The Science Behind Quantifying Urban Forest Ecosystem Services. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

Similar documents
David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service

Quantifying Ecosystem Service and Values of the Urban Forest. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

The Value of Your Urban Forest: i-tree Tools Al Zelaya The Davey Institute

Assessing Your Local Urban Forest. David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY

Valoración ambiental y económica de la infraestructura verde en las ciudades de Estados Unidos y su replicabilidad en Ciudades Chilenas

Local Ecosystem Analysis Garland, Texas Calculating the Value of Nature

USDA Forest Service. Davey Tree Expert Co. National Arbor Day Foundation Society of Municipal Arborists International Society of Arboriculture

Greening Oakland s Infrastructure Tree by Tree

Assessment of the Benefits of Ecosystem Restoration with i-tree Eco

Air Pollutant Removals, Biogenic Emissions and. Hydrologic Estimates for i-tree Applications

So I just gave an overview of i-tree and more specifically, i-tree Eco. Now, let s get into the nuts and bolts of how to prepare for an Eco project.

Regional Ecosystem Analysis Puget Sound Metropolitan Area

Tree Canopy Mapping & Modeling of Ecosystem Services for Georgia Communities

Using i-tree to Estimate Environmental Services. Eric Kuehler Technology Transfer Specialist USDA Forest Service

Second Wednesdays 1:00 2:15 pm ET USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Benefits of Goshen s Public Trees. Stormwater Mitigation

GreenPlan Modeling Tool User Guidance

Managing trees to reduce stormwater: i Tree Hydro can help

Collaborative Urban Forest Studies in the GTA. May 12 th 2010 Meaghan Eastwood

An Analysis of Street Tree Benefits for

Air Pollution Removal by Green Infrastructure and i Tree Software. David J. Nowak US Forest Service Syracuse, NY

Environmental Benefits Analysis for Trees in Bowersville, Ohio

Software for Sustainable Landscapes

STRATUM: The Benefits and Costs of the Green Infrastructure

The Digital Forest. Geospatial Technologies in Urban Forest Management. Justin Morgenroth New Zealand School of Forestry University of Canterbury

ASSESSING THE VALUE OF URBAN FORESTS IN THE UNITED _,,_3 STATES

Chicagoland Region i-tree Eco Assessment An analysis of the structure and function of the region s urban forest. Gary Watson

Frequently Asked Questions about the UFORE model (

Energy, Climate Change, Air Quality and Urban Greening

The Texas A&M University and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation Hydrologic Modeling Inventory (HMI) Questionnaire

The University of Arizona Campus Arboretum Tree Benefits Assessment

Environmental Benefits Analysis for Trees in Clifton, Ohio

Urban Ecosystem Restoration

Second Wednesdays 1:00 2:15 pm ET USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Single most important determinant of the establishment and maintenance of specific types of wetlands & wetland processes

East Baton Rouge Parish Micro-Watershed Characterization

The Changing Urban Landscape. David J. Nowak US Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY

Second Wednesdays 1:00 2:15 pm ET USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Trees for the Governor s Residence and Heritage Gardens

Models Overview: Purposes and Limitations

GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE. An Introduction to. CITYgreen. Prepared by the Green Infrastructure Center Inc.

THE IMPORTANCE OF NATURAL WATERSHED HYDROLOGY AND HOW TO ADVANCE IT IN URBAN AREAS

NREM 407/507 WATERSHED MANAGEMENT Day 2

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Trees for Greenmount Cemetery in Springfield, Ohio

Regional Ecosystem Analysis for Metropolitan Denver and Cities of The Northern Front Range, Colorado

Modeling the Urban Stormwater (and the rest of the watershed) Katherine Antos, Coordinator Water Quality Team U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Source: City of Salem Public Works Department. Salem, Oregon Potential Urban Tree Canopy Analysis AMEC Environment & Infrastructure 1

Unit 2: Geomorphologic and Hydrologic Characteristics of Watersheds. ENVS 435: Watershed Management INSTR.: Dr. R.M. Bajracharya

COMPENSATORY VALUE OF AN URBAN FOREST: AN APPLICATION OF THE TREE-VALUE FORMULA

Monitoring Urban Forest Structure and Function after Hurricane and Assessing Ecosystem Services for Louisiana Cities

CAN URBAN TREES REDUCE THE IMPACT OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON STORM RUNOFF?

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Public Trees for Chillicothe, Ohio

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Trees for Beavercreek, Ohio T. Davis Sydnor and Sakthi Subburayalu School of Environment and Natural Resources

1 THE USGS MODULAR MODELING SYSTEM MODEL OF THE UPPER COSUMNES RIVER

Stormwater: Too Simple?

