Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sources Amy Banister, Sr. Dir. Air Programs

Similar documents
NAWTEC DRAFT SOLID WASTE CARBON PLANNING TOOL. Proceedings of of NAWTEC16. Emily Bedwell, HDR

Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Update Myriam McChargue, Camp Dresser & McKee

Quantification Protocol for Landfill Gas Capture and Combustion Carbon Competitiveness Incentive Regulation

The Role of Waste-to-Energy in a Renewable and Carbon-Conscious Environment

Implementation of EPA s Mandatory GHG Reporting Requirements

Waste Management Comments on Draft Organic Waste Composting Project Protocol Version 1.0 (May 2010) June 7, 2010

Draft Quantification Protocol for Landfill Gas Capture and Combustion Carbon Competitiveness Incentive Regulation

Discussion Paper for a Wastewater Treatment Plant Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reporting Protocol

A Checklist for Alberta s Climate Change Plan: What to Look for in a Comprehensive Action Plan for Alberta to Fight Global Warming

A Look at Fugitive GHG Emissions Reporting and the Effects on Regulated Facilities

Understanding Greenhouse Gases

Climate Change, Biomass and Waste Management Chuck White Director of Regulatory Affairs -- WM West California Biomass Collaborative Sacramento, CA --

In Focus: Carbon Offsets under AB 32. From the desk of Carbon Credit Capital team member Yuliya Lisouskaya

ISWA White Paper on Waste and Climate Change

Solid Waste Industry for Climate Solutions

What s the connection between carbon offsets and organics diversion?

Waste Management in a Low Carbon Economy. Jennifer Baron

The Importance of Landfill Gas Capture and Utilization in the US

Corporate Emissions Assessment Protocol

California s Revised Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Regulation

Roadmap to Carbon Neutrality. October 30, 2008

Generation, control and utilization of methane at Canadian landfills

Scope and methodology for measuring the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) and Carbon Profile of the Canadian Forestry Industry

Is Your Landfill Generating Carbon Credits, or Just Hot Air? A Verifier s s Perspective

EPA Analysis of the Waxman-Markey Discussion Draft: The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 Executive Summary April 20, 2009

Greenhouse Gas Permitting Issues and Approaches for Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Greenhouse Gases and Mandatory Reporting December 11, 2008 Judy B. Yorke, P.E., C.P.P.

Arizona s Climate Change Action Plan

Research Manitoba Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Reduction Targets, Reporting, Actions

Guidance Document HOME ENERGY CALCULATOR

Regional Prediction of LFGTE Potential: Florida Case-Study

Debra Reinhart Hamid Amini. University of Central Florida

Terrie Boguski Harmony Environmental, LLC Kansas State University. January 2010

Climate Change Issues and Initiatives Matt Kuryla January 8, 2008 HOU03:

Ontario Public Service Guidance Document for Quantifying Projected and Actual Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions

Measuring & Quantifying CH 4 from MSW Landfills

Carbon Risks and Opportunities in the Mining Industry Edward C. (Ted) Bell, P. Eng. Partner, Tax Services May 16, 2012

Overview of AB 32, Cap and Trade Program

Carbon Reporting & Footprinting. Jean Lowes

Greenhouse Gas Emission Factors Info Sheet

Got Manure? Carbon Management Workshop

Carbon Management 101

Duke Energy s Low Carbon Strategy Initiatives for West Virginia December 8, 2009

Global Overview of Policies Affecting Coal Mine Methane (CMM) Recovery and Utilization

Carbon Heat Energy Assessment and. (CHEApet) Tutorials: Carbon Footprint Primer

Xcel Energy Inc. - Climate Change 2018

Gia Schneider, Partner, EKO Asset Management. Carbon Sequestration on Farms & Forests Clayton Hall Newark, DE

Climate Change and Carbon Trading

NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT, INC. West Coast Regional Center Mailing address: PO Box 458, Corvallis OR 97339

Recent Developments in GHG and Climate Change Management. April 15, 2010

Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences Engineering School for Sustainable Infrastructure and Environment. University of Florida 2/10/2017 1

Canadian Hydropower and the Clean Power Plan

THE BUSINESS CASE FOR CARBON MANAGEMENT: NEW OPPORTUNTIES FOR OFFSET REVENUES FROM MANURE DIGESTERS

California Cap and Trade Program

CEQA Climate Change Analysis for Proposed Biomass Power Generation Facility

Forestry, Carbon Markets and Ecosystem Services. Jim Bowyer Dovetail Partners, Inc.

