Complex physical properties

Similar documents
The packaging operation

Properties of liners

Determination of through thickness properties for Composite thick laminate S.Vali-shariatpanahi * * Stress Engineer/Durability group leader -Airbus

DIMENSIONAL STABILITY NOTES

Tensile Testing BACKGROUND INFORMATION. Harper, A., and Nickels, K Queensland University of Technology.

Investigation of Damage and Fracture Properties of a Ring Cut from Filament-Wound Pipes with and without Delamination

Totally updated version

The science behind the heart of corrugated MEDIUM

Page 1 of 46 Exam 1. Exam 1 Past Exam Problems without Solutions NAME: Given Formulae: Law of Cosines: C. Law of Sines:

Part 4 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

DMS-6300, Waterproofing

Physical Testing of Pulp and Paper, Methods & Service list

MODELING THE CREASING OF PAPERBOARD

Finite Element Simulation on Damage and Fracture Properties of a Ring Cut from Filament-Wound Pipes with and without Delamination

Introduction to Composite Materials

Introduction to Joining Processes

Breaking Strength and Elongation of Pressure Sensitive Tapes

Weight of linerboard or corrugating medium expressed in terms of pounds per 1,000 square feet (msf).

YIELD & TENSILE STRENGTH OF STEEL & ALUMINIUM USING MICROINDENTATION

Medical and Pharmaceutical Packaging Styles

CONTROL OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL CRACK BRANCHING FOR IMPROVED FRACTURE TOUGHNESS

Mechanical behavior of crystalline materials - Stress Types and Tensile Behaviour

CHEM-E0120: An Introduction to Wood Properties and Wood Products Material properties II: short-term mechanical properties

T 836 pm-95 PROVISIONAL METHOD TAPPI. Bending stiffness, four point method. 1. Scope

RACKING STRENGTH OF PAPERBOARD BASED SHEATHING MATERIALS

Welcome to ENR116 Engineering Materials. This lecture summary is part of module 2, Material Properties.

ME -215 ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND PROCESES

ADHESIVE IN THE BUCKLING FAILURE OF CORRUGATED FIBERBOARD: A FINITE ELEMENT INVESTIGATION

CHARACTERISATION OF INTERFACIAL CRACKING IN MICROELECTRONIC PACKAGING

SKIN-STRINGER SEPARATION IN GLARE COMPOSITE AEROSPACE PANELS

John F. Hunt, P.E. Forest Products Laboratory Madison, WI USA ABSTRACT

IMPACT TESTER CONTACT CYCLIC TESTING

Analysis and design of composite structures

Determining Paint Adhesion to Wood Using a Uniform Double-Cantilever Beam Technique

FAILURE PREDICTION IN HONEYCOMB SANDWICH BEAMS UNDER LOW-VELOCITY IMPACT

PHYSICAL AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF LIGNIN-FILLED LAMINATED PAPER PLASTICS

DETERMINATION OF PAPER CROSS-SECTION STRESS-STRAIN CURVES USING ZERO AND SHORT SPAN TENSILE MEASUREMENTS

INTERLAMINAR FRACTURE MECHANICS APPLIED TO BONDED WOOD PLASTIC COMPOSITES (WPCs) and HYBRID WPC- FIBER REINFORCED PLASTIC COMPOSITES

Mechanical Properties of Materials

Textiles Tensile properties of fabrics. Part 1: Determination of maximum force and elongation at maximum force using the strip method

DMS WATERPROOFING

Available from Deakin Research Online:

TECHNOLOGY FOR CONCRETE SHELLS FABRICATION REINFORCED BY GLASS FIBERS

Tests on Partially Anchored Wood-Framed Shear Walls

Subject Index. STP1156-EB/Jun. 1993

The TMI Group of Companies

Contents. Improved Level and Control of Stiffness. Introduction - research themes paper and board. Introduction - Wageningen UR Paper and Board

Topics to Discuss.. Composite Materials

Standard Test Methods for Coated Fabrics 1

How do we find ultimate properties?

THE DESIGN OF EXTERNALLY BONDED REINFORCEMENT (EBR) FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURES BY MEANS OF FIBRE REINFORCED POLYMERS (FRP)

4 Image Analysis of plastic deformation in the fracture of paper

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS

Composites. Fiber-Reinforced Composites. Fig Several geometric arrangements of fiber reinforcements. Source: Ref 10.1

A Study on Co-cured T-joint with Flange/Skin Debond

Overview. Research area Most recent projects highlights. Dr. Elaheh Ghassemieh Mechanical Engineering Department University of Sheffield

G Ic G IIc. Figure 1: The FML concept: alternating metal and composite layers.

When an axial load is applied to a bar, normal stresses are produced on a cross section perpendicular to the axis of the bar.