Using city tree inventory data as a tool of planning, management and economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by urban trees

Environmental Benefits Analysis of Public Trees for Springfield, Ohio

I-3 THE IMPERVIOUS COVER MODEL

BAEN 673 / February 18, 2016 Hydrologic Processes

An Analysis of Environmental Benefits. Park Trees

Total Tons Stored: Total Tons Sequestered (Annually):

SOUTHEAST TEXAS CONTINUING EDUCATION

Effect of forest management on water yields & other ecosystem services in Sierra Nevada forests UCB/UC Merced/UCANR project

HYDROLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS. 22 nd Annual Nonpoint Source Pollution Conference Saratoga Springs, NY

WWHM4 MODELING USING NATIONAL MAP

Recommendations for the Expert Panel to Define BMP Effectiveness for Urban Tree Canopy

Rangeland Watersheds. Maintenance and provision of genetic resources Maintenance and regeneration of habitat Provision of shade and shelter

Total Tons Stored: Total Tons Sequestered (Annually):

ISA Arborist Cer-fica-on Training Chapter 14 - Urban Forestry

A Method for Examining the Ecosystem Services of Roadside Trees: Springfield, Massachusetts

Why Tree Canopy Land Uses in Phase 6?

Learning Lab Learning About Tree Benefits Using i-tree Canopy

Hydromodification Computer Modeling

Co-Benefits of Green Infrastructure: An Environmental and Economic Analysis of the Save the Rain Program

i-tree User Group Meeting 2011 Partners in Community Forestry Conference

L-THIA Online and LID in a watershed investigation

A Tool To DeTerMIne CroWn AnD PloT CAnoPy TrAnSPArenCy For ForeST InvenTory AnD AnAlySIS PHASe 3 PloTS USInG DIGITAl PHoToGrAPHS

Water Data Needs and Applications in the Private Sector. Robert Annear, Vice President, Ph.D., P.E. Water is our nature

6.0 Runoff. 6.1 Introduction. 6.2 Flood Control Design Runoff

Climate- Proofing Arizona s Urban Forests, One Community at a Time

Hydrologic Modeling with the Distributed-Hydrology- Soils- Vegetation Model (DHSVM)

Assessing Urban Forest Effects and Values: Douglas County, Kansas

Maximizing the Environmental Services and Value of Plano s Urban Forest

Ecosystem Services BUCK KLINE AND VIJAY A SATYAL

Supporting Online Material for

Metropolitan Washington Regional Tree Canopy Workgroup

STRATUM: The who, what, when, where and how of street trees

An Analysis of Environmental Benefits for Canfield Fairground Trees

The Urban Forest of New York City

TOPMODEL. Download Information Availability: Nonproprietary, ( Cost: None for non-commercial uses.

SOCIAL AND HEALTH BENEFITS

Insect pests, warming, and the future of forests. Emily K. Meineke, Elsa Youngsteadt, Adam G. Dale, Robert R. Dunn, & Steven D.

Phoenix s Urban Forest

Green Infrastructure Asset Management in York, Ontario. Matthew Rodwell Karen Robichaud

Scale Effects in Large Scale Watershed Modeling

Land Modeling II - Biogeochemistry: Ecosystem Modeling and Land Use Dr. Peter Lawrence

Second Wednesdays 1:00 2:15 pm ET USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Hydrological Impact of Large Scale Conversion of Rubber to Oil Palm Plantation

Module 10b: Gutter and Inlet Designs and Multiple Design Objectives

The Urban Forest Effects (UFORE) Model: Field Data Collection Manual

Transcription:

The Science Behind Quantifying Urban Forest Ecosystem Services David J. Nowak USDA Forest Service Northern Research Station Syracuse, NY, USA

Current Model Version 3.0

i-tree Version 4.0 (March 10, 2011) 5 New or Enhanced Tools Canopy Pest

Assessing Urban Tree Populations i-tree Eco assesses: Structure Function Energy Air pollution Carbon VOC emissions Value Management needs Pest risk Tree health Exotic/invasive spp.