WA3: Green Waste Diversion

Lesson 1: Introduction to GHG Projects and Project Level Accounting. Page 1 Learning Objectives

THE VOLUNTARY CARBON OFFSET MARKET IN AUSTRALIA

Carbon Trading an overview of financial instruments designed to combat climate change

Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Air Regulation Updates Scott Martin, P.E. Burns & McDonnell July 1, 2014

Waste management options and climate change - the case of biowaste

Reducing Greenhouse Gases through Agriculture & Forestry. January 2008

Environmental Policy: Kyoto, Carbon Trading, and California

Chapter 4.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions

EPA/SEI Offsets Protocols Road Test Overview

American Carbon Registry

Composting Project Protocol. Public Kick-Off Meeting December, 9, 2009 Portland, OR

British Columbia s Carbon Tax Strengths and Opportunities

The Role of Carbon Pricing Policies in Contributing to Stabilization of Agricultural CO 2 Emissions in North America: Emphasis on Agriculture

Current MSW Industry Position and State of the Practice on Methane Destruction Efficiency in Flares, Turbines, and Engines

2007 UW-Stevens Point Greenhouse Gas Inventory

TELUS Greenhouse Gas. Report

1 Risks and Opportunities Objective: To identify strategic risks and opportunities and their implications.

9.1 Applicability. 9-1 Cogeneration. December 2008

Landfill Bioreactor Protocol May 2008 SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION. MAY 2008 Version 1. Page 1

Landfill Bioreactor Protocol May 2008 SPECIFIED GAS EMITTERS REGULATION. Withdrawn. MAY 2008 Version 1. Page 1

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTIONS FROM U.S. LANDFILL GAS UTILIZATION PROJECTS: LANDFILLS TO THE RESCUE ABSTRACT

EMISSIONS REGULATIONS AND REDUCTIONS TECHNOLOGY IN WESTERN CANADA S OIL & GAS SECTOR

Ministry of Environment Climate Action Secretariat Emission Offset Project Report Template Version 2.1 December 2017

CCAC Action: Workshop on GHG and SLCPs Emission Quantification Methods ISWA Congress 2013 Vienna 08 October 2013

DRAFT Local Government Operations Protocol June 19, 2008

LFG Collection Efficiency: Debunking the Rhetoric

Climate Action Plans. Alan Zelenka Energy Services Leader Eugene, Oregon

Review of Cap and Trade Regulation

Operating. Criteria REVISION. April M5V 3E4. Produced by: M5V 3E4

Carbon emissions (2000)

Julie Godin, Carbon Finance Specialist Carbon Finance Unit April, 2009

Best Practices Learned from Greenhouse Gas Reporting

Cap-and-Trade: The Basics

CLIMATE ACTON PLANNING & MITIGATION: Base Year 2016 Greenhouse Gas Inventory Results

The Effects of Organic Waste Diversion on Landfill Gas Generation from U.S. Landfills

Agriculture and Carbon Offsets Policy

Biosolids and Greenhouse Gas Accounting. Sally Brown, Andrew Carpenter, Ned Beecher, AndrewTrlica and Kate Kurtz

ORGANISATIONAL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS (CARBON FOOTPRINT) DISCLOSURE

Final Proposal for Technical Working Group on Scope 2 Accounting and Reporting October I. Summary of Scope 2 Accounting and Reporting Steps

CDP6 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Questionnaire - Avery Dennison Corporation

Carbon Finance for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-Use Sectors

LANDFILL GAS ENERGY: AN IMPORTANT COMPONENT OF INTEGRATED SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT. Thomas A. Frankiewicz U.S. EPA LMOP Washington, DC

The role of carbon markets in supporting adoption of biochar

Transcription:

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sources Amy Banister, Sr. Dir. Air Programs

Introduction Waste Industry Emission Sources Inventorying GHG Emissions Status of Climate Change Programs Issues and Challenges

What is the Big Picture? Landfill CH 4 emissions are estimated to be the largest source of anthropogenic CH 4 emissions in the United States. However, the waste industry is estimated to be a relatively small contributor to GHG emissions: Globally <5% 1 US ~3% 2 Canada ~4% 3 1 IPCC, AR4, WGIII, 2007 2 NSWMA, 2006 3 Environment Canada, 2006

GHG Pollutants and Global Warming Potential (GWP)

Solid Waste Management GHG Sources and Sinks Source? Source Sink Source Sink Sink

