Reason: This code change proposal is on the agenda for individual consideration because the proposal received a successful assembly motion. The assembly action for Approve as Submitted was Successful by a vote of 50.17% (147) to 49.83% (146) by eligible members online during the period of May 11 - May 26, 2016. Proponent : Rebecca Baker, representing Jefferson County, CO / Colorado Chapter of the International Code Council (bbaker@co.jefferson.co.us) requests Disapprove. Commenter's Reason: There are requirements for PV rapid shutdown signage in the 2014 NEC. It will be problematic if this code has different requirements than the NEC. F89-16 Part II Page 15 of 38
RB7-16 IRC: R202 (New). Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Residential Code Add new text as follows: SECTION R202 DEFINITIONS DETACHED. For the purposes of Section R101.2, a building that is not attached or fastened to an adjacent building and does not share common building elements with an adjacent building. Reason: This IRC proposal is intended to clarify: a) What is meant by "detached" in Section R101.2, Scope b) What must be done when IRC dwellings are built with zero clearance to lot lines (not just between townhouse dwelling units, but also between one-family dwelling dwellings such as a row house in an urban environment) c) What happens as townhomes and row houses age and individual units are destroyed by fire and must be replaced d) What must be done when row houses in an urban setting are demolished and rebuilt Note that Section R302.1 and its associated tables permit fire resistant construction requirements. This proposal is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. In 2014 and 2015 the BCAC has held 5 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed changes. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-action-committee-bcac/) Cost Impact: Will not increase the cost of construction This proposal is intended as a clarifiation of the current provisions of the IRC; therefore no increase in the cost of construction is expected. Committee Action: Public Hearing Results RB7-16 : R202 (NEW)- KULIK11035 Committee Reason: There are other items or structures, such as a deck, that could be detached. Common use of the term "detached" and the standard dictionary definition work, making a code specific definition unnecessary. Disapproved Assembly Action: None Individual Consideration Agenda Public Comment 1: Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) requests Approve as Modified by this Public Comment. Modify as Follows: 2015 International Residential Code SECTION R202 DEFINITIONS DETACHED. For the purposes of Section R101.2, a A building or structure that is not attached or fastened to an adjacent building or structure and does not share common building or structural elements with an adjacent building or structure. Commenter's Reason: After discussion during the code hearing the committee passed a modification that would have struck the language "For purposes of Section R101.2" to expand the definition to other structures such as decks regulated by the code. Once that modification was passed it was identified that simply referring to "building" within the definition would not Page 16 of 38
address other structures and that it was preferred that the proposal come back in a public comment to clean up the expansion. As modified by this public comment the new definition will clarify what a detached building or structure is. This public comment is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. Between 2014 and 2016 the BCAC has held 8 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed public comments. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-actioncommittee-bcac/) RB7-16 Page 17 of 38
ADM2-16 Part IV IRC: R202 Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Janine Snyder, representing PMGCAC (PMGCAC@iccsafe.org); David Collins, representing SEHPCAC (SEHPCAC@iccsafe.org); Edward Kulik (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Residential Code Revise as follows: [RB] ALTERATION. Any construction, retrofit or renovation to an existing structure other than repair or addition that requires a permit. Also, a any change in a building, electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system that involves an extension, addition or change to the arrangement, type or purpose of the original installation that requires a permit. Public Hearing Results ADM2-16 Part IV : R202 [RB]- SNYDER13915 Part IV Committee Action: Disapproved Committee Reason: Deleting "that which requires a permit" and adding "any" creates a statement that is too broad. Assembly Action: None Individual Consideration Agenda Public Comment 1: Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) requests Approve as Modified by this Public Comment. Modify as Follows: 2015 International Residential Code [RB] ALTERATION. Any construction, retrofit or renovation to an existing structure other than repair or addition. Also, any a change in a building electrical, gas, mechanical or plumbing system that involves an extension, addition or change to the arrangement, type or purpose of the original installation. Commenter's Reason: Alterations can occur regardless of the requirement for a permit. The requirement for a permit is a technical requirement provision covered by Chapter 1 of code. As modified this PC eliminates the incorrect technical language and deletes the addition of the word "any" to eliminate the broad application the committee objected to. The ICC Plumbing, Mechanical and Fuel Gas Code Action Committee was co-proponent of the original proposal and are in support of this public comment. This public comment is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. Between 2014 and 2016 the BCAC has held 8 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed public comments. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-actioncommittee-bcac/) ADM2-16 Part IV Page 18 of 38