A Finite Element Analysis of Crack Propagation in Interface of Aluminium Foil - LDPE Laminate During Fixed Arm Peel Test

Carbon-fiber Reinforced Concrete with Short Aramid-fiber Interfacial Toughening

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITE SANDWICH STRUCTURES WITH CORE OR FACE SHEET DISCONTINUITIES

J. F. Hunt M. Tamasy-Bano and H. Nyist ABSTRACT

3. TEST METHOD FOR BOND PROPERTIES OF CONTINUOUS FIBER SHEETS TO CONCRETE (JSCE-E )

Mechanical behavior of crystalline materials- Comprehensive Behaviour

FATIGUE PROPERTIES OF HEMP FIBRE COMPOSITES

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No TEST PROCEDURE FOR NAIL-ON UNDERLAYMENT FOR USE IN DISCONTINUOUS ROOF SYSTEMS

TESTING APPLICATION STANDARD (TAS) No TEST PROCEDURE FOR NAIL-ON UNDERLAYMENT FOR USE IN DISCONTINUOUS ROOF SYSTEMS

BFF1113 Engineering Materials DR. NOOR MAZNI ISMAIL FACULTY OF MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING

COMPOSITE CARBON FIBRE EMBEDMENT DEPTH AND ANGLE CONFIGURATION INFLUENCE ON SINGLE FIBRE PULL-OUT FROM CONCRETE

Chapter 2: Mechanical Behavior of Materials

Corrugated Fiber Board as a Packaging Material: Experimental and Numerical Analysis of the Mechanical Behavior

Effect of wood stiffness on radiata pine kraft pulp quality

DEVELOPMENT OF TEST METHODS FOR ADHESION MEASUREMENTS OF FLEXIBLE ELASTIC MATERIALS

STANDARD PROCEDURE: NWSP R0 (15) Breaking Force and Elongation of Nonwoven Materials (Strip Method)

Tensile Properties of Plastics

Presentation Brochure. BirchPly Wire Mesh Transport Plywood Products and Applications.

TEST PROCEDURE FOR NAIL-ON UNDERLAYMENT FOR USE IN DISCONTINUOUS ROOF SYSTEMS

RESILIENT INFRASTRUCTURE June 1 4, 2016

SC05. General Certificate of Education June 2007 Advanced Subsidiary Examination. APPLIED SCIENCE Unit 5 Choosing and Using Materials

ME 207 Material Science I

Baggy paper webs: Effect of uneven moisture and grammage profiles in different process steps. Cecilia Land. DISSERTATION Karlstad University Studies

MECHANICS OF MATERIALS. Mechanical Properties of Materials

FATIGUE LOADING IN WIND TURBINES

Chapter 4 MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIAL. By: Ardiyansyah Syahrom

Nano Puncture Resistance Using Nanoindentation

SHORT FIBER INTERFACIAL TOUGHENING FOR COMPOSITE-FOAM SANDWICH Z. Sun 1,2, S.Y. Sun 1,2, S.S. Shi 1,2, H.R. Chen 1*, X.Z. Hu 2*

Tensile properties of paper and paperboard (using constant rate of elongation apparatus)

Debonding Behavior of Skew FRP-Bonded Concrete Joints

Technical Summary. Introduction. Fluting process. Chalmers DST

SIMPLE INVESTIGATIONS OF TENSILE MEMBRANE ACTION IN COMPOSITE SLABS IN FIRE

Properties in Shear. Figure 7c. Figure 7b. Figure 7a

ALUM HA DETERMINING TENSILE PROPERTIES Of PAPER

HONEYCOMB MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR USING MACROINDENTATION

Characteristic values of pultruded fibre composite sections for structural design

Composite Materials: Advantages and Cost Factors

THE INFLUENCE OF ASPECT RATIO OF REINFORCING FIBERS ON MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF GYPSUM MATRIX COMPOSITE PANELS

Reproducible evaluation of material properties. Static Testing Material response to constant loading

When an axial load is applied to a bar, normal stresses are produced on a cross section perpendicular to the axis of the bar.

AITC TECHNICAL NOTE 26 DESIGN VALUES FOR STRUCTURAL GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER IN EXISTING STRUCTURES December 2007

MECHANICAL PROPERTIES.