Data Collection

i-tree Eco Methods - Structure No. trees, species composition, tree sizes, tree condition Direct measures, statistical estimates with standard errors Leaf area Formula based on species factors and crown measurements; adjusted based on crown missing Leaf biomass Converts leaf area to leaf biomass based on species conversion factors Data can be stratified (e.g., land use)

i-tree Eco Methods - Functions Carbon Biomass equations (spp, dbh, ht) Adjusted downward for open-grown trees Annual growth based on dieback, competition and length of growing season Air Pollution Removal Leaf area index, canopy cover by evergreen or deciduous; in-leaf season length Local hourly weather & pollution conc. (C) data O 3, SO 2, NO 2 : multi-layer/big-leaf hybrid model PM, CO: average deposition velocity (Vd) Hourly Removal = Vd x C

i-tree Eco Methods - Functions Building Energy Use Based on work by McPherson and Simpson Tree size by distance and direction from building Average effects for region (heating and cooling) VOC emissions (not reported) Local hourly weather data Species leaf biomass Genera specific emission factors adjusted by NCAR and EPA formulas based on hourly light intensity and temperature (BEIS approach)

i-tree Eco Methods - Valuation Air Pollution Removal National average externality values from literature (updated to 2007) Converting to EPA BenMap estimates Carbon Storage and Sequestration Global externality estimates (Fankauser, 1994) = $22.8/metric ton Energy Use State average electricity and heating fuel costs (oil, wood, natural gas) Structural Value CTLA formula

Project Equipment and Costs Crew salary Transportation Project oversight (QA/QC, training) Equipment Aerial photographs and street map to locate plots Clinometer Diameter tape Clipboard; data sheets, pens/pencils (or digital recorders- PDA) 50/100 ft tape measure (or electronic measuring device) Species ID guide Compass Camera (if taking pictures of plot) Chalk/Flagging (to mark trees that have been measured in plots with many trees)

Research Process Structural Analysis Data collection 900 trees, 20 predominant species age, species, dbh, ht., crown dia., condition, digital photos, foliar biomass samples, etc. Calculate leaf area and foliar biomass Regression models predict growth. Regional Climate Vegetation Structure ---- Tree locations Species Canopy cover Leaf area Biomass Growth Mortality Diversity Health Site Bldg. data M Vegetation Structure ---- Tree locations Species Canopy cover Leaf area Biomass Growth Mortality Diversity Health Site Sequestration CO2 Released Bldg. data Emission Factors Meteor. Data Shade Air temp. Wind speed RH Energy Heating Cooling Air Quality Data NOx, SOx, O3, PM10 Dry deposition B.V.O.C. Isoprenes Monoterpenes Stormwater Runoff Interception Firewise Landscape s Aesthetics Other Sequestration CO2 Released Reduction in atmospheric CO2 Emission Factors Reduction in atmospheric CO2 Structure Avoided Emissions Energy & CO2 Air quality improvement Air Quality Hydrology Fire Other Structure

Research Process Functional Analysis Models use structural data (size at various ages). Vegetation To determine magnitude Structure of annual benefits: Energy saved Atmospheric CO 2 reduction Air pollutants removed Rainfall intercepted Aesthetics & other ---- Tree locations Species Canopy cover Leaf area Biomass Growth Mortality Diversity Health Site Sequestration CO2 Released Reduction in atmospheric CO2 Bldg. data Emission Factors Regional Climate Meteor. Data Shade Air temp. Wind speed RH Energy Heating Cooling Avoided Emissions Air Quality Data NOx, SOx, O3, PM10 Dry deposition Air quality improvement B.V.O.C. Isoprenes Monoterpenes Stormwater Runoff Interception L Structure Energy & CO2 Air Quality Hydrology

Research Process Value Analysis (Net Benefits) Convert resource units (kwh, lbs) to $ Annual Benefits: B = Energy + CO 2 + AQ + Hydrology + property value Annual Costs: C = Plant + Trim + Removal + IPM + Irrigation + Clean-Up + Sidewalk + Liability + Admin + Other Net Benefits = B C Benefits/Costs ratio = B/C

What Does Species Do? Ranks tree species based on their environmental benefits at maturity Complements existing tree selection programs

v. 4.0 Improvement

How Does Species Work? Utilizes local data Simple user interface Produces reports based on function

Using i-tree Species Input location, height, pollutant removal, and other functions Includes user input of importance values

UFORE - Hydro Management model designed to be relatively easy to use Object-oriented, physical based, semidistributed, topographic model TOPMODEL theory is used to simulate saturation excess overland flow (for forest area), base flow and ET process Warm weather, semi-distributed urban soilvegetation-atmosphere transfer scheme (SVATS) C++ code with GIS inputs

UFORE Hydro Strengths Specifically designed to incorporate urban tree and impervious surface effects on stream flow and water quality Built to simulate the dynamic forest interception, infiltration and ET processes as well as urban impervious effect on runoff generation. Calibrated against measure stream flow data Relatively easy to use