Calculating GHG Emissions Fuel Consumption (on and off road) Fuel supplier records Site-level fuel purchase records/controller tax reports Emission factors based on type of fuel Energy Consumption Electricity, heat and steam (Kwh usage or MMBtu usage) Utility Bills Emission factors based on usage rates and generation type Recycling (avoided emissions)

Calculating GHG Emissions Combustion (and Electric Power Transmission?) WTE Site records of waste tonnage, default emission factor Site records of electricity sold LFGTE and Flaring Site records of LFG flow and methane concentration Site records of electricity sold

Calculating GHG Emissions Landfill Fugitive Emissions Site records of LFG flow and methane concentration LFG generation is modeled (e.g., LANDGem) Default factors for methane oxidation and fugitives Published/on-going research on measuring net emissions (oxidation, sequestration, fugitive)

Emerging Regulatory Programs Voluntary or Mandatory GHG Inventorying Capping GHG Emissions for Selected Sectors Carbon Taxes GHG Offset or Allowance Trading Biofuels or Engine Mandates Incentives for New Technology & Renewable Energy

US Legislation Eleven Bills proposed America s Climate Security Act of 2007 (Lieberman and Warner) sent to full Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on November 1, 2007 Proposes to cut US GHG emissions 15% below 2005 levels by 2020 References The Climate Registry

Environment Canada Climate Plan Plan aims to curb intensity through baseline-and-credit system Offset credit system / trading not defined Possibly purchase international credits via Kyoto s CDM program Up to 10% of compliance deficit Anticipate proposed regulations for review in 2008

Regional Programs Western Climate Initiative - British Columbia, Manitoba and AZ, CA, NM, OR, UT and WA set GHG reduction goal. Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan observing. (www.westernclimateinitiative.org) The Climate Registry More than 40 states, tribes, and Canadian provinces creating uniform standards and GHG emissions reporting system. (www.theclimateregistry.org)

Western Climate Initiative Regional Goal: Aggregate reduction of 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. Multi-sector market-based mechanisms All sectors targeted - includes transportation, waste management and energy supply By August 2008, design recommendations for regional cap-andtrade program Stakeholder input via 5 subcommittees: reporting, scope, electricity, allocations, and offsets. Teleconference 12/6/2007 Public workshops starting 2008

The Climate Registry THE CLIMATE REGISTRY is a collaboration between states, provinces and tribes aimed at developing and managing a common greenhouse gas emissions reporting system to support reporting and reduction policies for members and reporting entities British Columbia, Manitoba, and Quebec provinces are members

The Climate Registry General Reporting Protocol (GRP) GRP for voluntary emissions reporting All 6 GHGs annually Entity-wide emissions from North American operations at facility level Direct, indirect emissions AND Biogenic emissions Above de minimis (>3%) Third Party verification required Public disclosure of facility-level data

The Climate Registry General Reporting Protocol (GRP) Third Party verification required Public disclosure of facility-level data Public comments due November 30 on GRP and companion Verification Protocol Anticipate Final GRP Board review January 2008

Alberta Regulation 251/2004: Climate Change and Emissions Management Act Effective July 1, 2007, Alberta facilities that directly emit more than 100,000 tonnes of CO2e/year must: Submit certified annual inventory reports; and Reduce emissions intensity by 12%. Operating improvements Buy Alberta-based credits; or Contribute to the Climate Change and Emissions Management Fund. Biomass CO2 emissions excluded

California Global Warming Act of 2006 (AB32) Reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 Requires statewide cap on GHG emissions starting 2012 CARB to establish mandatory reporting system By 1/1/2008, CARB must define 1990 GHG emissions baseline

CARB Landfill Inventory Protocol CARB inventory protocol for landfills: Uses LFG recovery data and default collection efficiency to determine uncollected gas (75%) Default methane oxidation factor (10%) applied to uncollected gas All LFG combustion devices are assumed to have the same destruction efficiency regardless of type (99%) Considers CO 2 biogenic Includes carbon sequestration as in informational item only; does not consider actual emission reduction

Overview of SWICS Inventory Methodology for Landfills Solid Waste Industry for Climate Solutions (SWICS) Follows CARB methane emission calculation equation but different defaults based on site data and research values Collection Efficiency Based on cover type and (Subtitle D) liner Allows for adjustment based on site monitoring data and system performance 50% default assumed where no GCCS installed

Collection Efficiency Criteria Cover Type Subtitle D Liner? Collection Efficiency Daily Yes 95%-99% Daily No 50%-85% Intermediate Yes 95%-99% Intermediate No 85%-99% Final Yes 95%-99% Final No 85%-99%