Transcription:

Complex physical properties Complex (less well-defined) physical properties are: stiffness box compression strength tearing resistance impact or burst strength delamination or interlaminar strength surface strength. Stiffness and box compression strength are described in separate sections. Key characteristics The strength properties are increased by increasing grammage. Moreover, the potential for high tensile strength is governed by the type of fibre and the production method, e.g. chemically processed, long fibres from species such as pine and spruce give the best results. Methods of fibre treatment, e.g. refining, are also important. The ratio of strength in MD/CD is dependent on the forming process at the wet end of the paperboard machine. Impact, burst strength Several more or less complicated methods exist to evaluate the physical resistance of paperboard to impact or penetration loads. The most commonly used method is the burst test, which is a modified paper test method. Burst or puncture test methods are complicated because many physical parameters are involved. Parameters such as tensile strength and elongation, bending stiffness, and tear are involved depending on the geometric conditions for the test used. This makes it very difficult to draw more specific conclusions. However, in this case a higher value does mean a strong and tough material that is tolerant of various types of stresses and strains. Tearing resistance Tearing resistance is a property based on a method which attempts to simulate the tearing of paper (tearing perpendicular to the plane of the sheet). After an initial cut, tearing is performed according to well-defined testing conditions. Despite this the physical meaning of the value (the tearing energy) is less obvious. In general, high tearing resistance depends on the general strength level (tensile strength and elongation) and the amount of long, well-bonded fibres (more and longer fibres give a better result). Measurable properties Tearing resistance is the force required to tear the paperboard from an initial cut. A tear tester of the Elmendorf type is used for this test. The test is made in both the machine direction (MD) and cross direction (CD) and is expressed in mn. The method is fairly good for paper but less useful for paperboard. Due to the way the test is performed, values for thick paper and paperboard are influenced by stiffness due to bending during tearing. Another factor is that the tearing of, for instance, multi-ply paperboard sheets sometimes changes the mode of failure from tearing into BURST TEST RUBBER MEMBRANE CLAMPING PRESSURE MEASUREMENT 18 Reference Manual IGGESUND

delamination, or a combination of the two. Due to these circumstances tearing resistance has a limited practical value considering its complexity and built-in errors. How ever, the value does indicate if the paperboard is brittle or tough. Methods have been identified that, under controlled con ditions, are able to measure in-plane propagation resis - t ance. This is a scientific value which means there are also methods to quantify tear and delamination behaviour according to material physics. Key characteristics Good tearing resistance is needed in almost every packaging or graphical application, e.g. tearing strips for opening of a package, hanging displays for a blister package, book covers, brochures, etc. Delamination, interlaminar strength Delamination strength or interlaminar strength is usually defined by a number of methods designed to measure the force or energy required to separate or delaminate the interior structure of paperboard i.e. the bonding within or between the plies, not the interface between the fibres and coating or within the coating itself. For many graphical and packaging applications a certain level of interlaminar strength should be maintained. This should be high enough to make edges, corners and flaps resist handling damage but low enough to allow for good delamination during creasing and folding. The fact that paperboard is a relatively thin but strong material with a complex porous fibre structure makes it extremely difficult to develop accurate and reliable test methods. Methods have been developed to measure delamination by using pulling (z-strength), peeling or combinations of the two. The complex loading conditions, very often using tape between the paperboard and the testing unit, create a number of restrictions and potential errors in these measur - ing methods. Due to their complexity the established methods do not explain interlaminar strength. A method based on z-directional toughness has been developed by Innventia (formerly STFI-Packforsk). This method eliminates previous difficulties and measures a well-defined physical quantity. PULLING APART (Z-STRENGTH) PEELING PULLING AND PEELING Vänta till niklas o Plastic jonas or är tillbaka metallised film Aluminium angle Metal ring Anvil IGGESUND Reference Manual 19

Key characteristics Chemically processed fibres from wood containing long fibres, like pine and spruce, together with optimised fibre treatment (refining), give the best potential for high interlayer strength. In packaging applications a frequent failure, which is due to low strength, is the failure of the tearing strip where only the top layer tears off. Measurable properties As a multi-ply paperboard is built from several layers of fibres, it is important that these layers are well bonded together. interlayer strength is the expression used to quantify this property and may be measured using a variety of techniques. The method used for all Iggesund Paperboard products is plybond using a Scott Bond type tester. In this test the energy needed to delaminate a sample by applying a perpendicular force to the paperboard surface is quantified. The test result is expressed in J/m² and the principle of the method is shown in this illustration. 13 Reference Manual IGGESUND