UFORE Hydro Weaknesses Lacks capabilities of fully-distributed model Currently does not allow for specific locational designs of tree cover, impervious cover, or retention/detention ponds (operates on general cover types) Works on watershed basis (with gauging station)

Model Inputs Hourly discharge data (USGS) Digital elevation map (USGS) Hourly weather and evaporation data Evaporation data calculated from weather data Structural information on watershed (NCLD and UFORE data) e.g., Tree cover Impervious cover Shrub and grass cover LAI

Model Calibration Auto calibrator (DOS Parameter Estimation (PEST) program) Iterative process Calibration results Peak flow weighted (CRF1) Base flow weighted (CRF2) Balanced flow (peak and base) (CRF3)

Model Calculations Topographic index with tree and impervious cover Interception routine Canopy parameters (throughfall, storage capacity, daily leaf and trunk area) Depression storage (impervious) Evaporation and transpiration from vegetation, soil and water surfaces Infiltration into soils Subsurface, overland and impervious runoff

Model Outputs For each time step (1 hour for these simulations): Canopy interception Depression storage Infiltration Evapotranspiration Surface and subsurface (base flow) runoff Channel discharge (total runoff)

Water Quality Separate program with inputs from UFORE Hydro files Multiple options that incorporate universal soil loss equation; buildup wash off routines Currently only using EMC Many other options need more input data Dissolved sediment / solid pollutant load Septic load Dissolved pollutant concentration

Baisman Run Watershed Area (m2) 3,844,800 Percent Impervious cover 0.2 Percent Tree Cover 68.7 Percent of Tree Cover over Impervious Area 5 Percent Water Cover 0 Average Tree Leaf Area Index (LAI) 3.5 Percent Shrub Cover 7.8 Percent Grass Cover 20 Percent Evergreen Trees 4.2 Percent Evergreen Shrubs 21 Shrub LAI 3.9 Leaf on Day 80 Leaf off Day 294

Baisman Run CRF1 = 0.56 CRF2 = 0.63 CRF3 = 0.70 Red Observed; Black - Modeled

Baisman Run 1,000,000 900,000 800,000 700,000 Runoff (m3/yr) 600,000 500,000 400,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 0 95 80 Impervious Cover (%) 60 40 20 0 100 80 60 0 20 40 Tree Cover (%)

Percent Change in Annual Stream Flow. Percent Change in Annual Stream Flow. Baisman Run Canopy held at 70% Impervious held at 10% 60.0 14.0 50.0 12.0 40.0 10.0 8.0 30.0 6.0 20.0 4.0 10.0 2.0 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Impervious Cover 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Tree Cover

Canopy

i-tree Canopy (v. 4.0)

You choose the cover classes

Classify random points

Statistics

Pest

Pest Pest Detection Protocol Collect Pest & Disease Signs Symptoms Reports Associated pest & diseases Trends/patterns

I-PED Pest Evaluation & Detection (beta) IPED Goal- detect pest and diseases in urban environments as soon as possible

Reporting by species, zone or street

IPED Online Diagnostic Key http://wiki.bugwood.org/iped

What Does Vue Do? Utilizes existing land cover data maps for analysis Provides modeling for future planting scenarios Analyzes canopy cover Illustrates ecosystem services

How Does Vue Work? Utilizes existing public data sets Produces simple maps Can be used at various scales

Vue Home Page

Vue Home Page

Main Navigation Window

Main Navigation Window

Analysis Tabs

Map Output Carbon Storage

Save Options

Analysis Report Carbon Storage

Map Output Canopy Stocking

Map Output Canopy Stocking

Analysis Report Canopy Stocking

Street Tree Storm Damage Estimates

The SDAP Process PLOT GENERATOR Random Plots Pre-Storm Sample Survey Estimating Engine Post-Storm Survey Final Damage

Questions? dnowak@fs.fed.us nrs.fs.fed.us/units/urban

How is an assessment done? i-tree Step 1 Determine Study Area

i-tree Step 2 Determine if inventory or sample

i-tree Step 2a Determine Number of Plots Typically 200 1/10 acre plots

i-tree Step 3 Determine what data to collect Required core variables (spp, dbh) Optional variables Crown parameters Tree health Distance to buildings Shrub data Ground cover data

i-tree Step 4 Lay sample points Random Pattern Random Grid Pattern Stratified by LU

Random with no Stratification

Random with Stratification

i-tree Step 5 Set up project

i-tree Step 6 Train crews and collect field data

i-tree Step 7 Enter data and analyze

i-tree analyses

i-tree Step 8 Use data and reports to make a difference Automatic Report Generator