Overview of SWICS Inventory Methodology for Landfills Methane Oxidation Factors Based on cover type per area Daily, intermediate, final, and biocovers Account for increased oxidation from improved covers like biocovers Expressed as percentage and g/m2/day (

SWICS Oxidation Rates Cover Type Oxidation Factor Daily 22.70% Intermediate 32.08% Final 35.63% Biocover 55.33% Cover Type Daily Intermediate Final Biocover Oxidation Rate 45 g/m 2 /day 86 g/m 2 /day 104 g/m 2 /day 181 g/m 2 /day

SWICS Methane Destruction Efficiency Uses values based on source tests from 2003 to 2007 of flares, engines, and turbines Based on type of control device (flare, engine, or turbine) Device Type Destruction Efficiency Flare 99.96% Engine 98.34% Turbine 99.97%

SWICS Carbon Sequestration Methodology Reflects carbon mass balance for the landfill Can use site specific waste characterization data if available or statewide data Uses carbon storage factors specific to each refuse component Includes factors for more than just wood waste Suggests inclusion as emission reduction or avoided emissions

Carbon Storage Potential 100 lb Log in Forest Degrades (15% Moisture Content) - Biogenic Degradation by definition is not a GHG - Degrades in Aerobic Environment 100 lbs MSW in Landfill (20% Moisture Content) Degrades in Anaerobic Environment Reference: USEPA, 2006 Inventory of U.S. GHG Emission and Sinks 158.95 lbs CO2 (Biogenic) Log completely degrades including lignin (bacteria uses O2 from atmosphere) 6.77 lbs Methane (Anthropogenic) GCCS Collection Efficiency = 75% (Note 2) (Assumption AP-42) 18.61 lbs CO2 (Biogenic) 10.15 lbs C12 (Sequestered) (Note 1) Molecular Weights CH4 =16 CO2=44 C12=12 Lignin Does not Degrade in LF (C12 converted to CCO2-E) 5.08 lbs Methane Collected 1.69 lbs Methane Potentially Fugitive 0.17 lb Methane Oxidized (Note 3) Coal/Natural Gas Fuel Offset (Very Small) 5.08 lbs Methane collected and destroyed or used beneficially (Note 5) 1.52 lbs methane Emitted Fugitively (Note 4) 1.52 lbs methane x 21 = 31.97 lbs CO2-E Emitted Fugitively 37.22 lbs Sequestered CO2 Offset (Note 1) Note 1 -MSW degrades generally without oxygen and thus lignin is sequestered and doesn't convert to CO2. Note 2 - Collection Efficiency per AP-42 is assumed to be 75%. Poorer collection efficiency leads to greater fugitive emissions. Note 3- Methane oxidation through the daily/intermediate soil is estimated/assumed to be 10% (Climate Leaders protocol assumes 10% default factor); AP-42 doesn't take this methane oxidation into consideration. Note 4- Tunable Diode Laser testing and flux box testing is measuring mass emissions for several WM landfills so this is an estimate. Note 5- A beneficial use project off-sets coal and natural gas fuels to for an additional offset to CO2 in this flow diagram. If we flare there is no off-set credit. 5.25 lbs CO2-E Sequestered = (Dead Carbon)

Comparison of Values Parameter CARB Default Value SWICS Value Methane capture efficiency 75% 50%-99% Methane oxidation in cover 10% 22.70%-53.33% Methane destruction efficiency Carbon storage value 99% 98.34%-99.97% Combination of EPA, IPCC, and CEC factors. 50% of degradable organic carbon for most waste Several waste dependant storage factors

Issues and Challenges Will inventory rules be fair and efficient? Policy/perception is outpacing technical data Protocols not defined or representative for certain waste activities; no global agreement on inventory protocols Will landfills get credit for carbon sequestration & methane oxidation? Time critical to develop/validate methods for estimating landfill fugitive emissions TDL, methane flux, and carbon storage research

Issues and Challenges Time line is accelerating; CA AB 32 and Alberta Rules in place, regional registries formed Consistent technical strategy and messaging not in place Trade Associations not strategically positioned Does What happens in CA stay in CA?

In Closing... It s going to be another busy and interesting GHGs will Drive Recycling and Waste Reduction Initiatives Biogenic emissions reported? Protocol for Assessing GHG Recycling Credits? New protocol/models for fugitive landfill emissions Credit for LF sequestration? Additional regulatory requirements likely: early collection and maximum capture & use of landfill gas