Mechanical behaviour The typical differences in mechanical behaviour can be explained by observing the loading and elongation behaviour (stress-strain behaviour). Recording the force and elongation during tensile testing allows us to obtain the curves shown in the illustration. Products containing 1 % chemical pulp are approximately three times stronger than those with 1 % mechanical pulp, and the elongation value is some 5 % higher. The main reason is that chemically processed pulp gives long, well-bonded fibres resulting in strong and dense products. The initial slope of the two curves corresponds to the differences in the modulus of elasticity. Paperboard consists of a fibrous network, and due to the manufacturing process more fibres are aligned parallel to the running direction of the paperboard machine. Therefore the physical properties of paperboard are directionally dependent. This means that parallel to the running direction, (the machine direction), the products are typically stronger than in the cross machine direction. Usually these directions are abbreviated MD (machine direction) and CD (cross direction). This means that paperboard is stiffer and stronger in the MD and consequently weaker in the CD. On the other hand, the elongation is less in the MD and greater in the CD. These directional-dependent differences have a large influence in many user applications, not only for physical protection but also for printing requirements such as register control, curl and flatness, creasing, and folding. The differences in the two directions should be as low as possible and are usually referred to as the MD/CD ratio for stiffness. An established way of averaging the differences in the various directions of the paperboard is to calculate the geometric mean value (SGM = SMD SCD). In this way it is possible to facilitate comparison of the levels of different materials regardless of the MD/CD ratio. The typical differences in the tensile elongation curves are shown below. Specific material properties Paperboard is a fibrous porous network consisting of cellulose fibre material and air. Consequently the loadbearing elements, the fibres, only partly fill the volume or the cross section of a paperboard strip. The apparent stress,, when a load, F, per unit width (b, width of test piece) is acting on the total cross-sectional area A, is given by: = F b/a The stress F related to the cross-sectional area AF of the fibres is: F = F b/af F It can be shown that = F = * where F and are the fibre and sheet density respectively. Thus the specific stress acting on a sheet is equal to the specific stress acting on the fibres. In this context the asterisk (*) denotes a normalisation with regard to density. Paper and paperboard may in many cases be treated as a homogeneous engineering material in spite of their fibrous, porous structure. However, since paperboard in its end use is in most cases judged by its properties per unit width, the properties: tensile failure stress ( t), compression failure stress ( c), and elastic modulus (E), which are expressed in terms of force per unit cross-sectional 3 FORCE DE TRACTION 3 PULLING FORCE Pâte chimiques Machine direction (MD) Cross direction (CD) 1 Pâtes mécaniques 1 ALLONGEMENT 1 3 ELONGATION 1 3 IGGESUND Reference Manual 131

area, are less suitable quantities for the characterisation of different products. Furthermore, these properties are sensitive to changes in sheet thickness (produced by e.g. calendering) even though the changes in thickness may not be accompanied by any real change in extensional properties. This difficulty may be overcome by expressing the sheet properties by the expressions: ( t t), ( c t), and (E t), i.e. by multiplying the tensile failure stress, compression failure stress, and elastic modulus, respectively, by the thickness (t) to give properties having the dimensions of force per unit width. Since these expressions are dependent on the basis weight of the sheet, the measurement may finally be normalised by dividing by the basis weight (w). Expressions for the specific tensile failure stress, specific compression failure stress, and specific elastic modulus are then obtained, which are equivalent to dividing the tensile failure stress, compression failure stress and elastic modulus by the density. These specific material properties are thus identical with the strength indices commonly used in the paperboard industry, as shown in the table below. Test methods There are numerous ways of measuring strength and toughness. The elastic modulus is calculated using stress and strain data from tensile testing. The strain to failure, or elongation, is recorded when the sample fails during the tensile strength measurement. Hooke s law may be modified to apply to specific properties: * = E* where * = = specific stress = strain E* = E = specific E-modulus In a material that contains air it is useful to use specific properties, which means that the strength is related to the mass of the material. Key properties Basic features that have an impact on strength and toughness: type of pulp grammage moisture content amount of pulp thickness bulk or density. F Total fibre area = A F Total cross-sectional area = A Specific properties Specific tensile failure stress Specific compression failure stress Connection t F tw = w = t * c F tw = w = t * Properties used in the paperboard industry Tensile index Compression index Specific E-modulus E E t S t = w = w = E* Tensile stiffness index 13 Reference Manual IGGESUND

Law of mixtures Defined properties such as modulus of elasticity, tensile and compression strength follow the laws of mixtures. This means that the final strength of the product is determined by the amount and strength of the ingoing components. Typical values for different types of fibres The following illustrations give some typical ranges of properties for major types of fibres used for paper board. The illustrations indicate the levels and ranges typically found and also indicate the strong effect of density on the physical properties. 8 (softwood) 1 (softwood) TENSILE STIFFNESS, MNm/kg 6 4 Bleached sulphite (spruce) (hardwood) TENSILE INDEX, knm/kg 8 6 4 (hardwood) Bleached sulphite (spruce) 4 6 8 1 4 6 8 1 COMPRESSION INDEX, knm/kg 3 5 15 1 5 (softwood) (hardwood) 4 6 8 1 TENSILE STRAIN, % 5 4 3 1 (softwood) (hardwood) Bleached sulphite (spruce) 4 6 8 1 IGGESUND Reference Manual 133