ADM4-16 Part I IEBC: 202; ISPSC: 202 Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Existing Building Code Revise as follows: [A] APPROVED. Acceptable to the code officialor authority having jurisdiction. 2015 International Swimming Pool and Spa Code Revise as follows: [A] APPROVED. Acceptable to the code official or authority having jurisdiction. Reason: The intent of this proposal is to provide consistent language for the defined term 'Approved' within the I-codes. In several of the current I-codes, including the IBC and IFC and IMC the term is currently defined as "APPROVED. Acceptable to the code official." There is a published errata to the IPC for the defintion for 'approved' that matches what is proposed here. This proposal is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC), the ICC Plumbing, Mechanical and Fuel Gas Code Action Committee (PMGCAC) and High Performance Code Action Committee (SEHPCAC).. BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. In 2014 and 2015 the BCAC has held 5 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed changes. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-codeaction-committee-bcac/) The PMGCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. This includes both the technical aspects of the codes and the code content in terms of scope and application of referenced standards. The PMGCAC has held one open meeting and multiple conference calls which included members of the PMGCAC. Interested parties also participated in all conference calls to discuss and debate the proposed changes. The SEHPCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance International Codes with regard to sustainability, energy and high performance as it relates to the built environment included, but not limited to, how these criteria relate to the International Green Construction Code (IgCC) and the International Energy Conservation Code (IECC). In 2015, the SEHPCAC has held three two- or three-day open meetings and 25 workgroup calls, which included members of the SEHPCAC as well as any interested parties, to discuss and debate proposed changes and public comments. Cost Impact: Will not increase the cost of construction No increase in costs as this is an editorial correlation of defined terms between the I-codes. Public Hearing Results ADM4-16 Part I : 202 APPROVED- KULIK13844 Part I Committee Action: Disapproved Committee Reason: Small jurisdictions do not always have a code official. Someone other than the code official may be approving parts of the construction, such as a flood plain manager or a historic building committee. Therefore, the phrase "or authority having jurisdiction" should remain in the definition. The definition in the IBC, IFC and IMC should be revised to coordinate with the IEBC and ISPSC rather than the other way around. Assembly Action: None Page 19 of 38
Individual Consideration Agenda Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) requests Approve as Submitted. Commenter's Reason: What is considered acceptable in an installation covered by this code should be determined by the person responsible for enforcing the code. Section 104, and the definition of the term "code official", establishes the code official as the person having the authority to enforce and interpret the code. The term "authority having jurisdiction" is not defined in this code. The term "authority having jurisdiction" needs to be removed from the definition of "approved" to avoid any confusion as to who is responsible for making the decision to accept the installation. This public comment is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. Between 2014 and 2016 the BCAC has held 8 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed public comments. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-actioncommittee-bcac/) ADM4-16 Part I Page 20 of 38
ADM4-16 Part II IECC-CE: C202 Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Energy Conservation Code Revise as follows: SECTION C202 DEFINITIONS APPROVED. Approval by Acceptable to the code officialas a result of investigation and tests conducted by him or her, or by reason of accepted principles or tests by nationally recognized organizations. Reason: The intent of this proposal is to provide consistent language for the defined term 'Approved' within the I-codes. In several of the current I-codes, including the IBC and IFC and IMC the term is currently defined as "APPROVED. Acceptable to the code official." There is a published errata to the IPC for the defintion for 'approved' that matches what is proposed here. This proposal is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. In 2014 and 2015 the BCAC has held 5 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed changes. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-action-committee-bcac/) Cost Impact: Will not increase the cost of construction No increase in costs as this is an editorial correlation of defined terms between the I-codes. Public Hearing Results ADM4-16 Part II : C202-KULIK13845 Part II Committee Action: Committee Reason: Approval was based on the proponent's published reason statements. Assembly Action: Approved as Submitted None Individual Consideration Agenda Proponent : William Fay, Energy Efficient Codes Coalition, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition; Jeffrey Harris, Alliance to Save Energy, representing Alliance to Save Energy (JeffHarris22@outlook.com); Charlie Haack, ICF International, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition; Maureen Guttman, Building Codes Assistance Project, representing Building Codes Assistance Project (mguttman@bcapcodes.org); Harry Misuriello, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition (misuriello@verizon.net); William Prindle, ICF International, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition requests Disapprove. Commenter's Reason: This proposal should be disapproved because it removes reasonable guidance from the IECC definition of "approved." While we can appreciate the objective of having common definitions across all the I-Codes wherever sensible, we disagree with the practice of reducing the definitions to the "least common denominator" version. The current definition of "approved" should remain in the IECC residential and commercial sections. The current definition of "approved" in the IECC makes clear that approval may involve not only a code official's judgment, but also objective tests or nationally-recognized standards. This recognizes the critical role played by standard-setting organizations to facilitate and simplify the role of the code official. Obviously, the code official or authority having jurisdiction maintains the final judgment on whether a building complies with the code or not. But we do not think it is wise to remove these options from the definition (as proposed by ADM4) simply for the sake of matching a definition in another code. If anything, we would prefer to see the more robust definition of the IECC repeated in other codes. We recommend disapproval of ADM4. Page 21 of 38
Page 22 of 38 ADM4-16 Part II
ADM4-16 Part III IECC-RE: R202 Proposed Change as Submitted Proponent : Edward Kulik, representing Building Code Action Committee (bcac@iccsafe.org) 2015 International Energy Conservation Code Revise as follows: SECTION R202 DEFINITIONS APPROVED. Approval by Acceptable to the code officialas a result of investigation and tests conducted by him or her, or by reason of accepted principles or tests by nationally recognized organizations. Reason: The intent of this proposal is to provide consistent language for the defined term 'Approved' within the I-codes. In several of the current I-codes, including the IBC and IFC and IMC the term is currently defined as "APPROVED. Acceptable to the code official." There is a published errata to the IPC for the defintion for 'approved' that matches what is proposed here. This proposal is submitted by the ICC Building Code Action Committee (BCAC). BCAC was established by the ICC Board of Directors to pursue opportunities to improve and enhance assigned International Codes or portions thereof. In 2014 and 2015 the BCAC has held 5 open meetings. In addition, there were numerous Working Group meetings and conference calls for the current code development cycle, which included members of the committee as well as any interested party to discuss and debate the proposed changes. Related documentation and reports are posted on the BCAC website at: BCAC (http://www.iccsafe.org/codes-tech-support/codes/code-development-process/building-code-action-committee-bcac/) Cost Impact: Will not increase the cost of construction No increase in costs as this is an editorial correlation of defined terms between the I-codes. Public Hearing Results ADM4-16 Part III : R202-KULIK13846 Part III Committee Action: Committee Reason:The committee agreed with the published reason statement. Assembly Action: Approved as Submitted None Individual Consideration Agenda Proponent : William Fay, Energy Efficiency Codes Coalition, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition; Jeffrey Harris, Alliance to Save Energy, representing Alliance to Save Energy (JeffHarris22@outlook.com); Charlie Haack, ICF International, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition; Maureen Guttman, Building Codes Assistance Project, representing Building Codes Assistance Project (mguttman@bcapcodes.org); Harry Misuriello, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition (misuriello@verizon.net); William Prindle, ICF International, representing Energy Efficient Codes Coalition requests Disapprove. Commenter's Reason: This proposal should be disapproved because it removes reasonable guidance from the IECC definition of "approved." While we can appreciate the objective of having common definitions across all the I-Codes wherever sensible, we disagree with the practice of reducing the definitions to the "least common denominator" version. The current definition of "approved" should remain in the IECC residential and commercial sections. The current definition of "approved" in the IECC makes clear that approval may involve not only a code official's judgment, but also objective tests or nationally-recognized standards. This recognizes the critical role played by standard-setting organizations to facilitate and simplify the role of the code official. Obviously, the code official or authority having jurisdiction maintains the final judgment on whether a building complies with the code or not. But we do not think it is wise to remove these options from the definition (as proposed by ADM4) simply for the sake of matching a definition in another code. If anything, we would prefer to see the more robust definition of the IECC repeated in other codes. We recommend disapproval of ADM4. Page 23 of 38